As an Air Force meteorologist, I use to give weekend forecasts to the flight planners on Tuesday. This was from 1980 to about 1986. Tuesdays were the days the longer range models were put out. There was one flight planner who called me every Tuesday morning, and asked for the weather the following weekend. One day..I realized that him asking for Green Bay, and other cities were ALL cities with NFL home games. Aviation weather...temp, precipitation, winds, etc., are all parameters that affect football scoring. He was betting the unders, and had been for years. I called him on it, and he laughed pretty hard. "How are we doing?" I asked...and his response? "Well, I'm still calling you." I made him MANY thousands of dollars..as frankly, I have some skill at extended range forecasting...skills the sports book had yet to develop, 40 years ago.
I'll give you a funny story. I'm watching the Broncos game...at least I think it was the Broncos. Suddenly it starts pouring buckets of freezing rain. You could barely see 20 feet. So I figure....bet on the under for that quarter. I'm mean they ain't gonna be passing the ball and the clocks gonna keep running. So I bet no more than I could afford to lose on the under for the quarter. And then 3 touchdowns were scored on passing plays. And the colour guy says, "Wow that's the worst defensive quarter Denver has had since 1988." Ah....betting on the weather.
They shouldn't be legally allowed to have their cake and eat it too. If they are allowed to exploit those with gambling addictions, then sharps should be freely allowed to exploit sports books as well.
a utube video is fake it shows a guy in vegas claiming he won stacks of money at mgm he has at home and collecting he doosent even have a manager there no one wins a million in a few days and would be allowed to bet 300k on a ticket as he claims its done for advertising i think cant be sports is uncertain as covers are by a half point sometimes yesterday over 42.5 nfl and was 42 even w the safety at the end could have busted some people
They can track you at a kiosk through your ticket exchange. If you bet at a kiosk with the proceeds of a winning ticket, they can track the ticket line and determine a bettor's competence by the bets connected to each other. Cashing each ticket and inserting cash into the kiosk breaks the ticket line and makes the bettor more anonymous.
I went three consecutive weeks, years ago, in an NFL betting pool going 48-3, with one week going 17-0. Week four, I was kicked out of the casino, AFTER I wouldn't share my betting picks for that week. It was pretty fun. For the record, I would have gone 9-7 that fourth week.
I have never lost on an annual basis with sports betting, and I’m not super handicapper. Every day every online casino offers a bonus. You just bet on it and bet on the other side the other way. It’s 3rd grade math. MGM and DraftKing aren’t talking to each other so in the end you are a winner on each side. After two years I am now limited to $25 bets.
What I don't understand is that if you bet a line that has an edge, and you do it on a regular basis, why would that be a problem for a sportsbook? THEY are the ones offering that line, and SOMEONE is going to bet on it. Why do they care if it's a smaller or greater number of people? They are punishing smart people for their own bad lines. There is no guarantee the sharp will win that bet anyway.
In Britain they ban you if you have a run of wins am on my 11th company in 4 yrs and my limited bets are £ 20 per day plus my odds are cut also. I heard they put a app on you to monitor you .
Governments allow these crooks to milk people but when it's their turn to bleed they can just close your account, make it make sense.... This is pure thuggery
Start beating a casino table game like roulette because your system fits the min and max bets and watch casino manager quickly show up. Happened to me. 😂
@@Milpower if the min and max bets on roulette are wide enough (specifically if the min bet is on the extreme low side), you can bet on red or black consistently with a N+1 or N+X technique. The gap has to be wide in terms of multiple so you don't end up losing a bunch of money when it is too late. It works good if you aren't greedy and you are basically betting that red or black won't hit 10+ times in a row. Great for getting some extra money for a lunch or some extra money for the Uber back home LOL!
@@TraumaER if you bet 1 on black every time you will lose in the long run. If you bet 2 on black every time you will lose in the long run. If you bet 4 on black, or 8 on black or 16 or 32...every time--you will lose in the long run. It may take hundreds and hundreds of restarts to get you up to that do or die bet, but whatever that number is, if you bet that amount every time, you'll lose in the long run.
@@aFREEsportsbettingSYSTEMdisagree as you don’t understand the strategy I presented. It only works if the ratio is there. Most casinos have it so you can do it. Example is MGM usually has something like $50 min $300 max. You will lose long term. If the min was $5 and max was $100 like in foreign casinos, you can and should win easily slowly long term.
@@TraumaER yeah, I guess I don't understand the strategy in the same way you don't understand my point. Whatever amount you bet, however many times you bet it, you will win less than half the time getting paid even money. There is no way you will win in the long run assuming the wheel has no bias of any kind.
This is a real eye-opener! Winning sounds great until you realize the countermeasures from sportsbooks. Thanks for shedding light on this side of betting!
