Organ donation is a topic that raises many ethical questions, as it involves the removal of organs from a deceased or living donor for transplantation to another individual in need. In the video "The Ethics of Organ Donation", experts from the University of Sussex explore the ethical considerations surrounding organ donation and transplantation. One of the primary ethical principles at play in organ donation is the principle of beneficence. This principle requires that we act in ways that promote the well-being of others. Organ donation is often seen as an act of generosity and altruism, as it can save the lives of individuals in need of a transplant. However, the question arises as to whether individuals have a duty to donate organs, or if organ donation should be purely voluntary. The principle of autonomy is also relevant to organ donation. This principle asserts that individuals have the right to make decisions about their own bodies and healthcare. In the case of organ donation, this means that individuals should have the right to decide whether they wish to donate their organs. However, some argue that the principle of beneficence may override the principle of autonomy in cases where organ donation can save lives. Another ethical consideration in organ donation is the issue of consent. For organ donation to be ethical, donors must give informed consent, meaning they fully understand the risks and benefits of the procedure. Consent is particularly important in cases where living donors are involved, as they may be asked to undergo surgery to remove an organ. The video explores the importance of informed consent and the measures in place to ensure that donors are fully informed before deciding about donation. The principle of justice is also relevant to organ donation. This principle requires that the benefits and burdens of healthcare be distributed fairly across society. In the case of organ transplantation, this means that organs should be allocated based on medical need, rather than other factors such as wealth or social status. The video discusses the various allocation systems in place to ensure that organs are distributed fairly, including the use of waiting lists and medical criteria for matching donors and recipients.Finally, the principle of non-maleficence is also relevant to organ donation. This principle requires that we avoid causing harm to others. In the case of organ donation, this means ensuring that the procedure is conducted safely and without causing harm to the donor or recipient. The video explores the various risks associated with organ donation and the measures in place to minimize these risks, including thorough medical evaluations and careful surgical procedures. In conclusion, the ethics of organ donation are complex and require careful consideration of multiple ethical principles. While organ donation can be seen as an act of generosity and altruism, it also raises important questions about autonomy, consent, justice, and non-maleficence. As we continue to grapple with the challenges of organ donation and transplantation, it is important to approach this issue with a thoughtful and nuanced understanding of the ethical considerations at stake.
I have a question regarding rejection. Would not doing a bone marrow transplant along with the donor organ, further help with fusing the donor organ to the new compatible recipient? therfore aid in preventing rejection of seid organ further along the line and less need for reliance on anti rejection drugs. Thankyou
As a poor person with the disease known as non-alcoholic cirrhosis, this is inhumane and a fundamental problem with taking another person’s body parts. I believe we instead should have put more funding and time and research into healing one’s own organs or into the vastly underfunded industry of artificial organs. We should be burying the people who are dead with respect.
Kitchen Conversation from 28th November 1984, by 'Billy' Eduard Albert Meier (BEAM) Question: What causes manifestations of mental fluidal forces and what do they contain? And what are mental fluidal forces and how do they work? And what about the body's own mental fluidal forces, for example when organs of one person are implanted into another? Answer: Unfortunately, at the present time and even at the end of the 20th century, terrestrial man has not yet reached the point where he is able to physically grasp, measure and explain the mental fluidal forces, and consequently there is still complete ignorance in this regard. This is also the case with regard to the transmission of the mental fluid forces to other humans, when transplants of other deceased or living people are implanted into them. Confusion is also caused by those elements that try to explain the whole thing from a religious or spiritualistic and esoteric point of view with nonsense, which contributes to the fact that everything is misunderstood and viewed from a perspective of delusional belief. Now, as far as organ transplantation is concerned, when an organ of one person is transplanted into another, it is not a harmless matter. Because the truth is this: The body's own mental fluidal forces or vibrations are so massive that they are very strongly deposited or stored in all organs. The mental fluidal forces or mental vibrations contain in their energies and powers everything that is generated by the mental block as well as by the personality and character. Therefore, it contains not only the energies and forces of thoughts and feelings, as well as of the psyche and consciousness, but also the hopes, desires, habits and idiosyncrasies etc. of the person, which are deposited in the body and all its organs. In the same way, however, this also happens in a neutral way when the mental fluid forces are deposited in rooms, places or objects, which can then be used again by the next personality after its birth. It follows that new personalities can then adopt and express the characteristics and behaviour etc. of their old personalities. However, this is not obligatory, because it is solely up to each