I have a similar unbeatable defense. Me: Isn't it true you're innocent until proven guilty? Judge: Yes. Me: Well since we're having a trial to prove I'm guilty I haven't been proven guilty yet. Therefore I'm innocent and there's no need for a trial. Judge: Case dismissed
My teacher once saved a couple from ruin. He represented an elderly couple who had bought a castle but were having trouble paying the rest of the mortgage due to mrs' temporarily stopping working as a tour guide (illness) and mr making less as a fellow tour guide cause he had to take care of her and had less clients due to post 2008 crash. Bank: we'll take the castle. Old man: I declare bankruptcy. Bank: you can't. My teacher: old man, do you have a business? Old man: yes. My teacher: is the castle part of the tours? Old man: yes. My teacher: do you own it? Old man: yes. My teacher: as per French law my client's small business' corporate assets and debts and my client's private assets and debts are one and the same. My client declare bankruptcy as a business. The court accepted the elderly couple's case, ruled in their favou and spread out the rest of the debt over ten more years. Castle was never seized or sold.
@@CRUSH40RULES lots of old castles get sold iirc, the government doesn't care enough to pay their upkeep as castles are expensive, so selling them to someone the forcing regulations that *they* have to pay upkeep is their better option At least I'm pretty sure it's something like that
i dont mean to be so off topic but does anyone know a method to get back into an instagram account?? I somehow lost the login password. I appreciate any help you can offer me
@@dustinronin3262 maybe you can try calling/mailing Facebook since they own Instagram, otherwise I don't know. Look it up on google or reddit too. Good luck.
I was in court and an 18 year old was in front of the judge for a probation violation. His probation was violated because he didn't get a job. The judge asked, "Why didn't you get a job?" The kid looks straight at the judge with a straight face and said, "I've been fishing, your honor." The whole courtroom, including the judge, erupted into laughter. The judge gave him a second chance to complete his probation.
So part of this kid's probation was to get a job? It's so hard to land a job sometimes, especially for someone who's 18 years old. At least he didn't cause trouble and had a peaceful hobby.
Last story: The guy could have just make an account with a throwaway email and added his mother as a facebook friend there then forget about it, since the final agreement never mentioned that it had to be his own account.
3rd story: Victimizing the Sex offenders and saying it's the women's fault for dressing that way or being in places like that means they are clearly asking for this makes my blood boil! This also portrays men like any chance they get, they can't restrain themselves.
I've had the argument turned the other way around too, where women only dress that way if they want sex and don't care who it's with. I've also had a response to that: "I'm dressed like this out of necessity, since it's damn near impossible to find something that fits and doesn't show a lot of skin, given my body's shape (I'm really short and have two melons, each a good amount larger than my head. My boobs started growing, and growing rapidly at that, when I was 6). I've been doing so since I was 8 or 9, for the same reason. Now, you tell me that that means I was asking for sex, and I'll tell you that I didn't know the first thing about sex back then. You tell me I'm asking for guys to shove their dicks into my body, and I'll tell you that I've got a girlfriend, dicks not included, no dicks required. So you can take your 'asking for it' arguments and shove them up your ass, since your attitude is what's really screaming your desire out to the world, like a billboard plastered with the words 'I want to have multiple strangers put phallic objects into several of my bodily orifices at once'. My clothing does not. My clothing says 'I'm having trouble dealing with a pair of overgrown body parts' and should not be taken to mean anything else. I'd say fuck you, but I want to stay the hell away from your twisted ideas of all topics related to sex and sexual desire"
Wasn't there a woman who made that claim on t.v before? Someone from the government? Can't remember the bitch's name but I think it was part of the Weinstein scandal. I'm with you on this 100% though.
There honestly should be a law that using that defense in a sexual assault case of any form is equivalent to admitting fault, and proves a distinct lack of self-control in the person, making them unfit to enter society after release.
