JustaTree If you are going to compare two things you need to know what they are first. You can't compare apples and oranges if you don't know whats an apple and whats an orange.
***** Well a youtube comment is really no place to discuss what they do. Someone interested in what they do can google it and get more information than what someone could give in a youtube comment
Film cameras are really nice, I recommend everybody use them sometime. It teaches you to not be lazy with your photography and also gives you much more respect for pretty much everything to do with pictures. You can also mix your own solutions for hella cheap so it just takes more time than digital nowadays.
I just got into film, amazing process, especially learning to develop it yourself! And you get a physical copy of all of your pictures, which you can reprint infinitely!
CCD sensors have lower digital noise when given enough light but they are terrible in low light. CMOS sensors are kind of the opposite however the technology for CMOS is improving too.
This again, makes me wonder how efficient and effective our eye's mechanism of capturing and processing images when comparing to the current technology (May/2020).
I think the reaosn why people are so confused about this one is that he didn't really take the tie to explain the OLD system of how images are captured. With film photography, the lens of your camera leads light into the rectangular hole right in front of the film when the shutter opens. The film is made of a special material consisting of crystals sensitive to light on a transparent piece of plastic. It's literally a piece of transparent tape lined with crystal. When the film is developed, parts of the film that receive more light become black, and parts that recieved no light basically fall of the tape, leaving transparent film. This is why developed film is "negative", or reversed color. A DIGITAL IMAGE SENSOR attempts to work the same way as how the crystals on traditional film are CHEMICALLY ALTERED when exposed to light. Think of the sensor as that film that lies behind that rectangular hole in a film camera, but in a much smaller size, and instead of "crystals" that get exposed to light at a microscopic scale, you have little teeeny tiny squares, one for EVERY PIXEL, that are each recording data for the amount of exposure to light, and the color of that light, among other information (color has temperature and tint as well as exposure, there are lots of variables). So instead of developing a piece of FILM to remove MICROSCOPIC CRYSTALS to give a perfect image, a sensor is reciving pixel-to-pixel information, and a computer chip is processing the value of every one of those pixels.
Linus! A Topic for you! Can you PLEASE make a comparison once and for all about what the big differences are between DLP and LCD Projectors!? I am really stuck as to which type of projector has the least amount of input lag as possible (for gaming of course). Can you please settle this? Thank you so much for your consideration.
I've heard from some a few years ago that the extreme enthusiasts only use film because of it's pure nature. I wonder how true that is or will be as the digital photo process get's so much better than it was.
MrTitskie His site is probably the most visited photography website on the internet, he reviews everything. And with that much traffic he tells people that JPEG is better than RAW despite RAW being better in every way and by far, he tells people to shoot in auto mode, or P mode, which he actually believes stands for "professional", and a whole bunch of other stupid shit, he's basically just a dad with a camera that got lucky with traffic and now he's capable of spreading stupidity and terrible advice to millions.
Linus... as much as I love you (being the 14th that you published it), I have to disagree: CCD technology USED to have lower noise at specifics ISOs, specially lower ones. Which for most professional photography types, is needed most. But things have changed in the last 8 years. CMOS sensors have reached the same level of noise at low ISOs, while retaining greater IQ in the high ISOs, as they have better signal amplifiers, and specially since the convertion to digital has fewer steps, and therefore, less electronic noise is created. Anyway, almost all camera manufacturers have switched by now to CMOS, instead of CCD. Perhaps there are a couple medium format sensors out there that are CCD, but don't expect them to be many.
its funny that i was serching for"zfs as fast as possible" instead of google it....i like you guyz how you explain points..and mostly how you connect sponsered ad..😃😃
There's a major difference between CCD and CMOS that linus got very wrong: CCD sensors in most cases have multiple sensor panels stitched together to form one unit, and while it provides a higher overall sharpness, they're less reliable in low light due to the much lower iso efficiancy with noise; whereas a CMOS sensor will be a single panel sensor, which gives it the greater ability in low light as it's only one unit communicating with the cpu. if you try using a CCD sensor in low light vs a CMOS sensor, the CCD still is going to look like swiss cheese by comparison
It was my understanding CCD pixels operate on principles making them closer to photodiodes, gathering electrons and holes, while CMOS image sensor pixels operate by way of the same principle as xerox machines and laser printers, id est the fact photons reduce the static charge of a charged substrate when absorbed by it. I think the charged substrate for CMOS sensors would be capacitors. A friend of my fathers that use to work at Micron once spoke of the way people noticed dynamic ram chips without their packaging could act like primitive image sensors if you just read the memory addresses before filling all their digits with ones again. Was never very practical because of the spare addresses they print on the dies to replace dead addresses, plus the arrangement of the individual addresses, and the devices making them up, does not lend itself geometrically to putting the image together after getting the values. I also once found an electronics enthusiasts magazine from somewhere in the eighties with an article in it discussing whether ccd or dynamic ram was going to become the dominant RAM technology. Thought that was interesting...
