JET ENGINE FUNDAMENTALS

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 352

  • @k_a_bizzle
    @k_a_bizzle ปีที่แล้ว +22

    So glad this guy went on to narrate every movie trailer in the 90s. What a legendary career.

  • @hopefullylost4012
    @hopefullylost4012 4 ปีที่แล้ว +276

    One of the most valuable jewel found in the internet. The best learning experience about jet engines. The old school presentation was a truly top gun teaching in the subject matter. Thanks so much for sharing.

    • @johns.1898
      @johns.1898 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Is it? There's plenty of mistakes in this

    • @DumbledoreMcCracken
      @DumbledoreMcCracken 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This is the dumbest explanation ever.
      It creates the illusion of understanding in the viewer, without any real understanding

    • @betabilly
      @betabilly 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      3rd graders in the 1950's could comprehend this, Today, any kid over 9 years old would lose interest very quickly. Wake up schools! Your 21st century public school academics, radical agendas coupled with your liberal mindset driven by a total lack of moral purpose in education will end the high level of civilization we always strove to achieve.

    • @jubuttib
      @jubuttib ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@johns.1898 Such as?

    • @johns.1898
      @johns.1898 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jubuttib I'm not gonna re-watch it to answer you

  • @tiagomascarenhas2357
    @tiagomascarenhas2357 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    The best explanation ever of a phisycs topic. Good old XX century style, when content mattered more than superficial entertainment.

  • @michaelbauers8800
    @michaelbauers8800 ปีที่แล้ว +129

    Love these old educational videos. This is very clear on the basics of jet engines. Wish I had found it years ago.

    • @TheLuminousOne
      @TheLuminousOne ปีที่แล้ว +3

      they are the best

    • @jeanounou
      @jeanounou ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Never too late brother. Long as you still breathing, it ain't ♥✌✌

    • @jukkatakamaa7274
      @jukkatakamaa7274 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jeanounou ...reminds me of this: th-cam.com/video/nY5WjIvyEXo/w-d-xo.html

  • @lindsay5985
    @lindsay5985 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Finally, a competent and comprehensive explanation! It's sad so many of the modern videos on the workings of jet engines, with their CG animations (some with the blades actually spinning the wrong way), are actually so superficial in commentary and content, they fall so short when compared to this video - one that must have been made ~40 years ago, but with actual in-depth knowledge of the topic. What a difference it makes.

  • @ELCADAROSA
    @ELCADAROSA 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I attended the USN Gas Turbine Systems school back in 1984.
    While this video wasn't one that was used (as I remember, anyway) it brings back memories of the training and experience I had.
    DD, DDG & FFG ships had GE LM2500 main engines.
    DD, DDG & CG-47 ships had the Allison 501 K-17 engines for Ships Service Gas Turbine Generators (SSGTG).
    R-R-B-R-R-B-R

  • @BoleDaPole
    @BoleDaPole ปีที่แล้ว +148

    Kinda lied in my application to Boeing saying I'm a jet engine specialist, first day on the job is tomorrow and this video is really teaching me something. Wish me luck 🙏

    • @alext8828
      @alext8828 ปีที่แล้ว

      How'd you do??? Hey, tomorrow's Sunday, you liar.

    • @njez7563
      @njez7563 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@mmm365 bro was joking 💀

    • @Milkmans_Son
      @Milkmans_Son ปีที่แล้ว

      You'll be fine since Boeing doesn't make engines.

    • @brucebanner52
      @brucebanner52 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just remember bro: Like a gun, Like a hose and Like a balloon. You'll be climbing the ladder in no time 🙏

    • @datopperharlee2628
      @datopperharlee2628 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Good luck

  • @longfade
    @longfade 2 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    Fantastic! This has the same quality of the old Jam Handy instructional films from the 30’s-50’s. Prelinger archives has tons of stuff like this; absolutely fascinating explanations of commonplace things mostly taken for granted.

    • @alext8828
      @alext8828 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes. Those were great.

