I remember the DC3 as a boy in western Sydney, Australia in the 60's. They flew out of Mascot airport and were at about 8,000 ft as they passed over me often working hard against prevailing westerlies. They were used for 30 years or so on mail and passenger runs to rural and remote communities before being replaced by turboprop aircraft or even in a few cases converted to turboprop. The Australians called them biscuit bombers because they were used to supply food to troops in New Guinea in WW2. A great aircraft.
I knew a guy who flew DC 3 for Trans World Airlines after WW2 as co-pilot. He still gave tours of the Kansas City Airline History Museum when he was 101 years old .
This Aircraft is legend, with still over a hundred flying, I can't see any modern aircraft airborne in twenty years, let alone the 75 plus years of these old girls, wonderful working machines.Excellent Photography too Thank You.
Thank you so much for this visual delight!! My dream would be to one day (again) fly in one of these! I did in the late '60's from Halifax to Les Iles du Madeleine & recall the distinct CLIMB I had to do to get to the front row seats! I remember jokingly grabbing the head rests of the isle seats to pull myself up to the next row! ^_^ Cheers from Canada!
Whoever takes care of those engines does a great job with them, as they sound better than those on a new plane!! The new ones just sound like jets....nothin' special!!
Ahhhhh! Deus porque não volta os gigantes americanos aos céus! E eu até hoje tenho na minha cabeça esse lindo som acho a coisa mais linda!!!! Desde 1,958
Es el aeroplano mas hermoso que se haya construido, proximo ya a los 80años Su sonido es inconfundible Hace años que no escuchaba un DC3 y su sonido de susu motores radiales me hizo latir mi viejo corazon
Probably the greatest aircraft EVER designed. One of the most historically significant airplanes EVER !...and the sound of radials.Mmmmm Music not needed.
The one and ONLY thing I don't like about the DC3 are the square passenger windows, everything else is just right -- big rudder, long, swept wings, close proximity radial engines, sturdy landing gear, the shape of the nose, the ability to fly on one engine (even with a heavy load), its sturdy construction which has kept it flying for over 80 YEARS ---- one of the best planes ever built.!
BOA NOITE!!!...C 47...da FAB.....nos anos de 1960...no Pq.de Material Aeronáutico...hj.e PAMA...la em Santana zona norte SP....onde fiz o serviço militar em 1967....✈🛩🛫🛬
The old Gooneys have a special place in my heart. Thanks for posting, and thanks also for the good audio / not dubbing in some horrible rock music like some do.
That, by the looks of things, is a pre war era DC-3. The giveaways are the snorkel coming out of the radio room and the pointed tail cone. Some rebuilt C-47's were converted to the airstair door after the war and the carb intakes are the small DC-3 style as compared to the C-47 which had the long shaped carb intake. Square windows were the norm until the advent of pressurized cabins. In this case I would think she had a stock swing type passenger door. Interestingly, she came out of the factory with Pratt Whitney motors as evidenced by the exhaust stacks being sunk into the nacelles, the conversions from Wright to P+W had a short stack as they didn't have the groove in the nacelle that the P+W motors needed
nice to see an old bird take to the skies again. flying these birds keeps them alive as oil seals stay lubricated and things that should be loose, stay loose. And theres no nicer sound than a big air cooled radial engine flying at a steady RPM with the pilot having no particular place to be and to be in no hurry to be anyware. instead letting the plane stretch its wings at its own pace
DC-3s with their small seating and cargo capacity have surprisingly big wing-span. Another noteworthy feature is that by the time DC-3s were designed and built the shape of modern passenger planes as regards their wing and tail fin shape and placement, engine placement etc had become standardised and haven't changed since then. Only very minor variations are seen in these.
I also understand that the wing from a DC-2 was once bolted on to a DC-3 when a DC-3 wing was not available. Each wing of a DC-3 transport plane is fastened on with 328 nuts and bolts.
Un antes del Douglas DC-3 / C-47 y un después de este legendario avión . Símbolo del triunfo del hombre en la joven ciencia aeronáutica , la más joven y la de más rápido progreso !!!
I have watched sooo many videos...went on sooo many ride alongs...heard soo much dialog. on take off it must be like this... Brakes on...run throttles up..mag check. throttle down. finish taxi... cleared for take off...start roll....rudder authority starts well at 35 mph. tail lifts at 50 mph.(depending on load) ground affect starts lifting at 85 mph.....rotate at 100 plus minus twenty for load. retract gear. DAMN IT MAN... I should have got into aviation instead of agriculture!
