VFX Artists React to Resurrected Actors Bad & Great CGi
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ต.ค. 2024
- CONSIDER SUBSCRIBING ► bit.ly/Subscrib...
Watch Season 4 From The Beginning ► • Studio Cleanup Turns I...
This Episode ►
Wren, Clint, and Niko react to the best and worst examples of deceased actors being resurrected through CGI!
THE GEAR WE USE ►
Most Used Equipment: bit.ly/Corridor...
Perfect Camera: bhpho.to/2FJpQmR
Puget Systems Computers: bit.ly/PC_Puget...
SUPPORT US ►
Translate & Subtitle: bit.ly/Make_SUB...
Patreon Donation: bit.ly/_Corrido...
Buy Merch: bit.ly/Corridor...
FOLLOW US ►
Instagram: bit.ly/_Corrido...
Sub-Reddit: bit.ly/_Corrido...
Subscribe to our Gaming Channel, NODE: bit.ly/Subscrib...
![[UNCUT]"ตุลามรณะ"ย้อนฟังคำทำนาย หมอดูทุกสาย ดวงเมืองร้อน (หมอปลาย ฟองสนาน อ.โอเล่)I คนดังนั่งเคลียร์](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/lE5az5VvT9M/mqdefault.jpg)
Thanks for watching er'body! If you want to watch this entire show from the beginning you can do that here ►
th-cam.com/video/_4WrKeoeZhk/w-d-xo.html
Seeing a pinned comment with 0 likes is so weird… along with the fact it was posted 3 years later
I now
erybody
Legally, speaking your face is public domain. It’s kinda the workaround after the San Bernardino incident.
The FBI want an easy back door into iPhones but Apple wouldn’t compromise security. Instead, they put in finger and Face ID.
If a person is arrested they have the right to remain silent, so they don’t have to tell the police the passcode to their phone. But your face and fingerprints aren’t protected as such. You can remain silent (or be dead), but they can unlock you phone
This episode needs a revisit with newer examples to see if it's gotten better.
I was one of the artists on the sopranos job. It was a nightmare.
These guys were pretty accurate in their assumptions as to why it looked so weird- yes we had to flip her head horizontally to make it work in some shots and not in others, yes we knew the lighting made no sense. But there was nothing we could do!
We were given a bunch of body parts and told to Frankenstein it all together into the final sequence.
Please bear in mind it was 20 years ago and the tech has evolved hugely since then, yet even now it is super hard to do.
The other artist and I were under 25 at the time and working 16 hours a day for a month.
Sorry guys, we tried our best with the tools and materials we were given!
I forgive you dude!!! Obviously it’s difficult to do for a movie let alone a television series!!! Y’all only had a month and that is definitely not enough time!!! Especially with the tech from 20 years ago
gabagool
I'm watching The Sopranos right now and I gotta say I didn't notice that Livia was CGI at first. You did your best, man, good job.
RIP Nancy Marchand
Ive watched the sopranos and didn’t notice … only found out right now. You only really notice it when you know what to look for
Like others have said, I never noticed. I've watched this whole series countless times and I never knew she was CG for that scene. Kudos to you guys, you guys did fantastic given the time frame and the tech you had! :)
At the end of this series they'll reveal that everyone on the couch is CGI.
I wrote a comment like this only to discover this...
Iiro Tähkä whoa! Me too😱😱😱
Guy in the middle is definitely a copy of the dude from Entourage.
This... Would be epic! But I doubt the would put the effort because of reasons and money
@@rafaelferes4362 What do you mean money? Why would they need money to make the couch CGI?
Please react to de-aging actors CGI
Or aging up actors CGI or both
(the Corridor Crew had a heart on this, briefly, before I edited this for the first time.. oops)
maybe changing body types as well (e.g. skinny chris evans in "CA:TFA," young and chubby dwayne "the rock" johnson in "Central Intelligence")
Young Nick Fury breakdown would be sick
old captain america would be a great one from endgame
YES, RDJ, Sam Jackson, Kurt Russell, Benjamin Button
I was just about to say
Fun fact: the cast they had of Peter Cushing came from the film Top Secret, directed by the guys who made Airplane and Naked Gun. The reason they had a cast of his head is because they had a visual gag where he is looking through a magnifying glass and his eye is super big, but when he puts down the glass, his eye still super big because they put a giant eye on his face
This series is really blowing up, great job guys!
I’m addicted to these videos
they're so pumped about VFX, its infectious
Do the flash fight scenes
I love these videos... kinda worried you guys aren't getting any work done anymore lol
They deserve it!
They inspired us to make our our helicopter movie scene react video: th-cam.com/video/cRAah_7pENs/w-d-xo.html
This VFX react series is such a good idea. Please continue it guys. Great work!
Easier than this, get a body double then utilize DEEPFAKE
Yesss keep going!
Can't agree more. Always love the insight and please know they are great
They actually ruin movies for me
Please do not stop making these, this my favorite series
These guys are very good at VFX, but one thing they are even better at is TH-cam, they understand they got a winning series on their hands, you can bet your ass we'll get one of these vids each week for at least the rest of 2019
I love these!!
forreal, never seen any of their other vids but i fucking love these
oh you know they won't. the previous videos of this series are top 15 in views
I actually assumed Paul Walker had shot all those scenes before he died and they only did the one car scene in CG. Pretty fantastic!