    • @amitpatil5151
      @amitpatil5151 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Good

  • @bubblehead78
    @bubblehead78 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    A superb lecture, not just the best on jet engines, but one of the best lectures on any subject.

    • @vatodad
      @vatodad ปีที่แล้ว

      I really wish that you were correct in your assessment but there was one major error and numerous minor errors. Please read my comment for details.

    • @michaelbauers8800
      @michaelbauers8800 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@vatodad Well, people watching this, probably are not going into aeronautics engineering, or that sort of thing. They are probably happy to hear the basics of jet engines. It's like with any technical subject. You will find the simple explanations will be somewhat misleading, but that can't be helped as complicated things are really complicated with many devil is in the detail stuff. Of course if you can do better, you should make your own improved video ( I am not being sarcastic, youtube can always use more videos, as people trying to understand may watch multiple videos.)

  • @petcatznz
    @petcatznz ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Superb, absolutely spot on presentation with perfectly paced detailed and fluid delivery. I was hooked from the start to finish. Thank you for posting.

  • @strikef16falcon58
    @strikef16falcon58 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I found this to be a excellent presentation explaining the basic principles of how a turbine engine works, and the various types of turbine engines .

  • @jimmartin618
    @jimmartin618 4 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    Absolutely fantastic presentation. Wish I had seen it as a teen ( when it was obviously produced)... Might have changed my future. Thank you for this education, many, many years later.

    • @tlg065
      @tlg065 ปีที่แล้ว

      @jim Martin me too

    • @Graham_Wideman
      @Graham_Wideman ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If you had seen it... you would have had a... reaction?

    • @shearthrust8542
      @shearthrust8542 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Graham_Wideman IF he did , u could call him a newtonian

  • @kerrickakinola7398
    @kerrickakinola7398 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    An excellent lecture. Love the old-school productions. Explains with just enough depth for an introduction course. Love it!

    • @dabneyoffermein595
      @dabneyoffermein595 ปีที่แล้ว

      Someone with a PhD must have done this presentation. There is no way to keep it all straight unless you are just a flat-out genius, such as what the inventors at Rolls Royce must have been. OMG, this is crazy.

  • @Wqk14xhddv7
    @Wqk14xhddv7 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Priceless Instructional Video
    Extremely well Presented 👍 ...

  • @rajasekhar9675
    @rajasekhar9675 4 ปีที่แล้ว +75

    This is an awesome lecture. One should definitely hear this! The jet engine concepts are easily grasped and one can learn the style of presentation too.

  • @sturman8
    @sturman8 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Thank you very very much for this wonderful and eye-opening explanation about jet engines!!

  • @stachowi
    @stachowi ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This was SO good! I'm jealous of who could watch this back in the 1980's...

  • @vidyasagarkotha1132
    @vidyasagarkotha1132 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    An Excellent Video, Great Lecture, Inspiring & Pumping, must watch by all the Aerospace Propulsion Engineers

  • @aaronwith2950
    @aaronwith2950 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This is truly priceless to anyone trying to understand these topics.

    • @mattb6646
      @mattb6646 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have no reason to learn this but it's interesting as hell regardless. I'm a machinist though, and we do occasionally do work for a turbo company called Borg Warner, not for jet engines but smaller engines

    • @aaronwith2950
      @aaronwith2950 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Matt B Yeah I am a Airplane mechanic and I learned more here then I did in multiple weeks of my training.

  • @fredfred2363
    @fredfred2363 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This answers so many questions I had! Thanks for uploading it. 👍🏻😀🇬🇧

  • @pavelow36
    @pavelow36 6 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    best jet engine learning in the internet. thanks for sharing this.

  • @allanben9795
    @allanben9795 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Never have jet engine fundamentals been presented so simply. This is a very useful video

    • @dennisp4395
      @dennisp4395 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think so too. I got me some ceiling fans i can use. Swap out the fiber for some metal blades i found in the junkyard. Or just cut up a ton of soda cans. Couple of 55 gal drums and a mister spray. There ya go!
      Redneck Air lines. Book early 👍 🤣🤣
      Seriously though, it was quite educational from simplistic to a more complex explanation.
      Loved it. They just aren't making them like they used to make them

  • @DGKFBGMd33Zy3
    @DGKFBGMd33Zy3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    If all my professors were like this guy I would’ve had 5 Nobel prizes by now

    • @JV-tw6lt
      @JV-tw6lt ปีที่แล้ว

      It is really basic and simple presentation to be honest. It is important to not exaggerate anything to obscene levels.

