I don’t ever really comment on videos but I had to after watching this. As someone in this business, I’ve seen a ton of videos on recording/mixing. Especially when I was starting out. If this was the first video that every newcomer saw, the world of production would be in a much better place. It took me years to get to the mindset that you’re speaking of. For instance, I still have a few pieces of hardware for tracking but I used to have a lot more for 2 reasons, one of which you touched on. 1) I was proud of the fact that I got to a point where I could own these things and 2) I felt that clients walking in and seeing my desk loaded with gear would be impressed and ignore my shortcomings as a producer. If more people spent time actually mixing instead of looking for the magic plugin/hardware to make their mixes sound better they’d be miles ahead. I could go on and on about how many of the points you made are 100% true but I’d be here all day. It’s great to see someone on here not talking nonsense, selling people on stuff they don’t need and making things even more confusing for those starting out. I can only hope that instead of being stubborn like I was, they listen, take this all in and save themselves a ton of time and money. Much respect.
I really appreciate your comment. It took me forever for me to get to that understanding as well. The world of audio is over complicated with brands and names. Everything is a tool and getting in the mindset of using the right tool for the job instead trying to use brands and names definitely took some time but it made me better over all in more fields than one.
Brand is never a bad thing...you can buy a pair of Jordan's...or play basketball in a pair of Payless look alike Jordan's and have your big toe poking out in a week lol.
The microphone doesn't matter as long as it sounds good. Period. - Michael Jackson used an SM57 ($99) on Thriller as well as the SM57a and SM57b on other recordings, Stevie Wonder used a Electro-voice RE20 ($450) on Superstition, Billy Eilish uses an Audio Technica AT2020 ($99), Adel used a Rhode Classic ($1,000). The list goes on & on. - Basically; Sing into the mic. If you like how it sounds - use it! I can't tell you how many times we've set up a bunch of high priced mics in the studio, only to find that the one that sounded best on the singer's voice was an inexpensive mic they'd brought with them (1. Because they knew how to work the mic & 2. Because they'd stumbled on a mic that brought out something special in their voice..character). The basic rule is:--- "It's better to have an amazing performance on a crappy mic than a crappy performance on an amazing mic".
Yeah, I think she does; that was my first “professional” microphone. That was about 11 years ago; if I had focused on my mixing, I could've made a lot of songs off of it.
I think mentors are necessary, because it takes a lot of time and money to mature and then funny enough you end up kind of going a bit backwards because you realize how you left things on the table.
TBH, I’m getting weary of the “Emulation” arguments myself. Either gears sounds good or it doesn’t. I absolutely love Warm Audio stuff because after having had the “Expensive” stuff, I get amazing results with their stuff as well as other gear. It’s marketing Strategy I get that too. Cool vid.
The worse thing for your ears is a screen :) it’s ok if you end up choosing an SM57 for the vocal sound rather the U47. I once got the most amazing sound for a dulcimer only to discover it was an omni mic in the corner of the studio facing the wall that I was actually listening too. I left it there and that was the recording. I really had to fight the urge to use a closer mic but in the end just continued like that because it sounded so great. Gefell MV691 with Omni capsule through an old Siemens 672 mic pre. Best sound I’ve ever gotten.
"Say *'microphone'* again. Say *'microphone'* again, I dare you, I double dare you m0therfvck3r, say *microphone* one more G0ddamn time!" -Samuel L Jackson
Sir, I am only 7 minutes in and this is the smartest Sphere L22 review I have seen. I am a person 2 and you said just what I was thinking and wondering about.
This is basically a plugin. There is nothing wrong with plugins, I personally think the plugins are not necessarily a replacement for the analog great, but an addition because plugins can do much, much more than analog gear, so in short plugins are magnificent. But plugins cannot do everything, and this microphone thing is one of those things.
Ha! Loved this take on why the Sphere L22 is a great mic. So true that if you haven't used the mics it's modelling- it doesn't matter 'cause you have no frame of reference so best to just get down to business finding what works for you. Got mine a couple weeks ago and am loving it so far! Paired with my Apollo X4, the possibilities are all I need.
Well said. Very honest. I was mislead by the title of the video. I thought you were going to bash the Sphere L 22, when in fact you biguped it. Thank you for presenting this perspective.
Jason Goldberg who engineers NBA YoungBoy uses this mic with an Apollo twin and says he couldn’t tell the difference between the L22 and a c800g. Between both of you I’m sold 🤣
This is ridiculously good. Wish I'd have seen something like this when I was first getting into VO. This advice and exeperience applies to all case uses when finding your microphone or microphones.
So is most likely whatever you typed this on. Design has nothing to do with where it's manufacturered. If it where designed in Germany but made in someone's bedroom to spec I don't think it matters.
@@nextstar55 nothing as long as you don’t throw shade at people who can’t That said, if I made sacrifices to have $$$$ gear and heard people say that something that costs $$ sounds just as good, I’d be feeling a way
I agree with you 100%, but I really enjoy my gear and I work hybrid because it’s fun but at the end of the day I could get my sound with my UAD plugins and the L22. I still choose to collect and use my analog gear because I enjoy it, so in a way it’s more of a choice of how you want to work these days. You can use analog gear or you can do it all in the box. Both ways are perfectly valid and can get you to the same place. Vintage gear and way overpaying for hardware because it’s old is where I draw the line, it’s just too cost prohibitive to buy vintage gear these days. 10k for a pultec for example is just nuts......Great video and good luck with your studio, wish you the best!!!
A bit late to the party, but I absolutely love this video. From the message of "it's the sound, not the label or price." of microphones, the one take stream of conscienceless type presentation, to even dropping the microphone. I feel like you are channeling how I would actually be when I am trying to explain to someone. I relate to this video as a presenter and also walked away with some good perspective and knowledge. Thank you for this. You are awesome, keep up the amazing work!
I’m glad you got some good information from this I’m hoping to do another review being that I’ve had it for 5 years now. Oh yeah lol I dropped my vape mod and not the microphone (thankfully)
I believe there is a fourth reason "person" for this mic. Sometimes a mic can create a nuance for creativity, experimentation and even creating a "vintage sound". Not worth spending so much (or renting) for an effect. This mic would be great to have those sounds.
