excellent comparison, Daniel. Kind of happy, that the results ar similar otherwise an explanation for difference would be needed ... :-) Please do more of these!
@@danielpelka50 It would be very useful if you could show how you made your Sofistik model. I searched a lot, but sadly I couldn't find a good video showing the process of modeling the stiffeners in a steel plate girder via Sofistik.
Yeah, it would be a interesting comparison. Right now I design a lot of steel structures, but in a few months i will design concrete structure with prestressing so then i can do some nonlinear analysis with concrete :)
excellent comparison, Daniel. Kind of happy, that the results ar similar otherwise an explanation for difference would be needed ... :-)
Please do more of these!
Hello Daniel,
Could you please share the Sofistik and RFEM model files?
Can sofistik generate wind loadings or snow loadings
Thanks for your video, How could you model the stiffeners in the Sofistik?
This model was made from quad elements (plates).
@@danielpelka50 It would be very useful if you could show how you made your Sofistik model. I searched a lot, but sadly I couldn't find a good video showing the process of modeling the stiffeners in a steel plate girder via Sofistik.
@@Marcopolofinland No problem :) give me few weeks
@@danielpelka50 Thank you very much :)
How to add the local and global imperfection in RFEM?
Hello, try testing reinforced concrete deformations in nonlinear analysis using Sofistik and RFEM. :) You'll see a huge difference in that.
Yeah, it would be a interesting comparison. Right now I design a lot of steel structures, but in a few months i will design concrete structure with prestressing so then i can do some nonlinear analysis with concrete :)
Is it RFEM 5 or RFEM 6?
At that time i tested both but this is probably 6
The output graphics of Sofistik are kind of better looking, easier to document and present the results.
I also like sofistiks output, but rememeber that outputs from rfem are modificalable