    • @DGKFBGMd33Zy3
      @DGKFBGMd33Zy3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JV-tw6lt who told you that it’s actually very important to exaggerate things.

    • @JV-tw6lt
      @JV-tw6lt ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DGKFBGMd33Zy3 I see a lot of fools online who are in the majority typically. They elevate people to god level one moment and drop them down to ground at the next. To avoid this one needs to be highly civilized, humble and rational minded.

  • @rockapedra1130
    @rockapedra1130 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    These old school presentations beat the pants off our more modern ones. I wonder what went wrong.

    • @mileswelch5136
      @mileswelch5136 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Govt got involved

    • @Triple_J.1
      @Triple_J.1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mileswelch5136 its always been involved.

    • @tenhendee5479
      @tenhendee5479 ปีที่แล้ว

      Preference for stupidity

    • @krishnannarayanan8819
      @krishnannarayanan8819 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Entertainment and trying to keep the viewer's attention due to modern dopamine addiction and low attention span ruined it.

  • @simflier8298
    @simflier8298 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I thoroughly enjoyed this class! So detailed! Learned a lot!

  • @Chris_at_Home
    @Chris_at_Home ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This reminds me of the class I had when I got a job on the assembly floor at P&WA in 1977. I assembled JT8s and JT9s. I’ve been in test cell control rooms. Some of those guys in there are probably working for the customer. We used to see someone from the airplane company and the airline buying that plane.

  • @nlabanok
    @nlabanok ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Worked at P&W from the late 80's thru the late 90's....I took a textbook directed version of this course but, either way, it is very nice coverage of the basic engine architecture as well as the thermodynamic & aerodynamic principles of jet engines. Fun product to work on....as a mechanical engineer, there are few jobs where you can get your hands on this much horsepower right out of school.

    • @francarcia3962
      @francarcia3962 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      my Dad tested Jet engines at P&W 60s, 70s and components in the '80s. He hung out in the back of the field near the fence for years

    • @highlandermachineworks5795
      @highlandermachineworks5795 ปีที่แล้ว

      We're you in Middletown, East fartford, Cheshire. Or another state? I was in Middletown for a short time

    • @nlabanok
      @nlabanok ปีที่แล้ว

      @@highlandermachineworks5795 in WPB, FL

  • @helihoot
    @helihoot ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I worked at a model company back in 83. We built a model very similar to that one. It was a PW F100

  • @abomarsyr103
    @abomarsyr103 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    better than most school lectures today who agrees

  • @Stu-SB
    @Stu-SB ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This is Gold ! YT is amazing for educational clips like this, I save these in a dedicated playlist

    • @dabneyoffermein595
      @dabneyoffermein595 ปีที่แล้ว

      No wonder these engines are so Jet-A starved.... fuel is just eaten up at such a fast rate that the wings and other fuel reservoirs are massive and very heavy. It's no wonder that these engines have to be MASSIVE to be able to move enough air to lift tons of mass into the air (weight of the passengers and airframe itself). Can you imagine all of the physics of an airplane having to come together and work flawlessly while human beings are being moved from point A to point B in these dangerous air-vessels? Lift, thrust, compression, pressurization, hydraulics, cooling, heating, comfort, electronics, weather, speed, materials, metallurgy and a myriad of other things all have to come together and work flawlessly., without fail. No wonder these high-speed air vessels fail every so often just on their own (not including pilot faults).

  • @mattapple2105
    @mattapple2105 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very good explanation how a jet engine works !

  • @alext8828
    @alext8828 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I put JP-7 in my car and it went around the block in 3 seconds. That stuff is great.

