Hattie McDaniel was such a treasure!!! She did very well for herself! First black to ever receive an Oscar...simply amazing! I wish i had every movie she was ever in!!!
This was fabulous. I have always loved Henry B. Walthall, his quiet dignity, his beautifully sculpted countenance. He died just 2 years after this film was made. Love his voice -- he made his mark in silent films, but his gravitas and beautiful way of speaking of course helped him make the transition to talking films. Will Rogers -- he was no actor, but he had an interesting shtick and lots of charisma. You can't take your eyes off him. Hattie McDaniel was adorable as always; Stepin Fetchit was fascinating. I have read that he was a millionaire from being in films -- the first black actor to achieve that landmark.
That harmonica playing, especially around 21 minutes, was phenomenal. And it was really Stepin Fetchit playing it. Pretty good movie. A tribute to the confederacy doesn't play well today, but the movie itself is historical because it shows attitudes in the 1930's.
_Wow, my dearest Helen! This old movie from 89 years ago hás everything in it tô be a great one!,John Ford is the director and Will Rogers is the leading actor, While the great Hattie MacDaniels from Gone With the Wind is his supporting actress...as well as a superb plot!, It's for real an amazing movie!,I guess that you'll enjoy it very much on CCC movie chat at live!,God bless you always,, my dearest Helen!_ 🤩🤩🤗🤗
@@keithharvey7230 Hi, Keith Harvey! Thanks a lot for your kindness, giving to us this information, because a Simple "s" on the end sometimes can change all the origin from someone! You're right on it, correcting the credits mistake on the movie! Hattie McDaniel Thanks you a lot for this correction! God bless you always!
Gracias mis amigos he visto varias veces la película que tenía 12 años voy a cumplir 55 y siempre me hace reír ante la gente éramos sencilla y con una helada no habían cosas crudas y con la sencillez de las películas siempre los ríos Gracias desde Nicaragua
Here is a fun fact for you: Will Rogers appeared 71 films (50 silent films and 21 "talkies") Meanwhile Hattie McDaniel appeared in over 300 films, although she received screen credits for only about 80... and McDaniels played a maid at least 74 times over her career!
1st to wait, 1st to "Like," and 1st to look around the Triple-C theater for Helen. But she's not here! Let's look behind the curtain, might be hiding there! 🔦✔🏁😎
And I'm first to say to BBJ; Why I oughta &%*!?#. er I mean hello, how's it goin? how ya doin today? LOL You defintely sound completely recovered. LOL 👍 See ya soon, pal.
Tudo o que você precisa fazer é clicar no botão "CC" para ativar as "legendas fechadas"; em seguida, o botão Configurações ⚙ para selecionar seu idioma preferido!
It is Hattie McDaniel - not Hattie McDaniels (with an "S") I see that her name was mis-spelled in the opening movie credits, so it's understandable that you would pick up the error in your TH-cam title. Cheers to a wonderful actress who also had a lovely singing voice!
Olá administrador do canal! Em seu canal tinha um filme dos anos 50 ou 60 colorido que a primeira cena era um barco e que uma loura com vestido verde dançava ao redor de várias pessoas? Qual o nome do filme? Se eu não me engano o filme é da RKO Pictures
CCC are we turning "WOKE"? EVERYONE of your movies ALWAYS shows the lead actor (in this case it would have been Will Rogers, who I might add was a phenomenon at the time the movie was made), but you chose Hattie McDaniel, who is one actor from being dead last in the list of actors.
@@lisagerman2111 Wrong the record need not be changed to suit political correction. There is the star and there are supporting actors. She was not the star.
@Brad James We currently live in a time where everybody wants to rewrite history to be woke or politically correct at best. Thus, if you rewrite history then it is no longer history regardless of who's doing it.
@@qwer123211 Calm down. The comparison wasn't made in order to attempt to rewrite history. It was a comparison of careers and a reflection of what part race may have played in the recognizing of career accomplishments. It doesn't diminish or erase either McDaniel's or Roger's careers.
