Vintage Cube Stipulation Draft: All Artifacts

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ก.ย. 2024
  • Welcome to the first of my stipulation drafts, where I have rules I have to follow during the draft portion. This one is All-Artifacts, where I have to take an artifact or card that references them whenever possible. Let's see how the robots do! Feel free to suggest new stipulations in the comments as well.
    Subscribe to the channel: / @lsvargas
    Thanks for watching!
    ---------
    Twitch: / lsv
    Twitter: / lsv
    Discord: / discord
    #lsvmtg #lsvcubedraft #lsvdailyuploads #vintagecube #vintagecubedraft #mtg

ความคิดเห็น • 130

  • @AGray21
    @AGray21 ปีที่แล้ว +235

    I'm down for more stipulations in the future because they keep things fresh, but personally I don't care about adhering exactly to the letter of them. I think stipulations like this are more interesting if they're something like "I'm going to draft an artifact deck." - and if that means you take ancient tomb over a talisman, or some fixing that lets you play your artifact enabling spells, or balance for that matter, that's totally fine with me. I hope other people who watch the channel feel similarly.
    Love the videos and daily uploads.

    • @moodragonx2
      @moodragonx2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Fully agreed.
      I do think there's something to be said for forcing yourself to try to live the dream rather than taking more moderated picks (eg. taking redundant combo pieces over mana fixing), but ancient tomb and balance are clearly in line with trying to draft the cool deck even if they don't say artifact anywhere on them (in the case of balance that's why it's so great with artifacts).

    • @Sivarias
      @Sivarias ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You beat me by a few hours. I scrolled down to post this exact comment.

    • @redwood1542
      @redwood1542 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yup, if stipulations become so strict then there's no decisions involved

    • @shadowphoenixxx
      @shadowphoenixxx ปีที่แล้ว

      I mean, with stipulations like this one, it makes a lot of sense yeah, because it still has potential to end up as a solid deck. But there might be straight up stupid stipulations, where the fun is in passing all the optimal stuff.
      Stipulations that seem fun
      - Multicolor only
      - Superfriends
      -

    • @BobertJoe
      @BobertJoe ปีที่แล้ว

      I think strict stipulations are useful to avoid an audible. If you are picking between a talisman and say, underworld breach, the stipulation makes it obvious what the pick is. But the more powerful choice is to take the breech, and its not like you cant just run Breach with LED to do some silly stuff even if you arent winning on the spot. And now that you have breach and LED, might as well pick up the brainfreeze and no reason not to include it.
      Like the deck LSV ended up with was definitely an artifact deck, but would something like 12 mana rocks and Tendrils not also be an artifact deck? The difference between being an artifact deck and THE artifact deck is the point of the strict stipulation, imo.

  • @crytical7
    @crytical7 ปีที่แล้ว +202

    I love a good stipulation draft, and honestly i think that if a card is better because it enhances the artifact strategy, like balance or ancient tomb, I'm a big fan of seeing you just snap it up.

    • @GreenHam0929
      @GreenHam0929 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I agree!

    • @seanhutt4621
      @seanhutt4621 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      💯 the stip imho should always be trying to build the strongest deck around those cards not just blindly taking the card type

    • @travelingtango
      @travelingtango ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Definitely agree!

  • @roarmalf
    @roarmalf ปีที่แล้ว +29

    I agree that Ancient Tomb fits the stipulation but so does Balance. They're both borderline, but I think the point should be that cards that combo better with artifacts than other cards should be the stipulation rather than specifically mentioning them. I like stipulations that push you to draft something unusual but don't punish you for no reason.

  • @elleeVee
    @elleeVee ปีที่แล้ว +30

    he really said "im forcing artifacts no one can stop me" and urza immediately shows up?? i love it

    • @jeffe2267
      @jeffe2267 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      A human artificer is never late, nor is he early, he arrives precisely when he means to.

  • @GreenHam0929
    @GreenHam0929 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I really like this approach to a "stipulation" draft where you get to see someone who's really good draft a specific archetype they might not normally, rather than "Well I opened ancestral recall but I have to take Sphinx of the Steel Wind", that's just less fun imo.

  • @rsh0561
    @rsh0561 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    I have fond memories of all the weird stipulation drafts Luis and Gabby did back in the day. Good ol' Corpse Dance Siege-Gang is still one of my favorite TH-cam videos!
    I'm sure that this (and future videos) will provide some similarly entertaining nonsense.