I also think that use of this line is very stupid. It's basically saying that men have self-control of a common dog. If this had been true, the logical thing to do would have been to only allow men in public on a leash and preventively sterilise those who are seen as unfit to reproduce. (Btw. I am not saying that this should be done in reality, because in reality, men can control themselves, obviously.)
Not a lawyer, but my grandpa told me that my dad and his second wife got into it so bad with the he-said/she-said in court, that the judge cursed, asked the officer present "is this really happening right now?", and told them both to "get the hell out of my courtroom and get a divorce". They were in court 'cause his second wife shot him w/ his own handgun, but she claimed that he shot himself while he was cleaning it. Idk what all happened, but my grandpa just referred to the whole thing as the "Year of Hell: Part 2". (Idk what 'Part 1' was, but apparently wife three was 'Part 3')
@@superdupergrover9857 Yeah, who cares about the damn flag? Plus, if the conspiracy theory is that some group has illegitimately supplanted the government and is trying to screw everyone, why would they give up so easily? They seem to think the court would just surrender, instead of painting them as crazy and full of BS.
@@KnakuanaRka I was thinking that as well. Besides, why would the judge necessarily understand the "true" nature of the government they protect? The first thing I would do as the leader(s) of an illegitimate government is tell everyone that I and all of my actions were legitimate. AND the word de-facto exists for a reason. If you're being robbed, just tell the robber his actions are illegal and he'll stop, right?
When researching my family history, I came across a rather amusing argument made by my ancestor when charged with bootlegging during prohibition (hired a very good lawyer in the area, one of the best who was ironically one of the most fervent drys in the community). The case against him was based on his sale of alcohol to an investigator. His defense was that he had specifically instructed the person who turned out to be an investigator that the alcohol was for medicinal uses only, but the investigator stole it anyway. Wasn't even a mistrial, he was found not guilty with that defense XD
I was in court testifying for a family member. The DA was mean mugging my family member the whole time. His lawyer said "Your honor, I object to that stupid look she keeps giving my client" The judge says "Objection sustained". Everyone including the jury laughed.
I don't understand how these people don't realize that document is exactly the reason we can't do that and if they want to argue it doesn't apply to them.....well.....I'd say point out what it that means not to have that protection.
3:03 There is no actual way that the judge allowed a felon get out for a day just to get married. People will do anything for their beliefs. That is one great lawyer.
The opposite, a wanted felon surfaces to get married-one they closed on the church after the felon groom entered and arrested him at the altar before his bride walked. To say the bride was livid was an understatement. Lawsuits flew. They now wait until after the couple walk to the back of the church to collect which one or both as needed. Personally I think I’d want to know about the fiancé being wanted BEFORE I exchanged vows...
@@user-ml3hl6vr4t Given that lawsuits flew and the changes that were made, I'm going to assume that the bride, at least in the initial case, was aware.
Victim said she caused her husband to hit her. The Judge (exasperated, horrified, this is Domestic Violence case) gave usual spiel about 'No, it's not fault of victim if they got hit by crazy jerks'. Witness countered, in plain honesty, that she actually had smack her husband with frying pan and his husband naturally response with violence.
About 15 years ago I was called for jury duty to a case where a young man had been arrested with marijuana and paraphernalia. He admitted that he was guilty but was suing the police department because they "should have been arresting bad criminals instead of him". When they asked the prospective jury members if we had any questions I asked if that was what he was suing about and they said yes. I said the guy was a total idiot and I was dismissed from jury duty.
I poisoned a whole jury pool. Woman had rented a house, with a slight rise to the front yard and ONE step in the sidewalk about halfways to the house. She had lived there for eight months, and tripped on the step. She was sitting there with a neck brace collar, and the attorneys were auditioning for 12 jurors and 12 alternates. I was #29 of the first 30 sent up. They went on and on, most that were excused stated they thought the case was stupid, and finally, had 11 seated, no alternates yet. I sat down in the 12th chair to be interviewed. I actually had a legit excuse so I had asked to be excused on my form turned into the judge. He read that statement, then looked at me and asked me if I could be objective if seated. I said no, I'd been watching her, I've worn one of those collars for 12 weeks, she didn't need the collar. I got dismissed, the attorneys looked between disgusted and wanting to strangle me and the remaining people followed me down. I got to leave. They had to start over... I doubt they got their choices done that day.
this is chubacca. he is a wookie from endore. the fact that chewbacca is mentioned in this court doesnt make sense. so if chewbacca dont make sense,,, than this case dont make sense and you must acquit. i rest my case.
