A far more charitable reply to him than my own. At this point, it's clear whatever his argument's form, there is only one arrow: infant baptism is necessary to be Reformed. Nevermind there are very good Reformed Historical Scholars who have taken him to task for that take. Nevermind our political theology is more Reformed than his, and he flunks the Westminster wayback by his own logic. To be Reformed is to baptize babies. It's a terrible take. And at times I think he's argued it in bad faith even. But he's staked too much of his reputation on it to back down.
Thanks sharing this with pedo friend that's saying I'm not reformed 😂
Lol
A far more charitable reply to him than my own. At this point, it's clear whatever his argument's form, there is only one arrow: infant baptism is necessary to be Reformed. Nevermind there are very good Reformed Historical Scholars who have taken him to task for that take. Nevermind our political theology is more Reformed than his, and he flunks the Westminster wayback by his own logic. To be Reformed is to baptize babies.
It's a terrible take. And at times I think he's argued it in bad faith even. But he's staked too much of his reputation on it to back down.