Books should be forced to manage their lines and edge in a way that they make a profit despite winners. Allowing them to boot or restrict players is wrong. This is no different than barring a shopper because they use too many coupons. If you don't like that, give out fewer coupons.
no it's more like making mcdonalds give their food away just because i am hungry when you own a business you are hoping to run it and make your living as long as what you are doing is legal instead of pleasing a few it guys like capt jack or am i wrong if he thought about it why don't he just open his own sportsbook because he knows so much gambling should be entertainment with very low limits like no bets over $100 if even that high if you doubt me look at what a mess it has caused in the usa that's our government for you they could have consulted with the uk australia and all the other places around the world where this has been going on for years legalizing gambling was a terrible thing this is coming from a guy that has been betting 2 dollars on an event for over 50 years
This is so 100% on point. I've had 2 accounts canceled in the last 3 weeks. I lost over $40000 between both accounts through this football season. And in 2 weeks. I basically won back my money and I got the first week's payment. And now they still haven't paid me Uber $12000 and 1 account and $7000. A $100 don't do business with Empire. They're a bunch of thieves. I'm down in miami
Guy's money manager says to him...."Look at these gambling losses....ridiculous. 3000 dollars on baseball, 7500 dollars on basketball and 9000 dollars on football. What about hockey? Why didn't you bet on hockey?" Guy says, "Hockey? I dunno anything about hockey."
When they give you the odds, it's to absolutely push towards betting a loser, not actually who they believe will win! Getting the most bets on the loser's is their goal!😅
A properly sports book never cares who wins or looses or how much. They are paying you with the losers money not theirs. A well ran book is balancing the payout odds versus the bets on each side of the ledger. There is ZERO reason for them to care about winners in sports books. Yes they can occasionally take a small loss but not that much. Limiting your bet size is because they know the odds are moving too fast and they know better than take a risk on a rapidly changing line.
Sportsbooks don’t balance the line based on having half the bettors on one side or the other. That’s a myth. If it were the case, sportsbooks would move their lines more extremely. Check out some of our other videos.
@@Unabated LOL, where exactly did I say they did? I said they did it from a series of things odds, payouts, and balancing, but the liability is balanced or they are not doing it right.
If what he said was true.. we would see guys that make huge bets all the time and even win some. No one is telling Mattress Matt he cant bet Millions? Thats only one example. But this guy thinks they care about his 500 or 1k bets. 🤔 please
@@c7adventures376 True... but even Mattress Matt would be limited if he tried to drop a million on one side if the casino did not think they could cover it by moving the line with payout odds, or bets on the other side to balance the line. Casinos are not dumb, they limit their risk... there is no such thing as "breaking the casino" really.
@@c7adventures376 They do care about his $500-$1 k bets. You have no clue how finicky most sports books are about sharp bettors. It doesn't make sense on the surface, but it's true. Mattress Mack can only bet millions because they expect him to be a long-term loser.
All I want to know is, if I go back in time to, say, 2023, would they let me bet, say, $10,000 on Domingo German to pitch a perfect game and have them pay out $100 million (roughly the odds of a perfect game)?
Please guys I have been betting for over eleven years now but never made a progress. From 2012 till date. Am pleading for an assistant please please guys
Yeah, it's kind of sad the way the industry works. It was legalized in Kansas about 1 1/2 years ago. So instantly, I wanted to get into it and start making profits. In your opinion what sportsbooks are quick to limit you? Also, which sportsbooks have you noticed welcome sharp bettors? I put in live bets, are crap parlays just to lessen the footprint. Also, throw in some crap live-game bets. Haven't ever been restricted yet and crossing my fingers.
you can simlply bet in kiosks in atlantic city and you have alot of outlets dont bet too much on a ticket or they could close the bet but unlikely if you have a personal acct they can track you
saw videos of pros who use a number of phones in denver and even a kid using arbitrage and sjows he won 200k last yr and the unabated guy alos and the whale in vegas is one of the best and he showed videos he ses round rbin methods high and low make s aprofit afterbetting huge amounts@@SportsBettingDude
There’s no practical way for a sportsbook to balance the action on both sides because the market is always moving based on news and information. Books lower their exposed liability by moving lines to induce action but none are expecting to completely balance. They know that their innate advantage with the vig will be enough to profit in the long run.
guys, and how long do you think it will take for bookmakers to BAN your account if you make 15-25% per month? even if we talking about 10-20k bankroll. they will definitely want to destroy your positive account, right? what do you think and what to do with it? for example, if he talks about Stake or other crypto books. thanks 🙏
Disguise them with some parlays, low money. Grow your bank roll and don’t withdraw all of it. Use different books as well. “Look messy, but have discipline”
Years ago you could place bets with professional sports books like "Pinnacle" and not have to worry about being banned or limited.unfortunately it is illegal to place bets with the offshore sports books,now that sports gambling has been legalized in the u.s.american sports books are way inferior.
vegas whale has made millions and he bets and lives in vegas they have limited him he showed videos on the emails his agency sent he uses round robins bankroll down when losing up when winning he loses but makes a profit on a group of bets betting 2 teams 3 or 4 combined 800 or lesss a group
it was already illega they use bitcoin now and many closed years ago and i hade funds in one they are still taking usa clients some of them@@alleykat6171
i was kicked out of a ny online because i didnt have current id and reported them to gaming i had only 160 to get they sent ck and closed me other sites dont require id and pay right away on debit card@@alleykat6171
That's fine, but they also advertise that ANYONE can come in and win and that you can change your life by winning at sports betting. The reality is, if you win, they'll limit you. If you lose, they'll encourage you to bet more. Doesn't seem fair to advertise that anyone can come in and try to win - but they won't let people play who they think could actually win.
