Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs) Explained in One Minute: Definition, Risk, Tranches, etc.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ส.ค. 2024
  • Quite a few people who aren't necessarily economists know what Mortgage-Backed Securities are in light of the fact that after the Great Recession, they've received extensive coverage, to the point of becoming (in)famous.
    But Collateralized Debt Obligations or CDOs... less so. Unfortunately, this means that people ended up having a superficial understanding of the entire mortgage debacle at best in light of the fact that if you don't know what Collateralized Debt Obligations are and how they work, you aren't even scratching the proverbial surface.
    To keep it simple, think of Mortgage-Backed Securities as a specific Collateralized Debt Obligation type, where only mortgages are used, as the name suggests. When it comes to CDOs, we are therefore dealing with a broader term that encompasses a wide range of different debt types, from personal loans to corporate debt.
    From definition to specifics, this video explains what CDOs are and how they work. We'll be covering the risk dimension as well, including the tranches those in movies such as The Big Short have tried to explain. Fortunately, as complicated as Collateralized Debt Obligations are, it's not that difficult to wrap your head around how things actually work... if the right economist offers to explain the process ;)

ความคิดเห็น • 79

  • @OneMinuteEconomics
    @OneMinuteEconomics  ปีที่แล้ว +1

    GiganticWebsites.com is a project through which I make it possible for people to build truly gigantic websites (thousands of articles each!) at ridiculously low prices. If you have a great domain you want to turn into an amazing website or an existing site you'd like to upgrade/scale, visit our website or check out the One Minute Economics presentation video below:
    th-cam.com/video/gE8yEOQFMvo/w-d-xo.html
    Please note that this comment is not an ad for a third-party service provider. GiganticWebsites.com is my baby 100% and I will personally be involved in each and every project so as to ensure the website turns out great :)

  • @seankgomotso
    @seankgomotso 4 ปีที่แล้ว +88

    *THE BIG SHORT*

  • @OneMinuteEconomics
    @OneMinuteEconomics  4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Quick note, as always, in light of the difficult times many of you are surely going through: first and foremost, stay safe out there and don't expose yourself unnecessarily. But since you are home, please don't waste your entire day watching Netflix and instead, pay attention to the economic dimension of what is happening as well. More specifically, think about what the economy we will be returning to will look like when all is said and done. For the foreseeable future, I will try to exclusively publish videos which help with just that (videos about the financial system, risk factors it makes sense to be aware of and so on... there is a reason why I have published a video about Mortgage-Backed Securities, followed by one about credit rating agencies, followed by one about Collateralized Debt Obligations, with one about Collateralized Loan Obligations coming on Sunday). If you are in need of assistance or simply just a sympathetic ear, I'm here for you and can be reached at andrei at one minute economics dot com :)

  • @OneMinuteEconomics
    @OneMinuteEconomics  ปีที่แล้ว

    If you liked this video, I think you'll love The Age of Anomaly, my Wall Street Journal and USA Today best-selling book about preparing for financial calamities (whatever they may involve). You can buy it over at:
    1) Amazon: www.amazon.com/Reasonable-Case-Bitcoin-Andrei-Polgar-ebook/dp/B09G6Z45QB
    2) Barnes & Noble: www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-age-of-anomaly-andrei-polgar/1127084693?ean=2940155383970
    3) Apple Books: books.apple.com/us/book/the-age-of-anomaly-spotting-financial-storms-in/id1331704265
    4) Kobo: www.kobo.com/ww/en/ebook/the-age-of-anomaly-spotting-financial-storms-in-a-sea-of-uncertainty

  • @OneMinuteEconomics
    @OneMinuteEconomics  4 ปีที่แล้ว

    One Minute Economics needs your help! Please give me a minute (heh) of your time by watching the following video if you find the channel useful, literally anyone can help (either financially or by spreading the word about my work): th-cam.com/video/io04ckq1X1M/w-d-xo.html

    • @dukecamilo2041
      @dukecamilo2041 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      i know it's kinda off topic but do anybody know of a good place to stream new series online?

    • @ibrahimblake1219
      @ibrahimblake1219 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Duke Camilo Flixportal =)

    • @dukecamilo2041
      @dukecamilo2041 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Ibrahim Blake thanks, I signed up and it seems like a nice service :) Appreciate it !

