How to Equip an Ancient Chinese Armor in 10 Steps

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 141

  • @camrendavis6650
    @camrendavis6650 4 ปีที่แล้ว +98

    You have no idea how long I've been wanting to see a video like this on Chinese armor. Sooooooo cool

    • @lankatemplearmory3336
      @lankatemplearmory3336  4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Thank you, mate!

    • @camrendavis6650
      @camrendavis6650 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@lankatemplearmory3336 do you have anything on Ming Dynasty Armor? That's my favorite kind. But I want to know how you put it on.

    • @lankatemplearmory3336
      @lankatemplearmory3336  4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@camrendavis6650 We have Ming Dynasty Armoor recreated, and will think about making a vedio of it.

    • @ericnino6048
      @ericnino6048 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      LankaTemple Armory how much would something like this cost?

    • @mufasha
      @mufasha 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ericnino6048 around 3-5 thoundsand usd

  • @TheError202
    @TheError202 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    you know there are many videos about European armor, Roman armor... Chain mail and stuff.. but this is my first Video i see from Chinese Armor, Thank you for sharing.
    Learning without thinking is vain; thinking without learning is dangerous.

  • @RedmarKerkhof
    @RedmarKerkhof 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I am building a Chinese armour and this is a very very helpful video. Thanks a lot!

  • @aoifa_silverDragon
    @aoifa_silverDragon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you. that was very informative. :D i really wanted to see how all the pieces fitted together!

  • @gorgosaurus4548
    @gorgosaurus4548 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I really want to get this armor its so amazing!!

  • @phoenixrising4573
    @phoenixrising4573 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Friend of mine in the SCA has been helping a group from China with their kits. I'm really digging the look, I might start working on one along side my 15th century European harness!

  • @MrX-zc4pv
    @MrX-zc4pv 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    this is so epic

  • @趙明-n6n
    @趙明-n6n 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    在戴頭鍪之前 頭部先要有軟帽或是布巾結紮罩頂 防止頭部碰撞頭鍪 布巾結紮的方式 可以參考相關書籍 例如古兵器考

    • @xinyiquan666
      @xinyiquan666 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      板门弄斧,你知道这些·人是谁吗?

    • @趙明-n6n
      @趙明-n6n 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@xinyiquan666 是班門弄斧 非板也!多讀些書吧!😜😜😜

    • @taocry
      @taocry 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@xinyiquan666 在头盔内保护头发和额头皮肤是很常见的问题,隋唐时期的幞头最初就是头盔下头巾演变。

    • @DezRoey
      @DezRoey 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      确实,你说的没错

  • @smilecat2501
    @smilecat2501 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    看起來是唐宋後的型制,我記得有本解說盔甲的書有提到腰上圍那塊布/皮革是宋代後比較普遍

  • @aa1944-k2r
    @aa1944-k2r 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    very interesting, i think i personally like the ming/qing dynasty armor the most

  • @warlord5295
    @warlord5295 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I really like the helmet especially the aventail I plan on putting a norse helm together and I wanted to find something that can protect your neck better than chainmail. I think I'll have the lamellar aventail but put on the front front to make it easier to breath all while still being heavily protected.

    • @yohopirate
      @yohopirate 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      historical depictions seem to cover the front, including early ones upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0d/Officer_of_the_Guard_of_Honour._Tomb_of_Princess_Changle_%28%E9%95%BF%E4%B9%90%E5%85%AC%E4%B8%BB%E5%A2%93%29%2C_Zhao_Mausoleum%2C_Shaanxi_province._Tang_Zhenguan_year_17%2C_ie_644_CE.jpg

  • @pplla7821
    @pplla7821 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This so cool!! 👍

  • @chioccolat1957
    @chioccolat1957 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    thats some monster hunter stuff right there lol, good stuff

  • @codeagent47
    @codeagent47 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow, I want one please!!

  • @theshriekinghominin1760
    @theshriekinghominin1760 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    More videos pleeease.

  • @RandomUser_online
    @RandomUser_online 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    we finally got to see the mountain pattern lamellar

  • @johnhayes6414
    @johnhayes6414 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where can i buy or make Chinese armor and garb clothing

  • @steretsjaaj2368
    @steretsjaaj2368 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love lamellar armours

  • @vich635
    @vich635 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    很漂亮!不过护胫和护脚在哪儿?两肋侧翼明显缺乏防护啊。另外很多挂件,挂钩好像是那种松紧挂钩吧?古代的时候有这种挂钩吗?

