AFU Situation Worsens in New York Acute Risk of Encirclement | Lessons of War
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.ย. 2024
- JOIN this channel on Patreon to get access to perks such as exclusive videos, livestreams and more: / weebunion
PAYPAL DONATIONS:
www.paypal.me/...
Thanks for watching! And have a great day! :D
Find me here: linktr.ee/weeb...
Map list:
Fortifications: www.google.com...
Suriyakmaps: www.google.com...
My map: www.google.com...
Deepstatemap: deepstatemap.l...
Twitter: / weebunionwar
Telegram: t.me/WeebUnionWar
Disclaimer: If you are sensitive to the topics of this channel or get triggered by the contents of my videos I advice you to not watch my channel and avoid the subject all-together.
Russia is not our enemy. From Australia with love❤
You do a different place every time you copy and paste that. At least you change something unlike other bots though
@@arostwocents System.out.println("You do a different place every time you copy and paste that. At least you change something unlike other bots though");
0:19 - Urozhaine
6:13 - Vodyane
6:36 - Maksymil'yanivka
7:12 - Niu-York
Thanks Bypassing speculation however well intended
The brilliance of your work, and it's importance increases in magnitude as events progress, many thanks.
Thank you!
The beginning of the end of the Slowjansk-Kramatorsk-Kostjantynivka-line.
Russia is not my enemy from USA
America and Americans not our enemy it’s just USA fed, however USA fed is also American people enemy as well
Ukraine is winning by advancing backwards while Russia is losing by retreating forward.
This joke never gets old😂
Also what happened to these two veterans in your name? Are they alive
@@danielmerhi4456 Bieber sacrificed his life defending Bakhmut during the ukrainian summer offensive.
He fought like a tiger, till his last breath.
Celou dobu jsem to věděl
YRussia advance from Kiev to Donbas in east direction 700km
And now they advance in last 12months from Donbas to west 20-30.
Thats a winning?!
LMFAO
@@michalzajic2555 Hmm... AFU lost 1.3 million troops up to now. That is definitely defeat
Re. NY battalion, Cassad posted an Ukie complaint that his battalion in Toretsk area had 22 able men left. That's 3 squads worth, not even a company. With these numbers I can easily see "2 battalions" surrounded. In reality it's more like 1 company's worth.
When I was a kid, 22 x men wasn't even a platoon!
10 - 11 men per section .. 3 x sections to a platoon!
No coverage in the uk 🇬🇧 at all 😮
First lesson in war- media control. Look at Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan. Nato has learnt there
A total news black-out, block-out all over the European continent and other free western countries. The same re: Palestine, Israel and the Middle East.
"The first casualty in war, is truth" - Aeschylus
same in the netherlands
Lol if they reported the truth, the emergencies hotline will be overwhelmed with mass mental & emotional meltdowns 😂😂 all over NATO.
Here they just occasionaly "inform" how conflict is not moving anywhere and similar bullshit. Time to time some infor how Russians captured some unimportant village with huge losses.
Concerning the workforce, I would like to correct a few elements. In fact, we have a good example of this with a discussion between General Bonaparte who returned victorious from the Egyptian campaign and another French General who had been defeated in Italy. The second General indicates that he was beaten because his army was outnumbered. To which Bonaparte replied that it was normal because “it is always the most numerous who win”. The other General then points out that Bonaparte's army was outnumbered in Egypt, but had won. Bonaparte then responds that this is normal because "it is always the most numerous who win"...
Faced with incomprehension, Bonaparte then explained one of the three basic military principles, namely that one should not take the overall number, but the number on a point.
In fact, the three principles complement each other: concentration of efforts, economy of forces and freedom of action. The concentration of efforts will consist of analyzing the entire enemy force, and concentrating its efforts on the weakest point.
Let's imagine that we have 6 very small abcdef groups and the enemy has 3 (ABC) but very strong. If the enemy's point B is the weakest, we will attack him. But be careful: we are definitely not going to attack point B with our abcdef groups because otherwise, the enemy's groups A and C will come to the rescue!
