Classical and Quantum Information in DNA (Google Workshop on Quantum Biology)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.ค. 2024
- Google Workshop on Quantum Biology
Classical and Quantum Information in DNA
Presented by Elisabeth Rieper
October 22, 2010
ABSTRACT
DNA stores and replicates information. Special sequences of different nucleic acids (adenine, cytosine, guanine, thymine) encode life's blueprints. These nucleic acids can be divided into a classical part (massive core) and a quantum part (electron shell and single protons). The laws of quantum mechanics map the classical information (A,C,G,T) onto the configuration of electrons and position of single protons. Although DNA replication requires perfect copies of the classical information, the core that constitutes this information does not directly interact with the copying machine. Instead, only the quantum degrees of freedom are measured. Thus successful copying requires a correct translation of classical to quantum to classical information. It has been shown [1] that the electronic system is well shielded from thermal noise. This leads to entanglement inside the DNA helix. It is an open question if this entanglement influences the genetic information processing. In this talk I will discuss possible consequences of entanglement for the information flow and the similarities and differences between classical computing, quantum computing and DNA information processing.
[1] E. Rieper, J. Anders, V. Vedral: The relevance of continuous variable entanglement in DNA, arXiv:1006.4053
About the speaker: Elisabeth Rieper - 2007: Diploma thesis in entanglement theory under supervision of Reinhard Werner. Since 2008: PhD studies in 'Quantum Coherence in Biological Systems' at CQT Singapore under supervision of Vlatko Vedral. This includes both finite dimensional entanglement (spin-spin entanglement in the avian compass, arxiv: 0906.3725) as well as infinite dimensional entanglement (phonons in the electronic degrees of freedom in DNA, arxiv: 1006.4053), exploiting correlations for work extraction (The work value of information, arXiv:0908.0424) and complexity theory.
Currently investigating the possible influence of entanglement on the information flow in biological systems. - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
As long term biochemist UCB graduate and Chinese Medical doctor, I find this brilliant...entanglement has been experienced in TCM treatments, dreams and life... great courage you have to propose the science!!
I enjoyed this video so much, thank you for uploading
dope af!!!!! seriously amazing work prof doc!
Yes man yes 🙌
In-form-ation, formulae, active format, modules of resonances => Act-uality of Time Timing Spinfoam, QM-Time Totality => Phys-Chem connection of Recorded Feedback, DNA etc of the living systems.
Good talk for 2010...
Great presentation, really enjoyable!
Gorgeous! Oh I mean great video!
Correct, Quantum Prophecies, only the carrier is physical. In addition, information in Shannon's theory is not the H of the source as implied here, but the difference of the source H overall with that of a particular message received.
Very interesting approach. DNA is in deed a quantum system. The problem is to find its logic gates. Binary code has only 2 digits and 7 logic gates. For a 4 digits code will need way more than this... in the digital world.
Assert this:
The DNA helix has 2 SIDES: L(left), R (right)
T = UP in L, DOWN in R
A = LEFT in L, RIGHT in R
C = DOWN in L, UP in R
G = RIGHT in L, LEFT in R
Assert an T A G A C G A string => T->A, A->T, G->C, A->T, C->G, G->C, A->T
Result :
UP-RIGHT
LEFT-DOWN
DOWN-UP
LEFT-DOWN
DOWN-LEFT
RIGHT-UP
LEFT-DOWN
This is a very trivial simulation with comprehensive terms...
As you can see will NEVER be UP-DOWN or LEFT-RIGHT situations that can cancel themselves off...
What she said is sketchy because is a beginning... but is a very strong starting point for a new area of research. Good stuff!
seriously, imo this presentation introduces a breakthrough, yet in a video watched by some 17,000. I zhink zee should write a paper on zhis.
so charmant wie großartig.
Can't understand at 26:23 why does she say the classical channel is too small. Bit quick for me at that bit.
Anybody understand?
