How Powering with Atmospheric Electricity Works

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 พ.ย. 2015
  • How atmospheric electricity works to generate electricity to power things, like a corona motor, an electrostatic motor.
    Support RimstarOrg on Patreon www.patreon.com/user?u=680159
    Subscribe for new videos every week th-cam.com/users/rimstaror...
    Go to the main channel page here / rimstarorg
    See also:
    Atmospheric Electricity Powering a Corona Motor/Electrostatic Motor
    • Atmospheric Electricit...
    How to Make Corona Motor (v2) aka Electrostatic Motor/Atmospheric Motor
    • How to Make Corona Mot...
    Generate Electricity with Peltier Module - The Seebeck Effect
    • Generate Electricity w...
    More about powering using atmospheric electricity can be see on my webpage here:
    rimstar.org/science_electronic...
    Source for explanation about atmospheric electricity:
    The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Richard Feynman, vol. 2, section 9
    Caltech, Richard Feynman's old stomping ground, has been nice enough to put the lectures online for free! Here's a link to section 9 www.feynmanlectures.caltech.ed...
    3D modelling and animation done using Blender 2.71.
    Follow behind-the-scenes on:
    Twitter #!/RimStarz
    Google+ plus.google.com/1163951251362...
    Facebook / rimstarorg
    rimstar.org
    A Darker Heart - music by audionautix.com
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 3.6K

  • @vector8310
    @vector8310 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    This is what TH-cam is mainly about for me. Clear and illuminating exposition of fundamental facts of our universe.

  • @godfreypoon5148
    @godfreypoon5148 6 ปีที่แล้ว +749

    If you do this during a thunderstorm, there is sometimes enough current to directly drive a loudspeaker to quite audible volume. The sounds are very interesting indeed, but there is some risk of violent equipment damage and injury.
    I found, leading up to a lightning strike, there is a clicking sound that progressively increases in frequency until it becomes a very loud shrieking sound, at which point the lightning strikes, and a "fart" noise is made for a few seconds. Then the process repeats.

    • @nathansmith3608
      @nathansmith3608 6 ปีที่แล้ว +63

      Godfrey Poon video next time plz!

    • @godfreypoon5148
      @godfreypoon5148 6 ปีที่แล้ว +63

      +Nathan Smith That's a good idea, I might finally get some views on my channel hahaha.

    • @mike7546
      @mike7546 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      pls reply if u olredy have video :)

    • @mosttriumphantvideos
      @mosttriumphantvideos 6 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      Fart theory

    • @TonySmith-dd8is
      @TonySmith-dd8is 6 ปีที่แล้ว +53

      See my comment above and Plauson patent ! He generated 17KW , yes 17,000 watts from a 300 foot balloon in 1922 ! And people are bragging about a few watts ?
      US Patent # 1,540,998 Conversion of Atmospheric Electric Energy
      A long expired 1922 patent so anyone can use it !
      It would be easy to work around lightning. See above. And we now have weather RADAR to know it is coming hours before it hits !

  • @user-ny2jp6pl4n
    @user-ny2jp6pl4n 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +85

    Biologist here that has always struggled with physics. This is an easy to understand take on this wild concept!

    • @chehystpewpur4754
      @chehystpewpur4754 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      look into how spiders fly. its a very same principle and may be more your style per say?

    • @chofongnestor8888
      @chofongnestor8888 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Please can you do a video on microsonic energy

    • @kingjames7273
      @kingjames7273 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      We struggle with physics brother because they inserted lies with truths thus the term half truths..

    • @slimboiu3890
      @slimboiu3890 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      honestly bro when i was in school for engineering, my physics prof explained density to us and to me it seemed like gravity was not even real, density can account for most everything that we typically think of "falling" to the ground. and now combine this idea with everything has electric charges and it makes even more sense!@@kingjames7273

  • @ThatJay283
    @ThatJay283 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    tbh i was totally expecting some clickbaity video with bad music and someone either using a giant copper wire in the sky to charge their phone or power an led to demonstrate "free energy", but i was pleasently surprised. this is very cool! :)

    • @bryanb5895
      @bryanb5895 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      The music was very annoying though. lol

    • @kennethgee2004
      @kennethgee2004 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      this still looks like free energy to me they just caveated it that it is not a lot of power

  • @christophermartin8366
    @christophermartin8366 3 ปีที่แล้ว +160

    Good vid. Simple, well illustrated and very informative. And very important there was NO WASTED time just concise and to the point.

  • @PhazonSouffle
    @PhazonSouffle 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1228

    I thought this was going to be one of those free energy pseudo science videos but I learned some interesting physics instead.

    • @peterburton3095
      @peterburton3095 4 ปีที่แล้ว +197

      Newsflash: they're one and the same. Free energy machines get their energy from either the atmosphere, magnets, gravity, centrifugal force etc. Lookup Thomas Henry Moray. He demonstrated that he could produce up to 50 kilowatts from an aerial just 2.5 metres from the ground (17m horizontally). He was shot at in his car so he put bullet proof glass on his car but they eventually shot him at his lab. Many other inventors have been silenced too. If you really want to learn science then i advise you to turn the idiot box off as they're lying to you. Don't believe me? Look at who owns most of the world's media...

    • @peterburton3095
      @peterburton3095 4 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      @couchpotato take a look at Dr Thomas Valone testify about his work at the patent office. He talks about how the office is extremely corrupt and any invention that can be weaponised can be stolen and patent not granted to the owner. The same applies for any alternative energy device. He states that over 5000 inventions have been stolen from the inventors and hidden from the public.
      I've seen many devices working, accepting load and providing over unity.

    • @sklepa
      @sklepa 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@peterburton3095 Look Son! an idiot!

    • @mephiz1919
      @mephiz1919 3 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      @@sklepa You're too harsh on him buddy! You need to be more harsh on yourself!

    • @JonnyDeRico
      @JonnyDeRico 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @Jack Saami there are produced by human kind in the first place, so there is no free energy.

  • @bitcoinzoomer9994
    @bitcoinzoomer9994 ปีที่แล้ว +212

    I feel like atmospheric energy has so much unexplored potential.

    • @fidelcatsro6948
      @fidelcatsro6948 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      sounds like free energy there waiting for the taking ..🐱👍🏿

    • @novisadmojgrad
      @novisadmojgrad ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And it was used, but during last ~200 years we are indoctrinated into using fossil fuels and other materials. Do you know what J.P. Morgan said to Tesla when he introduced machine/coil for producing free electricity from ether? He said: "We will not let mass adoption of your invention, because then we couldn't sell anything to the masses"(oil, energy,..)!