I don't know... the scene at 1:52 looks pretty bad to me. And in most of them he looks like something out of a Quantic Dream video game. The first one they showed is by far the best (despite the shortcomings they pointed out), and it makes sense given the background they also provided.
Granted, I also don't know that there's anything better than that, so it was likely a great attempt with what they had to work with.
The others looked bad but I thought Paul Walker was very tastefully done
I love how these videos aren't just entertaining, but you legit learn so much watching it too. It's like the chill out couch version of Digital Foundry
Yo Gehab what up I love your videos mate ❤️🤘
I know right, I'm learning a lot from this series as an artist myself. It's great! Entertaining and enlightening
Edutainment
Corrider is the reason I can't watch movies anymore >_>;
yeah, I learned to sing watching this video
“Bruce Lee looks like that one guy from Tekken”
Oh the one modeled after Bruce Lee?
BR33CH HD you’re so cool
"Only Tekken did it better..."
@@SKNYmusik He was just pointing out that young people today don't know that literally EVERYTHING in the 21st century is trite and derivative, bordering on plagiarism. The truth hurts, as they say.
To me only their screams sound similar not their body
Sodium Ruto tekken is exaggerated so I agree 100%
PLEASE compare The Lord of The Rings to the Hobbit. The scene in Moria with Gandalf vs the Balrog is something I want you to talk about.
Lucianno Luuk Becerra YES!
Or just after they leave and that dreadful digital double shot of the remaining companions sliderunwalking down the mountain.
I had trouble understanding the geography of the Balrog & Bridge scene. Is that what you mean?
@@johnthomson9614 I was referring on the Balrog itself. Because light is being emitted from within him, he has a flaming sword and whip, Idk, something along those lines. The geography of that confused me aswell. "The bridge is near" says gandalf. Cut to a shot of the bridge being a mile away or so. Filling in the blanks myself, I'm guessing the stairs that twirled downward led to a tunnel that goes back in and curves left (or right) to where the bridge is located. We just didn't see the tunnel. I THINK, can't say it's accurate.
This is incredible. I will say this much... I saw Rouge One in theaters, and afterwards I had no idea there was CG character in the movie.
I coudnt tell either... but maybe it's just because I have bad eye sight XD
Same, I just saw it, came here because I wanted to see how they made Carrie Fisher. I would never have thought Peter Cushing was CGI
“Rouge One”, with that misspelling sounds like a movie about makeup.
You didn't know Peter Cushing was dead? He's been gone since like 94..
watch more corridor videos to learn how they make cg shots
For me it was that Tarkin's forehead was too glossy. The other guy in the scene reflected the light in a matted way. But Tarkin looked like a waxed hardwood floor.
Tarkin and leia Look so like plastic
His head turned before his body
He moved like a robot
For me, it was the eyes. They literally looked animated.
In my opinion the biggest sin was trying to push him into clearer views. Cut his screentime in half, and make him always in shadow. Get your money shot as still as you can, maybe as a silent reaction.
React to DC digitally removing Henry Cavil’s mustache in Justice League!!
And Gal Gadot's armpit hair (they did that, right?)
I'm pretty sure stills from the movie where Henry still has his mustache have been leaked. They'll help for the direct comparison.
Nathan Locke no
They already did
@Ms. Kuchisaké Delusional boy...
What I wanna know is WHY WAS HENRY CAVILL’S UPPER LIP SO DEMONIC
it were reshots when he had already grown a mustache for another movie that he could not shave, so they edited it
on top of what Max said, you can find videos of regular people doing a better editing job of the mustache cover up than what the massive company did.
I heard a rumor that a VFX company was hired at the last moment during the reshoots to CGI away his mustache and only had two weeks to do the job, which had to be done frame by frame. Supposedly that's why it looks so bad.
except you already know that.
@@Barbaroossa
So basically you have smartasses who brag about how they can edit a moustache better on a single frame. While the VFX company had two weeks to edit a 3 hours movie at roughly 24 or 50 fps (didn't watch the movie but it's a wild guess based on US standards) ?
Damn. Internet sure is full of retards
I think movie stars need to include in their living will and final directives whether they want their likeness resurrected. We know that studios and some family members will just see dollar signs, but some stars may want their characters to retain continuity in whatever way a director can do it. I think it's reached that level at this point.
This can of course work, as dark as it might be to ask someone the question if they want to be included if they died. In the case of Paul Walker though it was so unexpected and sudden that they couldn‘t have possibly predicted it. I think in those cases you would need to ask the family and take into consideration what you think the actor would‘ve wanted. Paul Walker loved his role and I am 100% sure he would love what was done with his character. I am sure though that there are other actors that hate their role and wouldn’t want to be „revived“ for a movie
Todays actors will probably be able to give consent, but older actors can’t.
The dad in back to the future solved this.
Please do
Blade Runner 2049 (rachael)
Forrest Gump (legs, feather)
Captain America: The First Avenger (face and body swap)
Rachael is the best realistic CG face I've ever seen. Logan was pretty damn good too. Those two, at least in my opinion, went beyond the uncanny
I second Rachel
Please do Rachel. That shot in the movie was incredible!