We are therefore going to attack enemy group A with our small group a, C with our group f and we are going to attack the enemy's weak group (B) with bcde.
The goal of our groups a and f is not to defeat A and C which is unthinkable in any case, but simply to prevent A and C from coming to B's help.
For this we must "save our forces" (2nd point of military logic): we will calculate the minimum that we must engage against A and C to contain them, and put everything else against B. If we do not put enough forces against A and C, these two groups will break free and help B and if we put too many forces against A and C, we risk having difficulty defeating B.
The 3rd point is that we must maintain “freedom of action”, therefore a sort of freedom of movement. Because when B is crushed by our small groups bcde, we will have to analyze the situation of a against A and of f against C in order to determine which enemy group we must focus our effort on, either depending on the weakness of one of the enemy groupe or depending on the difficulty of our groups a or f to maintain themselves against A and C.
For the moment the Russians are constantly maneuvering while the Ukrainians are losing their "freedom of action" because as soon as they move to help, they create a "hole" and the Russians rush into it. For the Ukrainians the question is therefore permanent: the Russians are advancing on village X. OK, but do we go there, or do we protect village Y, where we are? If the Ukrainians stay on Y, then X will fall and if they move to protect X, Y will fall.
As for the concentration of efforts, now it can only be on the Russian side because the concentration of efforts, as said previously, does not only consist of attacking a point, but also of preventing the arrival of help. We must therefore maintain our freedom of action while disturbing the enemy one. However, overall, if the Ukrainians concentrate their efforts on one point, they will no longer have the necessary manpower to fix the Russians on the other points.
The breaking point is approaching...
Thanks for the well informed update as usual. As far as the collapse of the front goes, I am reminded of Hemingway's words: gradually then suddenly.
Hello, from Brazil! Your work is great, man! I watch your vídeos everyday and I keep informed about this war. Thank you.
Ukraine would have been demolished even if they had concentrated all forces in 1 location.
There would have been a chance though. If you can absorb enough losses and just keep attacking, eventually the line you are facing will break. Study ww2.
@@arostwocents No the Ukrainians would have failed no matter what. I' saying this bcz they still don't have enough forces and the Russians have plenty of reserves. Moreover all the way down to Crimea there are a couple of lines of fortifications so it was ' Mission impossible ' for the AFU. IMAO.
Ironically concentrating their forces in one place would have made them easy picking for RUAF.
@@arostwocentstrue
It’s all possible, just the losses
Need to remember ww2 losses in the eastern front was like 10-20k dudes per day during harsh battles
That kind of manpower doesn’t exist anymore in Russia or Ukraine
@@arostwocents Bro they basically did during the greatest summer counter offensive of all time. They attacked one stupid town with 80,000 men and made 10km headway
Thanks Weeb!
Concentrations of troops are also vulnerable in this war because of the high quality surveillance information available to both sides.
Thanks for the daily updates weeb !
These 2 batallions are not in the centre, but in the total pocket. That claim may well be true
Yes! 👍
According to militaryland there is only one battalion, the 425th seperate assault battalion, in the whole of New York.
@@dragonmartijn вопрос не в батальонах, а в количестве. А они похоже решили сдаться и сберечь свои жизни. Воюют братья, а кто то шекели подсчитывает.
I keep hearing Ukraine's battalions are far from full strength, so two battalions of current Ukraine might really fit in that small area. I like how Weeb described the 400 "encircled" Russians though 🤣 "Crossing the river, not giving a shit" 🤣
@@Lina_Antoniou 🤣🤣🤣
🇺🇸🤝🇷🇺 Trump announced his intention to ease or lift sanctions against Russia if he wins - Bloomberg
The sanctions were a boon for Russia. Why would they rush back to trading with countries they don't need and don't respect Russia?
Too late and too little. Much more will be needed to convince Russia to stop its army. At this point too much blood has been shed and the objective remains a strategic agreement regarding the deployed nuclear forces.
@@nursebruno Ru will not stop her army. At least not before Karkov and Odessa are liberated.
