We have a modern day equivalent of him Jagan Mohan Reddy, who accepted Amaravati as capital and then when he became CM tried to move it 600km away to Visakhapatnam. After people kicked him out in 2024 elections, the capital moved back to Amaravati.
Mere ghar ke pass hai ye tughlakabad Delhi me aur sarkar ne ghanta kaam nahi kiya hai ye kila apne dam par khada hai Abhi tak. Iske opposite site it me ek aur bada kila hai jo pura khandar ho chuka hai aur kuchh log usme illegally rahte hain@@anmolwadekar1229
Yet he fought off the mongols who conquerd for china to poland and Austria so he he wasnt all that stupid. Making coinage in copper makes it more accessible to the common man meaning the economy grows and there is more trade and exchange of goods and services.
He didn't change it to copper , he changed it to bronze which was of same value as silver so it incurred huge losses. Jab gyan na ho to faltu ka comment mat karo @akshay
The last one is not an impulsive measure he took.Kublai Khan successfully experimented with it beforehand in China and Tughlug decided to implement it in India.But the only flaws was that he did not put up counter-check measures to stop private minting of those coins.
@@vypa-bk1iyBro literally all his policies failed and because of hime millions died he was an eccentric fool who can not do anything properly after all he was a dumb muslim
Its due to Hindus emotional nature this Mad man was left alive In Mewar, Muhammad bin Tughlaq faced strong resistance from the Rajput rulers, especially from **Hammir Singh (Rana Hammirdev)** of the **Sisodia dynasty**. Hammir Singh, who ruled Mewar during the 14th century, successfully resisted Muhammad bin Tughlaq’s attempts to expand his control into Rajputana. Muhammad bin Tughlaq launched campaigns against Mewar as part of his attempts to consolidate and expand the Delhi Sultanate’s territory. However, Rana Hammir not only resisted these invasions but also managed to reclaim and restore Mewar's independence. He is credited with reviving the kingdom of Mewar after previous setbacks and establishing it as a strong Rajput state. Hammir Singh’s resistance is seen as a significant victory that prevented Muhammad bin Tughlaq from establishing dominance in Mewar, solidifying Mewar’s reputation as a resilient Rajput kingdom that continued to resist northern invasions.
@@arush_zytkyu ki isko kaid kr liya tha aur uss samay kingdom ke pass( mewar) to choorna pada aur ise badle ghode hathi aur paise mile jo mewar ke reconstruction ke liye jarruri tha kyu khilji ne bahut todfod ki thi raval ratan singh ko harane ke baad
are rehn de bhai, kaahe ka resistence ye sab apni ladkiyan deke baithe the . jija bana liya tha mughlo ko or unme akbar ko chhod k koi bhi dhang ka ruler tha bhi nahi fir bhi inki himmat na hui unko aankh dikha de, bhala ho maratha jat sikh ka jo aurangzeb k last days me hila paaye mughals ko
Same muhhamed bi tuglau who dared to attack Mewar and was kept as a prisoner ny mighty Rana Hammir, forcing the delhi sultunate to pay a heavy compenstatoin for his release.
@@creatorlight4346muhd tughlaq was no just king, they kept tax more than 1/2 of peasants produce and trade kept decreasing by their fellow invaders too
In Russia they had st petesburg and kiev and now Mosco .The Roman empire had Rome Revanna and Constantinople .ugals had Lahore Delhi and Agra so why this sultan is called psycho Just being curious
He was not psycho, he was just ahead of his time. Look delhi as a location for capital of india is not even a ideal place today, in the medival it was more unsafe due to the constant attacks from north. All of us are using paper currency today, he tried to implement in 13th century.
You guys are wrong. He was highly educated & a visionary king. His decision was ahead of time. Bin Tughlaq valued wise person & knowledge, thats why he forced ibn batuta to stay in his court.
@@db417 Cruelty was very common that time. You are judging several 100 past years standard according to present. Once human must had to marry sisters right?
1)Hazrat Nizamuddin was sufi sant from Delhi he was having rivalry with Ghiyasuddin.. and Md. Bin Tughalak was follower of Hazrat so he killed Ghiyasuddin... 2)Md. Bin Tughalak was most educated sultan of Delhi 3) Jaunpur was built by Md. Bin Tughalak cousin in his rememberance
Even many non-Muslim kings and emperors killed many lives during their conquests and there was no Hindus during tughlak regime, Because the people of subcontinent was never considered themselves as Hindus first of all
@@byonce3254islamic kings ruled like this............ The difference b/w Muhammed tugalq and other muslim kings was that he was more cruel and never listen to the court..... Even killed most of them but other kings were never opposing kwajas and ummah
Devgiri ka इतिहास apne app me महान हैं पर बहा yadavo क़ा शासन था इसलिये उसे उतनी प्रसिद्धि नहीं मिली क्या devgiri क़ा इतिहास सिर्फ़ एक सुल्तान के राजधानी बदलने तक सीमित है
@@neeteshyadavbundelkhand3615 यादव वंश के अंतिम शासक शंकर देव ने दिल्ली सल्तनत का विरोध किया, पर अपनी शक्ति का उन्नयन नही कर सके। ना ही समय के अनुसार अपनी रणनीति और कूटनीति में कोई बदलाव ला पाए। सबसे बड़ी बात, उस समय भारत के अंदर सबसे शक्तिशाली राज्य होते हुए भी देश को इकट्ठा नहीं किया, और मुसलमानों के धोखे में फंस गए।
@@shobhitshukla5697 me app ki Baat se kuch had tak sehmat hu pr tatkalin rajniti me esa ho pna sambhab tha ki nahi ye raja Shankar Dev se accha koi nahi jaan sakta tha pr unhone gulami स्वीकार nhi ki or vidhroh kiya लेकिन durbhagya to ye hai ham yadavo ka ki hm hamesa baghi rahe pr हमारे लिए इतिहास me utna mahatv nahi diya गया jitna ki उनको jinhone Bahari akrantao ki ha me ha kaha unki gulami ki app samajdar pratit hote hai app khud bataiye mahoday ki kya lekhko ne हमारे साथ जत्ततिi nahi ki........?