Dude your fairly lit in this video is what I’m getting a little during watching this. But your right and you should be proud of yourself your real as f***. Lol I’m getting me one of these 😊 Peace
To me, the UAD Sphere DLX is a decent microphone, because it is easy to set up and handle and best thing I've had so far to record my guitars at home in stereo (I've had Neumann TLM 102 and KM 184 pairs before the Sphere). The next question is what you consider expansive. To me it's a question of preference and priority. My guitars with the related gear are what I would consider expensive, where I invest into. When recording isn't your priority, the Sphere DLX with the Solo and the mic plugins are incredibly versatile tools. Having said that, if I want or need a professional recording, I book a recording engeneer. No matter how expensive my recording gear would be, I will never become as good at recording, as a professional. Thank you for your review.
The "realest" review I've seen in a long time. Thanks for that man. I've used all of those vintage pieces u mentioned in high dollar studios and I have said the same things u said, "it doesn't matter". I've heard amazing tracks on amateur gear and amateur tracks on amazing gear. All that matters is if it sounds good to YOU. I just heard the Townsend mic yesterday in a friend's studio and I loved it. It's gonna be my next purchase. Your review sealed the deal. That and the fact that Townsend Labs took the time to listen and respond. That to me is awesome. I am now a Townsend Labs convert! Thanks again bruh!
At first I was checking in to see what somebody possibly could find wrong with this mic and say something nasty... but instead I heard a excellent review of an incredible mic!.. Well done
He's right for the most part. This mic is perfect for those who plan to record other artist and not just themselves. Microphones are not a one size fits all. For instance the AT4050 may sound great for one it may sound terrible on another. Im speaking from experience and its a nightmare to use a microphone that doesn't sound good on a certain vocal. No matter how eq & compression thats applied, it simply doesn't work. The L22 is perfect for this scenario because it models several different mic models. This almost ensures you'll found the perfect mic for any artist. In fact Townshend Labs just released a new update with added mics to the list. If you own a UAD Apollo interface it makes it even better because you'll be able to record though the Unison Mic pres which models several vintage analog channel strips such as SSL, Neve, & Manely. So if you plan to record different artist or even instruments the L22 is a great investment.
This was the most honest and truthful video I've ever seen on the subject. I'm in the market for a new vocal microphone, and my head is spinning from all the choices. Thank you!
I just get what’s works for my situation. Sometimes if I’m away from my studio I might just use a sub mic. I got rid of a lot of high end equipment simply because it was no longer relevant to my recording situation.
Nice review. I think it’s important to add, this mic and the software does things that other mics can’t do. It goes way beyond eq. To be able to change the polar pattern/proximity effect/width after the recording had taken place can be a real lifesaver. If someone is hiring talent to come in and do a track by the hour, your time is better spent getting the material down other than juggling between different mics. This mic is so versatile, there’s no reason you can’t get a sound that will be usable in the mix. I look forward to buying another. Thank you.
That’s definitely one of the great things about this mic because the emulations aren’t eq at all. I can’t remember entirely how exactly they explained it but it’s the front and rear capsule information for each microphone. So when you adjust for brighter or darker tone. It’s the push and pull of the front and rear capsule, very unique approach.
I use a shure sm7b and it's perfect for me. I don't need anything else. At the end of the day what matters more than the mic is what you do with it. You can have a million dollar mic, but if you making terrible music with it then it's irrelevant.
Wow, I needed this. I'm young with like 5 or 6 years of experience. I'd say I'm the number two person. I have no idea what a real LA-2A sounds like but I know the UAD one that I use gets me exactly what I need. I'm interested in this and I already use UAD/Slate (was actually looking into the ML - 1 to see if its any good cuz it's going for 500$ rn) and it's like, why try and stress about getting a sound that is eventually going to be manipulated into something where you might not even hear it. Appreciate the honest reminder. I'm 22 and the experience on the originals would be dope to have, but if the music sounds good, nothing else matters.
Same here man preach, I’ve only been doing this for going on a year and it’s really fascinating to have the real gear where the uad stuff does it well enough, and I only have one microphone and spent money on of things and don’t plan on upgrading unless it’s some 1k mic since I strictly believes the man behind it and performing is what’s gonna matter most. Only thing I am serious about also because I want an actual piece of gear (my first) is the Avalon v5 preamp which am a big fan of its sound and know it’ll be 100% worth it than the plug-in
I wholeheartedly agree. When I was looking at buying this microphone, I was also looking at Neve preamps and channel strips, but then I realized.. why? I have an Apollo 8, I can load any of their preamp emulators and like you said, the Unison preamps are fantastic. I am selling my WA-412 preamps for this reason too. Going lean, with a Scarlett Octopre ADAT to expand my Apollo 8 to 16 inputs. Amazing setup and it doesn't break the bank!
Mannn you was talking directly to me iam new to recording but I know all about the gear I never used lol i was goin to spend about 5k on mic 🎤 & channel strip
Surprisingly insightful review, especially given the title. 😉 I might not agree on the "future proof" aspect of it though considering that it's software driven. Townsend Labs is a young single product company and who knows for how long they will be around. Will the software work for you 20, 30, 40 years from now? A regular mic you will be able to just plug in anywhere at anytime and it will do the job. That's much more future proof. But even if it only lasts for 10 years it might be worth the investment if you like the mic. I just would not count on being able to use it throughout the whole career (depending on how old you are).
It still stands out as a great microphone without the software. Also they native software it they also have the UAD plugin. I doubt UAD is going anywhere.
@@CGPENT Sir, fantastic video & you sold me on this mic in this video. If it only last 10 years, it will at least give me no excuses for those years as I’ll now have all the mics and pre’s, compressors/EQ’s to experiment/work with and bonus, I’ll know which mics and chains will work best for me and the sounds I’m trying to achieve. You rock!
@@davidhornbeckmusic7487 I'm glad you decided to buy in. I'm not sure if you know but UAD has aquired the company. So I believe this system will definitely be around for quite some time. I've used as standalone as well and came back to the studio and applied emulations. It's an awesome system and hope UAD continues to improve and add the collection.
That is SO COOL that Townsend Labs responded to this brother that only has 400 subs but great content. i was on the fence between Slate and Townsend, but I'm SOLD because of this video... and I'm SOLD that Townsend replied to him!! LOVE THIS. Going to Zzounds to order this! Hey C.G. what city are you in?
