I learned about DNA nucleotides and the genetic code embedded in the sequence of the four types of nucleotides waaay back in Catholic high school. Because belief in God was pre-supposed there, the connection between a code and a Designer was implicit. As a future bio major, now long ago completed, I never accepted that this was the result of a random process. It takes an inordinately larger to leap of faith to accept that fiction than it does to believe in God. Occam's Razor almost demands acceptance of the existence of a Designer in this entire process. So many of us can't see that, perhaps because we don't want to.
@@markl8679 The most complicated thing ever imagined is the idea that "nothing" made creation. And, in before "no, we say we don't know", you guys know the third law of motion and the law of conservation of energy. In before the "no atheist said that", yes, Dawkins, Hawking and his mate believes that.
It's nice to see another biologist here. I couldn't accept it either when I saw firsthand how ridiculously improbable, even considering the universe's age, it would be to create even one of these biomolecules.
@@wingchunkungfuwinsby an angry invisible man in the sky? Who is all powerful, says you have free choice, but knows what will happen, so there is no such thing as free choice, and still gives babies bone cancer. If there is a creator, then he is horrible, and nobody should trust that immoral being
I met a biochemistry professor who stole a base off one of Watson's and Crick's original metal DNA models and then actually got both Watson and Crick to sign it. He showed it to me when I was visiting the Graduate School he worked at.
My grandparents would have Watson and Crick over for Christmas parties. My grandfather did a bunch of research on viruses and part of his research got tossed over to W&C which lead to their discovery of the double helix. I have some of his old models of a DNA molecule that were made put of wood.
And he’s been proven to be a fraud. He get all the work from the woman researcher who had her own team. Go back and do your history figure out who she was. We just dumb down millions of people across the globe giving these guys credits and now it has been debunked that they stole the information they didn’t discover anything they were SCAMMERS thieves
Older educational systems didn't have this. People need to realize that our education is updated every decade, and is different for every country. The comments are basically gaslighting the older generation, even when they love learning. This is incredibly condescending.
My grandfather was a biochemist and the smartest man I personally knew. At his funeral after one my uncles told the preacher adamantly my grandfather was not religious, my grandfather's cousin walked up. He then told us how he remembered my grandfather progressing through college and through his doctorate. At one point when back home, he said my grandfather told him the more he learned through the sciences, he realized how truly amazing and spectacular God really is...
@@markrusso8546 You don't. Nobody who is truly close to God participates in religion. Religion is merely a commercial racket that attempts to package and sell faith in God. It is often assumed, erroneously, that those who are not involved with religion don't believe in God -- when in reality those who believe in God simply have no use for religion. Read in the Bible, Romans chapter 8, for a better understanding of how God deals directly with those who love him.
Your school may not have taught this, but mine did. I remember one of the best teachers we had saying "We have to teach you the basics that will allow you to grow as a person. So let's talk about one of the most basic things that enables life" His lesson was for 90 minutes. Felt like 5. Thank you Mr Goodwin.
Had a teacher just like this. Mr Lueck, 8th grade science. He made everything interesting and went above and beyond to make sure we all understood the basics of Bio and physics at the highest level.
My High school biology teacher showed me a letter he had from David Attenborough attacking him for asking questions that David clearly didn’t want to answer about evolution..(the evil solution!)
Mankind HAS known about this. But if we fully understand DNA, we would also understand that what we are given as medicine, doesn’t actually cure anything, and in most cases, cause WAY MORE problems, and we wouldn’t agree to pay for them. So there go all of the libraries and schools.
“What shocks me the most is how this existed for thousands of years before it was discovered” yeah that’s how discoveries work they existed before we discovered them
lol they didn’t exist for thousands of years. Billions more like it. Before humans were ever born/made/created/programmed into being/insert other potential.
Public schools don't teach that the code in DNA required a "MIND" and the impossibility of the code arising from natural, physical processes. Public schooling about the evolution of DNA boils down to, "Blow up a forest and the result is a fully built house."
Soon, there is going to be the rapture. It's when there will be trumpet sounds, and after the trumpet sounds, God will lift his people from here. Also, God said people should be living by the Bible. Amen, and God bless ❤* John 3:16 - "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him shall not perish but have eternal life". ❤
Dude that’s like me telling my family a few months ago “Hey did you know that Myth Busters guy was actually a prop maker for Hollywood??” 😂 they looked at me like “uh yeah that’s like his whole thing”
I know, right? That's something I dislike about these shorts, they just recycle information known by anyone who takes the time to learn it, and make it like new knowledge, especially without giving due credit. They teach this even in physiology and, of course, in biology.
The mainstream’s evolution theory is like saying Microsoft and all its software started with a big bang and then it self evolved as needed for the users. Life is brought to us by intelligent design.
Are, so you are suggesting that everything exists is too complicated to have not been "created", right? Surely then this "creator" has to be more complicated than its creation right? Then it stands to reason that is something complex requires a "creator", and if the creator is logically more complex than its creation, then logically this creator requires a creator. Cue infinite regression.
@@atheistangel007 And? The “who created God, then?,” question is tricky but doesn’t make the thoroughly improbable true-that all this wonderful and specific complexity sprang into being and then evolved so uniquely and specifically. Just human eyes, or any eyes for that matter, or the human family structure tells us that we have a Creator. Not to mention sacred geometry…
@doreenb.8928 Existence is not "thoughly improbable", it's just not understood by many, that then choose to stick their favorite god into the gaps of their knowledge rather than educate themselves, or just admit there are things they don't know. The eye is not evidence of any "creator", it is far too flawed.
I learned this in school, nucleotides are grouped into 3 nucleotide chunks called codons that are read and copied by molecules called DNA polymerases, it’s plural because there are few different ones that work together to read and copy DNA. That process is called transcription. The dna is copied into a single stranded RNA called specifically an mRNA or messenger RNA. That mRNA is moved outside the nucleus and read by ribosomes where it reads the mRNA by its codons (there are 64 possible codons) until it reaches one of 3 codons that terminate the sequence also known as stop codons. For each codon read an amino acid is bonded to a chain and the chain is complete when a stop codon is read. The chain of amino acids (also known as a polypeptide chain) is very literally a protein your body will use for one of an infinite number of uses. The 61 non-stop codons are translated into one of 20 amino acids. Making for a nearly infinite number of possible sequences. This process is called translation. If you’ve stuck around this long you’re probably interested in the topic, so I’ll give you some brain teasers that have scientists scratching their heads TODAY. 1.) the body doesn’t make proteins it doesn’t need or can’t use, dna mutations (unlike in x-men) are extremely common and happen constantly in your own body. This process causes aging. Changes to the code sound like they should make drastic changes to your entire body right? They don’t, they can, but 99.999% of mutations are ignored because the body doesn’t read mRNA as a straight code, before it is read by a ribosome it is edited to be an exact code for a protein the body needs. It’s another long science explanation that I’m not getting into but, no book or biologist can tell you how the body knows which codons need to be in what sequence to make the exact protein the body needs. It’s not a blind editing, it is done precisely, we don’t know precisely why though. 2.) the DNA polymerases that are the key, gas pedal, and engine of the transcription process I talked about? You remember them? They unzip, stabilize, read, and code DNA into mRNA. This process lets us make specialized proteins for structure and enzymes that allow us to live functional lives. No enzymes, no biological catalysts to make energy consumption efficient enough for advanced life to exist. All enzymes and proteins in your body are coded from your DNA. The crazy question that baffles scientists and makes believers out of atheists? All of the DNA polymerases are enzymes, hence the suffix -ase, your DNA codes the thing that makes it possible for your DNA to be coded and read. Your ribosomes? Also coded from DNA. The leading theory on how DNA and RNA was first created was by random chemical interactions in ancient brine pools with harsh conditions and boom randomly existing genetic coding that does nothing on its own except exist. Which came first, the DNA/RNA or the only thing that reads and codes DNA/RNA but is created from the DNA/RNA. You see? It’s the chicken vs the egg but for all life as we know it. One cannot explain its existence without the other already being there unless you really stretch all known biology to fit wild theories nobody will ever be able to prove. I gave up trying to find an answer, came to the conclusion that we were designed this way or at bare minimum DNA/RNA and the polymerases came with the design plan. I can’t say if it’s God or some alien warlord named xenon the inflatable scrotum. But I can’t look at a schematic for a washing machine without knowing some guy named Jeff designed it. At least Jeff was nice enough to sign the blueprints for trademark purposes. Then again maybe whatever designed us left its signature in the genome we haven’t fully deciphered.
Jeff did not design the washing machine. It was a long process involving many people. Very complex things can look like genius design but they are actually just problems being solved over a lot of time, where many factors eventually form into something useful. There was also no involvement of any God in the design of washing machines. Eggs existed long before any chickens. The main secret to creation, is time itself, plus matter.
God is the designer, and He did leave his divine signature. We just grow up in times that make people seem foolish for believing that He did. It's crazy
Dr Bruce Lipton wrote a great book called The Biology of Belief...on audiobook too and i may have seen it on yoitube...it is a great book discussing the importance of proteins & RNA in our functions as humans. He quit his prestigeous job as a cell biologist & tutor after discovering that RNA is more impactful than DNA & yet he was being forced to teach an untruth! When i saw new vaxs using mRNA I avoided like the plague & glad i did...they are messing with what they dont fully understand. Will add link if can...imo its worth listening to.
This is a good book...goes into RNA etc in an understandable way: th-cam.com/video/t53-XekulyQ/w-d-xo.htmlsi=HjxQsPs4oA0fZLol My last comment was deleted so im just putting the link...the guy is a cellular biologist..
@@sigmagic2874not even the most wild estimate doesn’t have humans walking around 3 billions years ago bud😂😂 lol the world isn’t 9000 years old but fuck there is a thing as being TOO liberal lmao. 2024
@@KushMyCologneee Just open your eyes and look around you at the creation - then ponder it. One example of millions: How many millions of years did it take for the human womb to evolve???? If it did, how come we are all here???? Evolutionary thinking is totally illogical and irrational. God has given you a mind to think and reason with. People who don't think and ponder these things are not very intelligent human beings. They have switched off the most incredible apparatus given to them by God and only living a fraction of their lives.
@@KushMyCologneee Obviously that's always been the great question. Where did God come from. From a rational, secular, perspective it's very hard to explain as we are conditioned to view evidence from empirical knowledge, quanta, DNA, evolution, explosions of what Carl Sagan use to say, ";star stuff". We as humans regardless of how far we have come on the intellectual circle. God is so far beyond our comprehension of how and why, that the best answer l can give is that there is knowledge way, way beyond the rational, logical answers if why and how which we as a species are just not there yet to have a deep understanding of things beyond a secular means. We still have yet to fully understand the essence of the space and time consortium ; in addition to anything that exists without the laws of what we know as physical reality. So l don't think none of us are fully capable in answering where the creator came from. Though faith may be rather difficult to defend it's all that many of us have and believe. So unfortunately because in the court of rational science faith loses, but for me it's an easy win, for l believe truly in my heat in what was witnessed by many in the scriptures, not to mention how regarding prophesy and from a historical perspective of what many historians, military, political and civilians wrote in many notes and journals that the creator exists. Besides I've personally experienced events in my life which as a result of my personal humility you wouldn't believe if l told you because rationality is not with me.
@@aaronmontgomery2055 because he said those things before and after the clip, more people interacted with it and spent more time on it. It ends up on more and more peoples feeds. Whether he knew this or not is another question.
@@aaronmontgomery2055 No youre not crazy, this is pretty common highschool bio info. What I'm saying is that last clip about "this has existed for thousands of years before mankind" or whatever leads me to think he literally only said those things to avoid copyright and drive engagement up. We are in a "reacting to bait clips" meta of youtube shorts.
@@shawnpaquette5835 Simply because the astounding complexity involved to make life work and the fact that its about science is because there had to be someone who set the rules. Some say science and religion don't mix but it was God who created science. Ironically there are many hundreds if not thousands of famous scientists who used inspiration from the Bible to investigate and discover what we know and take for granted today.
@@voxac30withstrat Is the fact that a phenomenon is complex really evidence of a designer? Isn't the complexity of the thing and our awe of it really telling us more about our own limitations rather than proving there's some designer here? I mean, your argument is basically the same rationale used historically in polytheistic religions - the weather is too big and unpredictable and complicated so it must be Zeus!