My father was a lawyer on retainer for a construction company fighting a suit for not doing a job, the construction company allegedly was invoiced to do. It went to court, because the defendant, the construction company, claimed they never received any such job from the plaintiff. The lawyer for the plaintiff suggested it was submitted the invoice to discovery as evidence, but my dad couldn’t remember getting it and did something so wild, it broke Lawyering 101’s 1st rule: “Never ask a question you don’t already know the answer to.”. So, Dad demanded him to show it to the court. The look on the attorney’s face dropped as he revealed a BLANK piece of paper 😂. The suit was dropped and the counter suit, won. Biggest of Ws.
You think a house inspection and house appraisal would turn up something about five women chained in the basement. How much do you think an occupied sex dungeon impacts the cost of a house?
I don’t really regard it as a bona fide sex dungeon if there are less than eight women in it. I’d ditch the agent for one that listens more closely to my requirements.
I love that allways in end of the video I see funny/cute dog pic. :) that pic many times helps me relax if I get mad at some story. :) keep doing this bro
"From the fact that a police officer filed this report it is a reasonable inference that the crime took place as described." Well, yes, that is usually why they write those.
Funny in a sad way but Russian government claimed Khodorkovsky stole so many oil he would've needed a million trains, and somehow have these trains running for months go unnoticed.
14:10 idk, normally being fit to stand trial is about your mental capacity presently, not at the time of the crime. As for if you wish to claim insanity being the cause of the crime, now that would be about the mental state during the crime
Your honor. I would like to propose a writ of look at my head. It is big just really really big I mean he would not believe just how big this head of mine is.
The "fringe on the flag" argument sounds like it came from an episode of Law and Order (though if I recall correctly the defendants were United States citizens, just claiming that the flag meant they were in a military court and had to be declared prisoners of war. It was a weird case...)
That's the courtroom scene from King of the Hill, where eventually the judge has Dale Gribble (the one complaining about the flag) gagged, but he ends up stuffing his own cigarette in his mouth XD
Ok got one. Buddy in family court has crazy ex say this when questioned about smoking meth or crack. She goes "but I thought I was smoking different drug so it's not my fault. (can't remember which drug fit In Where In This story, but it wasn't weed for either of em lol)
9:30 even if I had heard these words loud and clear from the original source ... I would doubt my brain for misinterpreting the sound into this garbage of a statement.
I feel like these are the same people who hire a lawyer who's office looks like something straight outta Dauntless went through there... Also: Eat Tasty, Pupper
I think the m cook was thinking about his wife (and possibly kids). He knew the best possible outcome was to be grateful for what he had and just suck it up then hope to serve only half sentence via good behaviour.
I do not understand the first story, can someone please elaborate for me? Why did he look around in shock when he said the woman put her uncle down as the father?
I've seen dogs euthanized at the vet, and shot by a farmer. Shoot the dog if you love it. It never knows what happened. The dog is terrified at the vet, shaking, whimpering and they don't die instantaneously. Seriously, euthanasia should be considered more cruel than a bullet
not always true. a dog we had was losing her memories and not really knowing who anyone was. she was always docile by nature, so she wasnt difficult, but the pain she was feeling every night was sad. We held her until the moment the poison kicked in. they put her to sleep first and then used the poison.
I'm just curious why the time stamps in your video say hours ago, but all the comments are over 2 years old on reddit?? I needed to understand the first comments better, so I searched reddit for this post only to find it to be 2 years old and cherry picked already from another channel.. I really don't care about your hustle on the videos, I just want to know why you would go through the hassle of editing dates??
