Origin of Life: Recycling and Repair (Long Story Short, Episode 13)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 มิ.ย. 2024
- We know that DNA contains information that is vital for life, but our DNA is constantly assaulted by chemical and physical processes, degrading its information content-threatening the ongoing existence of life. How do our cells prevent information degradation in our DNA? This video reviews the highly complex error-correction mechanisms in cells that help maintain the information in our DNA so life can survive. These complex mechanisms would be required for the first life to exist-posing yet another challenge to the chemical origin of life.
This is the eighth of several episodes about the origin of life presented as part of the Long Story Short series. If you enjoyed this one, you will like all the others. Clever, humorous, substantive, brief, “Long Story Short," is an occasional video series that compresses key points in the debate between Darwinism and intelligent design into a very welcome format: concise, accessible, and funny. • Long Story Short
============================
Are you interested in the origins of life and the universe? Get this free book and explore the debate between Darwinian evolution and intelligent design. If you're intrigued by the origins of life, this is a must-read. It might change the way you view our world.
As a special gift from the director of the CSC, Dr. Stephen Meyer, you can download his 32-page mini-book Scientific Evidence for a Creator for FREE: evolutionnews.org/_/sefac
The Discovery Science News Channel is the official TH-cam channel of Discovery Institute's Center for Science & Culture. The CSC is the institutional hub for scientists, educators, and inquiring minds who think that nature supplies compelling evidence of intelligent design. The CSC supports research, sponsors educational programs, defends free speech, and produce articles, books, and multimedia content. For more information visit:
www.discovery.org/id/
evolutionnews.org/
intelligentdesign.org/
Follow us:
X: / discoverycsc
Facebook: / discoverycsc
Instagram: / discoverycsc
TikTok: / discoverycsc
Visit other TH-cam channels connected to the Center for Science & Culture
Discovery Institute: / discoveryinstitute
Dr. Stephen C. Meyer: / drstephenmeyer - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
Praise to the ultimate master chemist and master physicist who designed the cell.
The idea that such astonishing sophistication and complexity came about through a long series of errors is so laughable that Darwinists ought to be ashamed of themselves. Great video.
Keep the Long Story Short videos coming!
This is simply a fantastic video pointing out the obvious science ignored by so many. Thank you so much for making this!
I have found when talking to people who are skeptical of ID, they have a very simplistic view of biology. One of the best arguments against evolution is just understanding what is actually going on in the cells.
Ok, but surely you agree there is much more to the creation story than what we are told in religious texts.
I am a scientist who has studied what is actually going on in cells for my entire adult life. To have non-scientists accuse me of having a "simplistic view of biology" is not an effective way of convincing me that supernatural beings exist.
@@A_Stereotypical_HereticOf course. God told us what we needed to know at the time, not everything there was to know about everything.
5:25 The most educating video with the world's funniest presentation. 🏆
I never cracked up so much while watching any kind of science related videos.
Love this series
Wish it was easier to share with others
It really opened my eyes which were once blinded by how amazing life actually is and all its mysteries.
Love the way you simplify complex systems, (and make it fun). Keep it coming.
These videos are MASSIVELY beneficial. Thank you!
I will never forget the very strong point of that poor guy, who tried to repair the machine while it was still running… 😂In the normal world: Simply impossible!
Some machines are built to be repairable in a running state. But it requires more planning when you construct the machine.
It's mind boggling how people that work in these fields can delude themselves to where they believe their own incredulous speculations of chemical reactions creating 100's if not 1000's of complex mechanisms simultaneously
together for very specified purposes ????
Do you only see what you’re willing to see?
I can grasp the concept of evolution by natural selection, it does make some amount of sense. What I can't accept is both abiogenesis and reducible complexity. Those two things just don't compute with me.
Brilliant video to communicate extremely complicated material.
Brilliant as always. I never miss one of these!
I love these little videos! Thank you so much!
Thank you for such a wonderful tutorial on the fearfully, wonderfully, miracle of creation.
The truth is… This issue is not an intellectual one. It’s a moral one. The issue is honesty. The honest answer is this is Gods work. The dishonest answer is something like “we are going to figure out how chance and accidents did this, just give us until the end of time to show you.”
