DIN Regulators and Converters - Scuba Tech Tips: S04E14

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 พ.ย. 2016
  • There is a common misconception regarding DIN vs yoke regulators and which is "better". Alec gives a clear comparison between the common yoke vs threaded DIN regulator and how to easily convert between both.
    The key difference is DIN regulators and valves are essential if tank pressure is 3,500 psi (241 bar) or higher. If below 3,500 psi then yoke or DIN regulators can be used depending on tank valve and diver preference.
    **** Alec Peirce Scuba ****
    SCUBA TECH TIPS playlists
    ▶︎ Series 6: • Scuba Tech Tips - Seri...
    ▶︎ Series 5: • Scuba Tech Tips - Seri...
    ▶︎ Series 4: • Scuba Tech Tips - Seri...
    ▶︎ Series 1, 2 & 3: • Scuba Tech Tips - Seri...
    VINTAGE SCUBA playlists
    ▶︎ Series 3: • Vintage Scuba - Series 3
    ▶︎ Series 2: • Vintage Scuba - Series 2
    ▶︎ Series 1: • Vintage Scuba - Series 1
    SEA HUNT REMEMBERED playlists
    ▶︎ Series 2: • Sea Hunt Remembered - ...
    ▶︎ Series 1: • Sea Hunt Remembered - ...
    SCUBA 2000
    ▶︎ Website: www.scuba2000.com
    ▶︎ Facebook: / scuba2000
    ▶︎ SEA HUNT COLLECTOR website: seahuntcollector.com
  • กีฬา

ความคิดเห็น • 395

  • @gregbruner1918
    @gregbruner1918 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Recap of PRO/CON for DIN valves:
    DIN Pros:
    1) Higher pressure rating gives many benefits.
    a. Required for some types of diving
    b. Allows me to use a HP tank that is smaller but holds more gas for longer dives
    2) Easier to use with any tank valve type (simple adapter that is user installed)
    3) Lower profile so it doesn't hit your head as easy
    4) Lighter weight
    DIN Cons:
    1) Potentially more expensive up front (currently ~$10-20 more for a first/second stat set)
    a. Actually cheaper in the long run if you ever want to dive on a HP tank. It will cost you more than $100 to convert your yoke stage to DIN and also have an adapter for traveling if the dive location is yoke only. It will only cost you ~$50 for a din to yoke adapter if you travel.
    2) If you are a complete fool, you could cross thread the 1st stage putting it on the tank.
    Conclusion:
    PLEASE don't buy a Yoke regulator. It was a mistake I almost immediately regretted.

  • @ivoryjohnson4662
    @ivoryjohnson4662 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you sir for clearing that up without making it a doctoral thesis . I am starting to use doubles and high pressure tanks for more advance diving.You have been a mentor an inspiration to help me make it this far long before I took my first sip from a regulator. Regardless of the naysayers out there I appreciate you sharing your time and knowledge (free of charge at that) to regular folks like me. Please continue your series as long as you are able to,

  • @IM35461
    @IM35461 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Indeed as Alec mentions the old yoke o-ring dates back to an era when tank pressures were a lot lower and thus it was under less strain.
    In the United Kingdom and Europe we also have 5 and 7 thread DIN with the 7 thread ones needed for 300 Bar tanks (4400PSI).

  • @pecosray
    @pecosray 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    At the age of 55, I started diving, and so I TH-cam the heck out of it. ThankYou so much for all your videos, love them all and especially you attitude and how much fun you are, peace and god blessed

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for your comment Rene.
      I'm 15 years older than you and still enjoy diving.
      I admit that I'm more particular about where I dive - no more mudholes or icy water.
      And at my age I've learned what's important - good attitude.
      I have no intention of dying a miserable, old man.
      If you can't laugh with me, I'll laugh at myself.
      Take care and good luck.
      Alec

  • @bj133
    @bj133 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your knowledge and expertise knocks most internet warriors straight out of their fins. Thank you for all your great videos.

