He is Mr. Anant Agarwal President of edX and Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at MIT. His research focus is in parallel computer architectures and cloud software systems, and he is a founder of several successful startups, including Tilera, a company that produces scalable multicore processors. Prof. Agarwal won MIT’s Smullin and Jamieson prizes for teaching and co-authored the course textbook “Foundations of Analog and Digital Electronic Circuits.”
That this extraordinarily high quality presentation is freely available to all is truly a blessing. That most Americans would choose to sip beer while watching Family Guy is truly tragic.
+sanjursan Circuit analysis has only been around a few generations. Put that against thousands of generations of motivation to "work during the day then sit with the tribe and enjoy yourself." Not really tragic, just the result of taking ancient humans and giving them novel technology. Really the weird people are the ones spending their free time learning things like this. The opposite of tragedy is the idea that very few people working at an exceptional level are able to create and maintain a society that makes a comfortable life for billions of others.
aluisious: Excellent response; thank you for taking the time to add to this thread. I can only add that if society chooses to remain ignorant of the details of what technology it consumes then at some point we may end up with political leaders who are just as ignorant as well. Cheers.
Wonderful professor, he broke the process down into abstract layers right off. Then goes straight to practical, hands on experience. Makes you want to seat down and draw out the smallest circuit then get your very own electron beam microscope and build it one atom at a time.
I studied in Mexico, but sometimes I hadn't understood some methods from US books. I can notice in Mexico we don't use abstraction methods, we always try the hard method, now i think it's stupid. I really liked it, thanks for share this classes. Good professor
He is so much better than my teacher. Classes have been going for a month now, we've already had our first test and we've only just gotten to the point he reached in the middle of his second lecture. My only complaint is that I still don't really understand exactly what's going on in the node method, which will make using/remembering it hard. But I'm hoping that I'll understand it better after I look at the lecture notes.
Students must be well trained to follow this class at this speed. He is good to separate concerns, and isolate different methods, what is good, though do not complete exercises, leaving them to the student since the first exposure to content. All in all, it was a good class, managed to explain, in 50 minutes, concepts that some teachers would take a whole semester to cover. That's MIT!
THank you sooo much MIT i am an EE major Jr year a unc. Just found these vids. OUTSTANDING thx. GREAT teachers.... they really make the difference. THANK U
Stumbled onto this as a HAM radio operator trying to learn the science of radio circuits and electromagnetic (radio) wave performance. Made it to this 2nd video. Follow the electrical terminology fine, but Professor lost me on the math at the end. Appears linear algebra proficiency is required to progress (and who knows what else) ... and my advanced math was 30 years ago, long forgotten. So good to know to stop my efforts to gain proficiency in radio science.
Tom W5VLT Hi Tom. The technique that the professor suggests using (Gaussian elimination) is usually the first topic covered in a linear algebra course. It’s pretty simple, so I’d encourage you not to give up! A little googling and you’ll be back on track in no time.
mr. blank that's one of the downsides of watching videos of this caliber. You have every right to be upset, but at least you have some foundational knowledge. If you ever wanted to go this deep, you could.
@eddiea6987 What do you mean by a voltage at each point? A voltage is taken as a difference in circuit potential between two points on a circuit; voltage is purely a relative quantity.
"How could more people have heard about Gaussian Elimination than took a Linear Algebra course?" I learned about Gaussian Elimination in high school algebra II, but didn't get into Linear Algebra until my junior year in college. I'm guessing so did they. :)
Instead of watching tv shows, i am watching the courses that i wont study in my undergrad curriculum for fun. They are exciting as any scenario, actually even better because they enable me to write my own life scenario. Don't think they are tiring much and they are broadening my understanding in a way. As a physics undergrad, i will have some introduction to electronics but still i think understanding thought process of engineering branches and other sciences does only good to me. Free,easy,fun.
How did we gather that the resistance of the two resistors in parallel is equal to (R2+R3)/(R2R3) at 31:44? He said that conductance is equal to the reciprocal of resistance. Wouldn't that mean that (G1 + G2 = (1/R2)+ (1/R3)) not (G1+G2 = (R2R3) / (R2+R3))? Thanks
@davestoj i mean if i have a power supply of 12v , then further down the circuit a voltage regulator outputting 5 volts and further down an even lower regulator giving me 3.3 volts , and if i did not know the part number of the regulators and needed to find out how much voltage is going through a certain point/part of a circuit couldnt i just stick a multimeter to the regulators common grnd and output pin and thus get how much voltage is going through that part of the circuit
at 31:46, he's combining the conductances r2 and r3. Why is his sum (r2*r3)/(r2+r3) and not (r2+r3)/(r2*r3)? Was that a typo or am I missing something?
