“What has Jerusalem to do with Athens, the Church with the Academy, the Christian with the heretic?… After Jesus we have no need of speculation, after the Gospel no need of research.”
Nietzche and Heidegger tend to identify Philosophy or Denken with what the Tradition would have understood as Theology. Strauss separates the two. Strauss was both secular yet somehow open to revelation as a possible Jewish alternative to philosophy, so that for him it was either man's prescription or God's commands. Aquinas distinguishes what Heidegger identifies and Strauss separates. I think Strauss is more instructive by far philosophically than Heideggeer ; even if we understand philosophy as denken. Heidegger made this possible. Yet Strauss and Aquinas understand philosophy in a Pre-modern sense. For Strauss it is incompatible to take Creation as being true while being a philosopher. Not so with Aquinas. Many today would say who cares and good riddance to both. Forgetting the many for a moment. Who may be right between such great men whose opinions are worth considering.
Strauss distinguished faith from rationality and said Thomas has both. At the same time he sophisticlly claimed faith is a version of rationality. Strauss stands and falls with Samuel Scolnokov and myself on the ad hominem question as one's own usage rather than correctness and error as found in the second most important Platonic dialogue according to Scolnokov, the Euthedemus. Socrates 'claim that the sophist brothers pursue their object "manfully" might be extended to the bouquet of Strauss 'deeds and work.
@@letdaseinlive I do understand you now. I needed some time to let your constructions and persuasions sink in. So thanks. Atheists from " the right" are always more instructive.
![[TH] 2024 PMSL SEA Finals D2 | Fall | ต้องรักษาฟอร์ม อย่ายอมให้ใครแซง](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/x38QsGn7A3M/mqdefault.jpg)
mr. ( herr) leo strauss is of course a perfect product ( language, bildung, gymnasium, university) of german culture...
Amazing!
“What has Jerusalem to do with Athens, the Church with the Academy, the Christian with the heretic?… After Jesus we have no need of speculation, after the Gospel no need of research.”
is it possible adding subtitles?
Nietzche and Heidegger tend to identify Philosophy or Denken with what the Tradition would have understood as Theology. Strauss separates the two. Strauss was both secular yet somehow open to revelation as a possible Jewish alternative to philosophy, so that for him it was either man's prescription or God's commands. Aquinas distinguishes what Heidegger identifies and Strauss separates. I think Strauss is more instructive by far philosophically than Heideggeer ; even if we understand philosophy as denken. Heidegger made this possible. Yet Strauss and Aquinas understand philosophy in a Pre-modern sense. For Strauss it is incompatible to take Creation as being true while being a philosopher. Not so with Aquinas. Many today would say who cares and good riddance to both. Forgetting the many for a moment. Who may be right between such great men whose opinions are worth considering.
Strauss distinguished faith from rationality and said Thomas has both. At the same time he sophisticlly claimed faith is a version of rationality. Strauss stands and falls with Samuel Scolnokov and myself on the ad hominem question as one's own usage rather than correctness and error as found in the second most important Platonic dialogue according to Scolnokov, the Euthedemus. Socrates 'claim that the sophist brothers pursue their object "manfully" might be extended to the bouquet of Strauss 'deeds and work.
@@letdaseinliveI cannot understand your reply.
@@williambuysse5459 That's sad for you.
@@letdaseinlive I will try to remain hopeful. Take care
@@letdaseinlive I do understand you now. I needed some time to let your constructions and persuasions sink in. So thanks. Atheists from " the right" are always more instructive.