    • @mitchelldyer5415
      @mitchelldyer5415 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      heh...untapped potential

    • @Darkstar9827
      @Darkstar9827 ปีที่แล้ว

      They will never allow us to use it. Once they find out or you're dumb enough to make it known they'll take you out. No doubt.

    • @michelwagenaar
      @michelwagenaar ปีที่แล้ว

      Its a smart explanation if you want to explain everything with made up knowledge by the puppet masters

  • @patch7809
    @patch7809 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for the concise nature of the presentation. Kept me interested on the matter instead of skipping through

  • @fCauneau
    @fCauneau 6 ปีที่แล้ว +81

    Very interesting !! Nice job !!
    And no Physical concept was harmed during this footage ;-)

    • @dannyg41
      @dannyg41 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No Gator was harmed in the making of this photo (Instagram) hit ya'll hard 🤣

  • @drkastenbrot
    @drkastenbrot 8 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    Your videos are unique on the internet. They explain things nobody else does videos about. Also they are very well made and really help understanding the physics behind stuff.

  • @trueriver1950
    @trueriver1950 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Kudos for citing Feynman. Not only was he an excellent physicist (in my opinion even surpassing Einstein) but also was an amazing teacher. I recommend those books you pulled off the shelf

    • @neal-stewart834
      @neal-stewart834 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      einstein was a fraud !!!

  • @pj-vu3cn
    @pj-vu3cn 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    That was the best explanation for atmospheric electricity generation. Thanks!

  • @MikeGFY
    @MikeGFY 5 ปีที่แล้ว +384

    Great video! I was not aware of different voltages as you ascend into the atmosphere.

    • @GeoSciful
      @GeoSciful 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      But unfortunatelly the current being drawn is very small (a few microamps at most).

    • @chehystpewpur4754
      @chehystpewpur4754 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      its the same effect that spiders use to fly. its not wind that they catch with their web. its the static charge in the atmosphere

    • @cjbartoz
      @cjbartoz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@GeoSciful Jules Guillot and Hermann Plauson proved that we can generate industrial levels of power from atmospheric ES energy.

    • @raymondflagstaff2919
      @raymondflagstaff2919 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cjbartoz and what happens when we equalize the potentials after we stop the wind and ocean currents?

    • @hydrogen-power-gas
      @hydrogen-power-gas 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GeoSciful except if you no need current and only volts as voltage does work too

  • @USWaterRockets
    @USWaterRockets 8 ปีที่แล้ว +194

    Well done! This is the best presentation on this experiment that I have ever seen. Really nice job!

    • @saskiavanhoutert3190
      @saskiavanhoutert3190 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes it's realistic I agree with that and your opinion.

  • @x62104
    @x62104 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Appreciate your time and sharing the knowledge 🙏🏼👍🏼🙏🏼

  • @danielbtwd
    @danielbtwd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    I read somewhere that during the early days most of the North American telegraph system was powered by earth batteries. Nicoli Tesla had some great designs regarding this subject. Nice video thanks.

    • @vylbird8014
      @vylbird8014 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yes, but there's a lot of mythology around earth batteries. They are really just electrochemical cells - the electrodes are very slowly consumed. Just that the electrodes are bloody huge, so they can last a long time. Under some circumstances you can tap into telluric currents, but even those are pretty weak. The only time I know when a telegraph ran entirely off of induced power like that was under the very exceptional circumstances of 1859.

    • @Aereto
      @Aereto 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Though self-powering radio receivers are much more practical in emergencies by taking advantage of the electromagnetic nature of radio waves to stimulate just enough to produce sound.

  • @neilregan2488
    @neilregan2488 5 ปีที่แล้ว +77

    I've always wanted to run a similar experiment for myself using a balloon, but I was too lazy. Thankyou for doing it and sharing your data. I was surprised by how little the amperage was.

    • @omnianti0
      @omnianti0 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      i guess even a ballon and more a drone is inducing too by itself more than micro amps so how to quantify the flaw ?

    • @christianmeier4924
      @christianmeier4924 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Me too, and I got quite some ideas about it long back!

    • @michealnelson5179
      @michealnelson5179 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was thinking balloon, with the 6 spike array described. Then it uses no power itself. Except for possible RC stabilizer controls if we go full derigible...

    • @1SqueakyWheel
      @1SqueakyWheel ปีที่แล้ว

      The longer the line to the upper probe, the larger the balloon would be required to lift its weight before the ceiling of diminishing returns is reached on lift due to thinning atmospheric density.
      A dirigible would certainly be appropriate here.

    • @hernerweisenberg7052
      @hernerweisenberg7052 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@1SqueakyWheel I bet if you have that wire attatched to a spool that turns a generator and have the airship pull it up, that single action would produce more electricity then the antenna would in a year :D

  • @GenericGerman
    @GenericGerman 8 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Thx for still making these videos! You´re an awesome teacher!

    • @fidelcatsro6948
      @fidelcatsro6948 ปีที่แล้ว

      i read this comment 7years later..

  • @poldoford
    @poldoford ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I've heard about this potential in the air at my uniwersity. But nobody explainet me this like you. Great job!

    • @CosmicSeeker69
      @CosmicSeeker69 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's bc academia doesn't want you to know about the incredible truths that have been suppressed.

  • @jons2447
    @jons2447 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Thank you, Steve!
    I love this, it helps me think of ways to use the info.
    Twin-lead cable could be mounted on a pole, insulated from ground, & be a collector.
    If connected to capacitors it may collect enough current for 'practical' uses.
    Have a GREAT day, Neighbor!

    • @raygodwin3496
      @raygodwin3496 ปีที่แล้ว

      Use highly conductive metals and mold them into shapes at the very top of that create a vibratory rate that attracts the positive ions and you could power a whole city. The ancients did it. A lot of sacred shapes in occult knowledge produce vibrations that are very advantageous to producing a desired result. This is all ancient wisdom. The robber Barrons profit from the suppression of this knowledge and literally hijacked and reshaped our education system to create obedient and predictable workers rather than critical thinkers. They themselves have been quoted saying exactly that. If you really look and pay attention you can find mountains of evidence that the history we have been taught is almost completely made up and we are in an age that pales in comparison to the ancient societies long forgotten by design.