  • @kpec3
    @kpec3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Jet engines don't suck! I love them...

    • @aaronwith2950
      @aaronwith2950 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lol they do but, that's not the way your meaning. (Suck, squeeze, bang, blow)

    • @ELCADAROSA
      @ELCADAROSA 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Oh, no ...
      Jet engines do suck!
      And they blow! 😁

    • @kpec3
      @kpec3 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ELCADAROSA 😂

  • @bigm9190
    @bigm9190 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Reading the comments reveals a lot about the people who watch YT videos....
    THIS VIDEO IS INTENDED FOR GENERAL AUDIENCE NOT FOR ENGINEERS!
    If you throw Thermodynamics, aerodynamics, work, energy, momentum at the common mortal, he will stop watching. This is a well explained PRINCIPLE of how jet engines work! It is well spoken and shows in a simple way how this works.

  • @leokimvideo
    @leokimvideo ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Everything goes in the inlet of the engine, the rain, the snow, the ice AND the birds 🤕

    • @jeromewesselman4653
      @jeromewesselman4653 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not if the cats get em first! Yummm

    • @supersst838
      @supersst838 ปีที่แล้ว

      mostly air though

    • @sharoncassell9358
      @sharoncassell9358 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's what you call the sh*t hitting the fan. It's for the birds.

  • @skivvy3565
    @skivvy3565 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The history of the jet engine is actually fascinating, especially when you consider it was turned down for years during the war and the developer had basically no funding and had to work in a derelict workshop

    • @ghostdance56
      @ghostdance56 ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually it was the Nazi's who developed the jet engine. No one else on earth even knew the technology existed.

  • @Rwalt61
    @Rwalt61 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A good example of turboshaft engines are the RR/Allison 250C engines that power the MD500 or Bell Jet Ranger helicopters, a sweet sound on start-up, I must say.

  • @mikeconnery4652
    @mikeconnery4652 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The best and most through explinations

  • @MichaelDavis-zu2ko
    @MichaelDavis-zu2ko ปีที่แล้ว

    This is a great informative video. I like this man's demeanor.

  • @orunabho
    @orunabho ปีที่แล้ว

    What a comprehensive lecture. Marvelous to say the least. 🎉🎉🎉

  • @FractAlkemist
    @FractAlkemist ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video! Explained so much in detail and easy to follow. Best I’ve seen of all the youtube jet videos.
    Yet the one question I’ve had for years remains unanswered. With a rocket, it’s easy to see that the combustion gases push against the rocket nozzle itself, thus transferring thrust to the superstructure.
    With a turbojet, ALL the videos and explanations just say “Newtons Law”, gas jets out the back and gives forward thrust. But exactly WHAT is the exhaust gas “pushing against”?
    The best I can imagine is most is pushing against the forward structures of the combustion chambers, and a good portion is also effectively pushing against the compressed air at the last stage of the compressor.
    I imagine the compressed air forms a stationary front, just aft of the final blade wheel. And since exhaust gas cant really ‘push’ against air (another gas), it is actually the spinning compressor blades “generating” the “thrust” as they maintain 20-40 ATM compressed air pressure.
    Thus the “thrust” is actually ultimately generated in the main rotor itself, and transferred to the superstructure by the bearing system.
    I recall on commercial flights, at takeoff, the engines whine higher and higher and higher - then there’s a sudden ‘boom’ and solid roar - I think that is the stationary compressed air front forming and reaching static equilibrium with the combustion front.
    Anyone can comment on this?