    • @ibrahimblake1219
      @ibrahimblake1219 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Duke Camilo happy to help :)

  • @mrA353
    @mrA353 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Came here after The Big Short

    • @OneMinuteEconomics
      @OneMinuteEconomics  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Welcome aboard, would recommend also checking out my CLO video when you get a chance to (with CLOs being, according to some, the 2020 version of Mortgage-Backed Securities in terms of destructive potential): th-cam.com/video/xqnNxIcGDcw/w-d-xo.html

    • @laks2804
      @laks2804 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Watching now

  • @rigrag7876
    @rigrag7876 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    First of all I love the channel and as you said I think now is a good time to try and increase my knowledge rather than wasting these months doing nothing.
    I have a few questions. So Mortgage Backed Securities are a type of CDO? From watching The Big Short I thought that CDOs were often used as a way to use up all the rubbish mortgage bonds that nobody would initially buy due to their poor credit ratings. So was the main reason why CDO's had such a catastrophic impact in the financial crisis because the rating agencies gave these 'junk' mortgage bonds high ratings that they didn't warrant? Were CDO's largely used to mask worthless Mortgage bonds and get a ridiculously high rating to screw investors?

    • @OneMinuteEconomics
      @OneMinuteEconomics  4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Thanks a ton for the kind words! "Greed" is the operative word, on all fronts. On the one hand, financial products without these "questionable" bonds (borderline junk) would have generated unappealingly low yields but on the other hand, sophisticated investors have to adhere by certain rules/principles and therefore cannot just invest in random ultra-risky high-yield assets. In other words, we have greedy entities (saying this in a non-judgemental way btw) that want higher returns but need proper justifications for their actions... along came credit rating agencies and voila, their greed was facilitated by the shiny scores credit rating agencies gave to these products. All of a sudden, these sophisticated investors got their "yield fix" in a manner that enabled them to justify their actions to higher-ups... after all, they bought assets considered safe by credit rating agencies. Needless to say, it's game over once the chain breaks and investors lose confidence in these assets and especially when credit rating agencies follow suit by downgrading them and generating a vicious circle. Loss of confidence -> downgrades -> even more loss of confidence, etc.

  • @turneaandrei
    @turneaandrei 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It is happening all over again what happened in 2008.But now they call the instrument ""bespoke tranche opportunity""

  • @TruthFairy671
    @TruthFairy671 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm trying to understand why the banks were willingly buying the worthless MBS's from investors who bought into them early into the start of what became the 2008 housing crash. When the collapse was imminent and investors had a limited window into unloading their worthless bonds, what incentive did the banks have by buying them when they knew they were completely worthless? Basically my question is who was left holding the bag?

  • @ryanhartigan
    @ryanhartigan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for these videos! Super appreciate them!
    A couple questions that came up during this time: do the investors have access to the individualized bureaus or at least credit scores of the people/companies involved in these CDOs? How much of it is based on trust of the investment bank? Does the investment bank have any incentive to not be honest with the ratings? Do the investors get paid on defaults, on successful payoff of the loans, or are there different CDOs that are based on different indexes?

    • @OneMinuteEconomics
      @OneMinuteEconomics  4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thanks a lot for the questions, Ryan.
      To answer them all in one go, we'll start wit... the final one, haha. There are various different CDO types out there but the general rule as far as tranches are concerned is that the more "prudent" investors get paid first. In terms of incentives, the situation is extremely tricky because in my opinion, we are oftentimes in what one would call a moral hazard situation. As such, I'd recommend checking out two videos of mine, the moral hazard one and the video about credit rating agencies:
      th-cam.com/video/0mq4-fNCbhY/w-d-xo.html
      th-cam.com/video/goT1TWjqOnA/w-d-xo.html

    • @ryanhartigan
      @ryanhartigan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      One Minute Economics thank you I appreciate it!

  • @shogrran
    @shogrran 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    And while discussing these ratings and tranches... who tells the investors that the "AAA" loan is really an "AAA" loan.

    • @OneMinuteEconomics
      @OneMinuteEconomics  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Would recommend checking out my video about credit rating agencies when you get a chance to: th-cam.com/video/goT1TWjqOnA/w-d-xo.html

    • @jaylovestesla1099
      @jaylovestesla1099 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@OneMinuteEconomics just fkn answer the damn question btch

    • @sonalkumar9711
      @sonalkumar9711 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jaylovestesla1099 He did. Didn't he ??
      Its Credit rating agencies doing the work

  • @themalcontent100
    @themalcontent100 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We are seeing this in the game industry. But i don’t know what it would be called.
    Lots of high risk elements that are given low risk investment despite being very high risk.

  • @TheRobberyMilitia
    @TheRobberyMilitia 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So basically we issue out securities for a asset backed loan and depending on the rating certain investors take on the risk or not which is why some people are denied loans due to the packaging of the asset back securities either too low or too high for the investors risk tolerance 🤔🤔

  • @youshallreceivepower
    @youshallreceivepower 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you for explaining this so clearly

    • @OneMinuteEconomics
      @OneMinuteEconomics  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank YOU for taking the time to add positivity to this video by saying something nice :)

  • @asesoriasexani1209
    @asesoriasexani1209 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    awesome video!

  • @MajaroReal
    @MajaroReal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If you invest on this and people dont pay their loans what happens to your money? You just get it eventually but it takes more time if you are a junior investor or you could potentially lose your money?