@@neeteshyadavbundelkhand3615 बिल्कुल की गई, और सभी के साथ हुई, कौन सा लेखक हिंदुओं के विषय में सत्य लिख पाया? और जिसने लिखा उसको भी सरकारों ने अपने अपने लाभ के अनुसार लिखवाया। दुख की बात तो यह है की दो राज्यों में मुख्य भूमिका में होते हुए भी यदुवंश ने ऐतिहासिक वैभव और उन्नति के बारे मे सोचने और उसके लिए प्रयास करने के अतिरिक्त सब कुछ किया। मैं दोष नहीं दे रहा, केवल अपनी आशाएं व्यक्त कर रहा हूं, उम्मीद है कि कोई इसे सुने और प्रयास करे
Well He did in order to avoid invasions from Mongols at that time who were troubling for Indian rulers, his move to Deccan failed as due to notable points such as he decided to move in summer where temperature heat isn't suitable for transportations. His notable failures if you see are sharp turns or one can say he was discreet and unpredictable about his decisions plus like all of the kings in Delhi sultanate wasn't much of a Emperor but more of moody man which isn't a notable quality for the king.
@@A_Shanto According to James Tod - Hamir, supported by every chief in Mewar, marched to meet him. The armies met at Singoli, and after a bloody encounter Mahmúd (Successor of Alauddin khilji ) was defeated and made prisoner. He was confined for three months in Chaitur , and only released when he had agreed to surrender Ajmír, Rinthambúr, an important fortress in the south-east corner of the state, and Nágor, and to pay an indemnity of six lakhs of rupees and a hundred elephants . James Tod also said Mewar was the most powerful kingdom of Bharat for 200 years after regaining chittoor . Almost all muhamad kings surrendered before Mewar . Unfortunately he didn't mention the Hamir and tukgak war . Historians have no muslim sources of war it is because no one wants to tell his story of defeat . Mewar source and Jain temple inscription tells about the war and tukgak imprisonment.
@@A_Shanto There are many such cases where the king regains their power after the loss of his power . Majhabat khan imprisoned Jhangir that doesn't mean Jhangir couldn't regain power . According to historian Ojha Hamir defeated Tughlaq and Jain inscription also tells the story . You should believe on leftist historians according to them Mewar was part of the Delhi Sultanate at the time of Maharana Hamir 😂 . They showed the whole of India on the map of the Delhi sultanate 😂 even the small kingdom of Himachal defeated Muhammad bin Tughlaq and this is described also by muslim historian farista .
Reality is pretty different he was the most educated King in Indian History though he was a Mad King but highly educated. That also shows only education is not enough for being a ruler.
Little do people know of the fact this guy was actually very intelligent and smart person the thing that went wrong with has got to do with the implementation policies and his officials who were not very cooperative with him therefore he got a title infamously called as the “wisest fool “ lol
From what I have read about him his decision to shift capital was a good one cause Daulatabad was at central point of his empire but he failed to understand why Delhi had been the capital cause of threats from middle East which he realised later he had many failures but those were actually good plans but executed poorly to just call him mad King is stupid he already has a title of Wise fool Mad King shows him as a sadistic king but he was not in fact it was under his reign punishment got easier from previous rulers which resulted in heavy corruption it was his easy going nature that weakened his empire not cause he was mad he would have much stricter punishments and would rule much harsher and when ibn battuta and he had disgreements he would have killed him but he didn't this is just click bait and false info
@@CingoSurname akbar wasnt like him, akbars economical, secular policies made the mughal grow wealthier and acceptable among neighbouring indian kingdoms. It is in his reign mughals rapidly expanded. Akbar was one of the greatest king . Meanwhile tuqlaqs economic reforms was a disaster. His religious intolerance against ahmadiya, shia and others was well known. Increasing the jeziya and taxes caused the hindu farmers in gangetic plain to abandon their job and run in to jungles. Truely he was a 'mad king'.