  • @rays9033
    @rays9033 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Alex always provides the most informative explanations, while keeping the audience engaged in the topic. What a great personality!

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well thank you Ray.
      Just for the record, I have no idea who this very intelligent and insightful gentleman is.
      Alec

  • @montypythonish
    @montypythonish 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Alec, still loving the videos and still find your non bias opinion very refreshing.
    I thought I'd email a minor translation for some of your many UK viewers, some of whom are possibly new to the wonderful world of SCUBA.
    We in the UK call the 'Yoke' type 1st stage 'A' clamp. We also call 'Tanks' Cylinders and we measure their volume in litres, not cubic feet and their pressure in BAR rather than PSI, so sometimes I need to translate your Canadian into our UK.
    As I've said to you before, I've been diving over here for about 12 years and have both types of 1st stage, depending on what diving I am doing. I have an 'A' clamp (Yoke) pool set for training but 3 DIN sets for diving. A single set and two for twin set diving. I also carry 2 x 'A' to DIN adapters in my kit, just in case.
    Excellent videos, marvellous channels, keep up the good work.

  • @ZZ-ww3yt
    @ZZ-ww3yt 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Alec you're a great man! Serving the scuba community... A new diver like me has learnt a lot from his videos and advices...God bless!

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Glad to help a new diver learn more and become a smarter, safer diver. Lots more to watch until your as smart as me.
      Thanks for watching.
      Alec

  • @mixasid2464
    @mixasid2464 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One more clear and complete explonation. Many thanks Mr. Pierce!

  • @mikebrennersports9597
    @mikebrennersports9597 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well Done Alec. Informative, straight to the point and just enough flair to make me chuckle. Thanks!

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you learned something and had a laugh, thats good for me.
      Thanks for watching.
      Alec

  • @doncunning
    @doncunning 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brand new diver here and OMG THANK YOU!!!! I was seriously confused prior and you have made this topic crystal clear. Again THANK YOU for the time taken to make this instructional video.

  • @JenniferPChung
    @JenniferPChung 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow this really helped me out explaining what it all is and how it's used!! Thank you!! I looked through a few articles and videos but I didn't understand it till I watched yours! So seriously! Thank you for explaining it so well!!

  • @Starwarsgames66
    @Starwarsgames66 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you Alec for the informative videos! Thank you for showing new divers how to become a great scuba diver! Much appreciated!

  • @karlmarx7450
    @karlmarx7450 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    As always, super-great. Used your advise with great pleasure. Thanks a million, Karl.

    • @AlecPeirceAtTheRanch
      @AlecPeirceAtTheRanch 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This is your 7th comment about 7 different videos in less than 10 hours Karl.
      What are you a binge watcher/!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      Alec

  • @caleb202
    @caleb202 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome tech tips! I have made a lot of purchase decisions based on your video. Please keep up the good work!

  • @bugman9787
    @bugman9787 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Alec, I was wondering about the difference. I started diving in the ‘70’s and have not been diving for a number of years. I’m getting back into diving and upgrading equipment and this is great information!

  • @Willdostyles
    @Willdostyles 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Alec, this isn't a question but just wanted to say I absolutely rate your videos. They are very informative and useful to watch. Even things I had enough basic knowledge on your videos help expand that knowledge and how I can explain things to other divers who have questions. Keep it up.

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks Will. I'll do them as long as possible I have a year of ideas to shoot already. Keep watching, lots of information/tips you probably have never known to come.
      Alec

  • @chrisg743
    @chrisg743 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks for sharing all your experience with us, I've learned alot! it never dawned on me that you were doing these for free

  • @gillman0566
    @gillman0566 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great episode Pierce, I use an Aqualung Mistral 2005 model double hose regulator that's a DIN connection, I had put one of those DIN to yoke adapters for my 80cf tank, LOL I had no idea what I had, learning from you Pierce, just made my double hose regulator even more awesome! Thanks

  • @TheCryptKeeper8
    @TheCryptKeeper8 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliant information. Thank you sir. You've saved me a major headache.