    • @vich635
      @vich635 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @B J 不是指腰带扣,是指那些松紧挂钩

    • @cosmos69
      @cosmos69 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vich635 现在方便穿戴用挂钩,以前都是绳子。

    • @haoosc5017
      @haoosc5017 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      早就有了,隋唐时代就有腰带口了,我见过博物馆实物

  • @edwardwonghaupepelutivrusk6666
    @edwardwonghaupepelutivrusk6666 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I enjoyed this video. What is total weight of the armor by kilogram?

  • @scarface6417
    @scarface6417 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    你是把哪个小姑娘的豹纹内衣拆了做的吗

  • @starsea3313
    @starsea3313 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Would you post a link to your website? I'd like to find out about buying armor from you.

  • @lankatemplearmory3336
    @lankatemplearmory3336  4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Welcome to our facebook page: facebook.com/lankatemple.armory

  • @chickknightgreenleaf820
    @chickknightgreenleaf820 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    wait? are those snap hook you use to attach the amour pieces to the chest plate? are they historical authentic or a modern add-on

    • @oblivion5390
      @oblivion5390 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      they probably used to tie it before

    • @henyz1210
      @henyz1210 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      In ancient times, ropes such as cow tendon ropes were used to tie, which is a simplified modern version

  • @landongsi
    @landongsi 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So the waist is actually not covered by armour, between the chest and the thighs.

  • @Justin-ug3ii
    @Justin-ug3ii ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very nice video but calling it "ancient Chinese armour" is too generalised. Considering the various imperial dynasties throughout China's history all had distinctively different types and styles of armour. This set of armour looks to be of the Song dynasty 10th century - 14th century

    • @ingdjr5573
      @ingdjr5573 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sure

  • @brandthull5471
    @brandthull5471 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    How are the chest and back sections shaped and rigid like that? It seems like they have some heft to them, like they have a metal plate backing to them or something.

    • @taocry
      @taocry 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The shape is not history accurate. This team is trying to mock Plate armour. They should mention it. How to make it accurate? We still need wait for archaeological finds from some tomb。

    • @samuraijackoff5354
      @samuraijackoff5354 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@taocry
      We don't really have any surviving artifacts so far. We only have diagrams and paintings of them existing.

    • @jintsuubest9331
      @jintsuubest9331 ปีที่แล้ว

      The structure comes from the geometry of the small individual pieces and the linkage method.
      Depends on various adjustment, they can be as fluid as scale armor to as rigid as plate.
      There are lots of artworks depicting such armor, there is at least 1 instance of diagram of those individual plate.
      However there is no archeological evidence of such armor exist.
      Logically I do not think such armor exist, as the most advance armor employed even by the emperor is brigandine of some sort with comparatively small plate.

  • @investlikeawarrior
    @investlikeawarrior ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder how more more moblity you get in Chinese Armor v.s. Western plate. Or if they can close. Either way Fei Chango Hao! Xie Xie for the demonstration

    • @samuraijackoff5354
      @samuraijackoff5354 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      They have about the same mobility personally, but lamellar chinese armor have the advantage of better heat control and ability to draw the bow and wider arm movements.

  • @dwiarif4363
    @dwiarif4363 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well done, now you became dong zhao, go conquer han dynasty 🔥🔥

    • @EricChien95
      @EricChien95 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      First its Dong Zhuo, secondly its Song Dynasty armor which is a few dynasties away from the Han. Heck its after Tang.

  • @ScottGrow117
    @ScottGrow117 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yo, if y’all can speak english, do you study chinese sword fighting? And do you do full contact sparring?

  • @ericnino6048
    @ericnino6048 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    How historically accurate is this?

    • @haoosc5017
      @haoosc5017 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      50%

    • @ericnino6048
      @ericnino6048 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      中华小超哥 how do? Which parts are not?

    • @haoosc5017
      @haoosc5017 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@ericnino6048 This hauberk,we call it mountain nail,because it looks like chinese word 山 ,it means mountain 。 It found in china ancient draw ,but there is no antique ,we cant make it sure 。So ,in china armor fans world ,we didn‘t accept this style 。It’s maybe right ,just maybe 。

    • @haoosc5017
      @haoosc5017 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ericnino6048 th-cam.com/video/2u-OqH41MXc/w-d-xo.html

    • @Chigou
      @Chigou 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      More like 30%. the actual pieces seems right. But the way they are attached are mostly wrong. At the very least, the spring hooks were not used at the period. Also the beast heads were used to over the gap between the shoulder and the upper arm, which was not done here. There are still bits and pieces wrong. But overall, a good attempt at historical restoration.

  • @MrAmerilias
    @MrAmerilias 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What about padding under armor?

    • @pandalaicko
      @pandalaicko 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      leather and cotton fasten by leather leads

  • @halfshaman8455
    @halfshaman8455 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where. Can I buy a set of armor like this? What should I expe t price wise?