Yeah. I am a total noob but Rachel looked really good. Would love to watch you guys talk about that one
Keep doing these series! Very insightful :)
Indeed -Teal'c
Carrie Fisher’s Deepfake was not that perfect, the mouth didn’t say hope, it looked like she said “hohhu”
I know. I don't get why the guy sitting in the middle is spazzing out over it: "WOW. That looks WAY better!!!"
They both look pretty fake to me.
But don't forget that you have a dream
"What was it they gave us?"
"Hohhu."
". . . Excuse me?"
One is a deepfake, the other is a CGI production from a billion dollar company. Maybe that's why they are impressed dumbasses?
Dark Reaper but they said that looks better therefore suggesting it was better not simply impressive
When I saw Rogue One in the theater, I hadn't heard they'd used CGI for Tarkin. I thought they'd found a decent doppelganger and then tried too hard on the makeup or something. Went home and immediately watched A New Hope (because that's what you do after seeing Rogue One the first time) and seeing the real Tarkin again really made it click.
Also. Carrie Fisher passed away THE DAY before I saw that movie. So seeing her at the end, in an end sequence which was already spectacular, sent me over the top emotionally.
Plot twist:
Those three guys are actually completely CGI
That is the ultimate lesson. We were looking so closely at what they wanted us to see that we didn't see what was right in front of us the whole time.
It would take them months to make it CGI and for those details i think its even more.. But I guess it would be great
Lol
Yeah they should do a video of one of them in CGI and halfway through he starts to glitch and gradually become worse xD
What an original comment, I don't see this on any other one of their videos at all!
Can you do a video on CGI animals? all the way from the original Jumanji to the more recent Lion King.
Thats a great idea
Hope they do it
Yes that'd be very interesting
Based on the trailers for Lion King I think it looks like they did an incredible job making the animals look real. However, I think they’re so real that they lack the emotion and human-like characteristics that can be easily expressed with drawn cartoons.
Don't forget the cgi deer from The Walking Dead Season 7 Episode 12: "Say Yes". The deer Rick is looking at when he's on the Ferris Wheel.... Even a layman like me could tell it was so bad. The sun light is on it's right side but the left side is still lit up like a spotlight... th-cam.com/video/KPxTVJWkbX4/w-d-xo.html Worst fake animal I've EVER seen that wasn't intentionally supposed to be cheesy (*cough* syfy channel movies *cough*).
Also Mowgli
React to "The Lord of The Rings" CGI vs "The Hobbit" CGI.
please
Hobbit cgi is far better. Only difference, lotr used mainly practical effects and rarely cgi, only if they needed to. Hobbit however used mainly cgi and less practical effects.
@@voidling2632 I agree, just wanted to see their take on the shiny models and stuff and how the methods have changed over time.
@kshamwhizzle It's like with Jurassic Park. The CG is far more advanced in a technical sense in the Hobbit but in Lord of the Rings its far more cleverly handled.
Misanthrope the cgi for Azog in the hobbit is pretty bad, Smaug is great tho
For me it's those digital works being both too stiff, and something missing in the eyes.
Something is always off about the motion and I wonder if it's some refresh rate thing. Grand Moff Tarkin looks gummy to me too.
"between the nose, above the chin"
like... the mouth?
It's kinda fun that they would say that as people who know about this stuff and then I'm sitting here as a regular Jo, going it wasn't the eyes and forehead? To me it looks like the CGI team miss matched with the actor and fell behind so that her eyes kinda drag up into possession too late.
And the other things between the nose and chin.
1k likes!!!
Philtrum probably
I'm pretty sure he said more than that, and not referring to the mouth
Rachel from Blade Runner 2049 is probably the best I've seen so far
Yes! That was way perfect than Rogue One technique. There are tons of movies with all these special effects secrets. Blade Runner 2049 is one of the best productions of all time.
It was so perfect I couldn't tell it was cgi.
True. If I hadn't known that the actress (Sean Young) should have aged 35 years, I'd never have guessed it wasn't her.
Man, every CG in that movie is frickin flawless!
nah her face was lifeless. The mouth and eyes look weird in conjunction with the rest of the face. Like what these guys were talking about all the small things that go on when your face moves. It is painfully obvious with Rachel too. At least in my opinion.
Guardians of the Galaxy vol 2?
The Kurt Russel deaging was amazing.
It was also mostly makeup. His makeup artist he’s used for decades told the production team “Hey, I can probably cut a few decades off of him with makeup alone” and they just went from there.
Seeing them react to mostly of Marvel's deaging actors would be awesome. The deaging of Michael Douglas and Michel Pffeifer was amazing too, in my opinion.
De-aging Samuel Jackson in Captain marvel was probably the best to date.
@@veggiet2009 I agree. Marvel does an incredible job deaging their actors, the most mindblowing thing is that they deaged The Original Six when they appear in New York's Battle in Avengers:Engame
But the old Cap was all makeup, wasn't it? Has to be some of the best aging makeup to date.