@CGPENT, LLC I watched the first video before I got my townsend mic. I just saw the video and watched it and was like wait a min I seen this a few months ago. Wasn't trying to put u on blast
Lol nah it's all good. I actually get that. Well, it'll be a while before I pick up the new one I feel like by then it wouldn't makes sense to do the video, but also I'd just be repeating myself. I am interested in the smaller version UA created. I would love to try it to understand why lol
I'm sure it's happened with both the sphere hasn't given me any problems from it tho. The u87 just seemed more sensitive to things like that than expected
I agree with everything you said and agree the vast majority of expensive gear isn’t required. However two additional points…. Good analog gear rarely depreciates, especially if you buy used(beware of fakes). It’s somewhat important to make the artist feel special because they are singing into the same expensive mic that made that hit album on. That doesn’t mean you can’t make a hit album on a handful of cheap gear :)
I can see your point but I guess it's more for people who are inexperienced with maintain ing analog gear. I have a bricasti that requires hardly any maintenance at all and has appreciated by $1000 since I bought it. If I do purchase analog I try buy gear that holds value.
I'm at minute 7 and can't watch more....as I'm 'category 2' I'm feeling annoyed because the whole point is the opportunity to audition all these microphones by using the L22...in that respect its an awesome tool. Its nothing to do with hype it's to do with the opportunity to use this to find the sound you want - you can audition these other mics once you have already recorded your vocal take - that's amazing! then as you say 'it's subjective' you can then work out what sounds good for your vocal.
Bro that’s the actual point I’m making. This is an amazing microphone that gives you the opportunity to audition an entire mic locker. “The Hype” is hook a for the video that somehow worked out. My point for category 1&2 is this microphone is most likely all you need.
I have always been a big fan of the preamp ... a decent mic on a great pre ... will sound waaaaay better than a killer mic on a cheap low quality pre .... play back monitors and room environment have a significant importance as well ... and at the end of the day it's all in your ears and your skill ... your ears are free, in fact you already have two them ... my 2¢
Best Mic Ever!!!!! but People can do with any mic just create !! I think this mic sounds amazing !!! IDC if it's identical or not it's still an amazing mic !!!
Great reality check. I have a modelling mic, and am struggling with it because I "expect" a certain similarity, where as, I should work with what it does and create an fx chain that works to bring out it's best.
Man preach the true The mic don't matter if got a horrible pre amp or great Chain and a horrible singer unison pre Amps are that deal my Avalon 737 sounds like my analog gear
Honestly, I feel like this should be everyone's first microphone. By all means, buy whatever microphone you want after, but I think this microphone gives a good idea of the different tones of different microphones.
Ok yes thanks. Honestly I can’t hear much of a difference using the Apollo in your other video, seems like I would say it isn’t necessary. Especially once everything is in the mix, I doubt anyone would be able to tell the difference
Great! I have been recording for many years and I also try to stay away from too much gear and learn how to use the stuff I already own. However, I can imagine this microphone to be a wonderful learning tool for those who want to dive into production, just as guitar plugins as Amplitube and the likes offer an easy access to a lot of different gear making it easy and affordable to learn the key differences and features. After watching this, I decided to stay away from this microphone and put some more work into the gear I already won. Thanks for saving me money!
you forgot one type of person: somebody who has a bunch of mics but doesn't have time to figure out which of those mics are going to work well on a particular source (usually vocal). I like to get my artists in a day early to figure out what mic in my locker is their mic. in cases where I can't, the Townsend is a great way to just record and figure it out later. it might also clue me in on which mics I should pull out of my locker for a test on their next session. I also encourage you to get all the mics profiles you can afford via UAD because they are great. and imho way better than the ones that ship with the mic.
I've been messing around with home recording for a few years now and couldn't agree with you more. I just recently identified a vocal sound I like and it took a lot of trial and error to get there. Thanks for the video.
Damn, this hit. I've been in the field for probably 15-16 years (just getting into film as well) and even after so much experience. This simple advice grounded me. The biggest takeaway, "This and UAD plugins will make it to where you don't have to think about your gear and you can focus on creating music". Definitely needed to hear that and as a huge fan of UAD plugin emulations, I'm happy to hear there's a microphone technology that can be just as convenient and useful. Hearing this advance couldn't be better timing. As I was starting to get shaky on whether I should record my latest project with U67 Reissue or U87. Now I can do both, either or neither... and still make the damn song. Thanks man!
I will be starting back at some point. I’ve just been restructuring my business so when I finally start making videos again it’ll be a higher production value and better content.
Just stumbled on this... Liked and Sub'd thanks. Even this mic is out of my price range, when you're looking at all the things to spend money on plugins, hardware, guitars, keys, sequencers but it will probably be my next mic purchase. I appreciate this feedback and advice. I'm running a PreSonus Studio 192 which I think should be close to UAD in preamps, maybe not quite...so I think I could sit with that and add the L22 and see the quality result hopefully..... :-)
Well said! You make a hellava point. I had the Slate and didn't like it. You can't even get this mic right now so those that have it keep it. I'm waiting for it to be available again so I can pull the trigger. One thing I don't understand is if it's a stereo mic how does it receive two signals? Are you using two mic cords with it? Oh ok, it comes with a breakout cable.
Appreciate this! I think bottom line for me is, I don't have thousands and thousands of dollars to spend on different microphones to try on my voice to find the ones that work well, so a quality microphone that allows for flexibility of tone with emulation could be a good place to start, even if the emulations aren't perfect. I have both a Rode NT1A and a Warm Audio 87 going into an SSL2+ interface, and I'm just not crazy about the NT1A or WA87 on my voice. I consistently hear way too much 1000-1500 Hz, whether it's my voice or the mics or both, I don't know, but I am just really curious if other microphone models would help with smoothing that area out, even if they're emulated. TL;DR I'm interested in this mic because I'm still searching for a mic that likes me and I can't afford all the real ones to try my voice on. Anyone else?!
This is a good place to start. I had some frequency issues with an actual U87; funny, those same issues are present for me even in the emulations. I tend to like the 251 in general but especially for singers.
@@CGPENT Haha damn, really? Well, I'll think about it some more, but I'm still liking the idea of having options on the fly. Thanks for your reply, and the 251 suggestion ;)
How would you compare a Focusrite ISA one vs the UAD Unison pres? Do you think it maybe better using the analog pre like the ISA one or like a Bae 1073? I'm currently using a Tlm 103.
You have to decide what analog really means to you. I was a person that in the beginning only wanted analog but it didn’t fit with my mobile needs now I’m all digital and it allows me to be more flexible. UAD is going to give you a lot of flexibility. If you’ve never worked with an analog sound it might be best not to get your ears set on that sound. There is plenty to love about analog but its just more responsibility and less flexibility. The 103 was my first microphone as well and I think having the flexibility is going to help you a lot. Having the Townsend and UAD combined is pretty special you can record the way you do at home on the road.