Haven’t the sanctions actually benefitted Russia? Economy still robust, more diversified trade, de-dollarisation and fast developing BRICS partnership? Let’s see how other ”sovereign” states react?
Even if Russia will try to stop, I predict fail. In UA there are a lot of people like Azov. They of course will continue, and it means Russia will be forced to response. I remind, already was attempt to stop everything - Minsk agreement. They failed. Also let’s remember WW2. Officially it stopped in 1945, right? But exactly there it continued for next 11 years with loses of over 300k people. Because all pro-German UA forces continued to fight. What is important - it continue on territory which USSR fully controlled. Now imagine whole uncontrolled country with direct Western support…
So, this is events for next ~10 years.
P.S.
Trump again lying. When he came to power, de facto it is he started this war of sanctions. And secretly sent weapons to UA.
Good morning Weeb!
Excellent analysis as always 😊
thanks weeb union
Russia is not our enemy. From the Global South with Love. ❤
a lot of great progress by the russians, small breakthrough turn into big bugle on the big map, and the big bugle will turn into big arrow. be ready.
Those two battalions might be understrength. That claim is not completely absurd.
I like your explanation and independence of the video's . I must say that here in the Netherlands nothing is more said about the war in the media.
Its not the main story anywhere but they do say stuff here in the UK so I imagine it's the same there. I doubt only BBC have covered the recruitment crisis or the men escaping Ukraine
World service is all of Europe as well isn't it?
Anche in Italia poca roba, si enfatizza solo gli attacchi a struttura civili per fare propaganda come al solito di parte
Thank you
WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEBBBBBBBB ! tell us the news ! oh right, you just did.. thanks
Thanks again.
Thanks weeb!! Watching from Western Canada 🇨🇦
eccellente esposizione.
Thanks for your insights and updates your videos have actually helped me improve my strategies. I have learned a lot
Thank you Weeb, great updates.
8:10 LOL, thank you for calling out ukrainian bs
400 Zetas (Sparta Sequel)😅
Thanks, much appreciated
Please take a look at what the Russian Big Arrow offensive to occupy all of Ukraine before the rainy season, might look like. General Gerasimov has succeeded to coordinate the capture of NATO's defensive lines, with the collapse of NATO's organized armed forces. So the Big Arrow will follow.
It's operational encirclement of two Ukrainian battalions east of New-York not in New-York itself. As usual for Ukrainian army at this point these battalions exist mostly on paper with no more than 30% of nominal manpower.
This is about as bad as the certain people that listen to old rock and roll and country songs and review them and cry and act like they're shocked
Good Day to everyone. I hope this comment won't be deleted by TH-cam.
This comment is rated plus good by the double plus good YT gestapo. Carry on citizen, your chocolate rations have been increased to 50g per day.
Super Job, gracias.!!!!😊
Gm everyone
Thank you man, best as always. You should get paid for your work
The 3:1 advantage doesn’t take into account force multipliers. If you have a higher and stronger force multiplier ratio you don’t need the 3:1 advantage.
Russia, make us proud.
Amount of fortifications used in this war is crazy, i mean this has being noticed a lot of times by now, but it is still mind blowing. Hope it will be over soon
I heard Surovikan line is the largest defensive line built in human history. It could be longer than the great wall of china
I see a map of Croatia 😅😅😅 7:13
Thanks :)
How about Casiv Yar?
New York is Russian 😅🇷🇺💯
_nerd mode on_
More correctly "Neu Jork", it is settlement founded by Germans in 19 century with reference to Jork, city near Hamburg.
While New York is reference to British duke of York.
Don't panic Ukraine. Kamala has you're back. On second thought buy lot's of Depends. 😊
Russians are speeding up
🐻💤🔥👍👏👏
Washington post article.......must be true 😂
Them quoting US officials about what US officials told Ukrainian officials is indeed likely to be true.
I wonder, how UA managed to lose 42 million of its population from 52 mil in 1991 to 10 mil in 2024 ?
