Robert B. Pippin on Politics Today, Hegel, Heidegger, Cinema...and more!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 24

  • @ZizekandSoOn
    @ZizekandSoOn ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Been looking forward to this one!

  • @erkankant
    @erkankant ปีที่แล้ว +7

    there we go

  • @robertalenrichter
    @robertalenrichter หลายเดือนก่อน

    I had exactly the same question about the Barbie movie. Quite astonishing.

  • @chrishorner7679
    @chrishorner7679 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    That was an excellent interview. My thanks to all involved in it.

  • @juanormeno9072
    @juanormeno9072 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I agree with Chris. It was an excellent interview. Clever and illustrative. Congrats!

  • @henri.r94
    @henri.r94 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1:20:10 the basketball player reference is golden lol. We all remember the interview he did with "Chasing Leviathan" where he talked about Michael Jordan and the interviewer referenced his name to Scottie Pippin lol. And LOVE the question on the relation between sports and philosophy, which seems to be a question that recedes into the background since Ancient Greece. The only other references I can think of are Rousseau's Emile and some of Nietzsche's works.

    • @EyeByBrian
      @EyeByBrian 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You may find of interest Hans Gumbrecht’s _In Praise of Athletic Beauty_ (Harvard UP, 2006).

  • @vitoroliveirajorge368
    @vitoroliveirajorge368 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    a very interesting author, indeed. Interesting also the comments Slavoj Zizek about some of his thoughts. I also admire Agon Hamza and Frank Ruda

  • @FG-fc1yz
    @FG-fc1yz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pippin vs Zizek would be necessary and epic, make it happen pls!

  • @KristinP-zi2dj
    @KristinP-zi2dj 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    love is all that matters, really.

  • @FG-fc1yz
    @FG-fc1yz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    4:51 metaphysics = logic, i.e. being = pure thinking 7:51!; was Heidegger darunter versteht siehe 40:09 ab15:20! break between Heidegger and Hegel (und Tradition des Deutschen Idealismus), Hegel als der Philosoph des Verfügbaren, Heidegger setzt dem das Unverfügbare bzw. Verborgene entgegen, das sich nur von sich selbst lichtet
    ab 49:00 zur gap-ontology von Zizek: Triade der Positionen von Hegel, Zizek bzw. Schelling und Heidegger (Dasein überhaupt kein Ding, auch kein natürliches; damit Kategorienfehler danach zu fragen, wie Dasein in logischen Raum der Normen und Konventionen eintreten konnte), siehe dazu 51:48 so wie Primat Neues erlernte, lernte er Sprache zu benutzen und damit sich und seine Umwelt logisch zu begründen/zu rechtfertigen/zu legitimieren; es werden nicht-fragwürdige Fragen von Zizek gestellt und deshalb gap-ontology;
    55:25 was Zizek dazu sagen würde
    59:55 the concept as such (wenn es als Objekt im Denken erscheint)
    ab1:01:20 Diskussion: Kampf der frag-würdigen Fragen (über Natur der Natur)

  • @WackSmackAttack
    @WackSmackAttack ปีที่แล้ว +9

    to be fair to Hegel, he doesn't ultimately think there is "propositional" truth to be distinguished from other kinds of truths. philosophy for him is already non-propositional as exhibited in his dialectic of the subject and predicate close to the end of the Science of Logic

    • @letdaseinlive
      @letdaseinlive 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That would mean he didn't take his Logic to be true.

    • @WackSmackAttack
      @WackSmackAttack 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@letdaseinlive no, it just means that he interprets the Logic as neither propositional nor non-propositional. it only appears propositional

    • @letdaseinlive
      @letdaseinlive 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He thinks it says something true. If someone showed him a contraction in it he would admit it had a problem.

  • @robertalenrichter
    @robertalenrichter หลายเดือนก่อน

    Skill acquisition is a process of automation, but the pianist or the hockey player does organise the small portion which remains under conscious control. The question is, how much of it will always be conscious? Is there a built-in limit that prevents us from learning the wrong things without being able to go back and correct them? Everyday life prevents us from becoming robots because we're constantly navigating different situations, inputs, adaptive states of consciousness. But, within the confines of a particular activity, one might expect to eventually become robotic, yet this doesn't occur.

  • @thespiritofhegel3487
    @thespiritofhegel3487 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The owl of Minerva spreads her wings only at the onset of dusk so it is difficult just to say yet, but I believe Trump will be seen as a world-historical figure.

  • @dominiquenuit2181
    @dominiquenuit2181 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pippin is a brilliant writer, but rather blinkered in his discussion of the political situation in US and Europe.

  • @chhhhhris
    @chhhhhris ปีที่แล้ว

    1:02:56 charlie bit my finger!

  • @youkoshi
    @youkoshi 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    He keeps talking about “the western modernization project since the ancient Greeks” and I just don’t know what the F he is talking about. He knows there’s such a thing as the middle ages, right?

    • @jrrr5039
      @jrrr5039 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think he just misspoke and alluded to the continuity of a rationalist tendency culminating in late modernity.

    • @youkoshi
      @youkoshi 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jrrr5039 that doesn’t help or clarify anything since it’s precisely the existence of that continuity that I’m contesting

    • @jrrr5039
      @jrrr5039 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@youkoshi More precisely that the meaning of being has been implicitly assumed to reside in logical determinacy is Pippin and Heidegger's point, I think.