  • @sketchyssk8shop
    @sketchyssk8shop 8 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    well done. enjoy your animations. makes it easier to follow you

  • @timothyhaug2060
    @timothyhaug2060 6 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    2 things
    1) the atmo motor runs on difference of energy potential that creates pressure. If you sink your ground deeper, say 12 meters or so, you wind up with better current flow(amps).
    2) you can utilize an atmo motor as it's own prime mover. This is easily accomplished by using 2 tesla bifilar pancake coils and permanent magnet (i would use an n35 or better). Place the magnet in between the 2 coils. The coil furthest from the motor and closest to the north pole of the magnet is connected to your ariel. The output of the coil is connected to the input of the coil on the south side of the magnet.

  • @shapiemau2244
    @shapiemau2244 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brilliant and well presented video. Thank you.

  • @jordanclarke2996
    @jordanclarke2996 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video, That explains all the arcing I was getting from my coax long wire in the rain :)

  • @SardiPax
    @SardiPax 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Really great and clear explanation, well done.

  • @JoeJoeTater
    @JoeJoeTater 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Awesome! I clearly should not have dismissed the earlier chapters in the FLoP. I had no idea there was such a large potential gradient in the atmosphere.

  • @King-gr3zv
    @King-gr3zv 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing quality production !

  • @Egzoset
    @Egzoset 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    As a young boy i once had a very long wire meant to be used as an antenna which happened to generate short blue sparks during high winds, so there was high voltage indeed but all it could have been useful for might have been to ignite a butane fire the way piezo-electric lighters do... It was already close to a hundred feet long i think, so i can't imagine what sort of network one would require just to power some toy motor! But the bright side is that this may double as a humidity trap generating clear water as well.

    • @dogodogo5891
      @dogodogo5891 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      how could yoou make such an antenna? is it prone to lightning? actually i am interested in doing experiment on attract lightning LOL

    • @manjichromagnon5480
      @manjichromagnon5480 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Use a balloon

    • @fidelcatsro6948
      @fidelcatsro6948 ปีที่แล้ว

      if u had a hundred of those in the sky it might produce more usable amps

  • @killer33334
    @killer33334 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    great video excellent job! thank you very much for all the work you put in to your videos

  • @indykoning
    @indykoning 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    amazing animation for the explanation

  • @robertonavarro1965
    @robertonavarro1965 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Congratulations! your video explaing the atmosferical potential voltages very well.

  • @thelifeofdrae16
    @thelifeofdrae16 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow! Nice video! I knew this worked but never had someone explain it to me. Thanks, 😉

  • @odissey2
    @odissey2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    One way to "pierce" the equipotential lines is to use some radioactive emitter at the end of the wire (instead of needles). Typically, a small alpha-emitter pill can be used. The simplest is to take out Am source from the common smoke detector.

    • @cassandra2860
      @cassandra2860 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      The best alpha sources are Po-210 sources for anti static brushes.
      Use caution with radioactive things, especially when salvaging them from smork alams.

    • @odissey2
      @odissey2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@cassandra2860 Po-210 half-time is only 138 days! I doubt one can find a "used" antistatic brush with Po-210 source.

    • @cassandra2860
      @cassandra2860 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@odissey2 yeah, that's the downside. Upside is that they're up to 100 μCi per unit. You do still have to buy them new, but they're still pretty good for a while.

    • @odissey2
      @odissey2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@cassandra2860 100uCi is a lot. I once had a Na-23 (e+) source in a size of a grain, ~20-40uCi. It burned a hole in a scintillator plastic pill in about 3 months.

    • @D-Vinko
      @D-Vinko ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Like a fire.
      A fire would probably work too.

  • @yapandasoftware
    @yapandasoftware 6 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    When I was younger, I worked in a helicopter crew. The Huges 500 would carry a cable about 100 ft long which carried a basket. That cable would gather energy between drops so we had to let the cable end touch the ground to neutralize. If we didn't.. we'd get knocked on our buts with so much energy it made you see stars.. The twin rotor Sikorsky would blow your shoes off.

    • @suzannehartmann946
      @suzannehartmann946 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      YEP

    • @superchuck3259
      @superchuck3259 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Static charge is more than this effect, but it still is a big deal to get jolted. Always ground out.

    • @d0u6la5m
      @d0u6la5m 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      this is static charge similar to attaching a 1-1/4 pvc conduit to the nozzle of a shop vac to extend the range, so that you can suck up concrete dust while drilling overhead, and then getting shocked by touching it.

  • @mosess880
    @mosess880 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for sharing your work Sir...

  • @cihanaltinel1014
    @cihanaltinel1014 ปีที่แล้ว

    A really smooth explanation

  • @opshacom1
    @opshacom1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Very interesting...will this call closer to surrounding lightning or simulate deforming possitively charged clouds?

  • @Pillowcase
    @Pillowcase 8 ปีที่แล้ว +147

    The 3d work is very well done.

  • @bluedeckelectronics
    @bluedeckelectronics 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for the video !

  • @bigtexuntex7825
    @bigtexuntex7825 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I tried to capture this energy 50 years ago when I was a kid, but I didn't have the equipment to even detect if I was doing anything, and I certainly didn't have a way to run the wire that high. Thanks for the demonstration!

  • @antilogism
    @antilogism 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's funny TH-cam suggested this to me. I became interested in the atmospheric potential gradient in the late 1980's when I realized I could light a neon bulb from a TV antenna. In 1992 I set up an electrometer, roughly based on an article in the June 1949 edition of Weatherwise (my photocopy was still in my files!). Thunderstorms over a hundred miles away could be detected and inside about 30 miles the old Radio Shack multimeter would slam the pegs and I'd have to go outside and disconnect. Running an ion motor is a fun way to see this in action! I wonder if it will drive an ion pinwheel too?
    It's interesting, and a bit sad, that people today still think physics is "magic", "secret science" or stitch it into some paranoid belief. Thanks for sharing this solid demonstration!

    • @superchuck3259
      @superchuck3259 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Fun was the crystal radio set that could listen to the radio without a battery.
      Just the radio waves were enough to power the little ear bud from it.
      Radio Shack really helped young aspiring engineers and scientists.
      Real science, not this make believe stuff of today. Also the people that believe the make believe, they think this is "magic" and "secret". Same morons that think a male dog can get pregnant and have puppies.

