A Theory of a System for Educators and Managers

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 33

  • @jeremycornish-ford2435
    @jeremycornish-ford2435 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I love this man's ideals. Quality, to me is making the world better.

  • @alexsmith-ob3lu
    @alexsmith-ob3lu 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thank you for posting this video!
    America could learn “new” educational systems/techniques from Finland, Japan, and pre-ww2 Germany.
    Finland puts their students into school for only a fraction of the time that America does, yet they have the highest rates of academic ability. And that is despite not having any homework assigned to Finnish students, no regular testing and only one exam to pass all of high school.
    Japanese schools teach home economics, mannerisms and other basic life skills on top of academics. Something that American public schools no longer teach.
    Even though it was the Germans (Prussians) who created our modern day schooling system of lectures. Pre-WW2 Germany saw an educational system changed to focus on more practical skills, development of morals/character, and athleticism. American public schools have not only declined in academic lecture/exam performance. American schools also don’t teach anything about physical health or practical hands on skills anymore.

  • @TheMijori23
    @TheMijori23 13 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    The ability to learn how to learn is the real value education can give children (Langford).

  • @lastmansleeping5433
    @lastmansleeping5433 8 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    When something against the norm more than 50 years ago is still against the norm, that's how you know people are intentionally ignoring it.

    • @dariuscollin6815
      @dariuscollin6815 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i guess Im asking randomly but does any of you know of a tool to log back into an instagram account?
      I was stupid lost the account password. I appreciate any help you can offer me

    • @dariuscollin6815
      @dariuscollin6815 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Kyler Jakob I really appreciate your reply. I got to the site through google and Im trying it out now.
      Takes quite some time so I will reply here later with my results.

    • @dariuscollin6815
      @dariuscollin6815 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Kyler Jakob It worked and I actually got access to my account again. I am so happy:D
      Thanks so much, you saved my account !

    • @kylerjakob5567
      @kylerjakob5567 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Darius Collin Glad I could help xD

    • @m13v2
      @m13v2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      they do not ignore it willingly. it‘s system 1 thinking. (see „thinking, fast and slow“). even if you know about that, i assume the thought that we are not as rational beings as we hope to be, and also that most things are out of our control, scares people away. interestingly, i noticed that companies/people who were forced to realise that despite their best efforts, things totally got out of control, were more successful in implementing tqm/lean/agile.
      the other, less cruel approach is training: 5 whys is a good entry level kata (people rarely even ask one why :)) and the improvement kata, the pro level kata.

  • @valetudo1974
    @valetudo1974 13 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great Video...Thank you for posting...

  • @2enchant
    @2enchant 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    As a devout follower of the teachings of the Most Honorable Elijah Muhammad, I find this information to be mind blowing.

  • @NeoMandalore
    @NeoMandalore ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I don't know when this was filmed. Looks like the 80s, maybe 90s. Either way, it's clear the education system hasn't learned anything since then. Standardized testing still hangs over everything, stifling real learning.

  • @mugokiberenge8818
    @mugokiberenge8818 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the sharing

  • @BeWellr
    @BeWellr 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    9:15-10:45 why reductionist, sum of parts is < wholism of a system

    • @ExaltedDuck
      @ExaltedDuck 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Synergistic interaction. The parts benefit from each others' presence. To draw an example from my past that also reinforces Deming's point about the danger of numeric goals, an operations manager was tasked with reducing operating costs. He found an alternative raw material used in about 10 products. It was tested by the QC department in 3 or 4 of them on a lab scale and shown to work. Fast,foraward 9 months,two of the products that used to always pass first inspection were required 2-3 adjusemts on each batch to meet viscosity requirents. But because he reduced the cost a few percent,he achieved his goal. Passing QC first time - inexplicably - was a goal assigned to the QC department. So the negative consequences were irrelevant to the operations manager. He met his goal.

    • @johnx911
      @johnx911 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ExaltedDuck but QC would report the rework, ID the cause of repeated rework, and increased cost and delays and rework. Ops mgr then busy if whole cost ^^^^

  • @HerdingDogRescuer
    @HerdingDogRescuer 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Is Demming related to Slingblade?

  • @cartergomez5390
    @cartergomez5390 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't see the time stamp so I'm not watching it!

  • @nosapience
    @nosapience 11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Poor old Deming, still I do love Russ doing his 'best automobile' analogy for understanding systems - arse backwards in hindsight. Plus the presenter has more cheese than a French fridge, but worth sitting through that, to get to the Russ Nugetts

    • @honorbean2973
      @honorbean2973 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Jack Welch really nailed it though, right!? GE and Boeing really hit it out of the park!

    • @Loachie90
      @Loachie90 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@honorbean2973 yeah Jack Welch and his six sigma scam

  • @BuildAProWorkShop
    @BuildAProWorkShop 11 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    That smurf man, it's so random.

    • @kirstenalexa1025
      @kirstenalexa1025 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yeah what's up w/the smurf?

    • @Loachie90
      @Loachie90 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The smurf didn’t add quality, why did they do it

    • @melvin_0bviously
      @melvin_0bviously 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That thing makes me feel like this was a parallel universe

  • @tshkrel
    @tshkrel 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Psycho-babble . . . where are the philosophers?