ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.ย. 2024
- Subscribe for more videos like this: th-cam.com/users/sub...
In a wide-ranging interview with Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer conducted by Harvard Law professor and Bloomberg View columnist Noah Feldman, we look at the issues and challenges confronting the Court at a time when legislation and the law are subject to unusually heightened political passions.
Follow us on Facebook: / 92ndstreety
Twitter: / 92y
Tumblr: / 92y
Instagram: / 92ndstreety
92Y.org: 92Y.org
Interviewer was a little rude but Justice Breyer is such an intellectual at heart. He has a passion for knowledge and even if you disagree with how his jurisprudencial philosophy was, I think he is sincere and so passionate, like Scalia whom I disagreed with so much but he was firm in his beliefs
This is what real plurality looks like in judicial review it’s a hot repartee… every period and every coma fought for …every inch of the logic challenged and thought thru… this is a beautiful display of discourse between these two people.
I am really fascinated by Breyer and his logic and just over all vibe.
Definitely the best type of interview, gets the plant from the root
I’m going to miss Justice Breyer but I think Justice Jackson will do great :)
Why did he try to interrupt Justice Breyer so much?
So that he would provide concrete answers when he tried to deviate out of the true essence of the amazingly deep philosophical questions.
This is what real plurality looks like in judicial review it’s a hot repartee… every period and every coma fought for …every inch of the logic challenged and thought thru… this is a beautiful display of discourse between these two people.
He and his Colleagues have a huge headache legally defending Their psychology.
Noah Feldman is unnecessarily adversarial at times throughout this interview.
That’s his interviewing style. He’s great.
It is stupid disrespectful to even imagine that any of the 9 justices, who are after all technocrats at heart, can be dissuaded from doing what technocrats tend towards by something as relatively trite as their religious dispositions.
It seems like you worked really hard on this sentence. Unfortunately, its kind of crappy though.
@@christopherperillo8037 Not really, I was a bit upset at the time by the implications being made.
Pompous
ERIC R BINFORD MR INNOVATOR UTUBE
I RESPECT THE LAWS
I RESPECT THE CONGRESS......
ERIC R BINFORD MR INNOVATOR UTUBE
let me know
I never made report
On 7 years of
moving forward
BUT block BACK
from. LEADERSHIP
poor
jane college ii //nd.D
ERIC R BINFORD MR INNOVATOR UTUBE
let me know
I never made report
On 7 years of
moving forward
BUT block BACK
from. LEADERSHIP
poor