Think İ must have got it all wrong. İ thought the confederates were for black slavery and not for freedom AND THE REBELS WERE FOR THE ABOLİTİON OF SLAVERY, sorry about the capitals there. So the film makes no sense, still enjoyable, as a non historic.
No, the rebels were the Southern States, which rebelled against the Union's attempt to ride roughshod over their desire for greater independence. The slavery issue was not as clear-cut as North vs South. You should study the history of it. Very illuminating.
You do have it wrong, @kattydover6356, but if you aren't from the USA, it's probably understandable, as it gets complicated. The film is set in Kentucky, which technically remained neutral in the American Civil War, but Kentucky was the site of many Civil war battlefields, and Kentuckians fought on both sides of the war, with attitudes changing over the course of the war and the Reconstruction period to follow, and beyond. By the time the Confederacy (generally southern and western states/territories) seceded/rebelled from the Union, slavery had been all but completely abolished in the North, but still provided a backbone of labor for the Southern states' cotton plantation economy, and more importantly was tied up in Southern politics (slaves were being imported in large numbers for a time because they could be counted as citizens for the purpose of allotting political power to Southerners, which Northern politicians moved to void, resulting in the infamous 3/5 compromise, which settled between slaves counting as full citizens only for the purpose of political exploitation, and not counting them at all - thus counting them as 3/5 of a free citizen....) This would play into Western territories and how/when they could be admitted as states to the union: if they were admitted as slave states, they would likely side with Southerners politically, while otherwise territories without legal slavery might be aligned with northern abolitionists, heightening the friction between North and South. Northern Republicans under the Lincoln administration weren't necessarily opposed to slavery per se - the Republican Party has always been a fairly progressive party in spite of its modern conservative reputation, and was generally abolitionist, but the Lincoln administration and its staunchest supporters were not known before the war for being particularly anti-slavery. However, there was political advantage to be had over the southern Democrats in abolishing slavery, with the understanding that the freed slaves would likely support the Northerners who freed them, at the expense of southern wealth and power... this would also play into the northern strategy during the war, as an appeal to black slaves fighting with the south to defect and weaken or even fight the south militarily. Hence Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation.... The American Civil War was thus only indirectly fought over slavery, and was largely instead fought over political power, economics, and territory (as is the case of most wars), with slavery involved mostly for its secondary role as an institution of political power, economic wealth and strength, and territory in the border states and the western frontier. After the war, the former slaves now freed with all the privileges and rights of free white southerners represented a new voting block that threatened old southern Democratic power; among the responses from southern Democrats were "Jim Crow" laws that interfered with black voting (for example, by requiring a literacy test that former slaves that were forbidden to learn to read and write could not pass), and also an intimidation campaign to scare black voters away from election polling places, which would evolve into a full-blown organized terror campaign. Northern Republicans, meanwhile, had been flooding southern states under Reconstruction with pro-Republican migrant voters - "carpetbaggers" - who would also attempt to organize black voters to support a pro-northern Republican cause, setting the stage for post-Civil War racial violence in retaliation, and leading in time to the Civil Rights movement. It would have been during the years leading up to the Civil Rights era that the Democratic party began to recognize the political leverage that the black vote represented, and the Johnson administration in particular when the Democrats would start taking full advantage of that leverage by working with black voters instead of against them. It wasn't a universally popular change of strategy among white Democrats, and there was a split among the now pro-Civil Rights wing of the party's white voters - generally educated urban northerners and westerners, and those Democrats - generally southerners - who still harbored the remnants of Reconstruction-era grudges; some (but definitely not all) of whom would defect to the Republican party, contributing to the modern American political cliches about the two parties "trading places" with Democrats being an exclusively progressive "pro-Civil Rights" party, and the Republicans being exclusively a party of "conservative racists". The boundaries between the formerly progressive Republican northern/Union states, and the formerly anti-Civil Rights southern Democratic states has blurred over time as the two parties reinvented themselves, demographics in the various states changed, and so on - many former Democrat strongholds in the south have "swung red" instead in recent years in part as a response to the Republican party's new role as a home for non-college-educated working-class conservative Christian voters, as urban areas have largely "gone blue" as strongholds for college-educated urban white voters, and the black voters who had moved to the Democratic party during and after the Johnson-era reinvention of the Democratic party as a pro-Civil Rights and pro-social benefits party. Kentucky had largely abandoned its remaining pro-slavery position during the American Civil War as remaining slaveholders abandoned their slaves when joining the Confederate army or fleeing from Union advances, or freed their slaves as more trouble than they're worth to keep, or saw their slaves run away to join the Union army or otherwise escape to free states. Kentucky politically existed in a sort of denial for a time afterward: since it hadn't joined the Confederacy, it wasn't quite a target for emancipation as a political weapon against the South, and there was still some hope among remaining slaveholders that slavery would never go away in the state, while in practice the handwriting was on the wall, and slavery had pretty much disintegrated in the state as an institution, with the last of Kentucky's slaves being freed relatively peacefully in the 1860s, while abolition of slavery was not constitutionally ratified in the state until the 1970s - since it was effectively gone, there really wasn't much hurry to officially end it! Kentucky, where the movie is set, was generally neutral as a state, with factions who preferred complete neutrality, alongside factions of pro-slavery confederate sympathizers, and pro-Union and pro-Abolition supporters, and could have been a perfect illustration of the American Civil War cliche about brothers fighting brothers: the loyalties of many Kentucky families close to the southern border and throughout the state were divided over the war; perhaps Kentucky's neutrality might have made the state more willing than most former slave states to try to heal those differences after the war. In short, it's complicated, but southern secessionist/rebel Confederates would have generally been slave states during the Confederate and Civil War era and the years leading up to the war, while northern pro-Union states were generally at least ambivalent to slavery, if not indifferent to it, or even actively anti-slavery. Kentucky, the movie's setting, was officially neutral, and very often divided politically between the two sides of the war.
Hattie McDaniel was such a treasure!!! She did very well for herself! First black to ever receive an Oscar...simply amazing! I wish i had every movie she was ever in!!!
This was fabulous. I have always loved Henry B. Walthall, his quiet dignity, his beautifully sculpted countenance. He died just 2 years after this film was made. Love his voice -- he made his mark in silent films, but his gravitas and beautiful way of speaking of course helped him make the transition to talking films.
Will Rogers -- he was no actor, but he had an interesting shtick and lots of charisma. You can't take your eyes off him.
Hattie McDaniel was adorable as always; Stepin Fetchit was fascinating. I have read that he was a millionaire from being in films -- the first black actor to achieve that landmark.
That harmonica playing, especially around 21 minutes, was phenomenal. And it was really Stepin Fetchit playing it.
Pretty good movie. A tribute to the confederacy doesn't play well today, but the movie itself is historical because it shows attitudes in the 1930's.
Hollywood should never have sucked up to the confederacy. The United States gave those traitors too much respect for too long.
_Wow, my dearest Helen! This old movie from 89 years ago hás everything in it tô be a great one!,John Ford is the director and Will Rogers is the leading actor, While the great Hattie MacDaniels from Gone With the Wind is his supporting actress...as well as a superb plot!, It's for real an amazing movie!,I guess that you'll enjoy it very much on CCC movie chat at live!,God bless you always,, my dearest Helen!_ 🤩🤩🤗🤗
Hi paulo 😊
@@mikesilva3868 _Hi, Mike! Have a wonderful day.much blessed by God, pardner!_
Hattie McDaniel non Daniels.The movie credits got it wrong.
@@keithharvey7230 Hi, Keith Harvey! Thanks a lot for your kindness, giving to us this information, because a Simple "s" on the end sometimes can change all the origin from someone! You're right on it, correcting the credits mistake on the movie! Hattie McDaniel Thanks you a lot for this correction! God bless you always!
