Wage Slavery & Anticapitalist Slavers
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.ย. 2024
- Wage Slavery can be a quite controversial concept, but what is it supposed to mean and what does it denounce? Let's figure it out through socialists, slavery advocate George Fitzhugh and Abraham Lincoln.
Check out the stream! Twitch.tv/germinaal
Check out the segments of the stream! @Germinaal
Check out an Anarchist FAQ! @AnAnarchistFAQ
Support us on Patreon: / thecanvas
#arthistory #art
*I USED TO WORK WITH ABUSE VICTIMS* I was often stuck by the fact that a middle-class victim was often trapped in a psychological prison by the abuser, whereas the working-class victim was trapped in a far more *real* financial prison.
I could coach the middle-class victim to see their circumstances differently and to leave [and they did] but you can't coach a poor person to get in a car they don't have and leave.
I know it's a moot point to take this "critique" seriously since it's only ever said as a trhought terminating cliche by bad faith actors, but this is why the "If you hate capitalism so much, just fucking leave." line pisses me off so much. Yeah sure I would genuinely love nothing more than to go to some place where I'll be treated far better and have a much higher chance of upward momentum than America, but are the asshats spouting that line going to turn up to pay for the fucking plane ticket I need to go to New Zealand of Canada or some other place in Europe?
Thank you, this is very often overlooked. People seeking therapy need to know their therapist is going to take into account all of their client’s life circumstances.
Basically, the problems of the working class are material, not Freudian, Jungian or Lacanian. Too bad we have been tricked to think it's individual responsibility that defines our lot in life, not the capitalist system of exploitation.
@@brandonmorel2658 This is why the govt in the UK has such a problem at the moment. You can tell people the working class are poor cos they are lazy and feckless, and the middle class will believe it cos its a compliment to them. They are BETTER than that. But now the middle classes are starting to feel the pinch and shatters the glass floor below them "IM NOT lazy and feckless and IM starting to struggle - so its REAL, this crisis is REAL. My god imagine how bad it must be for poor people if IM struggling"
as son as it reaches the middle class the lie is shattered.
People should be suspicious of narratives around domestic abuse. Recent studies shows that just because people advocate for victims does not mean they know even the basics about is a phenomenon, and some are very biased. For example, studies the same abuse reports where race/sex etc was revealed shown to the general public vs. as shown to advocates, the public called abuse as abuse regardless. Also, since the leading type of abuse is bilateral, IE 2 violent people found each other, it should be a red flag that we keep seeing abuse victim as one role and abuser as the other as the most common way of framing IPV.
Cooking your own meals definitely makes a difference, frozen veggies and fruits are great way to cut costs. Also, rice, beans, potatoes will fill you up and are still affordable, add in a little protein, rolls, you got yourself a nice meal. Oatmeal and pancakes, those are cheap meals and fill you up. Dollar tree saves you a lot of $$$
Going to garden this spring, can't wait to grow my own food and get a solar generator, even catch some rainwater
After living in a car for over a year, very grateful for this tiny home camper near the moutains, peaceful. My health has improved greatly already
I felt freedom like no other when living from my van but I decided to go see my elderly mother instead of pay my bills and it got repo'd. Legally homeless but living with my GF and her sister now illegally I'm their apartment. Hoping to get another car even a small one to live in soon.
yeah, no. I like to enjoy my meals, and nothing tastes better then fresh meat.
@@MongoGamer how are you illegally livng in their apartment? dear gods, do they know you are there? are you living in the attic secretly?
@@DellikkilleD lol only the landlord doesn't know
@@DellikkilleD Nothing tastes better than fresh marlboros but I quit smoking.
Slavery in America was never abolished, it was renamed. The new name for slaves in the current times is, THE WORKERS.
Nailed it...and with this there is no arguing...just a straight fact 👍
Nobody is skinning workers to turn them into shoes or using a bullwhip to paralyze them for several days in ways that leave lifelong scars. Yes, workers are abused, but it's really nothing like chattel slavery.
The haves, and the have nots. When they eventually own everything, that includes us. Unless, we leave.
I though they were called prisoners
@@j03Bizit’s “the have nots” and “the have Yachts” now actually.
Slaves had their food and shelter taken care of. A wage slave is now in a very precarious position the average salary barely covers food and shelter.
Correction it doesn’t barely cover, it doesn’t cover. Period.
America has the largest welfare system on the face of the earth.
@@dieselphiendno
@@G.Bfit.93 It's over $1.2 trillion dollars per year. Guess where it comes from?
@@dieselphiend other people have govt healthcare and much more substantial govt stipend in terms of unemployment and food assistance
Whether you are a slave to a capitalist or the the State, we cannot escape the nature of work in a post-domesticated world, and the fact that no one is truly free.
No one was ever free. Humans as social animals are always bound to other humans.
You are right of course, the idea of freedom, liberty and democracy was just an ideology sold to us (especially here in America).
Whether you are owned by a communist/socialist state or by a capitalist system, you would have to live under an illusion…
@@joncarroll2040 ...Are you suggesting that a group of humans that want to be free collectively, cannot do so simply because they're a group??
Yep...and you can blame "the protestant work ethic" for that 100%
@@RikLeedsMusic.77 Yes, of course. To be free within the boundaries of one group partitioned from everyone else, there must a certain set of rules by which one can differentiate the inner group from the outer group, thereby creating chains of a different nature
To adress a minor point covered, "we live in a far better condition than before; we dont work as long and cant be fired at a moments notice". Unfortunately I live in a "right-to-work" state and was told directly to my face by the HR Head "you know we can fire you at any time right". She did this to my face, on two seperate occasions, then fired me for having a "disrespectful outburst" in a meeting. I was then forced to explain my actions, I explained my recent Autistic diagnosis and the fact that I felt threatened in the meeting. Even if you know nothing of autism, know that in a tramatic meltdowm moment for an ASD person to talk through it and explain themselves that takes a lot! I was then badgered further for my outburst and told, "youre very high functioning for an autistic person. I have a family member whose autistic, so youre high functioning". I was terminated immediatedly, no write ups or procedures followed. Just terminated like a passing thought. Theres no legality to be had, we are currently in some very dangerous slave labor times...its just veiled SLIGHTLY better with even more people brainwashed...
And she didnt even use the "right-to-work" fear tactic correctly in my opinion given the phrase definition...
P.s. I come to find out weeks later when applying for unemployment the employer was trying to contest me receiving money too which effectively locked me out of any claims to assistance. They want you to be subserviant, then if youre no longer needed they toss you aside expecting you to get nothing further. This is the reality.