Peter crushing "who died some time ago" like 20+ years ago
20 years ago is sometime ago.
imagine if stan lee filmed like 20 scenes for future marvel movies
I’d be getting hella emotional for about 5 seconds for the next 20 years
@@baileys5673 well he did so take paper tissues
Oh pretty please
He did film a couple in advance but not many
Rest in peace, stan lee...
I need yall to react to actors being digitally made young. Captain Marvel (although I know you already did, but maybe another scene) Ant Man, Endgame, Civil War, Terminator, and the Irishman when it comes out. Maybe a few more!
Edit: Great suggestions!
Yess! I was going to say that!!
Yessssss
I need them to wait until Gemini Man comes out (Will Smith movie) they make him look Fresh Prince young and its pretty damn good. Check out the trailer
Don't forget Tron Legacy
and Logan
CGI animals: The Lion King vs Aslan from Narnia
Also Sherkan and Raja as an extra comparison
I still don't get how they are allowed to call pretty much a CGi only movie "live action"..!
Don't forget about The Jungle Book(2016) from Disney vs Netflix's Jungle Book
@Norman still, couldn't it be called 'realistic 3D animation' or something instead? It'd be honest..!
Pear soda was forced to be renamed "soda with pear flavour" here in Norway, and CGI is even less real so :/
I'm waiting for the episode where they cgi themselves onto the couch and wait for us to notice
These "VFX Artists React to" videos are so good! Please continue doing these! 🙏
I hope they more of these, these are literally my favorite series to watch
Same
you guys should do a review/reaction of Avatar, Godzilla, King Kong, World of Warcraft, and Alita.
All great cgi
yaaas the new WoW cinematics, they're beautiful
Alita is nuts in my honest opinion
psssst also if ur readin this corridor do love death and robots. That show has some seriously good cgi
In the sopranos scene the actress playing Olivia passed away very unexpectedly days before filming started for the season. Which quickly became a writing nightmare since she was such a big part of the story. If you watch the season she doesn't appear or is mentioned in the first episode of the season because they had to buy time for this scene of her to be made, which appears in the second episode.
The reason why it looks so bad is because 1 they were rushed, but also because all of the head shots were from previous scenes in the previous seasons, which all had different lighting and shot from different angles.
Also if you watch the scene the dialogue is very strange too because they had to write it so the things that she said in the shots made sense for the conversation.
They did the best they could with what they had. But man it looks bad.
I am just now getting around to watching the Sopranos and had a really strange hunch that the actress had died when first viewing the scene. It was so strange to be able to predict her character's death minutes before it happened because of VFX. Didn't put the pieces together until I went to the actress's wikipedia page and saw how they had to write the story around her death. Felt like something I could only experience by binging a 20-year-old show lol
RUSE - Official Same here. As soon as I saw that scene I was like “uh oh...”
I do remember an interview on Fresh Air where someone involved in the Soprano's production discussed that Nancy Marchand informed the show of her cancer diagnosis and the show asked her to keep acting in it as long as she could or wished to.
They forgot to try deepfakes
Даниил Горбунов waaaaaaay before deep fakes were a thing.
Must have been hard for the walker brothers to play there brother after he died
Not too hard he did itn
@@BenHereb-sonOfthesword what are you saying
@@callumclarke9384 he speakin hebrew
@@callumclarke9384 hebrew man
my new compliment to someone is now "you have a good subsurface scattering"
My reply would be “Thanks. The small muscular movements around your mouth help you not look like a creepy robot”
LMAO
The ambient light on your face highlights the reddish tone on your nose haha
And people who don't understand will be "a what now?"
Or "nerd"
I would say: go away cortana, you are drunk.
You could break down
-Pacific Rim (2013)
-Transformers (2007)
-Star Trek (2009)
Pacific Rim had AMAZING CGI
@@lessalazar9068 one of the best to this day. There's not one flaw with it. The physics were also right in that. Everything felt like they weighed millions of tonnes and every hit had impact, every swing took time. And the scenes in the rain and in the ocean were jaw droppingly good. I have a 15GB blu ray version of it.
Yes! And maybe the new Godzilla
I read Star Trek as Shrek
It is not really resurecting, but Rachel from Blade Runner in Blade Runner 2049 was an excellent CGI face.
And it was hand animated too, like omg
Yeah, that really was impressive.
It was hands down the best attempt at a CGI face to date. It was helped by the fact that she doesn't talk much, but still, it's flawless imo.
Yeah, that was real good. One thing Id say is she looked slightly puffy
I still could tell something was off but she's a cgi trying to be a human acting as a hyper real cyborg. So really it's just extremely convoluted at that point lololol
RE: CGI Tarkin
Quite apart from the achievements and / or failings of the digital rendering, and despite all the lengths the artists went to to assure they had as photo-realistic likeness as they could get; they fell flat by the omission of one of the single most distinctive "human" touches Peter Cushing was known for - the finger raised for emphasis.
Look at any film where Cushing is playing an authority or emphatically making a point and you will find it - that finger visually punctuating his words. From Dracula to Frankenstein to the original Star Wars itself (hell, even the animators of the cartoon series used it!); you could make a drinking game out of how many times he wagged that finger in the air - and yet it was so glaringly, painfully missing from CGI Tarkin. In fact, in most of his scenes, his hands are resolutely immobile or clasped behind his back.
