I must admit....i also hate modernism ....we grew up old school...Latin Mass...its in our hearts . It will never vanish from our beings , no matter how hard the modernists try to make us Protestants ....we are not Protestants and we will never be . We are Catholic . We speak Catholic .
Thank you to Bp. Sanborn and Mr. Heiner for taking time to educate about Abp. Lefebvre's back and forth. His zigzags are evidence of confusion after VC2. St. John Fisher, pray for us and Bishops Sanborn, Selway and Fliess.
hello and thank you for all these videos. Special thanks to the interviewer, who speaks so clearly and intelligibly, and synthetically (even for a french guy :) )
I always miss these interviews.. can you please let me know where to find when they are broadcasted day and time.. Thank you very much Fr. Darrell Roman
Father, do you have a TH-cam subscription? They give advance notice for these and you can request Bp. Sanborn’s talks, lectures, etc. A few minutes before it airs, they’ll send you an alert. There’s no certain day or time, apparently! Example, I’m listening six hours after the fact. I was at work. JMJ, Marie
That's right - tracing just "the Latin Mass" without lookong for the whole the Truth was called by +Bp Dolan: latinomasism - brand new religion but still not the Catholic one. Deo gratias
I find these interviews very interesting. As a recent convert and former SSPX goer whose priest tried to seduce me, spiritually abuse me, and leave my marriage, I am now trying to truly understand the SSPX and see all the problems with them.
@kimberHD45 Yes, to Diocese and SSPX. Diocese just let SSPX deal with it. SSPX did move priest overseas (apparently, this is common). But, that's it .....
Thank you, Bishop Sanborn. As a layman, l have few options for the Tridentine Mass within a 2 hour drive each way. One is the SSPX. The other is diocesan. Is going to the SSPX for Holy Mass a bad idea?
If you listen regularly to Bp. Sanborn, Fr. Cekada, to Novus Ordo Watch or True Restoration...you will soon learn to NEVER APPROACH DOUBTFUL SACRAMENTS!
To attend Mass with the SSPX, where they place the name of Bergoglio into the Canon, declaring him to be the Pope is to give truth to a lie. It's at best, gravely imprudent. Naturally, diocesan, also labours under the same defect and even worse, unless it was to be celebrated by a much older priest, it would be of doubtful validity.
He would tell you to avoid any mass which is offered “una cum” with Bergoglio (that is, which names him in the Canon). And if there is a non-“una cum” Mass available to you, make sure it is being offered by an actual priest with actual/valid orders. There are those who were “ordained” by bishops consecrated in the new (Paul VI) rite of episcopal consecration, which substantially altered the form of the sacrament, rendering it invalid.
November 21 1974 Lefevre Declaration against Truth changes with The Times etc Thank You Lord for Maryanne born November 21 first video she made for me on my 68 birthday on Saint Louis Feast Day Thank You Lord for Mrs Martina visit on November 21 her phone call to her church and for her son who made another video
Sometimes I wonder whether some of these priests from the SPPX do not mention or have not mentioned the name of the Peronist or any of his predecessor in the canon. Impossible to prove but I am sure there is more than one who doesn't.
Those are crypto-Sedes, they do exist, but I feel I would go mad in a situation where you serve an organization that acknowledges an authority as a true Pope, but you personally hold that he is not.
One would think so, but the Society has been engaged in cult-like thinking for so long, these priests have probably compartmentalised their thinking long ago. @winterman7559
Yes, there are, I know for a fact of at least two. I’m sure there are more. That man was not mentioned at either of my parents’ funerals, held very low-key, semi-secret during the height of the c-sickness in a blue state that was crazy.
And I am very curious to see what will happen with these Bishops being consecrated. All the SSPX pundits are hopeful the consecrations will happen. I just don't see how Rome will simply give the SSPX what they want.
We see controled oposition in politics everywhere, also in the media. It would be great if your excellency could talk about the possibility that archbishop Lefevre was in fact controled, because it seems that he neutralized greatly the reaction of many true catholics, not willingly? who knows... The bishop who ordained and consacrated archbishop Lefevre was discovered to be a freemason
We shouldn't engage in conspiratorial thinking with no evidence. Even if Archbishop Lefebvre's consecrator was a Freemason, it would have 0 practical impact upon him, nor the legitimacy of his orders. The Archbishop was misled, misguided and conflicted-but controlled, I don't think so.