Yeah that's why you don't allow anyone to get too much leverage on you. You attempt to have a multitude of clients so if one client is an asshole you can block them and still have a bunch of other clients that'll pay you. That's the game. Even if you own a business this is the best route. If you own your own business and 75% of your business comes from one client than guess what? That client basically owns you. He didn't bring that up in the video but I believe that slavery really is just the relationship between provider and client.
You can escape as long as you don't give them too much power.
Under capitalism, you're a disposable object. It's the way of thinking of psychopaths.
I live in ontario and its amazing to see the war over worker rights between our government and our auto manufacturing corporations.
My personal trainer once told me a story about how his uncle was cheating a client of theirs for almost a month. His uncle has a flooring business and he got a contract from one of the major auto manufacturers in onatrio to fix the floor in one of their factories. He told all of his employees that they had to work on the weekends even though the factory manager told him that they could work during the week. One day my trainer who was working for his uncle at the time was asked by the factory manager why they could only work on weekends and he told the manager that his uncle said that the manager would only allow them to work on weekends. So my trainer goes to HIS employer, his uncle, and asks him why hes making them work on weekends. His uncle basically said that its his right as a business man to do whatever he wants in order to make money. My trainer quit not long after that revelation and started his own personal training business.
Not sure this sounds like "better than before" there bud...js
@@RikLeedsMusic.77 the only better I'm seeing honestly is whoever the person in question is, they don't own ME. Now all the avenues of survival that surround me, maybe for now, but at the very least they don't own ME as a person.
Unfortunately as someone who is only fourth generation removed from slavery I'm here to tell you this is the only allowance that has been made. My grandmother told me how her grandmother died in slavery, chained. Her mother struggled with sharecropping so that she (my grandmother) could afford better. My grandmother was a housekeeper/ cleaner in the 30s-60s so that my mother could have better. I know what wage slavery looks like because it's been in my family for generations...
"Slavery was never abolished, it was only extended to include all the colors." - Charles Bukowski (1920-1994)
I have often thought that one of the cruelties around slavery in the U.S. was that freed people, with no education, few possessions, no money, often illiterate with only basic skills were turned out on the road, families and all to fend for themselves. Turned out to a hostile society, to suffer starve and wander until they found a way to keep things together.
Thats one reason the US government gave them initiative programs to help ‘settle’ (kill off and claim) lands they didn’t want Native Americans to keep with the promise of their own land
Disgusting and clever, using the people they already used against the people they were still busy killing openly
Hey thanks for writing that, it really made me think and got my brain working
And if you look at that time, they learned to be self reliant.
...that is a romanticized popularized dream, but not completely untrue. There is plenty of material from humans that were slaves describing their experiences as freemen.
They weren't.
Every day I am re-radicalized 😤
As you should.
Perhaps one day you will bother to learn economics and not be so susceptible to "radical" charlatans that are more about neutralizing you into a functionary in an equation than changing anything that you or I want for the better.
Good luck.
Everyday people like me take your share because we work.
Keep up Monkey.
@@youtubesucks1499 Lol that's the spirit! Be prideful of your exploitation. Drink the koolaid!
In the 1980's Thatcherism in the UK push the idea that only losers didn't own their home, that rent was wasted money. They deregulated the financial markets & allowed banks to provide mortgages with less savings ( a deposit) than the traditional Building Societies that imposed conditions i.e. had to be a regular saver for at least 2 years & had to have a minimum deposit of 10-20%, the multiple of the man's wages was limited to x3 & a wife would only get 0.5% if working. Banks on the other hand would offer higher multiples treating husband & wife the same & never ask the question the building society would of "do you intend to give up your job to start a family?"
Many people didn't realise that they would over a 25 year mortgage pay back 3 times the value of the house to the lender or thought this was good to get on the property ladder. A house became and asset to be traded to get a bigger house & a larger mortgage rather than a home. So people became indebted & had to rely on good fortune to increase wages & good health plus security of employment to prevent foreclosure, the loss of the house & all the money they had paid monthly over time when the property was repossessed by the lender who would then sell it to another mortgage holder.
The European Union brought in "The Working Time Directive" that limited employees hours of work to 48 hours per week averaged over a 2 week period. The right-wing government allowed an opt-out in the UK for managers. This led to many companies redefining workers as managers & those who refuse to sign the paperwork & accept the new job title being demoted or fired under the guise of restructuring the department.
In the 21st Century we have seen the rise of the gig economy & "independent contractors" whereby workers have been stripped of their hard won rights & forced to accept low pay & longer hours just to keep a roof over their heads. The condition of a wage slave has become ever present as the social safety net is cut back & birth rates drop not by choice but due to economic necessity.
👏👏👏
I don't think it's that's straight forward. I work in the gig economy and I like it better than working full time at a corporation. There's a steep learning curve because everyone's been conditioned to work the 9 to 5 but it's very possible to live a nice life while doing freelance, especially if you are highly skilled. The truth of the matter is that it's about power. For instance I worked this warehouse gig once. The work was HARD but since I didn't work there when it came time to leave I just left and never went back. I didn't have to worry about a manager being on my ass. Or about any of the bs that comes with being owned by a company because I have other routes of income. If that was my only route of income they would have WAY more leverage on me and I wouldn't be able to do all that much about it.
So yeah it's about power. It's about navigating it all in a way where you don't allow anyone to have so much leverage over you that you're doing backbreaking work just to survive.
@@gh0s1wav Well good for you. I note you don't say what you did/do as a freelance, so it is hard to judge the relevance of your comment.
I had a friend who was a freelance photographer, did varied work & got photos regularly in national newspapers. The problem was they would never pay him on time or claim they hadn't used a photo until he showed it to them.
I saw similar with self-employed plumbers & electricians who were always being paid 2 or 3 months after a job plus constantly being asked to lower their prices. The only ones I saw doing better were architects & building surveyors. therefore I think your experience is an outlier and not what the average person has out in the real world because if they were great at selling themselves or their product, were a good contract negotiator then they would be working in the gig economy or freelance.
LOL.
Rent is pissing your money away every month, it is for broke ass losers
Great video! I think the one point that is missing here is that even if you successfully start a business or find a way to subsist aside from wage labor, one's direction in life is still dictated by the need to make a living. Unless you are so financially secure that you can pursue any project you like, you will still be forced to exercise your freedom within the narrow constraints of capitalist survival and profit - and likely rely on exploiting other people or the environment. If people's needs were met and each person was free to direct their labor and energy as they see fit, people could play to their strengths and pursue the projects that are most necessary and meaningful for both individuals and the collective - an impossibility when the exercise of freedom is restricted by profit!
What I don't understand about arguments against "the narrow constraints of capitalist survival" is what is unconstrained survival? People's basic needs won't go away. Someone will work the fields, prepare and distribute food. If not ourselves, in some each-for-themselves daily toil for survival, we will be in a community, slaves to one another by whatever non-wage based social contracts we come up with.