  • @duanstrydom1771
    @duanstrydom1771 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks. Got yourself a new sub. Nobody seems to be able to explain things the way you do sir.

  • @ChrisEpler
    @ChrisEpler 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    DIN==Better. More compact, more secure connection, can be field converted to yoke, higher pressure support, you know your O-ring status before the dive. Only drawback is if you run into yoke only tanks w/o the pro-valves, and that's not a fault of DIN... :) Maybe we need a yoke confiscation program to get everyone converted over!

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That would be interesting. There are a heck of a lot more yokes in use worldwide.
      Alec

    • @MrRagool
      @MrRagool 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      What’s a pro valve?

    • @emahaffey2981
      @emahaffey2981 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MrRagool a Pro Valve is the same thing Mr Peirce refers to as a conversion valve in this video. The tank valve has a plug you may add or remove to easily switch between yoke and DIN. Pro Valve is just the trade name. I know Faber puts these on their hp steel cylinders.

    • @amadeuss3341
      @amadeuss3341 ปีที่แล้ว

      You sound like one of those annoying divers on the boat.
      Do you own shearwater as well ?

    • @tkanters
      @tkanters 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agree that DIN is better in almost every aspect.
      - support for higher pressure
      - takes less space
      - the o-ring belongs to the first stage. So you are not dependent on the rental o-ring that has been out in the sun the entire season.
      - the yoke can be more fragile. To metal failures.
      I think yoke is slightly easier / faster to connect. But can’t think of any other positives.

  • @juancarlosbriceno4185
    @juancarlosbriceno4185 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome video! Love the tech tips! Really cleared a lot of questions. THANK YOU!!!

  • @beverley-jaynelast6547
    @beverley-jaynelast6547 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brilliant...I am now no longer confused.

  • @IreneWY
    @IreneWY 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very informative, as always. Thanks Alec :)

  • @davidg.5647
    @davidg.5647 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great info. Exactly what I needed

  • @timyoung2818
    @timyoung2818 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love that you started diving the year Sea Hunt began!

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Sea Hunt was my inspiration to become a diver like Mike Nelson. Go diving, catch bad guys and get the girl too. I am the largest collector of Sea Hunt memorabilia in the world. Maybe watch my Sea Hunt Remembered playlist to see the old days again.

    • @timyoung2818
      @timyoung2818 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter I love the Sea Hunt show so much, it's an obsession. They don't make TV like that today. Absolutely brilliant.

  • @nickroadnight9549
    @nickroadnight9549 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    How is it after 15 years diving I’ve never come across your vids! Bloody brilliant and loving your style.

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Wow, thank you! Maybe its because I don't advertise, ask for subscriptions/likes or $$$. Guess I'm crazy but this is how I want to share my life's diving experiences with others. Thanks for watching.

    • @aminnekoubin
      @aminnekoubin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter Thanks for your generosity.

  • @lupusdeum3894
    @lupusdeum3894 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You nailed it, Divemaster Alec!👍

  • @foxglovepi1434
    @foxglovepi1434 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Really good video, now I get it. Thanks

  • @martinbachmann6283
    @martinbachmann6283 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for a GREAT instructional video on this Alec! My local LDS (the owner himself) tried to explain the > 3500psi &

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I got you on a good day eh? ("Eh" is Canadian for 'huh')
      It really is quite simple but some people can complicate anything.
      I'm glad I was able to help.
      Alec

  • @HuckleberryMoon
    @HuckleberryMoon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What a perfect explanation. Thank you!

  • @bubblecrush6459
    @bubblecrush6459 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    precious infamation , easy explain. Respect ! Mr. Pierce

  • @jasonmills9158
    @jasonmills9158 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Just a little addendum to Alec’s comment on DIN valves-there are actually two kinds of DIN valve. The Pro Valve like he shows in the video is a 200 bar valve-used for a maximum pressure of around 3000 psi. It easily converts back and forth with the insert he shows.
    There is also a 300 bar DIN valve. This is a higher pressure valve and does NOT convert to a K valve with an insert. The hole where the regulator screws into is deeper on the 300 bar, and while the insert will thread in, it won’t seat properly, and your yoke first stage won’t fit-it’ll be too short.
    Hope this helps someone.