? I check and ukraine population is 38 mil nowaday not 10 mil. They lost like 14 million 'only'
What type of war this is like fight between cat and mouse
Yes
I think that except for Mariupol, we have not seen a real encirclement in this war
CAPITULATION INCOMING
YT Gestapo is always on the watch , 24x7
Protecting your feefees so you don't have too. YT is double plus good
Go figure that comment didn't get deleted
Go figure that comment survived
Syrsky says that russians advance towards pokrovsk even with heavy losses 😅
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
AFU -> SNAFU.
You are not correct. While Ukraine was conducting her southern offensive last year it was Russia that started the offensive in the center of the frontline. This was to split the Ukrainian military force to two areas. It was a successful military operation.
👍
"New york"
Clown is sick.
Very good analysis. But I watched Russian news from the battlefield and they say they dis surround those Ukrainian troops.
❤
I wonder how the comedian feels now?
👍👍👍
Disagree: without proper counter Drhone technology concentrarion of troops and offensive is just a big grave yard.
Not first! (This comment will probably be censored)
😊
A russia não é minha inimiga do 🇧🇷
👍👍👍🙏🙏🙏
ukies have poorly trained troops......
How many russians already dyed for those 5 farms? 1000? 2000? 3000 maybe? More? Who knows.
Definitely less than Ukraine
You may count them in battle field
Farms the Russians will inherit for thousands years
into what color?
@@_kitaes_ black. Deep black. And blue and yellow
Russian claims are far differebt than Ukrajian ones dim diim
How long can Russia loose so much men,for meters to advance...
How long can Ukraine keep sending raw conscripts to temporarily hold those not strategically important locations?
Russia has a labour shortage, Ukraine has a much more serious labour shortage made worse by men avoiding the recruiters.
Trump 2024
🗽🕊 Where is Joe Biden ??? 🤔
.
The trenchhopping war has turned out to be of more importance lately. Russia has chunk by chunk gained a substantial amount of territory in Donbas and at least broken through 2 major lines of defence. Reason is they could establish quiet constant drone surveillance of up to 20 km behind UAF lines and are able to identify weak spots in the defence this way. Also this allows to attack with minimal forces, avoiding the gathering of larger troops with the risk of discovery. UAF working hard on countermeasures against surveillance drones, but so far nothing really works. And UAF forces are quite attrited and also made a number of tactical mistakes. Nobody knows what the purpose really was of the Kharkiv offensive, but in one aspect it‘s been successful: It binds 12.000 - 30.000 UAF forces that could fight in Donbas instead. RUAF mostly attack mad max style on motorbikes now, too fast for artillery. UAF uses FPV to fight them what means one drone per one infantryman, but you cannot have drones ready at all times everywhere. Glide bombs are still a major problem for UAF, countermeasure is to destroy as much RUAF air defense as possible in the hope F 16 can suppress them in the future. Ukraine has solved EW jamming of JDAMS, but can glidebomb the Russians only in Kharkiv, there they have destroyed the Russian air defence. UAF is about to have its own land to land missiles with a range of 400 km ready. There’s still the ban for western missiles to be used on Russian territory with exemptions, but the West has helped Ukraine to develop their own. So there will be combined missile and drone attacks according to the Russian tactics on Russian territory. Russia must decide to rearm and maintain air defense in Crimea to protect the bridge and military assets, or accept air superiority of Ukraine and leave only garrison troops in Crimea. The latter is likely, because they know Ukraine can’t invade Crimea, and they have already lost appr. 15 S300/400 batteries in Crimea. We‘ll see how far this all gets for both sides until the US elections.
Air superiority of Ukraine LMAO
For Dennis Ukraine is winning...
😂
What's Danis Danylov saying rn?
Do russians still lose 15:1😅😂
Watched his yesterdays video (I like to check him up from time to time) and from 17 minutes, he spent 3 talking about map changes. Rest were copium garbage showcase of RU losses.
Dinis Danisov
draft-dodging D
First
Omg, 2024 - some people still write “first” 😂 calm down, we are all already became first when our daddies made us with our mommies.