    • @OneMinuteEconomics
      @OneMinuteEconomics  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It all depends on the tranche. If you opted for the option with the least impressive returns but best placement, you'll be first in line to get paid, whereas the most aggressive investors who wanted to maximize returns will be last in line but there are never 100% guarantees unfortunately, not even for the more prudent investors.

  • @Ahmed-vs1ui
    @Ahmed-vs1ui 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why are CDOs considered dogshit wrapped in catshit in The Big Short movie??

    • @OneMinuteEconomics
      @OneMinuteEconomics  4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Well, as represented in that movie: let's say a mortgage bond was dogs**t that didn't sell but they took a bunch of them and created a nice package (CDO) and once it was large enough, rating agencies rewarded them for diversifying and gave that package a very high rating. As such, they gave ultra-high ratings to... well, dogs**t wrapped in cats**t :)

    • @Ahmed-vs1ui
      @Ahmed-vs1ui 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      One Minute Economics Thank you so much😘

  • @jockin
    @jockin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I'm here because I need to write an essay on how the financial crisis from 2008 to 2009 began lol

    • @OneMinuteEconomics
      @OneMinuteEconomics  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Very interesting topic, be sure to also check out my video about Mortgage-Backed securities and my Great Recession one at the very least, probably also the Moral Hazard video. Good luck :)

    • @Youbeentagged
      @Youbeentagged 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I know I'm 3 years late, but the big short and margin call are really great places to begin.

  • @mohammedmansourr
    @mohammedmansourr ปีที่แล้ว

    Does the CDOs are effected by interest rates when the Fed raise them ?

  • @zak369
    @zak369 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much!

    • @OneMinuteEconomics
      @OneMinuteEconomics  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank YOU for the support Luize :)

    • @krunalrathod543
      @krunalrathod543 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What is CDO? How investement banks introduced this in 2008 crisis? Why investement banks buy loans from banks in 2008 to produce 2008?

  • @chakraqi6887
    @chakraqi6887 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Prime minister

  • @GiangNguyen-vr7iv
    @GiangNguyen-vr7iv ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm not a native speaker and I feel so hard to understand what you said :((

    • @OneMinuteEconomics
      @OneMinuteEconomics  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Sorry 'bout that. Maybe the playback speed reduction tool will help, I sometimes get carried away speed-wise :(

  • @roniquebreauxjordan1302
    @roniquebreauxjordan1302 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    CDO's

  • @bungus49
    @bungus49 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Synthetic CDOs lmfao

  • @phunwithphiphi8055
    @phunwithphiphi8055 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The hierarchical organisational chart confused me why are mezzanine tranches subordinate to junior tranches?

    • @OneMinuteEconomics
      @OneMinuteEconomics  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sorry for the confusion, it was meant to get the idea across that mezzanine tranches are somewhere in-between :)

    • @phunwithphiphi8055
      @phunwithphiphi8055 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@OneMinuteEconomics No apology necessary I was far more enlightened than confused, thank you.

  • @krunalrathod543
    @krunalrathod543 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Didn't understand anything

    • @OneMinuteEconomics
      @OneMinuteEconomics  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sorry to hear that, feel free to ask if there's anything specific you'd like me to clarify and I'll do my best :)

    • @krunalrathod543
      @krunalrathod543 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@OneMinuteEconomics How investement banks made money through CDO?

    • @OneMinuteEconomics
      @OneMinuteEconomics  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Simple:
      Step 1) Banks lend money to people and sell those loans to investment banks (not just mortgages like with Mortgage-Backed Securities but also a wide range of other debt such as credit card debt, corporate loans, etc.)
      Step 2) Investment banks package a bunch of those loans together and create Collateralized Debt Obligations, which they sell to various investors
      Simply put, investment banks make money by selling the various CDOs they create to other investors. But them from banks at low enough prices, package them nicely, sell to investors for more. Rinse and repeat :)

    • @krunalrathod543
      @krunalrathod543 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@OneMinuteEconomics so the final risk is on the investors. How banks and investement banks failed?

    • @krunalrathod543
      @krunalrathod543 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@OneMinuteEconomics and investement banks are taking money from investors so investement banks need to repay them and give them interest also.

  • @Jorge-vv6mj
    @Jorge-vv6mj ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I Didnt Understand Shit

  • @princeXD837
    @princeXD837 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Batch D zindabad 🏃🏃🏃🥳

  • @amelias.wodehouse4064
    @amelias.wodehouse4064 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir, nothing is hard to understand IF you have a good teacher so with that said because YOU think its hard to understand and say so then YOUR not a goid teacher for others! bye

  • @montypython4743
    @montypython4743 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Poorly explained and confusing!

    • @OneMinuteEconomics
      @OneMinuteEconomics  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you'd like to, let me know what you found confusing and I will do my best to help