Systematic review session 3 - PRESS checklist, modular searches and endnote export
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ธ.ค. 2024
- Session 3 of the Systematic Review module by Dr Ian Kellar
Lecture given on 13/10/21
Videochapters
00:00:23 Last week's action points
00:01:37 Overview for the video
00:02:50 Explicit PICO (See PRISMA-S)
00:05:00 Munn et al typology of reviews
00:08:47 Example of PICO detail required
00:09:46 Adaptation of the Bramer et al approach for search development
00:14:15 Search logic, inc. Boolean
00:15:47 MeSH terms
00:20:37 Search operators
00:21:55 Worked examples of combining search elements for CENTRAL, Ovid Medline and Embase
00:30:37 The Horror!
00:31:06 Description on how to access Ovid at University of Leeds
00:32:06 Description of how to export from Ovid and
00:33:29 How to access and import into Endnote Web
00:34:16 Live example of me running search on Ovid Medline and exporting
00:38:29 Live example of me importing from Ovid Medline to Endnote Web
00:40:21 Live example of me running search on Cochrane CENTRAL and exporting
00:44:52 Live example of me importing from CENTRAL to Endnote Web
00:46:12 Discussion of sensitivity vs precision
00:49:08 PRISMA - S reporting guidelines for searches
00:49:26 MF DOOM quote relating to the importance of transparent reporting
00:54:08 PRESS checklist
01:00:55 Reminder of last week's action points
Link to MeSH video - • What is MeSH?
Link to Munn et al, 2018 - bmcmedresmetho... [typology paper]
Link to Bramer et al, 2018 - www.ncbi.nlm.n... [a systematic approach...]
Link to Reflefsen et al, 2021 - systematicrevi... [PRISMA-S]
Link to McGowan et al, 2016 - pubmed.ncbi.nl... [PRESS checklist]
OVID syntax guide - ospguides.ovid...
UBC truncation and wildcard guide - wiki.ubc.ca/Li...
Link to Madvillain: Accordion - • MF DOOM - Madvillain -...
Great to watch this again Ian to refresh my memory of it from October. I'm so glad all these lectures are on TH-cam. If I watch each one about 4 times, then I possibly might know what I am doing!
You are very welcome
I am doing my systematic review and the pico i have choosen is P (Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus) I (RESISTANCE TRAINING) C (X) O (Hba1c)
does it make sense?
Hi, great lecture! May I ask you something? I want to start a systematic review with this question "Does single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy safer and feasible than conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy?" and what type of review is suitable for this question? I am a little bit confused about it. I hope you will respond to this question. Thank you in advance!
Does single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy safer and feasible than conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy - so it sounds like your population is anyone eligible for single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy, your comparator is conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy, your outcome is what is confusing - because whilst I guess safety could be measured by something like in-hospital complications, emergency reoperations, unplanned 30-day readmissions, or 30-day mortality, feasibility is a tricky one in terms of surgical interventions - see this overview - www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6618315/ - because if the outcomes are qual, this course is only really touching the surface of qual synthesis, and is predicated on there being some quant data available. I know my uni (Leeds) and Sheffield run qual synthesis courses and deeper mixed methods courses. Good luck!