Great video. Very informative and gives a lot to think about
Delightful!
My university students always get a kick out of these videos and they are so informative. Keep them coming.
Fantastic. Thank you so much.
Wonderful, thank you
Great Series!!
It is Obvious - Science Proclaims God! This is my favorite Long Story Short - As a Biologist and doctor that understands these complexities quite well, there is no question to me that there is a higher power - an Incredible (not just intelligent) Designer!
It is worth noting that scientists and journalists writing within the context of extraterrestrial life are acknowledging that science doesn't know how Abiogenesis could happen either on a sterile planet or in a laboratory. The most recent such confession is in a book published in 2023.
I don't think this guy is saying scientists are ignorant of all this, just that the conclusion is SO obvious that it's left to be wondered why they still cling to naturalism.
Thank you so much!
Love the line “this is all oversimplified baby talk of course- the actual mechanics of how these work is far more complex than what we can convey here”
If I’m not mistaken, militant atheistic scientists talk mostly baby talk, dressed up with long words.
We are fearfully and wonderfully made. Thanks for reminding us.
Very nice. I really like the series. It would be nice if you could review the series playlist and put it in correct viewing order.
Indeed. And I think there are a couple of earlier ones on another channel!
Keep up the good work discovery science
Excellent, informative and factual.
mind boggling
The obvious fact is that humans were created by a genius.
Great video, thanks.
Insane
This biochemist finds this to be humorous and engaging. And where did the repair enzymes come from?
Great work!
The evidence for design is overwhelming.
That’s why evos don’t want ID being taught. They know what would happened to their theory
How 'bout a "Long Story Medium"? I could go another twelve minutes. ;)
Perfect ❤
Hi!! First!! Love you guys!! God Bless!!
Just wonderful ❤ subhan Allah
This video reminds me of Dr. James Tour exploring the problems of Abiogenesis in his videos. As someone with a chemistry background, I can appreciate the insanity that Tour often points out... just how in the hell can the product of a random chemical reaction be verified as the correct product with only chemistry involved? (How can biology do this even?)
One of the most laborious tasks one can slog through in a chemistry lab setting is the step by step justification of the identity of the product you were trying for. The steps to create it might be minor laboratory practice, but the myriad possible outcomes... should your starting reagents have the wrong concentration, or you used the the wrong solvent, or your reaction temperatures are too high and it scorches or too low and the reaction never proceeds, or there is too much UV radiation in the room from the fluorescent lighting and it degrades your sample, or your pH is too low, or the precipitate never forms, or the whole thing literally blows up in your face because you heated it slightly too fast. The near-infinite potential for unwanted outcomes will ALWAYS outstrip the intended outcome. Random mutations do not invent anything, they just break what already exists in deleterious ways. It is only the elegant design already present which is capable of combatting this 'Genetic Entropy'.
I remain convinced that those who believe random mutations can invent new genetic information have never built anything in real life.
Thank you for demonstrating that you have no idea how Biology works.
@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 Thank you for demonstrating that you have the full understanding of Biology.
Why it ALMOST like there is a plan or something.
Please introduce a book on this topic. tnx
Finally. :)
Thank you for this fantastic video. I will incorporate it into our Christian Apologetics program at Salem Chapel, NC.
And yet they strive to find life on Mars, Europa, etc. because of the assumption that life can assemble itself given the correct conditions (which again, are assumed to be legion in the Universe).
I am waiting for your video
God is a logical necessity. Darin's hypothetical assumtions are a logical fallacy.
Nice. Could make this into la cool bumper sticker.
Is this a re-upload?
@DiscoveryScienceChannel NOOOOOOO! I thought this was a new video. I'm pretty sure I've seen this one. Why is it posted as new?
I think this was uploaded to the LSS channel a few weeks ago. Maybe you're subbed to both?
Folate is needed for a correct copy of your dna for cel division
Even with intelligent scientists working on a cell, its much to complex to assemble a cell and all of these nano machines. The more complex things get, the more difficult it becomes to think of these things coming about unguided becomes. In order to even make it look plausible the hypothesis would need a demonstration of not only how it could happen but how it could happen easily and without man made chemicals. The catch 22 is also that the very same molecules are under a time constraint. These things parcipitate and degrade but even then rna spoils very quickly and the very same things that create rna, also destroy rna.
