Thanks for the video, I agree you should all play the game your way... Leaders do serve a purpose as they hold meetings to increase productivity. Leaders with their own office increase team efficiency by 25%, ♞
I hope I didn't say that they serve no purpose, because I didn't mean that. They are clearly useful, and as said, as soon as I have money rolling in, I make sure to have them. Extra team efficiency is nice, but it's a degree of min/maxing that I think most people probably won't have to worry about, especially if you take care of your employees in other ways. After a few years, most teams won't really have trouble getting work done on time. Anyway, for me, the best thing about leaders is the ability to hold meetings. That's all I care about, because I really like the blanket experience gain the team members gain to all of their skills.
Though, to expound upon that slightly, I think meetings are most useful if you're building a team of people that you want to do a little bit of everything (and I'm not saying that's a good way to play). If you're going with a strict division of labor, like designers just do design, programmers just do programming, etc., then meetings probably aren't that big of a deal (though still good).
One of these days I'll have one of these 700-employee companies that I see other people talking about, but I'm a micromanager at heart, so I like to keep a pretty close eye on my workers. How are you all playing?
Thanks for the video, I agree you should all play the game your way... Leaders do serve a purpose as they hold meetings to increase productivity. Leaders with their own office increase team efficiency by 25%, ♞
I hope I didn't say that they serve no purpose, because I didn't mean that. They are clearly useful, and as said, as soon as I have money rolling in, I make sure to have them. Extra team efficiency is nice, but it's a degree of min/maxing that I think most people probably won't have to worry about, especially if you take care of your employees in other ways. After a few years, most teams won't really have trouble getting work done on time. Anyway, for me, the best thing about leaders is the ability to hold meetings. That's all I care about, because I really like the blanket experience gain the team members gain to all of their skills.
Though, to expound upon that slightly, I think meetings are most useful if you're building a team of people that you want to do a little bit of everything (and I'm not saying that's a good way to play). If you're going with a strict division of labor, like designers just do design, programmers just do programming, etc., then meetings probably aren't that big of a deal (though still good).
@@EdgeOfCasualGaming I auto role all my employees including the founder... Guides on steam!
@@LatNStrategy That's brave. ha! I'm way too much of a micromanager to let the game do anything for me. ;) I admit, it gets a little tedious, though.
Great video! Thanks for the advice!
Thanks for watching this scattershot presentation!
One of these days I'll have one of these 700-employee companies that I see other people talking about, but I'm a micromanager at heart, so I like to keep a pretty close eye on my workers. How are you all playing?