I was seriously disappointed that so familiar a Cushing trademark had been neglected.
Guy Henry gives a very somnolent performance compared to what Peter Cushing would give. And then the animators tried to bring it close to Cushing facially, which creates a disconnect between the voice and the face.
Do I own my face? Nah, pretty sure I signed that away when I got Snapchat.
In all seriousness, great video. Really provocative questions and analysis.
Christopher Davidson God wants you to have a relationship with him! It was very loving of Him to come to earth as Jesus and live the life we should have lived and died the deserve we deserved. Some say "why doesnt God just wipe out all the evil in the world?" But people dont realize that would include them too if they do not have the blood of Christ covering their sins. His judgment is just and warranted because of evil in this world, but He provided a way of redemption for us through the sacrifice Jesus Christ made for us on the cross. God is patient with mankind. According to 2 Peter 3:9, " ...He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance."
@@charlie4christ536 why you bringing religion in this video?
UwU well that escalated
@@charlie4christ536 dude this is why people hate religion
Charlie4Christ I’m sorry but what.
"YOU NEVER SEEN THE SOPRANOS?" says the guy who never watches half the movies he's commenting about ^_^
Exactly lol
That's kinda the joke duud
I have never heard of the Sopranos until literally now
@@howtomusic5157 It was a very successful tv show in america.
Leonidas Well that explains why I've never heard of it (because I don't live in America)
Sopranos - She died unexpectedly. The shot was slapped together last minute using archive footage because they were so pressed to meet production schedule. She died in-universe immediately after that scene.
What do you know? 4 years later, Niko's question whether an actor should own the likeness of their face is an actual issue right now in Hollywood.
Do actors that were digitally de-aged in movies. Like Kurt Russel in Guardians of the galaxy
Or now Will Smith from Gemini Man
Jeff Bridges in Tron Legacy
Sam Jackson in Captain Marvel
@@1Latettaja1 they did it :D
Benjamin Rood
Are you serious? It looks amazing for 2011 if it’s completely cgi...
this VFX artists react to * series is quickly becoming one of my favourite shows on TH-cam
Needs to be louder FeelsGoodMan Clap
Reaaly like that guy on the right.
Everyone loves Niko
This comment needs more likes so they could always make this series
this VFX artists react to * guy in the middle is really corny
Can you react on movies that won oscar for visual effects. Just an insight on how these movies in your opinion won or does these movies deserved to have the award. Thank you! Fan from Philippines
As a non professional when I saw Tarkin for the first time in theaters I was completely amazed by it. True when you focus and can pause the movie, zoom etc. you can complain on little details but when you're carried by the moment and action of the movie it was for me really realistic. Bravo to the team who did it
You should react to CG Monsters! From Pacific Rim to 90s Godzilla theres a lot to break down.
Yeah I made another comment here as well, would be cool to compare 2014 Godzilla with the new one, but maybe also some other monster movies like 1998 Godzilla, Pacific Rim and Cloverfield. I feel like Godzilla 2014 was the only one that really convincingly showed the scale of the monsters (and maybe Cloverfield too) and I'd like to see them explain how that was achieved.
Someone has HAD to have suggested this already , but- LOTR vs Hobbit CGi
Musikality unfortunately the hobbit is almost entirely CGI whereas LOTR had so many costumes and makeup. The orcs took up to 12 hours and there were hundreds of extras; in the hobbit the orcs were all cgi and its such a shame!
Yes please!
They already spoke about it in another video
Let's just say it like this, the Lord of the Rings looks amazing with all of its 'real looking' orcs, while the Hobbit looks like a video game
LOTR still looks fantastic with some small exceptions. I've recently rewatched the trilogy on blu-ray and noticed that in some panoramic shots 3D models of actors are sometimes floating above the ground and have pretty basic animation by today's standards. But boy, does everything else looks cool, perfect blend of practical effects and CGI.
me : Ahahhaa yeah yeah the lighting!
also me : *whispering* WHAT'S WRONG WITH THE LIGHTING?
Everytime an expert has a different opinion than me lol
The Sopranos one was obvious but the rest are all fine details that normies like us wouldn't _really_ notice
@@theonlycatonice Many are super obvious . You can tell by how the face moves. Many are unnatural.
@@theonlycatonice many are pretty obvious but laymen like us can't tell what is wrong we just know that something is wrong.
A lot of things they point out make sense after they have brought attention to it. Before that I can just tell that it looks off but not necessarily why
I just want to say I’ve become absolutely obsessed with this channel and this series and it’s all I watch at this point. Just wanted to thank you guys for working so hard, being so informational, and consistently putting out top quality content 🙏🏼🙏🏼
Note.
1.Make CGI face
2.Motion capture
3.render lighting
4.render texture
5.finalize
Then DEEP FAKE
Wth is deep fake
Patrick Edwards It's a CGI technology for putting people's faces on other people's bodies. It became infamous for inserting celebrity faces in pornographic movies and passing it off as if the real celebrity had made that pornographic video. Very hard to tell from the real thing unless you recognize the original footage that was edited.