actually ccd should be the one with rolling shutter issues, because with ccd rows are being read out one after another, while cmos reads all rows simultaneously.
The sensor may only be exposed to light for a fraction of a second due to some sort of shutter/electronic shutter, and CMOS may be exposed the entire time it is being processed, because it can be processed faster, i.e. the CMOS sensor does not require a shutter, but the CCD needs one to operate properly, and the shutter that has been installed on the CCD just happens to be better than the CMOS.
Should you put annotations over the "get started" box of the squarespace ad? It's kind of misleading us a bit thinking that "get started" box is clickable when it's not...
I remember the days when digital cameras were not very common and the internet was not full of photos in the same way as it is today. In those days the digital cameras that did exist were crappy and expensive. I am glad that now a decent one can be had for the same price or even less. I like how smartphones are coming with good cameras. If you ever had an Xperia or similar phone you would know exactly what I mean. I like the way prices keep falling while technology keeps getting better.
I knew it! "Intel Inside" just meant they wanted to get into my brain! wait... that tune was catchy... so they already are! Thanks for clearing that up :)
The way this video is presented it would make one think that only CCD sensors have a rolling electronic shutter and only CMOS sensors have a global electronic shutter. The reality is the opposite: most CCD sensors use global shutters and most CMOS sensors use rolling shutters. Good video though.
Oh good heaven's, I had forgotten about geocities. Good explanation, Linus. Was hoping for a shout-out to us microscope users when you said "specialized uses for CCD sensors" but oh well.
there's also something called neocities thats works as a replacement, also if you look up achiveteam they have partly archived geocities before it went kill
LOL, most people don't understood a single thing...Now, do you finally get that we consumers, prosumers don't know a shit about nothing...Now, imagine actually coding for all this stuff...that's why a product comparison should not be just about specs... E.g- want a graphics card? Compare fps on the games that YOU want to play. Phones or any other electronics should only be judged on real world performance. There is a lot of stuff that goes into making the phone even with the same SOC. For more detailed reviews go to AnandTech's or similar websites. On TH-cam, linus is the only one that I keep getting back to.
Great explanation! The question that I have is on the comparison of ccd vs cmos. You had mentioned that ccd is better in low light over cmos. The issue I have with this comparison is that in most digital cameras (i.e. a Leica M using CCD and a Nikon DSLR using cmos) the ccd cameras have moved over to cmos sensors in consumer/commercial applications due to cmos having better low light capability by the way of increasing the sensors sensitivity know as ISO. In a CCD sensor this sensitivity increase "cap" is typically much lower before you start to product unwanted noise in the resulting image. This is why Leica cameras (even though very expensive yet product great images) have a much lower ISO rating than most entry level/consumer DSLR cameras of today that use Cmos. Were you referring to the CCD sensors having better noise handling at lower sensitivity (ISO) ratings compared to a CMOS sensor, at the same ISO? Im just curious on this. Thanks!
I'm dating a Photographer, and I hate people taking pictures vs enjoying the concert... Put down your cell phone, and stop recording it's shitty audio and enjoy the show. I sound like a frumpy old man.
Nah I agree. I'm a photographer too, but my camera never enters a concert, play or anything like that. I think it's disrespectful to take pictures and film it unless you're on staff. Just enjoy it and keep it as a memory.
Agreed. Especially when the concert is being professional shot and you can watch THAT video online for free. Search for jimmy kimmel live and look at all the concert videos from last year. Every other person has their camera/cell phone recording. It's ridiculous.
dude fuck that. happiness is only real when shared and memory's are the most important things to have so why not create these memory's so you can store and share them forever?
image quality in respect to image sensors is affected more by sensor size, more than resolution. for instance, a 50MP medium format camera will be more detailed and sharper than a 50MP full frame or apsc camera. kinda disappointed linus didnt talk about the sensor size part of the equation since its one of the most important factors of an image sensor.