I just found an inch and say in North Carolina that is preserved in Rich red clay. They cover the artwork that they created in this clay and I need to get it carbonated or studied. I can see the eyes but others cannot because it takes a while to learn how to see the art please said correspondence if you can help
She's so beautiful. And SMART. :) Great presentation, vital information these days.
Some one asked long ago...
Q: what bosson participate in the interaction of molecules into cells, cells into tissues, tissues into organs etc?
A) though bosons act as field catalysts and stimulus on quantum field level, field catalysts and stimilus on eather field level are different..enzymes..etc
Unfortunately for the ether field unlike the quantum field, it converges through vibrational frequency and diverges through frequency resonation inform of vibration frequency resonation..eather not a medium but vibrational frequency resonation.
Frequency resonation converts negentropy into entropy through classical landscape(which is quantum info in nature), and vibration frequency converts entropy into negentropy through quantum field(which is classical info in nature).
And when. And the classical quantum reduction and production justifies the complex limits of vibration frequency resonation in polynomial time.
Yes I finally found a something that gave me me a straight answer on whether or not nucleosides contains quantum information
If I’m understanding that right
The female version of Kripky from the Big Bang Theory. Good lecture!
ALL-WITGH
A good thinking
It makes me wonder if quantum entanglements transmit the phase of polarization.
Please type "True Theory of Everything Quadrant Model of Reality 1" into TH-cam for the theory of everything. Thank you.
That should work...as long as she...and anyone else...isn't forced to actually observe them.
This means of course we'll never be able to copy a consciousness. That's a shame as I had hoped to be able to download mine before I died....
She has a super position of r's and w's. But she's fantastic though, great presentation!
Have you looked at her r's to check ?
I think she is a German who was taught British English by (or near) the French. That's my hypothesis. Anyways, very interesting talk!
shes actually very likely from the Netherlands. people forget this part of Europe. and its actually among some of the most important countries. very forward looking and ahead of their time i would say. in the words of the docuseries "Adams" by HBO, the government Adams adresses says " we were a republic since 1500" . very forward looking.
Great talk!!
4:59 - Shannon entropy
ze information is ze zusefull zhank you mizz
I have a question for you please... apparently, someone made an experiment where the dna of a person was put in a room and the owner of that dna was put in another room ... when this subject was exposed at any stimulation the dna in the separate room would response at exactly the same time than the stimulus received on the pacient.... could you please share a link of this experiment if any thanks
I can't unhear the uwu-speak in her accent, and now I'm enjoying this talk even more.
Such a great talk, so many strange comments, many commenters without even a profile pic. MFW this thread O_o
I also enjoyed this article, which condenses some of the information discussed here. I look forward to future work, particularly experiments, but also see little reason to hesitate in the exploration and application of such ideas.
www.technologyreview.com/view/419590/quantum-entanglement-holds-dna-together-say-physicists/
"information is physical" - no, it requires a "physical carrier"
+Quantum Prophecies You're just nit-picking a matter of approach... as she said, she's a physicist, so the method by which information is represented is physical. When I say that food is nutritional, you may as well contradict me by saying that food carries nutrients. Such nit-pickery serves no function. Then again... your name is 'Quantum Prophecies', so I assume you're quiet familiar with sentences that serve no function.
***** Care to elaborate what that point is, exactly, and how it isn't merely a semantic complaint?
James Hansen, information is not physical because it can be identified as separate from its physical carrier. Ink and paper are physical; their arrangement is the physical carrier of information, therefore, they physically (ink & paper) are not information. The information is mental, that is to say, it is an idea, a non-corporal thing. Food and nutrition cannot be separated. Food does not carry nutrition, it is nutrition. You are convoluting the idea “food” or “nutrition” which is not physical from the physical substance of nutritional food.
You also make a logic error in this statement “…as she said, she's a physicist, so the method by which information is represented is physical” just think about for a minute? Does her profession determine the nature of information? Does the meaning behind the title of her profession (physicist) have anything to do with determining the physicality of information? The understanding of information is subtle and your claim that Quantum Prophecies’s statement (“no, it requires a physical carrier”) as “nit-picking” is, with all due respect, sophistry.