@@johnfrancisdoe1563 It is somewhat different from normal CGI technology as it is created by AI. Hence the name "deep" fakes (it is generated by deep neural networks)
@@patrickedwards2078 Don't Google it
@@wessltov Or google it, who cares
The eyes on derpfakes Carrie Fisher freak me out
She looked like a bobblehead
It reminded me of movies from the 60's - early 70's when high res video wasn't a thing, and contrast seemed higher.
Her eyes actually move up before her head does, it's really fuckin weird.
alan met Garreth Edwards sucks ass
that scene still scares me bruh
Movie :Rampage
Dwayne Johnson jumps out of plane.. parachute.. his face😂😂looks like a ps2 game😂
@@ChrisGunnFilms ahh... So true... So very true... I mean, that scene with him being the scorpion just, makes me wish they had an extra few million budget
Part of what killed Cushing/Tarkin's CG believable nature was the constant small motions they had his head make - they were so numerous and so sharply executed, almost staccato to use a musical term (kind of stop-motion-like or slideshow like; very jerky) that it was just obviously not any way that a person would naturally move. If they cut the little head movements in half or even just took 1/3 of them out and made the motion a little smoother, it would have been far more convincing. People don't move like a puppet with a DC Step Motor controlling them; there's motion build-up and inertia that keeps you moving slightly when you try to stop, and they flubbed those aspects completely.
tl;dr: CG Tarkin lacked fluidity in his movements and made too many of them to begin with, and they didn't follow basic physics.
please please react to Henry Cavill's Mustache in Justice League...even just for a little bit!
I'd love seeing you react to Alita and/or Godzilla!
Because they look so good?
Do James Cameron's Avatar and how it changed CGI and motion capture going forward
life before and after avatar?
YES!!!
This would be awesome
As a layperson, I must say I think I'm the only person that when Avatar came out was like "wow Roger Rabbit but as a video game cutscene" ... never found Avatar even remotely interesting or revolutionary
John Carlos right! I watched it and thought it was the stupidest movie I’ve ever seen, never really understood how it’s supposed to be revolutionary
Some actors restrict use of their likeness
Using your example of Tom Cruise, he actually doesn’t allow the use of his face on toys or merchandise, which is why we don’t see mission impossible action figures, or anything similar
Never would have known about the dude in Gladiator, seen that film a few times and never thought anything was off!
You guys have such amazing attention to detail!
You should look at de-aged actors like Kurt Russell in the beginning in Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2
Or like Tony Stark in the beginning of Cpt. America: Civil War at MIT.
Young Hank Pym & old Peggy Carter looked real good. Young Nick Fury too
I want to see Nicole Kidman in Aquaman!
Hank pim from ant man.
sasook if you look back at Peggy Carter I think your opinion might change. Nick Fury looks really great though.
Clint doesn't know StarWars
*Still makes an example with sand*
@@RJFreno He does add the purely objective outsider's perspective, though. What I mean is, he doesn't know these movies, therefore he has zero expectations or preconceived notions about what they're supposed to look like, he's just looking at the effects and deciding if they're good or not based on their own merit regardless of any outside context.
derpyherpes I don’t like sand.
He's fine, he adds enough about the subject in spite of not knowing some of the specific creative examples used. One doesn't need knowledge of a specific creative work to make technical observations.
@@RJFreno Yea, your opinion is "fact" and everyone else in the entirety of the world can't possibly disagree with you without just being "wrong" - we heard you the first time...
@@RJFreno And, all I'm saying is that we already heard you - you disagree with some of us, we got it. Literally nothing is going to change by you continuing to repeat your opinion, but stated as if it's in some way factual. You obviously aren't changing my mind, and it should be obvious why I'm not wasting my time trying to change yours.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I have other people who's opinions I'm also, apparently, s00per d00per upset over(just because I disagree with them, of course) to reply to...
I remember watching Rogue One in theaters and inmediately when I saw that Turkin character I KNEW he wasnt real I told my dad watching with me and he didnt know who I was talking about -- him, the cgi guy!
Not just the lips with Grand Moff Tarken.
He's too Hi-Def compared to everything around him.
You're not gonna see every pore, every wrinkle. You can see those on Tarken, AND Leia
That’s what’s I was thinking when I saw it. Not that it looked bad, it’s obviously beautifully done, but the faces of of the characters in the scene with those 2 characters don’t look as “HD” as the CG characters.
@@TheReySkywalker exactly, and they nailed this with davy jones in dead mans
@@Kalev225 Wren did say that "the less detailed the VFX is, the more realistic it becomes" while he was working on the web in the Spider-Man video during the Vlog where he has to deal with his arachnophobia.
@@thegrayyernaut Also, I feel like many VFX folk are over-animating their subjects; it comes off like "Clone Wars" or any other pure CG animation, where every single tic of the face is something that HAS to be moved for some reason! In real life, we use subtlety, not overt, facial inflections, but I feel like animators in CGI right now are WAY overdoing it. There are parts of Tarkin's eyelids and eyebrows that no human being has ever thought of moving in their lifetime, but they're on overdrive in most of his scenes.