" and likely rely on exploiting other people or the environment"
Exploiting other people? Or trading with them? You give them some money (or something else in trade), they render a service or produce a product for you. How is this in any way "exploitative"? As for the "environment", do you know of a way to eat that doesn't require land, air, or water?
"...people could play to their strengths and pursue the projects that are most necessary and meaningful for both individuals and the collective"
Who defines what is "most necessary and meaningful" for the "collective"? We are not collectively hungry, we don't think collectively, we don't collectively enjoy the same music or architectural style or outdoor activities or anything else. Even ardent fans of a given thing, say baseball, will disagree about the best teams, players etc.
@@CastmanDanautomation
@@CastmanDanThat’s why you let those workers democratically control their labor and all it produces. Somebody will do those jobs, and many people LOVE those jobs. They just need to receive 100% of the value their job produces as their wage, and have a prominent and powerful voice in how and why they do what they do. Then over time as those jobs get automated, you give the entirety of the value that that automation produces to the people who previously were working those jobs. Or, maybe they keep working that job alongside the automation in order to make even more money.
"narrow constraints of capitalist survival and profit "
Are little more than the narrow constraints of survival as dictated by nature. This would be obvious if you did not feel hunger, did not feel cold, being wet never bothered you, being naked never bothered you, you could sleep standing up, and you were entertained by nothing. There is no system in which you don't have to work to survive, at least until machines do everything, which is something only capitalism can create.
I'm very releived to observe that more young people are moved to expose and discard false dichotomies. I'm proud of being gen-x but the current generation is far wiser than we ever were.
My mother carries the same sentiment. She says she’s proud to be part of the generation that produced Gen z. She thinks we’re very insightful, reflective, responsible and temperate. I think that Gen x contained a big chunk of really great parents.
idk i think this guys an idiot. he mentions abolish wage slavery but after this entire video, there is no conception of what that would even look like. He makes the example in the beginning of us not being free from our need for water, admits thats ridiculous, then basically just describes the same thing. He feels people deserve to not have to make a living. thats a nice feeling. Nothing more.
They're not wiser.Is just an illusion.
@The-NightwatchYou care about the issues that REALLY matter, don’t you? You haven’t fallen for a manifactured moral panic by the far right that is suspiciously similar to nazi propaganda at all, right?
@The-Nightwatch these kids are way smarter than society gives them credit for. You see the world as male or female first and human second, where as they see it human first, period. They are confused byproducts of multiple misinformed generations, but I find their compassion and fair mindedness refreshing. Maybe if you actually spoke to them instead of quickly passing judgement you might find yourself suprised.
I just want to support your content, it's extermely well put together and interesting, so much that i fear it will not reach as many people as your art videos, but at the same time, it's maybe more important
Indentured servitude is a much better defining phrase, that's why in America there's a social security minimum age (which seems to rise every few years now) with the implication that one day you'll retire, that day, rarely comes on time if at all.
Wait. If a wife was the servant of her husband, then wouldn't the husband also be the servant of the wife being that he doesn't financially gain from her labor, but she does from his?
She frees him from the work of caring for the home and raising the children. If you're in my culture, she's also in charge of managing finances. So her contribution amounts to housekeeper, cook, nanny, nurse, teacher, and accountant.
He frees her from some labour outside the home and he frees her from work inside the home.
What do you mean he doesn’t financially gain from her labor? Have you seen the cost of childcare, housekeeping, personal assistants and personal chefs? If the stay at mom dies, the husband will have to replace what she does by outsourcing these tasks and that takes money. He is saving a lot from his wife taking on those household and childcare tasks. Not to mention that by staying at home, the wife is taking a hit on her own career since those gaps in her resume seem to scare many a potential employer if she chooses or has to find outside employment. The opportunity costs are not trivial. Being financially dependent on another also makes her vulnerable. If you give someone the power to feed you, you also give them the power to starve you.
@akiram6609 U're just proving the point. U're viewing only from a post-modern perspective. Do u realise we spoke in past tense? Also U're assuming a 1st world perspective as well. Just as in the past, these tasks aren't particularly expensive due basic supply and demand, there's more supply than demand. U're also assuming the wife doesn't also benefit from performing these tasks as well. U speak of gaps in resumes and such as if women entering the workforce didn't devalue labor, which stagnated her husband's wages. Once again, basic economics of supply and demand. When women entered the workforce it only has ever ultimately benefitted employers and the government. Employers got cheaper labor and the government doubled its taxable population. The reality is prior to women entering into the workforce, none of ur points were valid.
On another note, why do u see serving a boss necessarily being better than a husband? Isn't the employee still dependent on the employer or the government for her livelihood? In modern times, with the rise of single mother homes, those are statistically the worst living conditions for both the women and the children involved.
The reality is, it's not entirely obvious that the majority of women have improved their quality of life by leaving their stay at home roles to enter the labor force. It's NOT obvious at all.
@marielanomade Seem my response to the other person. Also, what culture are u from?
@@crosses101 I'm from Québec, Canada. It's heavily matriarcal. Wifes/ mothers make all major decisions regarding children (pick their school, and for mixed families, pick their religion and native tongue). Women are expected to budget the household and handle taxes. Not all families are like this, but the expectations are there, on top of child-rearing and housekeeping.
This is awesome, I have two collage art pieces on the subject of wage slavery.
How can I see them?
Thank you for taking the time to discuss this issue.
So, he "was" against slavery until he realized there are White slaves? WOW....
Told y'all slavery is just an antiwhite pretext.
What the actual fuck are you talking about
Slavery was not predominant in the North. And if anyone is attacked on a collective scale through corpratism it's Westernkind. Not Africankind.
I would also add that a wage slave is an individual who has less of an ability to bargain for the conditions of his employment than the employer. It’s why unions have all but been dismantled by corporate entities.
...Corporate entities are PPPs. Daddy Government is your Master, not other citizens.
@@3Torts -Governments run on money. Money in America is now privatized (Fed Reserve and banks). Corporations have more influence over public policy than ordinary citizens do. Corporate Lobbyists spend more time on Capitol Hill than regular Joes. They have the ear and purse strings of our representatives in Congress, therefore, government is beholden to corporate interests.
...Lol Public Private Partnerships are not a Government beholden to Corporations. Neither large private co-operations nor the Government are beholden to the other... However, when the Government controls the Reserve, the printer, the regulations, the laws, the taxes. The Government is walking the dog, but regardless the point is moot. Money Printer goes brrr and these two entities are like blades on a pair of scissors at this point.
