My advice would be to stick with 15/10. Its always better to outplay opponent in position than on the clock- it will help you in tournament play. You may run to a cheater once in a while, but thats internet chess in any time control. Subbed - I am somewhere around your rating (2000 on lichess) enjoying your journey. Keep it up. Your ability to stay optimistic in almost any position is something to aspire for :D
I know, but there wasn't a great time to develop it, and even you can see that from the analysis board, but yeah there are a few moments when it was possible
@@Kpr316 haha bro, I'm super thankful for you man, I do consider the titles, I try not to give away mostly, but sometimes I try to capture the essence of the video moreso in the title so people might click on it more, idkkkk, def something I do consider a lot though! Thanks for the support man, I seriously appreciate you!!
Yeah idk man. I'm pretty confident a not cheating good player would just look at Nh6+ after the Rook sac, see that it works and be happy with a won position. Relying on Rxf5 is crazy and i frankly didn't see that until it was on the board, when Nh6+ was pretty much a no brainer... Hope they do end up banning him if he actually cheated so you get your points back.
I was watching a vid recently on 'how to spot a cheater' and someone having a brand new account like that and all those 90% plus games is a total red flag. That being said, just one thing - In the tartakower variant, I dunno if you need to go for the standard and easily broken pin on the knight. If you capture the knight, that loses you the bishop pair and if you don't and retreat it to h5 I don't think that helps you attack on the kingside and it seems to just get you jammed in and vunerable to that knight. You might consider something like this instead - th-cam.com/video/mKQG_bnyuew/w-d-xo.html It just seems more solid. Also just one more thing, if you wanted to show 2 games a video, you could possibly consider editing out some of your opponent's thinking time (aka the several minutes he spent consulting stockfish during your game). As always, best of luck!
Are you sure you're going in the right direction? 2100 is more than 2000, not less. Anyway, Tartakower is a funny name but it always feels harder for black.
Did you happen to notice how much time he spent on average per move?? Id wager he used an engine periodically. Most of his moves weren't that difficult to find. I must say though, your pony and rook were very sad this game!!
Even against non-cheaters I despise playing against the Classical Variation
@@AverageBishop- the classical variation is my least favourite for sure
My advice would be to stick with 15/10. Its always better to outplay opponent in position than on the clock- it will help you in tournament play. You may run to a cheater once in a while, but thats internet chess in any time control. Subbed - I am somewhere around your rating (2000 on lichess) enjoying your journey. Keep it up. Your ability to stay optimistic in almost any position is something to aspire for :D
@@banjoglider an thanks Mr banjo! I'll try to keep focused and stay positive!!
Cheater bro!
@ facts
10;12 be2 looks strong
would have been a good attempt!
I think it would be interesting to know how many games I've lost to cheaters and how many of them got banned
@@AverageBishop- haha yes, it's getting ridiculous
F5 was very suspicious
@@majid48941 yeah, he was really really strong
Yeah Blunder Man. You're knight never left its original position. Try to always develop all your pieces first mate, you know this.
I know, but there wasn't a great time to develop it, and even you can see that from the analysis board, but yeah there are a few moments when it was possible
160% a Cheater, Report Him
@@XTOPH3RZ haha 170% in my opinion
Please consider not having spoilers in the title. Love the content regardless
@@Kpr316 didn't feel like there was a spoiler, you don't know if I played even more perfectly
I "consider" everything I do...
@Blunder_Man I love watching every night. I thumbs up that shit too. U da man. Just my 2 cents
@@Kpr316 haha bro, I'm super thankful for you man, I do consider the titles, I try not to give away mostly, but sometimes I try to capture the essence of the video moreso in the title so people might click on it more, idkkkk, def something I do consider a lot though! Thanks for the support man, I seriously appreciate you!!
Oh no always check profiles first
@@AverageBishop- I should yes
This guy has a very high percentage, I would report him. Cheater for sure
I tend to think so, but yeah, you never know
Yeah idk man. I'm pretty confident a not cheating good player would just look at Nh6+ after the Rook sac, see that it works and be happy with a won position. Relying on Rxf5 is crazy and i frankly didn't see that until it was on the board, when Nh6+ was pretty much a no brainer...
Hope they do end up banning him if he actually cheated so you get your points back.
Hoping to get them back, but we'll see!!
I was watching a vid recently on 'how to spot a cheater' and someone having a brand new account like that and all those 90% plus games is a total red flag. That being said, just one thing - In the tartakower variant, I dunno if you need to go for the standard and easily broken pin on the knight. If you capture the knight, that loses you the bishop pair and if you don't and retreat it to h5 I don't think that helps you attack on the kingside and it seems to just get you jammed in and vunerable to that knight. You might consider something like this instead - th-cam.com/video/mKQG_bnyuew/w-d-xo.html It just seems more solid.
Also just one more thing, if you wanted to show 2 games a video, you could possibly consider editing out some of your opponent's thinking time (aka the several minutes he spent consulting stockfish during your game).
As always, best of luck!
I'm open to that, and I do occasionally edit it out when I'm not talking especially, thanks for the feedback!
I think after an account reaches 1000s or even less you should have to submit an ID to verify who you are.
Time for common sense reform.
chess.com needs to do something
Are you sure you're going in the right direction? 2100 is more than 2000, not less.
Anyway, Tartakower is a funny name but it always feels harder for black.
The Tartakower is difficult to play but objectively it's really good
I love it and I'm gonna keep playing it
Did you happen to notice how much time he spent on average per move?? Id wager he used an engine periodically. Most of his moves weren't that difficult to find. I must say though, your pony and rook were very sad this game!!
They were indeed, there was a point when I could develop the knight and didn't!
Cheater
Please report the cheater I've done it too
You legends