@@Dheeraj-y4fDon't say foolishness. Harihara and Bukka, the founders of Vijayanagara Empire is actually Slaves of Muhammad Bin Tuqlaq. The ran away from him and established a small City state called Vijayanagara. It is not even hard enough to defeat a mighty empire like Delhi Sultanate. Actually Vijayanagara is a small kingdom until the time of Krishnadevaraya. He defeated other South Indian kingdoms like Hoysala Kingdom, Later Chola - Chera - Pandya etc. and Vijayanagara Empire include a region of Andra, Telengana, Tamil nadu, North part of Kerala and even Sri lanka. After his regin Vijayanagara empire starts declaining and later defeted and declained by Deccan Sultanates.
@@Naifnavas8707 hari hara and bukka wasnt slaves of tuqlak i dont know from where do u get all those fake information. They were only prisoners for a few time .
@@Dheeraj-y4f the Maharashtra government officially issued a notification on the change of names of Aurangabad and Osmanabad districts as Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar and Dharashiv, respectively.
I have nothing about India... But Ibn Battuta was known as liar as far as I know.. As example he claimed he met Ibn Taymiyya in Egypt, while other contemporaries suggest otherwise
I dont understand if hindus were slaves for so called 1000 years how come the population is 120 crores against 18 crs in india , 18 crs in pakistan and 16 crs in Bangladesh damn 😂😂
Not just muslims but even Christian missonaries accepted that you cant convert hindus philosophically. Abrahamic beliefs work as political company whose only goal is to spread. The only thing they could use is fear or greed. Converting prisoners of war, capturing women as prizes of war, and sometimes asking a royal to convert to Islam for better position was the only recorded ways muslims could convert hindus, if you will read some delhi sultanate books, they knew that muslims were as little as “salt in a dish” and therefore this could never be an Islamic nation. Christians used mainly greed to convert vulnerable people even at their death beds, british missonaries destroyed Indian education system and started converting tribals by providing them food while the british kept looting Indian lands and caused multiples famines where millions of peasants died, but Christians also converted by force, portugese and people like Francis xavier being some example. Muslims were way way less in number just before few centuries ago but since then they have had the highest fertility rate in India and still pumping babies like crazy to change the demographics, as taught by their maulvis
Cause they can't digest that during Mughal rule India was prosperous...and their religion don't consider everyone equal so some converted to islam by themselves
@@mahirahasankarim1358usee prosperous mauryan empire tha aur thik yha mughal akabar ke samay mea lekin usse muslim real muslim nhi mante kyuki h aurangzeb ki tarah hindo se tax nhi leta tha kattar muslim nhi tha
1000 saal tk slaves kiya madarsa se padha muje yeh samaj nhi ata dehi sulatane wale ek chote se mewar ko kabja nhi kr paye poore bharat pr kabja kr liye bs aurangzeb ke samay sabse jada lad muslim ke pass tha pr tamilnadu side nhi jiit paye thea north east mea ahom dynasty tha usko kabja nhi kr paye aur bol rhe ho 1000 saal slaves thea jaise hi aurangzeb ne kabja kiya ussi samay maratha ayenaur pura maap hi badal diya toh kya muslim hindu ke slaves bangye maratha ke samay mea. Aur rhi population ki bs hindu nhi thea boodh bohot sare rehte thea aur jain bhi iska example yeh hai ki jb Bangladesh bna tb 30 %hindun the ab 6% ke pass hai aise population ghata aur pakistan ka baat na kro toh accha hai sindh se lekr kabul afghanistan tk bodh hindu aur jain rehte thea ya toh maar gye yah convert abhi bhi kuch muslim hindu surname lagate hai padle Wikipedia pr
@@AnmolSingh-ur6lg that’s because Indian constitution restricts him doing so… orelse he wouldn’t have hesitated to act exactly like him….no matter what he is modern day Tughlaq and dictator
@@Dheeraj-y4f renowned Muslim scholar and jurist imam Ibn taymiyyah have given fatwa( legal opinion) that the Mughals were not Muslims because they are ardently following their Mongolic tengrist practices than Islamic practices
@@mytube1298this doesn’t take them out of the fold of Islam if they practiced these traditions still they were Muslims and the fatwa you mentioned is just an opinion of a scholar not something which is actually true
@@ayaan98734 their adherence to their unislamic practices and killing muslims who opposed those practices proves that they're not committed muslims so stop portraying them as flag bearers of Islam
@@mytube1298 this is the most stupidest thing I ever heard that killing Muslims takes you out of the fold of Islam when we talk about Fitnah meaning corruption in the land and civil wars like at time of Arabs they were facing of other Muslims who might have bad intentions and you needed to take power or else they will take power and kill you, so it’s nothing new that Turks did this doesn’t take them out of the fold of Islam. Best example when a Muslims kills someone unjustly Muslims or non Muslim he has committed a sin and god would judge them on the day of judgment
Mohammed bin tughlaq was famous for his failed expedition but on good note he was the only sultan who was most tolerent , he thinks for his people but he was not well versed with his time and many historians wrote wrong about him
He was a leader a hero a legend. He wanted to save the population from mongol massacre. the mongols had conquered the whole planet all upto hungry and only Tughlaq State was opposing them at that time in Asia
We have a modern day equivalent of him Jagan Mohan Reddy, who accepted Amaravati as capital and then when he became CM tried to move it 600km away to Visakhapatnam. After people kicked him out in 2024 elections, the capital moved back to Amaravati.