    • @mufasha
      @mufasha 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      you can order from him around 3000-5000uds+shipping.

    • @haoosc5017
      @haoosc5017 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      8000RMB,1500 USD

  • @johnthiam2446
    @johnthiam2446 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This is genuine chinese armour not those we seen on tv.. Those fantasy design make me wanna puke.

    • @taejo4975
      @taejo4975 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep those are very overexaggerated and too fantasy

    • @Wvk5zc
      @Wvk5zc ปีที่แล้ว

      IKR

  • @裴军
    @裴军 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    我对盔甲没有什么研究,但是感觉好像这些盔甲一般都是将军之类的才会穿,因为这些盔甲制作工艺复杂,不能大批量生产。好像在哪看过,士兵主要还是穿皮甲或者藤甲之类的,基础防护型的盔甲。不是很了解,不知道是不是真的。

    • @haoosc5017
      @haoosc5017 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      没经过训练的人,穿着重甲十分钟没力气了。普通小兵两片胸甲一个头盔 齐活。多了也带不动

    • @海滨的螃蟹
      @海滨的螃蟹 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      兄弟,宋朝的时候就已经成建制的装备“步人甲”了。还有同时代最出名的“铁浮屠”,这些盔甲本质都一样,都是装备成建制的部队。

    • @快乐的人-j8s
      @快乐的人-j8s 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      步人甲

  • @ColossalSwordFormAndTechnique
    @ColossalSwordFormAndTechnique 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Saw this armor in ghost of tsushima lol

    • @papercat2599
      @papercat2599 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      ghost of Tsushima only has han and mongol mixed armor。This is pure Han chinese armor

    • @Jake-dh9qk
      @Jake-dh9qk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@papercat2599 The Mongols very likely adopted some Song dynasty armor designs when they conquered China.

    • @papercat2599
      @papercat2599 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Jake-dh9qk ghost of Tsushima is before they beat Song Dynasty.

    • @Jake-dh9qk
      @Jake-dh9qk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@papercat2599 song dynasty collapse to mongols before they started invading japan

    • @papercat2599
      @papercat2599 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Jake-dh9qk you are wrong the first invasion start when song dynasty still alive. The second invasion was after the song collapse

  • @majungasaurusaaaa
    @majungasaurusaaaa 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This one has big gaps on the sides.

    • @YapsiePresents
      @YapsiePresents 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's so chinese to cover that up with decorations

  • @dreamiet
    @dreamiet 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Lol it looks heavy. I think a women would pass out after a mile walk lol.

    • @absyahwa7698
      @absyahwa7698 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      This kind of armor is only used by cavalry division, its too heavy for regular infantry

    • @lolfang5725
      @lolfang5725 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Not really. European knights also have women. Chinese armor is lighter than knight armor after the 13th century

    • @skatetrooper5285
      @skatetrooper5285 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@lolfang5725 it depends on the armor but not really...
      The thing is European armor weight was better distribute around the body better most of it concentrated in the core part of the human body so actually feels lighter even if it is heavier. This is why knights as well as men-at-arms can fight on Horseback or on foot with no problem.
      Even so plate armor was over all lighter then most other types of armor with the same coverage because they did a better job in utilizing the mass of the steel for the coverage as it was heavily shaped to the Human body.

    • @perrytran9504
      @perrytran9504 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@skatetrooper5285 This. The mobility difference weight distribution makes is huge - just compare early samurai armor (a bit more comparable to this) with late samurai armor (much more similar to European plate) and it's night and day. Though to be fair that's several centuries worth of advancement so better performance is to be expected.

    • @skatetrooper5285
      @skatetrooper5285 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@perrytran9504 I agree. Japanese had some good armor designs as well.

  • @gorgosaurus4548
    @gorgosaurus4548 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    sorry but is that real metal or rubber that looks like metal, and again sorry

    • @lolfang5725
      @lolfang5725 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The gold is metal, the black part is leather

    • @Phoenixrising2055
      @Phoenixrising2055 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      More like iron that was cover in brass

    • @xinyiquan666
      @xinyiquan666 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Phoenixrising2055 its rustless steel

  • @lukasarch
    @lukasarch 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    doesn't seems strong, in real battle each pieces can easily fall apart.

    • @josephstalin4202
      @josephstalin4202 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It is meant to fall apart. Just like modern cars when you take an impact, the pieces absorb shocks separately. Engineering man

    • @Wvk5zc
      @Wvk5zc ปีที่แล้ว +3

      it based on real armor used in real battle. So you dont know what you're talking about

    • @samuraijackoff5354
      @samuraijackoff5354 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's really the point. If one part is damaged, then it can be easily and cheaply fixed unlike big pieces of armor. Even then it can give very good protection.