You cannot deal without both datas. A 50mp medium format will be as sharper as 50mpx FF. The advantage of medium format in that case is pixel density. With the same image's resolution, the Medium Format is better in low light and in dynamic range
A question about the sensor. Which one is better and offers the better image quality? 1/2.5" Progressive Scan CMOS 1/2" Progressive Scan CMOS 1/1.8" Progressive Scan CMOS
So for mobile phones, are CCD or CMOS used? Because i bought a cheap phone and it says it has a CMOS sensor and i dont know if thats a good thing for a phone or not.
In some circumstances i prefer Film over Digital photography, mainly in landscape photography. My Large Format camera far exceeds any Digital Camera in terms of Resolution, And it exceeds most in image quality. Only downside is it takes a few hours before a image is taken (not the exposure time). But if i use digital, i use CDD cameras. (and yes, CCD DSLR's exist)
CCD cameras haven't been around for years. What camera do you use? Have it occurr to you that it may be a reason for that? Large format cameras have advantages... true. But it's not like the final IQ is better, if you may be able to do several exposures, and process 16 bit RAW. Or even... have you tried shooting at ISO 3200 with the Pentax 645Z? There is absolutely no way a LF camera could even get close to that. It's over Kodak. Accept it.
Alan Schamber The CCD has been around a long time now, it was invented back in 1969. And speaking from experience, CCD cameras have beaten all my CMOS based cameras, in Astrophotography. In normal photography i use a Sony A350, as well as a Sony A6000. Both are good cameras, if you know how to use them. Also to you statement of LF vs. MF vs 35mm, in every test i have done my LF camera exceeded even digital MF cameras such as the Hasselblad H4D39 in image quality, dynamic range (just barley though, it also depends on the film), and resolution. Granted it takes a Drumscanner to actually achieve this. Also i use both Kodak- and Fuji Film. Shooting film is just different then digital, it does not forgive any mistakes, and that is good training for Photography. Oh, and BTW the Pentax 645D dose not go up to ISO3200 it maximum ISO is 1600. Also based on what i know about the Pentax 645D, its image quality is not all to impressive compared to a Hasselblad or a Phase One.
Alan Schamber Also you truely belive that a little Pentax 645D can outperform a 8x10" LF camera using Kodak Ektar 100, or Fujifl Velvia 50? As well as, say a Rodenstock Sironar-S Lens. in that configuration the camera is unbeatable. And yes, i have seen professional photographers use this in thair work. I talked to a guy doing a Building image of a local company, and he had the fallowing camera: Nikon D800 with a wide angle lens. Phase One MF digital back on a 4x5 LF body. And a 8x10 using film (cant remember the model). Both LF cameras had Rodenstock Lenses. I asked him why he had these exact cameras, he told me that the 8x10 is needed due to its resolution and image quality. As the Client wants large prints at high resolution. The other cameras are used to create a "backup" of the 8x10s film images. Just in case the film gets damaged. The D800 was used to capture from another perspective for a Catalog. Also have you even shot a image with the Pentax 645D? Because to me it sounds like you have not.
First.... I talked about the 645Z. You are outdated. Secondly... the Sony A6000 is a CMOS camera. Third: film is the one that has more forgiveness to give, unless you shoot with a positive one. You cannot recover a RAW file for even 20% you can recover negative film. And yes... CCD cameras have been used for a long time. But in recent years, CMOS have taken all the market. Even LEICA. Yep... even them. So please, read.
After reading the second comment... here it goes... I'll just copy and paste my first comment. I have ALREADY answered you that: "Large format cameras have advantages... true. But it's not like the final IQ is better, if you may be able to do several exposures, and process 16 bit RAW. Or even... have you tried shooting at ISO 3200 with the Pentax 645Z? There is absolutely no way a LF camera could even get close to that. It's over Kodak. Accept it." Large format cameras have advantages, IF they are shooting something really specific. But the real reason that photographer was shooting with that configuration, is because large format can shift the film, with no need for a tilt- shift lens, which is quite expensive. Welcome to the pro's world.