    • @douglaskissack121
      @douglaskissack121 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      LSV trying to convince Gabby that Ancient Tomb is an artifact has probably happened on stream a few times.

  • @BirdBrotherGames
    @BirdBrotherGames ปีที่แล้ว +6

    finally! The return of the stipulation draft! LSV stip drafts in particular are what got me into watching magic content. Now all we are missing is alternating blind picks with Gabby 👀

  • @lurro9963
    @lurro9963 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I would love some alternate blind picks as long ago with gaby😅😅

  • @amills12334
    @amills12334 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    It has become my daily routine to eat lunch and watch LSV draft cube.
    Also Balance is a messed up magic card.

    • @alext.1244
      @alext.1244 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      my daily routine is to eat LSV and watch lunch

  • @thrawncaedusl717
    @thrawncaedusl717 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Stips are back! Do a “must attack with Eldrazi to win” stip (this encourages any combo that can cast an Eldrazi, in contrast to previous big creature stips which prevented taking things like sneak attack).

    • @DeltaSixDJ
      @DeltaSixDJ ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I like that approach, rather than "have to take x" it's building around a particular constraint or win condition.

  • @quarkraven
    @quarkraven ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "I still think I'm going to win if i draw a land. [Draws land] well let's find out shall we?" Classic LSV banter and I'm here for it

  • @raymondgreen9379
    @raymondgreen9379 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    1) I always feel that stips should have exceptions for power and lands
    2) I think that mox opal might have tricked someone into taking academy or workshop

    • @BetaJim22
      @BetaJim22 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think 2-3 seats to the left of Luis could very reasonably have seen a relatively weak pack and speculated on academy or workshop for fun and immediately bailed after not seeing any artifacts since Luis was taking them all. Has happened to Kenji and Luis multiple times themselves.

  • @masonashlock5461
    @masonashlock5461 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    @8:20 I'd say you could take Tireless Tracker/Thraben. Not that you'd want either, but I think it'd count. And if Lion's eye wasn't in the pack I'd say you'd have to take one of them.

    • @Rockwell218
      @Rockwell218 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Or opposition

  • @emperornapoleon6204
    @emperornapoleon6204 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The best way to enjoy dinner and/or end the day on a Friday👍🏻

  • @ebayguy5930
    @ebayguy5930 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A small improvement to be had, although I don't think it affected the outcome of any game but when you have zuron orb in play and your ursa's saga gets to stage 3, the trigger is already on the stack to sack it and then go get something of man of value zero or one. So you can actually sacrifice the land itself two years you're on or in gain to life, and the other trigger still plays

  • @CaptainKhriZ
    @CaptainKhriZ ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'd be supportive of the ancient tomb pick because it's so good with colorless cards. It just happens to be so good it doesn't have to say artifact.

  • @Curt-ze6hl
    @Curt-ze6hl ปีที่แล้ว

    I didn't think you'd give into stip requests. I'm glad you did because I love artifact decks.
    I'm also glad you took some liberties. Drafting every artifact you see is boring. Drafting cards that would be good in the artifact deck is far more interesting

  • @servantofdiscord3586
    @servantofdiscord3586 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I love stipulation drafts. Modest suggestion: Team Stipulation Draft. 8 of you throw 3 stips or something into a pool, everyone draws randomly, and you all draft your stips in the same pod without knowing each others. Might be fun, but might be dumb. Maybe have a 3rd party create 8 stips instead so you dont have 4 artifact deck stips.

    • @BetaJim22
      @BetaJim22 ปีที่แล้ว

      OMG This would be amazing content. You're a genius.

  • @joseazevedo3432
    @joseazevedo3432 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It is crazy that you don't say "Echo of Cheons"

  • @6litz585
    @6litz585 ปีที่แล้ว

    THANK YOU THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE ANCIENT TOMB OMG I WAS GONNA CRY IF YOU DIDNT

  • @h.martinez
    @h.martinez ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Stipulation idea: only multicolored cards or cards to improve the strategy (e.g. lands, noble hierarch, talismans). The only exception being power. If there are no cards for the strategy you can pick whatever.

  • @CDB123EZ
    @CDB123EZ ปีที่แล้ว

    Glad to see some artifact plays, I love artifact decks. Do more of these speculation decks!

  • @jrjamesson
    @jrjamesson ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the stip and how the deck turned out! I feel like seraph could be cut - not what your deck wants as a 3-drop and a much less exciting welder target than kaldra or trip titan. It's just a medium midrange creature when your deck can go so much bigger

  • @quinnquitars
    @quinnquitars ปีที่แล้ว

    Lsv drafting my favorite archetype and on a stipulation? Count me in!