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I simply refer to them as the short/low or long/high DIN threads. You are right doubt the pressure differences and that the 300 bar cannot be converted into a yoke (above the max pressure a yoke can take). Thanks for watching and sharing this information.

    • @jasonmills9158
      @jasonmills9158 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter, I always loved your videos. Always good information to have.

    • @MrRagool
      @MrRagool 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      So as a rec diver primarily who will learn tech and side mount in the coming years should I get the 300bar DIN? how easy is it to find tanks in Indo/PP/TH/APAC in general?

    • @bloodymarvelous4790
      @bloodymarvelous4790 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MrRagool As a diver who's looking to move into tech diving, you should definitely get a DIN regulator. All regulators can handle well above 300 bar of pressure. It's only the Yoke connector that limits the regulator to 232 bar as yo can't secure a Yoke in a way that it can deal with 300 bar. The o-ring will pop out. With DIN the o-ring is secured in the valve and has no pay to pop out.
      If you have a Yoke regulator already, have your local dive shop check if they can swap out the Yoke assembly for a DIN assembly. That way you don't have to buy a whole new regulator set.

  • @714Goldenboy
    @714Goldenboy 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for keeping it simple. Great video👍

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I can make it very technical but what's the point? Only a dozen people would get it!
      I'm trying to get divers to understand more about their gear. I think it will make you a better diver, or at least more comfortable.
      Take care.
      Aec

  • @jlramos3d
    @jlramos3d 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for sharing your knowledge.

  • @TragoudistrosMPH
    @TragoudistrosMPH 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good lord, that was a lot of information, and I understood it! Thank you!!!

  • @agnusdenisepaula
    @agnusdenisepaula 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Simple and clear.
    Thank you

  • @GrafHusten
    @GrafHusten 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I need to buy a regulator kit hesitating din or yoke but this video has helped me damn a lot ! Thank you :)

  • @ScubaGirl68
    @ScubaGirl68 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice explanation. :-)
    There are a few more things to consider. Many tech divers prefer, rightly or wrongly, DIN as they are less likely to have the 1st stage's connection knocked in overhead environments (i.e. wreck penetration or cave diving).
    In the past, I prefered A-Clamp (as I know it) or Yoke or Int. as I've found it easier to quickly connect or remove the 1st stage. However, I am now using DIN.
    Here in the UK, there is now a difference between pillar valves intended for 232 BAR (3364 psi) tanks/cylinders to the pillar valves intended for 300 BAR (4351 psi). As you've already mentioned, the 300 BAR valves are all going to be DIN. New valves also have a different number of threads and a deeper hole for the 1st. The 1st stage now comes with an extra 'nipple' the O-Ring is on the connection. If the charging whips have this nipple too, it prevents non-300 Bar tanks from being filled to such pressures, but a 300 Bar tank can be filled on the 200/232 Bar whip.
    Finally, O-Rings. Yep, it's an obvious one for anyone who runs a dive centre, but it can be an issue for the unwary.
    With the Yoke system, the O-Ring is on the tank pillar valve. Those tanks in a busy resort are likely to be used once a day, every day of the year. They can and do fail. Who is responsible for the tanks? The dive resort. So they have to ensure that the DMs and Instructors have plenty of spare O-Rings. Depending on the quality and number of people on the boat, they could be changing 3 or 4 a week quite easily.
    With the DIN system, those pillar valves don't have an O-Ring (Ok all have one where the valves screw into the tank, but I'm referring to where the 1st stage connects). The O-Ring is on the 1st stage. Ok, if the 1stage has been hired, then it'll be down to the resort to replace one more, but they tend to last better on DIN 1st stages.
    Also if a customer brings their own 1st stage, then it isn't the resort's O-Ring that needs to be changed.
    Ok, I'm sure that a reputable dive resort is not going to let an O-Ring spoil your dive. If you've had your regulators services properly, then that O-Ring will have been changed as a matter of course, so in theory, you should be fine and the O-Ring won't fail so quickly.
    Safe diving everyone!

