"These shelves house books and double as seating and stairs fusing function and design.." Those are terrible shelves. You have to get on all fours to find a book. Also, I guess screw anyone in a wheel chair. This is a classic example of design over function. Nice renders though.
I agree. On top of that, if you look at the actual photos of the finished building published on archdaily for example, probably less than 50% of the shelves that look like they carry books actually have books on them. The rest are just printed panels to look like books. Granted, you would not be able to reach those places if they had real books on them, but then why pretend? It feels like they designed a space they liked aesthetically and then forced the function of a library onto it.
@@旅-d8g Oh wow, I see. That is even more stupid then. If you see some of the "concept" diagrams on archdaily, you can see that they are basically saying nothing at all and are just made up to look like they justify the result.
If everything was created just for certain purpose of mere efficiency above aesthetics, how boring the world would be, and at some level aesthetics itself has a purpose. That's why there are diversity of designs, styles, types. I want to see your work, Where is your reel or portfolio? I want to observe it
@@Albert_Riseal Sure, I love art and design a lot. But a library has a function - to find and read books. If that function is hindered because of an artistic design decision, than it has fundamentally failed. But of course its the difference between art and design. Art can just exist and doesn't have to be justified, design does. Since a library is a public place and FOR the public, it should also be designed for the public. Anyways, I am sure the architect will be successful in places like China and Dubai, where its all about the looks and people are considered later. Why would I need to show you my portfolio? I don't know what that has to do with anything?
This design seem to be designed for a place like that, Singapore, Dubai, etc. On the other hand: I live in a ''developing country' and I've found in my small place like at least 10 'public' libraries, each with its own unique design. If my poor city has such variety of libraries, a place like Singapore probably has twice of such number. I think it is good to have diversity of places with different styles so people can decide where to go, satisfying many tastes or interests. I'm just curious about exactly what types of designs you considered as the optimal/best?
Nice D5 render team! But focus please on how to improve more realism materials especially when you zoom in and make the resolution of the render smooth and realism like corona. 🙏 i am commenting this because i am your monthly subscribers on the software. 🙏💯
so the seats are where the books are placed too? what if someone needs to look books that are being covered by the person or people sitting on that spot? is that well thought of? and plus a library has to look "homey" IMO and not looking like a gigantic lobby and you shouldnt be distracted by everything in front of you. :)
Amazing project, I like it. D5 is one of the greatest
Amazing. 👍
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
❤
please make tutorials on 360 degree walkthrough in D5
una locura mantener limpio ese lugar...
"These shelves house books and double as seating and stairs fusing function and design.." Those are terrible shelves. You have to get on all fours to find a book. Also, I guess screw anyone in a wheel chair. This is a classic example of design over function. Nice renders though.
I agree. On top of that, if you look at the actual photos of the finished building published on archdaily for example, probably less than 50% of the shelves that look like they carry books actually have books on them. The rest are just printed panels to look like books. Granted, you would not be able to reach those places if they had real books on them, but then why pretend? It feels like they designed a space they liked aesthetically and then forced the function of a library onto it.
@@旅-d8g Oh wow, I see. That is even more stupid then. If you see some of the "concept" diagrams on archdaily, you can see that they are basically saying nothing at all and are just made up to look like they justify the result.
If everything was created just for certain purpose of mere efficiency above aesthetics, how boring the world would be, and at some level aesthetics itself has a purpose. That's why there are diversity of designs, styles, types. I want to see your work, Where is your reel or portfolio? I want to observe it
@@Albert_Riseal Sure, I love art and design a lot. But a library has a function - to find and read books. If that function is hindered because of an artistic design decision, than it has fundamentally failed. But of course its the difference between art and design. Art can just exist and doesn't have to be justified, design does. Since a library is a public place and FOR the public, it should also be designed for the public. Anyways, I am sure the architect will be successful in places like China and Dubai, where its all about the looks and people are considered later. Why would I need to show you my portfolio? I don't know what that has to do with anything?
This design seem to be designed for a place like that, Singapore, Dubai, etc. On the other hand: I live in a ''developing country' and I've found in my small place like at least 10 'public' libraries, each with its own unique design. If my poor city has such variety of libraries, a place like Singapore probably has twice of such number. I think it is good to have diversity of places with different styles so people can decide where to go, satisfying many tastes or interests. I'm just curious about exactly what types of designs you considered as the optimal/best?
Nice D5 render team! But focus please on how to improve more realism materials especially when you zoom in and make the resolution of the render smooth and realism like corona. 🙏 i am commenting this because i am your monthly subscribers on the software. 🙏💯
so the seats are where the books are placed too? what if someone needs to look books that are being covered by the person or people sitting on that spot? is that well thought of? and plus a library has to look "homey" IMO and not looking like a gigantic lobby and you shouldnt be distracted by everything in front of you. :)
Totally agree. It's one of those "looks cool, doesn't work" kind of projects.
You couldnt make this in America, with all the protection laws