  • @theironmountain
    @theironmountain ปีที่แล้ว

    i'd like to think if gaby was seated beside you, she would have told you you HAD to pick slime ball, to which you would have agreed to, and then you'd still snap up the narset, and maybe 3-4 picks later gaby would realize it and get mad at you.
    hoping we get another stip down the line where gooby is there to keep you honest, even if - and ESPECIALLY if it makes the deck less functional.
    either way, so appreciative of the daily uploads. the golden age is now.

  • @jeffe2267
    @jeffe2267 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mox Diamond definitely showed its power, but not always on our side.

  • @Jake-iz6rp
    @Jake-iz6rp ปีที่แล้ว

    Really enjoying your content. Keep up the good work!

  • @jeremylippert4222
    @jeremylippert4222 ปีที่แล้ว

    Get home late from work, ah another LSV cube video. Ease the day away

  • @mstone2573
    @mstone2573 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    browning out

  • @Alex-dk4px
    @Alex-dk4px ปีที่แล้ว

    Loved this stipulation draft! I remember the ones you used to do with Gaby

  • @chaosbeans
    @chaosbeans ปีที่แล้ว +1

    IMO in this stipulation, choosing Baleful Strix over Mox Opal is like not choosing a Mox power

  • @doozay5211
    @doozay5211 ปีที่แล้ว

    I played a league after this video dropped and all 3 matches were against artifact stipulation decks. The LSV effect is real lol

  • @jorgereyna8788
    @jorgereyna8788 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mox opal was so sick for this deck

  • @lordjaraxxus3864
    @lordjaraxxus3864 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ancient tomb gets the approval in my book

  • @Princeofseance
    @Princeofseance ปีที่แล้ว

    Return of the king

  • @john_cat
    @john_cat ปีที่แล้ว

    Love stip drafts :) At least once in a while

  • @HazmanFTW
    @HazmanFTW 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I feel like being able to take a land, esp an on colour one like the 2 UR ones you passed in pack 3 you could take as that helps the artifacts.

  • @TheShadowarcher5000
    @TheShadowarcher5000 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the idea of stipulation drafts!

  • @JackTR21
    @JackTR21 ปีที่แล้ว

    This looks like my artifact drafts. Deck looks absolutely nuts then boom I'm 1-2 or 0-3 for no reason

  • @Fi4z
    @Fi4z ปีที่แล้ว

    I was really surprised to notice the difference when you changed the mic setup. it actually does something. who knew

  • @rutasel6726
    @rutasel6726 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i think the easiest combo with displacer and a planeswalker is t3feri, you just need a 0 mana or mana positive artifact and youre off to the races

  • @grantsummers1761
    @grantsummers1761 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Strix over mox opal is crazy for this stipulation

  • @judeloire1522
    @judeloire1522 ปีที่แล้ว

    I always find it amusing when LSV plays against a card and says "That card is not particularly good" then next draft he picks the same card and is like "This card is just too good." LOL I know it's because of circumstances in which the card is presented, but it is still funny.

  • @peisenxu952
    @peisenxu952 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would like to see some stronger stipulations rather than ones as soft as what the other comments are mostly suggesting. Don't make it unfun, but it is a pleasure to see someone skilled work their way around stronger stips than just "archetype I don't normally play, everything goes". Maybe a unnegotionable stip, but with a "reverse ban list" of cards like time walk etc.

  • @LethalPigeon7
    @LethalPigeon7 ปีที่แล้ว

    yeeeeees! More stips please

  • @gayedemiray
    @gayedemiray ปีที่แล้ว

    YASS, love to see stip draft!

  • @ILLKAZE
    @ILLKAZE ปีที่แล้ว

    I love this stipulation, but it should be a Stipulation for an archetype instead of "All artifacts". This could open up to different stipulation episodes that will be fun!

  • @bsnoguera
    @bsnoguera ปีที่แล้ว

    It makes total sense to consider ancient tomb in this stipulation

  • @diegosouza6484
    @diegosouza6484 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Last game did't worth cast the Mightstone and Weakstone to kill the dragon?

  • @ronaldrage2118
    @ronaldrage2118 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    when your so good at mtg drafting that you nerf yourself just for fun xD

  • @xcver
    @xcver ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I dunno about not bringing in vindicate already thought after game 1 that seraph does nothing and having a way to kill his PW would be good. But not bringing it in after game 2?