  • @ArthurDoesThings8960
    @ArthurDoesThings8960 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very helpful!
    Much appreciated!

  • @DarR1299
    @DarR1299 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Damn. That was a great video. Many thanks as I learned something again.

  • @reidsmith5895
    @reidsmith5895 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Than you for an excellent summary of the differences, that clarified a lot I had been unsure about for years. I feel a lot less dumb now, ha ha.

  • @rgorji
    @rgorji 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice video. Nicely explained for all divers.

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks Reza.
      I want divers to be able to make informed decisions about what's best for them - not based on bias from a store owner or dive buddy. I hope you got something from it.
      Alec

    • @rgorji
      @rgorji 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      You have a wonderful way of explaining things. Never elitist, never condescending and always the truth.

  • @johnrmirez5261
    @johnrmirez5261 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are so correct I bought a Sherwood Reg DIN a month ago and just 3 days ago dove 2 cenotes in Tulum Mex and the next day 2 dive in Mahahual Mex and out of ten dive stores in Tulum and about 8 in Mahahual not one dive store had DIN valves so I did not have an adapter and many of the dive shops did not either but eventually got one but your advice on this with specific areas of the world was spot on

  • @adamriley8097
    @adamriley8097 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Alec, you’re the greatest.

  • @wallybrown9509
    @wallybrown9509 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent Alec. Thank you sir

  • @user-oz8ir3eo3m
    @user-oz8ir3eo3m 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You are the best! Thank you for the information

  • @vladimirnekic3241
    @vladimirnekic3241 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for the video... very informative. I was hoping that you would have explained the 200 bar vs 300 bar.

  • @snafupunk1985
    @snafupunk1985 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    As mentioned below DIN is the abreviation for Deutsches Institut für Normierung or Deutsche Industrie Norm. Meaning German Industrial Standard. There are DIN norms for all kinds of different technical things like nuts, bolts, pipes, bricks.... If you take look at some technical stuff you'll find DIN numbers printed or engraved on alot of them as the DIN has become internationally acknowledged in many countries. A DIN norm that pretty muchj everbody is acquainted with is the DIN norm for paparformats. DIN A4. Sound familiar?

  • @richardcurrin8940
    @richardcurrin8940 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great videos Alec, I'm wondering why it took me so long to find them

  • @theandybchannel.1819
    @theandybchannel.1819 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Exactly what I needed to know, thank you. I inherited a scuba bottle but no regulator of any kind.

  • @loko306
    @loko306 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    great tips here!!

  • @theSRA1988
    @theSRA1988 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    you're the king,thanks!!!

  • @andrewburgemeister6684
    @andrewburgemeister6684 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video again Alec!
    Unfortunately last weekend I couldn’t dive since the shop had forgot to put the insert in for my yoke regs, so I learnt to always check whether the tank was for Yoke or for DIN regulators.
    I actually bought a DIN-To-Yoke Insert afterwards which cost $10 (AUD) and then a set of Allen Keys from Bunnings (a tool/hardware/gardening warehouse store chain similar to Home Depot in the US/Canada) for $5 so next time I don’t get caught short.
    I definitely think the insert is the easiest and cheapest option for using Yoke regs with a DIN tank valve.

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Agree. Buy one tank valve and with a convertible insert, have 2 options. Another advantage with the inserts is if a o-ring blows, just unscrew and replace with a spare and dive. Fast and saves trying to safely pull out a bad o-ring when in rush. Thanks for sharing Andrew.

    • @andrewburgemeister6684
      @andrewburgemeister6684 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter my pleasure Alec!

  • @Diveplanwithjim
    @Diveplanwithjim 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Damn, I really love your videos.