Beautiful aircraft shown up with excellent photography, I wonder whether the A 380 will by flyable at a similar age as this Queen of the Skies? Terry Offord
It won't since the A380 is a pressurized hull it can only take so much takeoffs, landings and pressure changes. The DC3 isn't a pressurized aircraft and will keep going forever.
You could have a lot of fun with that historical plane especially not getting stuck in those TSA NIGHTMARES at the airport an A10 would be nice too but since you don't have room for man's best friend to hang out in the cockpit with you I'll stick with my first choice
I spent two days waiting for just one more person to sign up for a ride on this airplane, it didn't happen. That was probably my last chance to ride a C-47/DC-3.
Great footage and a beautiful old Gooney Bird but I am confused as to why it looked like there were two different aircraft? While the paint is the same @5:11 the Tail and nose numbers are different.
Old #30 needs our help to get a new engine! Go to CAF's post here at their FB page. Donate anything you can. Let's get this gorgeous bird up and flying again m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1956949877741951&id=325577670879188
This aircraft was a C-47 during the war with the cargo door and utility interior. However, upon entering civilian service it was converted to a DC-3 hence you see the stair door. So this aircraft has the designation as both a C-47 And DC-3. After serving over 2000 hours during WWll and then entering civilian service... it was an airliner for a bit then Hoover Vacuum Cleaner Company purchased it and if became their corporate aircraft flying around their executives for 15 years. The current interior is still as a executive configuration from the time Hoover Vac owned it in the 1960's and in great condition. It is a fabulous aircraft and one of my favorites in our fleet at Airbase Arizona.
In radial engines... the oil will pass by the rings on the lower cylinders after sitting several hours. Therefore, A hydraulic lock is simply too much liquid in the combustion chamber. It leads to a bent connecting rod. Once the connecting rod is bent the engine is going to fail. That's a basic fact.
Something is wrong with this video. Or there are two different aircraft or the numbers were changed because the C-47 on land and taking off has the number 30 and the Commemorative air force logo but the one in flight has no number 30 and has the 53 numbers in the place of the Com. Air force logo and a "T" in the tail. What's going on? That's not good for credibility.
When the the aircraft gains enough velocity for the tailplane to generate lift it becomes airborne without any control input. Wright Flyer, USAF (1968-1972)
I remember the DC3 as a boy in western Sydney, Australia in the 60's. They flew out of Mascot airport and were at about 8,000 ft as they passed over me often working hard against prevailing westerlies. They were used for 30 years or so on mail and passenger runs to rural and remote communities before being replaced by turboprop aircraft or even in a few cases converted to turboprop. The Australians called them biscuit bombers because they were used to supply food to troops in New Guinea in WW2. A great aircraft.
THESE WERE THE GOOD OLD DAYS. THE SOUND OF THOSE ENGINES, MUSIC TO MI EARS
I have seen this aircraft in person. Both inside and out. Part of a great museum.
Just seeing this Dakota flying brings back the emory of seeing them towing gliders for the D Day landings . lest we forget
I knew a guy who flew DC 3 for Trans World Airlines after WW2 as co-pilot. He still gave tours of the Kansas City Airline History Museum when he was 101 years old .
This Aircraft is legend, with still over a hundred flying, I can't see any modern aircraft airborne in twenty years, let alone the 75 plus years of these old girls, wonderful working machines.Excellent Photography too Thank You.
Check out this D Day DC 3 "Gooney Bird" come back to life
th-cam.com/video/FIugl2xueik/w-d-xo.html
100? Over a thousand are registered and flying in the US alone.
Era esse avião que eu via passar quando tinha oito anos 1962
The DC-3 is an historic, iconic and beautiful aircraft.
Thank you so much for this visual delight!! My dream would be to one day (again) fly in one of these! I did in the late '60's from Halifax to Les Iles du Madeleine & recall the distinct CLIMB I had to do to get to the front row seats! I remember jokingly grabbing the head rests of the isle seats to pull myself up to the next row! ^_^ Cheers from Canada!
Impressionante...um senhor de 70 anos voando com perfeição .a aviação é incrível !
Whoever takes care of those engines does a great job with them, as they sound better than those on a new plane!! The new ones just sound like jets....nothin' special!!
Ahhhhh! Deus porque não volta os gigantes americanos aos céus! E eu até hoje tenho na minha cabeça esse lindo som acho a coisa mais linda!!!! Desde 1,958
Beautiful! The beautiful mule of the skies
The old DC-3 is a great example of that saying If its not broke, don't fix it.