  • @abcdefghijkl5408
    @abcdefghijkl5408 ปีที่แล้ว

    "Acidic slime doesnt really fit the spirit of the stipulation".....you would make a good lawyer (or pension actuary!)😂

  • @mclark347
    @mclark347 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would have said any colorless card is also fine, so that would include any lands you may want.

  • @simplecliche5833
    @simplecliche5833 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’m always a big fan of top

  • @kaizo_girl
    @kaizo_girl ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the content LSV. Been a regular viewers of these drafts.
    Two things rattling around in my head.
    First, I think the better version of a stipulation draft would be to draft the best version of a deck possible as opposed to draft a specific type of card.
    Second, while it really doesn't matter because Forth Eorlingas/nut draw, M3G3, wouldn't the better play be to spend the five mana to case Mightstone and Weakstone to kill the dragon and then cast the talisman? That would leave the construct big enough to trade and put you at relative parity?

  • @JoshJelin
    @JoshJelin ปีที่แล้ว +1

    IMO it's fine to take stuff like Balance and Mana Drain in an artifact stipulation draft. What artifact deck passes Balance?

  • @TheTimspeights
    @TheTimspeights ปีที่แล้ว

    Love me a stipulation draft, especially with a seasoned and enjoyable pro.

  • @manicka111
    @manicka111 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Forth Eorlingas is an absurd card

  • @dr_volberg
    @dr_volberg ปีที่แล้ว

    10:42 Twice you didn't even mention Skydiver - fits the stipulation and might actually be better than Batterskull (specially given that Stoneforge Mystic does not strictly speaking fit the stipulation since it mentions "equipment" and not "artifact")

  • @Ringbearer79
    @Ringbearer79 ปีที่แล้ว

    What could be an interesting stipulation: adher by the rules of a companion, even if its not in your sideboard. Lutri of course is too easy ;)

  • @alext.1244
    @alext.1244 ปีที่แล้ว

    "There deck actually looks alot worse now..." then he gets t2 Questin Beast t3 Goldspan t4 Eothfucknlungus! LOOL damn!

  • @nikmidclayton5933
    @nikmidclayton5933 ปีที่แล้ว

    I forsee some future storm stip drafts

  • @ExtraVictory
    @ExtraVictory ปีที่แล้ว

    Balance MVP yet again

  • @Laevateinn-
    @Laevateinn- ปีที่แล้ว

    i love your intro btw

  • @mattdespard6576
    @mattdespard6576 ปีที่แล้ว

    "it would hurt me too much psychically to pass" xD

  • @benjamindunlap4255
    @benjamindunlap4255 ปีที่แล้ว

    Match 2 game 1: turn 2 was it better to play zuran orb and ancient tomb so that you could sac the saga for 2 life after the tutor trigger goes on the stack?

  • @thegreatmajora13
    @thegreatmajora13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i feel like ancient tomb and city of traitors are honorary artifact cards

  • @tornadoeye
    @tornadoeye ปีที่แล้ว

    Stipulation Draft: Balance

  • @josiahtoole4376
    @josiahtoole4376 ปีที่แล้ว

    I support the Ancient Tomb pick!

  • @RainbowRandolf
    @RainbowRandolf ปีที่แล้ว

    Im surprised the line on the last saga turn wasnt "float mana, get top, spin top" for best possible chance at hitting Balance.

    • @BetaJim22
      @BetaJim22 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think the problem with that line is that balance doesn't do anything on that last saga turn because it would leave the dragon in play. His only out was to trade his token with the questing beast and THEN balance, which also means he didn't have life to spare for ancient tomb. If he can't use ancient tomb then he really needs to get mana with the saga.
      EDIT: Watching it again I guess the reason he couldn't get top and look for balance was entirely because he made the token EOT in the first place. In retrospect he should have just not made the token and did your line....though he would have still lost to the Forth Eorlingas even after finding balance because opponent would have still had 4 mana and cards in hand after the balance and I don't think LSV could have beaten a kobold let alone 2 hasty 2/2s on 6 life turning off his ancient tomb.

  • @klarifie
    @klarifie ปีที่แล้ว +2

    why in the last game were there 2 mox diamonds?

    • @inspectormagic5341
      @inspectormagic5341 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I was wondering this myself

    • @AREAlhero
      @AREAlhero ปีที่แล้ว +1

      These are draft leagues, so your opponent is not necessarily in the same drafting pod as you were, they just share your record

  • @hamishfox
    @hamishfox ปีที่แล้ว

    How does the round 3 opponent have a mox diamond when we also have a mox diamond?????