Kirchoffs laws make more sense from a logical standpoint i.e. sum of all voltage drops equal supply and currents entering a node is equal to currents leaving. That makes total sense. This lump element stuff just convolutes everything.
@stucak88 - no they aren't, because they make much more noise, are harder to clean and to write on. The last two are supported by your large coefficient of friction argument. Thanks for that one xD
im getting more than three independent equations( see 22:48), am i doing something wrong? a: i0+i1+i4 = 0 b: i2+i3-i1 = 0 c: -i2-i5-i0 = 0 d: -i3+i5-i4 = 0
Not sure if you are kidding or meant it as a joke but you don't have a legitamite loop going through i3, i5, i4. i3, i5, and i2 are legitamite. And i3, i4 and i1 are legitamite. But i3, i5 and i4 don't even loop at all.
To be honest, i'm not sure it matters. I know for certain I learned that it's positive into the node and negative leaving. But as long as it ends as 0...it really don't matter.
Please SOMEBODY help me. I can't get currents' directions in KCL and NODE method. I think there is mistake in taking current directions. You know I was studied that everything should be very strict. How can 3 currents all be positive! io + i1 + i4 = 0. Ok we have other equations and can get that i0 (or i1, i4) is negative finally. BUT, if we make similar misassumption in other equations - everything can go wrong. And we have voltage source since when current is going inside source, it should go from positive to negative. if we have voltage consuming device, I could understand that, but not with voltage source. Also similar is true for (e1-Vo)G1+(e1-e2)G3+(e1)G2=0. All current is going inside/outside node? We have only 2 equation with all signs positive. How it can be? Currents just travels where they want? He is very flexible. But for someone who only starts electronics without having experience in KCL calculations, it can hurt understanding from the very beginning
Ahaha you and the MIT professor are over complicating things way too much. Kirchoff's Current basically says that the current throughout a series circuit is always the same. So in basic series circuits all current drops are the same no matter the resistor or load. Kirchoff's Voltage says that the voltage source is equal to the sum of the voltage drops in a series circuit. So Vs (Voltage Source) = V1 + V2 + V3... Basically that's all you really need to know starting off, anymore will make your head hurt if you don't know too much about circuiting. Honestly I learned all of this at a Community College and I find it much easier to learn it there then at MIT. Even though in the end you learn the same exact things, it's just that you have much smaller classes and more personal one on one time with your professor. That and this guy's handwriting, accent, and method of "simplifying" things are really confusing. He's a good teacher for MIT students I'm assuming, I can't see him as a good teacher for people who are looking for simple explanations of how circuiting works and basic introductions. However I personally know there are better teachers out there that can explain the same things in a much more simplistic and easier way, but I don't think that's what he's trying to go for.
jebril Well, you are actually agreeing with TheTimurbest. That is, in your analysis, rearranging your equation becomes 0 = -Vs + V1 + V2 + ... So, keeping track of the signs properly is important. And, the Prof does have an error, it appears to me.
The prof was right i think, I got confused regarding the polarity too after the lecture and followed the tutorial below, www.electronics-tutorials.ws/dccircuits/dcp_4.html Polarity of the current should be relative to the direction of the current from the node. (either the arrow coming in or going out of the node) Let say you make Current going out of node=positive Current coming into node=negative so the equation at 43:44 . (e2-Vo)G4+(e2-e1)G3+(e2)G5+(-I1)=0 (positive)G4+(positive)G3+(postive)G5+(negative)=0
Maybe for simple circuits, but when you have a very complicated circuit/module, it could become very complex. This is laying the foundation to understand complex circuit designs, or designing a circuit that does not yet exist.
09.31 - The final result would have been even more impressive if he had said "-1.63" rather than "-1.6"; this was the main source of "experimental error" for why the first loop did not quite sum to zero.
@eddiea6987 Indeed you could. Through the point of this analysis is to determine unknown voltages and currents without having to physically measure them. For something like voltage regulators, it's just easiest to physically measure their voltages.
It is the first lecture in the semester, so it tends to be an easy introduction, which sometimes gives students the false impression that the subject will be easy. Normal lectures are 50 minutes. Most universities have 50 minute lectures.