  • @christianbauer1430
    @christianbauer1430 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for that great video 😃. Your shows are pure entertainment.
    DIN: Deutsche Industrie Norm which means, that it’s a German Industrial Standard.
    Doesn’t matter much and it’s just an addition for those who wanna know.
    For us Germans, the DIN is more appropriate because the connector is more compact and practical. The O-Ring is attached to the connector, so YOU YOURSELF have to take care about its good condition.
    You helped me a lot to understand the whys and stated some really interesting facts.
    For instance:
    - 3442 psi 237,31 bars (we’re offered tanks with either 200, 232 or 300 bars)
    - it’s funny that they might really put a stamp in the bottleneck according to the valve, which after all is the reeeeeaal bottleneck. Almost ironic
    Another thing what kind of bothers me is the designation of tanks:
    The effective volume of gas in the tank depends directly on the pressure. That means 80 cft or 2264 liters is only related to 2960 psi or 204 bars in a 11,1 liter tank. You can do the maths yourself and find some errors not only because I left out the decimals 😂, but it’s really confusing.
    Rise the pressure by one third and a 80 cft tank transforms to a 106 cft tank.
    In my opinion, clear technical facts are always best, such as:
    - volume in liters
    - maximum pressure capability
    So you have your SPG to calculate the effective amount of gas inside the tank. Just to keep things simple.
    Sorry, I wrote way to much, when all I wanted to say is THANKS 😂😂😂😂

    • @zimt1
      @zimt1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      DIN _ Deutsches Institut für Normung (German Institut for Standardization), has nothing to do with industry

    • @christianbauer1430
      @christianbauer1430 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      zimt1 Hey 👋. Thanks for the hint. I didn’t realize that they actually founded an association out of it back in 2017. So the name changed once again on 22nd of December 2017 from what I said was correct to what you say is indeed correct 😆. We always have to see the whole story I guess. Maybe the name stays like that now and forever.
      But still... we can’t forget, what it came from and that’s factually industrial standardization. Many manufacturers turned into industries. All the simplification, cost reduction and mass production came from industrialization in the first place. So the term „NORM“ will always be directly related to industries.

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Absolutely correct, I was close though.
      Alec

  • @mechanikos84
    @mechanikos84 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've been at home with a broken shoulder for a while and watched your videos. My shoulder is fine now and i still watch your videos. Thank you so much for each and every one of them. You and Kevin are great! You guys have helped me trough a tough time. Thank you!!!!
    About this vid:
    Again very well told, and much appreciated. But why do you seem to lean towards the old, lesser performing system? You're mostly progressive, going with modern tech in all your other vids, and sometimes even laugh (and have me laughing along) at the old ways, whilst still showing respect for the ways it had to be done back then.
    I've been around the world diving, and learned on yokes, and used them on most rental gear, for most of my dives. But now that time has come to get my own, i didn't give yoke any thought at all, thanks in part to your vids.
    In my opinion, DIN should be the standard for all first stages, and yoke converters should be supplied untill yoke-only-tanks and their valves have all been scrapped. I don't want to sound harsh, but yoke is no way forward. We don't have J-valves anymore, even though half the world used them at some point. I have to respectfully disagree with you, in my opinion DIN is better.
    Thank you very much for all your efforts on youtube.
    Mechanikos

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for your comments J&M.
      And I appreciate what you are saying but, it's a bit like telling the British that right-hand drive is archaic and obsolete so they should change over like the rest of the world.
      Yoke is fine. DIN is fine. The choice is based on your diving needs.
      Alec

    • @mechanikos84
      @mechanikos84 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter Well said and much appreciated. Liking your own gear is nice part of scuba too, right?
      Again, thank you for all of your vids. They really help me, and probably others, with picking gear, and the're enjoyable as well.
      B.t.w. do we ever get to Kevin on screen?