    • @antilogism
      @antilogism 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@superchuck3259 Yes! Many interesting variations too. Germanium diodes or "cats whiskers" on galena, copper oxide of pennies or blue razor blades. Regen sets are fun too. I like that these little projects are so approachable and tangible. Right up there with sprouting seeds and growing sugar crystals.

  • @DIYExperiments
    @DIYExperiments 7 ปีที่แล้ว +81

    Great ! Very very very interesting :o

    • @zetacon4
      @zetacon4 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Not yet. Harness this potential energy and make it do useful work. Then! It will become interesting.

    • @iliasvor2728
      @iliasvor2728 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      0

  • @tcekic2323
    @tcekic2323 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is awesome thank you!

  • @sordidknifeparty
    @sordidknifeparty ปีที่แล้ว

    This was really cool, thanks!

  • @alyssaann9548
    @alyssaann9548 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Makes me ponder the pryminds with the atmospheric electric so many wonders found, love it!!

    • @letlhogonolokebasitile6924
      @letlhogonolokebasitile6924 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm thinking the same. Capture the electricity by using a conductor over a large area. Then the tip would be an even greater conductor that would also be smaller in cross section thus increasing EM flux. Voila! The size of your electrostatic motor will determine how fast it RPMs

    • @memecoinmafia2732
      @memecoinmafia2732 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@letlhogonolokebasitile6924 Flux capacitors

  • @kitkat2407
    @kitkat2407 5 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    I was sceptical at first and thought oh man another free energy crap. But you've explained it really good. It is sad that the total Energy Output is so Low.

    • @juicyblunts
      @juicyblunts 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @Plasma Matter Loser.

    • @brefavre4
      @brefavre4 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Video cruzer Maxwell was godlike

    • @rufusleers
      @rufusleers 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's only low output unless you add a spark gap to ground cable.

    • @ShreddedSteel
      @ShreddedSteel 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Video cruzer No ofc not.... Because other People took His Work. Be proud of Your Government, Peasant.

    • @Supernumerary
      @Supernumerary 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Devin- From the FWIW department, have you heard rumors that only ~70% of Maxwell’s work is public domain? The remaining 70% explains things such as energy from the ether or zero point energy. Hence, the energy that maintains the perpetual electrical charge within atoms.

  • @neoferatus
    @neoferatus 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    WooooooooooooW!!!! Its amazing!!! Thanks for your videos!! Now make another video of how extrac energy from the plants :D

  • @khashayarmodaberi4958
    @khashayarmodaberi4958 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    WOW this is a huge science!!! Thank you very much ❤️ God bless you🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

  • @zzjimmai59
    @zzjimmai59 5 ปีที่แล้ว +185

    That reminds me of Nicholas Tesla tower and free energy for all.

    • @okan3644
      @okan3644 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      😂😂😂😂

    • @zoranlatki9717
      @zoranlatki9717 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Yes it was his idea and he did it in experiments , free elektricity without wires for all plane ship automobiles....

    • @mkvk74
      @mkvk74 5 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      Tesla's thing was getting energy transported through air, not getting it from the air.

    • @zzjimmai59
      @zzjimmai59 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      mkvk74 that’s why I choose the word remind..

    • @razsigrun3105
      @razsigrun3105 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@zzjimmai59 But would it make a difference if every single building had many of these (i wanna say lightening rods) energy vanes? If the point attracts positive, then many points within close proximity to each other attract more? Making more power?
      Does that make any sense? I am just reminded of how ubiquitous lightening rods used to be, but have fallen out of use due to the fact that they don't really work. I am also reminded of the design of Gothic cathedrals. All of those points, completely covering the building. The building itself is a giant point. I wonder!
      Notre Dame Cathedral c8.alamy.com/comp/F688FT/rear-back-overcast-skies-flying-buttresses-notre-dame-cathedral-paris-F688FT.jpg
      Cologne Cathedralmygermanyblog.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/catherdral1.jpg?w=0&h=0&crop=1
      Milan Cathedral media.architecturaldigest.com/photos/585abd68015f22236a2c5334/master/w_1600%2Cc_limit/gothic-cathedrals-08.jpg

  • @uruiamnot
    @uruiamnot 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Then I propose a new application for this. On a TV or radio transmission tower, insulate the top 50 feet of it so that its potential can become the same as the surrounding air. The lower portion will remain at ground potential. Now, you connect the two through a power supply that can charge a battery and run an LED light to blink for navigation purposes. You simply disconnect the circuit automatically whenever there is a disruption (like a storm) and use the battery.

    • @d0u6la5m
      @d0u6la5m 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      i like this idea but the top half should be a galvanically positive metal and the bottom half should be galvanically negative metal and the top and bottom half should be separated by an insulator and the whole thing should be a giant capacitor.

    • @7792448
      @7792448 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@d0u6la5m Doug I would love to have your input on just how you would make it a giant capacitor.Is that what I am currently looking at a Lawrence Rayburn TREC version of this with successive coils within coils a 10-in, 8-in biff, 6-in, 4-in biff All at 24-in in length concentric to each other. This is connected 30 to 75 ft tower, with a biff pancake coil at the top and a match at the bottom as per- plan to be at one foot off the ground.

    • @stargazer7644
      @stargazer7644 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's like thinking you've come up with a scheme that will allow an ant to pull a freight train.

  • @rome8726
    @rome8726 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fascinating !

  • @mikerupe1642
    @mikerupe1642 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is what telsa's wardenclyffe tower im so surprised i had never seem this video just a minute in and i know its amazing thank you

  • @pkillor
    @pkillor 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very instructive video ... Thanks.
    So to collect more ionic charge +, is it necessary to have more pointy surfaces? ...
    If I remember correctly, there is a laboratory in the UK that makes "carbon nanotube forests", called vantablack on aluminum surface.
    They present them as the blackest known object, because
    the reflection of light on that object is almost null ...
    There are videos that show this device.
    I think it would be a good candidate to be used in Zepelines
    or helium balloons to take them to the highest height and collect loads ..