@@Unabated I'm hearing you, you're making some good points. I'd say there's a difference between outright banning someone vs lowering his limit. End of the day, I don't have a horse in this race, because I'm neither bettor nor bookie, but I do hope you make a lot of dough!
The idea of blanket limiting a sharp seems counter-intuitive to the sportsbooks ability to maximize profits, because like you said, nobody is an expert at everything the book has to offer. Given the juice built into all bets, to me it would make more business sense for the books to balance their risk on both sides whenever possible. The books you mentioned that have established limits for all makes so much sense. At the end of the day, if two people walk in wanting to bet $100 on the same exact bet, there's no reason for the books to accept one and not the other.
I think the problem is that if a sharp wants to bet one side, he's getting the best number out of multiple books, and you may never get a guy to walk in and bet that other side--which can probably be had at other places for slightly better odds. That said, in the long run you'd expect the books as a group to win overall, even if a sharp is laying -125 here and another is taking +123 there. Shorter term, the books with the sharpest numbers will come out ahead while the books with some outlier numbers might take some hits.
Please guys I have been betting for over eleven years now but never made a progress. From 2012 till date. Am pleading for an assistant please please guys
I am professional roullete player. the most important thing is good money management, stop loss, take profit for the day and strategy with more that 96% chances"
❓ i kind of get what you are saying.... but if that was true. We would not see guys making millions of bets. They seem to take the bets big or small. Cant win them all. Right?
I wonder what the state gamin authorities think about this. If a book, especially on-line started limiting me, I'd document it, and file a complaint with the state gaming authority. And on-line being what it is, I'd rally other skilled sports bettors to do the same, and maybe even push it into the political / media arena, and get the sports books bad press about it.
Unfortunately, regulators say that companies reserve the right to refuse business with bettors as long as they are not discriminating based on race, religion, or ethnicity.
Bad press is the way to go, because limiting an business freedoms to choose who they do business with (unless race,religuin,ethnicity) isnt going to fly I think.
@@SuperYxskaftThis is a licensed public accommodation. Some regulation is acceptable. Making them take any legitimate bet on an equal basis seems perfectly reasonable.
@@bbmw9029 Oh dont take me wrong, I despise the entire betting industry, a bunch of vultures that ruins peoples lives and that just wants the benefits without any risks. But I think making a law that forces them to take any bet isnt going to happen, even though its more then reasonable, it should be pretty obvious thats how it should be.
I'd say you're wrong on no one can know every sport. If you are gambling and can angle one, what's to say you don't have information on others? Seems reasonable to spread the wealth to even it if working. You say you don't know, but come on now. Don't feed me bs.
Easy to make you when you have an online account. With your sign in, it's like your ID, and it's easy for the software to be alerted and modified to restrict your account. If I were this guy, I'd be making cash bets only at walk up sports books. Then if they started asking for an ID or sweating his live action, I'd send in other people to make my bets for me at the casino walk up book
Literally no one ever has to worry about this bc the sports books don’t lose lol and never will. My new opinion is no one is a professional sports bettor. I used to think so but in this day and age I just think the sports books have the smartest minds in the world working for them and the numbers and lines they put out everyday are simply unbeatable
Most sportsbooks pay the equivalent of $20-25/hr to their risk management staff. The only reason you'd want to take that job is if you couldn't beat them yourself - and that would only lower the talent pool working for the sportsbook even further. The cycle perpetuates from there.
A cooperation can’t be greedy when they win Then be stingy when they lose Abuse the law band you when your not losing especially if you are not cheating Can’t be punished for be good Not fair
I've turned down a couple job offers from sportsbooks. Operators notoriously underpay their staff, which is one of the reasons they're beatable in the first place.
Different books have different amounts that trigger needing to see an ID. For instance, Caesars is $1000 placed or cashed in total in a day. The FinCEN guidelines are $3000 for a soft ID check and $10k for a hard ID check, but most books set much lower limits just to KYC.
Draft Kings made my buddy a platinum member and sends him all kinds of boosts every week it’s crazy. But I can’t do it in my state so I have to stick to the illegal bookie who only pays out in cash. I don’t ask questions.
Play the long game. They wont boot you if you lose. Its about profit. Not winning everyday let alone draw attention to yourself by wagering large amounts. Thats just arrogant and greedy.