I clearly have no academic background in EE this is coming from my very new hobbyist perspective , try not to chastise me so much sir. but constructive criticism and corrections are very welcomed
+Matthew Ferrie because the total 1/resistance in parallel circuit IS 1/r1 + 1/r2 so 1/R total = r1+r2 / r1*r2 == SO R total in parallel circuit is (R1*R2)/(R1+R2)
this educational theory seems to follow the star trek (picard) theory where as people take high standards of education for the betterment of mankind not for money or selfish reasons, in a world where currency has been done away with.
He is Mr. Anant Agarwal
President of edX and Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at MIT. His research focus is in parallel computer architectures and cloud software systems, and he is a founder of several successful startups, including Tilera, a company that produces scalable multicore processors. Prof. Agarwal won MIT’s Smullin and Jamieson prizes for teaching and co-authored the course textbook “Foundations of Analog and Digital Electronic Circuits.”
th-cam.com/video/Y9sNFx7enFQ/w-d-xo.html
Mr Anant has been awarded Padma Shri.
This guy needs to be preserved at all costs.
My right ear has learned so much thank you
one click solution for windows 10 users baby. :D
@@sarthakchaudhary8027 You're not gonna get views spamming like this.
@@monotrope sorry, I was not aware it is a view spamming when I uploaded my video. but thankyou for reminding me..I will delete my link.
@@sarthakchaudhary8027 The link's still there? Didn't keep the promise
😂😂
In less than 2 hours I learned MORE than in 3 YEARS! amazing! thank you ! :)
MIT gots really amazing teachers no doubt....
th-cam.com/video/Y9sNFx7enFQ/w-d-xo.html
Same
That is very worrying
😂😂😂 thats on you bro stupid asl
Now I think my classes were so slower than this xd
I went to UC Irvine, and classes taught on this level would have changed my life. Thanks for MIT, also Stanford for their classes
To The person posting those videos. Thank you. sharing knowledge is one of the most noble acts of humanity. thank you for your noble act.
BEST TEACHER EVER tells you when its ok to fall asleep
atomicaveman Ehhhh wrong, try again. It's never all right to fall asleep in class. Trick question.
AGREED 😂👍
That this extraordinarily high quality presentation is freely available to all is truly a blessing. That most Americans would choose to sip beer while watching Family Guy is truly tragic.
+sanjursan Circuit analysis has only been around a few generations. Put that against thousands of generations of motivation to "work during the day then sit with the tribe and enjoy yourself." Not really tragic, just the result of taking ancient humans and giving them novel technology. Really the weird people are the ones spending their free time learning things like this.
The opposite of tragedy is the idea that very few people working at an exceptional level are able to create and maintain a society that makes a comfortable life for billions of others.
aluisious: Excellent response; thank you for taking the time to add to this thread. I can only add that if society chooses to remain ignorant of the details of what technology it consumes then at some point we may end up with political leaders who are just as ignorant as well. Cheers.
Did someone say Family Guy, I love that show!
sanjursan m
keep in mind 95% of people are midwits they simply do whats fun and enjoyable in the moment.
Wonderful professor, he broke the process down into abstract layers right off. Then goes straight to practical, hands on experience. Makes you want to seat down and draw out the smallest circuit then get your very own electron beam microscope and build it one atom at a time.
This professor is so great!!! He explains this so well! I wish we had this in High school!
This is the best lecturer of electronic /electrical engineering subjects Ive ever seen. Thank you for making your lectures available Professor Agarwal
in WIndows, System>Sound> Check "Mono Audio" while listening to this to get audio in both ears/speakers
thanks bro or femboy idk just thank u
I took the MITx course with this guy online. it was awesome
Now I know why MIT kicks ass. Their professors kick ass and the lectures are so organized and easy to understand
I studied in Mexico, but sometimes I hadn't understood some methods from US books. I can notice in Mexico we don't use abstraction methods, we always try the hard method, now i think it's stupid.
I really liked it, thanks for share this classes. Good professor
He is so much better than my teacher. Classes have been going for a month now, we've already had our first test and we've only just gotten to the point he reached in the middle of his second lecture.
My only complaint is that I still don't really understand exactly what's going on in the node method, which will make using/remembering it hard. But I'm hoping that I'll understand it better after I look at the lecture notes.
Students must be well trained to follow this class at this speed.
He is good to separate concerns, and isolate different methods, what is good, though do not complete exercises, leaving them to the student since the first exposure to content.
All in all, it was a good class, managed to explain, in 50 minutes, concepts that some teachers would take a whole semester to cover. That's MIT!