Why is there more green on digital? And why was blue more common on film/analog? Curious to know since I'm into Sci-Fi (use of blue screens and green screens)
This video misleads all the point. The CCD sensor are historically less expensive to produce than the CMOS (Read any digital photography book). The CCD sensor needs less power than the CMOS due to the sensor layers: CCD reads light through a RGB Bayer Colour Filter (25%R + 25%G + 50%B) that is why you will find them on phone cameras, compact cameras or in the first digital cameras. While the CMOS has 4 sensor layers to each one of the RGB Colour (100%R + 100%G + 100%B) and you will prefer to have them on DSLRs cameras due to fullframe, more colour space with bigger processors and RAW formats. :)
Anyone else catch the 2 in the binary numbers at 1:53 ?
yes
It wouldn't be binary then. It would be ternary.
***** yes
Didn't even need to see it to believe it. I knew LMG would do something like that as soon as I saw all the 1's and 0's.
indeed, fail
CUDA CORES vs STREAM PROCESSORS PLEASE
Same thing, just different words.
"Cuda cores" is a term used by Nvidia. "Stream processors" is a term used by AMD
Wawaweewa Rice You still didn't explain what they are or what they do. You just talked about the naming.
***** he said vs. not what are they
JustaTree If you are going to compare two things you need to know what they are first. You can't compare apples and oranges if you don't know whats an apple and whats an orange.
***** Well a youtube comment is really no place to discuss what they do. Someone interested in what they do can google it and get more information than what someone could give in a youtube comment
This was a nice rap song!
LMAO!
What? My name is. What? My name is. What? My names is... LINUS
i realize Im quite randomly asking but do anyone know of a good site to watch new movies online ?
@Mekhi Gary Flixportal
@Reyansh Holden Thanks, I signed up and it seems to work :D Appreciate it !!
this guy's voice is sometimes hard to listen to, but this is just the video I needed to watch, answered all my questions
Film cameras are really nice, I recommend everybody use them sometime. It teaches you to not be lazy with your photography and also gives you much more respect for pretty much everything to do with pictures. You can also mix your own solutions for hella cheap so it just takes more time than digital nowadays.
The "hella cheap" part sure didnt age well
*nods*, *nods*
So they work through magic.. Got it!
I just got into film, amazing process, especially learning to develop it yourself! And you get a physical copy of all of your pictures, which you can reprint infinitely!
Thank you for explaining it concisely
Yes I totally and completely understood everything in this video because I'm so smart... *cough*
yo watch out. if that cough gets worse you might want to go to a doctor. but you're so smart u probly dont need me to tell you
You need cough drops?
...cough...cough
Shit its contageous
Ebola
JustAnotherOneOfThoseLong UnoriginalNames ebolalalalalaa
CCD sensors have lower digital noise when given enough light but they are terrible in low light. CMOS sensors are kind of the opposite however the technology for CMOS is improving too.
Linus lost me at 0:15 , after that i just zoned out and realized it was 4 in the morning
it's 5 in the morning now..
Jerkface155 and im still awake...
Same lol
Jerkface155 what is wrong with us
Nothing
Was that whole video done in one take? BREATHE LINUS
1:37 "in your br%@#in"
gale HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
This again, makes me wonder how efficient and effective our eye's mechanism of capturing and processing images when comparing to the current technology (May/2020).
and it's quite funny that we're praising analog video/audio when our nervous system is technically digital.
I think the reaosn why people are so confused about this one is that he didn't really take the tie to explain the OLD system of how images are captured.
With film photography, the lens of your camera leads light into the rectangular hole right in front of the film when the shutter opens. The film is made of a special material consisting of crystals sensitive to light on a transparent piece of plastic. It's literally a piece of transparent tape lined with crystal.
When the film is developed, parts of the film that receive more light become black, and parts that recieved no light basically fall of the tape, leaving transparent film. This is why developed film is "negative", or reversed color.
A DIGITAL IMAGE SENSOR attempts to work the same way as how the crystals on traditional film are CHEMICALLY ALTERED when exposed to light.
Think of the sensor as that film that lies behind that rectangular hole in a film camera, but in a much smaller size, and instead of "crystals" that get exposed to light at a microscopic scale, you have little teeeny tiny squares, one for EVERY PIXEL, that are each recording data for the amount of exposure to light, and the color of that light, among other information (color has temperature and tint as well as exposure, there are lots of variables).