A guy asked the prosecutor was this law broke a state law or federal prosecutor said state. He said does that law apply 2 me specifically cuz I'm physically in the state. The prosecutor said yes the defendant set object your honor. I would like to see the evidence that the prosecutor relies upon that my physical location and only my physical location mean the laws of the state apply to me specifically. The prosecutor said it's the law. The defendants sad objection that's only an argument please present evidence. So the prosecutor thought about it and said the Constitution. He objected again saying it's only an instrument and he never signed it. How could it apply to me. Where is your evidence. The prosecutor thought about it and said I believe it was jrw law says the Constitution applies to you. The defendant said objection circular argument he's saying the law applies to me because the Constitution says it does he send the Constitution applies to me cuz the loss is it does that's only an argument there's no evidence I make a motion to dismiss this case for lack of jurisdiction. And he won. The case was dismissed for lack of personal and territorial jurisdiction. Check out Mark Stevens the no state project there's hundreds of these
"I'm not guilty because I'm innocent"
No you’re Bigfoot.
@@gerardomacias7370 omfg you dont just tell somebody they are Bigfoot!
I have a similar unbeatable defense.
Me: Isn't it true you're innocent until proven guilty?
Judge: Yes.
Me: Well since we're having a trial to prove I'm guilty I haven't been proven guilty yet. Therefore I'm innocent and there's no need for a trial.
Judge: Case dismissed
Tony Blake hmmm interesting very very interesting
@@ScreamingDucksShotMyMother Ummm you do when their account name is Just Some BIGFOOT with Internet access. Think before you speak.
My teacher once saved a couple from ruin. He represented an elderly couple who had bought a castle but were having trouble paying the rest of the mortgage due to mrs' temporarily stopping working as a tour guide (illness) and mr making less as a fellow tour guide cause he had to take care of her and had less clients due to post 2008 crash. Bank: we'll take the castle. Old man: I declare bankruptcy. Bank: you can't. My teacher: old man, do you have a business? Old man: yes. My teacher: is the castle part of the tours? Old man: yes. My teacher: do you own it? Old man: yes. My teacher: as per French law my client's small business' corporate assets and debts and my client's private assets and debts are one and the same. My client declare bankruptcy as a business. The court accepted the elderly couple's case, ruled in their favou and spread out the rest of the debt over ten more years. Castle was never seized or sold.
O.o They bought...a castle?
@@CRUSH40RULES lots of old castles get sold iirc, the government doesn't care enough to pay their upkeep as castles are expensive, so selling them to someone the forcing regulations that *they* have to pay upkeep is their better option
At least I'm pretty sure it's something like that
i dont mean to be so off topic but does anyone know a method to get back into an instagram account??
I somehow lost the login password. I appreciate any help you can offer me
@@dustinronin3262 maybe you can try calling/mailing Facebook since they own Instagram, otherwise I don't know. Look it up on google or reddit too. Good luck.
Basically: "It's not my fault I drove through his fence and into his backyard. It was the roads fault because it turned and I didn't."
I'm just, like...imagining the judge going. "Well, it wasn't technically cruel...wait...WAIIIT..."
"Am I asking for it?"
WHAT A DAMN QUEEN.
They really should put that entire story in a law and order svu episode. I would watch that episode. And chuckle at the criminals being screwed.
I was in court and an 18 year old was in front of the judge for a probation violation. His probation was violated because he didn't get a job. The judge asked, "Why didn't you get a job?" The kid looks straight at the judge with a straight face and said, "I've been fishing, your honor." The whole courtroom, including the judge, erupted into laughter. The judge gave him a second chance to complete his probation.
So part of this kid's probation was to get a job? It's so hard to land a job sometimes, especially for someone who's 18 years old. At least he didn't cause trouble and had a peaceful hobby.
@@CRUSH40RULES Right? I used to skip school to go fishin and I'm sure the judge did too. Boys will be boys lol
Last story: The guy could have just make an account with a throwaway email and added his mother as a facebook friend there then forget about it, since the final agreement never mentioned that it had to be his own account.