In what way (other than with information) can you show *what* *precisely* you mean by a "physical carrier?" Any "physical carrier" or "medium" must in fact have some informational content--if that content is nothing, then you are back to the same problem you started with. To say that "information requires a physical carrier" is kicking the problem back into ancient metaphysical presuppositions--which is to say that we answer the question by saying "it is what it is"
sedevacantist1 Can you give an example of information that does not require a physical carrier?
you and me ... 300 Kelvin... enough said..
對去氧核糖核酸之量子資訊思考之路
how the eff can she pronounce the "r" in "gretchen" perfectly fine, but not any other "r" in the rest of her speach?? "memowie" anyone?
She pronounced the R in Gretchen with a heavy German accent.
She can entangle my qubits anytime
Cloning requires not just observation, but an intelligence driving the result, this I think takes away just a tad from what she is saying. Cloning is actually only what we observer after intelligently designing to achieve a result. For what that is worth.
5:19 logarithm of that number... sorry google-youtube your caption writing algorithm clearly misses her accent. Maybe, much later when quantum computer AI-s will do sound recognition but by then percepcion will be anyway questionable by todays terms. and all consciousness probably merge in the future with some quantum device with AI. Plus V.R. and A.R. like that of birds vision and earth's magnetic field.
Actually, that's a German accent with some cross-fertilisation from Chinese.
The math implies in some universes she has... woooooo!
I would like to gain more knowledge of you Elisabeth... ;)
she is a hot scientist.
vewi interwesting.
I quite like her Frenglish :)
Free Thinker, I think she's German
She speaks English, are you able to speak German or French?
Now I know I'm a geek because I understood that :)
It is so good to see a woman presenting on these youtube quantum physics/biology lectures
wow, stop being so sexist. Gender isn't a thing.
I believe the observer problem is real and that this is trying to be trivialized by the dogmatic materialists. If you incorporate the anthropic principles, we may be on to why the universe has to be fined tuned and that was inevitable, as an intelligent conscious observer designed things "just so" trying to postulate multiple universes without any evidence of their existence is a cheap shot and shameless adding of complexity on top of complexity which is a no-no of Occam's razor apart. It almost seems a a desperate attempt to keep intelligence and consciousness somehow "supernatural" when all of our examples show us that it is just as natural as any other part of particle physics. Just because one is stuck in thinking that consciousness is the Epiphenomenon of matter, does not make it so. Penrose and others have done a spectacular job keeping the rational explanations rather than the fantasies and faith statements of scientists from distracting us this very exciting and elegant solution. The ONLY reason for a multiverse theory was to nullify probabilities that are not just a tad right but scream out that it was not a "bang" it was more like a growth of an intelligent system. I predict we will slow down eventually in expansion, just like a brain does after its growth spurt.
That does sound very much like a German accent.
The answer is yes,yes,yes and no but the variable are to many for you or any human to know that is just the way it is. Some questions should not even be asked it is not for us to know Can you grasp this now?
Maybe not ready for delivering a talk in English...yet. Vocal information is de-cohering at times.
long term stowage haha im sorry pretty funny though
WHO IS SHE OMG
hahahaha
silly wabbit
tricks aren't for kids
I wonder if the qubit will lead us back to the cubit
She has a speech imperilment, hehe
hot wife=hard drive please read the subtitles people.
I hate that rabbit... :)
HAHAHA hes the only one with a tie
I love the name Elizabeth Reaper. I just got divorced I may change my name to that. 🤩
Kb is a constant, dont care too much about its meaning, haha, why do you physicists always say that?!? Obviously it matter!!!!
excuse me can I talk to Mr Boltzmann for a moment?
So evolution happens with quantum biology not classical. Not only evolution but birth to death, daily life as well.
Grghhh.
rude
wabbit
very controversial
I don't think she understands the physical chemistry of DNA...
+offmeds2nite What makes you say that?
that accent.......................