Hermósos los dc3
Americas crown jewel of aviation. What a tribute to her engineers.
Es el aeroplano mas hermoso que se haya construido, proximo ya a los 80años
Su sonido es inconfundible Hace años que no escuchaba un DC3 y su sonido de susu motores radiales me hizo latir mi viejo corazon
Probably the greatest aircraft EVER designed. One of the most historically significant airplanes EVER !...and the sound of radials.Mmmmm Music not needed.
The one and ONLY thing I don't like about the DC3 are the square passenger windows, everything else is just right -- big rudder, long, swept wings, close proximity radial engines, sturdy landing gear, the shape of the nose, the ability to fly on one engine (even with a heavy load), its sturdy construction which has kept it flying for over 80 YEARS ---- one of the best planes ever built.!
..cora
Check out this D Day DC 3 "Gooney Bird" come back to life
th-cam.com/video/FIugl2xueik/w-d-xo.html
What a weird thing to complain about.
mais pourquoi ce son me rend dingue ! je comprends pas ! c'est du Mozart ou quoi ! j'adore !
BOA NOITE!!!...C 47...da FAB.....nos anos de 1960...no Pq.de Material Aeronáutico...hj.e PAMA...la em Santana zona norte SP....onde fiz o serviço militar em 1967....✈🛩🛫🛬
I flew in one of these that was owned by Reeves Aleutian Airlines from Fort Glen to Nikolski on Umnak Island in 1971.
The old Gooneys have a special place in my heart. Thanks for posting, and thanks also for the good audio / not dubbing in some horrible rock music like some do.
thanks for posting a quality video with propellers really turning. !! A rare sight today.
O melhor avião de todos os tempos.
I flew on DC 3 for r and. R from Saigon to Hong Kong back in 1966 twice !!! Saigon airline 5 hour flight
Beautyful and unforgettable!
In 1959 Sargent Eddie Powell from Chicago taught me preflight his C-47 at EAFB calif.
That, by the looks of things, is a pre war era DC-3. The giveaways are the snorkel coming out of the radio room and the pointed tail cone. Some rebuilt C-47's were converted to the airstair door after the war and the carb intakes are the small DC-3 style as compared to the C-47 which had the long shaped carb intake. Square windows were the norm until the advent of pressurized cabins. In this case I would think she had a stock swing type passenger door. Interestingly, she came out of the factory with Pratt Whitney motors as evidenced by the exhaust stacks being sunk into the nacelles, the conversions from Wright to P+W had a short stack as they didn't have the groove in the nacelle that the P+W motors needed
GOSH! great pics ---thanks.
nice to see an old bird take to the skies again. flying these birds keeps them alive as oil seals stay lubricated and things that should be loose, stay loose. And theres no nicer sound than a big air cooled radial engine flying at a steady RPM with the pilot having no particular place to be and to be in no hurry to be anyware. instead letting the plane stretch its wings at its own pace
Segundo até onde eu sei... esse DC3 foi o melhor avião do mundo mesmo... até hoje ele ainda está voando!
My first DC-3 flight was from St Louis to Moline, Ill airport. No info on ear problems so I had a couple days pain.
O saudoso presidente da república federativa do Brasil... Getúlio Vargas tinha um!
DC-3s with their small seating and cargo capacity have surprisingly big wing-span. Another noteworthy feature is that by the time DC-3s were designed and built the shape of modern passenger planes as regards their wing and tail fin shape and placement, engine placement etc had become standardised and haven't changed since then. Only very minor variations are seen in these.
I also understand that the wing from a DC-2 was once bolted on to a DC-3 when a DC-3 wing was not available. Each wing of a DC-3 transport plane is fastened on with 328 nuts and bolts.
Great video. Both the visuals and the sound!!
Legendär!
C'est vraiment un bel avion... mythique... 😊
Un antes del Douglas DC-3 / C-47 y un después de este legendario avión . Símbolo del triunfo del hombre en la joven ciencia aeronáutica , la más joven y la de más rápido progreso !!!
No Hamburger Door? Boy, he kind of slammed it onto the runway.
I love this airplane!
The plane that takes off is number 30, the one in flight and approaching is number 53, number 30 land and taxi.
I have watched sooo many videos...went on sooo many ride alongs...heard soo much dialog. on take off it must be like this... Brakes on...run throttles up..mag check. throttle down. finish taxi... cleared for take off...start roll....rudder authority starts well at 35 mph. tail lifts at 50 mph.(depending on load) ground affect starts lifting at 85 mph.....rotate at 100 plus minus twenty for load. retract gear. DAMN IT MAN... I should have got into aviation instead of agriculture!