Welcome to the matrix 🤣😂. I just renamed the video since UAD bought Townsend Labs. It's the same microphone essentially just different colors. Information is the same tho
Fantastic video. I am thinking of buying this mic, I love to hear your personal opinion on my story so I can make the best decision. I am an professional opera singer and do my recordings at home. I have a apollo x4 and most of the UAD pre amp emulations and other good plug ins for vocals and mixing. I bought the Charteroak SA538 I think 20 years ago, it is that old, however, I didn't use it on a daily basis. The challenges I run into using this mic is that my voice sounds diminished, like it is locked up in a box and the power of the voice and also the clarity is not there - it sound completely different from what my real voice is. That means if I want to bring power in and clarity I have to do tons of processing to get the sound a little better, it is kinda frustrating for a 1700 euro mic. I made a vocal booth using professional materials hoping the sound would improve by getting rid of my living room over-acoustic frequencies. No difference on the power of the voice. There the vocal booth is closed with the professional blankets I get even more muddy sound. I recorded close by 3 inches, and 6 inches, 12 inches to see if it is because the mic cannot handle the operatic sound - the farther I stand away the thinner the sound becomes....I have no idea if it is the type mic I bought, or, that 20 years made it warn out although it always diminished my vocals. The DLX, do you think in your opinion and experience with the mic that it would be the solution for me and finally get my voice recorded as it is, or, do you think that the mic without any processing and even without the UAD different mic options, that it would capture my voice a lot better than what I described about the charteroak studio microphone! Mostly opera singers are recorded with 2 mics to get that wider kinda stereo field sound as you hear on classical albums, or Pavarotti's recordings. The DLX plug in does have a stereo option to record with and I wonder if that would mimic the way opera singers are recorded. What do you think? You can hear the vocals sound FREE and not boxed in and weak - I think you know what I mean...I think they probably not do a whole lot of wild processing on opera voices beside maybe some compression and reverb if it is not recorded in a hall - Hope you can shine some light into my recording world 🙂and looking forward for a positive reply hopefully that the DLX will make a big difference for my recordings...Thanks in advance...
I do believe this microphone will work amazingly for you. A vocal booth in a home studio isn’t necessary and often times does sound boxy because you’re putting your voice in a literal box especially for opera. Your voice needs to breathe and have actual space to develop. Treat the room you’re recording in. The only reason to have vocal booth is for isolation.
Thank you so much for your fast reply and advice. I really appreciate it. You brought a smile on my face, there is hope for me still to make good recordings 🙂 Thanks again..- @@CGPENT
![ผัวเถื่อน - ยูริ โตเกียวมิวสิค [ OFFICIAL MUSIC VIDEO ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/P08ORRVDGl8/mqdefault.jpg)
I don’t ever really comment on videos but I had to after watching this. As someone in this business, I’ve seen a ton of videos on recording/mixing. Especially when I was starting out. If this was the first video that every newcomer saw, the world of production would be in a much better place. It took me years to get to the mindset that you’re speaking of. For instance, I still have a few pieces of hardware for tracking but I used to have a lot more for 2 reasons, one of which you touched on. 1) I was proud of the fact that I got to a point where I could own these things and 2) I felt that clients walking in and seeing my desk loaded with gear would be impressed and ignore my shortcomings as a producer. If more people spent time actually mixing instead of looking for the magic plugin/hardware to make their mixes sound better they’d be miles ahead. I could go on and on about how many of the points you made are 100% true but I’d be here all day. It’s great to see someone on here not talking nonsense, selling people on stuff they don’t need and making things even more confusing for those starting out. I can only hope that instead of being stubborn like I was, they listen, take this all in and save themselves a ton of time and money. Much respect.
I really appreciate your comment. It took me forever for me to get to that understanding as well. The world of audio is over complicated with brands and names. Everything is a tool and getting in the mindset of using the right tool for the job instead trying to use brands and names definitely took some time but it made me better over all in more fields than one.
Brand is never a bad thing...you can buy a pair of Jordan's...or play basketball in a pair of Payless look alike Jordan's and have your big toe poking out in a week lol.
Use your ears not your gear…This comment was beautiful
Great comment!
This is one hell of a review. You sold me on it. Townsend Labs needs to see this.
George Gatewood III Thank you so much. I’m sure they have. Hope they see this comment.
@@CGPENT yup, we've seen it. Thanks George and C.G.!
@@Townsendlabs serious company does it research and pay attention to its customers! Love to y'all, waiting for more vintage mic on my L22
@@roes369 Thanks! We agree with you on that. Glad to see happy customers.
@@ctown000 yes sir!
The microphone doesn't matter as long as it sounds good. Period. - Michael Jackson used an SM57 ($99) on Thriller as well as the SM57a and SM57b on other recordings, Stevie Wonder used a Electro-voice RE20 ($450) on Superstition, Billy Eilish uses an Audio Technica AT2020 ($99), Adel used a Rhode Classic ($1,000). The list goes on & on. - Basically; Sing into the mic. If you like how it sounds - use it!
I can't tell you how many times we've set up a bunch of high priced mics in the studio, only to find that the one that sounded best on the singer's voice was an inexpensive mic they'd brought with them (1. Because they knew how to work the mic & 2. Because they'd stumbled on a mic that brought out something special in their voice..character).
The basic rule is:--- "It's better to have an amazing performance on a crappy mic than a crappy performance on an amazing mic".
Agreed. It took me years learn this
Billie uses a Telefunken Elam 251
Yeah, I think she does; that was my first “professional” microphone. That was about 11 years ago; if I had focused on my mixing, I could've made a lot of songs off of it.
@@CGPENT Same here. LOL. It seems to be an unteachable lesson though.
I think mentors are necessary, because it takes a lot of time and money to mature and then funny enough you end up kind of going a bit backwards because you realize how you left things on the table.
TBH, I’m getting weary of the “Emulation” arguments myself. Either gears sounds good or it doesn’t. I absolutely love Warm Audio stuff because after having had the “Expensive” stuff, I get amazing results with their stuff as well as other gear. It’s marketing Strategy I get that too. Cool vid.
christlovemins yeah definitely marketing
The worse thing for your ears is a screen :) it’s ok if you end up choosing an SM57 for the vocal sound rather the U47. I once got the most amazing sound for a dulcimer only to discover it was an omni mic in the corner of the studio facing the wall that I was actually listening too. I left it there and that was the recording. I really had to fight the urge to use a closer mic but in the end just continued like that because it sounded so great. Gefell MV691 with Omni capsule through an old Siemens 672 mic pre. Best sound I’ve ever gotten.