Public Private Partnerships can only exist with Daddy Government is in the mix. We live in a USSA style culture run by Oligarchs and Oligarchies. There should be a separation of Economics and State, imo. Freedom to practice. If the people don't control their* mediums of exchange, then they are not free and Daddy Gov/Oligarchies are in control. The consumer's one job is literally to regulate the market. Daddy needs to kick rocks with the 50+ 3 letter bureaus and synthetic theft presented as moral charity. We haven't had a free or Capital based market since 1971 and more realistically since 1913. We live in a subsidized, domesticated, standardized environment and to pretend otherwise would be delusional. People really wonder why our culture is standardized and blame evil corporations while ignoring subsectors like music/entertainment for example. Even our music is regulated and standardized via PPPs... (see Telecommunications Act of '96)
Cheers.
@@spocktiberius2456
STORM THE CAPITOL
totally unrelated comment but it came to mind while watching this video so im leaving it here - i worked as a groundskeeper for a fairly large apartment complex (300+ units and the hundred or so acres around it) and was able to determine that around 4 - 9 million pounds of litter gets dropped on the ground across the united states every single day. if you want to know why the earth climate will totally collapse, its because we moved too much of its stuff too far too often.
Animal agriculture is BY FAR the most destructive force on the planet, in every aspect, according to the science. It occupies nearly 1/3 of all land, has deforrested nearly half the worlds forrest, emmits far mote methane, nitrus oxide (strongest climate gasses) than anything else, pollutes oceans to make ocean dead zones, emmits more greenhouse gasses than all transport combined, kills off biodiversity, leaves masses of plastic in the ocean from fishing, and robs the climate of any chance of capturing the gasses and healthing through the mass destruction of wild nature and trees.
We simply cannot have a sustainable climate without ending animal agriculture asap. Humans do not need to eat dead animals or breastfeed from cows for excellent health. In fact, those who eat little to no animal producs live the longest and have the least disease.
Eating animals is killing us, killing animals, killing earth.
STORM THE CAPITOL
If you can be enslaved while earning income, then what defines slavery? I think slavery is defined as the absence of Authority over one's Responsibility.
There is this tone-deaf cry for people to assume responsibility over this or that, you see this in the work place, as a bill to one's character always sent by people who seemingly relish at the chance to divorce Authority and Responsibility. Simply put it rests within our social hierarchy that people desire to do this for social status. AND THAT is the true prize.
I've heard arguments that the slavery ends with automation. I don't think so. There is something profoundly evil in the hearts of men, that drives them to lord over others. And I think it rests within man's relationship with Civilization.
I really appreciate this conversation, though its pretty hilarious hearing the pro slavery view sometimes and how out of touch it is. What I appreciate though is that often those arguments still make real observations about life and economics, or offer a perspective that we should consider even if we do outright think its wrong. It makes me wonder what does Adam Smith say about these things? What does Marx say? People may be surprised to discover that what these two observe are very similar, though their conclusions are very different. So i do support learning from those we may disagree with and this was an awesome presentation on the subject.
It feels like slavery because we cant ever get out of living paycheck to paycheck, we can't ever own property, we can't ever escape the system of having to do what another tells you to do to survive. Its that general feeling that you don't really have a choice and won't ever get out. That may not really be true honestly since a lot of people do get out eventually, but a lot don't and work until the day they die. Whats most frustrating is the argument about money is often done using theory instead of reality. The theory that its a free market and if employees are unhappy they can leave and the employer will be forced to improve pay or conditions otherwise they will not have employees. But claims like that are true only sometimes. In reality as we all know the company has significantly more power and leverage. When you quit a job you no longer have money to pay for life necessities. When they lose an employee they merely miss out on a portion of production and money. The stakes are nowhere near the same and thus the playing field is not set for true competition. Until the public can have conversation based on the reality the topic will never progress.
The right to choose one's master is only a benefit if there is a better master to be had. There are no better jobs available to us, we can merely choose which devil to serve
The saying that you have to work for an employer forever is not true but was planted in you through education. There are thousands of freelance and one person jobs you can do. Be a plumber or lawyer or whatever. I started a home restoration business from practically nothing. I would buy tools as the job required, then started buying some advertising. I never sought to exploit workers to earn millions but i never had to be employed. Iam not excessively smart or anything, just that i think for myself no matter how many times i am told something. Employment never made sense to me. Now im closing to 50, i am happy with the way i went.
We will always support this channel. They have the best insights.
@@alfwok That doesn't sound so good. . .
Hopefully he can build enough capital through advertising and monetizing his wonderful videos to create an economic system of workers to help build and film his video empire.
Have multiple routes of income so that no one has so much leverage over you that you become their slave.
At that point, you're dedicating the vast majority of your time to multiple slave owners. Mobility between slave owners is still a form of slavery. Complete independence is key.
So the question is raised: Who owns the land and how did they get it?
What does Adam Smith have to do with Capitalism? If you search Wealth of Nations for 'education' you will find Eighty Occurrences. Smith wrote "read, write and account" multiple times.
The United States could have made "accounting/finance" mandatory in high schools since Sputnik. How often have you heard economists suggest any such thing?
before they invented race, they practiced on the irish. i live in the northeastern united states. except for those straight off the boat, we're all part irish here, for thousands of miles around, even our blacks and indians (but probably not actual indians, for a generation or two, excepting, you know, the english were there a while too, and they bring their irish with 'em)
vaping and smoking are bad in different ways. one may or may not be worse than the other, but one is taxed so highly, for so long now, the government relies on their sales as much as tobacco companies. this is also a metaphor, if you follow
It is the duty of the proletariat to seize the means of production by purchasing shared ownership of the corporation through stocks and then reinvesting the dividends.
Based as fuck lol
STORM THE CAPITOL
@@Fudgeyum2122STORM THE CAPITOL
It is my observation that when someone says something is "obviously true," it is not obvious, that instead he is spouting the approved belief of some group. If something is truly obvious, it doesn't need to be said.
You have a very long-winded intro that is really only intended to convey the message "I hold approved beliefs, don't just shun me." I am going to remind you that slavery goes back to the dawn of recorded history. If you are going to tell me that most of humanity saw themselves as villains, you show that you are untrustworthy.
Such a beautiful and easy to understand content. I wish you protect this content and no abuser in any form could bring it down :)
We have all been wage slaves for the last 150 years. It’s true when goods on the outside do up 10 percent and your wages go up 2 percent. Doesn’t take a phd to tell you the working people are screwed! Bottom line.
I am not sure what kind of people watch this channel, but I’m probably not one of you. That being said, I think we may agree on some things. Perhaps the following.