So instead of developing a piece of FILM to remove MICROSCOPIC CRYSTALS to give a perfect image, a sensor is reciving pixel-to-pixel information, and a computer chip is processing the value of every one of those pixels.
Clear explanation
Linus! A Topic for you!
Can you PLEASE make a comparison once and for all about what the big differences are between DLP and LCD Projectors!? I am really stuck as to which type of projector has the least amount of input lag as possible (for gaming of course). Can you please settle this?
Thank you so much for your consideration.
1:53
Anyone notice the 2 in the bottom right?
hax0r
The voice cracking at the start of this video makes me love it all the more
Nigga I'm leaving here even more confused about image sensors.
Linus isn't a "nigga". Go back to World Star HipHop, and making Vines.
Garrett Bradley Kinda racist Not all black people are on World Star hip hop or vine
Garrett Bradley
You must be disconnected from the world if you think black people are the only people using "nigga" lol.
Itaku I NEVER SAID THEY WERE BLACK
"Nigga" mean some who a black person
I've heard from some a few years ago that the extreme enthusiasts only use film because of it's pure nature. I wonder how true that is or will be as the digital photo process get's so much better than it was.
On a similar topic I think you should cover RAW image capture and its benefits/drawbacks compared to using the camera's processing to create JPEGs
jpegs are compressed image. RAW has the best quality.
I know the difference, I think it would just be helpful and interesting to many others
I must admit I haven't read any of his articles. I am interested on what this 'bullshit' is that you are calling him out for?
MrTitskie His site is probably the most visited photography website on the internet, he reviews everything. And with that much traffic he tells people that JPEG is better than RAW despite RAW being better in every way and by far, he tells people to shoot in auto mode, or P mode, which he actually believes stands for "professional", and a whole bunch of other stupid shit, he's basically just a dad with a camera that got lucky with traffic and now he's capable of spreading stupidity and terrible advice to millions.
oBLACKIECHANoo maybe you should go back and read his reviews a little more thoroughly...
Well, he just predicted computational photography a few tears early! Fun!
NTFS VS FAT32
PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEASE
YES PLEASE!
Fat32 is older and supports 4GB files max. NTFS is for windows, but supports files bigger than 4GB
How about popular file systems in general?
or general file systems like hfs+ NTFS EXFAT and FAT32 and FAT(16)
+Hassan Qandil NTFS vs EXT4 vs Btrfs vs ZFS vs the one made by a murderer?
those subtle background noises that are intended to mimic 'computing sounds' drive me crazy
Not one of his best videos. Quality has improved significantly over the years.
Linus... as much as I love you (being the 14th that you published it), I have to disagree: CCD technology USED to have lower noise at specifics ISOs, specially lower ones. Which for most professional photography types, is needed most. But things have changed in the last 8 years. CMOS sensors have reached the same level of noise at low ISOs, while retaining greater IQ in the high ISOs, as they have better signal amplifiers, and specially since the convertion to digital has fewer steps, and therefore, less electronic noise is created. Anyway, almost all camera manufacturers have switched by now to CMOS, instead of CCD. Perhaps there are a couple medium format sensors out there that are CCD, but don't expect them to be many.
You guys should name this "Linus-Sebastian-standing-on-a-box-because-he-is-too-short-while-giving-informative-speeches-about-technology-tips"
Dude thanks for saving me in my assignment, I owe you
I remember when i was young and my parents use to keep the camera films in the fridge XD
fantastic exactly what i was looking for
1:48 - Can you spot the Futurama joke?
best explanation of how it works thanks , awaiting iphone 12 max
Excellent explanation.
give our brains a run for their money *Intel jingle* 😂😂😂
haha, he done the opening bit to it, and I just instinctively went "dun dun dun dun" in my brain 😂
always cool to learn something new and add to the bucket of geeky knowledges.
Nerd
Jonnathan R thanks for the complement.
So every picture we take is actually a little technological marvel
its funny that i was serching for"zfs as fast as possible" instead of google it....i like you guyz how you explain points..and mostly how you connect sponsered ad..😃😃
1:53 bottom right corner - nuber 2 in binary code 😉😀😉
3:59 I was disappointed to not hear the rest of the Intel jingle...
3:28 i was wearing hea'phones and I thought I was being hit by a freakin car
I love your video! Very informative!