"Say *'microphone'* again. Say *'microphone'* again, I dare you, I double dare you m0therfvck3r, say *microphone* one more G0ddamn time!"
-Samuel L Jackson
😂🤣😂 I’ve gotta post this to my FB. This is too good just made my day. #microphone 🎙😎
I think your comment was flagged for profanity you might wanna symbolize it up to make it visible
@@CGPENT I made it 1337 .. lol
Sir, I am only 7 minutes in and this is the smartest Sphere L22 review I have seen. I am a person 2 and you said just what I was thinking and wondering about.
I’m glad I could help. This is an amazing microphone and it’s the most versatile one I’ve ever used. It has a sound I can trust to be consistent.
Also......it's always the person in front of the microphone that is the most important factor
🌬🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
This is basically a plugin. There is nothing wrong with plugins, I personally think the plugins are not necessarily a replacement for the analog great, but an addition because plugins can do much, much more than analog gear, so in short plugins are magnificent.
But plugins cannot do everything, and this microphone thing is one of those things.
To summarise: its an amazing system with endless benefits no matter who you are.
Exactly
Ha! Loved this take on why the Sphere L22 is a great mic. So true that if you haven't used the mics it's modelling- it doesn't matter 'cause you have no frame of reference so best to just get down to business finding what works for you. Got mine a couple weeks ago and am loving it so far! Paired with my Apollo X4, the possibilities are all I need.
Well said. Very honest. I was mislead by the title of the video. I thought you were going to bash the Sphere L 22, when in fact you biguped it. Thank you for presenting this perspective.
It definitely a great mic phone. Been using it since it hit the market.
Jason Goldberg who engineers NBA YoungBoy uses this mic with an Apollo twin and says he couldn’t tell the difference between the L22 and a c800g. Between both of you I’m sold 🤣
This is ridiculously good. Wish I'd have seen something like this when I was first getting into VO. This advice and exeperience applies to all case uses when finding your microphone or microphones.
Thank you
FYI, the Sphere microphone is made in China. So you're paying $300 for the microphone and $1200 for the plug-in. No problem, as long as you're aware.
So is most likely whatever you typed this on. Design has nothing to do with where it's manufacturered. If it where designed in Germany but made in someone's bedroom to spec I don't think it matters.
The dislikes are from the dudes that spent 100k in hardware haha.
Lol just like I said it hurts feelings
what's wrong with spending a 100k on equipment if you can afford it?
@@nextstar55 nothing.
@@nextstar55 nothing as long as you don’t throw shade at people who can’t
That said, if I made sacrifices to have $$$$ gear and heard people say that something that costs $$ sounds just as good, I’d be feeling a way
@@aheartthrob but who's throwing shade at people who don't have 100k of equipment???
thanks for this video! good stuff but what you said in 29 mins could have been said in 10 mins .......
I agree with you 100%, but I really enjoy my gear and I work hybrid because it’s fun but at the end of the day I could get my sound with my UAD plugins and the L22. I still choose to collect and use my analog gear because I enjoy it, so in a way it’s more of a choice of how you want to work these days. You can use analog gear or you can do it all in the box. Both ways are perfectly valid and can get you to the same place. Vintage gear and way overpaying for hardware because it’s old is where I draw the line, it’s just too cost prohibitive to buy vintage gear these days. 10k for a pultec for example is just nuts......Great video and good luck with your studio, wish you the best!!!
A bit late to the party, but I absolutely love this video. From the message of "it's the sound, not the label or price." of microphones, the one take stream of conscienceless type presentation, to even dropping the microphone. I feel like you are channeling how I would actually be when I am trying to explain to someone. I relate to this video as a presenter and also walked away with some good perspective and knowledge. Thank you for this. You are awesome, keep up the amazing work!
I’m glad you got some good information from this I’m hoping to do another review being that I’ve had it for 5 years now. Oh yeah lol I dropped my vape mod and not the microphone (thankfully)
All i got to say is, it doesn't matter :)))
🤣 and these are the facts
I believe there is a fourth reason "person" for this mic. Sometimes a mic can create a nuance for creativity, experimentation and even creating a "vintage sound". Not worth spending so much (or renting) for an effect. This mic would be great to have those sounds.
You got rgat right brother
After moved to UAD sold bunch of hardware
And find myself browsing Sweetwater
And just nah dont need any more gear .
Dude your fairly lit in this video is what I’m getting a little during watching this. But your right and you should be proud of yourself your real as f***.
Lol I’m getting me one of these 😊
Peace
Nah probably tired or just waking up 🤷🏾♂️🤣
I already own an L22, and this was really a good listen and made perfect sense. Thanks for sharing...
You should title the review. "I don't care about your gear, I am going to find my sound!" :-)
Alain Julot 😂🤣😂
Great video!
This mic is shockingly good on acoustic guitars when using the mic as a stereo mic. Well done.
"what matters is a microphone that fits your voice"
me who wants to record drums: 👁️👄👁️
Drums have a voice too
Have the dlx he’s right 😉
To me, the UAD Sphere DLX is a decent microphone, because it is easy to set up and handle and best thing I've had so far to record my guitars at home in stereo (I've had Neumann TLM 102 and KM 184 pairs before the Sphere). The next question is what you consider expansive. To me it's a question of preference and priority. My guitars with the related gear are what I would consider expensive, where I invest into. When recording isn't your priority, the Sphere DLX with the Solo and the mic plugins are incredibly versatile tools. Having said that, if I want or need a professional recording, I book a recording engeneer. No matter how expensive my recording gear would be, I will never become as good at recording, as a professional. Thank you for your review.
The "realest" review I've seen in a long time. Thanks for that man. I've used all of those vintage pieces u mentioned in high dollar studios and I have said the same things u said, "it doesn't matter". I've heard amazing tracks on amateur gear and amateur tracks on amazing gear. All that matters is if it sounds good to YOU. I just heard the Townsend mic yesterday in a friend's studio and I loved it. It's gonna be my next purchase. Your review sealed the deal. That and the fact that Townsend Labs took the time to listen and respond. That to me is awesome. I am now a Townsend Labs convert! Thanks again bruh!
I can’t own another microphone after the Townsend Labs L22 it has me spoiled.