You can’t get out of the system. You can’t own anything. If it can be taken from you for not paying some fee or tax, it’s not yours. You’re renting it from the government. You rent EVERYTHING! So the capitalist beef; I don’t know if the anger is being applied appropriately. A truly capitalist, free market system, would be structured in such a way that participation was voluntary. You could enter the fray, earn some pay, then go your own way. That’s not what we have here. The market isn’t the master, the government is. So… and this may ruffle some feathers. The biggest problem with capitalism, seems to be the socialism woven throughout it.
If you had pure free market capitalism, without any government regulating it, you'd see child labor make a comeback overnight.
You'd see all sorts of abuses in the workplace. You'd see wealthy corporations paying you 1 dollar per hour (we already see it in international markets without workers' rights like Fiverr and Upwork). You'd see capitalists trying to import more slaves to crush your wages and make you more replaceable. Not to mention that, due to the compounding effect of money, if you didn't have taxation all the wealth would accumulate at the top even more than now, resulting in the bottom being in absolute poverty, destabilizing the whole society and possibly resulting in revolts and the masters getting killed. So no, pure capitalism doesn't work, that's why the State needs to set boundaries to prevent absolute predatory behavior from the capitalists.
@@clipkut4979 I disagree. In a voluntary system, nobody would work for $1. Operative word being voluntary. You understand that, which is why you brought slavery into the conversation. Without slavery, the things you’ve described wouldn’t happen. Slavery was also a government institution. So your solution to government created problems, seems to be more or different government.
@@mrwojna People are already "voluntarily" working for 1$ per hour and I even told you where to find them, this is not up to debate. You don't need slavery for that to happen, you only need an environment that encourages a race to the bottom, a huge pool of people, and a lack of government regulating the wages and employer/employee dynamic. The things I described happen without slavery every day. Abuse in the workplace? If you have a zero-hour contract you do what you're told or you're fired, plenty of abuse there. I worked a 22 hour shift myself once (in the UK btw), which is total violence, but it's either that or "you're not a team player" and you're fired. Capitalists importing people to crush your wages? It happens without slavery today. Migrants are regularly used by capitalists with below-poverty wages that undercut the local workers. This allows the capitalists to not be forced to negotiate with local workers and raise wages. Or they just move the jobs/production overseas where they're still allowed to exploit and pay pennies. These are not government-created problems, but issues baked into capitalism. The government's job is to do damage control and prevent the capitalists from going batshit crazy and predatory. By saying "No you can't employ kids". "No you can't work people in 20hrs shift" "No you can't fire people without reason" "No you, can't pay 1$ per hour your employees (but you can your overseas contractors)"
your definition of ownership is stupid and by logic of your definition there is no such thing as ownership
They had this problem fixed in the Old Testament in the time of the Judges. The two biggest problems with modern capitalism are the concentration of wealth into the hands of an ever smaller minority and the accumulation of debt. The real current problem isn't wage slavery, its debt slavery. Currently fewer than 100 people on planet earth possess more wealth than the poorest 50% of humanity. At the same time the financial industry is sitting on $2.5 Quadrillion(2,500 Trillion) in debt, deficit and unfunded legal liabilities.
If you look in the Old Testament, what you see is that when ancient Israel was founded, every man was given his own equal share of land. Every 50 years Israel would have a Jubilee year, when all debts were cancelled, and all men returned to the land of their fathers, which is to say, any land purchased in the prior 50 years was only leased out, and the lease expired in the jubilee year, the original family that owned the land retook possession without having to pay the lease purchaser. So ancient Israel didn't just have a time stamp currency, they had an entire time stamp economy. One other feature was that all slaves were freed in the Jubilee year. There was no king in the time of judges, it was called judges because judges were either elected or appointed at the local level, each property was the owners private kingdom, each man possessed his own independent means of production because he was a land owner. The hereditary priests were responsible for caring for the poor and the sick, they received a 10% tithe from the population, which is far more reasonable than our modern tax system where close to half of all wages go to paying taxes. Not only was there no king or royal family, there was no standing army, no government bureaucracy, as mentioned, each landowner was his own ruler of his own little kingdom, so he was his own boss, his own master and a slave of himself and no other unless he made a lot of very bad mistakes or had a long string of bad luck. Apart from that, so long as he didn't get drunk and gamble away his property, he would not fall into wage slavery or debt slavery. What ever misfortune caused him to lease out his land to cover expenses, either he or his children would retake possession in the Jubilee year. The Nation was ruled over by the Supreme Being, there was no parliament or republic, the laws couldn't be altered, so life liberty and property were safe from any legislature in session. They had to screw it all up of course.
I worked on Wall Street as a young man on the trading floor at a major brokerage. I remember the first time I saw two armed security guards escort a man sitting next to me to HR and then out the building. He had worked there for about 30 years and had done nothing wrong. He simply was not needed anymore, salary could be replaced with lower one. That was the first time I realized what was being talked about here. I went on to work as a director of leasing in several new luxury high rise buildings in NYC. Several years no increases in salary were given despite record profits. Moral of the story, don't get involved in wage slavery. Look to work as a sole proprietor, small business owner, licensed professional, independent tradesperson, or freelancer to name a few. Once you accept money for your time, they've got you and it's very hard to pull out of it when you have bills to pay.
"21st Century Workers are completely fine and emancipated... Contemporary Workers have the best living standards in the history of humanity, they have access to food from all over the world, house themselves, have children who can go to school and not have to work until they're at least teenagers, they have access to incredible technology, they can retire at decent ages... We're far from the worker who toiled sixteen hours a day and who could be fired at any moment."
In some places, but definitely not in the Global South.
In a capitalist system, the capitalist doesn’t exist without the laborer because the workers are also the consumers. Both are necessary for the system to work. The problem with such a system evolves around the level of comfort each party experiences. The optimum balance of such a system is one where both parties are satisfied with the their level of lifestyle. When one or both parties are unhappy with their lifestyle problems ensue. The goal of capitalism should be to ensure that all parties are at the very least comfortable with the lifestyle they experience. The standard should be set at a level all can reasonably agree upon.
Taxes make a person more of a slave than their wages. We are currently losing 50%+ of our incomes to all forms of taxation, and we were perfectly capable of running govt and society before the income tax was started in 1913 (income tax was not given fully to the middle class worker until WW2 to "help" pay for the war). When I pay taxes I don't have a say where my money goes, and it goes to programs that I will never benefit from, while my own basic needs do are not taken care of first (I pay for others to have health care before I can even fully afford my own). We don't live under capitalism right now in the USA. We live under a socialist crony-capitalism oligarchy hybrid. I want the govt smaller and out of my life, NOT bigger. When has bigger govt ever been in the interest of the little guy? It is a false pretense to enslave us. Companies would have a much harder time making us their slaves if they did not have the help of the govt passing laws in their favor.
i believe capitalism begins at he same point in history as the western european age of colonialism and the north atlantic slave trade, about that same time race and racism were invented to justify the dehumanization necessary to such a system and manifest still in the on-going genocide against people of african descent, and other "black " and "brown" people. to this day. there were fore runners to all these but together the led to the nightmare dystopia of today. i in no way mean to minimize the particularly cruel system of the north atlantic slave trade by saying this. there is more than one intolerable thing in history. i also intend to clearly state my belief that forced pregnancy and military conscription are also forms of slavery
I really liked the bit at the end where you show that wage slavery at least provides an exit. You will always need someone to provide money/lodging for you until you become financially independant. The whole point of capitalism is to let as many people as possible break out of that cycle.