individual personality whether or not it accepts or does not accept the neutral in the deposited mental vibrations and their energies and forces old peculiarities and behaviours through reconnections. What in further explanation concerns the transplantation of organs from one person to another, is that these are absolutely not harmless, as is unfortunately generally and specifically assumed by the medical profession. The truth is that the strongest deposits of mental vibrations with their energies and forces, i.e. the mental fluid forces, are primarily and extremely strongly deposited in the entire body and thus in its organs and skeleton. All mental fluidal forces are stored as solid and permanent information in all body cells. It should be noted that the information of the mental block is deposited in the body's organs and in the entire cell system within seconds, thus creating an 'organic memory' and a 'cellular memory', which then become effective in relation to the transfer of the stored mental cell information to another person when transplants are carried out or when a person has an organ implanted by another person. So if an organ or a bone is taken from a human being - alive or deceased - and transplanted to another, living human being, then this has unpleasant consequences. The fact is that the transplanted organ transmits its mental vibrations, energies, forces and information to the entire body and even to the brain and consciousness of the person to whom the bone or organ is implanted. And since the mental fluid vibrations of the transplant organ of the person from whom it was removed are also transferred to the organ-receiving person through the transplant, this means that peculiarities, wishes, hopes, fears and joys as well as behavioural patterns are also transferred. This can then be seen in the way that the person who has had a foreign organ implanted inevitably sooner or later adopts the idiosyncrasies and behaviour and even the mindset etc. of the person who was the organ donor or bone donor. Of course, not all organs and cells are equally powerful in storing mental information, so there are great differences. The strongest organ in terms of storing mental vibrations, energies, forces and information is the heart, followed by all other important organs of life. And since the mental information storage in the organs and cells takes place in a matter of seconds, it is also clear that even horror experiences etc. are still transmitted and stored in the event of sudden death, and consequently the impulses in this regard are transferred to the person receiving the transplant in the case of an organ transplant. Sudden death is therefore also stored as mental vibrations, energies and forces in the cells and organs, just like all other things that arise in mental form in the course of life.
Organ donation is a topic that raises many ethical questions, as it involves the removal of organs from a deceased or living donor for transplantation to another individual in need. In the video "The Ethics of Organ Donation", experts from the University of Sussex explore the ethical considerations surrounding organ donation and transplantation. One of the primary ethical principles at play in organ donation is the principle of beneficence. This principle requires that we act in ways that promote the well-being of others. Organ donation is often seen as an act of generosity and altruism, as it can save the lives of individuals in need of a transplant. However, the question arises as to whether individuals have a duty to donate organs, or if organ donation should be purely voluntary. The principle of autonomy is also relevant to organ donation. This principle asserts that individuals have the right to make decisions about their own bodies and healthcare. In the case of organ donation, this means that individuals should have the right to decide whether they wish to donate their organs. However, some argue that the principle of beneficence may override the principle of autonomy in cases where organ donation can save lives. Another ethical consideration in organ donation is the issue of consent. For organ donation to be ethical, donors must give informed consent, meaning they fully understand the risks and benefits of the procedure. Consent is particularly important in cases where living donors are involved, as they may be asked to undergo surgery to remove an organ. The video explores the importance of informed consent and the measures in place to ensure that donors are fully informed before deciding about donation. The principle of justice is also relevant to organ donation. This principle requires that the benefits and burdens of healthcare be distributed fairly across society. In the case of organ transplantation, this means that organs should be allocated based on medical need, rather than other factors such as wealth or social status. The video discusses the various allocation systems in place to ensure that organs are distributed fairly, including the use of waiting lists and medical criteria for matching donors and recipients.Finally, the principle of non-maleficence is also relevant to organ donation. This principle requires that we avoid causing harm to others. In the case of organ donation, this means ensuring that the procedure is conducted safely and without causing harm to the donor or recipient. The video explores the various risks associated with organ donation and the measures in place to minimize these risks, including thorough medical evaluations and careful surgical procedures. In conclusion, the ethics of organ donation are complex and require careful consideration of multiple ethical principles. While organ donation can be seen as an act of generosity and altruism, it also raises important questions about autonomy, consent, justice, and non-maleficence. As we continue to grapple with the challenges of organ donation and transplantation, it is important to approach this issue with a thoughtful and nuanced understanding of the ethical considerations at stake.
I have a question regarding rejection.