    • @blue5697
      @blue5697 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      look at cathedrals (cathodes) they have a lot of pointy surfaces

  • @mortyrickerson6322
    @mortyrickerson6322 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Im almost crying because im so happy to find this channel. Very rare to find good knowledge on this platform so im always grateful when coming across true passion. Cheers and thank you again for sharing

    • @fidelcatsro6948
      @fidelcatsro6948 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      dont cry amigo.. offers some kleenex tissue👍🏿

  • @stevenhite9684
    @stevenhite9684 ปีที่แล้ว

    I knew about it but only loosely I've never seen it applied thank you I love to learn stuff as I age

  • @sangkang6294
    @sangkang6294 ปีที่แล้ว

    You learn something new everyday.

  • @Zork13
    @Zork13 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Could you try to use a rotary spark gap, hand powered or otherwise, to create a pulsed DC waveform on your line, then transform it to a useable voltage? If you get 12kv at 1uA from your setup, you could transform it to 12v 1mA. Send up multiple lines in parellel to multiple insulated poles, you could achieve a useable current.

    • @thirstyviaduct
      @thirstyviaduct ปีที่แล้ว

      More than enough to charge a cell phone right?

  • @Davepping
    @Davepping 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Great experiment. Thanks for doing this. When I saw this it crossed my mind that since current is proportional to mass of the conductor why not just use thicker gauge copper wire to get more current out? Also having more conductor surface area at the highest point. You should try flying 2 quad copters(drones) 100 ft apart and have them carry a copper wire (suspended between them) up the same distance. Have the conducting lead to ground extend from the middle of the suspended copper wire.

    • @masterhutchgaming1566
      @masterhutchgaming1566 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      You are on the right track. Well done! Gauge and surface area are the main systems as to providing proper amounts from the atmosphere. That was how Wardenclyff was designed. Nobody alive today truly knows how it was designed nor for what, only speculation and hypothesis based upon what his enemies told everyone. Edison spent how long trying to discredit Tesla's AC, and everyone only hears about Edison in school, and people believe the misinformation spread by the same people like Edison. Edison literally electrocuted how many animals and even invented the electric chair used for killing off of the worse of the worse, and people really think those guys didn't spread disinformation about Tesla and his designs. Such feeble minds, Kudos on actually understanding how the design works and is needed to be implemented. Yet we do have photos of the mass amounts of electricity and current that was generated within Wardenclyff.

    • @andrewwalsh3744
      @andrewwalsh3744 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It's really done by putting a battery between the earth and the top of the wire which then charges the differential greater than the atmospherics. Castles, Starforts, and the Pyramids all used this method. The problem was it was DC. A big problem if you have a volcanic eruption! Very dangerous.

    • @shanli2693
      @shanli2693 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Interesting

    • @IonidisIX
      @IonidisIX ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@andrewwalsh3744 if you don't mind mate I would like more info on this. Please point me to a book or yt video. :)

    • @andrewwalsh3744
      @andrewwalsh3744 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@IonidisIX JPMorgan bankrupted Tesla is documented. Tesla as with the Pyramids produced a potential voltage difference by differing methods but Teslas was AC and the Pyramids was DC using water pressure from the Nile. Tesla's was a motor/coil but was perfect and free energy. Unfortunately the DC method caused what is refered to as the Mudflood generated by the castles and prior the Starfort's. The mudflood was created due to the DC attracting the Iron ash being attracted to the cities in the Northern hemisphere. A VEI 7 was recorded in I think 1808 in Greenland. This killed 90% of the pop. This was when children were sent to Austraila/Railway children. Led to the 1812 overtures and 1815 waterloo and the year with no summer, 1816. I spent a couple of hundred hours researching this but, the Batteries of Castles was just that, as are starforts. The triad of metals is relevant. It even goes back to Silver and Tea trade in the 1750s with India and East India shipping. Further led to the UK Aristocracy and Silver Teasets/India loves Gold and the English Tea. But I was just learning about Electricity and dug all this out.

  • @peace4peaceful
    @peace4peaceful 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cool video, wasy to understand and follow. Do you plan on making one on electroculture?
    I am just looking into electroculture myself. A lot of what i have found so far lacks information.
    Thanks for the video. I will be looking at more from your channel.

  • @Noteven0
    @Noteven0 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Outstanding experiment, very fascinating!
    Could the hexacopter’s own electrostatic buildup influence the charge being received through the corona wire collector?
    Have you tried using a balloon to lift the wire to the desired altitude?

  • @stanislausbrown8626
    @stanislausbrown8626 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Thank you for sharing this! I totally didn't know about atmospheric electricity. I guess I thought electricity in the air only happened with lightning, but here you're saying that it's there all the time. Wow! that's amazing.
    So, can you accumulate this electricity and store in a battery or something? That would be great.

    • @BrianSu
      @BrianSu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Yes of course you could but there is so little energy to extract using this process that it won’t do much good

    • @Hellsong89
      @Hellsong89 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Few problems with that. Voltage is highish but amperage is in picoamps note that pico is one of the smallest scales. 1milliamp is 0.001amps and picoamp is 0.000 000 000 000 1amps so actual energy capacity is ridiculously low. Other issues comes on building tall enough structure that can support this. Radio and tv towers are around 150-200 meters tall with one exception being higher far as i know. To get enough voltage that can be converted to amperage you would need structure that is so tall that material science becomes issue on it self, even before you take into count weather issues like gale strong winds and thunder storms that would love nothing more than conductor like that.
      it would be far better to find solutions to collect thunder strike energy, but that is way too much power compared to what we have around and no suitable storage methods since thunder storms are far and between, stable energy production this way is not practical at all, even if its essentially free. Any systems that would be connected to that huge ass lightning rod would fry instant it got hit, so no not really you cannot use this to produce power in scale it was any use except as science experiment.

    • @baptistek1917
      @baptistek1917 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      ​@@Hellsong89 People before 1850 collected electricity as shown in the video. Cathedrals (as the name indicates) and almost every monuments collected atmospheric electricity. And people had a lot of free energy to do anything they wanted : just look at the number of lighbulbs they used at the so-called world fairs. The walls themselves were electric, they did not use cables like it is now.

    • @hurrdurrmurrgurr
      @hurrdurrmurrgurr ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Hellsong89 So if I understand you right:
      Step 1: Invent process to mass produce graphene
      Step 2: Create space Elevator
      Step 3: Power a lightbulb

    • @louyah777
      @louyah777 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The old buildings used red brick constructions as power houses, painting them also assisted keeping moisture. This is often seen as red and white stripes - much like we see on power plants still today. The building geometry allowed them to control flow. There's even footage of moving footpaths, they were more advanced than we are lead to believe.