You compare ukrainian sources to russian sources. You still did not learn the lesson
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣400
Nice of Russia to give some of its money to Ukraine so it can buy weapons for its military. LOL " Ukraine to receive $1.5 billion in frozen Russian assets in August, Borrell says The European Union's top diplomat, Josep Borrell, announced on July 22 that Ukraine is expected to receive the first transfer of $1.5 billion in payments from Russian frozen assets at the beginning of August."
The frozen european western assets and companies and planes in russia where also given to russia.
Worth around 390 billion
Russia is getting more by destroying the west economy together with the Global South. That is the best joke that you probably don't know.
Investor seen this action as thievery, this will damaging their trust and they will think twice before doing investment there. Anyway if they stole money from them russia will retaliate by confiscated their asset in russia.
So what.....Russia's gained trillions of dollars of Ukrainian land..
You have posted many comments about those frozen assets, you seem a bit obsessed.
At least those EU clowns have now accepted that they can't steal the funds and will settle for trying to steal their earnings. Lets see how that goes down with other investors in Europe though.
Weeb Union is an idiot!
And still overall map of all Ukraine and frontline looks the same as year ago. It shows well how marginal movements in reality are in big picture. Situation overall is kind of stalemate. Of course a stalemate with a lot of people getting killed. Good example what kind of madness wars are. Russia's attack was so unnecessary.
Основная цель не в захвате территорий, кроме сухопутного моста в Крым. Цель - уничтожение живой силы противника. Ну и обычная для нас бездарность русских генералов играет свою роль несомненно.
You just blind, you just looking for territorial gain buat ignored Ukraine as a whole destroyed. Their country was still functions because aid from allies and the worst of all demographics collapse and destruction of 80~90% energy infrastructure.
You realise russia is currently moving through the most fortified place on the planet right? If not in human history and winning against all of nato, its quite the feat.
Every village, town and city in the donbass has been turned into a fortress, every sheep shed in the middle of nowhere, when you look at the fortifications they've pushed through, you'll realize the front has moved alot, ukr is also running out of fortifications and is also dipping into the undesirable less effective manpower now, forcing people to fight and reserving its proper armies to maintain "order" to keep this sham going longer and depopulate the country before the proper war starts.
In another year ukr will be having manpower shortages, then nato troops will man the borders and then the mission creep will begin to full war, even though it cannot be won.
@@sometimeswitty6849 If Nato would be there, Russians would be moving towards Russia now😂 You see if Nato would be there, air superiority would make things impossible for Russians. Only nuclear arsenal protects Russian troops from that now.
@@user-pg9yu3sd9d I don't speak. Chinese, say it in English if you want me to know what you say👍
hejteru
Don’t believe the hype, since the fall of avdivka Russia has taken only 0.12 percent, of Ukrainian land for 100000 plus casualties do the math on taking the rest lol
Any credible source to support your numbers ?
@@fred4687 What do you think?
@@off6848 I think that Russia is taking casualties but at a much lower rate than Ukraine. There is no source that I trust though to support this or numbers for either side. I did previously consider Mediazona to be a reasonable source but they recently adopted computer modelling to portray numbers more in line with their sponsors narrative.
@@off6848 FYI I try to find honest info from both sides, which is obviously difficult for this conflict. There is a pro Ukr source that recently posted this ...
"Our source in the OP said that currently payments for soldiers killed at the front make up 15% of Ukraine's budget, the figure is constantly growing and forcing the Cabinet to increase spending. To eliminate the budget deficit, the Government is urgently raising taxes and military duty. "
I'll add the name to a new comment to see if it is allowed.
@@fred4687 Most of the actual Russians are fighting in the north most of Donetsk and Zhaporizeh front is eastern Ukrainians and Crimean's that were absorbed into the Russian army eventually. People were saying 200,000 Russians KIA back when Russia only officially had 190,000 on the map it just in febuary surged up to 700,000 where as Ukraine has been maintaining 600k to 700k steadily with 6 mobilizations.
I think Russia is maybe 100k casualties and Ukraine is 1.2 million
It really is that bad when you look into the facts Russia has always been at least 7:1 kill ratio steadily