I was secptic at first. But I like this Video. I have the Townsend and its worked absolute WONDERS
At first I was checking in to see what somebody possibly could find wrong with this mic and say something nasty... but instead I heard a excellent review of an incredible mic!.. Well done
John Porter thank you
He's right for the most part. This mic is perfect for those who plan to record other artist and not just themselves. Microphones are not a one size fits all. For instance the AT4050 may sound great for one it may sound terrible on another. Im speaking from experience and its a nightmare to use a microphone that doesn't sound good on a certain vocal. No matter how eq & compression thats applied, it simply doesn't work. The L22 is perfect for this scenario because it models several different mic models. This almost ensures you'll found the perfect mic for any artist. In fact Townshend Labs just released a new update with added mics to the list. If you own a UAD Apollo interface it makes it even better because you'll be able to record though the Unison Mic pres which models several vintage analog channel strips such as SSL, Neve, & Manely. So if you plan to record different artist or even instruments the L22 is a great investment.
Would this match up well with a SSL2+?
@@jrockofages5413
Yes…
@@RodneyD thank you. Thank you. Torn between this and Lauten Audio Atlantis
I wanna smoke what you smoke
This was the most honest and truthful video I've ever seen on the subject. I'm in the market for a new vocal microphone, and my head is spinning from all the choices. Thank you!
Thank you for such an insightful review. Very down to earth and easy for any one (regardless of skill level) to understand.
Thank you
FYI: Your gear kit link leads nowhere ! Can you let me know when it’s working again? Thanks
D
“This mic is $1500.....”
*something falls and rolls on the floor*
Me: 😬😳
It was my vape mod🤣😂🤣
@@CGPENT 🤣 Whew!
Great video btw.
I saw bricasti verb and hilo lynx behind you haha. But you are down to earth and very realistic.
I just get what’s works for my situation. Sometimes if I’m away from my studio I might just use a sub mic. I got rid of a lot of high end equipment simply because it was no longer relevant to my recording situation.
Man, I've been searching for a long time for the normal non-marketing opinion of this microphone. Thanks!
Nice review. I think it’s important to add, this mic and the software does things that other mics can’t do. It goes way beyond eq. To be able to change the polar pattern/proximity effect/width after the recording had taken place can be a real lifesaver. If someone is hiring talent to come in and do a track by the hour, your time is better spent getting the material down other than juggling between different mics. This mic is so versatile, there’s no reason you can’t get a sound that will be usable in the mix. I look forward to buying another. Thank you.
That’s definitely one of the great things about this mic because the emulations aren’t eq at all. I can’t remember entirely how exactly they explained it but it’s the front and rear capsule information for each microphone. So when you adjust for brighter or darker tone. It’s the push and pull of the front and rear capsule, very unique approach.
Respect. The realest! Thank you, so much!🙂🙏🏿
I use a shure sm7b and it's perfect for me. I don't need anything else.
At the end of the day what matters more than the mic is what you do with it. You can have a million dollar mic, but if you making terrible music with it then it's irrelevant.
Thats essentially what he was saying at the 5 minute mark.
how do you record a mono channel using the DLX ? It's very difficult to pan guitars that are recorded in stereo!!!
You pan both channels to the middle
Dope review bro it’s next on my list to pair with my x6 do you have a ig?
Yeah my IG is @cgp_ent
Hell yea bro, I’m getting one to pair with my x8p
Wow, I needed this. I'm young with like 5 or 6 years of experience. I'd say I'm the number two person. I have no idea what a real LA-2A sounds like but I know the UAD one that I use gets me exactly what I need. I'm interested in this and I already use UAD/Slate (was actually looking into the ML - 1 to see if its any good cuz it's going for 500$ rn) and it's like, why try and stress about getting a sound that is eventually going to be manipulated into something where you might not even hear it. Appreciate the honest reminder. I'm 22 and the experience on the originals would be dope to have, but if the music sounds good, nothing else matters.
Same here man preach, I’ve only been doing this for going on a year and it’s really fascinating to have the real gear where the uad stuff does it well enough, and I only have one microphone and spent money on of things and don’t plan on upgrading unless it’s some 1k mic since I strictly believes the man behind it and performing is what’s gonna matter most. Only thing I am serious about also because I want an actual piece of gear (my first) is the Avalon v5 preamp which am a big fan of its sound and know it’ll be 100% worth it than the plug-in
+ Subscribe. Love this insight. Thank you from group 1.
I wholeheartedly agree. When I was looking at buying this microphone, I was also looking at Neve preamps and channel strips, but then I realized.. why? I have an Apollo 8, I can load any of their preamp emulators and like you said, the Unison preamps are fantastic. I am selling my WA-412 preamps for this reason too. Going lean, with a Scarlett Octopre ADAT to expand my Apollo 8 to 16 inputs. Amazing setup and it doesn't break the bank!
I’m still running a skeleton setup with no complaints
The summation of this video ....'Believe the hype'.... The mic is extra dope
🤣😂🤣 spot on.
It does work the best with UAD. We just picked up the Putnam and Ocean Way mic lockers.... In recording heaven right now. lol
AudibleHeaT nice man. I’m glad it’s working out for you.
@@audibleheatmusicgroup3454 you don't feel its redundant? I only have the TL UAD plug in and I think it's well enough
There is redundancy. There are some pretty cool mics in both add-ons. I'm guessing there just tweaks.
Wow what a great video! Absolute truth with regards to choosing a mic that fits a specific voice REGARDLESS of price or hype. Beauty!
Mannn you was talking directly to me iam new to recording but I know all about the gear I never used lol i was goin to spend about 5k on mic 🎤 & channel strip
I was the same way 😂
The fact alone that this mic gives options makes it a worthy consideration in itself. I’m saving up for one.
They are truly amazing update video coming soon
Surprisingly insightful review, especially given the title. 😉
I might not agree on the "future proof" aspect of it though considering that it's software driven. Townsend Labs is a young single product company and who knows for how long they will be around. Will the software work for you 20, 30, 40 years from now?
A regular mic you will be able to just plug in anywhere at anytime and it will do the job. That's much more future proof.
But even if it only lasts for 10 years it might be worth the investment if you like the mic. I just would not count on being able to use it throughout the whole career (depending on how old you are).
It still stands out as a great microphone without the software. Also they native software it they also have the UAD plugin. I doubt UAD is going anywhere.
@@CGPENT Sir, fantastic video & you sold me on this mic in this video.
If it only last 10 years, it will at least give me no excuses for those years as I’ll now have all the mics and pre’s, compressors/EQ’s to experiment/work with and bonus, I’ll know which mics and chains will work best for me and the sounds I’m trying to achieve.
You rock!