THank you sooo much MIT i am an EE major Jr year a unc. Just found these vids. OUTSTANDING thx. GREAT teachers.... they really make the difference. THANK U
Stumbled onto this as a HAM radio operator trying to learn the science of radio circuits and electromagnetic (radio) wave performance. Made it to this 2nd video. Follow the electrical terminology fine, but Professor lost me on the math at the end. Appears linear algebra proficiency is required to progress (and who knows what else) ... and my advanced math was 30 years ago, long forgotten. So good to know to stop my efforts to gain proficiency in radio science.
Tom W5VLT Hi Tom. The technique that the professor suggests using (Gaussian elimination) is usually the first topic covered in a linear algebra course. It’s pretty simple, so I’d encourage you not to give up! A little googling and you’ll be back on track in no time.
Circuits classes typically require a calculus based physics covering electricity and magnetism and differential equations as a co-requisite.
Watching these videos piss me off because I see that MIT lectures are taught more carefully and more thoroughly than I ever had in college.
mr. blank that's one of the downsides of watching videos of this caliber. You have every right to be upset, but at least you have some foundational knowledge. If you ever wanted to go this deep, you could.
Great teaching method and kudos to the camera person!
The Best Lecture I Never Had Part 2
It is measured in mhos too. mhos and siemens are the same unit. Read the Nilsson book.
Thanks for these lectures!!!
@eddiea6987 What do you mean by a voltage at each point? A voltage is taken as a difference in circuit potential between two points on a circuit; voltage is purely a relative quantity.
"How could more people have heard about Gaussian Elimination than took a Linear Algebra course?"
I learned about Gaussian Elimination in high school algebra II, but didn't get into Linear Algebra until my junior year in college. I'm guessing so did they. :)
Instead of watching tv shows, i am watching the courses that i wont study in my undergrad curriculum for fun. They are exciting as any scenario, actually even better because they enable me to write my own life scenario. Don't think they are tiring much and they are broadening my understanding in a way.
As a physics undergrad, i will have some introduction to electronics but still i think understanding thought process of engineering branches and other sciences does only good to me. Free,easy,fun.
Kaan Kara what kind of drugs are you on?
@@yoyoclockEbay those which you never took. Science is the way of life. He's taking science.
My right ear taught me EECS while my left ear taught me patience.
at his speed this professor can teach two classes in one
I envy all the guys at MIT, they get such good profs.
my favorite online professor after sal khan of khan academy.
really benefit from the lectures,thanks you very much---a Chinese student
For Android: settings -> accessibility -> audio -> audio adjustments -> mono
Now your left ear can learn too.
If my teachers were this good, i would have had such a better university experience.
Good stuff, helps solidify what I'm currently learning. :)
th-cam.com/video/Y9sNFx7enFQ/w-d-xo.html
i hope i own this class this coming quarter because of this guy
How did we gather that the resistance of the two resistors in parallel is equal to (R2+R3)/(R2R3) at 31:44? He said that conductance is equal to the reciprocal of resistance. Wouldn't that mean that (G1 + G2 = (1/R2)+ (1/R3)) not (G1+G2 = (R2R3) / (R2+R3))? Thanks
Pedro Casultsan
G12 = G1 + G2 = (1/R2) + (1/R3) = R2/R2R3 + R3/R2R3 = (R2+R3)/R2R3
R12 = 1/G12 = R2R3/(R2+R3)
Thanks
how are you jumping from (1/R2) + (1/R3) = R2/R2R3 + R3/R2R3, in other words, how does 1/R2 = R2/R2R3 ?
Juan Manuel it doesn’t, 1/R2=R3/R2R3
@davestoj i mean if i have a power supply of 12v , then further down the circuit a voltage regulator outputting 5 volts and further down an even lower regulator giving me 3.3 volts , and if i did not know the part number of the regulators and needed to find out how much voltage is going through a certain point/part of a circuit couldnt i just stick a multimeter to the regulators common grnd and output pin and thus get how much voltage is going through that part of the circuit
Thank god for MIT.
@Indrid77 go to ocw.mit.edu, find the course under electrical engi and materials as well as the name of the text is there
Could remnisciate my memories of Physics class lectures in High School
th-cam.com/video/Y9sNFx7enFQ/w-d-xo.html
at 31:46, he's combining the conductances r2 and r3. Why is his sum (r2*r3)/(r2+r3) and not (r2+r3)/(r2*r3)? Was that a typo or am I missing something?