So "less detailed" doesn't just mean the camera's capture, but also the performance. People tend to be called "overacting" very often and here we're pretending our virtual actors are using multiple takes, etc. The result is a young, brilliant computer animator is emoting far too much in a scene using their computer driven character. And we the audience (knowing next to nothing about CGI but EVERYTHING about behaviour at a subconscious level) fall into the uncanny valley. And we have NO idea why, because it looks perfect (and did frame by frame, too).
It's NOT an animation, it's a simulated capture! There MUST be mistakes and lost subtleties, imperfections! It's supposed to be a human performance, and just tweaking that upper eyebrow muscle isn't that! That said, it's a young, and beautiful, technology/art at this point, so I look forward to what comes from it. I frankly love it, I just wish the artists involved realized what was causing the disconnect. Hence me being repetitious and annoying, I apologize. Best wishes everybody, take care!
Its Tarkin with an I, you disrespectful womp rat.
PLEASE react to Love, Death, and Robots! Especially the episode “beyond the Aquila rift”
or anything from Love, Death and Robots
@@RedLoopster For real, I'd love to see them talk about literally anything from that. It's all so good.
That show was amazing!
Of the photoreal episodes I personally felt Lucky 13 had better fidelity than Beyond the Aquila Rift. Perhaps because of the actor likenesses, I don't know, but there was less uncanny valley for me in that one and took me a good second to properly process that it was animated and not some live action composite.
Ali Lightfoot oh yeah I forgot about that one! I agree it’s more realistic!
Henry Cavill's cgied mustache in Justice League?
That is almost universally thought of as really bad CGI. It's a lesson in "How NOT to do CGI effects."
very true
Ahahaha
I personally thought the scenes in Rogue One were good. I never understood why people said it was bad. Even after watching this. With Tarkin, there were moments where it seemed fake, but with Carrie, it was indistinguishable.
But seeing the Deep fake, in this video absolutely shook me, sending tingles up my spine.
“This is someone trying to be Carrie Fisher” - Spot on!
React to Marvel's De-Aging CGI or Guardians Of The Galaxy 1&2 CGI.
Omg the Kurt Russell de aged was insanely good to me. That with Fury and Pym de aged was damn near perfect
80-year-old Captain America was amazing
@@susynbry I actually believe that was almost completely if not completely with makeup and prosethics on Chris Evans.
Monty Natious If I’m not mistaken they used a totally different actor for old Captain America
@@ethanshaffer3036 screenrant.com/avengers-endgame-old-capatain-america-actor-chris-evans/
The Rock, in the Mummy Returns as the Scorpion King. The pinnacle of CGI
Ew please no
I just want to see the revulsion on their faces looool
LMAO
They'd probably just sit completely silent for about 40 seconds then move on.
Lol
12:12 Ask Crispin Glover.
That’s what occurred to me. They should have shown the clip where Glover was used in Back To The Future (2? 3? I forget) and talked about what happened.
@@JackFlashTech It was the second movie, they didn't get Glover back for the sequel for some reason (if I recall correctly, there was a dispute about Glover wanting more money) and so they decided to get another actor in, with prosthetics to make him look like Glover. No CG was used back in 1989 (the technology just wasn't advanced enough), they used a special motion control camera rig (with special film stock too) to film each character separately and then optically lined up all the shots in post production. Nowadays it would all be done with digital compositing.
There was no law at the time to say that you couldn't use an actor's likeness without permission, but due to Glover suing Zemeckis and Universal (the court case in which he won), there is now a clause in the Screen Actors Guild rules saying you have to seek written permission to use an actor's likeness, even if they are dead.
That was the first thing I thought of. There's literally a whole law about likeness because of back to the future lol
Yes, first person I thought of too.
You should do the Oscar winners for best VFX and the razzie “winners” for worst.
YES! That’s a great idea
De-aging the movie characters. Like Jeff Bridges in Tron Legacy and now Will Smith in Gemini Man.
Neeraj Baviskar word and Samuel L. Jackson in Captain Marvel
anthony hopkins in westworld
AND IRON MAN TOO
Why would you even need to de-age will smith? The man hasn't aged since the 90s
Rdj in civil war Michael Douglas in Ant-Man
React to CGI from Doctor Who. CGI in the show has ranged from amazing to downright ugly. Would be interesting to see your insights into a show with a restricted budget and insanly tight vfx deadlines.
Darkduck no
Yes
Omg yes
@@fortunasbiggestfan yesn't
They bought Paul Walker's face to life but forgot to bring his eyes back to life.
R.I.P Princess Leia
“I don’t want my life to imitate art, I want my life to be art” -Carrie fisher 1956-2016
Shawnday Salazar yet she died with a needle in her arm aka crack head fischer
@@HistoryandReviews
Wow. Dark.
@@HistoryandReviews Not funny
@@HistoryandReviews wdym?
lia Manila its not a joke
"His skin seems too firm."
I mean...it's supposed to be Peter Cushing.
Peter Cushion
I'd like to see The Adventures of Tintin (film) reviewed cause it was made using 3D motion Capture.
THISSS
Tarkin looked pretty damn flawless to me, but I'm no expert. If I hadn't known about Peter Cushings passing I would've never known he was digital
Mentioned Stan lee
Me: Breaks down into tears
Bob Dylan 🥺😢
No body cares
@@dead_fish5483 everybody cares
Sarthak Raj I heard the opposite where he was the one being abused. /shrugs
@@sarthakraj3981 they were all debunked
My friends and I use “Tarkin” as a verb to mean to bring back from the dead digitally.