@@kitmateyawa7829 your whole statement hinges on relativistic perspectives. How complicated is "too" complicated? Too complicated for whom? Even if the answer is all of humanity, we can only say all of humanity up to today. What do you mean by random? Do you mean emergent, or do you mean that we don't understand or can't perceive the events and forces which affect the outcome? How is design shown? What even is design here? Does a spider "design" its webs? What's being designed? Life, humans, DNA?
@@hater2764just secular atheists who changes their stance every season it becomes unconvincing, now it’s multiverse cause “nothing” is really stupid apparently😂
@@marcjanverdelantar9605Almost no one believes there is nothing and almost no one ever has. That’s mostly just theist rhetoric to push a false dichotomy of “god or nothing”. The multiverse hypothesis also is derived from evidence, not speculation. When we assume a basic ground states of everything (the most nothing anything can ever be; what you’d call god or “nothing”) they imply a multiverse. This is because if there’s a natural mechanism that allows for a universe to form, why would it be limited to one? Wouldn’t the mechanism persist after one? Plus, the different “natural mechanisms” and states of “nothingness” (oftentimes nothingness in this context means no space/time or matter/energy but some general properties) we’ve mathematically tested have all implied multiverses. It’s not just some random thought someone conjured up one day, it’s derived from actual evidence, scientific theories, etc. Plus, this isn’t an atheist thing either. A multiverse could exist under a god too. As an atheist, I find myself drawn to this belief not due to atheism but physics - I am a physics major (big fan of rick and morty too, so I’m biased lol). Don’t be mistaken, though, science has no regard for anyone’s beliefs, and this isn’t just some baseless belief. As a secular atheist, stop pushing a divide. I don’t care if you think dna is proof of God’s design or not, nor if you think it proves a specific religion. Seriously, I don’t care what religion you follow, I won’t treat you differently. As a person of science, though, and someone concerned for the future of our species, I can’t tolerate science denial. DNA is not a mere few thousand years old, nor is the earth, solar system, or universe. The evidence doesn’t depend on atheism, and science is neutral on this topic. Regardless of if there is or isn’t a god, the evidence remains unbothered; accept the evidence and bend your faith around it, because even if your God exists and your religion is true, the evidence remains unaffected - aka maybe your interpretation is wrong. And lastly, atheism isn’t the same as anti-theism, and atheists are a very diverse group because they’re united by _only _*_ONE_* “belief”, *NOT* by a belief system - that “belief” being the disbelief or lack of belief in god(s), that is it, nothing more to it.
I went to a public high school in a rough neighborhood, and they did mention this code in DNA. (adenine (A), cytosine (C), guanine (G) and thymine (T) ). Now they didn’t go too much in detail, but what I’m trying to say is that if they went over this in my high school, they probably went over it in many other high schools, since consider my high school one of the poorest.
This is the first Turing machine. Watson and Crick - tremendous race to the double helix. Just starting to unravel that code - not just talking about the transcription to proteins. The ultimate enigma.
What he wants to say .. That he wants schools to teach conspiracy theories and Magical thinking that's all this is .. taking real information and distorting it to explain and/or imply a magical/conspiratorial ideia .
Yes, and all programmers knows that random never did anything complex, that generative models are mostly hard coded, that the law of large numbers and Bernoulli's trial shows that chance converges to an average and never goes to extremes. Any programmer would also know that if you make a syntax dictionary and use random to try to make a program at random, it would never do something complex.
@@sophiacristina generative models are mostly hardcoded!?! tell me you have no idea what you're talking about without telling me that you have no idea what you're talking about...
@@generichuman_ It is, you have random only to join objects together, the object itself and its data are hard coded. We can see in AI how ChatGPT have lot of prompts. That when GANs fail to do something, you have to write a specific code for it to stop failing. If you let generative models to run by itself, it only makes noise. That is why the best codes for such things are mostly filled with hard coded fix. An AI that explore a maze and collect items got stuck watching an animated screen because it was rewarding it, how they fixed that? Hard coded it... Another that was playing an Atari game had problem in memorizing the aspects of the level it wandered and which had resources for the AI to complete the game... How they fixed it? They hard coded the AI memorization procedure. Tell me you have no idea about what you are talking about without telling me you have no idea.
I don't know why people expect randomness at the center of an impossibly complex chemical reaction. Stuff builds out and emergence is a wild phenomenon.
The sad part is that this seems like relatively recently discovered information. However, there are entire documentaries on these facts that are now decades old.
Take it further A binds to T , C binds to G, and A U? What about mRNA , A binds to U, so if mRNA was used in the covid vaccine , what message was put in there 🤨
@@reesebonds8139 the message put in there is a blueprint for a replica of the so called spike protein which is on the outside layer of a coronavirus. When you’re jnfected with covid, or get vaccinated, this spike protein is recognized and remembered by you’re immune system to fend off future infections quickly.
You forgot about the part of the hypothesis that states that the "Code" of our genetics were in fact fashioned by an advanced civilization and sent to earth. The hypothesis is also called cosmic panspermia.
Oh yeah- and what school matters. I switched around a bit, I notice schools aren't 100% uniformed. I was told in one school I'd learn cursive in the next grade, then that came and was told we should have already been taught cursive.
I learned this in high school...in 1962. Why didn't you learn it? I came home from school one day, and a naval intelligence person asked me to pronounce RNA (in the long way). Which I did fluently. He was angry saying "They are not supposed to teach evolution in public schools." He threatened to cancel federal funding for our biology textbooks. Which they did.
Stephen Meyer is a liar and a fraud, with absolutely zero expertise in what he's talking about. DNA is so redundant, self-antagonistic, nonsense, and just plain poorly designed, that it is OBVIOUS TO LITERALLY THE ENTIRE BIOLOGICAL COMMMUNITY that it isn't designed. That's why we don't teach pseudoscience religious nonsense like this in school. We also observe DNA building new "codes" purely through evolution and mutation and NOT design. In fact, when scientist try to DESIGN computer code like AI, DNA, RNA, and protein sequences, the BEST method for doing so is RANDOM MUTATION and selection, aka evolution, NOT design. Evolution is SUPERIOR to design for the most complex codes. Stop these lies and educate yourself. @@devinfordale8386
Bio class (in secular schooling) DID NOT teach that a divine creator is responsible for the organization of DNA. They instead suggested that DNA somehow formed out of evolutionary chance.
This is such gaslighting the school system is blatant horseshit. Kids have graduated without taking the required classes and nothing happens. But right. Americans are learning a lot in school. If you're joking your ass of maybe.
Establishment supporter comments are SO dumb and SO everywhere that it is breaking what was my critically functioning brain. With medical pharmaslavery and forced attention on boringmaxxed topics alien to all children.
There's a book called In The Beginning Was Information, by Werner Gitt. It is amazing how these things are. As a medic, I am convinced that people who want to believe evolution do so because they want to. Not because it is reasonable, but because it is unreasonable
The idea that a medical professional would disbelieve the most fundamental theory of his profession is rather disturbing. Remind me not to get shot near you. Are you up on germ theory, or do you still try to cast the demons into pigs when someone gets sick? What's next, physicists who don't believe in atoms?
I’ve heard that if genes, or DNA or chromosomes or something are assigned a musical value & then they’re played, all strands will reveal actual music and not just a bunch of random sounds, that’s incredible.
It's not incredible. It's just people overlaying our own frame of reference onto something natural. I've heard the "music" that DNA creates. It's a mess. Same with the "coding" analogy, or describing mitochondria as a "power plant," or our brain as a "computer" etc. They're just analogies and metaphors that christians confuse for being literal. Kind of like how they interpret the bible.
@@scottk1525 curious as your argument on how coding isn’t a good analogy for DNA? When we talk about creation of protein from mRNA, it’s a coded strand with a start codon, localization sequence, functional components, guanine caps and poly A tails, editing, splicing, rearrangements (in certain viruses and bacteria), etc. If it wasn’t coded by DNA, it wouldn’t be able to be read by a ribosome (also coded for by rRNA) which is assembled also by localization sites that are created and form into the most favorable free energy form (based on the rRNA that encodes those). DNA is also able to be edited, spliced, sliced, split, shifted, mutated, repaired, etc like a normal computer code would be as well. They’re called analogies because they are analogues (similar ideas that don’t share the same origin but are close in structure or function). So these analogies are good because they help relate similar topics together. I’d like to hear your thoughts on the mitochondria and brain analogies if you want to discuss those. I’m a Christian and have always believed. I don’t believe a purine was spontaneously created and formed and placed together in some place (even ignoring prokaryotic origin theory’s sulfurous vents claim or the lightning in a bottle claim). Let alone multiple purines somehow being made simultaneously to the point of encoding a functional piece of DNA that was able to code for a functional protein (without a ribosome), that was capable of coding for a ribosome, that was able to read that DNA to mRNA and not destroy that DNA piece to create a membrane and be bound and be consumed…. I’ll respond more if you’re interested but I would like to say before you retort and say “you’re just a Christian and silly” or whatever that you’re intelligent and your opinion matters as well. My message above was mostly to point out what I saw as a fallacy from my viewpoint. Most of us Christians shouldn’t throw the book at you and make you feel like we are condemning you for believing this or that. We all fall short the glory of God. We want you to be saved. A life spent not knowing God results in an eternity of pain and suffering. He’ll be waiting for you. Psalms 27:13
This is true. Dr. Ohno was one scientist involved in the DNA and music coding research. It was in the news way back in the late 1980’s, if I remember it correctly.
You weren’t taught enough of the mechanism behind it to realize life didn’t appear on life spontaneously. It is the product of intelligent design. Understanding the use of two distinct parts: DNA (encoded instructions for assembling an organism) and ribosomes (the decoder and assembler). They are like a 3D model and 3D printer. DNA cannot create cells on their own, and ribosomes do not assemble organisms without instructions. Both are required. And since ribosomes can’t build parts unless the parts are described in DNA, the DNA must hold the instructions for building ribosomes as well as the other cell parts. How did those instructions get encoded in the DNA? How also did the ribosome and DNA come upon the same encoding alphabet to convey these instructions if these molecules were the product of random processes?
@@_Huperniketes_ Google about abiogenesis, RNA world theory etc. It is not a result of random processes, there is a growing field of study how it came to be. The issue is not resolved yet, however we discovered some mechanisms that could result in life-like systems. Intelligent design is not a science, it is religious dogmatic point of view without a shred of evidence in support of it, a simple God of the gaps.
Everyone saying :"We did learn this in school" : He's talking about the end where he says the only conclusion is there is a mind behind the design. You most certainly were NOT taught that, you were taught it's the result of random mutation in a meaningless universe.
@@PLF... outside of the god bs and it being exactly or even close to a computer language, it is right. It’s just basic things like acgt. Stuff you learn in middle school science.
@@aaronmontgomery2055 we can leave God out of you want. There is still a universal code that exists. We have cracked A,G,T,C. But that's only our interpretation. It may go deeper it may be a completely different language we haven't understood yet. Like other symbols ☪️✡️♾️🕉️⚛️🪯 . We just don't know, our comprehension is only a glimpse.
@@fedup745 yeah that's what I mean. That's the human experience as it is, present the information and it will be processed. As far as faith goes that's the only way to truly find it anyways, come to it freely. Anything else would be false, whether that belief were true or not.
@@dw4270 perhaps it's a generational and even regional thing. But technically there is the whole church and state separation, which was my initial point.
♦"Religion began when the first scoundrel met the first fool." ♦"Only fools revere the supernatural myths just bc a book claims itself to be the holy truth." ♦"The delusional religious fools are cocksure and the intelligent full of doubt." ♦"The religious believe by the millions what only lunatics could believe on their own." ♦"It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled." ♦"It's difficult to free fools from the chains they revere."
❤❤❤❤❤❤ What a rare comment. I would add. Religions are great for politicians as they mold young minds to dual thinking and create very poor sensors for BS when they are adults. That's why politicians suport them so much despite not believing in any gods apart from themselves.
It’s interesting how people act like school curriculum don’t change over time, just cuz you learned something back in the day don’t mean it’s still being taught today.