  • @Mark_Ocain
    @Mark_Ocain 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Wow, this is pretty good!!! A primer before people go to channels like AgentJayZ LOL

  • @jcguilarte
    @jcguilarte 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Excelent explanation , it can not be found nowadays, something has been lost in modern teaching

  • @Nurhaal
    @Nurhaal ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Surprised at some of the terms. Perhaps I'm just younger and there's newer terms now?
    The After Burner is also called a 'Reheat'. The after burned section is sometimes referred to as a 'Flame Tube' or 'Reheat Section' or 'Reheat Tube', since it's literally just a tube. An empty can. Though it does use a jacket.
    The C-D Nozzel exit is also called an 'Ejector'. If the C-D nozzle is a variable one its a 'Variable CD Ejector'.
    Flame holders are briefly gone over here and I don't know if the description was adequate? The Flame Holdsr purposely causes turbulent air that spirals and stalls, for mixing and for maintaining the flame. Air that is super sonic will blow out the flame.
    Why?
    Because the Flame can only ignite so fast - there are two terms here, Flame front and Flame Propagation. It might surprise people to know but... for those of us Americans whom love our guns? We can tell you that we actually prefer slower burning powder better than faster powders for the charge. The slower power allows pressure to build and ultimate leads to better performance of muzzle velocities in most cases.
    The jet engine is no different. We are simply shooting a stream of air out the barrel instead of a bullet. The limit, though, is in reverse. If the air + fuel mixture can only propagate the flame front so quickly, then we need to slow down the air that's being ignited like we want to reduce the burn rate of an charge for a bullet. If we don't, the air will be moving too fast and out run the speed in which the flame propagates, and thus you have a flame out.
    Flame holders are of use in Combustion Chambers as well, depending on the engine. They're primarily to agitate and cause turbulence for more adequate mixing.
    The CD variable Nozzle and the Tube jacket are not just for accelerating or decelerating the ejected air stream. Ambient pressure can cause back pressure to occur and the bleed air from the jacket, provided by the bypass air, as well as the use of the variable nozzle ejector, all try to balance out that possible back pressure to ensure more efficient 'ejection' of the air stream. Remember, your goal is to not only throw as much air out the back as possible, Thrust = MxA of course... but you also want to make sure that you're imparting as much of that thrust to the engine's structure itself. It makes no use if you're throwing out so much thrust but have the thrust be diluted due to going off in all directions. You want to make sure all that thrust is pushing on your engine in the one, singular direction so that you're getting the maximum physical reaction out of that thrust mass.

    • @gaoxiaen1
      @gaoxiaen1 ปีที่แล้ว

      Would you want a faster-burning powder for short-barreled handguns?

  • @sajjadhossain2497
    @sajjadhossain2497 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very informative and eloquent. Thanks

  • @sonumbaeng
    @sonumbaeng ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice video covering the basics. 👍👏.

  • @icon520
    @icon520 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    THIS IS A TRUE, INSTRUCTIONAL KNOWLEDGE, I LOVE IT, AND ALL A JEWEL OF KNOWLEDGE WITH AERO SPACE TECHNOLOGY ...

  • @srthebox4946
    @srthebox4946 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This explains a very complicated concept in a very easy to understand way without glossing over information

  • @JK-sh2ij
    @JK-sh2ij ปีที่แล้ว

    Great vid. Absolutely rocking comb-over.

  • @TheLuminousOne
    @TheLuminousOne ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome video. Modern videos can't compete.

  • @skycorrigan6511
    @skycorrigan6511 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What year was this made? It's so fascinating to me to see these older videos

  • @derrickwilliams1902
    @derrickwilliams1902 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I learned a lot from this lecture.

  • @Kennedyumale
    @Kennedyumale ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for this wonderful explanation.

  • @anthonyxuereb792
    @anthonyxuereb792 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Rolls Royce employed three spools on their large engines if I'm not mistaken=Low-Intermediate-High pressure.

  • @MASTERETALKS
    @MASTERETALKS 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for this informative tutorial.

  • @scudfarcus4343
    @scudfarcus4343 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This video has orders of magnitude more instructive value than all of the turbo encabulator videos put together.

  • @joshuaking1516
    @joshuaking1516 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A really good documentary .one which I enjoyed watching a lot

  • @bhuuthesecond
    @bhuuthesecond 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good watch. Learned a lot. Didn’t know all those veiny outside tubes carry lubricant and air. And how a turbojet engine basically has one moving part lol. Though I wonder how the pneumatic starter gets it’s energy?