  • @idontknowyouthatsmypurse
    @idontknowyouthatsmypurse หลายเดือนก่อน

    Your comment just gave me an idea for an invention, but unfortunately I lack the electrical engineering knowledge and machining ability to make a physical mock-up of it.
    I have zero background in electrical or mechanical engineering, but I tend to “invent” things because I am well above average in *theoretical* thinking and absolutely LIVE for dreaming of novel ways to apply proven concepts.
    I don’t know your story, but your comment makes me think we could team up to make some of my ideas come to life :)

  • @mariuszgabrys7144
    @mariuszgabrys7144 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing is that, what you just showed. Keep passing the knowledge. Let it flow

  • @justinkirk7260
    @justinkirk7260 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This is a great video. I'm sure you've been asked this before but I can't find anyone asking it in the comments. How much of a load or how much torque do you think the shaft of the electrostatic motor could handle with this setup?

    • @RimstarOrg
      @RimstarOrg  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      There's not much torque. A light touch with my finger on the motor shaft stopped it.

    • @michealnelson5179
      @michealnelson5179 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@RimstarOrg cool experiment, but how to we turn it to useful work?

    • @fidelcatsro6948
      @fidelcatsro6948 ปีที่แล้ว

      we can improve the torque with more leaves..i saw a video of a man using a corona motor shaft coupled to a dc motor used as a generator lighting up several led lamps

    • @stargazer7644
      @stargazer7644 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@michealnelson5179You can't. The amount of power available is extremely tiny.

  • @int16_t
    @int16_t 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    3:08 I dont know if your using the coventional current flow or electron current flow.

  • @kyliepine3713
    @kyliepine3713 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video, thanks

  • @wiciuwiciu2783
    @wiciuwiciu2783 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice! How many and how hihg wires would You need to power up something?
    Does skyscrapers electronics have to deal with this?

  • @yurinovojenov6310
    @yurinovojenov6310 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Спасибо.У вас очень интересные видео.Я поднимал змей KITE на тонкой проволке использовал как антенну и тоже делал электрические опыты.но многое было непонятно.Вы очень хорошо обьясняете.Спасибо.

    • @valerijskarseko1014
      @valerijskarseko1014 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Я не электрик но если просто изолировать воздушный кабель от земли то это должно сработать.

    • @fidelcatsro6948
      @fidelcatsro6948 ปีที่แล้ว

      yes this man explanation was better than Ben Franklins kite experiments!

  • @OtterLakeFlutes
    @OtterLakeFlutes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Makes me think of the STS-75 mission with the tether that broke. Do you have any thoughts about the data they did get and/or also: do you think they just underestimated the strain or could some kind of electromagnetic affect (almost like a signal node) could have had an effect on material integrity at that spot where it broke? Sorry, you may have no interest in the shuttle mission but reading electrical fields in the atmosphere had me thinking of it (even though that was LEO or something).

    • @RimstarOrg
      @RimstarOrg  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks. I recall reading about it a long time ago, though I don't remember the details. It was an interesting experiment.

    • @memecoinmafia2732
      @memecoinmafia2732 ปีที่แล้ว

      i heard it drew too much power a blew off

  • @abrenos3744
    @abrenos3744 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    great explanation

  • @jimmysblacksmithing462
    @jimmysblacksmithing462 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey good day, very nice informative video. It is so nice for someone to use their genius! Thank you for sharing this look forward to more stay well and have a beautiful day. Jim

  • @DEtchells
    @DEtchells 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    This is coming pretty late (5+ years after you posted the video), but I wonder if using thoriated tungsten for the corona spikes at the top might increase the current? They use them for TIG welding, and as I understand it, the very mild radioactivity of the thorium helps with electron emission. I wonder if that might increase the amount of current available in your setup, all else being equal?

    • @RimstarOrg
      @RimstarOrg  3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I've heard the same, that an ionizing radioactive source at the tip helps. I guess ionizing the air makes it more conductive so you can drawing in more current.

    • @ianallen738
      @ianallen738 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Look into Field Emission Guns, of the Schottky type for RT thermionic transmission. It's gonna basically act like your six needles, only with greater efficiency. If you could get the wire high enough, you would a very powerful effect.

    • @UkuraciUsername
      @UkuraciUsername ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Could we put some gear transmission that would make 100 or even 1000 rotations for one rotation of the corona motor?

    • @tapuout101
      @tapuout101 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RimstarOrg I believe it helps the more points you have too. I seen 1 guy send up a metal grid which received more because of the points.

    • @neal-stewart834
      @neal-stewart834 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      rummer has it that mercury was used in the small balls on the tips of old world buildings

  • @pauldharmer
    @pauldharmer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Gives some insight on pyramids, the capstone being the mystery

    • @elaztic
      @elaztic 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      paul harmer good point.

    • @omkr0122
      @omkr0122 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The capstone was made from quartz. Quartz absorbs electric charge.

    • @elaztic
      @elaztic 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      omkr 01 silica and silicone both do. So sand alone absorbs. Even plastic and glass on a lower levels.

    • @omkr0122
      @omkr0122 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      th-cam.com/video/ijdCNMmlhPM/w-d-xo.html Comment By Steven Chiverton in the video - i once held a quartz crystal near a hv arc and the arc shot straight into the quartz like it was a sponge soaking up the hv and because i was holding the quartz at the other end i felt nothing as if the quartz dampening the current or reduced it so much that it felt zero at the end i was holding

    • @lukepappe
      @lukepappe 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      More than the capstone, its the design and how the pyramids emit free energy to whatever ancient technologies the ancient civilisations before the younger dryas possessed. The dynastic Egyptians did not construct the pyramids.

  • @robwalmsley8235
    @robwalmsley8235 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It would be interesting to see in a video how big the system would need to be to do work in the real world....thankyou...that was clear and interesting to watch

  • @yume7z185
    @yume7z185 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video! You should've explained a bit more about why the atmosphere has a voltage

    • @RimstarOrg
      @RimstarOrg  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks! And yeah, but there were too many factors that affected the voltage so that would require a whole other video. Interesting stuff though.

  • @pixels303at-odysee9
    @pixels303at-odysee9 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Capacitive inductance circuitry can buck a high voltage low current to a low voltage high current. Just use a high frequency switching with a high voltage field effect transistor circuit from a capacitor hooked to this. Look up buck converter.