Papam ikkada kuda ragging aa?
And you are a shoe licker of CBN
Their Tughlaq looks a lot like the standup comedian Sandeep Sharma 😂
Where you saw the photo? Must be in some museum I guess. This video just has random animation.
@@hits2152 Tughlaq must have looked like a joker.
He was a joker and a bad man. He is responsible for the deaths of many muslims.
@@asmirann3636he was favourite ruler of muslims ❤
@@abhinavyadav8806ram was latrine eating Dukkur VARAHA
Even back then he was standup comedian.
ASI and Delhi govt has done great job greening it. I used to pass by it 20 year ago
This fort is in Maharashtra
Dimag to theek h 😂😂@@anmolwadekar1229
Mere ghar ke pass hai ye tughlakabad Delhi me aur sarkar ne ghanta kaam nahi kiya hai ye kila apne dam par khada hai Abhi tak. Iske opposite site it me ek aur bada kila hai jo pura khandar ho chuka hai aur kuchh log usme illegally rahte hain@@anmolwadekar1229
@@anmolwadekar1229he's talking about tughlakabad fort
People to Tughlaq : एक जगह पे कभी रुका नहीं, एक जगह पे कभी टिका नहीं
That was a good one
Brahmin baniya rajp00t ka Funda jo rule karre wah jija😂
As a History student of Medieval India....all the facts are clearly told in this video....😇✌️❣️
He was a sadist(enjoy other pain) , psycho (unpredictable behaviour) & fool(change gold coin to copper coin) 😂
Yet he fought off the mongols who conquerd for china to poland and Austria so he he wasnt all that stupid. Making coinage in copper makes it more accessible to the common man meaning the economy grows and there is more trade and exchange of goods and services.
He didn't change it to copper , he changed it to bronze which was of same value as silver so it incurred huge losses. Jab gyan na ho to faltu ka comment mat karo @akshay
The last one is not an impulsive measure he took.Kublai Khan successfully experimented with it beforehand in China and Tughlug decided to implement it in India.But the only flaws was that he did not put up counter-check measures to stop private minting of those coins.
@@vypa-bk1iyBro literally all his policies failed and because of hime millions died he was an eccentric fool who can not do anything properly after all he was a dumb muslim
@@vypa-bk1iy Did these turks stop the massacre of thousands in Delhi at the hands of timur?
Its due to Hindus emotional nature this Mad man was left alive
In Mewar, Muhammad bin Tughlaq faced strong resistance from the Rajput rulers, especially from **Hammir Singh (Rana Hammirdev)** of the **Sisodia dynasty**. Hammir Singh, who ruled Mewar during the 14th century, successfully resisted Muhammad bin Tughlaq’s attempts to expand his control into Rajputana.
Muhammad bin Tughlaq launched campaigns against Mewar as part of his attempts to consolidate and expand the Delhi Sultanate’s territory. However, Rana Hammir not only resisted these invasions but also managed to reclaim and restore Mewar's independence. He is credited with reviving the kingdom of Mewar after previous setbacks and establishing it as a strong Rajput state.
Hammir Singh’s resistance is seen as a significant victory that prevented Muhammad bin Tughlaq from establishing dominance in Mewar, solidifying Mewar’s reputation as a resilient Rajput kingdom that continued to resist northern invasions.
what does this have to do with "hindus emotional nature"???/ tf you mean
Wasnt this the mewari king who kept one of the Tughlaqs as a prisoner too? 😂
Exactly true
@@arush_zytkyu ki isko kaid kr liya tha aur uss samay kingdom ke pass( mewar) to choorna pada aur ise badle ghode hathi aur paise mile jo mewar ke reconstruction ke liye jarruri tha kyu khilji ne bahut todfod ki thi raval ratan singh ko harane ke baad
are rehn de bhai, kaahe ka resistence ye sab apni ladkiyan deke baithe the . jija bana liya tha mughlo ko or unme akbar ko chhod k koi bhi dhang ka ruler tha bhi nahi fir bhi inki himmat na hui unko aankh dikha de, bhala ho maratha jat sikh ka jo aurangzeb k last days me hila paaye mughals ko
Same muhhamed bi tuglau who dared to attack Mewar and was kept as a prisoner ny mighty Rana Hammir, forcing the delhi sultunate to pay a heavy compenstatoin for his release.
That was only 1-2 years after him becoming emperor.
@@creatorlight4346muhd tughlaq was no just king, they kept tax more than 1/2 of peasants produce and trade kept decreasing by their fellow invaders too
All Rajput women's were s3x slaves of tuglaq
They were very intelligent to let go the emperor for mere compensation.😂😂😂
IQ level of so called Umbrellas can be clearly noted.
@@indrajeet Rajput men were pimps of Rajput women's to muslum court and sultans of delhi
In Russia they had st petesburg and kiev and now Mosco .The Roman empire had Rome Revanna and Constantinople .ugals had Lahore Delhi and Agra so why this sultan is called psycho Just being curious
he forced the entire population to move, he didnt simply change the capital.