  • @jmhowlett
    @jmhowlett ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video, his explanation of how a jet engine works has really helped me understand why jet engines takes thousands and thousands of gallons of kerosene for a 5 hour flight to cross the country. Plus once the plane is high up in the sky in a oxygen rich environment it takes more fuel to burn hotter.........Gosh, no wonder why jets are so expensive, it's because they are more complex than a combustion engine car.

    • @knocksensor3203
      @knocksensor3203 ปีที่แล้ว

      I thought high up in the sky , was oxygen Deficient 🤔

    • @jmhowlett
      @jmhowlett ปีที่แล้ว

      @@knocksensor3203 your right, my mistake lol. That's why they have the oxygen masks fall down in an emergency, and down close to the ground is where all the oxygen settles.

  • @to-tt7fc
    @to-tt7fc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nothing better than this. I call the approach Simplistic Conceptualization. Offfical term ? Everything is good but the concept is even clearer when slowly emphasizes that in supersonic mode, the convergent/divergent principle is reverse. Also air enters into the engine front end needs to be subsonic. That explains why the nozzle throat is that way and why the nozzle opens in after-burner (supersonic) mode.

  • @jerrynakoja4331
    @jerrynakoja4331 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great lecture I love it

  • @xXDiver12Xx
    @xXDiver12Xx 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This video explains literally IT ALL!!!!!

  • @murugan_kovai
    @murugan_kovai ปีที่แล้ว

    This channel deserves multi million subscribers..

  • @phrodendekia
    @phrodendekia หลายเดือนก่อน

    I did not know all this engineering wass behind my F100 engine. What a noble pickup truck 😂😂

  • @kennethdefreitas3120
    @kennethdefreitas3120 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is great I learned a lot 💯👍🏾

  • @sl6840
    @sl6840 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love instructional videos like this, and especially this authority voice :D

  • @deanschulze3129
    @deanschulze3129 ปีที่แล้ว

    One question I have about this explanation is why the combustion exhaust all seems to go out the exhaust. The combusting gases would go in all directions, so some would go forward too.

  • @Yabbagabbagool
    @Yabbagabbagool ปีที่แล้ว +2

    wow this is super easy to understand thanks!

  • @famousbangla7689
    @famousbangla7689 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yes Boss! Every action has a same reaction.

  • @noArguments
    @noArguments 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really happy to got recomendation from TH-cam for this video only.
    🔥🔥

  • @westoniii
    @westoniii ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm gonna fall asleep so hard to this later. Thanks for the upload, excel spreadsheet videos stopped working after a while.

  • @1089S
    @1089S ปีที่แล้ว

    Outstanding presentation!

  • @hatchsyoutube
    @hatchsyoutube ปีที่แล้ว +4

    A visually, educationally great presentation! one constructive criticism: there seems
    to be a conspicuous absence of any information on the turbo encabulator. Otherwise though, it’s Huell-Hauser-level gold :)

    • @gaoxiaen1
      @gaoxiaen1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbo_encabulator

  • @horstebreedow8608
    @horstebreedow8608 ปีที่แล้ว

    I learnt a lot from this video, I thank I'll be a jet mechanik

  • @supersst838
    @supersst838 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice presentation of axial combustolators

  • @daniellong415
    @daniellong415 ปีที่แล้ว

    Im 47 years old and today watched this for the first time. Call me a slow starter!

  • @MichuNeo
    @MichuNeo 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    39:53 British vs American moment ;) Great video, cheers!

  • @AngryHybridApe
    @AngryHybridApe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Are there any videos of compression test only using simulated spin up?

  • @Tiagomottadmello
    @Tiagomottadmello ปีที่แล้ว

    Very, very cool vídeo ! 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

  • @halamish1
    @halamish1 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent presentation

  • @danedgar1539
    @danedgar1539 ปีที่แล้ว

    Found it! I watched this when I was in high school and have been looking for it for a long time!

  • @RaimoJackson
    @RaimoJackson ปีที่แล้ว

    Great document!