    • @masterhutchgaming1566
      @masterhutchgaming1566 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Don't tell modern scientists that. They are still brainwashed into thinking what you see is what you get and then shown lies and misinformation

    • @mooney6306q
      @mooney6306q 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Don't forget the oscillating phase compensator for the flux capacitor - don't want to overcharge those dilithium crystals now do we! 😂

    • @Israel220500
      @Israel220500 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@masterhutchgaming1566 What the heck are you talking about? What we know about electricity and electrionics is exactly what "modern science" studies. A buck converter is nothing but an electronic device, a transistor which is usually used in this device, wouldn't work if there wasn't quantum mechanics (modern physics). And no, this doesn't violate conservation of energy, as he said, increasing the voltage decreases the current and vice-versa.

    • @masterhutchgaming1566
      @masterhutchgaming1566 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Israel220500 What the heck are you even talking about? How to turn atmospheric energy into viable electrical source has been around since the 1890s and yet still y'all haven't built a single one. So either A. You aren't taught this, or B. Don't give a single fuck about your children and their children nor the planet and just really enjoy having destroyed the planet with every other fuel source but this. But again what are you going on about? Sounds like you have some kind of guilty conscience about misinformation with all that added bullshit in that statement. I never once said I didn't know what a buck converter was, I also didn't mention anything about the law of Conservation of Mass nor Energy. So what the heck are YOU going on about? ROFL

    • @Israel220500
      @Israel220500 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@masterhutchgaming1566 I was just wondering why you said "Don't tell modern scientists that" since the comment was about a buck converter, which is a modern science invention. I mentioned conservation of energy because many people think that raising the voltage is like "creating energy".

  • @RinseKid
    @RinseKid 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    You need to ionize the air around the device creating the negative charge in the atmosphere. Try doing this experiment around a source of running water if you ever get the chance.

    • @rachel_v_k
      @rachel_v_k ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The water is the key element you need to really get this working. Build a tall tower or building next to the water, incorporating the flow of the water into the design of the structure.

    • @CorexYs
      @CorexYs ปีที่แล้ว +2

      So all of those ancient structures they call temples and churches nowadays were actually power plants..?

    • @Dsubbz
      @Dsubbz ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CorexYs yes! They also use Mercury on the ion collectors

    • @fidelcatsro6948
      @fidelcatsro6948 ปีที่แล้ว

      the grounding should be moist with water and adding a pack of salt on the grounding rod and soil should improve things🐱👍🏿

    • @DDOMESSI
      @DDOMESSI ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CorexYs Yes.

  • @demarkustimeo2989
    @demarkustimeo2989 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation! The music was a little distracting with my ADD, though.

  • @smoothmove7566
    @smoothmove7566 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    pretty awesome video dude.

  • @GianniLaschi
    @GianniLaschi 8 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    +RimstarOrg Bravo! Good video explanation

    • @RimstarOrg
      @RimstarOrg  8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Gianni Laschi Thanks!

    • @GianniLaschi
      @GianniLaschi 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +RimstarOrg have you tried charging a HV mica capacitor with it ?

    • @RimstarOrg
      @RimstarOrg  8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Gianni Laschi
      No. All I've done so far is what you see in the videos i.e. running the corona motor. By the time the hexacopter gets to the height, it has only a minute or so of battery left before it has to come back down. With 4 sets of batteries, that's 4 tries per trip. Maybe more experimenting next summer.

    • @GianniLaschi
      @GianniLaschi 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well, let's see next summer :)

    • @TGUlricksen
      @TGUlricksen 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +RimstarOrg Simply use a balloon

  • @ridefast0
    @ridefast0 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great explanation, its a pleasure to see something about electrostatics properly explained (by yourself and by Feynmann). Now all you have to do is figure out how to charge the quad-copter batteries from the antenna (maybe a DC-DC converter) and you can be in energy surplus!

    • @syriansayf
      @syriansayf 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're comparing this guy to Feynman you fucking dumbass?

    • @ridefast0
      @ridefast0 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@syriansayf Ha ha ha. I only mentioned Feynman because RimstarOrg credited Feynman as a reference for the explanation, and he was kind enough to interpret it for us, to save us the trouble of looking it up. Luckily, "dumbass" is something people can estimate for themselves from the quality (or otherwise) of comments made.

  • @isubtothebest6020
    @isubtothebest6020 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do I miss these channels

  • @antonioconeglian7471
    @antonioconeglian7471 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir, thats amazing!

  • @summerland6397
    @summerland6397 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    I told this to my friends a couple of years ago. They thought I was crazy. I was talking about using a car antenna and diode to trickle charge a battery from the air.

    • @FireBeam
      @FireBeam 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It's high voltage, low amperage...
      Pretty sure there is a formula for splitting the difference, lying around here somewhere

    • @FireBeam
      @FireBeam 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Just looked, lowering resistance or increasing voltage a lá Ohms law isn't the silver bullet I was looking for...
      However, a buck converter....

    • @FireBeam
      @FireBeam 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Oh jeez...
      "1 ampere is equal to 1000 milliamps, or 1000000000000 picoampere...."

    • @istvanberta1908
      @istvanberta1908 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bytheway, what, s a trickle charger?

    • @istvanberta1908
      @istvanberta1908 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FireBeam read after my que...

  • @akbarallardfreichmann2938
    @akbarallardfreichmann2938 5 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Maybe a small solar panel at the top could help.

  • @antunesmatias
    @antunesmatias 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing video!!!

  • @andresparrow2971
    @andresparrow2971 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was just thinking alking to my dad about real "green" energy, not this no co2 from cars, but increase co2 from utility plants or the solar panels that are owned by electric companies. I completely forgot about Tesla and his electricity towers. This video also had me ready to grab my old Feynman physics principles and see what other interesting things i might find useful today. Thank you for such a clear and easy to understand or explain to others video.

  • @toddbarnes2866
    @toddbarnes2866 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The pyramids at Giza sure are tall and pointy too.

    • @briank4404
      @briank4404 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      As is every single church ⛪

  • @TheSqoou
    @TheSqoou 8 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Our ancestors had to use balloons to power their electrostatic atmospheric motors. Today we have quad copters.

    • @andrewjenery1783
      @andrewjenery1783 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      And they probably did. The narrator in the clip however, mentions that the amps is very low, but couldn't this be increased with a transformer.