@@Unabated that's still some time ago but most Cities still can't go online more than in person, seem the best response because as if things so wrong why can't all cities bet online but every can tell everyone there wrong for tryna sacrifice the best risk to make anything possible regardless but can't, who saving who from what the average better must do in person betting for there tracking of selfish house odd regardless
This taught absolutely zero about betting on sports. What sites to use to research, what types of lines for what sports should a person be looking at and why. Historical data showing why certain markets have been profitable over time. These are the types of topics that teach someone about sports betting. Everyone knows about being limited but that isn’t helping you on anyway with making your picks
@@decoyaardvark2828an example? The problem with that is without knowing my bank or how much I was trying to win it wouldn’t mean anything. And if I told you how much I’m trying to win this season you’d think I was a fantasist. So instead I will just give a few of the teams I shall be betting next week in parlays to win their leagues or be promoted if stated : (all markets from Bet365 which is the easiest bookie to beat at this) Man City Derby /Bolton Willem II Parma Real Madrid Inter Hornchurch Yeovil Needham Young Boys Ferencvarosi FCSB LA Clippers (division) Stenhousemuir Falkirk. I’m actually trading all those markets and many more.
dont know what you mean i do know a few pros are winning in vegas big time as the whale who sent me messages and videos he uses a round robin and other facors such a s a team must win 1 of 3 in baseball and he raises bet if it loses the first game till wins he beys groups and makes a huge profit over time or short time@@decoyaardvark2828
If you are betting $500 on a single bet at a single sports book you have no common sense to start with. What you must do is SPREAD your risk across 5 sports books. So you never go higher that $100. You must also be seen to be LOSING significant amounts on a sportsbook. You do this in rotation. While picking up profits on another sports book. This keeps them thinking you are just a lucky bettor. I've been able to win thousands over the years doing this and stay under the radar. Greedy bettors with no sense will of course be stopped.
Great plan. One question, when you’re betting in excess of say $1000, $2000, then what? If I had a pound every time said there’s this one trick to not get limited, I could retire.
As an Air Force meteorologist, I use to give weekend forecasts to the flight planners on Tuesday. This was from 1980 to about 1986. Tuesdays were the days the longer range models were put out. There was one flight planner who called me every Tuesday morning, and asked for the weather the following weekend. One day..I realized that him asking for Green Bay, and other cities were ALL cities with NFL home games. Aviation weather...temp, precipitation, winds, etc., are all parameters that affect football scoring. He was betting the unders, and had been for years. I called him on it, and he laughed pretty hard. "How are we doing?" I asked...and his response? "Well, I'm still calling you." I made him MANY thousands of dollars..as frankly, I have some skill at extended range forecasting...skills the sports book had yet to develop, 40 years ago.
This is such a fun story haha - thanks for sharing man
Great story - send him an invoice
Best comment I've read on TH-cam this week.
I'll give you a funny story. I'm watching the Broncos game...at least I think it was the Broncos. Suddenly it starts pouring buckets of freezing rain. You could barely see 20 feet. So I figure....bet on the under for that quarter. I'm mean they ain't gonna be passing the ball and the clocks gonna keep running. So I bet no more than I could afford to lose on the under for the quarter.
And then 3 touchdowns were scored on passing plays. And the colour guy says, "Wow that's the worst defensive quarter Denver has had since 1988."
Ah....betting on the weather.
They shouldn't be legally allowed to have their cake and eat it too. If they are allowed to exploit those with gambling addictions, then sharps should be freely allowed to exploit sports books as well.
Karma is beautiful
What good is a cake if you can't eat it?
a utube video is fake it shows a guy in vegas claiming he won stacks of money at mgm he has at home and collecting he doosent even have a manager there no one wins a million in a few days and would be allowed to bet 300k on a ticket as he claims its done for advertising i think cant be sports is uncertain as covers are by a half point sometimes yesterday over 42.5 nfl and was 42 even w the safety at the end could have busted some people
@@rogerrosen2323
Junior, use punctuation. You write like a child. It shows lack of thought and impulse control.
Sports Books are still Ran by the Mafia.
They can track you at a kiosk through your ticket exchange. If you bet at a kiosk with the proceeds of a winning ticket, they can track the ticket line and determine a bettor's competence by the bets connected to each other. Cashing each ticket and inserting cash into the kiosk breaks the ticket line and makes the bettor more anonymous.
I went three consecutive weeks, years ago, in an NFL betting pool going 48-3, with one week going 17-0. Week four, I was kicked out of the casino, AFTER I wouldn't share my betting picks for that week. It was pretty fun. For the record, I would have gone 9-7 that fourth week.
I have never lost on an annual basis with sports betting, and I’m not super handicapper. Every day every online casino offers a bonus. You just bet on it and bet on the other side the other way. It’s 3rd grade math. MGM and DraftKing aren’t talking to each other so in the end you are a winner on each side. After two years I am now limited to $25 bets.
nice
this dude knows whats he talking about
I'm lucky Im a low level bettor, I still see gambling as entertainment. This is useful information, Thank you.
What I don't understand is that if you bet a line that has an edge, and you do it on a regular basis, why would that be a problem for a sportsbook? THEY are the ones offering that line, and SOMEONE is going to bet on it. Why do they care if it's a smaller or greater number of people? They are punishing smart people for their own bad lines. There is no guarantee the sharp will win that bet anyway.