  • @10000words1
    @10000words1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That cop really looks like he means business

  • @Mia-di9nx
    @Mia-di9nx ปีที่แล้ว

    Very pleased that this was recommended to me 👌

  • @joydasgupta9445
    @joydasgupta9445 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Where can I found the full series? What's the name of the professor?

    • @avitor500
      @avitor500 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, that would be great to find the full series.

    • @andyharman3022
      @andyharman3022 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This was a video shown to new Pratt & Whitney employees for training. Late 1980's would be my guess.

  • @davidkartwright9003
    @davidkartwright9003 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Using a bullet recoil as an example of jet propulsion ... nice

  • @01menyou
    @01menyou ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What would happen in a vacuum?
    On the earth, the issuing thrust pushes against the atmosphere.
    In a vacuum, what does the thrust push against?

    • @Triple_J.1
      @Triple_J.1 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It doesn't have to "push against" anything.
      In a vacuum, a rockets fuel and oxidizer is burned and converted to hot gasses which expand and are propelled through a nozzle. The acceleration of the propellant mass creates an equal and opposite reaction that is thrust.
      A Jet engine (turbine engine) is an air breathing internal combustion engine and it cannot operate in a vacuum. Only a rocket that brings along its own oxidizer can operate in the vacuum of outer space.

    • @01menyou
      @01menyou ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Triple_J.1 I realise the difference between a rocket and a jet.
      My question is about the action of the thrust.
      The thrust is a gas and so pushes in all directions at once. Inside the engine against the internal surfaces, and outside against the atmosphere.
      The fire hose in the video shows the reaction of the operators, to the reaction of the water hitting the atmosphere.
      My misunderstanding, is that in a vacuum the thrust would empty into nothingness.
      I've seen a video of a balloon powered, toy car. When released the car shot off, as you'd expect, across the floor.
      However, when a vacuum cleaner hose was directed across the balloon's discharge flow the car remained still. The thrust was sucked away and the reaction to move the toy lost.

    • @mytube001
      @mytube001 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The exhaust gases are thrown out of the engine backwards. Momentum is always conserved, so an equal momentum is imparted to the engine in the exact opposite direction - forward. No atmosphere needed. The jet engine needs air to operate, but that air can come from a tank and then the engine would operate fine outside of an atmosphere (the air tank would not be practical at all, but that's an engineering problem, not a physics problem).

    • @01menyou
      @01menyou ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mytube001 OK.
      Imagine it would be possible to engage reverse thrust while the plane was stationary.
      Which direction would the plane roll?

    • @alext8828
      @alext8828 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@01menyou No. You got that a little wrong. If you sit in your office chair and throw books at your co-worker, your chair (if it's on a nice smooth floor) will move the other way. Did you think those books were pushing on the atmosphere? That "reaction" is what pushes a jet engine forward. They decided not to throw books out the window so they throw hot gas out instead. It's one of the most important and misunderstood principles in physical science.

  • @jg-bd3hr
    @jg-bd3hr ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It’s an oldie but a goodie.

  • @oddsman01
    @oddsman01 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Who the hell was this video originally for?

  • @siavoshkasravi398
    @siavoshkasravi398 ปีที่แล้ว

    A nice video. One thing I didn't get is where the thrust force is borne on the engine body. When the jet flow pushes the air at the back of the engine, a reaction force pushes back. This is where the thrust comes from. If this reaction force was a hand, where would it be placed?

    • @xFalconFixer
      @xFalconFixer ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Answering your question is easier with a drawing etc. Let's see if I can help answer your question through text. First off, in my description, do not add 'afterburner - augmentation' to what you are seeing. Afterburner, aka augmentation, is a separate discussion.
      Trust is multiple factors (physics) the jet (air-exhust) stream exiting the exhaust as the pressure (exhaust) is expelled produces thrust. Even better yet, there are INTERNAL forces from the thrust produced. These forces are pushing inside the whole jet engine.
      These internal forces push energy through and against the fan, compressor, burner, turbine, and exhaust (airplane). In your mind, see arrows (air/pressure) internally pushing the engine. Again, what moves a jet engine are the internal push and the exhaust push.
      Blowing up a balloon holding the end closed... There are forces inside, but don't move the balloon... It needs an exit (exhaust). Opening the balloon end, the expelled air and internal pressure push the balloon.
      If you grabbed a jet engine (using your hand), you'd hold/wrap the whole engine... Then you are the external force propelling the airplane.
      Lastly, back to the balloon when you let it go - it moves sporadically everywhere. To control this random reaction, we add flight controls so we can control the direction of flight.
      Now do not misunderstand; my explanation doesn't cover the theory of flight... That's a different explanation.
      I hope my explanation helps you understand the complex process of a jet engine.