“They’ll have to tarkin Carrie Fisher if they want Leia in Episode 9.”
Love these videos!
Timmy Walczak They’ve already discussed that Leia will be in episode 9 via unused footage Carrie Fisher filmed for episodes 7 & 8 and they’re going to incorporate the footage into the script,yes they’ll be doing a bit of cgi to move her into scenes and remove backgrounds on unused footage. Gonna be interesting to see come Christmas
I'd love to see a breakdown of some video games that use motion capture (Until Dawn, Detroit become human, The Last of Us)
Yeah, especially the Dr. Hill motion capture in Until Dawn. The way they captured his face movement was so good.
detroit was SO impressive in terms of face movements. seeing chloe the first time really freaked me out a little
Detroit would be particularly good as performance capture was intrisic in every scene.
Regarding the question of the use of someone’s identity without their permission, the case of Crispin Glover who sued the makers of Back to the Future part 2 for using a cast from his face used by make up artists for the first film to manufacture prosthetics for another actor to wear in order to fool the audience into thinking it was the same guy that was in the first film. He won his case and a law was created to protect performers.
How about the dreadful CG lower jaw moustache removal on Henry Cavill from the opening of Justice League, compared with the Deep Fake version...
Paulie68000 if there a link?
Carrie Fisher was still alive when they did that scene. I guess it's still a reconstruction though.
She did not do that one scene. Maybe she was in no condition to work
Bio Kimistry no Billie Lourd did not. It was a random actress. They have a small documentary about that scene and Tarkin on the Rouge One Blu-Ray
couldn't think of a name Carrie died suddenly while sitting in an airplane. They tried to resuscitate her but gave up after a few days. There was no period of "seriously ill but can still talk to the company about stuff".
Rogue One CGI of Princess Leia offended absolutely everything and everyone.
@@TheStonedZone. Hmm. I thought they did an excellent job on Peter Cushing.
That deepfake of Leia was supposed to be BETTER? ... I don't see what you're seeing.
Agreed. Her mouth didnt even match what she was saying. It looked like she said an extra syllable or something, not just “hope.”
Oh hey didnt expect to see you here
Tbf, it was. Still not perfect, but still...
Forget the face details but the expression with eyes are real.
It looks better to me
Now we need Chadwick Boseman CGI for Black Panther 😔
We do not.
Marvel stated they are not doing that because it may seem disrespectful to his legacy, which it would be if done wrong or not.
Tom Cruise won't let his likeness be used in games and things. It seems like he already owns it.
And yet they did it anyway
Xenu has dibs on those likenesses
Can’t wait until they react to the scene with young Luke and Leah in “rise of skywalker” ...I thought it was pretty damn good
It was good and was a short scene and very dark but Luke looked great and leia as they trained with Litesabers
@@juanelorriaga2840 Luke looked amazing, but Leia was meh.
Jabba looked better then leia in rosw training moment
@@grimm1206 it was because it was Carrie fishers daughter it wasn't actually a CGI model.
Leia was actually Carrie’s daughter. They promised not to CG remake her and the closest they had to Carrie was her daughter.
Corridor Crew: "Leave a comment below!"
Me: "Hell, yeah! I have some suggestions!" ... thousands of comments appear ... "... okay, whatever. Why even bother."
Way to waste your top rated comment whining instead of putting a suggestion :p
The Simpsons episode of filming radioactive man, has the best cg replacement of a character ever 🤣
AAAAH YOU GUYS MISSED BLADE RUNNER 2049 That has like the most accurate digital face I've ever seen
Agree.
Rachel in that is EASILY the best CGI person I've ever seen I can't believe they missed it. I hope they do it as a little bonus clip
You should definitely take a look at Blade Runner 2049. Young Rachel looked great in it.
Was just about to say this, the CG on Rachel was brilliant.
Exactly what I was going to say. That movie as a whole was visual bliss but that scene takes the cake.
React to Guardians of the Galaxy 1 and 2 in the next CGI video!
9:00 I think I know whats off for Peter Cushings character. There’s no since of groundedness or rhythm in his motion. He’s gliding or floating too much. There’s no weight to his facial gestures.
Since the Carrie Fischer one is borderline it - de-aging CGI! Samuel L. Jackson etc
Valherjar No, because Carrie Fisher wasn’t the one on set and even the audio was taken from the archive. All she did was give her blessing to it, as Cushing’s estate did.
as i remember first movie de aging actor i ever been watch is torn legacy
"That looks WAY better!"
Me: Doesn't notice a difference...
Same.
the lighting and shape of her eyes and t-zone are different enough (as its based on carrie fisher footage) that it becomes natural and feels natural to the viewer, plus her lip movements
Honestly, it looked faker to me
I actually thought it looked worse in some ways... it looked more, "Real" texture wise, but movement wise looked worse. to me.
Les me guess, Marvel fan?
"Grandma Tarkin"!
That's what I shall call him from now on. XD
Lol, I'm not the only one! That's my #1 misheard line ever and I've been using it since I was a kid.