Or gave up Facebook.
Or did it state in the story if the account needed a certain level of activity or to stay being used afterwards.
Make account, add mom, delete account
Add mom. Unfriend mom. Simple as that.
3rd story:
Victimizing the Sex offenders and saying it's the women's fault for dressing that way or being in places like that means they are clearly asking for this makes my blood boil!
This also portrays men like any chance they get, they can't restrain themselves.
I've had the argument turned the other way around too, where women only dress that way if they want sex and don't care who it's with. I've also had a response to that:
"I'm dressed like this out of necessity, since it's damn near impossible to find something that fits and doesn't show a lot of skin, given my body's shape (I'm really short and have two melons, each a good amount larger than my head. My boobs started growing, and growing rapidly at that, when I was 6). I've been doing so since I was 8 or 9, for the same reason. Now, you tell me that that means I was asking for sex, and I'll tell you that I didn't know the first thing about sex back then. You tell me I'm asking for guys to shove their dicks into my body, and I'll tell you that I've got a girlfriend, dicks not included, no dicks required. So you can take your 'asking for it' arguments and shove them up your ass, since your attitude is what's really screaming your desire out to the world, like a billboard plastered with the words 'I want to have multiple strangers put phallic objects into several of my bodily orifices at once'. My clothing does not. My clothing says 'I'm having trouble dealing with a pair of overgrown body parts' and should not be taken to mean anything else. I'd say fuck you, but I want to stay the hell away from your twisted ideas of all topics related to sex and sexual desire"
O-ohhh damn!
Wasn't there a woman who made that claim on t.v before? Someone from the government? Can't remember the bitch's name but I think it was part of the Weinstein scandal. I'm with you on this 100% though.
There honestly should be a law that using that defense in a sexual assault case of any form is equivalent to admitting fault, and proves a distinct lack of self-control in the person, making them unfit to enter society after release.
I also think that use of this line is very stupid. It's basically saying that men have self-control of a common dog. If this had been true, the logical thing to do would have been to only allow men in public on a leash and preventively sterilise those who are seen as unfit to reproduce.
(Btw. I am not saying that this should be done in reality, because in reality, men can control themselves, obviously.)
Not a lawyer, but my grandpa told me that my dad and his second wife got into it so bad with the he-said/she-said in court, that the judge cursed, asked the officer present "is this really happening right now?", and told them both to "get the hell out of my courtroom and get a divorce".
They were in court 'cause his second wife shot him w/ his own handgun, but she claimed that he shot himself while he was cleaning it. Idk what all happened, but my grandpa just referred to the whole thing as the "Year of Hell: Part 2".
(Idk what 'Part 1' was, but apparently wife three was 'Part 3')
DemonAngelSakina I... I really like your grandpa.
@@adiposeNarnian He was an amazing man.
@Midnight Raven not for over ten years now. We had a pretty nasty falling out after my grandmother passed.
Sovereign citizen... This is always an intro to something rediculous.
The flag thing is my favorite, 'cause everyone knows that the courts derive their authority from a properly embroidered flag.
@@superdupergrover9857 Yeah, who cares about the damn flag? Plus, if the conspiracy theory is that some group has illegitimately supplanted the government and is trying to screw everyone, why would they give up so easily? They seem to think the court would just surrender, instead of painting them as crazy and full of BS.
@@KnakuanaRka I was thinking that as well. Besides, why would the judge necessarily understand the "true" nature of the government they protect?
The first thing I would do as the leader(s) of an illegitimate government is tell everyone that I and all of my actions were legitimate.
AND the word de-facto exists for a reason. If you're being robbed, just tell the robber his actions are illegal and he'll stop, right?