They all Are especially those in power are addicted
Great Content ,Keep uploading such interesting videos in Tamil.
😂😂 No Tamil.
What?@@sage.rivendell
Fantastic, I love these lesser known insights to Indian history. Thank you.
He was not psycho, he was just ahead of his time. Look delhi as a location for capital of india is not even a ideal place today, in the medival it was more unsafe due to the constant attacks from north. All of us are using paper currency today, he tried to implement in 13th century.
bloody peaceful
He was responsible of starting of Decline of Delhi Sultanate.......
Delhi sultanate is over-hyped and nothing in front of the Mewar kingdom
Tughlaq was a Turk, He was mongoloid... Their Tughlaq looks like Nadir Ali.
tughlaq was born to a jat lady in punjab
@@Dheeraj-y4fwas it his dad of Mongolian descent
@@tyriq7328 turko - mongol i think
Just as in the case of the Mughals, intermarriage with Indians had rendered their features caucasoid.
Turk are turkmenistan .modren day kazakh uzbek kyzgyz tajiks turkis east turkistan(xingxiang) mongol are differnt
Keep uploading awesome content
I also want to join your crazy team.
How can I?
Please respond
Is there a full video of this?
You guys are wrong. He was highly educated & a visionary king. His decision was ahead of time. Bin Tughlaq valued wise person & knowledge, thats why he forced ibn batuta to stay in his court.
He was the ancient world equivalent of Donald Trump but with 100 times the cruelty and absolute power
How the fuck do u know????.u never met or talked to him
@@db417how so?
@@db417Donald Trump is not that bad as you think. He is a little aggressive, but he cares about his own citizens.
@@db417 Cruelty was very common that time. You are judging several 100 past years standard according to present. Once human must had to marry sisters right?
I been there in 2007 when i was in 7th grade. It’s in Maharashtra (Sambhaji Nagar)
1)Hazrat Nizamuddin was sufi sant from Delhi he was having rivalry with Ghiyasuddin.. and Md. Bin Tughalak was follower of Hazrat so he killed Ghiyasuddin...
2)Md. Bin Tughalak was most educated sultan of Delhi
3) Jaunpur was built by Md. Bin Tughalak cousin in his rememberance
Most educated sultans dont loot peasants lmao
@ambujrajput8817 if greed takes over then nothing can be said
the amount of hindus he executed and converted
Hell yeah bro
Even many non-Muslim kings and emperors killed many lives during their conquests and there was no Hindus during tughlak regime, Because the people of subcontinent was never considered themselves as Hindus first of all
He is plain mad king what you expect
@@Mushu-q2t Israel hell yeah ❤ hindus should take revenge
@@byonce3254islamic kings ruled like this............ The difference b/w Muhammed tugalq and other muslim kings was that he was more cruel and never listen to the court..... Even killed most of them but other kings were never opposing kwajas and ummah
Devgiri ka इतिहास apne app me महान हैं पर बहा yadavo क़ा शासन था इसलिये उसे उतनी प्रसिद्धि नहीं मिली क्या devgiri क़ा इतिहास सिर्फ़ एक सुल्तान के राजधानी बदलने तक सीमित है
महान यादव वंश की राजधानी देवगिरी की कथा हृदयविदारक है। पर कहने में दुख होता है की यादवों ने इतिहास से कुछ नहीं सीखा।
@@shobhitshukla5697 आपके कहने का क्या tatparya hai mahoday
@@neeteshyadavbundelkhand3615 यादव वंश के अंतिम शासक शंकर देव ने दिल्ली सल्तनत का विरोध किया, पर अपनी शक्ति का उन्नयन नही कर सके। ना ही समय के अनुसार अपनी रणनीति और कूटनीति में कोई बदलाव ला पाए। सबसे बड़ी बात, उस समय भारत के अंदर सबसे शक्तिशाली राज्य होते हुए भी देश को इकट्ठा नहीं किया, और मुसलमानों के धोखे में फंस गए।
@@shobhitshukla5697 me app ki Baat se kuch had tak sehmat hu pr tatkalin rajniti me esa ho pna sambhab tha ki nahi ye raja Shankar Dev se accha koi nahi jaan sakta tha pr unhone gulami स्वीकार nhi ki or vidhroh kiya लेकिन durbhagya to ye hai ham yadavo ka ki hm hamesa baghi rahe pr हमारे लिए इतिहास me utna mahatv nahi diya गया jitna ki उनको jinhone Bahari akrantao ki ha me ha kaha unki gulami ki app samajdar pratit hote hai app khud bataiye mahoday ki kya lekhko ne हमारे साथ जत्ततिi nahi ki........?
