Tibetan Buddhism and Non-Duality by James Low

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ต.ค. 2024
  • James Low is a well-known translator and teacher of Dzogchen, the non-duality tradition of Tibetan Buddhism. With a background in psychotherapy, he was a student of Chigmed Rigdzin Lama (known as C.R.Lama) as well as Chogyal Namkhai Norbu. He is the author of several books, including Simply Being, Being Right Here, Being Guru Rinpoche, Yogins of Ladakh and the translator of the Collected Works of C.R.Lama. 'Sparks' is his latest offering - a collection of writings which are an expression of the profound non-dual view of Dzogchen, which illuminates the Buddha potential in all of us.
    'Simply Being is the ground or basis of every occurrence; it is the unchanging awareness which reveals the ever-changing play of existence. This is Dzogchen, the wholeness and completion within which we live'.

ความคิดเห็น • 136

  • @quasimodoo17
    @quasimodoo17 2 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    I've been practicing Buddhism for 25 years. This is one of the best talks I've ever heard. I particularly like the way how James uses concrete examples of every day life.

    • @Georgetimothy-d1b
      @Georgetimothy-d1b 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Imperfection is beautiful Andi enjoy the beauty of imperfection

    • @nickgold2012
      @nickgold2012 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think one of the best talks on nondualism I've ever seen, through the filter of any nondual tradition. ☺🙏

  • @thomasbrouwer2771
    @thomasbrouwer2771 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Every second of this talk is filled with wisdom and eloquence.

  • @tommyharmon214
    @tommyharmon214 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Of all the Tibetan Buddhist practitioners, I have never heard someone describe the tradition and it’s process with such clarity.

  • @tinychapter.
    @tinychapter. 4 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    I absolutely love how this man talks.

    • @renatoalcides5104
      @renatoalcides5104 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      without effort or pride, gentle, serene, alive.

    • @heruka111
      @heruka111 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Truly a blessing, Id like to imagine that this is how guru rinpoche talked

  • @chrisd6982
    @chrisd6982 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    An astonishingly cogent and captivating exposition. Bravo!

  • @renatoalcides5104
    @renatoalcides5104 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    such clarity of thought, such intimacy with the subject he is speaking, and a precise and dare I say a humble and heroic clear view of it all. may I have the chance to reach and touch such teachings, a true blessing to hear his voice, follow the wise movement of his hands and the detached wisdom of his heart.

  • @J_heterodox
    @J_heterodox 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    James Low is a true master

  • @MrFarang10
    @MrFarang10 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I am barely half way into his teaching and sharing of this wonderful dharma talk. And I am already hooked.
    Thank you for your dharma talk, Mr. Low

  • @domb0
    @domb0 6 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    “You are a flow of experience, in the radiant field of awareness. And that’s not what you are taught in school.”

  • @theroyalpundit5838
    @theroyalpundit5838 6 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    James is a wonderful teacher, very real, grounded and deeply insightful. He's been a good friend and mentor of mine for many years, I highly recommend him as a guide to consciousness and the human experience of simply being ;)

  • @waltelbow
    @waltelbow 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This was a gift

  • @Wattawalkka
    @Wattawalkka 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your hand gestures remind me of plow work. You're sowing seeds here. This world needs to be naturally sensible if were to advance.

  • @theunamed2039
    @theunamed2039 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    His accent seems to have changed dramatically in recent videos. Incredibly eloquent. Pleasure to listen to

  • @makiisbro1129
    @makiisbro1129 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Much love to you for sharing this

  • @tonyjoyce9811
    @tonyjoyce9811 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Incredible talk james very precise and enlightening thank you for bothering to post it long live buddhism from tony a buddha living in the community not finding it easy but not giving up

  • @martinweber2178
    @martinweber2178 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    how comes, that his sharings always bring so much ease and relaxation to my mind ....

  • @hgracern
    @hgracern 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Exceptional clarity explained brilliantly. Thank you. 🌷

  • @artofmetta7401
    @artofmetta7401 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    lovely, thank u

  • @albertineno2443
    @albertineno2443 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Such clarity. Thanks and gratitude J.