When researching my family history, I came across a rather amusing argument made by my ancestor when charged with bootlegging during prohibition (hired a very good lawyer in the area, one of the best who was ironically one of the most fervent drys in the community). The case against him was based on his sale of alcohol to an investigator. His defense was that he had specifically instructed the person who turned out to be an investigator that the alcohol was for medicinal uses only, but the investigator stole it anyway. Wasn't even a mistrial, he was found not guilty with that defense XD
6:15 *woman* : gives account of assaulting man with several blows to the head with an improvised weapon
*The courtroom* : hEeHeEhooOooOOHOhOoHhO
I think they were laughing because of the unexpected twist rather than the act itself.. or at least that's what I'd like to think..
@@LadyTarasque violence against men has been ridiculed for years now
"I didn't personally sign the constitution so it doesn't apply to me"
I mean, the guy has a point
He still lives in the country though, so legally it does apply to him unless he moves to a new country
But you live in the country Where its jurisdiction Is so it doesnt matter
I mean, if it was a contract he'd have a point.
I was in court testifying for a family member. The DA was mean mugging my family member the whole time. His lawyer said "Your honor, I object to that stupid look she keeps giving my client" The judge says "Objection sustained". Everyone including the jury laughed.
If it doesn't fit you MUST acquit.
9:03 Oh I love that one. "Constitution doesn't apply to me because I didn't sign it." Good point! Judge, I motion we oil up the rack!
I don't understand how these people don't realize that document is exactly the reason we can't do that and if they want to argue it doesn't apply to them.....well.....I'd say point out what it that means not to have that protection.
@@scorch2155 Exactly.
Well, at the least the meth guy kept his promise and went back to jail after getting married.
honestly that shocked me.
@@zibix4562 why would that shock you?
Honoring the agreement would work well in his favor in more ways than one.
3:03
There is no actual way that the judge allowed a felon get out for a day just to get married. People will do anything for their beliefs.
That is one great lawyer.
It's actually happened pretty often here in Indonesia.
The opposite, a wanted felon surfaces to get married-one they closed on the church after the felon groom entered and arrested him at the altar before his bride walked. To say the bride was livid was an understatement. Lawsuits flew. They now wait until after the couple walk to the back of the church to collect which one or both as needed. Personally I think I’d want to know about the fiancé being wanted BEFORE I exchanged vows...
@@user-ml3hl6vr4t
Given that lawsuits flew and the changes that were made, I'm going to assume that the bride, at least in the initial case, was aware.
A wild argument appears. It uses head butt. It's not very effective.
But look at his head! It's so huge! it would definitely leave a mark!
1:57 Wait, "cooking m"? What's so bad about cooking meat? Unless he was cooking Matt, I guess.
That's funny
To be fair, if you are tasked with defending the indefensible, you'll have to come up with some pretty ridiculous shit to even try.
"But he was on trial for murdering his parents so that didn't really fly" that sounds exactly like Aladin from Twisted.
What do you call a law student that gets a 70 in their classses?
A lawyer.
2:00 Those Cooking With Mama games got real edgy as the series went along
"implied consent for a certain amount of abuse/violence".. um, what?
Except for the case with the frying pan
Wait what
Victim said she caused her husband to hit her. The Judge (exasperated, horrified, this is Domestic Violence case) gave usual spiel about 'No, it's not fault of victim if they got hit by crazy jerks'. Witness countered, in plain honesty, that she actually had smack her husband with frying pan and his husband naturally response with violence.
About 15 years ago I was called for jury duty to a case where a young man had been arrested with marijuana and paraphernalia. He admitted that he was guilty but was suing the police department because they "should have been arresting bad criminals instead of him". When they asked the prospective jury members if we had any questions I asked if that was what he was suing about and they said yes. I said the guy was a total idiot and I was dismissed from jury duty.