@juanvalinas4813 TH-cam keeps deleting my comments on this, but we shouldn't give air to such conspiracy: it does little good. Moreover, it doesn't seem probable. Archbishop having or having not been consecrated has no real relevance to the Archbishop himself unless he was aware of the connection before said rite. Furthermore, it would have 0 impact upon the validity of the sacrament (read Fr. Cekad's article on the matter). Think logically about it. If you were Paul VI and you wanted to control the oppsition, and you had an Archbishop who was constantly seeking your approval and blessing to work inside the "Church", that would be a surefire way to control them, rather than suspending said prelate as he did. The FSSP and the other indult groups...now that's controlled.
@@mariekatherine5238 We don’t know anyone’s souls, that is true. However, when you look at how things have played out in the Church, it is not a rash judgment. When there is one individual fighting against the tide, he/she is made out to be a lunatic. Once a second person joins in, it gains much more credibility. Bp Sanborn made the argument that Heresy is the worst of all sins. The world has glossed over this, and we become distracted by shiny objects such as gay marriage, abortion, etc. It can be analogous to a game of 3 card Monty. Although these are true issues, most have taken there eye off the ball.
You mean not Latin Catholic. Many eastern rites have married priests. However the Latin church does not permit it. It is good that we oppose it but it is not intrinsically wrong.
What does the Bishop think aboit Bishop Pierre Roy's statement that the confessor of Abp Lefebvre told him many times he stopped using false pope name in canon after 1988 consecrations?
I'm guessing that Bishop Sanborn would say that's gratifying to read, if true. However, in the practical order, it's actually more tragic that he kept such a view as a private opinion and didn't publicly make the declaration of sedevacantism. He didn't do so but retained the position of R&R until his death in 1991, despite believing to the contrary.
MHT keeps hitting it out of the park!!! Thanks for all you are doing!!! A blessed Ember week to all!!🙏🙏
I must admit....i also hate modernism ....we grew up old school...Latin Mass...its in our hearts . It will never vanish from our beings , no matter how hard the modernists try to make us Protestants ....we are not Protestants and we will never be . We are Catholic . We speak Catholic .
Thank you your Excellency.
Love these videos!
May The Divine Heart have Mercy on us. God Bless to all in this Advent season.
Thank you to Bp. Sanborn and Mr. Heiner for taking time to educate about Abp. Lefebvre's back and forth. His zigzags are evidence of confusion after VC2. St. John Fisher, pray for us and Bishops Sanborn, Selway and Fliess.
hello and thank you for all these videos. Special thanks to the interviewer, who speaks so clearly and intelligibly, and synthetically (even for a french guy :) )
I always miss these interviews.. can you please let me know where to find when they are broadcasted day and time.. Thank you very much Fr. Darrell Roman
Father, do you have a TH-cam subscription? They give advance notice for these and you can request Bp. Sanborn’s talks, lectures, etc. A few minutes before it airs, they’ll send you an alert. There’s no certain day or time, apparently! Example, I’m listening six hours after the fact. I was at work.
JMJ, Marie
Sorry that I missed this one, live.
2:20 😅😅😅😅😅😂
ZIG-ZAG and FLIP-FLOP. Amen!
That's right - tracing just "the Latin Mass" without lookong for the whole the Truth was called by +Bp Dolan: latinomasism - brand new religion but still not the Catholic one. Deo gratias
Indulterers was another one someone told me 😂
I find these interviews very interesting. As a recent convert and former SSPX goer whose priest tried to seduce me, spiritually abuse me, and leave my marriage, I am now trying to truly understand the SSPX and see all the problems with them.
Which priest was it?
@MarktheShark98 I don't want to put here publicly. If you want to send me an email address, we can chat that way.
Sounds suspicious, did you report that? To whom?
@kimberHD45 Yes, to Diocese and SSPX. Diocese just let SSPX deal with it. SSPX did move priest overseas (apparently, this is common). But, that's it .....
Thank you, Bishop Sanborn. As a layman, l have few options for the Tridentine Mass within a 2 hour drive each way. One is the SSPX. The other is diocesan. Is going to the SSPX for Holy Mass a bad idea?
If you listen regularly to Bp. Sanborn, Fr. Cekada, to Novus Ordo Watch or True Restoration...you will soon learn to NEVER APPROACH DOUBTFUL SACRAMENTS!
To attend Mass with the SSPX, where they place the name of Bergoglio into the Canon, declaring him to be the Pope is to give truth to a lie. It's at best, gravely imprudent. Naturally, diocesan, also labours under the same defect and even worse, unless it was to be celebrated by a much older priest, it would be of doubtful validity.
