Arduino Portenta Machine Control: The Simplest Way to Add a Powerful Brain to Your Machines
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 พ.ค. 2021
- The Portenta Machine Control is a fully-centralized, low power, industrial control unit able to drive equipment and machinery. It can be programmed using the Arduino framework or other embedded development platforms.
The Portenta Machine Control adds Industrial IoT capabilities to standalone industrial machinery. It enables the collection of real-time data from the factory floor and supports the remote control of equipment, even from the cloud, when desired.
Thanks to its computing power, the Portenta Machine Control enables a wide range of predictive maintenance and AI use cases.
Take a look: www.arduino.cc/pro/hardware/p... - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
![ArduinoPRO Portenta Machine Control [Unboxing and Initial Impressions]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/gfPw3b-Gbbo/mqdefault.jpg)
![ArduinoPRO Portenta Machine Control [Unboxing and Initial Impressions]](/img/tr.png)
![ไม่ต้องมีที่ที่ให้ฉันอยู่ แต่ขอแค่มีฉันอยู่ก็พอ (Spaceless) - getsunova [OFFICIAL MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4N8idbxZ-7M/mqdefault.jpg)
We just purchased one to review on our Channel!!! Walker Reynolds has called this Arduino Portena Machine Control (PMC) a Game Changer!
You talk a lot about all the PINS & connections & features, but it would be cool if you mentioned the SOFTWARE with which it is possible to connect to it and use it. Thank you
Maybe in future it will replace PLC completely 👍👍👍
This could be used in one of our products, a parallel port packed BCD interface connected to an Allen Bradley PLC
Finally got it 🙂
Is it possible to integrate this device with BACnet or KNX ecosystem Or can it be used as standalone system for Building automation?
This could have been a perfect product if it were not for the input... I would have prefer having all standard 4-20, 0-10, 10k input instead of thermocouple... thermocouple transmitter are easy to find and you have more option with standard signal inputs...
How to extend more IO for complex application?
Eccellenza Italiana!
PLCs in general have opto-isolator inputs, transorbs, MOV's, etc.
They need to be electrically rugged to deal with conditions that may be on a factory floor.
Does this board have any protection like that?
I think so
I don't think so... Seems like there are some I/O treatments, but everything is galvanically connected to the same ground. docs.arduino.cc/static/21ab6965d13d08daccc6096fe82ac28e/AKX00032-datasheet.pdf
I think is more oriented to IoT industrial ....
Documentation on this device is super scarce, I'm really hoping more tutorials come out soon or else I will feel I wasted $300 on this!
all great!, but what about a SCADA package for it, Otherwise it's just another "Blind" controller, maybe look at something that Codesys can offer with a web-based SCADA...
It's an interesting little unit especially at that price point but I wouldn't attempt implementing it in the field if I have to use Arduino IDE. Diagnosing a piece of malfunctioning equipment while watching serial monitor for your variables is not fun. Also spring terminals tend to get wonky after a year or two in humid environment from my experience
Yeah, I can't believe the Arduino IDE is still so... well, bad after so many years. I wish they'd make an "Arduino 2.0" SDK that breaks compatibility but completely reworks both the Arduino Core library and the IDE.
Huge issues right now are:
- No debugger integration
- Ridiculously slow compilation
- Costly abstractions, such as calculating pin mappings at runtime
- Lack of generalization. For example, a lot of SPI-based libraries will use the default "SPI" object, thus making them useless for devices with more than one SPI peripheral. This can partially be fixed at the level of individual third-party libraries but I see it as partly a guideline and tooling problem.
@@antonliakhovitch8306 I don't even call it an IDE... Worst editor ever made... I like the "hit to run", but moving forward maybe to Eclipse would be far better. Arduino IDE is good for rapid start for novices, but for advanced and larger projects than a single file it's a screaming agony...
@@riskototh A lot of people have issues with eclipse, for the opposite reasons (it's big and bloated and ugly). I think the real solution is an IDE-agnostic SDK: a set of commandline utilities that people can then use to make IDE plugins. This already sorta exists in the form of Platform IO, but it could be better.
Also- "click to run" is standard in microcontroller development. It actually works a lot better with official SDKs, because you also get "click to debug".
Who manufactured the application examples at 2:13. I work in the food industry and am interested in arduino/RaspberryPi based solutions replacing traditional PLCs.