They did teach you that in school, and it’s not quite so mysterious as you might think. The “code” represents sequences of amino acids that create proteins, and the shapes of the amino acids are what determine the shape (and therefore function) of the protein. And they don’t need to be optimal. They just need to be good enough to get their job done
“Good enough to get the job done” is functionally impossible to achieve via random unguided mutations. That’s the point. For every functional sequence there are trillions of non-functional possibilities. Therefore random mutation is not a sufficient to explain thousands and thousands of functioning proteins.
@@AndrewJosephKeithIt is possible. Your argument is one made from incredulity, which are very hard to counter only because there is SO much advanced science that goes into the study of abiogenesis that it can’t be explained to people easily. If you truly wish to become more educated on this subject, I implore you to look at research papers about the natural origin of DNA structure and integral proteins by “random chance” (it isn’t random, but again, too much explanation for a single youtube comment). I really hope you will do this and I advise you to keep an open mind.
@@AndrewJosephKeithWhy so incurious? How this might have occurred is a fascinating subject. “God did it!” is utterly unsatisfying as an answer. This God of the gaps in scientific knowledge has had his remit shrink consistently throughout history as more things are discovered.
@@AndrewJosephKeith Is that a reference to mitochondrial E coli of the electron transport chain in proceriotic cells , Or the secondary structure of B sheets in general ?
Hmm ok. But why do bananas and humans share 50% DNA? Cats 90%, dogs 80%, elephants 65%, chimps 98.5%? If we were “engineered” this wouldn’t be the case. If we evolved over time from common ancestors, this would be the case. ( which it is)
Or maybe God didn't want to "reinvent the wheel." Taking good basic characters and building on them for more complex or different organisms would be most efficient.
@MimifromChicago efficiency clearly isn't God's MO if the universe is indeed his creation with the intent for it to produce humans 13.8 billion years after starting the creation process using a Rube Goldberg style of stellar development.
you can have many different looking structures and use the same materials. a cell is a cell and atom an atom. living creatures should have a lot of like parts to exist . read John, Acts, Romans, us the king james bible and let your heat be still. take care.
Why do 90% of steel bridges share the same girder systems? Obviously they were not engineered. What a crock of simplistic drivel. Start with insitu protein folding, move on to circular homeostatic enzymatic processes, dive into epigenetic variac feedback loops. Come back and tell me how obvious it all is. It would realistically take a billion times the life of our universe for one circular homeostatic mechanism to occur by chance. That's not including the production of the ovum progenitor or the limits added by degrees of freedom. I cannot stand the blather of people who expostulate like a Postdoc fellow with the finesse and understanding of a preschooler. Get the math and probability down at least.
"Why did we not learn this in school?" Dude, I learned this in elementary school biology class, then again in high school biology class, and again in university in biomedical engineering course.
I learned this on 1997 in biology! We even learned how to find the defect in the code. I can't remember anymore the order/pattern, but it definitely held my attention.
I actually learned this in a liberal college 😮 but I wasn’t taught it on purpose. God intervened that quarter. I was turning atheist (remember I said liberal college) and questioning everything. One quarter my advisor put me in a human anatomy class and a Philosophy class. I’d go to anatomy and my mind would be blown, I was coming to my own conclusion that there is no way the human body evolved to it’s perfection by accident or even come to existence by accident. Then learning the genome project. 🤯🤯🤯Then go to my philosophy class where turns out the professor was a devout catholic and taught his class as a theology class. It was such an amazing experience seeing how God worked hard on me that year. Thank you Lord for not forgetting about me and forgiving me. ❤️✝️🙏🏽❤️✝️🙏🏽
Great story, but I'm amazed a Catholic Professor was even allowed to teach in a liberal college since many liberal colleges are trying to stamp out religion of any type.
@@babysquirrelxxoo8136 It's not cynicism. That's what science is, discovering how things work. Some of those things worked for over 13 billion years before we even existed.
@@jmrm01 Proverbs 25:2 - "It is the glory of God to conceal a matter and the glory of kings to search it out." It is the glory of God to conceal a matter: There are many mysteries in the universe, both material and spiritual. There are many things God has concealed. It is one of God’s ways to say, “You are amazed by what you see; yet what you don’t see, what I have concealed, is even greater.” The glory of kings is to search out a matter: It is the glory of great men (kings) to search out what God has concealed. This speaks to our pursuit of God’s mysteries in the spiritual world, but perhaps even more so to God’s mysteries in the material world. When men and women seek out scientific knowledge, trying to understand the mystery and brilliance of what God has concealed in His creation, they express an aspect of the glory of humanity, even the glory of kings. Therefore, we say to the scientist, search on, and do so with all your strength. In all their searching, the scientist should still keep this humble remembrance: It is the glory of God to conceal a matter. “What I see amazes me, but God has concealed even greater treasures of knowledge and wisdom in His creation (Romans 1:19-20). I must not arrogantly think that I can figure it all out.” As G. Campbell Morgan wrote, “That is the principle of all the triumphs of scientific investigations; and it is the deepest secret of all advance in spiritual strength.” - Enduring Word Bible Commentary Proverbs 25 enduringword.com/bible-commentary/proverbs-25
In electronics, there are two ways to store and present information, analog and digital. Analog means the information is stored and presented in a form where the amplitude or frequency of the voltage defines the content of the information. Vinyl records and tape recorders use analog methods of storing data. Digital means it is not the size or color that defines a piece of information, but rather, the shape. For example, the letter A could be any color and any size, but would always be an A. It depends where the letter A is located in a word and sentence that gives it meaning. Thus, words and sentences are also digital in nature because it's the character itself that makes up the information, not the size or color of the character. The DNA code is just like that.
@bobblacka918 Personally I am one of those that miss the warmth in the analog rendering, what sound is concerned, esp. in recording acoustic instruments. Besides, modern digitalization and data development involves more than just recording sound. If you scroll a few posts upward you might find a series of comments that dealt with A.I. and coding. However, have you ever given a thought to whether it will ever be possible to digitalize a smell or a taste? 🤔
So DNA is technically a digital storage medium. That's awesome. The thing I really want to know is how the physical body interacts with the spirit/soul and vice versa. Is there a "spiritual DNA” of some kind, and how does it affect the physical.
@@thecraftmunk1640There is no point in talking about something that is not physical. The soul may have something to do with consciousness. But if this is true, it does not seem that we will know because consciousness is not a physical thing
The scary part is that this usually applies to someone who doesn't realise it. Even those who smugly place denigrating comments like "The internet is full of idiots..." I bet you wear a fedora
@@Cybeonix Technically it is an information - depends on how you define it. For instance tree trunk growth rings are information too - it gives you the age of the tree, yet we know they occur naturally.
The fact that the OP learned this from Stephen Meyer, a creationist pseudo-scientist, says a lot about his education level. In Greece, we learned this in 10th grade biology.
It has long been my assertion that the day we descovered DNA was the day Darwin's theory became irrelevant. The true sadness is the lack of honesty in Scientific circles to acknowledge this.
I was an atheist my whole life. It was thanks to Chemistry, Biology, Biochemistry, and Genetics that I realized there was a "creator" or a "designer". I didn't call him any name nor attached it to any religion (that was my mistake). It was until +10 years later that Jesus Christ appeared to my life and everything made sense.
That’s not true either though. Franklin was responsible (along with Maurice Wilkins (I may have the name wrong)) with taking x-rays of dna, which were used by Watson and Crick to help develop their model. The extent to which it was stolen is also of some debate, since the work used was shared with Watson and Crick by people on the research team, and some of it had been presented. Franklin had died by the time a Nobel was on offer, so was ineligible, but if she hadn’t she might have had a share.
@@obansrinathan All true but they never acknowledged her contribution "Such acknowledgement as they gave her was very muted and always coupled with the name of Wilkins" By January 1953, Franklin had reconciled her conflicting data, concluding that both DNA forms had two helices, and had started to write a series of three draft manuscripts, two of which included a double helical DNA backbone" her work was instrumental in determining the structure. "Franklin pointed out that the progressive solubility of DNA crystals in water meant that the strongly hydrophilic phosphate groups were likely to be on the outside of the structure; while the experimental failure to titrate the CO- and NH2 groups of the bases meant that these were more likely to be inaccessible in the interior of the structure. This initial setback led Watson and Crick to focus on other topics for most of the next year." She contributed as much to the discovery of DNA as Watson and Crick and her insights were not restricted to her work with X-ray crystallography.
@@obansrinathan incorrect on several fronts because Watson & Crick claimed that they came to those results _purely_ through modelling, which was a lie. Also it was poor science. They did this as to not share the credit even though her work in X-ray crystallography was crucial. I'm not even sure if their access to her data was entirely above board. They did confer with her too. Also, either Watson or Crick (I forget which) suffered a crisis of conscience over this dishonesty. All this has come out you can't forgive these guys for it. Another woman robbed of her rightful recognition for her contribution to science.
Says you. Your billions of years, very well may have been maybe 10s of thousands of years. More and more scientists are coming to the fact that there was, and IS and will also be the creator. God was taken out of the schools and look at the mess of things today. It is truly sickening.
I may not have learned that specific thing in school, but I did learn it; by teaching myself. By reading, and watching educational videos, and using logic to put two and two together.
We learned this in Biochemistry in med school 55 years ago but in a public school, the professor did not lead us back to the Grand Design. It did occur later intuitively as we learned more about the intricacies of our body processes in Biochem, Physiology, Pharmacology and Pathology.
Is it just me or are these comments insane. It's like they see one letter "codes" and their mind just jumps to intelligent design. It takes five seconds to Google it
In nursing school I came to realize that the human body is not a mistake. Humans didn't come from monkeys either. We didn't crawl from the ocean either. We are a unique creature unlike any other. Human beings are like a finely tuned machine made of flesh & bones. Something or someone created the awesomeness that we are.
Every species is a finely tuned machine made of flesh & bones. It is correct that humans didn't come from monkeys per say but the relation to other species is well documented now. The closest living relatives to homo sapiens (humans) are the Pan troglodytes (chimpanzees) and Pan paniscus (bonobo). We share almost the same DNA, skeletal structure, muscular structure, cardiovascular system, etc... All Three species play games, have emotions, think, reflect on ourselves and our thoughts, share a similar morality, wage wars, make friends, comfort each other, have personalities, moods, etc... Each species has pros and cons relative to one another based on environmental factors. For example, chimpanzees and bonobos are better climbers than us as they rely on it for food and safety. 5-year-old chimpanzees even outperform adult humans when it comes to memory! If you disagree with science just know that you have a monumental task ahead of yourself if you want to prove it. You would need to overturn entire fields of science which have thousands upon thousands of studies, physical examples, tests, predictions etc... The relation between species is well-known and is far from a belief or hypothesis. Hope this helps.
That last sentence is key "whenever we find information, and we trace it back to its ultimate source, we always come to a mind, not to a material process". God is obviously the mind behind DNA. He is The Programmer. The Creator. Amazing. Just unreal.
DNA IS NOT A CODE the letters used in DNA are just abbreviations for chemicals. A stands for adenine. T stands for thymine. G stands for guanine. C stands for cytosine.
@SwordTune then tell me who or what created everything perfectly the first time...Once you tell me what you think did, tell me what created the thing you believe created all we know. And keep repeating the process it always comes back to a creator. Small minded people will stay on this hamster wheel we call societal thinking.
@@0ne239 created everything perfectly? you think the Babirusa is a perfect animal? the Babirusa has tusks that will grow back into its own skull and kill it. there is no "perfect creation" and there is no "God" how much of the bible do i need to prove to you is either factually wrong or inconsistent with an "all good God" before you will start thinking that maybe what the churches have been telling you is wrong.
ANother important point about DNA is that if both strings of the ladder go the same direction ie; like both going up or both sides going down the information terminates too quickly but in DNA point sides of the ladder of DNA go in the opposite directions one up one down so that the information can go on forever to make extremely complex information transport.
Very interesting information!! Established what was in the back of my mind from a very Young age, in a high school biology class this was illustrated and taught it did leave me with unanswered question until now! Thank you for this important information!! Much appreciated!!!
