THE FIRST EVER STAND ALONE TRADED SET! 1981 TOPPS TRADED!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 10

  • @bartwilliams381
    @bartwilliams381 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So many cards in that set i have never seen. I have the Raines, Staub , Fisk, Blyleven, & Winfield that is all....
    I need to add the Fred Lynn , Fernando , Ted Simmons, Sutter, Fingers , Perry, Morgan, Sutton , Bobby Bonds , KONG, Carney Lansford and Gary Matthews someday.
    1981 was 1st year i collected so love this set

  • @571951rhoehn1
    @571951rhoehn1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Been a while since I have seen this Thanks for sharing!!!

  • @frankanderson4113
    @frankanderson4113 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another beautiful issue. You share the coolest cards that were ever printed imo. 1980 - 1986. Yeah I'm biased. Thanks for another video full of knowledge and beautiful cards. I love your channel friend.

  • @allensansone6537
    @allensansone6537 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really like watching your videos your not loud your don't go thru the cards and you don't ever buy so much it is in the thousands of dollars category

  • @marklendhurst1193
    @marklendhurst1193 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very informative. I always wondered about the whole traded set card issue/rated rookie vs 1st stand alone in a regular set issue debate. Kinda like the whole USFL vs 1st appearance in an NFL set debate (I consider the USFL the 1st).

  • @chrismitchell3292
    @chrismitchell3292 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That was just weird seeing Gene Tenace in a Cardinals uni

  • @tombrooks3812
    @tombrooks3812 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I could see Topps being intimidated by Beckett,he was pretty much setting the card prices. It almost sounds like a case of blackmail or you scratch my back and ill scratch yours. There was a lot of money on the line! It wouldnt suprize me.

    • @JonsSportsCards
      @JonsSportsCards  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      One man should not have set the standard. Topps should have decided who was a rookie and who was not when it came to their own cards.