  • @jadeglouglou
    @jadeglouglou 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    As James signature, always very clear, systematic and straight to the point! It's interesting how even just an intellectual understanding --without realization-- of dzogchen can be of practical use in the relative world

  • @danlewis7641
    @danlewis7641 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wonderful talk. Thank you James.

  • @manishbhatt500
    @manishbhatt500 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I absolutely love his talks. I have just started listening to. The mirror example comes up in almost all spiritual talks and most stop by saying that it’s empty and unaffected by its content but the true realization is that there’s no mirror at all. The “I” is just an emergent property

  • @sawtoothiandi
    @sawtoothiandi 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    had to watch this about 3 times before i started to get some of it! thank you!!!

    • @zyxmyk
      @zyxmyk 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      i detect no end to suffering in this jibber jabber.

    • @sawtoothiandi
      @sawtoothiandi 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@zyxmyk the goal is to step beyond jibber jabber, but a little jibber jabber is often required to point out the exits..

  • @StephenWard9
    @StephenWard9 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I can meditate just watching his hands!

  • @dav220
    @dav220 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    master of words and deepest most relatable explanation. thank you buddhamind

  • @dinocosta6819
    @dinocosta6819 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Excellent clear teaching! Thanks!

  • @martynbrown1347
    @martynbrown1347 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thankyou James 🙏

  • @merijnhoogenstrijd9141
    @merijnhoogenstrijd9141 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Robert Pirsig would have really valued this talk with it's many references to patterns of quality in static and dynamic expressions which arise out of a moral emptiness (or as Pirsig would say pure dynamic quality) that is reflecting back upon itself. Exceptional clarity in it's statement of the dharma here.

  • @antarjyotiantarjyoti7205
    @antarjyotiantarjyoti7205 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    clear like crystal by someone who undoubtedly has the living experience!!!

  • @irenecarlos6039
    @irenecarlos6039 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much! It is very understandable and clear in spite of the complex theme, the way you present teachings. Makes me feel you leave a seed of clarity in my consiousness.

  • @robertjsmith
    @robertjsmith 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    just found this,thanks great talk,i reacon when the people leave and go into the street,they will experience fluidity and emptiness in all things

  • @floyd3276
    @floyd3276 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Dzogchen combined with phowa must have been what I practiced in my last life to allow me to remember in between lives and birth.

  • @bpotter9769
    @bpotter9769 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One all is a flow of - non identified ! - experiences in the radiant field of awareness, all one
    Non identified ! Is the key principle 🙏❤️
    No I, no observer, yet a mirror or a neutral lens 🙏❤️

  • @eshwrnr1581
    @eshwrnr1581 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very Clear Presentation!

  • @californiamonster8877
    @californiamonster8877 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Some Castaneda plus James Low is a good ‘place’ to ‘be’

  • @zyxmyk
    @zyxmyk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    youtube ads are becoming unbearable.

  • @johnatkinson7479
    @johnatkinson7479 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you,great talk

  • @petermartin5030
    @petermartin5030 ปีที่แล้ว

    Interestingly I can see how what he is describing relates to the process architecture of consciousness, which I have been researching for several years from an information technology viewpoint.

  • @blackrhino44
    @blackrhino44 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome. 🙏🏼

  • @lnbartstudio2713
    @lnbartstudio2713 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wonderful ! Certainly puts materialistic science on notice.

    • @pillettadoinswartsh4974
      @pillettadoinswartsh4974 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Science is wrong only in its reliance on materialism as being the ground of all existence. But during the last 100 years, science has begun to show (to itself) cracks in that belief. *And it IS a belief.* The entire scientific method is based upon that belief. 100 years after Quantum Theory, and scientists STILL haven't settled on any one interpretation of it. That is because it appears to rely on the observer................
      Science no longer allows room for even philosophy, which is its Godfather. Science was originally called "Natural Philosophy." But materialists have wrested control even from them. While science has given us many nice things, it has also unleashed the terrible power of nuclear war. This is all based upon science's belief in material existence being primary, and ironically threatens the annihilation of it all.
      On the other hand, everything in Dzogchen, Advaita, and every other non-dual teaching is based upon that which everyone is aware. No beliefs necessary. Consciousness is obviously primary, or science wouldn't have waited until the 1990's to even BEGIN any attempt at studying it.
      I presume that science will soon need to revise its method to include consciousness. And once it is forced to do this, the game is up. Why scientists struggle so hard for their belief is quizzical, because realization of non-dual reality does not at all constrict or limit scientific discovery. That is the beauty of it. While certain scientists appear hellbent on "disproving" everything non-material.
      Scientists like Sam Harris already study non-duality teachings. And the cracks will continue to grow and multiply.