It makes sense that DNA found in this world is both complex and easily decodeable. It would be strange if it was simple and hard to decode. The same DNA clearly shows that all life on earth is related and part of a family tree created over vast time through natural processes.
@@ScaleCrawling There is no explanation for the appearance of the first cell or DNA. I don't know what you mean by a connected tree because there is no evidence of evolution in the fossil record
Sorry dude, but everything said here is part of the normal school curriculum for biology. Nucleotides and their discrete letter-like nature is literally one of the first things you learn in genetics.
Crick was also so blown away by this discovery that he figured this could not have been made by random chance, chemistry, and millions of years. So he decided that it must have been made by aliens. Yep. Crick was one of the original Ancient Aliens guys.
_Why did we not learn this in school about DNA?_ Brother, they been teaching this about Watson and Crick and DNA helix structure and the ATGC sequence in high schools since the ‘80s. 😂
High school, nope; learned this in 7th grade. Maybe curriculum is lacking nowadays. I think it is, too busy teaching equality and feelings, in science class!!
@@p_campbelloh yeah...school needs to be like the good ole days when HighSchool was not considered core education or publicly funded thus returning all Secondary education back into an option and privately funded... the original 4-year 'high"er education degree program. You know, like back when Home Economics and Domestic Sciences were taught not only in both primary and secondary schools but it was even available at universities because those unfortunate, undesirable, and definitely still single but well-to-do (wealthy) daughters required an appropriate major while attending college concentrated on finding husbands. Them those good ole days... when tans meant you were poor, and healthy larger women with birthing hips were the sought after wife because of her better odds of surviving pregnancy, surviving labor while also delivering a living & healthy child, and (if she's really lucky to recover from both) to have the responsibility for and obligation to raise their family.
@@sharonstrauss1146 you don't have to be interested in science to know what these things are. They teach it in school, you have to pass school to graduate. Dawg even the jocks should know this since they need passing grades to even play sports.
@@sulfuras1985 They see species of spiders and Scorpions in caves that were sealed for hundreds+ years and they're colorless and often blind or lacking eyes, we also see inferential things like species that are designed better for a specific environment thriving better and the less beneficial traits of other species causing them to die off or reduce in population. Furthermore go watch a video of a human sperm cell from sperm to fetus. That single cell become billions, and they differentiate into new and different cells all in days. If that, why wouldn't species have offspring with slight genetic variances (which we already observe) and the beneficial variances cause thriving, leading to more reproduction, increased proliferation. Humans can already alter the genetic makeup up animals to make them dramatically different, why do you think that DNA can't vary in nature, especially when you see the variances between similar and vastly different species already?
As fascinated as i was with all this stuff. I could never figure it out. Learning disabilities and what not I fell behind but i appreciate people like you that explain this shit
And some people still have the arrogance to think a book as complex as a DNA strand could be written at random, over bazaillions of years. Not to mention, multiple books, and also the uniqueness of each book is mind boggling miraculous.
I knew this and I flunked every class when I was in school because I didn't feel challenged enough. It bored me. I dropped out and just got my GED and learned a trade and worked.
What are you talking about. School doesn't teach you how to be a good employee. It quite literally does the opposite. Its the parents who teach their kids how to be a good worker for life in general. Not just as an employee, but as a human being. All life takes work. You get rid of capitalism you would still be required to do some type of work in order to survive. That or you would have to enslave people to do the work for you. Again to live requires work, no matter what
You're right. Unfortunately in some professional circles, if you're not brainwashed into full abandoned devotion to naturalistic darwinism and dare show a differing opinion, there's a good chance you'll be punished, and will definitely be ridiculed. You're wrong in supposing that the only things taught in school are directly applicable to the workforce. This is something that should be taught in gen eds as a basic principle.
Firstly, no, we were not taught this in school, because it is bs gobbledygook. Second, are you claiming that we should all be bad workers? Thirdly, what school did you go that taught you to be workers, good or bad? Funny how the ppl who disparage education as some kind of big conspiracy style thing are the ones who don’t really have a firm grasp on basic knowledge.
I learned this is a public high school, it is not a secret. It doesn't prove humans were created by design, at least not in the way this is implying, there are patterns in nature and the things around us on all different levels. Everything has an order, cause and effect, pattern etc; It only tends to be perceived as chaos because we either lack the knowledge or perspective to perceive these patterns.
I learned about DNA nucleotides and the genetic code embedded in the sequence of the four types of nucleotides waaay back in Catholic high school. Because belief in God was pre-supposed there, the connection between a code and a Designer was implicit. As a future bio major, now long ago completed, I never accepted that this was the result of a random process. It takes an inordinately larger to leap of faith to accept that fiction than it does to believe in God. Occam's Razor almost demands acceptance of the existence of a Designer in this entire process. So many of us can't see that, perhaps because we don't want to.
If you want to use Occam’s razor then you’d better leave out the most complicated thing ever imagined……….. ur god.
@@markl8679lol
@@markl8679 The most complicated thing ever imagined is the idea that "nothing" made creation.
And, in before "no, we say we don't know", you guys know the third law of motion and the law of conservation of energy.
In before the "no atheist said that", yes, Dawkins, Hawking and his mate believes that.
It's nice to see another biologist here. I couldn't accept it either when I saw firsthand how ridiculously improbable, even considering the universe's age, it would be to create even one of these biomolecules.
Absurd use of Occam’s razor.
Some of us DID learn this by paying attention in school while others were too busy mocking us for being nerds.
So ODIN made that? I knew it , we see in Valhalla.
@@user-hr8dx9qw4n great example of an idiot who didn’t pay attention in school😂😂😂😂
Or going to church.
You learned a bunch of lies. We are created.
@@wingchunkungfuwinsby an angry invisible man in the sky? Who is all powerful, says you have free choice, but knows what will happen, so there is no such thing as free choice, and still gives babies bone cancer. If there is a creator, then he is horrible, and nobody should trust that immoral being
I met Francis Crick. when I was a new grad. I got his autograph on my in my textbook, the same pic the video shows. It's a good memory.
A friend of mine had Jim Watson sign her textbook when she was a PhD student in the UK.
What an amazing memory to have! Wow. ❤
I met a biochemistry professor who stole a base off one of Watson's and Crick's original metal DNA models and then actually got both Watson and Crick to sign it. He showed it to me when I was visiting the Graduate School he worked at.
My grandparents would have Watson and Crick over for Christmas parties. My grandfather did a bunch of research on viruses and part of his research got tossed over to W&C which lead to their discovery of the double helix. I have some of his old models of a DNA molecule that were made put of wood.
And he’s been proven to be a fraud. He get all the work from the woman researcher who had her own team. Go back and do your history figure out who she was. We just dumb down millions of people across the globe giving these guys credits and now it has been debunked that they stole the information they didn’t discover anything they were SCAMMERS thieves
I learned that about DNA in high school. What is amazing to me is how bad the schools have become.
I’m in high school right now and I had a test on this exact material last week. Not all schools are bad these days 👍
Exactly! How primitive schools and educators have become.
Older educational systems didn't have this. People need to realize that our education is updated every decade, and is different for every country.
The comments are basically gaslighting the older generation, even when they love learning.
This is incredibly condescending.
Schools aren't bad bro the students now are crap, they don't give a damn and nothing motivates them to learn unless you reward them with some cash
Schools teach it today, its just that students pay attention less now
My grandfather was a biochemist and the smartest man I personally knew. At his funeral after one my uncles told the preacher adamantly my grandfather was not religious, my grandfather's cousin walked up. He then told us how he remembered my grandfather progressing through college and through his doctorate. At one point when back home, he said my grandfather told him the more he learned through the sciences, he realized how truly amazing and spectacular God really is...
Amen
Stories
The question is - why do you have to be religious (man made religion) to believe in God?
Hallelujah!!
@@markrusso8546 You don't. Nobody who is truly close to God participates in religion. Religion is merely a commercial racket that attempts to package and sell faith in God. It is often assumed, erroneously, that those who are not involved with religion don't believe in God -- when in reality those who believe in God simply have no use for religion. Read in the Bible, Romans chapter 8, for a better understanding of how God deals directly with those who love him.
Your school may not have taught this, but mine did. I remember one of the best teachers we had saying "We have to teach you the basics that will allow you to grow as a person. So let's talk about one of the most basic things that enables life" His lesson was for 90 minutes. Felt like 5. Thank you Mr Goodwin.
Had a teacher just like this.
Mr Lueck, 8th grade science.
He made everything interesting and went above and beyond to make sure we all understood the basics of Bio and physics at the highest level.
My High school biology teacher showed me a letter he had from David Attenborough attacking him for asking questions that David clearly didn’t want to answer about evolution..(the evil solution!)
Mankind HAS known about this. But if we fully understand DNA, we would also understand that what we are given as medicine, doesn’t actually cure anything, and in most cases, cause WAY MORE problems, and we wouldn’t agree to pay for them. So there go all of the libraries and schools.
Bars ✊🏿👏🏿🖖🏿
Which grade
Who didn’t learn DNA is encoded in school?
People who chose different subjects. My high school let us chose our subjects . I did maths and physics, not biology or chemistry.
@@contempt4u that's dumb. No kid should have that option. Kids should learn the 4 subjects
@sebassanchezc-1379 also did English, accounting and a computer class., only so much time in a day, can't do every subject available.
@sebassanchezc-1379 blame the Australian education system 35 years ago.
@@contempt4u weird, im 36 and in NZ we learned this early, way before science class splintered into different optional topics.
“What shocks me the most is how this existed for thousands of years before it was discovered” yeah that’s how discoveries work they existed before we discovered them
LOL Someone tell this guy that there's things we haven't discovered yet. It'll likely blow his mind.
lol they didn’t exist for thousands of years. Billions more like it. Before humans were ever born/made/created/programmed into being/insert other potential.
Also, "thousands of years"??? Whoa!!
Probably more like billions 😂@@Trollificusv2
He said THAT is what blows his mind the most... 🤦
You did learn this in school. You just weren't paying attention.
Public schools don't teach that the code in DNA required a "MIND" and the impossibility of the code arising from natural, physical processes.
Public schooling about the evolution of DNA boils down to, "Blow up a forest and the result is a fully built house."
I learned it in honors biology.
In high school.
That would explain why he sits there plagiarizing content for money
@@purpleking6678he also gets his mind blown thinking that DNA only existed for thousands of years.
They definitely taught this is high schools in Tanzania. In depth, too.
Soon, there is going to be the rapture. It's when there will be trumpet sounds, and after the trumpet sounds, God will lift his people from here. Also, God said people should be living by the Bible. Amen, and God bless
❤* John 3:16 - "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him shall not perish but have eternal life". ❤
They teach it everywhere. Kids just don’t pay attention.
@@allenvayner4987 hahahaha... imaginary world people are funny
@@notimportant3686 It seems that it’s about someone’s flooding attack and the songs that they sang.
I intend to teach it tomorrow in a village school in Nigeria tomorrow😜
It's always those who flunked school who stumble onto half an idea later and think they found something all the scientists missed.
And still get it wrong
Dude that’s like me telling my family a few months ago “Hey did you know that Myth Busters guy was actually a prop maker for Hollywood??” 😂 they looked at me like “uh yeah that’s like his whole thing”
Agree. I know someone who talks about ‘alternative theories’ who has not bothered to understand conventional wisdom
I know, right? That's something I dislike about these shorts, they just recycle information known by anyone who takes the time to learn it, and make it like new knowledge, especially without giving due credit. They teach this even in physiology and, of course, in biology.
Hey don't knock intuition, it saved my health and my life.
The mainstream’s evolution theory is like saying Microsoft and all its software started with a big bang and then it self evolved as needed for the users.
Life is brought to us by intelligent design.
Well stated!
Good analogy.
What a terrible analogy. Computer code does not self-replicate or mutate. Y'know, the two necessary cornerstones of any evolutionary process.
@@Ralyx0 If you aren't smart enough to understand the analogy, you're just proving his point.
No, it just means you have no idea what you are talking about.
Even the Catholic church accepts the fact of evolution.
I have never doubted a Creator. The complexities of nature and humans are amazing ❤
Are, so you are suggesting that everything exists is too complicated to have not been "created", right?
Surely then this "creator" has to be more complicated than its creation right?