Beautiful aircraft shown up with excellent photography, I wonder whether the A 380 will by flyable at a similar age as this Queen of the Skies? Terry Offord
It won't since the A380 is a pressurized hull it can only take so much takeoffs, landings and pressure changes. The DC3 isn't a pressurized aircraft and will keep going forever.
First A380 was already broken up, an ex Singapore bird.
Btw im from the future, air france started retiring the a380 lmao
I hobs als Kind in Tirol immer fasziniert bestaunt. ...
Wonderful video. Proud team obviously. Where was test flight??
KFFZ Falcon Field in Mesa Arizona
With two engines pratt & withney R-1830-94 .Exellent., Exellent test flight.
Se ora si può viaggiare in tutto il mondo, inchiniamoci a questa macchina che ha creato il mito dell'aviazione civile!! OK?
You could have a lot of fun with that historical plane especially not getting stuck in those TSA NIGHTMARES at the airport an A10 would be nice too but since you don't have room for man's best friend to hang out in the cockpit with you I'll stick with my first choice
I spent two days waiting for just one more person to sign up for a ride on this airplane, it didn't happen. That was probably my last chance to ride a C-47/DC-3.
Great footage and a beautiful old Gooney Bird but I am confused as to why it looked like there were two different aircraft? While the paint is the same @5:11 the Tail and nose numbers are different.
an excellent aircraft, here in Brazil an idiot recently destroyed a dc-3
I have flying in one of these on my bucket list. Does your group do rides?
Is the purpose of turning the prop by hand to push oil thru the engine before start up?
Puff-th-magic dragon.
"The" airplane!
Two different aircraft? Where did number 53 with T on the tail come from?
Old #30 needs our help to get a new engine! Go to CAF's post here at their FB page. Donate anything you can. Let's get this gorgeous bird up and flying again
m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1956949877741951&id=325577670879188
I was born 50 years to late......Dang nabbit!
We used to call them Dakota
Lindo
I don’t see a cargo door on this aircraft. Assuming this aircraft was built during WW2, wouldn’t that mean it’s a C-53 rather than a C-47?
This aircraft was a C-47 during the war with the cargo door and utility interior. However, upon entering civilian service it was converted to a DC-3 hence you see the stair door. So this aircraft has the designation as both a C-47 And DC-3. After serving over 2000 hours during WWll and then entering civilian service... it was an airliner for a bit then Hoover Vacuum Cleaner Company purchased it and if became their corporate aircraft flying around their executives for 15 years. The current interior is still as a executive configuration from the time Hoover Vac owned it in the 1960's and in great condition. It is a fabulous aircraft and one of my favorites in our fleet at Airbase Arizona.
There is two DC-3s One has markings of #30 and the other one has markings #53 ???
El poderoso C_47Douglas
Why are they cranking the propellers before starting engines?
In radial engines... the oil will pass by the rings on the lower cylinders after sitting several hours. Therefore, A hydraulic lock is simply too much liquid in the combustion chamber. It leads to a bent connecting rod. Once the connecting rod is bent the engine is going to fail. That's a basic fact.
Something is wrong with this video. Or there are two different aircraft or the numbers were changed because the C-47 on land and taking off has the number 30 and the Commemorative air force logo but the one in flight has no number 30 and has the 53 numbers in the place of the Com. Air force logo and a "T" in the tail. What's going on? That's not good for credibility.
Dolphin Douglas because all old aviation engineering in my knowledge
我也有試飛過 C-47 。（ 不過是地面上！）
The Dakota nose and Huey basically the same
This not a C-47, its a civilian DC-3 or a C-53. There is no cargo door. Along with the very suspicious video footage I ask who are you trying to fool?
So how does it happen that on the ground it is # 30 and in the air it becomes #53?
Gute Figur , die Alte !
Does it not close the wheels while flying?
At 5:04 and about 2 o'clock what is that in the sky??
Push yoke forward 2 get lift?
Push yoke forward to see out the windshield
Only on the rear end
When the the aircraft gains enough velocity for the tailplane to generate lift it becomes airborne without any control input. Wright Flyer, USAF (1968-1972)
To get the tailwheel off the deck and reduce the angle of attack of the wings, until rotation, then as needed to achieve positive rate of climb.
Supa , die oid Scheesn !
3:05
Kinda makes the Max 37 look like a piece of junk!