Gracias mis amigos he visto varias veces la película que tenía 12 años voy a cumplir 55 y siempre me hace reír ante la gente éramos sencilla y con una helada no habían cosas crudas y con la sencillez de las películas siempre los ríos Gracias desde Nicaragua
What a lovely movie. So enjoyable. Beginning to end.
Simply a classic!!! One of my favorites!!!❤❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉😂😮😅😊
Here is a fun fact for you: Will Rogers appeared 71 films (50 silent films and 21 "talkies")
Meanwhile Hattie McDaniel appeared in over 300 films, although she received screen credits for only about 80... and McDaniels played a maid at least 74 times over her career!
God Bless our dear Hattie McDaniel…such a wonderful actress. I imagine her as I always see her in Oviedo. Such a dear, sweet soft good women….✝️
To her credit, she won an Oscar. Even Will Rogers couldn't achieve that.
Will Rogers!!
You're putting up good oldies!! These would be on Saturday afternoon 😅
หนังเก่าก่อนผมเกิด เป็นหนังที่สนุกมาก คนสมัยก่อนแต่งและเดินเรื่องได้ดี ขอบคุณท่ี่นำมาลงให้ชมกัน
Have not seen this since I was a kid. Thanks for the showing.
Hattie the legend.
I am so happy today because I saw my dear Big John !He is waiting for me ! So I am sitting near him now 👸
Hi helen 🕺
@@mikesilva3868 hai mike 👸
Lol!
We all miss out pets.
True comedy thank you CULT---- classic you done it.
Îl aștept cu nerăbdare, este o bijuterie din care putem învața lecții pentru viață ,cu ani în urma lam vizionat,și-l recomand,un salut cu respect.
Thank you ❤ I knew there was some Antebellum period movies somewhere 🎉Thanks😊
I love this film made me think about a time when people cared for one another sure wish it was like that now
QUE bonita película 🎥🎞️🎬 GRACIAS GRACIAS 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏🎬👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
Emotivo y genial 😃 gracias por compartir tus películas 🎥 y éxitos en todos vuestros proyectos y planes😅excelente y tan antigua
❤❤❤❤ Está película me ayuda con mi 😢 Ansiedad ❤❤❤❤❤❤ Gracias gracias quién la Subió.... Un gran abrazo 🌹 para todos 🤗
Bellissimo film
Muchas gracias❤❤
Me encantan estas peliculas clasicas!!!!!
GRACIAS POR COMPARTIR.
1st to wait, 1st to "Like," and 1st to look around the Triple-C theater for Helen. But she's not here! Let's look behind the curtain, might be hiding there! 🔦✔🏁😎
Hahahahaha! Lovely comment ! I think so many young and beautiful ladies melted by ur words ! Yes !me too ! 👸 💋
And I'm first to say to BBJ; Why I oughta &%*!?#. er I mean hello, how's it goin? how ya doin today? LOL You defintely sound completely recovered. LOL 👍 See ya soon, pal.
@@helenpoornima5126 🤣agreed
@@zanti209 -- Actually, Zanti, I've got a long way to go, but my mental spirits are good.
For me: It all started with a suggested reading list. I wanted to see Antebellum period movies.....
Hattie McDaniel😍😍😍😍😍😍😍💓💞💞💞
Very good
Some of the closed captions are way off.
Posta filmes em português por favor.
Tudo o que você precisa fazer é clicar no botão "CC" para ativar as "legendas fechadas"; em seguida, o botão Configurações ⚙ para selecionar seu idioma preferido!
@@CultCinemaClassics Sim, eu conheço recurso, mas tenho dificuldade de leitura, por isso pedi filmes dublados.
It is Hattie McDaniel - not Hattie McDaniels (with an "S") I see that her name was mis-spelled in the opening movie credits, so it's understandable that you would pick up the error in your TH-cam title. Cheers to a wonderful actress who also had a lovely singing voice!
I noticed that as well.
I love the movie but the close caption is atrocious.
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Hey, what a coincidence; there are two guys named Bill Rebane! Y'know, cause you see, with the... and the - the guy that... this is gonna suck.🤣
Plonker.