Then it stands to reason that is something complex requires a "creator", and if the creator is logically more complex than its creation, then logically this creator requires a creator.
Cue infinite regression.
@@atheistangel007 why do you care if people believe in God?
@@atheistangel007 And?
The “who created God, then?,” question is tricky but doesn’t make the thoroughly improbable true-that all this wonderful and specific complexity sprang into being and then evolved so uniquely and specifically.
Just human eyes, or any eyes for that matter, or the human family structure tells us that we have a Creator.
Not to mention sacred geometry…
@@phi4721 Do you know what Project 2025 is?
@doreenb.8928 Existence is not "thoughly improbable", it's just not understood by many, that then choose to stick their favorite god into the gaps of their knowledge rather than educate themselves, or just admit there are things they don't know.
The eye is not evidence of any "creator", it is far too flawed.
I learned this in school, nucleotides are grouped into 3 nucleotide chunks called codons that are read and copied by molecules called DNA polymerases, it’s plural because there are few different ones that work together to read and copy DNA. That process is called transcription.
The dna is copied into a single stranded RNA called specifically an mRNA or messenger RNA. That mRNA is moved outside the nucleus and read by ribosomes where it reads the mRNA by its codons (there are 64 possible codons) until it reaches one of 3 codons that terminate the sequence also known as stop codons. For each codon read an amino acid is bonded to a chain and the chain is complete when a stop codon is read. The chain of amino acids (also known as a polypeptide chain) is very literally a protein your body will use for one of an infinite number of uses. The 61 non-stop codons are translated into one of 20 amino acids. Making for a nearly infinite number of possible sequences. This process is called translation.
If you’ve stuck around this long you’re probably interested in the topic, so I’ll give you some brain teasers that have scientists scratching their heads TODAY.
1.) the body doesn’t make proteins it doesn’t need or can’t use, dna mutations (unlike in x-men) are extremely common and happen constantly in your own body. This process causes aging. Changes to the code sound like they should make drastic changes to your entire body right? They don’t, they can, but 99.999% of mutations are ignored because the body doesn’t read mRNA as a straight code, before it is read by a ribosome it is edited to be an exact code for a protein the body needs. It’s another long science explanation that I’m not getting into but, no book or biologist can tell you how the body knows which codons need to be in what sequence to make the exact protein the body needs. It’s not a blind editing, it is done precisely, we don’t know precisely why though.
2.) the DNA polymerases that are the key, gas pedal, and engine of the transcription process I talked about? You remember them? They unzip, stabilize, read, and code DNA into mRNA. This process lets us make specialized proteins for structure and enzymes that allow us to live functional lives. No enzymes, no biological catalysts to make energy consumption efficient enough for advanced life to exist. All enzymes and proteins in your body are coded from your DNA. The crazy question that baffles scientists and makes believers out of atheists? All of the DNA polymerases are enzymes, hence the suffix -ase, your DNA codes the thing that makes it possible for your DNA to be coded and read. Your ribosomes? Also coded from DNA. The leading theory on how DNA and RNA was first created was by random chemical interactions in ancient brine pools with harsh conditions and boom randomly existing genetic coding that does nothing on its own except exist. Which came first, the DNA/RNA or the only thing that reads and codes DNA/RNA but is created from the DNA/RNA. You see? It’s the chicken vs the egg but for all life as we know it. One cannot explain its existence without the other already being there unless you really stretch all known biology to fit wild theories nobody will ever be able to prove. I gave up trying to find an answer, came to the conclusion that we were designed this way or at bare minimum DNA/RNA and the polymerases came with the design plan. I can’t say if it’s God or some alien warlord named xenon the inflatable scrotum. But I can’t look at a schematic for a washing machine without knowing some guy named Jeff designed it. At least Jeff was nice enough to sign the blueprints for trademark purposes. Then again maybe whatever designed us left its signature in the genome we haven’t fully deciphered.
Jeff did not design the washing machine. It was a long process involving many people.
Very complex things can look like genius design but they are actually just problems being solved over a lot of time, where many factors eventually form into something useful.
There was also no involvement of any God in the design of washing machines.
Eggs existed long before any chickens.
The main secret to creation, is time itself, plus matter.
God is the designer, and He did leave his divine signature. We just grow up in times that make people seem foolish for believing that He did.
It's crazy
I suggest you read the bible. There's codes in that too. :)
Dr Bruce Lipton wrote a great book called The Biology of Belief...on audiobook too and i may have seen it on yoitube...it is a great book discussing the importance of proteins & RNA in our functions as humans. He quit his prestigeous job as a cell biologist & tutor after discovering that RNA is more impactful than DNA & yet he was being forced to teach an untruth! When i saw new vaxs using mRNA I avoided like the plague & glad i did...they are messing with what they dont fully understand.
Will add link if can...imo its worth listening to.
This is a good book...goes into RNA etc in an understandable way:
th-cam.com/video/t53-XekulyQ/w-d-xo.htmlsi=HjxQsPs4oA0fZLol
My last comment was deleted so im just putting the link...the guy is a cellular biologist..
"Thousands of years..." LOL
Yes.
I was laughing about that too.
Hundreds of thousands if not more.
@@feellucky271 probably for 3 billion years
@@sigmagic2874not even the most wild estimate doesn’t have humans walking around 3 billions years ago bud😂😂 lol the world isn’t 9000 years old but fuck there is a thing as being TOO liberal lmao. 2024
Literally learned this in a public high school in biology
Even Watson and Quick admitted that DNA is not a random coincidence. Only a creator can mastermind this
Where is the evidence for the creator?
@@KushMyCologneee In your DNA codan...DNA = Do Not Alter,
RNA = Remain Not Altered
@@KushMyCologneee
Just open your eyes and look around you at the creation - then ponder it. One example of millions: How many millions of years did it take for the human womb to evolve???? If it did, how come we are all here???? Evolutionary thinking is totally illogical and irrational. God has given you a mind to think and reason with. People who don't think and ponder these things are not very intelligent human beings. They have switched off the most incredible apparatus given to them by God and only living a fraction of their lives.
Who made the creator then? Such an elaborate all-knowing mind couldn't have come about by accident, could it?.
@@KushMyCologneee Obviously that's always been the great question. Where did God come from. From a rational, secular, perspective it's very hard to explain as we are conditioned to view evidence from empirical knowledge, quanta, DNA, evolution, explosions of what Carl Sagan use to say, ";star stuff". We as humans regardless of how far we have come on the intellectual circle. God is so far beyond our comprehension of how and why, that the best answer l can give is that there is knowledge way, way beyond the rational, logical answers if why and how which we as a species are just not there yet to have a deep understanding of things beyond a secular means. We still have yet to fully understand the essence of the space and time consortium ; in addition to anything that exists without the laws of what we know as physical reality. So l don't think none of us are fully capable in answering where the creator came from. Though faith may be rather difficult to defend it's all that many of us have and believe. So unfortunately because in the court of rational science faith loses, but for me it's an easy win, for l believe truly in my heat in what was witnessed by many in the scriptures, not to mention how regarding prophesy and from a historical perspective of what many historians, military, political and civilians wrote in many notes and journals that the creator exists. Besides I've personally experienced events in my life which as a result of my personal humility you wouldn't believe if l told you because rationality is not with me.
I learned this in public high school science class in Australia. We did a week or so on genetics.
The letters we assign to the 'code' are A, T, G & C.
G CAT 4Me
That's what I was thinking, everyone's generic code is unique AFAIK, but widely known. They made a movie called GATTACA, whose plot centered on this.
GC (gonorrhea) TA (tits & ass) is the acronym I used to remember in nursing school. 😉
You forgot Uracil
@@triste4-21that’s RNA
Science teacher here: We do learn this in school lol
I remember this from middle school, am I crazy that this is supposed to be basic knowledge?
@@aaronmontgomery2055 because he said those things before and after the clip, more people interacted with it and spent more time on it. It ends up on more and more peoples feeds. Whether he knew this or not is another question.
@@glaive120 I don’t understand, did you comment on the wrong comment?
@@aaronmontgomery2055 No youre not crazy, this is pretty common highschool bio info. What I'm saying is that last clip about "this has existed for thousands of years before mankind" or whatever leads me to think he literally only said those things to avoid copyright and drive engagement up. We are in a "reacting to bait clips" meta of youtube shorts.
Another argument for proof of intelligent design. The designer is God.
How is it proof of anything?
I'm being 100% serious. What makes you give "God" credit?
Not trying to be mean. Legitimate question.
@@shawnpaquette5835 Simply because the astounding complexity involved to make life work and the fact that its about science is because there had to be someone who set the rules.
Some say science and religion don't mix but it was God who created science. Ironically there are many hundreds if not thousands of famous scientists who used inspiration from the Bible to investigate and discover what we know and take for granted today.
@@shawnpaquette5835 DNA is too complicated to be random but intricate enough to show design.
@@voxac30withstrat Is the fact that a phenomenon is complex really evidence of a designer? Isn't the complexity of the thing and our awe of it really telling us more about our own limitations rather than proving there's some designer here?
I mean, your argument is basically the same rationale used historically in polytheistic religions - the weather is too big and unpredictable and complicated so it must be Zeus!
@@kitmateyawa7829 your whole statement hinges on relativistic perspectives. How complicated is "too" complicated? Too complicated for whom? Even if the answer is all of humanity, we can only say all of humanity up to today.
What do you mean by random? Do you mean emergent, or do you mean that we don't understand or can't perceive the events and forces which affect the outcome?
How is design shown? What even is design here? Does a spider "design" its webs? What's being designed? Life, humans, DNA?
Gotta love how he slipped in a bit of nonsense with his last comment 😂
Americans..... 🙄
@@hater2764just secular atheists who changes their stance every season it becomes unconvincing, now it’s multiverse cause “nothing” is really stupid apparently😂
@@marcjanverdelantar9605Almost no one believes there is nothing and almost no one ever has. That’s mostly just theist rhetoric to push a false dichotomy of “god or nothing”.
The multiverse hypothesis also is derived from evidence, not speculation. When we assume a basic ground states of everything (the most nothing anything can ever be; what you’d call god or “nothing”) they imply a multiverse. This is because if there’s a natural mechanism that allows for a universe to form, why would it be limited to one? Wouldn’t the mechanism persist after one? Plus, the different “natural mechanisms” and states of “nothingness” (oftentimes nothingness in this context means no space/time or matter/energy but some general properties) we’ve mathematically tested have all implied multiverses. It’s not just some random thought someone conjured up one day, it’s derived from actual evidence, scientific theories, etc. Plus, this isn’t an atheist thing either. A multiverse could exist under a god too. As an atheist, I find myself drawn to this belief not due to atheism but physics - I am a physics major (big fan of rick and morty too, so I’m biased lol). Don’t be mistaken, though, science has no regard for anyone’s beliefs, and this isn’t just some baseless belief.
As a secular atheist, stop pushing a divide. I don’t care if you think dna is proof of God’s design or not, nor if you think it proves a specific religion. Seriously, I don’t care what religion you follow, I won’t treat you differently. As a person of science, though, and someone concerned for the future of our species, I can’t tolerate science denial. DNA is not a mere few thousand years old, nor is the earth, solar system, or universe. The evidence doesn’t depend on atheism, and science is neutral on this topic. Regardless of if there is or isn’t a god, the evidence remains unbothered; accept the evidence and bend your faith around it, because even if your God exists and your religion is true, the evidence remains unaffected - aka maybe your interpretation is wrong. And lastly, atheism isn’t the same as anti-theism, and atheists are a very diverse group because they’re united by _only _*_ONE_* “belief”, *NOT* by a belief system - that “belief” being the disbelief or lack of belief in god(s), that is it, nothing more to it.
Think it was intentional?
With the appeal to young earth creation?
I went to a public high school in a rough neighborhood, and they did mention this code in DNA. (adenine (A), cytosine (C), guanine (G) and thymine (T) ). Now they didn’t go too much in detail, but what I’m trying to say is that if they went over this in my high school, they probably went over it in many other high schools, since consider my high school one of the poorest.
This is the first Turing machine. Watson and Crick - tremendous race to the double helix. Just starting to unravel that code - not just talking about the transcription to proteins. The ultimate enigma.