Was down 2300, had a good run in a week was up, now they won't let me withdraw all of a sudden. Fanduel
If you use many books this avoids everything
Just delaying the inevitable
In Britain they ban you if you have a run of wins am on my 11th company in 4 yrs and my limited bets are £ 20 per day plus my odds are cut also. I heard they put a app on you to monitor you .
20 quid fck wot you moaning at I'm restricted to 63p 👍🤣
5:00 the limits on every sport are more likely a software limitation. The system can limit you but they can't differentiate between certain sports.
This is why I prefer Daily Fantasy. Companies don't care if I take other people's money, they only care if I take _their_ money.
dont you think its easier to win? or nah?
Yeah, bankrupt addicts and fools but the second they lose they decide to take action. It's should be made illegal.
Governments allow these crooks to milk people but when it's their turn to bleed they can just close your account, make it make sense.... This is pure thuggery
That’s the entire point of Casinos and sports books existing
Start beating a casino table game like roulette because your system fits the min and max bets and watch casino manager quickly show up. Happened to me. 😂
I play professionally and am allowed to stay (am even encouraged to).
What systems do you use?
@@Milpower if the min and max bets on roulette are wide enough (specifically if the min bet is on the extreme low side), you can bet on red or black consistently with a N+1 or N+X technique. The gap has to be wide in terms of multiple so you don't end up losing a bunch of money when it is too late. It works good if you aren't greedy and you are basically betting that red or black won't hit 10+ times in a row. Great for getting some extra money for a lunch or some extra money for the Uber back home LOL!
@@TraumaER if you bet 1 on black every time you will lose in the long run. If you bet 2 on black every time you will lose in the long run. If you bet 4 on black, or 8 on black or 16 or 32...every time--you will lose in the long run. It may take hundreds and hundreds of restarts to get you up to that do or die bet, but whatever that number is, if you bet that amount every time, you'll lose in the long run.
@@aFREEsportsbettingSYSTEMdisagree as you don’t understand the strategy I presented. It only works if the ratio is there. Most casinos have it so you can do it. Example is MGM usually has something like $50 min $300 max. You will lose long term. If the min was $5 and max was $100 like in foreign casinos, you can and should win easily slowly long term.
@@TraumaER yeah, I guess I don't understand the strategy in the same way you don't understand my point. Whatever amount you bet, however many times you bet it, you will win less than half the time getting paid even money. There is no way you will win in the long run assuming the wheel has no bias of any kind.
This is a real eye-opener! Winning sounds great until you realize the countermeasures from sportsbooks. Thanks for shedding light on this side of betting!
Books should be forced to manage their lines and edge in a way that they make a profit despite winners. Allowing them to boot or restrict players is wrong. This is no different than barring a shopper because they use too many coupons. If you don't like that, give out fewer coupons.
no it's more like making mcdonalds give their food away just because i am hungry when you own a business you are hoping to run it and make your living as long as what you are doing is legal instead of pleasing a few it guys like capt jack or am i wrong if he thought about it why don't he just open his own sportsbook because he knows so much gambling should be entertainment with very low limits like no bets over $100 if even that high if you doubt me look at what a mess it has caused in the usa that's our government for you they could have consulted with the uk australia and all the other places around the world where this has been going on for years legalizing gambling was a terrible thing this is coming from a guy that has been betting 2 dollars on an event for over 50 years
This is so 100% on point. I've had 2 accounts canceled in the last 3 weeks. I lost over $40000 between both accounts through this football season. And in 2 weeks. I basically won back my money and I got the first week's payment. And now they still haven't paid me Uber $12000 and 1 account and $7000. A $100 don't do business with Empire. They're a bunch of thieves. I'm down in miami
Why not use websites from different countries ?
Excellent video and explanations as to what books are doing.
I bet football for 8 years paid a mortgage doing it. Hit a 10 game parlay college never bet again
quit while your ahead is effective. The secret is getting ahead.
which book did you use and how big was the parlay ?
@@RealRorschach100 Unfortunately it was online odds were 60 to 1 Vegas at the time was 100 to 1
Guy's money manager says to him...."Look at these gambling losses....ridiculous. 3000 dollars on baseball, 7500 dollars on basketball and 9000 dollars on football. What about hockey? Why didn't you bet on hockey?"
Guy says, "Hockey? I dunno anything about hockey."
When they give you the odds, it's to absolutely push towards betting a loser, not actually who they believe will win! Getting the most bets on the loser's is their goal!😅
Nope. They want to hit the spread every time. They get 10% vig..and they don't WANT any imbalance in that. Costs them money.
Should be able to sue.
Can you tell us the names of the sports book that invite sharp action??
Sure. We talk about that frequently. Here it is cued up from another of our videos: th-cam.com/video/EQt2sq0_s64/w-d-xo.htmlsi=klgRxTn4W59GvmUp&t=185
this is a very good video and succinct
A properly sports book never cares who wins or looses or how much. They are paying you with the losers money not theirs. A well ran book is balancing the payout odds versus the bets on each side of the ledger. There is ZERO reason for them to care about winners in sports books. Yes they can occasionally take a small loss but not that much. Limiting your bet size is because they know the odds are moving too fast and they know better than take a risk on a rapidly changing line.