1/R = 1/r3+ 1/r2
1/R = r2/r3r2 + r3/r2r3 = (r2+r3)/(r2*r3)
R=(r2*r3)/(r2+r3)
I think you forgot to take the reciprocal
There really weren't many pixels to go around back in 2008.
Kirchoffs laws make more sense from a logical standpoint i.e. sum of all voltage drops equal supply and currents entering a node is equal to currents leaving. That makes total sense. This lump element stuff just convolutes everything.
@stucak88 - no they aren't, because they make much more noise, are harder to clean and to write on. The last two are supported by your large coefficient of friction argument. Thanks for that one xD
im getting more than three independent equations( see 22:48), am i doing something wrong?
a: i0+i1+i4 = 0
b: i2+i3-i1 = 0
c: -i2-i5-i0 = 0
d: -i3+i5-i4 = 0
Not sure if you are kidding or meant it as a joke but you don't have a legitamite loop going through i3, i5, i4.
i3, i5, and i2 are legitamite.
And i3, i4 and i1 are legitamite.
But i3, i5 and i4 don't even loop at all.
thank you
BrinkTheGamer Not sure if you are kidding or meant it as a joke but he doesnt talk about loops hes doing nodes and in d node you have i3 i4 and i5
this is great..... very helpful for us students
To be honest, i'm not sure it matters. I know for certain I learned that it's positive into the node and negative leaving. But as long as it ends as 0...it really don't matter.
This is part of MIT's OCW initiative. MIT probably has worked out an agreement with google/youtube.
Lots of energy. Handled the sleepy head with great sarcasm.
Please SOMEBODY help me. I can't get currents' directions in KCL and NODE method. I think there is mistake in taking current directions.
You know I was studied that everything should be very strict. How can 3 currents all be positive!
io + i1 + i4 = 0. Ok we have other equations and can get that i0 (or i1, i4) is negative finally. BUT, if we make similar misassumption in other equations - everything can go wrong.
And we have voltage source since when current is going inside source, it should go from positive to negative. if we have voltage consuming device, I could understand that, but not with voltage source.
Also similar is true for (e1-Vo)G1+(e1-e2)G3+(e1)G2=0. All current is going inside/outside node? We have only 2 equation with all signs positive. How it can be? Currents just travels where they want?
He is very flexible. But for someone who only starts electronics without having experience in KCL calculations, it can hurt understanding from the very beginning
Ahaha you and the MIT professor are over complicating things way too much. Kirchoff's Current basically says that the current throughout a series circuit is always the same. So in basic series circuits all current drops are the same no matter the resistor or load.
Kirchoff's Voltage says that the voltage source is equal to the sum of the voltage drops in a series circuit. So Vs (Voltage Source) = V1 + V2 + V3...
Basically that's all you really need to know starting off, anymore will make your head hurt if you don't know too much about circuiting. Honestly I learned all of this at a Community College and I find it much easier to learn it there then at MIT. Even though in the end you learn the same exact things, it's just that you have much smaller classes and more personal one on one time with your professor. That and this guy's handwriting, accent, and method of "simplifying" things are really confusing.
He's a good teacher for MIT students I'm assuming, I can't see him as a good teacher for people who are looking for simple explanations of how circuiting works and basic introductions. However I personally know there are better teachers out there that can explain the same things in a much more simplistic and easier way, but I don't think that's what he's trying to go for.
jebril But we were dealing with paralel circuitry. Directions of currents affect their signs regarding to each node.
jebril
Well, you are actually agreeing with TheTimurbest. That is, in your analysis, rearranging your equation becomes 0 = -Vs + V1 + V2 + ... So, keeping track of the signs properly is important. And, the Prof does have an error, it appears to me.
The prof was right i think,
I got confused regarding the polarity too after the lecture and followed the tutorial below,
www.electronics-tutorials.ws/dccircuits/dcp_4.html
Polarity of the current should be relative to the direction of the current from the node. (either the arrow coming in or going out of the node)
Let say you make
Current going out of node=positive
Current coming into node=negative
so the equation at 43:44 .
(e2-Vo)G4+(e2-e1)G3+(e2)G5+(-I1)=0
(positive)G4+(positive)G3+(postive)G5+(negative)=0
I think he mad a mistake of the current direction of I。
I don't understand the selection for the ground node. It looks to me like a long side that includes three nodes, not a single node.
wow this make my circuit Analyze class i took before like child play!!