There's a major difference between CCD and CMOS that linus got very wrong: CCD sensors in most cases have multiple sensor panels stitched together to form one unit, and while it provides a higher overall sharpness, they're less reliable in low light due to the much lower iso efficiancy with noise; whereas a CMOS sensor will be a single panel sensor, which gives it the greater ability in low light as it's only one unit communicating with the cpu. if you try using a CCD sensor in low light vs a CMOS sensor, the CCD still is going to look like swiss cheese by comparison
righteousbae Umm no, the CCD has way less noise than CMOS sensors. They don’t use CCDs in professional astronomical telescopes for no reason you know…
A+ The humor alone is worth watching whether you are a techie or not...
Watched video before posting. Very interesting technology actually.
do a fast as posible about all the different image types please
It was my understanding CCD pixels operate on principles making them closer to photodiodes, gathering electrons and holes, while CMOS image sensor pixels operate by way of the same principle as xerox machines and laser printers, id est the fact photons reduce the static charge of a charged substrate when absorbed by it. I think the charged substrate for CMOS sensors would be capacitors.
A friend of my fathers that use to work at Micron once spoke of the way people noticed dynamic ram chips without their packaging could act like primitive image sensors if you just read the memory addresses before filling all their digits with ones again. Was never very practical because of the spare addresses they print on the dies to replace dead addresses, plus the arrangement of the individual addresses, and the devices making them up, does not lend itself geometrically to putting the image together after getting the values.
I also once found an electronics enthusiasts magazine from somewhere in the eighties with an article in it discussing whether ccd or dynamic ram was going to become the dominant RAM technology. Thought that was interesting...
Beautifully made video, love it
I got so much to learn from you... You're great keep it up
Is this dude currently going through puberty? WTF?! That voice... I can't!
Thanks for the video, do you have a similar video about CSI 1,2 and 3 sensors?
actually ccd should be the one with rolling shutter issues, because with ccd rows are being read out one after another, while cmos reads all rows simultaneously.
The sensor may only be exposed to light for a fraction of a second due to some sort of shutter/electronic shutter, and CMOS may be exposed the entire time it is being processed, because it can be processed faster, i.e. the CMOS sensor does not require a shutter, but the CCD needs one to operate properly, and the shutter that has been installed on the CCD just happens to be better than the CMOS.
Should you put annotations over the "get started" box of the squarespace ad? It's kind of misleading us a bit thinking that "get started" box is clickable when it's not...
Great episode, thanks!
It's official, our brain run on INTEL.
I remember the days when digital cameras were not very common and the internet was not full of photos in the same way as it is today. In those days the digital cameras that did exist were crappy and expensive. I am glad that now a decent one can be had for the same price or even less. I like how smartphones are coming with good cameras. If you ever had an Xperia or similar phone you would know exactly what I mean. I like the way prices keep falling while technology keeps getting better.
That's because they are manufactured in 3rd world countries.
I knew it! "Intel Inside" just meant they wanted to get into my brain!
wait... that tune was catchy... so they already are!
Thanks for clearing that up :)
Great video guys - loved the indepth view and graphics for the CCD v CMOS comparisons. This was definitely a FAP with brains! ...Which is hot.
Loved it thanks Linus
The image sensor in my eye caught my brother and uncle kissing.
love the faze logo on your shirt man
The way this video is presented it would make one think that only CCD sensors have a rolling electronic shutter and only CMOS sensors have a global electronic shutter. The reality is the opposite: most CCD sensors use global shutters and most CMOS sensors use rolling shutters. Good video though.
this video explained all I need to know in a humorous way!
damn squarespace is everywhere these days, I guess their youtube/twitch advertising is helping them a lot
Which image sensor is best for phone and why
Sony vs samsung vs cmos....
Awesome a Quickie lol! Thanks enjoyed it.
Electrodes are CMOS, Tubes are CCD.
hey man we want a modern version
you're awesome linus
Oh good heaven's, I had forgotten about geocities.
Good explanation, Linus. Was hoping for a shout-out to us microscope users when you said "specialized uses for CCD sensors" but oh well.
there's also something called neocities thats works as a replacement, also if you look up achiveteam they have partly archived geocities before it went kill
LOL, most people don't understood a single thing...Now, do you finally get that we consumers, prosumers don't know a shit about nothing...Now, imagine actually coding for all this stuff...that's why a product comparison should not be just about specs... E.g- want a graphics card? Compare fps on the games that YOU want to play. Phones or any other electronics should only be judged on real world performance. There is a lot of stuff that goes into making the phone even with the same SOC. For more detailed reviews go to AnandTech's or similar websites. On TH-cam, linus is the only one that I keep getting back to.