🥰
Olá administrador do canal! Em seu canal tinha um filme dos anos 50 ou 60 colorido que a primeira cena era um barco e que uma loura com vestido verde dançava ao redor de várias pessoas? Qual o nome do filme? Se eu não me engano o filme é da RKO Pictures
He said: "I saved you a lynching."?
Hi
Hai dear 💋 👸
@@helenpoornima5126 💜
Tired of these 'coming soon' type videos. I never get a notice when they're finally up. So stop bothering me.
Woah! Seen him in my nightmares...🤣
Lol
Yikes, I couldn't get past the cringeworthy moment at 2:43 .... awful!
There's always one. Geoff was one of the great characters in this movie.
WHY? You ever seen a Lil Abner or Ma & Pa Kettle movie??
CCC are we turning "WOKE"? EVERYONE of your movies ALWAYS shows the lead actor (in this case it would have been Will Rogers, who I might add was a phenomenon at the time the movie was made), but you chose Hattie McDaniel, who is one actor from being dead last in the list of actors.
@qwer - chill, not everything is a trigger...peace :)
@@lisagerman2111 Wrong the record need not be changed to suit political correction. There is the star and there are supporting actors. She was not the star.
@Brad James We currently live in a time where everybody wants to rewrite history to be woke or politically correct at best. Thus, if you rewrite history then it is no longer history regardless of who's doing it.
@@qwer123211 Calm down. The comparison wasn't made in order to attempt to rewrite history. It was a comparison of careers and a reflection of what part race may have played in the recognizing of career accomplishments. It doesn't diminish or erase either McDaniel's or Roger's careers.
@@RealGRRRLz69 No, it was political correctness pure and simple. "Woke" up.
Think İ must have got it all wrong. İ thought the confederates were for black slavery and not for freedom AND THE REBELS WERE FOR THE ABOLİTİON OF SLAVERY, sorry about the capitals there. So the film makes no sense, still enjoyable, as a non historic.
No, the rebels were the Southern States, which rebelled against the Union's attempt to ride roughshod over their desire for greater independence. The slavery issue was not as clear-cut as North vs South. You should study the history of it. Very illuminating.
You do have it wrong, @kattydover6356, but if you aren't from the USA, it's probably understandable, as it gets complicated.
The film is set in Kentucky, which technically remained neutral in the American Civil War, but Kentucky was the site of many Civil war battlefields, and Kentuckians fought on both sides of the war, with attitudes changing over the course of the war and the Reconstruction period to follow, and beyond.
By the time the Confederacy (generally southern and western states/territories) seceded/rebelled from the Union, slavery had been all but completely abolished in the North, but still provided a backbone of labor for the Southern states' cotton plantation economy, and more importantly was tied up in Southern politics (slaves were being imported in large numbers for a time because they could be counted as citizens for the purpose of allotting political power to Southerners, which Northern politicians moved to void, resulting in the infamous 3/5 compromise, which settled between slaves counting as full citizens only for the purpose of political exploitation, and not counting them at all - thus counting them as 3/5 of a free citizen....) This would play into Western territories and how/when they could be admitted as states to the union: if they were admitted as slave states, they would likely side with Southerners politically, while otherwise territories without legal slavery might be aligned with northern abolitionists, heightening the friction between North and South.
Northern Republicans under the Lincoln administration weren't necessarily opposed to slavery per se - the Republican Party has always been a fairly progressive party in spite of its modern conservative reputation, and was generally abolitionist, but the Lincoln administration and its staunchest supporters were not known before the war for being particularly anti-slavery. However, there was political advantage to be had over the southern Democrats in abolishing slavery, with the understanding that the freed slaves would likely support the Northerners who freed them, at the expense of southern wealth and power... this would also play into the northern strategy during the war, as an appeal to black slaves fighting with the south to defect and weaken or even fight the south militarily. Hence Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation....