I poisoned a whole jury pool. Woman had rented a house, with a slight rise to the front yard and ONE step in the sidewalk about halfways to the house. She had lived there for eight months, and tripped on the step. She was sitting there with a neck brace collar, and the attorneys were auditioning for 12 jurors and 12 alternates. I was #29 of the first 30 sent up. They went on and on, most that were excused stated they thought the case was stupid, and finally, had 11 seated, no alternates yet. I sat down in the 12th chair to be interviewed. I actually had a legit excuse so I had asked to be excused on my form turned into the judge. He read that statement, then looked at me and asked me if I could be objective if seated. I said no, I'd been watching her, I've worn one of those collars for 12 weeks, she didn't need the collar. I got dismissed, the attorneys looked between disgusted and wanting to strangle me and the remaining people followed me down. I got to leave. They had to start over... I doubt they got their choices done that day.
Makes throw away fb account
Adds mom as friend
Deletes account
11:19 ...That is fucked up on multiple levels.
Imagine getting married then hauled off to jail, that must have been some major whiplash
10:32
And this isn't even the first time I've heard of this sort of thing.
this is chubacca. he is a wookie from endore. the fact that chewbacca is mentioned in this court doesnt make sense. so if chewbacca dont make sense,,, than this case dont make sense and you must acquit. i rest my case.
Where is the wheelie bin case? It would fit so well here.
My father was a lawyer on retainer for a construction company fighting a suit for not doing a job, the construction company allegedly was invoiced to do. It went to court, because the defendant, the construction company, claimed they never received any such job from the plaintiff. The lawyer for the plaintiff suggested it was submitted the invoice to discovery as evidence, but my dad couldn’t remember getting it and did something so wild, it broke Lawyering 101’s 1st rule: “Never ask a question you don’t already know the answer to.”. So, Dad demanded him to show it to the court. The look on the attorney’s face dropped as he revealed a BLANK piece of paper 😂. The suit was dropped and the counter suit, won. Biggest of Ws.
13:20 oh so he admitted the case was in bad faith
Clock Blocked 🤣
You think a house inspection and house appraisal would turn up something about five women chained in the basement. How much do you think an occupied sex dungeon impacts the cost of a house?
Pretty big, I think. But that's also very dependent of your taste.
I don’t really regard it as a bona fide sex dungeon if there are less than eight women in it. I’d ditch the agent for one that listens more closely to my requirements.
@@eddiebruv Then what would 5 women in a basement classify as? A harem?
I love that allways in end of the video I see funny/cute dog pic. :) that pic many times helps me relax if I get mad at some story. :) keep doing this bro
"From the fact that a police officer filed this report it is a reasonable inference that the crime took place as described."
Well, yes, that is usually why they write those.
And of course police officers never lie or write false reports.
Funny in a sad way but Russian government claimed Khodorkovsky stole so many oil he would've needed a million trains, and somehow have these trains running for months go unnoticed.
14:10 idk, normally being fit to stand trial is about your mental capacity presently, not at the time of the crime. As for if you wish to claim insanity being the cause of the crime, now that would be about the mental state during the crime
I like court/lawyer vids
Jr Gaming i like turtles
8:14 happened in a king of the hill episode with Dale.
Your honor. I would like to propose a writ of look at my head. It is big just really really big I mean he would not believe just how big this head of mine is.
9:19 roast on, son. Damn.
"Eat Tasty, Pupper"
1:33 Imagine if every guy would have started undressing at that moment
The "fringe on the flag" argument sounds like it came from an episode of Law and Order (though if I recall correctly the defendants were United States citizens, just claiming that the flag meant they were in a military court and had to be declared prisoners of war. It was a weird case...)
That's the courtroom scene from King of the Hill, where eventually the judge has Dale Gribble (the one complaining about the flag) gagged, but he ends up stuffing his own cigarette in his mouth XD
If that Danish case was in Italy, it might have worked.
Ok got one. Buddy in family court has crazy ex say this when questioned about smoking meth or crack. She goes "but I thought I was smoking different drug so it's not my fault. (can't remember which drug fit In Where In This story, but it wasn't weed for either of em lol)
9:30 even if I had heard these words loud and clear from the original source ... I would doubt my brain for misinterpreting the sound into this garbage of a statement.
The honeymoon had to postpone.
Eat Tasty, Pupper. i'm buying an extra-large pizza for dinner, tomorrow. i can almost smell the hot greasy pepperoni.