Awesome
Is there any real technical information on this? I bought one, but all I find is marketing stuff and links to the Portena module. No pin mapping to be found anywhere. BTW is thing UL or ORD Loc certified?
As per datasheet, sadly no. Only RoHS and REACH certified
True
So ... this is a 120volt arduino? I just use a homebrew relay shield and a few relays, for stuff that dosnt need tons of outputs, and low voltage inputs (eg. sensors)
No. It uses 24V. 24V is the common control voltage in industrial applications. If you want to control 120V AC/DC you still need to control a relay.
This is not a cooking machine... and those watching this video will for sure understand a more technical language... Can you please map the functions to the other arduino boards ? E.g. Interrrupts, IO quantity... etc..
👍
This man looks like
Chester V from Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs
Anyone knows if there are libraries for codesys?
In the Arduino software. Arduino IDE
The problem is the CODES , i have many project but i can't because the code is not simple
The code just looks hard. Start with downloading the arduino software, and look at the library. Start with simpel stuff, and you will see its not that hard.
PLC ready ? 😁
wowww
where can i buy it?
Here you go: www.arduino.cc/pro/hardware/product/portenta-machine-control
had high hopes but ended up super disappointed with ours. to start. thermo coupler 0 was dead out the box and tech supports best guess was oh you have old firmware which was not the case. no offer to repair or replace. we absolutely could not get the modbus talking to anything via serial or eth and tech support again said sorry we have zero support tutorials, help, employees not on vacation willing to talking to you, and or working code we can send you. wasted 3 weeks of my life trying to get this thing working and ended up going with a kinco plc and hmi which was basically bullet proof at 1/3rd the cost. shame on you guys and your support, ive had nothing but praise for the uno, mega, leo, etc. pretty much done with arduino after this experience and cant wait to return this paperweight
This seems ill suited for industrial applications. It’s not 24V. Almost all industrial hardware is 24V. You’d have to run extra sensors that the machine probably already has. Even providing power to this thing with industrial hardware would be a challenge. Without supporting any industrial ethernet protocols like Profinet, EtherNet/IP, or even the relatively simple Modbus TCP protocol, the chances of integrating this with actual industrial equipment are nearly zero. The only real connectivity option I see here is Modbus RTU with the RS485 port, but I’m not sure if libraries are provided for even that. There’s more to industrial hardware than DIN rails and spring terminals.
Well the specs clearly show that it is full of 24VDC...
@@leeyang2320 not sure what spec sheet I was looking at before. That does help quite a bit. I’m still confused about what this is even for without industrial Ethernet support. Would it act as the primary controller? It’s a Linux computer, not a microcontroller, so that wouldn’t be ideal. If it’s just some kind of data collection and reporting system (industry 4.0) then how would it interface with a PLC?
Recently I wrote the code and commissioned a mine winder, effectively a lift to move miners and their vehicle 700m underground. It used Siemens S7 and a seperate safety controller. There were two VFDs driving two coupled asynchronous motors and massive disc breaks. If the controller did not function the 20 or so men on board would plummet to their deaths, or possibly not stop and slowly descend into to water at the bottom of the shaft and be drowned. I would never use an Arduino in such a plant.
It is not designed to be a fail safe or SIL rated controller. Having said that, I am not sure what market they are going for.
I hope you implemented fail safe devices operating independently of the plc
we are using adruino to remotely control large pumps which are not accessible due to flood & other reasons. It shows pressure,we can on off & trip indication@@primi22
Arduino for industry... Coincidence? I Dont think so.😅
is it again same what we allreadt have but packed someone else lol. yes it is. 30 buck i buy one but not 100 lol. wait lol 280. 100 was limit allready
Let's simplify an Arduino Controller that would work much better.... 8 Analog Inputs, 8 Analog Outputs, 8 Digital Inputs, 8 Digital Outputs, Add LAN, USB, WiFi connectivity with Serial all working on 9 - 12 volts you might have a winner. How much is this ****? €279,92 EUR ~ $310 USD "The simplest way to add a powerful brain to your machines"??? Might be good for specific industrial applications but if you only need 2 lines of control this would be too much... I'm more used to the Arduino Uno stuff for hobby
Underdeveloped. No clear labeling of pins. Massive library that takes 20 minutes to load. PWM is impossible. Bad product.
Buy a stackable ladder logic based PLC.
Wasted $300.
too costly !!
Buzzword Bingo
Maybe in future it will replace PLC completely 👍👍👍
👍