@@davidhornbeckmusic7487 I'm glad you decided to buy in. I'm not sure if you know but UAD has aquired the company. So I believe this system will definitely be around for quite some time. I've used as standalone as well and came back to the studio and applied emulations. It's an awesome system and hope UAD continues to improve and add the collection.
thank you bro for this amazing video. I still don't know if I need it or not, but I enjoyed this video so much ❤
That is SO COOL that Townsend Labs responded to this brother that only has 400 subs but great content. i was on the fence between Slate and Townsend, but I'm SOLD because of this video... and I'm SOLD that Townsend replied to him!! LOVE THIS. Going to Zzounds to order this! Hey C.G. what city are you in?
Tucson, AZ
Thank you for this video. Subbed because your the only person I've seen talking about this and being real. Respect man
Thank You🙌🏾
Beo did u just change the name of the video to make it like its about the new mic.
There's no audio from the L22 in this video so the message still applies. The microphone was just rebranded. So buying either is a good idea.
@CGPENT, LLC I watched the first video before I got my townsend mic. I just saw the video and watched it and was like wait a min I seen this a few months ago. Wasn't trying to put u on blast
Lol nah it's all good. I actually get that. Well, it'll be a while before I pick up the new one I feel like by then it wouldn't makes sense to do the video, but also I'd just be repeating myself. I am interested in the smaller version UA created. I would love to try it to understand why lol
Cool video. Thanks and greetz ✌🏼
so your clients spit into your U87 but not the sphere? or you’re saying this mic is more durable?
I'm sure it's happened with both the sphere hasn't given me any problems from it tho. The u87 just seemed more sensitive to things like that than expected
I agree with everything you said and agree the vast majority of expensive gear isn’t required. However two additional points…. Good analog gear rarely depreciates, especially if you buy used(beware of fakes). It’s somewhat important to make the artist feel special because they are singing into the same expensive mic that made that hit album on. That doesn’t mean you can’t make a hit album on a handful of cheap gear :)
I can see your point but I guess it's more for people who are inexperienced with maintain ing analog gear. I have a bricasti that requires hardly any maintenance at all and has appreciated by $1000 since I bought it. If I do purchase analog I try buy gear that holds value.
I'm at minute 7 and can't watch more....as I'm 'category 2' I'm feeling annoyed because the whole point is the opportunity to audition all these microphones by using the L22...in that respect its an awesome tool. Its nothing to do with hype it's to do with the opportunity to use this to find the sound you want - you can audition these other mics once you have already recorded your vocal take - that's amazing! then as you say 'it's subjective' you can then work out what sounds good for your vocal.
Bro that’s the actual point I’m making. This is an amazing microphone that gives you the opportunity to audition an entire mic locker. “The Hype” is hook a for the video that somehow worked out. My point for category 1&2 is this microphone is most likely all you need.
I have always been a big fan of the preamp ... a decent mic on a great pre ... will sound waaaaay better than a killer mic on a cheap low quality pre .... play back monitors and room environment have a significant importance as well ... and at the end of the day it's all in your ears and your skill ... your ears are free, in fact you already have two them ... my 2¢
@@suite6creative Feel like the environment is the pinnacle of a great sound. Your ears hear what they hear in any environment
@@CGPENT truth ...
Honestly Black man really know how to explain things so well when it comes to music Fo real
This is the realist interview i have might have ever seen on youtube.
I appreciate it man.
Best Mic Ever!!!!! but People can do with any mic just create !! I think this mic sounds amazing !!! IDC if it's identical or not it's still an amazing mic !!!
You are totally correct...
I should mention that I do use an Apollo and only consider the Sphere L22 because of it.
In my personal opinion that’s the best match for this microphone.
dude just saw this video, now this a real advice💯💯💯
Great reality check. I have a modelling mic, and am struggling with it because I "expect" a certain similarity, where as, I should work with what it does and create an fx chain that works to bring out it's best.
Exactly
What a freaking hilarious video. Helpful too.
Great take, I appreciate this perspective.
Man preach the true The mic don't matter if got a horrible pre amp or great Chain and a horrible singer unison pre Amps are that deal my Avalon 737 sounds like my analog gear
Yeah I got rid of my millennia preamps because of UA 😂🤣😂
This mic future proofs you. I couldn’t agree more. This mic plus an Apollo twin is a winning combination
Solid video, and I usually don’t sit through a half hour of a guy talking. Really thinking about this mic
Honestly, I feel like this should be everyone's first microphone. By all means, buy whatever microphone you want after, but I think this microphone gives a good idea of the different tones of different microphones.
Best review of any product ever 😂😂🤣
No Bullshit
Thank you 🤣
You are right ! Thank you ! Good Luck !
Would you say the preamps on a focusrite USB 6 would work with the DLX?
@@navinamusic as long as you have 2 inputs it will work.
Ok yes thanks. Honestly I can’t hear much of a difference using the Apollo in your other video, seems like I would say it isn’t necessary. Especially once everything is in the mix, I doubt anyone would be able to tell the difference
@navinamusic I feel that’s true for most cases I tend to focus more the environment but the better the environment the more you hear.
Thank you for your time and your help. Great video.
no problem. hopefully i can get time next year to do more videos.
Oh my fucken god ....this has to be the best video I’ve seen in 2020
Thanks 🙌🏾
Great! I have been recording for many years and I also try to stay away from too much gear and learn how to use the stuff I already own. However, I can imagine this microphone to be a wonderful learning tool for those who want to dive into production, just as guitar plugins as Amplitube and the likes offer an easy access to a lot of different gear making it easy and affordable to learn the key differences and features. After watching this, I decided to stay away from this microphone and put some more work into the gear I already won. Thanks for saving me money!
you forgot one type of person: somebody who has a bunch of mics but doesn't have time to figure out which of those mics are going to work well on a particular source (usually vocal). I like to get my artists in a day early to figure out what mic in my locker is their mic. in cases where I can't, the Townsend is a great way to just record and figure it out later. it might also clue me in on which mics I should pull out of my locker for a test on their next session. I also encourage you to get all the mics profiles you can afford via UAD because they are great. and imho way better than the ones that ship with the mic.
Facts. I do believe I've purchased the uad mics as well
Dope video!🙌🏼 Bro any idea why the 3 sphere uad mic collections are not listed in PT uad drop down list?? I only see them in uad console 🤦♂️
That's weird try searching for it or reload your plugins.
I've been messing around with home recording for a few years now and couldn't agree with you more. I just recently identified a vocal sound I like and it took a lot of trial and error to get there. Thanks for the video.