Eat tasty pupper!
...
Oh no! I forgot the comma!!!
Yummy pupper
WARNING: NOPE OUT NOW, because near the end, there is a tragic, sick, awful, story that does not belong in a compilation of amusing arguments.
Why would you try and frick a horse?? Do you want to get kicked? That’s how you get kicked!
I feel like these are the same people who hire a lawyer who's office looks like something straight outta Dauntless went through there...
Also: Eat Tasty, Pupper
0:33 I'm not sure I get it.
John Fenton Allen vs. State of Georgia
All you can do is laugh.
Eat tasty, pupper
Eat Tasty, Pupper
I think the m cook was thinking about his wife (and possibly kids). He knew the best possible outcome was to be grateful for what he had and just suck it up then hope to serve only half sentence via good behaviour.
I do not understand the first story, can someone please elaborate for me? Why did he look around in shock when he said the woman put her uncle down as the father?
That is called an incestuous relationship
I’m sorry, there was 69 comments. Forgive me for I have sinned
can someone explain the first one? im dumb
“Eat Tasty, Pupper”
I've seen dogs euthanized at the vet, and shot by a farmer. Shoot the dog if you love it. It never knows what happened. The dog is terrified at the vet, shaking, whimpering and they don't die instantaneously. Seriously, euthanasia should be considered more cruel than a bullet
not always true. a dog we had was losing her memories and not really knowing who anyone was. she was always docile by nature, so she wasnt difficult, but the pain she was feeling every night was sad. We held her until the moment the poison kicked in. they put her to sleep first and then used the poison.
What was that last one
1:44 Why did they censor "Miso"?
I'm just curious why the time stamps in your video say hours ago, but all the comments are over 2 years old on reddit?? I needed to understand the first comments better, so I searched reddit for this post only to find it to be 2 years old and cherry picked already from another channel.. I really don't care about your hustle on the videos, I just want to know why you would go through the hassle of editing dates??
Mr Oooo Weee I'm confused - the comments look to me to all have recent time stamps as well.
Wait what?!?!?
A guy asked the prosecutor was this law broke a state law or federal prosecutor said state. He said does that law apply 2 me specifically cuz I'm physically in the state. The prosecutor said yes the defendant set object your honor. I would like to see the evidence that the prosecutor relies upon that my physical location and only my physical location mean the laws of the state apply to me specifically. The prosecutor said it's the law. The defendants sad objection that's only an argument please present evidence. So the prosecutor thought about it and said the Constitution. He objected again saying it's only an instrument and he never signed it. How could it apply to me. Where is your evidence. The prosecutor thought about it and said I believe it was jrw law says the Constitution applies to you. The defendant said objection circular argument he's saying the law applies to me because the Constitution says it does he send the Constitution applies to me cuz the loss is it does that's only an argument there's no evidence I make a motion to dismiss this case for lack of jurisdiction. And he won. The case was dismissed for lack of personal and territorial jurisdiction. Check out Mark Stevens the no state project there's hundreds of these
Eat Tasty, Pupper
Also, I feel guilty, your Honor.
Eat Tasty, Pupper!
“Not a lawyer” “defenCe”
Clearly
defence just happens to be the English English way of spelling the American English 'defense'.
Eat tasty, Pupper!
Title is a little misleading
Eat Tasty, Pupper.
eat tasty, pupper UwU
All right, you caught me. Eat tasty, pupper :p
Can I sue reddit channels for threatening to lay a curse on me if I don't like/comment/subscribe?
10:56 i wouldnt mind being a man in this situation if the roles were reversed, especially if the woman is as violent as possible
Are you okay?
Brievel Montague yes
Eat tasty, Pupper
EAT TASTY PUPPER
🌲 FIRST 🎄
Incorrect
@@TheFalseSavior okay
First
Eat Tasty, Pupper
Eat Tasty, Pupper
Eat Tasty, Pupper
Eat Tasty, Pupper
Eat Tasty, Pupper