  • @chrisgardiner6479
    @chrisgardiner6479 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Read Simply Being years ago, just bought Sparks and looking forward to a modern take on the same message.

  • @jimji2774
    @jimji2774 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I know there is great wisdom in Buddhism but by its nature it is very scholarly and can be overly mental and dry for me. This man brings this teaching out of the East and adds an emotional aspect that I can feel to make it altogether palatable. Just purchased Sparks as it was said to be more nonsectarian. Will see if I can digest it or if I just need to see James explain it while I hear his voice and watch his body.

  • @jesuisravi
    @jesuisravi 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    many thanks

  • @desertportal353
    @desertportal353 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is just wonderful. So then Lord Shiva was a very great Lama! ;)

  • @JasonGafar
    @JasonGafar 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Amazing talk!
    Can't wait until I've completed my first set of preliminary practices to head forward into Dzogchen.

    • @ernestweber5207
      @ernestweber5207 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Waiting, huh? ;) Forward? Ah!

    • @swetaimbert1114
      @swetaimbert1114 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wow! All the best. I’m supposed to do my practice is absolute slack :/

    • @waiataaroha
      @waiataaroha 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      wrong view.

  • @michaclaessen1265
    @michaclaessen1265 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Brilliant !

  • @petermartin5030
    @petermartin5030 ปีที่แล้ว

    With this insight, expressed here with great clarity, what is the status of the base drives and motivations that keep us alive and reproducing? They seem potentially in opposition to non-duality.

  • @warricksoto3766
    @warricksoto3766 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    WOW! U r a true WIZARD just reminding IGNORANCE once more that, this is just WHAT IS! This is incredible WISDOM! APPRECIATION HAPPENS HERE! Which is there also...

  • @ommanipadmehum3143
    @ommanipadmehum3143 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    For the liberation of all sentient beings

  • @gives_bad_advice
    @gives_bad_advice ปีที่แล้ว

    'we are inventing what we seem to be perceiving' interesting.

  • @tenzindasel1780
    @tenzindasel1780 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliant!

  • @Tom-lx5re
    @Tom-lx5re 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great talk but the number of adverts make it near unwatchable

  • @kraftenator
    @kraftenator 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you : )

  • @batonmorina5438
    @batonmorina5438 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Mate you have so many ads on this video

  • @gehrhardtschneider
    @gehrhardtschneider 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    James has a lot of duality on his bookcase.

  • @alankuntz6494
    @alankuntz6494 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is he aware of standing in front of that Aleistor Crowley book?

  • @independencemp3
    @independencemp3 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    flow of experiences…

  • @WisdomofMindBody
    @WisdomofMindBody 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have been trying to understand if Kashmir Shaivism is the root of Vajrayana Buddhism. Because both are in Northwest India and tantra. Shaivism says every form is a play of Shiva, known as Shakti. Shiva-Shakti is union of our True Consciousness and form. When I hear you describe Dzochen, you said the same thing in different words. For example, the Dalai Lama gave a Mahakala blessing yesterday in Dharamsala and said growing up, his mother and himself felt very close to Mahakala. Mahakala is the fierce form of Shiva. Yet a documentary of Mahakala said he is the wrathful form of Chenrezig, who is Avolokiteshvara Bodhisattva. How come there are two versions of who Mahakala is? In Shaivism, Mahakala is the only self-originated lingam and is worshipped as a fierce form of Shiva. I wonder if Vajrayana Buddhism, specifically Dzochen is actually a branch that broke away from Shaivism and introduced to Tibet as Vajrayana Buddhism.