One very minor counter point, working for yourself isn't technically freedom either by your definition. You still need others to give your goods value and provide compensation for them. So really it's just another way to sell your labor. Even if you go build a honestead and are entirely self-sustaining, you have to pay the government in the form of taxes; which you need money for, which means you have to trade labor/goods for money.
Essentially, we will never attain true freedom. We can only decide where on the spectrum between freedom and security we want society to run.
Lack of wages isn't what defines slavery any more than having a wage defines freedom. Do you feel free?
Here's the thing: slaves can totally earn wages. Isn't debt repayment the reason for most slavery, at least according to those who wouldn't mind returning to that institution?
I always ask people, "how much would you need to get paid to accept being enslaved?"
My favourite anarchist art channel ❤
So wage slavery is something kind of similar to slavery in the Roman Empire where slaves could eventually buy their freedom?
Only as a birthday gift to thier child who have wished thier slave be free.
@@celiacruzazucar6630that is not how it worked in Rome
Classes do not exist in a liberal society. There is simply a gradual degree of worth of property, that can be freely exchanged, which makes the type of property meaningless.
I've been thinking so much about the current state of economy and how hard it is often to be valued even if you have a lot to offer.
Is there any modern economic theory that proposes something different? I ask to you if you've read something like that, as I'm not versed in this topic whatsoever
How about socialism? And I don't mean the right wing strawman of the caricature of "Socialism is when the gubermint does something" or any authoritarian framework like the Soviets, CCP, etc. I mean socialism as it is originally intended, as in economic democracy, workplace democracy, worker co-operatives. As in workers owning the means of production. As Americans, we value democracy in everything except the economy and workplace. Why is that?
We subject ourselves to authoritarian workplaces where we have no say and we are lorded over by a manager or boss that we didn't elect. In a worker cooperative, the workers all own and manage the workplace. They elect their managers and vote on company policies and workplace policies rather than having it be dictated to them by a single person. Look at Mondragon. Maybe search this type of stuff up.
Also, never forget this in regards to the massive wealth inequality and how the existence of billionaires is an abhorrence.
1 million seconds is 12 days.
1 billion seconds is 30 years.
Billionaires are parasites.
@karanraj8930 “Nothing is preventing you” does not automatically make something easy or even possible to do. There is nothing stopping you from being a billionaire or astronaut.
And did you disagree with anything he said orrrr?
@@ajiththomas2465thank you those are the same points I make constantly as well. Adults are more like children when it comes to understanding the difference between a million and a billion.
@karanraj8930you found your way into lefty conversation only to crap on it, lol. Congrats
@@ajiththomas2465 "As Americans, we value democracy in everything except the economy and workplace. Why is that? "
Because majority rule doesn't work for economic matters. Should the janitorial staff have an equal vote on the new engineering specs? Should the accounting department get an equal vote on what the art department is doing? As a society, why should we collectively vote on, say, our favorite beverage? It is far better to let Peter to choose Coke, Paul to choose Pepsi, and John to choose Dr. Pepper...or Orange Juice, or Milk, or whatever. Democracy is good for things like deciding on public expenditure, but not much else.
"We subject ourselves to authoritarian workplaces where we have no say and we are lorded over by a manager or boss that we didn't elect."
You voluntarily chose to work there. And you can leave. So you elect a manager...then what? For how long? What about the 49% who didn't vote for him or her do? And you know what? You are free under capitalism to form any number of ownership models and run the business as democratically as you like. Profit sharing, co-ops, stock options, sole proprietorships, LLCs, freelancing/consulting, sales commission models, and so on. Who knows? You might be very successful.
"I mean socialism as it is originally intended"
Intended by whom? The racist and Antiemetic Marx? And let's not forget the idea that he popularized: "From each according to ability, to each according to need" This is the essence of slavery. After all, a slave is expected to give maximum output according to his or her ability, but is given only the bare minimum to meet the needs required to keep them from dropping dead. The only difference in Marx's mind is that the "collective" is the slave master, and not a single individual.
"I want a nation of workers, not thinkers" - John D Rockefeller
STORM THE CAPITOL
The wage slave subject always dismisses liberty by saying freedom is just too hard. Therefore wage earners are utterly stuck. Perhaps they do not have the faculties to survive on their own. That is really outside of the discussion. If indeed they are that disabled it is probably well enough that they are perpetually employed . It s a very big world with much opportunity and having the liberty to walk away while simultaneously having your life and property protected by law is far from slavery. More over, my current opinion is that, the skoowalls program young minds into believing the world owes them something more than the animated contest for freedom. Samual Adams mentions this in his famous quote from 1776.
In parting I suggest using jobs to learn how an entrepreneur builds wealth and then implementing the great struggles and risks on your own. Otherwise enjoy the tranquility of servitude. May your chains sit lightly. Even if they are a construct of your head.
I'm always ecstatic,when I come across videos/info,like this
I wish for those of us
who are,acutely aware of the injustice,and inhumane system of capitalism,could escape it.
8 hours a day,when you commute to and from the prison job,only to arrive home,to prepare to go back,to the prison job,being overjoyed,when you,get time out from prison cell
8 hrs adds up to a lifetime,of imprisonment.
...lol. Imagine believing we live in a Capitalist system while living in the USSA or any one of the lesser SOcialist nations. Domesticated dork.
according to the lie of the tragedy of the commons, a private owner has more incentive not to overuse their land, and yet since private ownership became the norm destructive exploitation has grown to a rate which threatens us all, and maybe all life, excepting, idk, tardigrades
Chattel slavery involved brutal beatings, physical and psychological torture, murders, sexual assault, rape, forced incest, infanticide, etc.
Wage slavery sucks, but it's nothing close to chattel slavery.
You know a system is inherently flawed, if one party of that system would never want to be in the position of the other party of that system. The capitalist and the labor are codependent. If they both need each other, is it fair that one feel as though they are less than the other? An economic system works at its optimum level when all parties feel equally valued.
Quit halfway through. Seems to ramble on without making a stance and defending it. One minute he sounds like he is anticapitalist, the next he seems to be defending it. In the end I just quit caring what was being said.