Would not doing a bone marrow transplant along with the donor organ,
further help with fusing the donor organ to the new compatible recipient?
therfore aid in preventing rejection of seid organ further along the line and less need for reliance on anti rejection drugs.
Thankyou
Naw. Who’s yer maw.
@@lizzygrant5546 oh a retard appears with an opinion with no evidence as to why. Bye fool
@@lizzygrant5546 fake account with no subs or content
@@Surferant666 calm down
@@lizzygrant5546 again fake account. you have no opinion worthy of any future reply- shadow man
As a poor person with the disease known as non-alcoholic cirrhosis, this is inhumane and a fundamental problem with taking another person’s body parts. I believe we instead should have put more funding and time and research into healing one’s own organs or into the vastly underfunded industry of artificial organs. We should be burying the people who are dead with respect.
Kitchen Conversation from 28th November 1984, by 'Billy' Eduard Albert Meier (BEAM)
Question: What causes manifestations of mental fluidal forces and what do they contain? And what are mental fluidal forces and how do they work? And what about the body's own mental fluidal forces, for example when organs of one person are implanted into another?
Answer: Unfortunately, at the present time and even at the end of the 20th century, terrestrial man has not yet reached the point where he is able to physically grasp, measure and explain the mental fluidal forces, and consequently there is still complete ignorance in this regard. This is also the case with regard to the transmission of the mental fluid forces to other humans, when transplants of other deceased or living people are implanted into them. Confusion is also caused by those elements that try to explain the whole thing from a religious or spiritualistic and esoteric point of view with nonsense, which contributes to the fact that everything is misunderstood and viewed from a perspective of delusional belief.
Now, as far as organ transplantation is concerned, when an organ of one person is transplanted into another, it is not a harmless matter. Because the truth is this: The body's own mental fluidal forces or vibrations are so massive that they are very strongly deposited or stored in all organs. The mental fluidal forces or mental vibrations contain in their energies and powers everything that is generated by the mental block as well as by the personality and character. Therefore, it contains not only the energies and forces of thoughts and feelings, as well as of the psyche and consciousness, but also the hopes, desires, habits and idiosyncrasies etc. of the person, which are deposited in the body and all its organs. In the same way, however, this also happens in a neutral way when the mental fluid forces are deposited in rooms, places or objects, which can then be used again by the next personality after its birth. It follows that new personalities can then adopt and express the characteristics and behaviour etc. of their old personalities. However, this is not obligatory, because it is solely up to each individual personality whether or not it accepts or does not accept the neutral in the deposited mental vibrations and their energies and forces old peculiarities and behaviours through reconnections.
What in further explanation concerns the transplantation of organs from one person to another, is that these are absolutely not harmless, as is unfortunately generally and specifically assumed by the medical profession. The truth is that the strongest deposits of mental vibrations with their energies and forces, i.e. the mental fluid forces, are primarily and extremely strongly deposited in the entire body and thus in its organs and skeleton. All mental fluidal forces are stored as solid and permanent information in all body cells. It should be noted that the information of the mental block is deposited in the body's organs and in the entire cell system within seconds, thus creating an 'organic memory' and a 'cellular memory', which then become effective in relation to the transfer of the stored mental cell information to another person when transplants are carried out or when a person has an organ implanted by another person. So if an organ or a bone is taken from a human being - alive or deceased - and transplanted to another, living human being, then this has unpleasant consequences. The fact is that the transplanted organ transmits its mental vibrations, energies, forces and information to the entire body and even to the brain and consciousness of the person to whom the bone or organ is implanted. And since the mental fluid vibrations of the transplant organ of the person from whom it was removed are also transferred to the organ-receiving person through the transplant, this means that peculiarities, wishes, hopes, fears and joys as well as behavioural patterns are also transferred. This can then be seen in the way that the person who has had a foreign organ implanted inevitably sooner or later adopts the idiosyncrasies and behaviour and even the mindset etc. of the person who was the organ donor or bone donor. Of course, not all organs and cells are equally powerful in storing mental information, so there are great differences. The strongest organ in terms of storing mental vibrations, energies, forces and information is the heart, followed by all other important organs of life. And since the mental information storage in the organs and cells takes place in a matter of seconds, it is also clear that even horror experiences etc. are still transmitted and stored in the event of sudden death, and consequently the impulses in this regard are transferred to the person receiving the transplant in the case of an organ transplant. Sudden death is therefore also stored as mental vibrations, energies and forces in the cells and organs, just like all other things that arise in mental form in the course of life.