Please do a video on how baby lamas learn to walk when they are born
I had no idea that I have lived long enough to have seen the sphinx
What is the difference between UTP and FTP cable?
Please make a video on what are Cuda cores and Cuda acceleration?
Great explanation! The question that I have is on the comparison of ccd vs cmos. You had mentioned that ccd is better in low light over cmos. The issue I have with this comparison is that in most digital cameras (i.e. a Leica M using CCD and a Nikon DSLR using cmos) the ccd cameras have moved over to cmos sensors in consumer/commercial applications due to cmos having better low light capability by the way of increasing the sensors sensitivity know as ISO. In a CCD sensor this sensitivity increase "cap" is typically much lower before you start to product unwanted noise in the resulting image. This is why Leica cameras (even though very expensive yet product great images) have a much lower ISO rating than most entry level/consumer DSLR cameras of today that use Cmos. Were you referring to the CCD sensors having better noise handling at lower sensitivity (ISO) ratings compared to a CMOS sensor, at the same ISO? Im just curious on this. Thanks!
Correction... I meant to say Leica m9 and under. The new Leica M uses a cmos sensor now.
What a great video!
have you just seen the 2 in the binary code ?
I'm dating a Photographer, and I hate people taking pictures vs enjoying the concert... Put down your cell phone, and stop recording it's shitty audio and enjoy the show. I sound like a frumpy old man.
But what if the audio is good?
Nah I agree. I'm a photographer too, but my camera never enters a concert, play or anything like that. I think it's disrespectful to take pictures and film it unless you're on staff. Just enjoy it and keep it as a memory.
Agreed. Especially when the concert is being professional shot and you can watch THAT video online for free. Search for jimmy kimmel live and look at all the concert videos from last year. Every other person has their camera/cell phone recording. It's ridiculous.
dude fuck that. happiness is only real when shared and memory's are the most important things to have so why not create these memory's so you can store and share them forever?
lol try recording with lumia 1520
at least it doesn't matter much if you learn't anything from this unlike iso, shutter priority, and aperture priority, the dots spec is so simple
Thank for explaining, besides, i'm ukrainian user and i like this channel realy
Ok, just finished watching the video..........what the hell was Linus talking about again?
image quality in respect to image sensors is affected more by sensor size, more than resolution. for instance, a 50MP medium format camera will be more detailed and sharper than a 50MP full frame or apsc camera. kinda disappointed linus didnt talk about the sensor size part of the equation since its one of the most important factors of an image sensor.
You cannot deal without both datas. A 50mp medium format will be as sharper as 50mpx FF. The advantage of medium format in that case is pixel density. With the same image's resolution, the Medium Format is better in low light and in dynamic range
A question about the sensor.
Which one is better and offers the better image quality?
1/2.5" Progressive Scan CMOS
1/2" Progressive Scan CMOS
1/1.8" Progressive Scan CMOS
3 years later, but it's the 1/1.8" one. The bigger the sensor, the better (1÷1.8 is bigger than 1÷2.5)
i have canon 1100d , while capturing pictures, picture is not clear and has lots of noise.. will changing new sensor make my photo quality better??
Thanks!
1:53 My OCD is tingling on that "2" at the bottom right corner.
LMAO at that intel inside on our brain pic :v
"well, even if you didn't the answer is image sensors" haha I can't stop laughing omg lol
What's a 20mp sensor for when 4k is 8.3mp? Thank you
So for mobile phones, are CCD or CMOS used? Because i bought a cheap phone and it says it has a CMOS sensor and i dont know if thats a good thing for a phone or not.
CMOS, all of them. But the tech says nothing about all other parameters that matter way more.
Could you explain the difference between the Bayer/Foveonx3 filters?
There should be a video about file compression. Like zip, rar, and those other lovely containers.
There are plenty of those you clearly haven't been looking very hard.