Sportsbooks don’t balance the line based on having half the bettors on one side or the other. That’s a myth. If it were the case, sportsbooks would move their lines more extremely. Check out some of our other videos.
@@Unabated LOL, where exactly did I say they did? I said they did it from a series of things odds, payouts, and balancing, but the liability is balanced or they are not doing it right.
If what he said was true.. we would see guys that make huge bets all the time and even win some. No one is telling Mattress Matt he cant bet Millions? Thats only one example. But this guy thinks they care about his 500 or 1k bets. 🤔 please
@@c7adventures376 True... but even Mattress Matt would be limited if he tried to drop a million on one side if the casino did not think they could cover it by moving the line with payout odds, or bets on the other side to balance the line. Casinos are not dumb, they limit their risk... there is no such thing as "breaking the casino" really.
@@c7adventures376 They do care about his $500-$1 k bets. You have no clue how finicky most sports books are about sharp bettors. It doesn't make sense on the surface, but it's true. Mattress Mack can only bet millions because they expect him to be a long-term loser.
There is one future I’d like in football-what will the first play be. I’d bet kickoff but it’s never offered😢.
All I want to know is, if I go back in time to, say, 2023, would they let me bet, say, $10,000 on Domingo German to pitch a perfect game and have them pay out $100 million (roughly the odds of a perfect game)?
I won $60k over 120 bets in Vegas. They never limited me.
What did you do with taxes for cash winnings?
Please guys I have been betting for over eleven years now but never made a progress. From 2012 till date. Am pleading for an assistant please please guys
Keep on winning!!
@@videosemmanuel6116 u gotta git gud. Dats all
@videosemmanuel6116 what type of assistance??
Are odds the same as dk and fanduel
Yeah, it's kind of sad the way the industry works. It was legalized in Kansas about 1 1/2 years ago. So instantly, I wanted to get into it and start making profits. In your opinion what sportsbooks are quick to limit you? Also, which sportsbooks have you noticed welcome sharp bettors?
I put in live bets, are crap parlays just to lessen the footprint. Also, throw in some crap live-game bets. Haven't ever been restricted yet and crossing my fingers.
you can simlply bet in kiosks in atlantic city and you have alot of outlets dont bet too much on a ticket or they could close the bet but unlikely if you have a personal acct they can track you
@@rogerrosen2323 it’s crazy the way this industry works. If your good at it you get limited.
saw videos of pros who use a number of phones in denver and even a kid using arbitrage and sjows he won 200k last yr and the unabated guy alos and the whale in vegas is one of the best and he showed videos he ses round rbin methods high and low make s aprofit afterbetting huge amounts@@SportsBettingDude
I don't know much about this subject, but shouldn't the books manage their lines so their cut is guaranteed they don't care who wins or loses?
There’s no practical way for a sportsbook to balance the action on both sides because the market is always moving based on news and information. Books lower their exposed liability by moving lines to induce action but none are expecting to completely balance.
They know that their innate advantage with the vig will be enough to profit in the long run.
guys, and how long do you think it will take for bookmakers to BAN your account if you make 15-25% per month? even if we talking about 10-20k bankroll. they will definitely want to destroy your positive account, right? what do you think and what to do with it? for example, if he talks about Stake or other crypto books. thanks 🙏
Disguise them with some parlays, low money. Grow your bank roll and don’t withdraw all of it.
Use different books as well.
“Look messy, but have discipline”
They know you’re sharp so they just limit across the board.
They think you’re a smart bettor and don’t Brant your action.
Good video Jack!
Glad you enjoyed!!
Years ago you could place bets with professional sports books like "Pinnacle" and not have to worry about being banned or limited.unfortunately it is illegal to place bets with the offshore sports books,now that sports gambling has been legalized in the u.s.american sports books are way inferior.
vegas whale has made millions and he bets and lives in vegas they have limited him he showed videos on the emails his agency sent he uses round robins bankroll down when losing up when winning he loses but makes a profit on a group of bets betting 2 teams 3 or 4 combined 800 or lesss a group
it was already illega they use bitcoin now and many closed years ago and i hade funds in one they are still taking usa clients some of them@@alleykat6171
i was kicked out of a ny online because i didnt have current id and reported them to gaming i had only 160 to get they sent ck and closed me other sites dont require id and pay right away on debit card@@alleykat6171
I mean ... Unabated, if you were running a sports book wouldn't you want to reduce your exposure to sharp bettors as well?
That's fine, but they also advertise that ANYONE can come in and win and that you can change your life by winning at sports betting. The reality is, if you win, they'll limit you. If you lose, they'll encourage you to bet more. Doesn't seem fair to advertise that anyone can come in and try to win - but they won't let people play who they think could actually win.