Damn, this hit. I've been in the field for probably 15-16 years (just getting into film as well) and even after so much experience. This simple advice grounded me. The biggest takeaway, "This and UAD plugins will make it to where you don't have to think about your gear and you can focus on creating music". Definitely needed to hear that and as a huge fan of UAD plugin emulations, I'm happy to hear there's a microphone technology that can be just as convenient and useful.
Hearing this advance couldn't be better timing. As I was starting to get shaky on whether I should record my latest project with U67 Reissue or U87. Now I can do both, either or neither... and still make the damn song. Thanks man!
No problem man. We get lost in the hype sometimes that setup will simplify your life tremendously.
Why did you stop making videos this is a great video and I subscribed. Bless up.
I will be starting back at some point. I’ve just been restructuring my business so when I finally start making videos again it’ll be a higher production value and better content.
This is super helpful thank you !
Just stumbled on this... Liked and Sub'd thanks. Even this mic is out of my price range, when you're looking at all the things to spend money on plugins, hardware, guitars, keys, sequencers but it will probably be my next mic purchase. I appreciate this feedback and advice. I'm running a PreSonus Studio 192 which I think should be close to UAD in preamps, maybe not quite...so I think I could sit with that and add the L22 and see the quality result hopefully..... :-)
Well said! You make a hellava point. I had the Slate and didn't like it. You can't even get this mic right now so those that have it keep it. I'm waiting for it to be available again so I can pull the trigger. One thing I don't understand is if it's a stereo mic how does it receive two signals? Are you using two mic cords with it? Oh ok, it comes with a breakout cable.
Jason Pittman it comes with the dual cable so you’ll need two inputs for it. I actually had a longer custom cable made for it.
Best Review I have seen on this mic and your pov applies to many things music. A+++
Thank you! Needed to hear this!
Appreciate this! I think bottom line for me is, I don't have thousands and thousands of dollars to spend on different microphones to try on my voice to find the ones that work well, so a quality microphone that allows for flexibility of tone with emulation could be a good place to start, even if the emulations aren't perfect. I have both a Rode NT1A and a Warm Audio 87 going into an SSL2+ interface, and I'm just not crazy about the NT1A or WA87 on my voice. I consistently hear way too much 1000-1500 Hz, whether it's my voice or the mics or both, I don't know, but I am just really curious if other microphone models would help with smoothing that area out, even if they're emulated.
TL;DR I'm interested in this mic because I'm still searching for a mic that likes me and I can't afford all the real ones to try my voice on. Anyone else?!
This is a good place to start. I had some frequency issues with an actual U87; funny, those same issues are present for me even in the emulations. I tend to like the 251 in general but especially for singers.
@@CGPENT Haha damn, really? Well, I'll think about it some more, but I'm still liking the idea of having options on the fly. Thanks for your reply, and the 251 suggestion ;)
4 years old and 2023 in the tile? hmmmm nah
It's a rebranded microphone. The information still applies.
How would you compare a Focusrite ISA one vs the UAD Unison pres? Do you think it maybe better using the analog pre like the ISA one or like a Bae 1073? I'm currently using a Tlm 103.
You have to decide what analog really means to you. I was a person that in the beginning only wanted analog but it didn’t fit with my mobile needs now I’m all digital and it allows me to be more flexible. UAD is going to give you a lot of flexibility. If you’ve never worked with an analog sound it might be best not to get your ears set on that sound. There is plenty to love about analog but its just more responsibility and less flexibility. The 103 was my first microphone as well and I think having the flexibility is going to help you a lot. Having the Townsend and UAD combined is pretty special you can record the way you do at home on the road.
excellent.
I’m confused as shit, how is this and so many comments from years old?
Welcome to the matrix 🤣😂. I just renamed the video since UAD bought Townsend Labs. It's the same microphone essentially just different colors. Information is the same tho
Fantastic video. I am thinking of buying this mic, I love to hear your personal opinion on my story so I can make the best decision. I am an professional opera singer and do my recordings at home. I have a apollo x4 and most of the UAD pre amp emulations and other good plug ins for vocals and mixing. I bought the Charteroak SA538 I think 20 years ago, it is that old, however, I didn't use it on a daily basis. The challenges I run into using this mic is that my voice sounds diminished, like it is locked up in a box and the power of the voice and also the clarity is not there - it sound completely different from what my real voice is. That means if I want to bring power in and clarity I have to do tons of processing to get the sound a little better, it is kinda frustrating for a 1700 euro mic. I made a vocal booth using professional materials hoping the sound would improve by getting rid of my living room over-acoustic frequencies. No difference on the power of the voice. There the vocal booth is closed with the professional blankets I get even more muddy sound. I recorded close by 3 inches, and 6 inches, 12 inches to see if it is because the mic cannot handle the operatic sound - the farther I stand away the thinner the sound becomes....I have no idea if it is the type mic I bought, or, that 20 years made it warn out although it always diminished my vocals. The DLX, do you think in your opinion and experience with the mic that it would be the solution for me and finally get my voice recorded as it is, or, do you think that the mic without any processing and even without the UAD different mic options, that it would capture my voice a lot better than what I described about the charteroak studio microphone! Mostly opera singers are recorded with 2 mics to get that wider kinda stereo field sound as you hear on classical albums, or Pavarotti's recordings. The DLX plug in does have a stereo option to record with and I wonder if that would mimic the way opera singers are recorded. What do you think? You can hear the vocals sound FREE and not boxed in and weak - I think you know what I mean...I think they probably not do a whole lot of wild processing on opera voices beside maybe some compression and reverb if it is not recorded in a hall - Hope you can shine some light into my recording world 🙂and looking forward for a positive reply hopefully that the DLX will make a big difference for my recordings...Thanks in advance...
I do believe this microphone will work amazingly for you. A vocal booth in a home studio isn’t necessary and often times does sound boxy because you’re putting your voice in a literal box especially for opera. Your voice needs to breathe and have actual space to develop. Treat the room you’re recording in. The only reason to have vocal booth is for isolation.
Thank you so much for your fast reply and advice. I really appreciate it. You brought a smile on my face, there is hope for me still to make good recordings 🙂 Thanks again..- @@CGPENT
@joshrainbow-IceTenor no problem
The fact you call it the ‘Spear DLX’ makes me skeptical of this review.
4 mins in and I realise I was wrong to be skeptical 😂 great vid and exactly what I was looking for, thank you!
Thanks man check out my recent videos where I compare the Sphere DLX, LX and the Townsend Labs L22
DoP3