1:20:10 the basketball player reference is golden lol. We all remember the interview he did with "Chasing Leviathan" where he talked about Michael Jordan and the interviewer referenced his name to Scottie Pippin lol. And LOVE the question on the relation between sports and philosophy, which seems to be a question that recedes into the background since Ancient Greece. The only other references I can think of are Rousseau's Emile and some of Nietzsche's works.
4:51 metaphysics = logic, i.e. being = pure thinking 7:51!; was Heidegger darunter versteht siehe 40:09 ab15:20! break between Heidegger and Hegel (und Tradition des Deutschen Idealismus), Hegel als der Philosoph des Verfügbaren, Heidegger setzt dem das Unverfügbare bzw. Verborgene entgegen, das sich nur von sich selbst lichtet ab 49:00 zur gap-ontology von Zizek: Triade der Positionen von Hegel, Zizek bzw. Schelling und Heidegger (Dasein überhaupt kein Ding, auch kein natürliches; damit Kategorienfehler danach zu fragen, wie Dasein in logischen Raum der Normen und Konventionen eintreten konnte), siehe dazu 51:48 so wie Primat Neues erlernte, lernte er Sprache zu benutzen und damit sich und seine Umwelt logisch zu begründen/zu rechtfertigen/zu legitimieren; es werden nicht-fragwürdige Fragen von Zizek gestellt und deshalb gap-ontology; 55:25 was Zizek dazu sagen würde 59:55 the concept as such (wenn es als Objekt im Denken erscheint) ab1:01:20 Diskussion: Kampf der frag-würdigen Fragen (über Natur der Natur)
to be fair to Hegel, he doesn't ultimately think there is "propositional" truth to be distinguished from other kinds of truths. philosophy for him is already non-propositional as exhibited in his dialectic of the subject and predicate close to the end of the Science of Logic
Skill acquisition is a process of automation, but the pianist or the hockey player does organise the small portion which remains under conscious control. The question is, how much of it will always be conscious? Is there a built-in limit that prevents us from learning the wrong things without being able to go back and correct them? Everyday life prevents us from becoming robots because we're constantly navigating different situations, inputs, adaptive states of consciousness. But, within the confines of a particular activity, one might expect to eventually become robotic, yet this doesn't occur.
The owl of Minerva spreads her wings only at the onset of dusk so it is difficult just to say yet, but I believe Trump will be seen as a world-historical figure.
He keeps talking about “the western modernization project since the ancient Greeks” and I just don’t know what the F he is talking about. He knows there’s such a thing as the middle ages, right?
@@youkoshi More precisely that the meaning of being has been implicitly assumed to reside in logical determinacy is Pippin and Heidegger's point, I think.
Been looking forward to this one!
there we go
I had exactly the same question about the Barbie movie. Quite astonishing.
That was an excellent interview. My thanks to all involved in it.
I agree with Chris. It was an excellent interview. Clever and illustrative. Congrats!
1:20:10 the basketball player reference is golden lol. We all remember the interview he did with "Chasing Leviathan" where he talked about Michael Jordan and the interviewer referenced his name to Scottie Pippin lol. And LOVE the question on the relation between sports and philosophy, which seems to be a question that recedes into the background since Ancient Greece. The only other references I can think of are Rousseau's Emile and some of Nietzsche's works.
You may find of interest Hans Gumbrecht’s _In Praise of Athletic Beauty_ (Harvard UP, 2006).
a very interesting author, indeed. Interesting also the comments Slavoj Zizek about some of his thoughts. I also admire Agon Hamza and Frank Ruda
Pippin vs Zizek would be necessary and epic, make it happen pls!
love is all that matters, really.
4:51 metaphysics = logic, i.e. being = pure thinking 7:51!; was Heidegger darunter versteht siehe 40:09 ab15:20! break between Heidegger and Hegel (und Tradition des Deutschen Idealismus), Hegel als der Philosoph des Verfügbaren, Heidegger setzt dem das Unverfügbare bzw. Verborgene entgegen, das sich nur von sich selbst lichtet
ab 49:00 zur gap-ontology von Zizek: Triade der Positionen von Hegel, Zizek bzw. Schelling und Heidegger (Dasein überhaupt kein Ding, auch kein natürliches; damit Kategorienfehler danach zu fragen, wie Dasein in logischen Raum der Normen und Konventionen eintreten konnte), siehe dazu 51:48 so wie Primat Neues erlernte, lernte er Sprache zu benutzen und damit sich und seine Umwelt logisch zu begründen/zu rechtfertigen/zu legitimieren; es werden nicht-fragwürdige Fragen von Zizek gestellt und deshalb gap-ontology;
55:25 was Zizek dazu sagen würde
59:55 the concept as such (wenn es als Objekt im Denken erscheint)
ab1:01:20 Diskussion: Kampf der frag-würdigen Fragen (über Natur der Natur)
to be fair to Hegel, he doesn't ultimately think there is "propositional" truth to be distinguished from other kinds of truths. philosophy for him is already non-propositional as exhibited in his dialectic of the subject and predicate close to the end of the Science of Logic
That would mean he didn't take his Logic to be true.
@@letdaseinlive no, it just means that he interprets the Logic as neither propositional nor non-propositional. it only appears propositional
He thinks it says something true. If someone showed him a contraction in it he would admit it had a problem.
Skill acquisition is a process of automation, but the pianist or the hockey player does organise the small portion which remains under conscious control. The question is, how much of it will always be conscious? Is there a built-in limit that prevents us from learning the wrong things without being able to go back and correct them? Everyday life prevents us from becoming robots because we're constantly navigating different situations, inputs, adaptive states of consciousness. But, within the confines of a particular activity, one might expect to eventually become robotic, yet this doesn't occur.
The owl of Minerva spreads her wings only at the onset of dusk so it is difficult just to say yet, but I believe Trump will be seen as a world-historical figure.
Pippin is a brilliant writer, but rather blinkered in his discussion of the political situation in US and Europe.
1:02:56 charlie bit my finger!
He keeps talking about “the western modernization project since the ancient Greeks” and I just don’t know what the F he is talking about. He knows there’s such a thing as the middle ages, right?
I think he just misspoke and alluded to the continuity of a rationalist tendency culminating in late modernity.
@@jrrr5039 that doesn’t help or clarify anything since it’s precisely the existence of that continuity that I’m contesting
@@youkoshi More precisely that the meaning of being has been implicitly assumed to reside in logical determinacy is Pippin and Heidegger's point, I think.