@@Unabated I'm hearing you, you're making some good points. I'd say there's a difference between outright banning someone vs lowering his limit. End of the day, I don't have a horse in this race, because I'm neither bettor nor bookie, but I do hope you make a lot of dough!
I always have Ace Rothstein place all my bets.
The idea of blanket limiting a sharp seems counter-intuitive to the sportsbooks ability to maximize profits, because like you said, nobody is an expert at everything the book has to offer. Given the juice built into all bets, to me it would make more business sense for the books to balance their risk on both sides whenever possible. The books you mentioned that have established limits for all makes so much sense. At the end of the day, if two people walk in wanting to bet $100 on the same exact bet, there's no reason for the books to accept one and not the other.
I think the problem is that if a sharp wants to bet one side, he's getting the best number out of multiple books, and you may never get a guy to walk in and bet that other side--which can probably be had at other places for slightly better odds. That said, in the long run you'd expect the books as a group to win overall, even if a sharp is laying -125 here and another is taking +123 there. Shorter term, the books with the sharpest numbers will come out ahead while the books with some outlier numbers might take some hits.
Please guys I have been betting for over eleven years now but never made a progress. From 2012 till date. Am pleading for an assistant please please guys
I am professional roullete player. the most important thing is good money management, stop loss, take profit for the day and strategy with more that 96% chances"
❓ i kind of get what you are saying.... but if that was true. We would not see guys making millions of bets. They seem to take the bets big or small. Cant win them all. Right?
At my casino, any transaction over $1000 requires an ID and manager approval. Never gonna let a sharp bettor get past us :)
you get booted, I know it for a fact. Been there, done that. NJ fellow here too
If you do 6 mans and win once every week then u won’t be banned but u will be up a big amount
I wonder what the state gamin authorities think about this. If a book, especially on-line started limiting me, I'd document it, and file a complaint with the state gaming authority. And on-line being what it is, I'd rally other skilled sports bettors to do the same, and maybe even push it into the political / media arena, and get the sports books bad press about it.
Unfortunately, regulators say that companies reserve the right to refuse business with bettors as long as they are not discriminating based on race, religion, or ethnicity.
There must be some legal precedent that can be used to defeat the sportsbooks tactics.Regulators are not the law.@@Unabated
Bad press is the way to go, because limiting an business freedoms to choose who they do business with (unless race,religuin,ethnicity) isnt going to fly I think.
@@SuperYxskaftThis is a licensed public accommodation. Some regulation is acceptable. Making them take any legitimate bet on an equal basis seems perfectly reasonable.
@@bbmw9029 Oh dont take me wrong, I despise the entire betting industry, a bunch of vultures that ruins peoples lives and that just wants the benefits without any risks. But I think making a law that forces them to take any bet isnt going to happen, even though its more then reasonable, it should be pretty obvious thats how it should be.
I'd say you're wrong on no one can know every sport.
If you are gambling and can angle one, what's to say you don't have information on others?
Seems reasonable to spread the wealth to even it if working. You say you don't know, but come on now. Don't feed me bs.
I disagree with the futures. I won on the Chiefs winning the super bowl. I knew the Chiefs would be the next back to back super bowl champions.
If you're a time traveler, then yes, futures are a great bet. Godspeed with your travels.
I’d straighten the U logo on the wall. Brand equity is still being grown.
Easy to make you when you have an online account. With your sign in, it's like your ID, and it's easy for the software to be alerted and modified to restrict your account. If I were this guy, I'd be making cash bets only at walk up sports books. Then if they started asking for an ID or sweating his live action, I'd send in other people to make my bets for me at the casino walk up book
unlikely make sperate tickets and go to other casinos if you bet big avoid and taxes yes online is tracked and they warn you about GA
Literally no one ever has to worry about this bc the sports books don’t lose lol and never will. My new opinion is no one is a professional sports bettor. I used to think so but in this day and age I just think the sports books have the smartest minds in the world working for them and the numbers and lines they put out everyday are simply unbeatable
Most sportsbooks pay the equivalent of $20-25/hr to their risk management staff. The only reason you'd want to take that job is if you couldn't beat them yourself - and that would only lower the talent pool working for the sportsbook even further. The cycle perpetuates from there.
If sportsbooks weren't vulnerable they wouldn't refuse action from sharps.
Wise Man.
Im surprise youve never mention anything about middling. Some sportbooks just limits you for betting like mgm
That’s a separate video:
How to Pit Sportsbooks Against Each Other
th-cam.com/video/wZlmQi1yjtg/w-d-xo.html
@@Unabated that's arbing has nothing to do with middles...
Did you play it or just look at the title?
@@Unabated watched your video twice. Legit doesn't cover what middling is except the Purdue one. Which isn't live middling as well
Now you’re moving the goalposts to live middling. Live arbitrage is not recommended. You’ll often wind up with only one side of the wager accepted.
Same thing happens if you take advantage of their own promos.
What these books are doing has to be illegal, if not it should be.