In some circumstances i prefer Film over Digital photography, mainly in landscape photography. My Large Format camera far exceeds any Digital Camera in terms of Resolution, And it exceeds most in image quality. Only downside is it takes a few hours before a image is taken (not the exposure time). But if i use digital, i use CDD cameras. (and yes, CCD DSLR's exist)
CCD cameras haven't been around for years. What camera do you use? Have it occurr to you that it may be a reason for that? Large format cameras have advantages... true. But it's not like the final IQ is better, if you may be able to do several exposures, and process 16 bit RAW. Or even... have you tried shooting at ISO 3200 with the Pentax 645Z? There is absolutely no way a LF camera could even get close to that. It's over Kodak. Accept it.
Alan Schamber
The CCD has been around a long time now, it was invented back in 1969. And speaking from experience, CCD cameras have beaten all my CMOS based cameras, in Astrophotography. In normal photography i use a Sony A350, as well as a Sony A6000. Both are good cameras, if you know how to use them. Also to you statement of LF vs. MF vs 35mm, in every test i have done my LF camera exceeded even digital MF cameras such as the Hasselblad H4D39 in image quality, dynamic range (just barley though, it also depends on the film), and resolution. Granted it takes a Drumscanner to actually achieve this. Also i use both Kodak- and Fuji Film. Shooting film is just different then digital, it does not forgive any mistakes, and that is good training for Photography. Oh, and BTW the Pentax 645D dose not go up to ISO3200 it maximum ISO is 1600. Also based on what i know about the Pentax 645D, its image quality is not all to impressive compared to a Hasselblad or a Phase One.
Alan Schamber
Also you truely belive that a little Pentax 645D can outperform a 8x10" LF camera using Kodak Ektar 100, or Fujifl Velvia 50? As well as, say a Rodenstock Sironar-S Lens. in that configuration the camera is unbeatable. And yes, i have seen professional photographers use this in thair work. I talked to a guy doing a Building image of a local company, and he had the fallowing camera: Nikon D800 with a wide angle lens. Phase One MF digital back on a 4x5 LF body. And a 8x10 using film (cant remember the model). Both LF cameras had Rodenstock Lenses. I asked him why he had these exact cameras, he told me that the 8x10 is needed due to its resolution and image quality. As the Client wants large prints at high resolution. The other cameras are used to create a "backup" of the 8x10s film images. Just in case the film gets damaged. The D800 was used to capture from another perspective for a Catalog. Also have you even shot a image with the Pentax 645D? Because to me it sounds like you have not.
First.... I talked about the 645Z. You are outdated. Secondly... the Sony A6000 is a CMOS camera. Third: film is the one that has more forgiveness to give, unless you shoot with a positive one. You cannot recover a RAW file for even 20% you can recover negative film. And yes... CCD cameras have been used for a long time. But in recent years, CMOS have taken all the market. Even LEICA. Yep... even them. So please, read.
After reading the second comment... here it goes... I'll just copy and paste my first comment. I have ALREADY answered you that:
"Large format cameras have advantages... true. But it's not like the final IQ is better, if you may be able to do several exposures, and process 16 bit RAW. Or even... have you tried shooting at ISO 3200 with the Pentax 645Z? There is absolutely no way a LF camera could even get close to that. It's over Kodak. Accept it."
Large format cameras have advantages, IF they are shooting something really specific. But the real reason that photographer was shooting with that configuration, is because large format can shift the film, with no need for a tilt- shift lens, which is quite expensive. Welcome to the pro's world.
what about OIS, BSI and any similar to these two?
Greetings.
Could you help me to get the IMX179 datasheet?
Do CCDs have a “rolling shutter” problem?
Why is there more green on digital? And why was blue more common on film/analog? Curious to know since I'm into Sci-Fi (use of blue screens and green screens)
no explanation of the sensor size number and other jargons?
How do red sensors differ from other wavelength sensors?
why cmos have lower noise in slr camera
This video misleads all the point. The CCD sensor are historically less expensive to produce than the CMOS (Read any digital photography book). The CCD sensor needs less power than the CMOS due to the sensor layers: CCD reads light through a RGB Bayer Colour Filter (25%R + 25%G + 50%B) that is why you will find them on phone cameras, compact cameras or in the first digital cameras. While the CMOS has 4 sensor layers to each one of the RGB Colour (100%R + 100%G + 100%B) and you will prefer to have them on DSLRs cameras due to fullframe, more colour space with bigger processors and RAW formats. :)