@@neeteshyadavbundelkhand3615 बिल्कुल की गई, और सभी के साथ हुई, कौन सा लेखक हिंदुओं के विषय में सत्य लिख पाया? और जिसने लिखा उसको भी सरकारों ने अपने अपने लाभ के अनुसार लिखवाया। दुख की बात तो यह है की दो राज्यों में मुख्य भूमिका में होते हुए भी यदुवंश ने ऐतिहासिक वैभव और उन्नति के बारे मे सोचने और उसके लिए प्रयास करने के अतिरिक्त सब कुछ किया। मैं दोष नहीं दे रहा, केवल अपनी आशाएं व्यक्त कर रहा हूं, उम्मीद है कि कोई इसे सुने और प्रयास करे
He was psychotic....he hold the empire and protected India from Mongols...😂
Well He did in order to avoid invasions from Mongols at that time who were troubling for Indian rulers, his move to Deccan failed as due to notable points such as he decided to move in summer where temperature heat isn't suitable for transportations. His notable failures if you see are sharp turns or one can say he was discreet and unpredictable about his decisions plus like all of the kings in Delhi sultanate wasn't much of a Emperor but more of moody man which isn't a notable quality for the king.
Shows once again that British rule was a benison to all India, land of hot-heads.
Cl0wn go learn about
Anglo Mughal War, you didn't came to power by defeating.
You Came to power by bribery & deceit.
@@SimhaArya-zu7vo brits were never good in fights anyways tho, they won ww1 because of indians, they glaze themselves so hard its funny
Shut up old man, your people were troglodytes when Indians were building civilisations 5000 years ago
british was the darkest era for india
And rajput imprison tughlak just to enjoy king of delhi was a slave to mewari rajputs
this story is exaggerate denied by historian
@@A_Shanto According to James Tod - Hamir, supported by every chief in Mewar, marched to meet him. The armies met at Singoli, and after a bloody encounter Mahmúd (Successor of Alauddin khilji ) was defeated and made prisoner. He was confined for three months in Chaitur , and only released when he had agreed to surrender Ajmír, Rinthambúr, an important fortress in the south-east corner of the state, and Nágor, and to pay an indemnity of six lakhs of rupees and a hundred elephants . James Tod also said Mewar was the most powerful kingdom of Bharat for 200 years after regaining chittoor . Almost all muhamad kings surrendered before Mewar . Unfortunately he didn't mention the Hamir and tukgak war . Historians have no muslim sources of war it is because no one wants to tell his story of defeat . Mewar source and Jain temple inscription tells about the war and tukgak imprisonment.
@@ashutoshkumarsingh8399 if he was prisoned his throne will have usurp by other but that things doesn't happened so its clearly fake story
Jay mughalputana 😂😂 fake history wale Chhatri.
Rajputo na to kudh Tuglak ko apni beti di thi😂
@@A_Shanto There are many such cases where the king regains their power after the loss of his power . Majhabat khan imprisoned Jhangir that doesn't mean Jhangir couldn't regain power . According to historian Ojha Hamir defeated Tughlaq and Jain inscription also tells the story . You should believe on leftist historians according to them Mewar was part of the Delhi Sultanate at the time of Maharana Hamir 😂 . They showed the whole of India on the map of the Delhi sultanate 😂 even the small kingdom of Himachal defeated Muhammad bin Tughlaq and this is described also by muslim historian farista .
Magnificent
Sir, he has the company of Akbar, who built Fatehpur Sikri near Agra.
The only difference is the distance.
Reality is pretty different he was the most educated King in Indian History though he was a Mad King but highly educated. That also shows only education is not enough for being a ruler.
Little do people know of the fact this guy was actually very intelligent and smart person the thing that went wrong with has got to do with the implementation policies and his officials who were not very cooperative with him therefore he got a title infamously called as the “wisest fool “ lol
Just imagine koi ajkal jo sher bntey hain. Inko unke shaasan m puncture saatne wala bol deta. 😮
That's why in Bengal we call him Loony Sultan (Paagla Raja).
Bengalis call everyone by some or the other name,but they don’t know what others think of them.😂
I call him the king of misadventure
The mad journey just drained wealth of delhi.
Very hard to digest how allauddin Khilji captured this fort is very barbaric this fact should be tell it's very inhuman act.
He was smart enough to capture the impregnable fort.
The AMU product ❤️
Chlo chlo vapas delhi chlo 😅
The wisest of the fools.
MOVIE CLIP NAME
Nice content and just 50k views 😢
Source for all this?
History not whatsapp university.. go get education
@@thisnthat7760 just give me the source of this then if you're history learned
Naah he was called a wise fool as he’s moves were ahead of the time read some history
Bro we have andhra thuglaq known as jaglaq aka ys jagan mohan reddy
From what I have read about him his decision to shift capital was a good one cause Daulatabad was at central point of his empire but he failed to understand why Delhi had been the capital cause of threats from middle East which he realised later he had many failures but those were actually good plans but executed poorly to just call him mad King is stupid he already has a title of Wise fool Mad King shows him as a sadistic king but he was not in fact it was under his reign punishment got easier from previous rulers which resulted in heavy corruption it was his easy going nature that weakened his empire not cause he was mad he would have much stricter punishments and would rule much harsher and when ibn battuta and he had disgreements he would have killed him but he didn't this is just click bait and false info
We now have Modi Bin Tughlak
Acche ji.