The American Civil War was thus only indirectly fought over slavery, and was largely instead fought over political power, economics, and territory (as is the case of most wars), with slavery involved mostly for its secondary role as an institution of political power, economic wealth and strength, and territory in the border states and the western frontier.
After the war, the former slaves now freed with all the privileges and rights of free white southerners represented a new voting block that threatened old southern Democratic power; among the responses from southern Democrats were "Jim Crow" laws that interfered with black voting (for example, by requiring a literacy test that former slaves that were forbidden to learn to read and write could not pass), and also an intimidation campaign to scare black voters away from election polling places, which would evolve into a full-blown organized terror campaign. Northern Republicans, meanwhile, had been flooding southern states under Reconstruction with pro-Republican migrant voters - "carpetbaggers" - who would also attempt to organize black voters to support a pro-northern Republican cause, setting the stage for post-Civil War racial violence in retaliation, and leading in time to the Civil Rights movement.
It would have been during the years leading up to the Civil Rights era that the Democratic party began to recognize the political leverage that the black vote represented, and the Johnson administration in particular when the Democrats would start taking full advantage of that leverage by working with black voters instead of against them. It wasn't a universally popular change of strategy among white Democrats, and there was a split among the now pro-Civil Rights wing of the party's white voters - generally educated urban northerners and westerners, and those Democrats - generally southerners - who still harbored the remnants of Reconstruction-era grudges; some (but definitely not all) of whom would defect to the Republican party, contributing to the modern American political cliches about the two parties "trading places" with Democrats being an exclusively progressive "pro-Civil Rights" party, and the Republicans being exclusively a party of "conservative racists". The boundaries between the formerly progressive Republican northern/Union states, and the formerly anti-Civil Rights southern Democratic states has blurred over time as the two parties reinvented themselves, demographics in the various states changed, and so on - many former Democrat strongholds in the south have "swung red" instead in recent years in part as a response to the Republican party's new role as a home for non-college-educated working-class conservative Christian voters, as urban areas have largely "gone blue" as strongholds for college-educated urban white voters, and the black voters who had moved to the Democratic party during and after the Johnson-era reinvention of the Democratic party as a pro-Civil Rights and pro-social benefits party.
Kentucky had largely abandoned its remaining pro-slavery position during the American Civil War as remaining slaveholders abandoned their slaves when joining the Confederate army or fleeing from Union advances, or freed their slaves as more trouble than they're worth to keep, or saw their slaves run away to join the Union army or otherwise escape to free states. Kentucky politically existed in a sort of denial for a time afterward: since it hadn't joined the Confederacy, it wasn't quite a target for emancipation as a political weapon against the South, and there was still some hope among remaining slaveholders that slavery would never go away in the state, while in practice the handwriting was on the wall, and slavery had pretty much disintegrated in the state as an institution, with the last of Kentucky's slaves being freed relatively peacefully in the 1860s, while abolition of slavery was not constitutionally ratified in the state until the 1970s - since it was effectively gone, there really wasn't much hurry to officially end it!
Kentucky, where the movie is set, was generally neutral as a state, with factions who preferred complete neutrality, alongside factions of pro-slavery confederate sympathizers, and pro-Union and pro-Abolition supporters, and could have been a perfect illustration of the American Civil War cliche about brothers fighting brothers: the loyalties of many Kentucky families close to the southern border and throughout the state were divided over the war; perhaps Kentucky's neutrality might have made the state more willing than most former slave states to try to heal those differences after the war.
In short, it's complicated, but southern secessionist/rebel Confederates would have generally been slave states during the Confederate and Civil War era and the years leading up to the war, while northern pro-Union states were generally at least ambivalent to slavery, if not indifferent to it, or even actively anti-slavery. Kentucky, the movie's setting, was officially neutral, and very often divided politically between the two sides of the war.
Thank you so much for the time and effort you have put into this reply, İ really appreciate this.@@pietrayday9915
@@pietrayday9915gracias por compartir.interrsante información.
150 years ago: Democrat Proud of Being Wrong Parade