    • @laurencerilling5873
      @laurencerilling5873 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      no

    • @markcrnkovich
      @markcrnkovich 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      +MX6Maximus yes, and it was gold! which is a great conductor of electrons. The base of the pyramids where massive, I think the giant footprint. might help to act as an amplifier? They were also striping electrons from the water flowing at the bottom,the lowest point (ground). how would water act in this situation? Would water be a better conductor of earth then say, dirt? what about having the ground stone be an insulation layer, and not allow the base of the pyramid to be grounded, except for the bottom water layer. Have an insulation layer on the outside of the pyramid and then have a conducting layer sandwich in between. Like a giant insulated wire. what would be the voltage in this scenario? blessings and thanks for the awesome video and knowledge. my brain is full of ideas

    • @WCM1945
      @WCM1945 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      About the same as above.

    • @pedroff_1
      @pedroff_1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Andrew Jenery a transformer would require converting it to AC and rectifying it back again, and the whole process, ignoring the extra loss it'd create, would result in the same, pretty low, amount of power

  • @rashmiranjannayak3251
    @rashmiranjannayak3251 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Intresting & knowledge.

  • @mikeagne5933
    @mikeagne5933 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow, thats super cool

  • @danielquirco1
    @danielquirco1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    When I read the title I thought it was one of those videos about free energy and conspiracies... I was prepared for the worst. But then you named the great Mr Feynman and everything was OK. Great video, here's your like good sir!

    • @ElectricalExistence
      @ElectricalExistence 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      You mean the thief feynman who stole teslas work?

    • @mongol33t
      @mongol33t 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      But lt is free energy and conspiracy.. this is the evidence right here.. your brain is just on stand by xD..

    • @waketfup8864
      @waketfup8864 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are a sheep. You are reluctant to accept these ideas due to your indoctrination since childhood

    • @danielquirco1
      @danielquirco1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@waketfup8864 No, I'm reluctanct to accept these ideas bcs I've bothered to study and understand science. You're the sheep that accept any idea just bcs it sounds nice.

  • @maestroe377
    @maestroe377 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Hello.
    I am in France and I am very interested in "electroculture" in gardening. I made a thunder-type antenna in zinc (top) and copper (pole) in order to capture the positive ions to bring them to the ground and thus generate some 0.480 volts ~
    According to your animation, you explain that it is not the positive ions which descend into the ground but the negative ions which rise to the top of the antenna .... I am lost!
    Can you explain to me then how to generate a low voltage from the air and the ground with electrostatic or ambient electricity ?

    • @aknighttrain
      @aknighttrain 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Electrons flow from Negative to Positive - which is opposite of what most people think, probably due to observing a lightning strike, and you can't really see what's actually happening there. I can't answer your last question, that's above my pay grade!

    • @user-hs9ne9dr9o
      @user-hs9ne9dr9o 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Точняк! Земля минус и плюс вниз идет, не так ли?

    • @elektrikamper9205
      @elektrikamper9205 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Читайте литературу 18 века там даже транваи ехали на атмосферном электричестве...

    • @christianmeier4924
      @christianmeier4924 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Dear, I would like to discuss some ideas which appeared many years back to me in this regard.

    • @officealireza9097
      @officealireza9097 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@aknighttrain As someone else told in the comment the actual DC flow is from negative pole to the positive pole of the current/voltage source. However, for some historical reasons, the symbolic current circulation in electrical circuits was considered in reverse order. Also, the process of neutralizing electrons as explained in the video acts like a pump that sucks more electrons from the ground, hence, creates an electrical current (i.e., movement of electrons) going up the wire. Hope it helps

  • @craigmurrayauthor
    @craigmurrayauthor 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    that was an amazing explanation and like many others, half expecting clickbait but got great scientific explanations! How many/big would you need to generate useful currents or is that even possible?

    • @RimstarOrg
      @RimstarOrg  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks, I'm glad you liked it. I don't know of any formulas, plus the varying atmospheric factors can affect it (humidity, during a storm it actually revereses polarity, ...). But lasersaber had more luck (and property) and managed to power a small generator (motor) th-cam.com/video/3EG-zjqs9xM/w-d-xo.html . More collecting area or sharp points at the top would help.

  • @GibsonReview
    @GibsonReview ปีที่แล้ว

    I like the fact that you didn't tell me to subscribe. Although I did!. Great video.

  • @Galv140577
    @Galv140577 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Quick question: Given the electric dipole moment of water molecules 1.85 D, is it possible that the main reason why clouds stay up is because they rest on the electric field rather than being less dense than the air beneath them?
    I only ask because I know clouds are made of water droplets which are 1600 times more dense than water vapor which makes up about 0.25% of the air at 7000 feet altitude, the water droplets are 800 times more dense than air so 0.25% of the mass of a cloud is 800 times more dense than the air not containing clouds at the exact same altitude, pressure and temperature, which means a cloud should be about twice as dense as the air around it.

    • @finddeniro
      @finddeniro 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      An amazing Planet...Stay tuned..

    • @jamie0
      @jamie0 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      An interesting question for a complex process. One part of the answer is that clouds don't exist in a vacuum, if you allow the pun. A cloud forms at a certain elevation in part due to the ratio of water saturation and ambient temperature. Clouds often have flat bottoms because moist air is rising into an elevation where the temperature is below the dew point, forming the cloud.

  • @mikemotorbike4283
    @mikemotorbike4283 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    So, Tesla did this, only winding the wire in a coil going up about a hundred plus feet in his tower with the ball on top. This made the wire effectively miles long/high. Something about the frequency amplified by this coil made it transmissible. This is like a radio wave, which can be picked up by a crystal radio set and power a speaker. Tesla's Big Coil frequency was receivable by small distant tuned coil which turned it back into power. This could power an airplane motor. Just think, electric airplanes, only without heavy expensive batteries. A hundred years ago. We are trying to do this today with batteries, when the tech exists already for long range wireless transmission of power. Its not that it cannot be done, it can, it just can't be billed to a customer. It would be free.
    You can put a flourescent lamp under a high tension pwer line and it will light up. Same principle. You can harness that energy with a box on the ground, but you would be stealing power and breaking the law.

  • @mareknosek996
    @mareknosek996 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great topic.

  • @ricardocalles140
    @ricardocalles140 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This explanation also explains how atmospheric antennas used in electroculture work.

  • @madtscientist8853
    @madtscientist8853 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You could always put a capacitor in between the ground and Atmosphere Antenna.