@@ShivanshThakur-sh8ub think about demonetization
modi is not collecting jeziya
Bruh doy you know what is jizya🤦🏽♂️@@Dheeraj-y4f
@@razriswan7716 religious tax imposed on non muslims
Mai vahi raheta hu jaha kabhi Tughlaq ki rajdhani hua karti thi daulatabad ❤
Sambhaji nagar kya ??
@AshwaniSingh-os4tx haa
akbar is also like him therefore education is important
Any proof Mr?
@@viniths7683 don't you know that Akbar moves his capital from Agra to fathepursikhri and then again to Agra it is in class 7 history ncert 🤣😂😂😂
@@CingoSurname akbar wasnt like him, akbars economical, secular policies made the mughal grow wealthier and acceptable among neighbouring indian kingdoms. It is in his reign mughals rapidly expanded. Akbar was one of the greatest king . Meanwhile tuqlaqs economic reforms was a disaster. His religious intolerance against ahmadiya, shia and others was well known. Increasing the jeziya and taxes caused the hindu farmers in gangetic plain to abandon their job and run in to jungles. Truely he was a 'mad king'.
@@Dheeraj-y4f akber ordered genocide of chittur people in one day a town of 40000 civilians massacres by his forxes
Every king was including Ashoka. In medievtime you can't survive by being pacifist
Chhatrapati Shivaji amar rahe
Sadly he is not present at times chatrapati will born after 400 years of this current time of history
vijayanagara empire was a direct rival of tuqlaks and defeated them
@@Dheeraj-y4fDon't say foolishness. Harihara and Bukka, the founders of Vijayanagara Empire is actually Slaves of Muhammad Bin Tuqlaq. The ran away from him and established a small City state called Vijayanagara. It is not even hard enough to defeat a mighty empire like Delhi Sultanate. Actually Vijayanagara is a small kingdom until the time of Krishnadevaraya. He defeated other South Indian kingdoms like Hoysala Kingdom, Later Chola - Chera - Pandya etc. and Vijayanagara Empire include a region of Andra, Telengana, Tamil nadu, North part of Kerala and even Sri lanka. After his regin Vijayanagara empire starts declaining and later defeted and declained by Deccan Sultanates.
@@Naifnavas8707 hari hara and bukka wasnt slaves of tuqlak i dont know from where do u get all those fake information. They were only prisoners for a few time .
And with that he poked the Marathas
I knew without seeing the video who it was
@4:50 Pls correct it-------its not aurangabad it is Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar
is it official?
@@Dheeraj-y4f the Maharashtra government officially issued a notification on the change of names of Aurangabad and Osmanabad districts as Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar and Dharashiv, respectively.
All Sultans are That crazy !!!
Crazydude!
Ibon batuta a great historian, If u want to know about muslim rulers u must read his writings.
I have nothing about India... But Ibn Battuta was known as liar as far as I know..
As example he claimed he met Ibn Taymiyya in Egypt, while other contemporaries suggest otherwise
Who you decides to accuse him
Tughluq was Turk. Why he portrayed by an Indian actor?
I dont understand if hindus were slaves for so called 1000 years how come the population is 120 crores against 18 crs in india , 18 crs in pakistan and 16 crs in Bangladesh damn 😂😂
Not just muslims but even Christian missonaries accepted that you cant convert hindus philosophically.
Abrahamic beliefs work as political company whose only goal is to spread.
The only thing they could use is fear or greed.
Converting prisoners of war, capturing women as prizes of war, and sometimes asking a royal to convert to Islam for better position was the only recorded ways muslims could convert hindus, if you will read some delhi sultanate books, they knew that muslims were as little as “salt in a dish” and therefore this could never be an Islamic nation.
Christians used mainly greed to convert vulnerable people even at their death beds, british missonaries destroyed Indian education system and started converting tribals by providing them food while the british kept looting Indian lands and caused multiples famines where millions of peasants died, but Christians also converted by force, portugese and people like Francis xavier being some example.
Muslims were way way less in number just before few centuries ago but since then they have had the highest fertility rate in India and still pumping babies like crazy to change the demographics, as taught by their maulvis
Cause they can't digest that during Mughal rule India was prosperous...and their religion don't consider everyone equal so some converted to islam by themselves
@@mahirahasankarim1358usee prosperous mauryan empire tha aur thik yha mughal akabar ke samay mea lekin usse muslim real muslim nhi mante kyuki h aurangzeb ki tarah hindo se tax nhi leta tha kattar muslim nhi tha
1000 saal tk slaves kiya madarsa se padha muje yeh samaj nhi ata dehi sulatane wale ek chote se mewar ko kabja nhi kr paye poore bharat pr kabja kr liye bs aurangzeb ke samay sabse jada lad muslim ke pass tha pr tamilnadu side nhi jiit paye thea north east mea ahom dynasty tha usko kabja nhi kr paye aur bol rhe ho 1000 saal slaves thea jaise hi aurangzeb ne kabja kiya ussi samay maratha ayenaur pura maap hi badal diya toh kya muslim hindu ke slaves bangye maratha ke samay mea. Aur rhi population ki bs hindu nhi thea boodh bohot sare rehte thea aur jain bhi iska example yeh hai ki jb Bangladesh bna tb 30 %hindun the ab 6% ke pass hai aise population ghata aur pakistan ka baat na kro toh accha hai sindh se lekr kabul afghanistan tk bodh hindu aur jain rehte thea ya toh maar gye yah convert abhi bhi kuch muslim hindu surname lagate hai padle Wikipedia pr
It's like saying how come the jews alive if Nazi party had committed holocaust
Allauddin khilji defeated the Mongol army🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
Nope. He just let them do what they want. He didnt attack em.