@myztic123 Chalkboards are the best. Much more better than whiteboards, because they are cheaper and they have bigger coefficient of friction.
at 12:29 why does anant measure voltages instead of amps ? help I'm confused
He just made a mistake. Nothink to bend your head.
@NAGRAL very happy to donate my money to keep mit ocw available for you for free !
cant you do all this with a multimeter and get the voltage at each point?
Maybe for simple circuits, but when you have a very complicated circuit/module, it could become very complex. This is laying the foundation to understand complex circuit designs, or designing a circuit that does not yet exist.
09.31 - The final result would have been even more impressive if he had said "-1.63" rather than "-1.6"; this was the main source of "experimental error" for why the first loop did not quite sum to zero.
How could more people have heard of Gaussian elimination than taken a class in Linear Algebra? Good question.
Why is he taking current at every node to be outwards?
Thank you your courses help me to improve my knowledge
th-cam.com/video/Y9sNFx7enFQ/w-d-xo.html
Turn on mono audio for better results
thanks for course
At 20:27 how is io flowing into positive of vo? Shouldnt arrow be other way around?
it doesn't matter, you can define any current direction, just don't forget to add positive/negative when you build the equations
When voltage sources are added in parallel.. What will be the net terminal voltage??
Which ever is higher
why speak interms of actual 9indicated voltages rises and drops with rises being +...?
What is the definition of voltage in the languge of maxwell equations
in 18:32 io must be going out from the source not into the source i guess
Thanks MIT
Those with earphones, connect it little bit loose it will help
i dont even go to school im a NEET but because of my autism i start learning about random topics i find interesting
@eddiea6987 Indeed you could. Through the point of this analysis is to determine unknown voltages and currents without having to physically measure them. For something like voltage regulators, it's just easiest to physically measure their voltages.
th-cam.com/video/Y9sNFx7enFQ/w-d-xo.html
yeah thanks a lot !!these videos are really good..
Is there a syllabus to this course as I'd like to see the course outline.
ocw.mit.edu/6-002S07
Some physics and calculus, and you will be ready my son.
great lesson, thanks
Why do these lectures look like they were recorded with a potato?
These videos were converted from quarter screen (320x240) Real Media files.
It is the first lecture in the semester, so it tends to be an easy introduction, which sometimes gives students the false impression that the subject will be easy. Normal lectures are 50 minutes. Most universities have 50 minute lectures.
because they are old
+MIT OpenCourseWare so, that means loss of quality, right?
Yeah maybe just loss of video quality
he is great
I clearly have no academic background in EE this is coming from my very new hobbyist perspective , try not to chastise me so much sir. but constructive criticism and corrections are very welcomed
th-cam.com/video/Y9sNFx7enFQ/w-d-xo.html
Amazing.
Hi, someone noes for which level are these cours ? bachelor, Master degree ?
this is helpful ❤️🤍
why do they use giant chalks at MIT???
do they still use chalkboards??
Why is the equivalent resistance of two resistors R1 and R2 in parallel equal to (R1*R2)/(R1+R2)?
+Matthew Ferrie because the total 1/resistance in parallel circuit IS 1/r1 + 1/r2 so 1/R total = r1+r2 / r1*r2 == SO R total in parallel circuit is (R1*R2)/(R1+R2)
Dude, I have no idea, ask God. He's the one who made Physics.
留跡 可惜太慢學node method 不然普物用這個方法快多了..
from which book I will read so that I can clear the concept
Foundations of Analog and Digital Electronic Circuits (The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Computer Architecture and Design) -- if it is not too late :)
Please thumbs up if you would like to see Prof Agarwal to teach more opencourseware electronics classes.
Thanks MIT :-))))
Do you need any prior knowledge for this course? I am on the second lecture and understand very little of it thus far.
dany2boy don't worry about it, I don't understand absolutely nothing from this either.
Man, those are some vintage resistors! :-)
th-cam.com/video/Y9sNFx7enFQ/w-d-xo.html
What software is used on the right screen?
write a program by yourself lol
ps. matlab is ok, but i prefer octave since it's can use online
Now I know why I went to law school.
can i watch lab. courses too?
thanks 🤍❤️
thankyou
Are lectures of 6.061 or 6.690 there on you tube?
Which simulation software interface being used?
+Priyal Ayal They had a camera pointed at a real circuit.
this educational theory seems to follow the star trek (picard) theory where as people take high standards of education for the betterment of mankind not for money or selfish reasons, in a world where currency has been done away with.
sure, and lots more :P
@nicknamethieves in my engineering classes there is only 2 girls in each class....:(