He would tell you to avoid any mass which is offered “una cum” with Bergoglio (that is, which names him in the Canon). And if there is a non-“una cum” Mass available to you, make sure it is being offered by an actual priest with actual/valid orders. There are those who were “ordained” by bishops consecrated in the new (Paul VI) rite of episcopal consecration, which substantially altered the form of the sacrament, rendering it invalid.
The sspx is doubtful too?
Not as my granddaughter would say @@PaulTuttle-wb9cu
November 21 1974 Lefevre Declaration against Truth changes with The Times etc
Thank You Lord for Maryanne born November 21 first video she made for me on my 68 birthday on Saint Louis Feast Day
Thank You Lord for Mrs Martina visit on November 21 her phone call to her church and for her son who made another video
Sometimes I wonder whether some of these priests from the SPPX do not mention or have not mentioned the name of the Peronist or any of his predecessor in the canon. Impossible to prove but I am sure there is more than one who doesn't.
Those are crypto-Sedes, they do exist, but I feel I would go mad in a situation where you serve an organization that acknowledges an authority as a true Pope, but you personally hold that he is not.
One would think so, but the Society has been engaged in cult-like thinking for so long, these priests have probably compartmentalised their thinking long ago. @winterman7559
To say nothing of the sheer cowardice of it.
Yes, there are, I know for a fact of at least two. I’m sure there are more. That man was not mentioned at either of my parents’ funerals, held very low-key, semi-secret during the height of the c-sickness in a blue state that was crazy.
@@tommastroianni641 Before you say cowardice, be careful. It is priests you’re accusing and don’t know the particulars in every case.
His Excellency is allowed to say something like that about Passaic, NJ...if it was something about neighboring Wood-Ridge, dem's fightin' words! 😂
And I am very curious to see what will happen with these Bishops being consecrated. All the SSPX pundits are hopeful the consecrations will happen. I just don't see how Rome will simply give the SSPX what they want.
We see controled oposition in politics everywhere, also in the media. It would be great if your excellency could talk about the possibility that archbishop Lefevre was in fact controled, because it seems that he neutralized greatly the reaction of many true catholics, not willingly? who knows... The bishop who ordained and consacrated archbishop Lefevre was discovered to be a freemason
We shouldn't engage in conspiratorial thinking with no evidence. Even if Archbishop Lefebvre's consecrator was a Freemason, it would have 0 practical impact upon him, nor the legitimacy of his orders. The Archbishop was misled, misguided and conflicted-but controlled, I don't think so.
I find this HIGHLY UNLIKELY! It’s quite an accusation, in fact. Beware of rash judgment.
@juanvalinas4813 TH-cam keeps deleting my comments on this, but we shouldn't give air to such conspiracy: it does little good. Moreover, it doesn't seem probable. Archbishop having or having not been consecrated has no real relevance to the Archbishop himself unless he was aware of the connection before said rite. Furthermore, it would have 0 impact upon the validity of the sacrament (read Fr. Cekad's article on the matter). Think logically about it. If you were Paul VI and you wanted to control the oppsition, and you had an Archbishop who was constantly seeking your approval and blessing to work inside the "Church", that would be a surefire way to control them, rather than suspending said prelate as he did. The FSSP and the other indult groups...now that's controlled.
@@mariekatherine5238 We don’t know anyone’s souls, that is true. However, when you look at how things have played out in the Church, it is not a rash judgment. When there is one individual fighting against the tide, he/she is made out to be a lunatic. Once a second person joins in, it gains much more credibility. Bp Sanborn made the argument that Heresy is the worst of all sins. The world has glossed over this, and we become distracted by shiny objects such as gay marriage, abortion, etc. It can be analogous to a game of 3 card Monty. Although these are true issues, most have taken there eye off the ball.
Made it
Oh no.....not ordination of married men ..thats not Catholic
You mean not Latin Catholic. Many eastern rites have married priests. However the Latin church does not permit it. It is good that we oppose it but it is not intrinsically wrong.
Far worse was delegates from the Vatican denying the bodily resurrection of Our Lord Jesus Christ.
Worse still was what they said about the resurrection.
@@jimmyhun91 definitely
peter was married
What does the Bishop think aboit Bishop Pierre Roy's statement that the confessor of Abp Lefebvre told him many times he stopped using false pope name in canon after 1988 consecrations?
I'm guessing that Bishop Sanborn would say that's gratifying to read, if true. However, in the practical order, it's actually more tragic that he kept such a view as a private opinion and didn't publicly make the declaration of sedevacantism. He didn't do so but retained the position of R&R until his death in 1991, despite believing to the contrary.
@jimmyhun91 yes, tragic!
@@jimmyhun91 1991 was nowhere near as evident and horrid as nearly 2025.