Yeah me too, i remember that stuff from science, I think people are just f'n dumb.
What he wants to say .. That he wants schools to teach conspiracy theories and Magical thinking that's all this is .. taking real information and distorting it to explain and/or imply a magical/conspiratorial ideia .
They did lol
Went to a public high school in a good area and same story. We touched Gene sequences but did not go in depth
We did. You weren’t paying attention.
Exactly
Everyone thinks there are these secrets people are keeping, when in reality they were playing on their phones and dozing off during class. 😂
Did they mention that it being made from some big bang must be preposterous? Yes or no.
@user-kl2jg9ve3v we didn't have phones when I went to school and they never taught this in my school. I was paying attention 😒
At the end he says that DNA has been around for thousands of years lol wait until he hears about the dinosaurs
The more I learn about science the more I believe in the intelligence of the creator
There just no other way ahround it. We just didn't pop out of whatever some butthead says
@@LeonelLimon-nj7tu However, we *do* pop out of a place very close to a butthole. J/K
@@LeonelLimon-nj7tu No one in their right mind suggests that.
Then why do you think that neither science nor the evidence agree with you?
Which one of you had my reply deleted?
Francis Crick was one of the GREATEST minds of the modern era.
All programmers worldwide understand that codes are not the result of chance.
Unfortunately, it doesn't stop some of them from becoming atheists.
Yep
Yes, and all programmers knows that random never did anything complex, that generative models are mostly hard coded, that the law of large numbers and Bernoulli's trial shows that chance converges to an average and never goes to extremes.
Any programmer would also know that if you make a syntax dictionary and use random to try to make a program at random, it would never do something complex.
@@sophiacristina generative models are mostly hardcoded!?! tell me you have no idea what you're talking about without telling me that you have no idea what you're talking about...
@@generichuman_ It is, you have random only to join objects together, the object itself and its data are hard coded.
We can see in AI how ChatGPT have lot of prompts.
That when GANs fail to do something, you have to write a specific code for it to stop failing.
If you let generative models to run by itself, it only makes noise. That is why the best codes for such things are mostly filled with hard coded fix.
An AI that explore a maze and collect items got stuck watching an animated screen because it was rewarding it, how they fixed that? Hard coded it...
Another that was playing an Atari game had problem in memorizing the aspects of the level it wandered and which had resources for the AI to complete the game... How they fixed it? They hard coded the AI memorization procedure.
Tell me you have no idea about what you are talking about without telling me you have no idea.
Person who didn't pay attention in school: why didn't i learn this
Mine didn't even talk about it because they sucked ass lol
Regrets do always come after ignorance. 😔
Did you learn about the "Mind" behind DNA in high school that he is talking about?
@@thilinagamage2569 exactly , these people are so ignorant, since when did we start learning about god In school
@@iAmGh33zy correct!
I don't know why people expect randomness at the center of an impossibly complex chemical reaction. Stuff builds out and emergence is a wild phenomenon.
The sad part is that this seems like relatively recently discovered information. However, there are entire documentaries on these facts that are now decades old.
These four letters are:
Adenine (A)
Cytosine (C)
Guanine (G)
Thymine (T)
Take it further A binds to T , C binds to G, and A U? What about mRNA , A binds to U, so if mRNA was used in the covid vaccine , what message was put in there 🤨
@@reesebonds8139
An existence of an Alpha Helix, bound by secondary B sheets of amino acids to mitochondrial, E- coli
@@reesebonds8139 great question
@@reesebonds8139 the message put in there is a blueprint for a replica of the so called spike protein which is on the outside layer of a coronavirus. When you’re jnfected with covid, or get vaccinated, this spike protein is recognized and remembered by you’re immune system to fend off future infections quickly.
@@reesebonds8139 what the hell is "U"?
You forgot about the part of the hypothesis that states that the "Code" of our genetics were in fact fashioned by an advanced civilization and sent to earth. The hypothesis is also called cosmic panspermia.
I don't think panspermia requires life to be designed by aliens. Just that it's common enough to have come from off the planet.
If you're too busy listening to preachers instead of teachers then it's no surprise you think this isn't taught in schools.
We did. We definitely learned about this in school. Some of us were a bit distracted with hormones raging but this basic info was taught.
We learnt about this in Biology when we were 16. Just because you're an adult now and didn't pay attention it doesn't mean they didn't teach it.
He seems older, so could be a generation thing. What generation are you?
Oh yeah- and what school matters. I switched around a bit, I notice schools aren't 100% uniformed. I was told in one school I'd learn cursive in the next grade, then that came and was told we should have already been taught cursive.
No real school teaches this
@@PLF... I think- if I'm understanding what's being talked about
They do teach that there his patterns of chemicals.
You heard.
You didn't know..
I learned this in high school...in 1962. Why didn't you learn it?
I came home from school one day, and a naval intelligence person asked me to pronounce RNA (in the long way). Which I did fluently. He was angry saying "They are not supposed to teach evolution in public schools." He threatened to cancel federal funding for our biology textbooks. Which they did.
I graduated in 85 and never heard any of this
@@MarkNOTW Exactly. We need to get the federal government out of our schools.
The ancients already knew this. Modern education, oligarchs, politicians, social engineers, education, don't want people to know this kind of stuff.
They taught it in school...
Well you must’ve missed that whole year of biology class
How so?
Stephen Meyer is a liar and a fraud, with absolutely zero expertise in what he's talking about. DNA is so redundant, self-antagonistic, nonsense, and just plain poorly designed, that it is OBVIOUS TO LITERALLY THE ENTIRE BIOLOGICAL COMMMUNITY that it isn't designed.
That's why we don't teach pseudoscience religious nonsense like this in school.
We also observe DNA building new "codes" purely through evolution and mutation and NOT design. In fact, when scientist try to DESIGN computer code like AI, DNA, RNA, and protein sequences, the BEST method for doing so is RANDOM MUTATION and selection, aka evolution, NOT design. Evolution is SUPERIOR to design for the most complex codes.
Stop these lies and educate yourself. @@devinfordale8386
@@devinfordale8386> everything said in the video is wrong mate
@@PLF...Ok. I believe it now that you said that.
Bio class (in secular schooling) DID NOT teach that a divine creator is responsible for the organization of DNA. They instead suggested that DNA somehow formed out of evolutionary chance.
This is pretty basic biology you learn in school
This makes me pissed off that my school didn't teach it and I had to learn it on my own.
Did you learn about the "Mind" behind DNA in high school that he is talking about?
This is such gaslighting the school system is blatant horseshit. Kids have graduated without taking the required classes and nothing happens. But right. Americans are learning a lot in school. If you're joking your ass of maybe.
Establishment supporter comments are SO dumb and SO everywhere that it is breaking what was my critically functioning brain. With medical pharmaslavery and forced attention on boringmaxxed topics alien to all children.
Yea, you already had in your genes.
“We always come to a mind, not a material process..” that’s actually an incredible statement
The funny thing is, they present a material process, then conclude with saying "we never find a material process."
There's a book called In The Beginning Was Information, by Werner Gitt. It is amazing how these things are. As a medic, I am convinced that people who want to believe evolution do so because they want to. Not because it is reasonable, but because it is unreasonable
I might have to look for that book, thanks.
The idea that a medical professional would disbelieve the most fundamental theory of his profession is rather disturbing. Remind me not to get shot near you. Are you up on germ theory, or do you still try to cast the demons into pigs when someone gets sick?
What's next, physicists who don't believe in atoms?
I’ve heard that if genes, or DNA or chromosomes or something are assigned a musical value & then they’re played, all strands will reveal actual music and not just a bunch of random sounds, that’s incredible.
Anything can be music if you assign harmonic degrees to them
It's not incredible. It's just people overlaying our own frame of reference onto something natural. I've heard the "music" that DNA creates. It's a mess.
Same with the "coding" analogy, or describing mitochondria as a "power plant," or our brain as a "computer" etc. They're just analogies and metaphors that christians confuse for being literal. Kind of like how they interpret the bible.
@@scottk1525Huh? Yell us, please...how you bash Christians who read the Bible from "coding" and DNA molecules??? Whacked
@@scottk1525 curious as your argument on how coding isn’t a good analogy for DNA? When we talk about creation of protein from mRNA, it’s a coded strand with a start codon, localization sequence, functional components, guanine caps and poly A tails, editing, splicing, rearrangements (in certain viruses and bacteria), etc. If it wasn’t coded by DNA, it wouldn’t be able to be read by a ribosome (also coded for by rRNA) which is assembled also by localization sites that are created and form into the most favorable free energy form (based on the rRNA that encodes those). DNA is also able to be edited, spliced, sliced, split, shifted, mutated, repaired, etc like a normal computer code would be as well.
They’re called analogies because they are analogues (similar ideas that don’t share the same origin but are close in structure or function). So these analogies are good because they help relate similar topics together.
I’d like to hear your thoughts on the mitochondria and brain analogies if you want to discuss those.
I’m a Christian and have always believed. I don’t believe a purine was spontaneously created and formed and placed together in some place (even ignoring prokaryotic origin theory’s sulfurous vents claim or the lightning in a bottle claim). Let alone multiple purines somehow being made simultaneously to the point of encoding a functional piece of DNA that was able to code for a functional protein (without a ribosome), that was capable of coding for a ribosome, that was able to read that DNA to mRNA and not destroy that DNA piece to create a membrane and be bound and be consumed…. I’ll respond more if you’re interested but I would like to say before you retort and say “you’re just a Christian and silly” or whatever that you’re intelligent and your opinion matters as well. My message above was mostly to point out what I saw as a fallacy from my viewpoint.
Most of us Christians shouldn’t throw the book at you and make you feel like we are condemning you for believing this or that. We all fall short the glory of God. We want you to be saved. A life spent not knowing God results in an eternity of pain and suffering. He’ll be waiting for you. Psalms 27:13
This is true. Dr. Ohno was one scientist involved in the DNA and music coding research. It was in the news way back in the late 1980’s, if I remember it correctly.
Teacher: “DNA, aka: genetic code..”
Guy 20 years later: “why were we never taught DNA was a code?”
I think... he meant that it's not taught how this codes source is mind
@@onecalmpixel3297 yea, bacause it is not science, it is creationism a.k.a. religion. There is no place for religion in scientific classroom.
@@onecalmpixel3297 wanna try that again?
You weren’t taught enough of the mechanism behind it to realize life didn’t appear on life spontaneously. It is the product of intelligent design. Understanding the use of two distinct parts: DNA (encoded instructions for assembling an organism) and ribosomes (the decoder and assembler). They are like a 3D model and 3D printer. DNA cannot create cells on their own, and ribosomes do not assemble organisms without instructions. Both are required.
And since ribosomes can’t build parts unless the parts are described in DNA, the DNA must hold the instructions for building ribosomes as well as the other cell parts. How did those instructions get encoded in the DNA?
How also did the ribosome and DNA come upon the same encoding alphabet to convey these instructions if these molecules were the product of random processes?
@@_Huperniketes_ Google about abiogenesis, RNA world theory etc. It is not a result of random processes, there is a growing field of study how it came to be. The issue is not resolved yet, however we discovered some mechanisms that could result in life-like systems. Intelligent design is not a science, it is religious dogmatic point of view without a shred of evidence in support of it, a simple God of the gaps.
So we’re clear. The existence of a designer is proven. The existence of God is not.
Everyone saying :"We did learn this in school" :
He's talking about the end where he says the only conclusion is there is a mind behind the design. You most certainly were NOT taught that, you were taught it's the result of random mutation in a meaningless universe.
So apparently GW Bush's no child left behind act really ruined the US school system. I learned about this as a kid in school.
Or, the plan worked...
True. It was actually the No Child Gets Ahead Act.
@@macc4835 yeah no.. it didn't help.. not at all the system is far worse than it's ever been in most stated be it red or blue..
I was in a public high school in the US during No Child Left Behind, and I learned this in school.
Except the part of the mind which is bs.
1. They do teach this in high school. 2. This has existed for billions of years, not merely thousands.
They dont. None of whats in this video is correct.
Didn't know we had schools billions of years ago😅
@@PLF...oh, you have something other than DNA for reproduction? 🙄
@@PLF... outside of the god bs and it being exactly or even close to a computer language, it is right. It’s just basic things like acgt. Stuff you learn in middle school science.
