Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer and Noah Feldman

Subscribe for more videos like this: th-cam.com/users/sub...
In a wide-ranging interview with Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer conducted by Harvard Law professor and Bloomberg View columnist Noah Feldman, we look at the issues and challenges confronting the Court at a time when legislation and the law are subject to unusually heightened political passions.
Follow us on Facebook: / 92ndstreety
Twitter: / 92y
Tumblr: / 92y
Instagram: / 92ndstreety
92Y.org: 92Y.org

[@kylefontenot5937]

Interviewer was a little rude but Justice Breyer is such an intellectual at heart. He has a passion for knowledge and even if you disagree with how his jurisprudencial philosophy was, I think he is sincere and so passionate, like Scalia whom I disagreed with so much but he was firm in his beliefs

[@LaArtsGuy]

This is what real plurality looks like in judicial review it’s a hot repartee… every period and every coma fought for …every inch of the logic challenged and thought thru… this is a beautiful display of discourse between these two people.

[@Sarah-vr7yh]

He and his Colleagues have a huge headache legally defending Their psychology.

[@Anthonyag42]

I am really fascinated by Breyer and his logic and just over all vibe.

[@kylefontenot5937]

I’m going to miss Justice Breyer but I think Justice Jackson will do great :)

[@andressoto493]

Definitely the best type of interview, gets the plant from the root

[@gme_to_the_moon-v1p]

Why did he try to interrupt Justice Breyer so much?

[@andressoto493]

So that he would provide concrete answers when he tried to deviate out of the true essence of the amazingly deep philosophical questions.

[@LaArtsGuy]

This is what real plurality looks like in judicial review it’s a hot repartee… every period and every coma fought for …every inch of the logic challenged and thought thru… this is a beautiful display of discourse between these two people.

[@gregorywells3227]

Noah Feldman is unnecessarily adversarial at times throughout this interview.

[@mitchellkramer9716]

That’s his interviewing style. He’s great.

[@julieb8668]

Pompous

[@josephdestaubin7426]

It is stupid disrespectful to even imagine that any of the 9 justices, who are after all technocrats at heart, can be dissuaded from doing what technocrats tend towards by something as relatively trite as their religious dispositions.

[@christopherperillo8037]

It seems like you worked really hard on this sentence. Unfortunately, its kind of crappy though.

[@josephdestaubin7426]

@@christopherperillo8037 Not really, I was a bit upset at the time by the implications being made.

[@kaozyk4839]

ERIC R BINFORD MR INNOVATOR UTUBE
I RESPECT THE LAWS
I RESPECT THE CONGRESS......

[@kaozyk4839]

ERIC R BINFORD MR INNOVATOR UTUBE
let me know
I never made report
On 7 years of
moving forward
BUT block BACK
from. LEADERSHIP
poor

[@iceyred6668]

jane college ii //nd.D

[@carmelitalanza9540]

ERIC R BINFORD MR INNOVATOR UTUBE
let me know
I never made report
On 7 years of
moving forward
BUT block BACK
from. LEADERSHIP
poor