  • @rmarlin
    @rmarlin 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Everything is frequency (source) not just the physical planes (multiverse) but also the non-physical planes, there is no you nor I but oneness.

  • @eileenlohrer5876
    @eileenlohrer5876 ปีที่แล้ว

    What book is he referring to?

  • @chrisd6982
    @chrisd6982 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Was it 44.44 on purpose? Who edited this? :)

  • @thomasschwarz1973
    @thomasschwarz1973 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would be interested to here what the author understands/feels about the transience of Buddhism and humanity....? Isn't Buddhism also compounded? Also, assuming the subtlemost nature of mind is not compounded, what percent would you say, of the grosser levels of mind, actually are compounded and will also go away?

  • @69VAJRA
    @69VAJRA ปีที่แล้ว

    I know how it feels to have enlightment
    He cant explain that
    Better he show method in certain timeframe to be in higher awareness then person see by him self without endless explenation
    But some people makes meanless talk to a job

  • @robertkroner4036
    @robertkroner4036 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    where is this recorded i know this place?

  • @KREN12623
    @KREN12623 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    ❤️❤️❤️🙏🙏🙏❤️❤️❤️

  • @freeman669
    @freeman669 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    ❤️

  • @frankfeldman6657
    @frankfeldman6657 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So the goal is to attain the oceanic consciousness of infants? It seems to boil down to that.

    • @FirstPersonHood
      @FirstPersonHood 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      See that oceanic consciousness is already realized. headless.org

  • @lobsangtharchin3235
    @lobsangtharchin3235 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir if our inherent nature is pure then why different relative thoughts manifest different sentient beings in Samsara?it should remain pure without relative thoughts n feelings.

    • @MrCookding
      @MrCookding 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think the word "pure" is used due to lack of words describing what is unborn or never come into being.

  • @baguiobroom1
    @baguiobroom1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you.. clearly explained.. may i share also what i find similar to dzogchen in the christian tradition.. pls look up luisa piccarreta...google divine will

  • @yoso585
    @yoso585 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is it they say?: Whatever floats your boat!

  • @lobsangtharchin3235
    @lobsangtharchin3235 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    If we are pure from the beginning then why all the negative emotions coming from the pure ground mind?

    • @MrCookding
      @MrCookding 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We are deluded from the first moment and continue to be deluded.

    • @nik8099
      @nik8099 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MrCookding It doesn't help with western materialist science. By the way, Buddhists imo shouldn't be appealing to science.

    • @MrCookding
      @MrCookding 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@nik8099 theoretical buddhist or experimental buddhist?

    • @nik8099
      @nik8099 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MrCookding What are the differences? But both I guess.

    • @MrCookding
      @MrCookding 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nik8099 We should approach Buddhism like an experimental scientist moving toward realizing the nature of mind (not by concepts). In the teaching, it also mentions we should approach it like a smart businessman.

  • @bogdanjablonski5083
    @bogdanjablonski5083 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    MISTER! I FOUND YOU HONEST AND QUALIFIED BUDDHIST....BUT WHAT ABOUT PAIN9STRICTLY) BODY GIVEN BY CHRISTIANS JEWS AND OTHERS?

  • @cringenaenaebaby3543
    @cringenaenaebaby3543 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    He says his "r"'s like he is french, but speaks with an English accent, very fun voice

    • @sawtoothiandi
      @sawtoothiandi 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      its scottish, i believe, not sure which part of scotland though.

  • @thomasschwarz1973
    @thomasschwarz1973 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "Endless preocupation that countries have about immigration", how about taking responsibility for that in your own relgion? Did you know that Sera Jay and all Buddhist Monasteries that I know of (and all Western Universitites) have strong walls, and strict systems of both integration and rejection? That is natural. You will find it in your garden, since the origin of Karma... ...so yes, the meaning of life is to have a warm heart, and to sincerely radiate that warmth, and so in many profound ways, borders become untenable and cold hearted. But better to express that realization than to attack the walls that demarcate one culture or religion from another.... right?