@@aaronmontgomery2055 we can leave God out of you want. There is still a universal code that exists. We have cracked A,G,T,C. But that's only our interpretation. It may go deeper it may be a completely different language we haven't understood yet. Like other symbols ☪️✡️♾️🕉️⚛️🪯 . We just don't know, our comprehension is only a glimpse.
It was taught in school. And still is. It's just that kids don't give a shit and don't listen. We were the same when we were kids too.
You didnt learn it in school because you werent paying attention apparently
By the look of the comments, they where too busy reading the bible
@@bedestapleton2417 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@bedestapleton2417*they were
Even the Bible gets were and where correctly.
Oh I see. You were present in every other school in America simultaneously so I guess YOU are God. Congratulations
I came here to say this... like I'm pretty sure everyone learned about genetics in school.
They taught us this, they just didnt try to influence any of our beliefs with it.
God forbid we have our beliefs influenced truth. Sheeesh
Perhaps they left it up to students to put two and two together,
@@fedup745 yeah that's what I mean. That's the human experience as it is, present the information and it will be processed. As far as faith goes that's the only way to truly find it anyways, come to it freely. Anything else would be false, whether that belief were true or not.
My experience with school, most teachers were liberal and would go out of their way to make social political points on a daily basis.
@@dw4270 perhaps it's a generational and even regional thing. But technically there is the whole church and state separation, which was my initial point.
♦"Religion began when the first scoundrel met the first fool."
♦"Only fools revere the supernatural myths just bc a book claims itself to be the holy truth."
♦"The delusional religious fools are cocksure and the intelligent full of doubt."
♦"The religious believe by the millions what only lunatics could believe on their own."
♦"It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled."
♦"It's difficult to free fools from the chains they revere."
❤❤❤❤❤❤ What a rare comment.
I would add.
Religions are great for politicians as they mold young minds to dual thinking and create very poor sensors for BS when they are adults.
That's why politicians suport them so much despite not believing in any gods apart from themselves.
It’s interesting how people act like school curriculum don’t change over time, just cuz you learned something back in the day don’t mean it’s still being taught today.
They did teach you that in school, and it’s not quite so mysterious as you might think. The “code” represents sequences of amino acids that create proteins, and the shapes of the amino acids are what determine the shape (and therefore function) of the protein. And they don’t need to be optimal. They just need to be good enough to get their job done
.... and the *sequence of the amino acids...
Didn't know that they don't really need to be uptimal to function. Thanks and will investigate further.
“Good enough to get the job done” is functionally impossible to achieve via random unguided mutations. That’s the point. For every functional sequence there are trillions of non-functional possibilities. Therefore random mutation is not a sufficient to explain thousands and thousands of functioning proteins.
@@AndrewJosephKeithIt is possible. Your argument is one made from incredulity, which are very hard to counter only because there is SO much advanced science that goes into the study of abiogenesis that it can’t be explained to people easily. If you truly wish to become more educated on this subject, I implore you to look at research papers about the natural origin of DNA structure and integral proteins by “random chance” (it isn’t random, but again, too much explanation for a single youtube comment). I really hope you will do this and I advise you to keep an open mind.
@@AndrewJosephKeithWhy so incurious? How this might have occurred is a fascinating subject. “God did it!” is utterly unsatisfying as an answer. This God of the gaps in scientific knowledge has had his remit shrink consistently throughout history as more things are discovered.
@@AndrewJosephKeith
Is that a reference to mitochondrial E coli of the electron transport chain in proceriotic cells ,
Or the secondary structure of B sheets in general ?
Hmm ok. But why do bananas and humans share 50% DNA? Cats 90%, dogs 80%, elephants 65%, chimps 98.5%? If we were “engineered” this wouldn’t be the case. If we evolved over time from common ancestors, this would be the case. ( which it is)
Or maybe God didn't want to "reinvent the wheel." Taking good basic characters and building on them for more complex or different organisms would be most efficient.
Uh, same programmer? Same artist? Same writer? Same creator?
@MimifromChicago efficiency clearly isn't God's MO if the universe is indeed his creation with the intent for it to produce humans 13.8 billion years after starting the creation process using a Rube Goldberg style of stellar development.
you can have many different looking structures and use the same materials.
a cell is a cell and atom an atom. living
creatures should have a lot of like parts
to exist . read John, Acts, Romans, us the
king james bible and let your heat be still.
take care.
Why do 90% of steel bridges share the same girder systems? Obviously they were not engineered. What a crock of simplistic drivel. Start with insitu protein folding, move on to circular homeostatic enzymatic processes, dive into epigenetic variac feedback loops. Come back and tell me how obvious it all is. It would realistically take a billion times the life of our universe for one circular homeostatic mechanism to occur by chance. That's not including the production of the ovum progenitor or the limits added by degrees of freedom. I cannot stand the blather of people who expostulate like a Postdoc fellow with the finesse and understanding of a preschooler. Get the math and probability down at least.
"Why did we not learn this in school?" Dude, I learned this in elementary school biology class, then again in high school biology class, and again in university in biomedical engineering course.
I learned this on 1997 in biology! We even learned how to find the defect in the code. I can't remember anymore the order/pattern, but it definitely held my attention.
I actually learned this in a liberal college 😮 but I wasn’t taught it on purpose. God intervened that quarter. I was turning atheist (remember I said liberal college) and questioning everything. One quarter my advisor put me in a human anatomy class and a Philosophy class. I’d go to anatomy and my mind would be blown, I was coming to my own conclusion that there is no way the human body evolved to it’s perfection by accident or even come to existence by accident. Then learning the genome project. 🤯🤯🤯Then go to my philosophy class where turns out the professor was a devout catholic and taught his class as a theology class. It was such an amazing experience seeing how God worked hard on me that year. Thank you Lord for not forgetting about me and forgiving me. ❤️✝️🙏🏽❤️✝️🙏🏽
Love it!
Nice testimony by the way.
One just has to connect the wiring in the right way... ;-)
Great story, but I'm amazed a Catholic Professor was even allowed to teach in a liberal college since many liberal colleges are trying to stamp out religion of any type.
Not many are fortunate enough to be blessed this way.
@@shannaidoo130god chooses who to bless and who to torture...or something
Stuff existed before it was discovered by people. Incredible. What else blows your mind? Toast used to be bread?
Are you always this cynical? Sad.
@@babysquirrelxxoo8136 It's not cynicism. That's what science is, discovering how things work. Some of those things worked for over 13 billion years before we even existed.
@@jmrm01
Proverbs 25:2 - "It is the glory of God to conceal a matter and the glory of kings to search it out."
It is the glory of God to conceal a matter: There are many mysteries in the universe, both material and spiritual. There are many things God has concealed. It is one of God’s ways to say, “You are amazed by what you see; yet what you don’t see, what I have concealed, is even greater.”
The glory of kings is to search out a matter: It is the glory of great men (kings) to search out what God has concealed. This speaks to our pursuit of God’s mysteries in the spiritual world, but perhaps even more so to God’s mysteries in the material world. When men and women seek out scientific knowledge, trying to understand the mystery and brilliance of what God has concealed in His creation, they express an aspect of the glory of humanity, even the glory of kings. Therefore, we say to the scientist, search on, and do so with all your strength.
In all their searching, the scientist should still keep this humble remembrance: It is the glory of God to conceal a matter. “What I see amazes me, but God has concealed even greater treasures of knowledge and wisdom in His creation (Romans 1:19-20). I must not arrogantly think that I can figure it all out.” As G. Campbell Morgan wrote, “That is the principle of all the triumphs of scientific investigations; and it is the deepest secret of all advance in spiritual strength.”
- Enduring Word Bible Commentary Proverbs 25
enduringword.com/bible-commentary/proverbs-25
Computer code doesn't just appear out of thin air, why is it so hard to believe DNA code was created and therefore has a Creator
Because it became naturally like many things in nature.
@@Tnargav so you're saying that DNA code just assembled itself? 🤔 Lol ok
Just a reminder that Nobel prize genius Crick was under the influence of LSD when he made this incredible discovery.
In electronics, there are two ways to store and present information, analog and digital. Analog means the information is stored and presented in a form where the amplitude or frequency of the voltage defines the content of the information. Vinyl records and tape recorders use analog methods of storing data.
Digital means it is not the size or color that defines a piece of information, but rather, the shape. For example, the letter A could be any color and any size, but would always be an A. It depends where the letter A is located in a word and sentence that gives it meaning. Thus, words and sentences are also digital in nature because it's the character itself that makes up the information, not the size or color of the character. The DNA code is just like that.
@bobblacka918
Personally I am one of those that miss the warmth in the analog rendering, what sound is concerned, esp. in recording acoustic instruments.
Besides, modern digitalization and data development involves more than just recording sound. If you scroll a few posts upward you might find a series of comments that dealt with A.I. and coding.
However, have you ever given a thought to whether it will ever be possible to digitalize a smell or a taste? 🤔
So DNA is technically a digital storage medium. That's awesome. The thing I really want to know is how the physical body interacts with the spirit/soul and vice versa. Is there a "spiritual DNA” of some kind, and how does it affect the physical.
@@thecraftmunk1640There is no point in talking about something that is not physical. The soul may have something to do with consciousness. But if this is true, it does not seem that we will know because consciousness is not a physical thing
Hi
‘IN THE BEGINNING WAS THE WORD AND THE WORD WAS WITH GOD AND THE WORD WAS COD’ John 1:1
@@toosiyabrandt8676
Amen.
Not sure which school you went to, but CGAT nucleotides is definitely something we learned in school.
You learned it works like a digital code? Maybe back in your days there wasnt this thing called digital yet.
@@lauroneto3360american schools definitely teach this in high school, not sure why this is such a brain destroying concept for you people lmao
The internet is full of idiots....
The funny part is they think they're the smartest ones in room too.
The scary part is that this usually applies to someone who doesn't realise it.
Even those who smugly place denigrating comments like "The internet is full of idiots..."
I bet you wear a fedora
And cats, don't forget the cats.
A philosopher tells real scientists what DNA represents. If I want a tutorial on DNA, I'll ask a geneticist or a molecular biologist.
This was part of the California Education Curriculum when I went to school in the 60s and 70s.
DNA isn't a code. Code is what we use to explain it to each other. Have you ever heard the saying, "confusing the map for the place"?
Exactly 💯
My toughts exactly. Can't tell the menu from the meal.
I could possibly be code; what it is NOT is what this video claims. It's NOT INFORMATION
DNA explains what processes are to be done by organs and the organism as a whole
@@Cybeonix Technically it is an information - depends on how you define it. For instance tree trunk growth rings are information too - it gives you the age of the tree, yet we know they occur naturally.
Saul Goodman is now a biologist
Nice. I noticed that similarity years ago. But Stephen Meyer is not a biologist.
When I learned that DNA was a coded interactive blueprint that is used to construct every living organism, I gained faith in God
You don't learn it in school because it is several levels above what you need at that time
You weren’t listening that day. We most certainly learned that in school.
you dont
When?
@@duckfan12able 10th grade at my school.
There are articles suggesting that Cricks teachings be a part of school curriculum, but it is currently not.
Exactly bro was playing PS1 while this was told. AGTC were the bases if I remember correctly.
You didn't learn about this in school because you didn't freaking listen, Brandon!
The fact that the OP learned this from Stephen Meyer, a creationist pseudo-scientist, says a lot about his education level. In Greece, we learned this in 10th grade biology.
It has long been my assertion that the day we descovered DNA was the day Darwin's theory became irrelevant. The true sadness is the lack of honesty in Scientific circles to acknowledge this.
Love how the people who did not pay attention in school are now mad about what they did not learn.
You learned DNA was encoded by a mind in school? I sure didn't...
I was taught this in A LEVEL biology
Sounds like an American school
@@PLF... as an American, A level does not exist unless it’s apart of a private curriculum. Nice try
@@PLF... It's the English school system.
I was an atheist my whole life. It was thanks to Chemistry, Biology, Biochemistry, and Genetics that I realized there was a "creator" or a "designer". I didn't call him any name nor attached it to any religion (that was my mistake). It was until +10 years later that Jesus Christ appeared to my life and everything made sense.
