This video gets bogged down in the many unquantifiable details which are used, in isolation from one another, to support or oppose mass economic immigration. Unfortunately, it fails to adequately describe the long-term big picture for the host population. The latter is determined by the following two basic facts: (1) Immigrants are both workers AND consumers (so you can't use them to get rid of vacancies as claimed in the UK by Tony Blair and New Labour in 2004 - they lied!). (2) In the long run immigrants or their children integrate after which they behave just like the host population. This means that the effect of immigration in the long run is to increase the population and GDP of the host country relative to what it would have been otherwise but without increasing GDP per capita. In the long run it will not increase the financial well-being of the hosts or solve structural problems in their economy caused by their economic and life-style preferences. There will be some small short term effects which may be net positive due to the initial differences between immigrants and the hosts but these will be continually eroded as immigrants integrate and can only be maintained by bringing in immigrants forever. So, while mass immigration may be fine for relatively uncrowded countries like the US which want to keep increasing their economic clout in the world, it is undesirable for relatively crowded countries like the UK (particularly England) and the Netherlands where the increased population density reduces the quality of life for the host population. Put bluntly: immigrants take up space. Without immigration the UK/NL could have solved their own problems by allowing the market economy to do its work and shift people around to where they are most needed (a lot of journalists would be more usefully employed cleaning toilets, for example, whilst a lot of potentially innovative scientists and engineers have found an easier way of making a living producing innovative new financial products to lead in the next financial crash). And although immigrants may not cause wages to fall much, they prevent them from rising where they need to rise. As for ethnic restaurants they are hardly essential (life is about choices) and we don't need millions of immigrants to have a reasonable supply of those. Finally two messages to the woke brigade: (1) using immigrants to do YOUR dirty work for a minimum wage (if they're lucky) is the modern equivalent of slavery which you're so fond of exposing. (2) since immigrants take up space using them to increase the diversity of the host population decreases the biodiversity in the natural world which the hosts use for recreation.
THIS SESSION IS ALOT OF LIES. BECAUSE U SAY MIGRATION, BUT U DONT SAY NOTHING ABOUT ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. AND THAT'S WHAT IS HAPPENING HERE IN THE U.S.A. SO WHAT IHEAR IS A PACK OF LIES. AND SUGER COATING THE SITUATION.
Re impact on wages: Is there a differential impact on wages depending on skill level i.e. unskilled labour can and will drive down wages where as skilled labour moving into a job market with vacancies has little to no effect? Social Cohesion: Why has the Swedish PM recently declared after acknowledging integration has failed "We are living in parallel societies" .. Sweden and Denmark have now enacted some of toughest immigration laws in the EU. Based on this how do you conclude that "Refugee hosting is not associated with a serious threat to social cohesion"?
This is gonna help me so much in my Geography EXAM!!!!!!🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩😁😅😅😅😅
Dear Melissa ❤
I appreciate how to teach us the best training ❤
Thank you so much
My God or ALLAAH bless you
This really helped me for my assignment!
That's great to hear! Don't forget to also check out the links to readings in the video description 👍
These older videos are so good, Melissa!
Glad you think so!
Thanks this helped me for my assignment it’s worth 100 points!
Glad to help out!
Hi! Greetings from Poland. I had to do an enssay about benefits of migration and this video helped me a lot. ALSO THE READINGS IN DESCRIPTION
Glad it was helpful!
Thank you it was really helpful and this video was shared in the class by my teacher
Dear Prof and my teacher, always proud of you!!! Keep up the good work 🔥🔥
This video gets bogged down in the many unquantifiable details which are used, in isolation from one another, to support or oppose mass economic immigration. Unfortunately, it fails to adequately describe the long-term big picture for the host population. The latter is determined by the following two basic facts: (1) Immigrants are both workers AND consumers (so you can't use them to get rid of vacancies as claimed in the UK by Tony Blair and New Labour in 2004 - they lied!). (2) In the long run immigrants or their children integrate after which they behave just like the host population. This means that the effect of immigration in the long run is to increase the population and GDP of the host country relative to what it would have been otherwise but without increasing GDP per capita. In the long run it will not increase the financial well-being of the hosts or solve structural problems in their economy caused by their economic and life-style preferences. There will be some small short term effects which may be net positive due to the initial differences between immigrants and the hosts but these will be continually eroded as immigrants integrate and can only be maintained by bringing in immigrants forever. So, while mass immigration may be fine for relatively uncrowded countries like the US which want to keep increasing their economic clout in the world, it is undesirable for relatively crowded countries like the UK (particularly England) and the Netherlands where the increased population density reduces the quality of life for the host population. Put bluntly: immigrants take up space. Without immigration the UK/NL could have solved their own problems by allowing the market economy to do its work and shift people around to where they are most needed (a lot of journalists would be more usefully employed cleaning toilets, for example, whilst a lot of potentially innovative scientists and engineers have found an easier way of making a living producing innovative new financial products to lead in the next financial crash). And although immigrants may not cause wages to fall much, they prevent them from rising where they need to rise. As for ethnic restaurants they are hardly essential (life is about choices) and we don't need millions of immigrants to have a reasonable supply of those. Finally two messages to the woke brigade: (1) using immigrants to do YOUR dirty work for a minimum wage (if they're lucky) is the modern equivalent of slavery which you're so fond of exposing. (2) since immigrants take up space using them to increase the diversity of the host population decreases the biodiversity in the natural world which the hosts use for recreation.
School assignment got me here😩
Thanks 👍
No problem!
THIS SESSION IS ALOT OF LIES.
BECAUSE U SAY MIGRATION, BUT U DONT SAY NOTHING ABOUT ILLEGAL
IMMIGRATION. AND THAT'S WHAT IS HAPPENING HERE IN THE U.S.A.
SO WHAT IHEAR IS A PACK OF LIES.
AND SUGER COATING THE SITUATION.
Thank you
Thanks
No problem!
Good Work 👍
Thank you!
Thanks 🙏 you it helped me to make my poster
Glad to hear that!
What are problems encounter in global Migration?
Same here
Re impact on wages: Is there a differential impact on wages depending on skill level i.e. unskilled labour can and will drive down wages where as skilled labour moving into a job market with vacancies has little to no effect?
Social Cohesion: Why has the Swedish PM recently declared after acknowledging integration has failed "We are living in parallel societies" .. Sweden and Denmark have now enacted some of toughest immigration laws in the EU.
Based on this how do you conclude that "Refugee hosting is not associated with a serious threat to social cohesion"?
its a lot helpfull thank you
Glad to hear that!
Dreks Viedeo man versteht nix
They just leech and destroy