  • @alankuntz6494
    @alankuntz6494 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well we certainly got a introduction to Aleistor Crowley too. ;)

    • @sawtoothiandi
      @sawtoothiandi 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      he was a yogi too, of a sort

    • @babygorl9541
      @babygorl9541 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Who's that, keep hearing about him

    • @alankuntz6494
      @alankuntz6494 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@babygorl9541 He's basically a sex magick left hand hermetic kabbalist. Called himself the Great Beast 666.The founder of Thelema. Grew up in a puritan environment and gave his soul to the devil because they were boring as hell hahaha. That other book on the shelf titled "Moon Child" That's a goody too.

    • @alankuntz6494
      @alankuntz6494 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sawtoothiandi Yeah he tryed a bunch of stuff. He was a advocate of Pranayama and talked about a lot of different types of meditation practices too. You could say he was a Vajrayana tantrik with out the Vajrayana or buddhist ethics or precepts. I guess Mr Low want's folks to tune into him or he wouldn't be standing in front of his books. He should be standing in front of Daniel Cozorts book "Highest Yoga Tantra" That would be a much better introduction to Vajrayana sex Magick. It certainly explains the direction of possible sanity and enlightenment you might want to go. It explains the stages of generation of the winds or kundalini how to lock that in the central channel, what happens and what you experience if it's not or is. Explains what the completion stage of generation of the winds (kundalini ).Talks about real or imaginary sexual consorts, blue drop visualization meditation, meditating on the empties or emptiness etc etc . It's pretty heavy. Beware, you get into all that stuff you could lose your mind.. That's kind of the whole point.

    • @sawtoothiandi
      @sawtoothiandi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alankuntz6494 think i lost mine a few sun laps ago. yeah, regards crowley, his personal ethics sure seemed to be deficient from a regular buddhist viewpoint. though i wonder how much of his shock-rock aesthetic is in the vein of alice cooper, black sabbath, marilyn manson et al?

  • @chandrakishorepythonchered2823
    @chandrakishorepythonchered2823 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    According to our (Parikshith Religious Members) current theory, we believe that there must be two consciousness , one is constant and the other as variable. We are imposing constant consciousness as god, who is independent always wealthy never experiences poor. Whereas variable consciousness is dependent on constant consciousness, who experiences both richness and poorness. And agree with you that variable consciousness can have the ability to experience non Duality or eternity.
    www.parikshithcommunity.com

  • @gyurmethlodroe1774
    @gyurmethlodroe1774 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now I realise that I am a perfectly rotten tomato

  • @nerroseven
    @nerroseven 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    GEMS? 3,

  • @DrMARDOC
    @DrMARDOC 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    THIS IS A. BODHISATTVA

  • @shreyayonjan4405
    @shreyayonjan4405 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    4444 😮

  • @szymonw4355
    @szymonw4355 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hahaha good laugh, BS sir infinte and infinte as you said

  • @swingtrade2
    @swingtrade2 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    has no idea...........................

    • @pillettadoinswartsh4974
      @pillettadoinswartsh4974 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      well done. impossible to tell if you are trolling, perplexed, or enlightened............

    • @alankuntz6494
      @alankuntz6494 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well you tell us about it then..What's your idea?

    • @iamessence6268
      @iamessence6268 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      What you have in mind?

  • @johnwong7200
    @johnwong7200 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Too much talk. Talk is in itself dualistic. Non-dualism is no-thought, and no-thought is no-thought, empty. Talking is thought. So talking only takes one away from no-thought. Truly, just walk it, not talk it, literally.

    • @jampasherab5729
      @jampasherab5729 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      To share the teachings is considered the best kind of generosity, like Buddha Shakyamuni himself did, non less than the source of all this wisdom

    • @FirstPersonHood
      @FirstPersonHood 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nondualism is a word that simply points to the fact that all phenomenon (everything) is the play of duality.Once duality is understood it is simply recognized that living is nondual. headless.org

    • @babygorl9541
      @babygorl9541 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Non-duality doesn't mean never making sounds.....

  • @joanmarietsultrimparkin1821
    @joanmarietsultrimparkin1821 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not that clear .. too much secular emphasis on words that are forceful not force fields.this man needs a vacation. Or a long silent retreat..
    In high mountains.

  • @kf1559
    @kf1559 ปีที่แล้ว

    Found this after Waking Up App.X