Sounds like a skill issue. Complex issues require complex thought I guess.
Marx discussed this in conceptualizing surplus value. Every wage worker and every slave worked part of the day “for themselves” (that is, to cover the cost of their wage or room/board, respectively) and the remainder is harvested by the owner. And depending on cost of living, the wage worker has significantly more of their labor value taken than the slave. Marx did not disqualify the differences in physical liberty that exist between to two, but did draw the comparison to show how much better, arguably, wage slavery was for the owner class than slavery was.
As long as we Must Work, we are Not Free. (J. R. “Bob” Dobbs)
My family told me that if I studied hard I would by and by get into a well paid profession and become well off. Alas! In the real world the professional institutions that have the power to give qualifications to students maintain blacklists of students with powerful enemies who want to suppress them. They stop taking examinations when they realisze they are barred by blacklist. They are then back at the beginning. What can they do? Nothing :)
8:00 I am a business owner. I started at 19 with NOTHING. Don’t give up on your dream kids
Sure everybody had "nothing"
@@blub-tf6rt you’re capable of greatness too
If you see this, it means I'm streaming right now on Twitch! Come hang out!!! twitch.tv/germinaal
An business owner goes to work every day hoping he makes some money. An employee goes to know knowing they are. Its not nearly as one sided as you suggest. Most businesses fail and many entrepreneurs go back to being employees because its an easier and more predictable life.
I can't watch a video where the anticipated audience is a gaggle of snowflakes who shudder at concepts like slavery itself. I'm not a modern moron largely because I grew up at a time of freedom and responsibility. I don't expect someone to assume that I'm so weak that information is detrimental to me. Shame!
you said slaves don't have wages by definition, but that's not true. the legal slavery in usa included wages, just not enough to live and no choice to leave.
Could you please come back to the old topics of art you used to cover in your videos? You had the best flow and I just cant find another creator to speak abt art the same way as you do.
Some people claimed that the humane slave owner was worse the cruel slave owner because it was obvious how evil the cruel one was.
You say that obviously slavery is worse than wage slavery, but that is not obvious at all.
Personally, I think both are wrong. However, there are many forms of both.
And it is not at all clear that some forms of wage slavery are in any way superior to some forms of ordinary slavery.
Into this mix of slavery, wage slavery is also late Western Roman Empire invention feudalism.
Feudalism or as I like to call it free-range slavery. Your slaves are nominally free but they're typically tied to the land and they don't really have any alternatives anyway. This is much the same with many placed in the wage slave position.
And as slave owners point out, whereas the person who officially owns another person feels some moral obligation to look after that person when they get old. Or at least that's the way some slave owners thought. The wage slave is free to choose and has rights and is not the responsibility of anyone but themselves (in the nonsense, false consciousness, they are made to believe). So after you, as a business owner, may have used their services throughout their life, you have no moral obligation to look after them. You can discard them. In fact, it's not even looked as you discarding them, because they were free all along, whereas if you just gave your slave, his or her freedom when they were old and could no longer work, a slave society might look badly on you for doing that.
But society does not look badly on the business owner, when one of their employees has been used up and left to fend for themselves when they are old.
And then as well as being wage slaves. You can also turn them into debt slaves as happens in many countries where they can't earn enough to live so they have to borrow and then they feel morally obligated to repay their debt and so you get them to sell one of their kidneys and then they can't work at all because they're ill.
But their predicament is not your fault or at least that's the way those societies tend to view debt slavery and wage slavery. Those who profit have no obligation towards its victims.
So what you think is obvious is not so obvious to others. Do these wage slaves and debt slaves really have freedom when compared to an ordinary slave or is it simply an illusion?
I’m going to be honest, I much preferred the shorter, more brief art analysis videos you made before. Don’t get me wrong these videos are great in their own way, but there was just something spectacular coming on TH-cam weekly to learn something new about art. Still love your though, keep it up.
...Should have stayed in his lane. Socialists are rarely able to do so, however.
I would simply like to say, you put together a very great argument and presented it very well. For an argument such as this, dealing with significant topics, it’s extremely important to create a very balanced, objective, and neutral argument and to present it well, all of which you have done. 👍🏻
I would not call this balanced. Instead it is weighted to one side. Guess which one?
Fabulous intro! Looking forward to your take!
Dudex you get it and cover all the context. I dig it.
this is why eventually capitalism will have to go, ultimately in capitalistic society the elite will eventually goble up all opportunities and monopolise entire markets (which has already happened), at that point over 90% of country population becomes "slaves", capitalism works best in new emerging markets not in old established ones. You cant have people being slaves for multiple generations with worsening conditions and have a happy society, so ultimately something has to change, I really hope we will not go in circles however because what I see is people wanting to bring back socialism, which is a really bad idea.
I’d argue that the way we commoditize each other is equivalent to dehumanization. Corporations also do this with “Human Resources” - as humans are just another commodity on their balance sheet. In fact, that’s what it is, since humans can be laid off and eliminated from a balance sheet.
There is no "master". All dualities are but false dichotomies for plebeians. Reality is one big grey area plagued by the formality, and absolutism of our subjective minds. Extremes are imaginary- they represent black and white, all or nothing thinking- which is pure fallacy of thought. As if people who were once slaves didn't at some point become "masters". Your boss is beholden to his boss, and so forth, until you get to the owner, who is beholden to criminals, politicians, judges, nature, and circumstance. Sovereignty is an illusion. Ownership is an illusion. Control is an illusion.
But guns are not an illusion.
we ourselves need work...civilisation depends on the energy of all its citiizens. i get your point. but see no alternative. just ensure upward social mobility and people would work twice as hard and be happy too. if nobody works at all they will all be perfectly free corpses. [starved frozen and etc]...
Please understand there is a difference between chattel slavery and debt slavery. The harsh conditions, the brutality, torture, exploitation, rape, separation of family. Etc
You are overthinking this. In the Frederick Douglass quote the master does not choose to give the wage.
Wages are set by the market. Believe me, small business owners would try to push that wage down as much as they could, but then employees would just go somewhere else.
Masters choose minimum wage because he got abundant supply of workers to choose from and he can easily replace workers with workers who would work for minimum wage.
Bs bro
@@FactsCountdownthat’s not how it works in practice. We have seen this with the Nordic countries that completely removed government involvement with wages and abolished minimum wage. Wages actually increased for a few reasons, one they no longer knew how what the minimum was that they could get away with paying employees so employers had to guess how much to pay employees and ended up paying more to keep them around and two, everyone was doing the first thing so employees had their pick of jobs and could easily leave their position for a better paying one if the employer did not keep up. With this change they went from struggling socialist economies to some of the wealthiest countries in Europe by adopting a more libertarian economy. A similar thing is currently happening in Argentina.