    • @siavoshkasravi398
      @siavoshkasravi398 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@xFalconFixer Guess I have got my answer thanks. If we imagine the engine like a tube which is closed at one end, there will be pressure inside the tube (to the whole inner surface) which will try to move the tube toward anywhere but the open end. Based on this model anything inside this tube is under pressure. Getting back to real engines this pressure is to the compressors (high), body (high), turbines (low) and exit funnel (low).

    • @xFalconFixer
      @xFalconFixer ปีที่แล้ว

      From what you said as a tube...both ends need to be open as the presses need a place to go. (Equal and opposite action/reaction.) You do know how a jet engine works? Suck, Squeeze, Bang, Blow.
      An internal combustion engine creates similar power/force - but we transfer that energy from the engine block etc. to the driveshaft. The driveshaft is (partially) mainly what will move the machine. There are too internal forces as I described for a jet.

    • @siavoshkasravi398
      @siavoshkasravi398 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@xFalconFixer Yes the close end I said to model the compressor side of the engine (inlet).

  • @tonygovender3805
    @tonygovender3805 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank thank , this is an excellent video.

  • @faizalhana2285
    @faizalhana2285 ปีที่แล้ว

    this one here is truly a gem

  • @m.alfatehmurkaz7247
    @m.alfatehmurkaz7247 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very informative

  • @pabloalvarez8737
    @pabloalvarez8737 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love this Jewel 💎

  • @oldspicey6001
    @oldspicey6001 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is "flame out"?. Is it because the burner stage is not getting enough air to sustain continued ignition? Does it literally mean the flame runs out? Or does a lack of pressure cause the ignition point to move closer to the compressor? I guess that would cause the turbine to move slower causing less air in causing less burn?

  • @djackmanson
    @djackmanson ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I thought for a second this would be a sales pitch for people who wanted to generate inverse reactive current for unilateral phase detractors

    • @andyharman3022
      @andyharman3022 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Using cardinal grammeters, no doubt.

  • @giovannynavarro97
    @giovannynavarro97 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Does this means that it needs aluminum materials for heat sustenance???

    • @jubuttib
      @jubuttib ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Probably more like titanium, etc... Aluminum is a bit, how do I put it, "melty". =)
      I mean sure, some of the cooler parts could certainly use aluminum, but even the compressor exit and diffusor temperatures are near the melting point of aluminum, and it does get quite soft even before it melts.

  • @hawleygriffin1800
    @hawleygriffin1800 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm still missing something here. I understand precisely how a 4 stroke automobile engine creates power by the burning of fuel in the combustion chamber and the expansion of the air fuel mixture forces the piston down when intake and exhaust valves are closed. But a jet engine is "open" on both ends. Why doesn't the jet fuel/air mixture expand forward instead of backward or both ways? In an internal combustion engine the ONLY way the burning fuel/air mixture can expand is by pushing the piston down and turning the crankshaft. What am I missing? I don't understand why it always goes out the back of the engine. And where does the power com from to turn the fans and the turbine?

  • @dineshsingh-gb6un
    @dineshsingh-gb6un ปีที่แล้ว

    Esme Sara khel right quantity of fuel (input )+ parts aceept that input without any problem , and exhaust and sound comes in a right sequence

  • @christincherian4315
    @christincherian4315 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you give an idea about the actuator variant for operating the 3 stage VGWing and VIGW