  • @Wuzseen
    @Wuzseen ปีที่แล้ว

    Time Walk stipulation: Any card with the word "Time" or "Walk" in it must be picked before any others. (So far as I can tell only 10 cards actually fit this stipulation in the current cube)

  • @gijsberthoogendijk4265
    @gijsberthoogendijk4265 ปีที่แล้ว

    How can both have a mox diamond in the last match?

  • @askehansen8620
    @askehansen8620 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ancient tomb is brown

  • @MatthewOrlettiJustForFun
    @MatthewOrlettiJustForFun ปีที่แล้ว

    planeswalker stip!

  • @wackaflacka548
    @wackaflacka548 ปีที่แล้ว

    How the heck did balance wheel lmao

  • @benlopacki3611
    @benlopacki3611 ปีที่แล้ว

    LSV getting owned by a deck he was just chatting rubbish about is great

  • @torresgiuliani2759
    @torresgiuliani2759 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are so lucky man ahhahaha GG

  • @hamishfox
    @hamishfox ปีที่แล้ว

    Passing parallax Wave? I'm offended.

  • @tomsmith4698
    @tomsmith4698 ปีที่แล้ว

    omg yes

  • @jakecashin
    @jakecashin ปีที่แล้ว

    Just parroting that I have no problem with picking cards that don't literally say artifact in the text if they fit the archetype.

  • @cashnsplash8939
    @cashnsplash8939 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thraben inspector makes an artifact

  • @ceribralboy4468
    @ceribralboy4468 ปีที่แล้ว

    Imo, Balance is an artifact card *because* it doesn't say artifact on it

  • @IfNedWereHere
    @IfNedWereHere ปีที่แล้ว

    Yep. Consistency. 😅

  • @JBH2989
    @JBH2989 ปีที่แล้ว

    ancient tomb definitely counts

  • @Its_McKennon
    @Its_McKennon 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Seems like a lot of people like stipulation drafts, I would argue the actual draft is very uninteresting, cause you only have 1 or 2 options, so most of your picks are not up to you, and the only interesting bit are the matches. I don't feel like I gained much watching the draft and could have just skipped to round 1

  • @bigwig8657
    @bigwig8657 ปีที่แล้ว

    I feel like Ancient tomb counts as artifact stip.

  • @marksmith8601
    @marksmith8601 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ancient tomb has to be allowed for artifact stipulation.

  • @martinphillips2461
    @martinphillips2461 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Stips.

  • @Jules-vf1zq
    @Jules-vf1zq ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How the fuck did balance wheel

    • @kingfuzzy2
      @kingfuzzy2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Very few people realize that white is the strongest mono colour in cube

  • @bevrosity
    @bevrosity ปีที่แล้ว

    that bwu tokens deck in round one was actually pretty sweet.

  • @Andreas_Buhl
    @Andreas_Buhl ปีที่แล้ว

    More Stipulations please! 🎉

  • @kukuc96
    @kukuc96 ปีที่แล้ว

    Balance showing that it's the most inappropriately named card ever, on account of being imbalanced.

  • @RamyASMR
    @RamyASMR ปีที่แล้ว

    Yeah, picking talisman over ancient tomb would just suck for you and everyone watching, so therefore let‘s not be THAT strict tbh

  • @yO-xe3ny
    @yO-xe3ny ปีที่แล้ว

    Day 6 of asking for Dream Halls, Ultimatums and Mizzix Mastery to flash them all back.

  • @AlexG12345
    @AlexG12345 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sadly I don’t get the chance to play much cube or magic myself but I love watching the cube content and seeing all the different decks and powerful cards you can put together! Keep it up! 🥳🤌🏻

  • @neil5652
    @neil5652 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think the ancient tomb is cheating, mostly because there is a difference between forcing a deck and a stipulation. Part of the fun is being forced to miss out on "the pick" because of the stipulation. I'd be fine with it if it was one of the exceptions at the beginning though. Either way I hope you keep it up. I want to see take the 6+ drops or was it 7? The one you did during one of the Ravnica Blocks.

  • @Matt-dc8lp
    @Matt-dc8lp ปีที่แล้ว

    Lands shouldn't count in a stip

  • @gothic2fan
    @gothic2fan ปีที่แล้ว +1

    don't realy like this kind of stipulation. forcing a deck is fine but forcing yourself to bad picks is not fun