@@FactsCountdownand the modern version you got that not by moving which people in or out to be your employees but by moving your job in or out through outsourcing or using excessively cheap migrant workers to do the job
ironic people still insist that excessively cheap labor as somewhat NOT stealing your job
In most every case, at-will employees are free to leave anytime and go anywhere they desire. Too often, it's the comfort of the status-quo, or "golden handcuffs" that keep them bound.
One of the best channels on youtube, keep up the good work 🦀
Yo this was helpful and I totally dig it. I will check out more over time before Patreoning but keep doing your thing. The world needs your view and information.
Although the exact details of work may arguably be better in modernity, the nature of said work is miserable. Working in a field for 5 hours with a 3 hour break is significantly less miserable than having a corporate job where you sit in an office all day and then go home and worry about shit you need to do tomorrow (or have your boss hound you rest of the evening).
If this is the case, why did black families have a much higher rate of home ownership in the 1950's, and 60's?
Ok tucker fanboy
@@blub-tf6rt Ad hominem.
@@blub-tf6rt You obsess over the subject, rather than the argument the subject is presenting.
@@blub-tf6rt It's because you have too much cognitive dissonance to actually debate anything.
there was a booming housing expansion (partly because of returning servicemen) resulting in excess supply, which in itself can only happen (commercially) within a capitalist system
basically, despite the segregation and general racism, capitalism and private ownership triumphs over whatever today's stuff
The problem with the socialist rhetoric is that it makes assumptions that things from capitalism would still exists under socialism. Remember since there's no capitalist class, there's no one to just have money or stuff for you to split with your comrades. You have to make it all yourself, which you are currently free to do.
Wild animals are the only completely free beings, and you are free to go into survivalism, but surprisingly most don't want to.
Best comment.
I think you and @renmakesmusic would have an engaging discussion. Money Game Part 2 may interest you.
He doesn't copyright, so it would be possible to play during a livestream without fear of a strike.
Canvas pleasee I got work tomorrow!😭✋🏽 (great video!) will be joining Patreon
STORM THE CAPITOL
The quote at the 3:40 mark describes serfdom, not capitalism. As if class mobility isn't a thing. America has more class mobility than any other nation on earth.
Stuff like this made this video hard to sit through.
Good analysis. It goes to show the nuance involved in property and authority is far more grey than a simple black and white dichotomy. This is what the Bible understood, and why Jesus didn't condemn slavery outright. Despite the superficiality of atheist condemnation, it seems a person is almost always in a master/slave relationship and freedom involves choosing who you want to be your master.
The fallacies/untrue statements in this video include:
The entire idea of wage slavery (which assumes there is no way to make money but to work for someone or own equipment). (Red herring fallacy, false dilemma fallacy)
The definition of wage slavery which is so broad that basically everyone is included. (Moving the goalpost)
The false premise put forth that you need to "obey the commands of the capitalists (whoever that is) to survive." (Either/or fallacy, false dilemma fallacy)
The claim that you need to sell your abilities because you have no way of controlling the "means of production" (whatever that is). (Begging the question fallacy, cost fallacy)
The transition from slavery to current working conditions. (Non sequitur fallacy)
The ideas put forth in the video are worth addressing. But to make the assumption that you either work for someone or starve is ignorant of the opportunities of modern times. There are plenty of ways to create your own sources of income and have no "master" (the video also assumes that any kind of hierarchy is inherently bad which is not necessarily true either) which include things like being a youtuber, being a streamer, being a developer, being an online shop owner, ride hailing, selling personally made goods, finding opportunities to be a middleman in B2B or B2C situations, owning a website, etc.
The idea that you aren't truly free until you don't work for someone and can be politically independent is certainly one to aspire to. So, we should be advocating for 1) better education to help give everyone an equal footing for intelligence and self development and 2) more accessible opportunities to create your own source of income instead of manufacturing/retail/customer service roles.
I agree the points in the essay are vague and broadly defined. You could also call the business owner a slave simply based on the fact he/she relies upon revenue from clients/customers to survive. An exchange of services, goods, or in the example of labor, time, for money does not equate to slavery simply based on the fact both parties consent to the transaction, under fair market conditions of course.
This is not to say that corruption, exploitation, and subversion of personal freedom do not happen in the labor market.
What policies would facilitate a better education for all? Advocating for more “accessible opportunities” is fine but is so vague that it feels like a meaningless platitude.
I dead couldn’t sit through this video cause of these things.
Couldn’t put a name on everything, but I understood things were being misrepresented for the goals of his argument.
Video is very educational. Also your hair looks wonderful
I like how you've enabled ads on your videos, very anti-capitalist of you.
He's anti wage slave... Not anti money hahaha
Great points. Well presented and a great conversation starter. Thank you.
Jay-Z quote, you can't be free until you own your own.
Considering that debt peonage actually existed, this is kinda distasteful. Cause debt slavery is what you meant. Chattel slavery will never be comparable.
Key difference. I just couldn’t make it through this, and people who were watching this and agreeing just don’t understand the original difference.
The wage slave concept is central to understanding why, like my union the IWW, I seek to abolish the wage system (that is the abolition of money and markets)
And what would you replace them with?
Slavery is an abomination that allows one person to do whatever they want to another person not just the labor gained . Slaves arent guaranteed some old age care or health care or even decent food either. A person is legally allowed to walk away from their wage " slavery"in most cases. If they aren't then it is truly slavery. Of course, if enough people refuse to work for an employer that employer loses his power.
in dune frank herbert refers to the concept of hydrolic dictatorship, which while it obviously can, as the name implies, refer to control over the water supply, may also refer to a monopoly on other necessities such as petroleum, as 20th and 21st century earth, or the spice melange, as in the duniverse
You will never be free. No one has ever been free. That is for the simple fact that no one ever gave their consent before being plopped down in this life. Not only that, but we were plopped down with this innate desire to survive at all costs. So, no matter how you decide to survive, you will always be a slave to that innate desire!!!!
Capitalism at worst is slavery. And there's a lot, of that, in USA especially.
A hunter gatherer is a slave to survival. It’s called making a living. You can work for bread or grow wheat and make bread. Either way, it’s work
Wow this was very insightful. Thanks for the time and effort you put into this.
You say labor “has no choice”. That’s what qualifies one as a “slave”.
Child support under the threat of imprisonment is modern slavery-against Men. Indentured servitude, at the very least.
It will never be the same because you can get a bit ahead in capitalism with very little to begin with - if you work steadily in a job and save some money to start a side hustle like an ecommerce store (eBay). You absolutely need an education of some sort to achieve this though, even if that’s self education. But a lot of money can come through the internet whilst working from your living room, or even bedroom.