“Indeed, the very hairs of your head are all numbered. Don’t be afraid; you are worth more than many sparrows.”
- Luke 12:7
The actual work was done by Rosalind Franklin. Watson and Crick stole the data and published the results without giving her credit.
Wow! That is awful but not unusual. This should be made into a documentary.
Thanks you I was looking for a comment about Rosalind.
That’s not true either though. Franklin was responsible (along with Maurice Wilkins (I may have the name wrong)) with taking x-rays of dna, which were used by Watson and Crick to help develop their model. The extent to which it was stolen is also of some debate, since the work used was shared with Watson and Crick by people on the research team, and some of it had been presented. Franklin had died by the time a Nobel was on offer, so was ineligible, but if she hadn’t she might have had a share.
@@obansrinathan All true but they never acknowledged her contribution "Such acknowledgement as they gave her was very muted and always coupled with the name of Wilkins" By January 1953, Franklin had reconciled her conflicting data, concluding that both DNA forms had two helices, and had started to write a series of three draft manuscripts, two of which included a double helical DNA backbone" her work was instrumental in determining the structure. "Franklin pointed out that the progressive solubility of DNA crystals in water meant that the strongly hydrophilic phosphate groups were likely to be on the outside of the structure; while the experimental failure to titrate the CO- and NH2 groups of the bases meant that these were more likely to be inaccessible in the interior of the structure. This initial setback led Watson and Crick to focus on other topics for most of the next year." She contributed as much to the discovery of DNA as Watson and Crick and her insights were not restricted to her work with X-ray crystallography.
@@obansrinathan incorrect on several fronts because Watson & Crick claimed that they came to those results _purely_ through modelling, which was a lie. Also it was poor science. They did this as to not share the credit even though her work in X-ray crystallography was crucial. I'm not even sure if their access to her data was entirely above board. They did confer with her too. Also, either Watson or Crick (I forget which) suffered a crisis of conscience over this dishonesty. All this has come out you can't forgive these guys for it. Another woman robbed of her rightful recognition for her contribution to science.
Hey genius, DNA existed for billions of years before humans discovered it.
Lol
Keeping it simple!!!! Lol
Says you. Your billions of years, very well may have been maybe 10s of thousands of years. More and more scientists are coming to the fact that there was, and IS and will also be the creator.
God was taken out of the schools and look at the mess of things today. It is truly sickening.
Why so cynical? Afraid you’re infrared world belief is wrong?
@@mikethemachinist1 If you think the United States made a mistake by separating religion from government and schools, you need to redo high school.
I may not have learned that specific thing in school, but I did learn it; by teaching myself.
By reading, and watching educational videos, and using logic to put two and two together.
"Thousands of years"
It's been a lot longer than that bro 😂
Since The creation of man
@@Erumyr *evolution of man
He just needed an excuse to put his face at the end so he’s not “stealing content”
@@branhub- I think he believes the world is thousands of years old 😮
Earth's 5000 years old bro. We were around for years without gravity then one day apple's started falling out of trees onto people's heads
We learned this in Biochemistry in med school 55 years ago but in a public school, the professor did not lead us back to the Grand Design. It did occur later intuitively as we learned more about the intricacies of our body processes in Biochem, Physiology, Pharmacology and Pathology.
Is it just me or are these comments insane. It's like they see one letter "codes" and their mind just jumps to intelligent design. It takes five seconds to Google it
Did you previously not believe in a higher power?
@@Chertseywarrior What higher power.
@@dfjprtime is the higher power not a god
@@ayushkadel1168 ah yes, thanks.
In nursing school I came to realize that the human body is not a mistake. Humans didn't come from monkeys either. We didn't crawl from the ocean either. We are a unique creature unlike any other. Human beings are like a finely tuned machine made of flesh & bones. Something or someone created the awesomeness that we are.
Every species is a finely tuned machine made of flesh & bones.
It is correct that humans didn't come from monkeys per say but the relation to other species is well documented now. The closest living relatives to homo sapiens (humans) are the Pan troglodytes (chimpanzees) and Pan paniscus (bonobo). We share almost the same DNA, skeletal structure, muscular structure, cardiovascular system, etc... All Three species play games, have emotions, think, reflect on ourselves and our thoughts, share a similar morality, wage wars, make friends, comfort each other, have personalities, moods, etc... Each species has pros and cons relative to one another based on environmental factors. For example, chimpanzees and bonobos are better climbers than us as they rely on it for food and safety. 5-year-old chimpanzees even outperform adult humans when it comes to memory!
If you disagree with science just know that you have a monumental task ahead of yourself if you want to prove it. You would need to overturn entire fields of science which have thousands upon thousands of studies, physical examples, tests, predictions etc...
The relation between species is well-known and is far from a belief or hypothesis. Hope this helps.
And this is exactly what I use as a first step in explaining why I’m convinced that Life didn’t exist by “accident” or “chance”
That last sentence is key "whenever we find information, and we trace it back to its ultimate source, we always come to a mind, not to a material process". God is obviously the mind behind DNA. He is The Programmer. The Creator. Amazing. Just unreal.
DNA IS NOT A CODE
the letters used in DNA are just abbreviations for chemicals.
A stands for adenine. T stands for thymine. G stands for guanine. C stands for cytosine.
God is unnecessary to explain any natural phenomenon.
@SwordTune then tell me who or what created everything perfectly the first time...Once you tell me what you think did, tell me what created the thing you believe created all we know. And keep repeating the process it always comes back to a creator. Small minded people will stay on this hamster wheel we call societal thinking.
We're defenitely created by something. We call it god, some called them " engineers "
@@0ne239 created everything perfectly? you think the Babirusa is a perfect animal? the Babirusa has tusks that will grow back into its own skull and kill it.
there is no "perfect creation" and there is no "God"
how much of the bible do i need to prove to you is either factually wrong or inconsistent with an "all good God" before you will start thinking that maybe what the churches have been telling you is wrong.
ANother important point about DNA is that if both strings of the ladder go the same direction ie; like both going up or both sides going down the information terminates too quickly but in DNA point sides of the ladder of DNA go in the opposite directions one up one down so that the information can go on forever to make extremely complex information transport.
Very interesting information!! Established what was in the back of my mind from a very Young age, in a high school biology class this was illustrated and taught it did leave me with unanswered question until now! Thank you for this important information!! Much appreciated!!!
It makes sense that DNA found in this world is both complex and easily decodeable. It would be strange if it was simple and hard to decode. The same DNA clearly shows that all life on earth is related and part of a family tree created over vast time through natural processes.
@@ScaleCrawling There is no explanation for the appearance of the first cell or DNA. I don't know what you mean by a connected tree because there is no evidence of evolution in the fossil record
How does that prove a god exists? This is silly 😂
@@MercenarySed What? do you know what is DNA
Sorry dude, but everything said here is part of the normal school curriculum for biology. Nucleotides and their discrete letter-like nature is literally one of the first things you learn in genetics.
Crick was also so blown away by this discovery that he figured this could not have been made by random chance, chemistry, and millions of years. So he decided that it must have been made by aliens. Yep. Crick was one of the original Ancient Aliens guys.
_Why did we not learn this in school about DNA?_
Brother, they been teaching this about Watson and Crick and DNA helix structure and the ATGC sequence in high schools since the ‘80s. 😂
High school, nope; learned this in 7th grade. Maybe curriculum is lacking nowadays. I think it is, too busy teaching equality and feelings, in science class!!
@@p_campbellDepends on the school. Was definitely taught it in 7th grade as well, but we are re taught it in highschool biology
Yes and we were labeled as Nerds or even looked down being interested in Sciences
@@p_campbelloh yeah...school needs to be like the good ole days when HighSchool was not considered core education or publicly funded thus returning all Secondary education back into an option and privately funded... the original 4-year 'high"er education degree program.
You know, like back when Home Economics and Domestic Sciences were taught not only in both primary and secondary schools but it was even available at universities because those unfortunate, undesirable, and definitely still single but well-to-do (wealthy) daughters required an appropriate major while attending college concentrated on finding husbands.
Them those good ole days... when tans meant you were poor, and healthy larger women with birthing hips were the sought after wife because of her better odds of surviving pregnancy, surviving labor while also delivering a living & healthy child, and (if she's really lucky to recover from both) to have the responsibility for and obligation to raise their family.
@@sharonstrauss1146 you don't have to be interested in science to know what these things are. They teach it in school, you have to pass school to graduate. Dawg even the jocks should know this since they need passing grades to even play sports.
“thousands of years” 😅😂
More like 4 billion years
I have the same reaction when I hear billions of years.
Show one proof of evolution. The entire world is waiting...
Thank you.
@@sulfuras1985 They see species of spiders and Scorpions in caves that were sealed for hundreds+ years and they're colorless and often blind or lacking eyes, we also see inferential things like species that are designed better for a specific environment thriving better and the less beneficial traits of other species causing them to die off or reduce in population. Furthermore go watch a video of a human sperm cell from sperm to fetus. That single cell become billions, and they differentiate into new and different cells all in days. If that, why wouldn't species have offspring with slight genetic variances (which we already observe) and the beneficial variances cause thriving, leading to more reproduction, increased proliferation. Humans can already alter the genetic makeup up animals to make them dramatically different, why do you think that DNA can't vary in nature, especially when you see the variances between similar and vastly different species already?
As fascinated as i was with all this stuff. I could never figure it out. Learning disabilities and what not I fell behind but i appreciate people like you that explain this shit
God is great!
Give him the glory!
- no thanks!!!
Hallelujah, thank you Jesus!!
Amen. Praise our great Christ.
God wins
@@AwakenTheEarth I know deep down you know there is a God. Why rebel?
I didn't know Crick was a WWII programmer. It's fitting for him to be one of the main discoverers.
Well he and Watson did the model the DNA shape was discovered by Rosalind Franklin with x rays
As far as I am aware he wasn't, he worked for the Navy and dealt with magnetic mines.
And some people still have the arrogance to think a book as complex as a DNA strand could be written at random, over bazaillions of years. Not to mention, multiple books, and also the uniqueness of each book is mind boggling miraculous.
For a thousand of time: correlation is not causation. That's need to be proven not guessed.
I knew this and I flunked every class when I was in school because I didn't feel challenged enough. It bored me. I dropped out and just got my GED and learned a trade and worked.
You know exactly why we didn’t learn this in school. Because it teaches you nothing about being a good employee.
What are you talking about. School doesn't teach you how to be a good employee. It quite literally does the opposite. Its the parents who teach their kids how to be a good worker for life in general. Not just as an employee, but as a human being. All life takes work. You get rid of capitalism you would still be required to do some type of work in order to survive. That or you would have to enslave people to do the work for you. Again to live requires work, no matter what
You're right. Unfortunately in some professional circles, if you're not brainwashed into full abandoned devotion to naturalistic darwinism and dare show a differing opinion, there's a good chance you'll be punished, and will definitely be ridiculed.
You're wrong in supposing that the only things taught in school are directly applicable to the workforce. This is something that should be taught in gen eds as a basic principle.
You just weren't paying attention or chose different courses.
Firstly, no, we were not taught this in school, because it is bs gobbledygook.
Second, are you claiming that we should all be bad workers?
Thirdly, what school did you go that taught you to be workers, good or bad?
Funny how the ppl who disparage education as some kind of big conspiracy style thing are the ones who don’t really have a firm grasp on basic knowledge.
Because this isn't real. Saying "a god did it" doesn't explain anything. Where would a god come from anyway? This is silly 😂
School isn't about learning. Learning is the cover for school's true purpose
As a retired biology teacher, I always taught students that the computer code comparison is just an analogy.
I learned this is a public high school, it is not a secret. It doesn't prove humans were created by design, at least not in the way this is implying, there are patterns in nature and the things around us on all different levels. Everything has an order, cause and effect, pattern etc; It only tends to be perceived as chaos because we either lack the knowledge or perspective to perceive these patterns.
We do learn this in school about DNA, high school, college, this is bio 101
Information theory and how it relates to both DNA, and origins is not Bio 101.
Def not the part after code breaker thing
Exactly. ACGT.
We never learned this in high school.
@@ronaldmorgan7632 About DNA? Was your school in the Deep South?