A cooperation can’t be greedy when they win
Then be stingy when they lose
Abuse the law band you when your not losing especially if you are not cheating
Can’t be punished for be good
Not fair
If you win too much; maybe the book should offer you a job. You seem to know the ins and outs.
I don't bet; I have no money, but I enjoy watching others bet. It seems to give a rush also with no risk.
I've turned down a couple job offers from sportsbooks. Operators notoriously underpay their staff, which is one of the reasons they're beatable in the first place.
How tf is this legal?
This is why I still use a private bookie !
First winning bet a YRFI 😊
IYKYK.
Just use a regular sports book and keep it under a paperwork amount for a win. Then you're anonymous 🤷
Different books have different amounts that trigger needing to see an ID. For instance, Caesars is $1000 placed or cashed in total in a day. The FinCEN guidelines are $3000 for a soft ID check and $10k for a hard ID check, but most books set much lower limits just to KYC.
Why don't you just become a tout or handicapper?
I’ve beaten 2 books kicked out of them now o bet for my mom o tell her what to do 😂 that’s until she gets kicked
Draft Kings made my buddy a platinum member and sends him all kinds of boosts every week it’s crazy. But I can’t do it in my state so I have to stick to the illegal bookie who only pays out in cash. I don’t ask questions.
its cat and mouse!
Sounds like discrimination to me…file lawsuits..
LOL!! HIT GOLDEN NUGGET FOR $14K ON $70 IN BETS IN 2014 AND THEY ARE STLL BUTT HURT ABOUT IT
😂😂😂😂
You should make 3 or 4 account and dont put big amount
Like casinos backing you off if you win.
F them all !
Don’t give them a dime.
Play the long game. They wont boot you if you lose. Its about profit. Not winning everyday let alone draw attention to yourself by wagering large amounts. Thats just arrogant and greedy.
Do sports books still take winners out to the desert and break their legs?
Not with gas prices like this!
@@Unabated 🤣
@@Unabated Ha! Watch out when the manager drives a plug-in EV!
I want to know how to bet on the 2024 election. 🗳️
$500 is nothing.
Sports bets are also a scam. Just like govt, banks, etc.
LOL
Yeah no doubt more laws creates more outlaws.
The old human bookies are better . Can I get a dime on the redskins?
Your on for the redskins
Atlantic City history 🤔 tF
It's true. Sports betting didn't start in Atlantic City until June 27, 2018.
@@Unabated that's still some time ago but most Cities still can't go online more than in person, seem the best response because as if things so wrong why can't all cities bet online but every can tell everyone there wrong for tryna sacrifice the best risk to make anything possible regardless but can't, who saving who from what the average better must do in person betting for there tracking of selfish house odd regardless
Its barely 5 years old in Wisconsin only for in person at the Indian casinos regardless
This taught absolutely zero about betting on sports. What sites to use to research, what types of lines for what sports should a person be looking at and why. Historical data showing why certain markets have been profitable over time. These are the types of topics that teach someone about sports betting. Everyone knows about being limited but that isn’t helping you on anyway with making your picks
Fortunately for you, this isn't our only video.
Parlays on futures bets is how I’ve made a living for twenty years.
didnt know you can parlay that but it was vegas only or offshore many years ago
Can you give me an example kind sir?
@@decoyaardvark2828an example? The problem with that is without knowing my bank or how much I was trying to win it wouldn’t mean anything. And if I told you how much I’m trying to win this season you’d think I was a fantasist.
So instead I will just give a few of the teams I shall be betting next week in parlays to win their leagues or be promoted if stated : (all markets from Bet365 which is the easiest bookie to beat at this)
Man City Derby /Bolton Willem II Parma Real Madrid Inter Hornchurch Yeovil Needham Young Boys Ferencvarosi FCSB LA Clippers (division) Stenhousemuir Falkirk. I’m actually trading all those markets and many more.
@@rogerrosen2323I’ve often wondered if you can parlay futures in the USA since I never read anything about it. It would explain a lot if you can’t.
dont know what you mean i do know a few pros are winning in vegas big time as the whale who sent me messages and videos he uses a round robin and other facors such a s a team must win 1 of 3 in baseball and he raises bet if it loses the first game till wins he beys groups and makes a huge profit over time or short time@@decoyaardvark2828
If you are betting $500 on a single bet at a single sports book you have no common sense to start with. What you must do is SPREAD your risk across 5 sports books. So you never go higher that $100. You must also be seen to be LOSING significant amounts on a sportsbook. You do this in rotation. While picking up profits on another sports book.
This keeps them thinking you are just a lucky bettor. I've been able to win thousands over the years doing this and stay under the radar.
Greedy bettors with no sense will of course be stopped.
Totally agree lol especially if you live in vegas
Vegas sportsbook dont care
@@WONANDONESPORTS true lol
I been working for las vegas sportsbokks.since 2017 and i can tell ypu they limit no one
Great plan. One question, when you’re betting in excess of say $1000, $2000, then what?
If I had a pound every time said there’s this one trick to not get limited, I could retire.
even if you win you are still a loser
Like casinos backing you off if you win.
F them all !
Don’t give them a dime.