Your argument is not convincing! Well... that is,it is not convincing to A CERTAIN GROUP. They ___for the most part ___will continue to dismiss anything that doesn't work for their persuasion. Such tenacity would be admirable if only it was supportive of a logical view.
This is a good topic to address. Well done. ♥
DNA only encodes information about how the cells produce protein.
There are already scientists who have seen the unreality and the limitations of the materialistic paradigm, and who have started to bring forth new observations and new theories. Including theories about the actual intelligence of the cell, and the fact that a human being is not exclusively the product of the DNA, but that the cell itself actually has a form of intelligence, that allows it to respond to the environment and allows it to respond to a greater state of consciousness that is beyond the DNA and what can be encoded in the DNA.
This is already there at the forefront of biology, but of course it has not been recognized by the mainstream of science. For again, you have people here who have been trapped into thinking that by promoting the materialistic paradigm, they are actually working for an ultimate cause, working for some ultimate truth. And they have refused to see, that they are simply being used in order to keep the people pacified through that materialistic paradigm.
Oh, please. Your religious beliefs do not define scientific inquiry.
This still never addresses how the cell gets there in the first place. it can only address evolution, after the cell exists. The next step for atheist scientists is to give intelligence to atoms themselves, a kind of Pantheism. They must give nature intelligence. Parsimony requires a Creator.
Please keeping
Lol Why do the librarians gotta be little old ladies?
Because it is fun.
the more that is learned the further away the answers get
Excellent work. Well done.
Oh man, these guys' desperation is hilarious.
Actually, these peope have no desperation, they have God's peace, which I wish that You have too
I see you in all these videos. Do you have any actual objections to the conclusion in this video?
Oh, the irony.
And ribosomes are made of proteins that it assembles? Coded by what before DNA & the tRNA, mRNA & rRNA? And dna and the rna's sugar components are are different. Deoxyribose and ribose and every molecule is it's right hand form.
👀
God is the reason for order. Randomness can't produce order.
Genesis 1:1
True science always leads to God the Creator.......
That’s why Newton had enormous faith.
The strongest science (higher probability explanation of the empirical data/observations) is within ID. The higher probability ID is within YeC - creation science.
In the ID vs NDT Neo-Darwinism disputed science and the Deeper-time dependent ID vs YeC compliant ID science disputes. Start study at Pearlman YeC on the alignment of Torah testimony, science and ancient civilization at ResearchGate, academia and amazon..
All this is is the Argument from Incredulity. Just because you don’t understand it doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. This whole series is not a debate, as you claim. It’s just bad reasoning.
Actually this îs good reasoning . But for someone who does not bother to listen and to think a little to what was said, who îs full of evolutionist prejudices, it is surely upsetting. This is bad thinking
If I said that I could jump 100 feet into the air with no assistance would you be incredulous? Would the mere absurdity of that claim be enough to suggest I had to have help? Yes. It’s the same here. Incredulity isn’t an argument, but probability is, and it can make incredulity valid. It’s not that these scientists “don’t understand” how it works, it that they do understand how it works and see the impossibility of such a thing happening by chemistry alone. Sorry, but just because you don’t understand the science, doesn’t make your credulity an argument.
I shall await your step-by-step instructions on the construction of enzymes, proteins, and a single cell from non-living matter through naturalistic processes and no help from a scientist. Wait, scratch that, show me this process even WITH the help of a scientist. I shall await your research.
Bit you of course, DO understand? Please, you are grasping at straws in an effort to evade your very own creaturehood, and enjoy zero standing to criticize others who are less close-minded!
Where, in any of this, did you get “we don’t understand it”? Im genuinely curious.
To push back directly, no, rather, this is all a claim that natural processes CANNOT account for these things AND that only an intelligent agent can account for it.
The burden is on the those who say natural processes ARE potent enough or have the means to account for these phenomena, to show it. Y’all can’t.
Good rubbish
❤️🔥Would you allow us to translate your video into our native language and post it on TH-cam? Please🥹