He did not but his general mir zaffar defeated and give his life if not now north indians would look mongolic by now
he himself invader
And Chatrapati Shivaji defeated Turkish Mughals 😂 only converteds living in india 😂
@@byonce3254zaffar khan bro not mir zaffar😅
Jagan Mohan Reddy - modern day Tuglaq
great wall of india?
Aenys Tughlaq😂
Imagine the smell 😮
I love Mad rulers
Now we have narander modi bin tughlak
Aaj Bhi Iske Najayaz bacche Bharat mein Hai.
❤
Modi Bhi Tughlak hain ptanahi kab ulta sidh kadam uthale 😂😂😂😂😂
ONE SOUTH INDIA EX CM ALSO
Khilji and This person was the Reason For Expansion of Islam In India.
Master copy of Tuglak = Ex AP CM Jagan Mohan reddy
Tughlak equals the present executive head. Tughlak also did demonetisation.
Atleast u're alive under current executive head
Yes ...just like Owaisi brothers
@@AnmolSingh-ur6lg that’s because Indian constitution restricts him doing so… orelse he wouldn’t have hesitated to act exactly like him….no matter what he is modern day Tughlaq and dictator
@@viniths7683 he can remove the constitution naa by force and by collaboration with forces
Later on it's became disaster because of his psychoness
Zain bhai😂
Mashallah
I am in today's lowdatabad
No match for jagan reddy 😂😂😂
Britain unified India
But also divided in Bengal and finally Pakistan
britian partitioned india
True.
Turkish and Mughal emperors of india are not Islamicate but persianized turko- mongol people
they followed islam
@@Dheeraj-y4f renowned Muslim scholar and jurist imam Ibn taymiyyah have given fatwa( legal opinion) that the Mughals were not Muslims because they are ardently following their Mongolic tengrist practices than Islamic practices
@@mytube1298this doesn’t take them out of the fold of Islam if they practiced these traditions still they were Muslims and the fatwa you mentioned is just an opinion of a scholar not something which is actually true
@@ayaan98734 their adherence to their unislamic practices and killing muslims who opposed those practices proves that they're not committed muslims so stop portraying them as flag bearers of Islam
@@mytube1298 this is the most stupidest thing I ever heard that killing Muslims takes you out of the fold of Islam when we talk about Fitnah meaning corruption in the land and civil wars like at time of Arabs they were facing of other Muslims who might have bad intentions and you needed to take power or else they will take power and kill you, so it’s nothing new that Turks did this doesn’t take them out of the fold of Islam. Best example when a Muslims kills someone unjustly Muslims or non Muslim he has committed a sin and god would judge them on the day of judgment
Pappu-e Aurangfatizeb😂😂😂
Mohammed bin tughlaq was famous for his failed expedition but on good note he was the only sultan who was most tolerent , he thinks for his people but he was not well versed with his time and many historians wrote wrong about him
Some centuries later: mulyono
you call him psychotic sultan but honestly name one muslim leader who isn't. the sentence is very vague XDXD. Its valid to all muslim kings
Devgiri aahe
Modi 😂
Ambani trying to change history 😂
जी नहीं। मोदी जी बहुत बड़े scientist हैं।
My beloved city ❣️ Aurangabad ❣️
😮 sambhaji nagar 😂😂
chatrapati shamabaji nagar
@@Dheeraj-y4fSambha bohoti Zalim Shasha tha
@@Dheeraj-y4f Sambha bohoti Zalim Shashak tha.
@@shahenshahkhurram711esa kya kr diya tha muslimo ko mara tha kya
Now we have MODI BIN TUGLAK and AMIT SHAH ABDALI.😮
Good good ye daar acha hai 😂😂
Ghiyasuddin took the title of "slayers of infidels" bkl Tughlaqabad ki MKB
Krishnadeva raya gets the title "destroyer of turks"
Nice agenda 😂
It's History Not Propoganda.
And This person was the Reason For Expansion of Islam In India.
He was a leader a hero a legend. He wanted to save the population from mongol massacre. the mongols had conquered the whole planet all upto hungry and only Tughlaq State was opposing them at that time in Asia
his father was a mongol
@@Dheeraj-y4f but Tughlaqs were Civilized and Islamic Mongols, not the Barbaric one
He is a genius plz up grade your knowledge don't spread wrong information
The actor playing Tugy looks so goofy...
Why tuglak looking like indian
Actor yaha ka hai.
This guy has been reincarnated as ex CM of AP Y.S Jagan Mohan Reddy..same mannerisms