  • @SammyPsk
    @SammyPsk 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I never see Yoke regs here in slovakia. All of our LDS use DINs :D so when i first saw yoke i was confused... but honestly, it doesnt matter to me what you are using if you can manage an "emergency" situation underwater. unless we go cavediving together, then i need to know what you are using :D
    Thanks alec! You make me smarter and smarter every video

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks for watching Sammy.
      If you pick up even one little idea or if I make you smile, my life is complete!
      Take care.
      Alec

  • @boobear5272
    @boobear5272 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    anyway.. thanks for the explanation mr peirce, now im quite certain to get the DIN first stage as im planning on doing cave diving in the future

  • @scubamystic8860
    @scubamystic8860 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks, great video!

  • @znakecharm
    @znakecharm 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Good or better - Well.
    You're of course right - you should be careful using the word "better". However ...
    I know that YOKE has been there forever - and that it is a well tested technology, but here is my 50 cents.
    1. Yes, as you mention in the video - DIN is approved for higher pressure. If you want to take advantage of that - DIN is not better - it's the only option.
    2. With the YOKE system - the O-ring is part of the tank valve This means that when you're on a diving boat and using air supplied by the boat, every time you mount your regulator for the next dive - you need to inspect the o-ring for damage, wear, cracks, etc. And every time you change you have to check carefully. You do not however stand there on the boat and pry out the O-ring to check for cracks on the back and so on - but you should - shouldn't you? After all - this is the system that keeps you alive under water.
    3. With the DIN system - the O-ring is mounted on your regulator - it's yours (given of course that you're diving with your own regulator). If you have just recently changed and lubricated your O-ring, no one else has been using or abusing it, no Open Water Student has 30 minutes ago misplaced his regulator and damaged the valve O-ring, you can be pretty confident that your O-ring is okay. At least you know that it's not 3 years old dried out rubber. Of course you always check before mounting your regulator, but you know its history. Problem here of course being that the diving boat probably don't supply tanks with DIN valves :-(
    4. Space. I dive with a Mares MR12ST 1st stage, which has the yoke screw on the end of the 1st stage cylinder. Most of the time my regulator kit is placed in a regulator bag and occasionally its taken out and used for diving, but lets face it - most of the time it's being stored somewhere. Now, I travel with at least my Reg and my computer - the rest I can rent. I just came home from Thailand where I had my luggage in a backpack.And to be honest - trying to fit that regulator bag into the backpack with that darn YOKE pointing out in a completely different direction is just a pain. I know this is not a technical issue - but it sure is a practical one.
    So - I would definitely say that having a DIN regulator and a YOKE adapter gives you the best possibilities as you can use your reg for EVERY situation, be that high pressure, space savings, trust in your life-saving O-ring, and so on.
    Maybe DIN isn't better, maybe DIN is a german/european standard and not US, but then again - what gives you the most options ?
    So yes - I have recently ordered a DIN conversion kit for my MR12ST 1st stage.

    • @ALwinDigital
      @ALwinDigital 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      DIN does have safety advantages. The greater pressure capacity can reduce the risk of a rupture in case of overfilling when the tanks are attached to a compressor. Since the O-ring in a DIN is in the regulator, rather than on the exterior of the valve as in the yoke, it’s less likely to be lost or damaged during transport. Tests have also shown the DIN to be more resilient to impact compared to a yoke, which can be knocked off, though it may be an unlikely, but not impossible, scenario.

  • @3vg3vg
    @3vg3vg 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    great explanation thank you

  • @johnnyf4r
    @johnnyf4r 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks again Alec

  • @tayguarapereira5459
    @tayguarapereira5459 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello Alec.
    Another great vídeo and Always clarifying some questions we have. I just wished you had talked about diference between DIN 200 and DIN 300 and the conflicts with adapters, limitations on using one and another. Maybe you can add that topic to one of you next vídeos.
    Cheers.

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Boy, there's lots more about yokes and DINs bt I have to keep the videos reasonable. Maybe I'll re-visit the topic.
      Thanks for watching. Alec

    • @alaind831
      @alaind831 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      maybe a simple mention that not all DIN tanks can take a yoke insert retrofit (only shorter DIN200 ones) would have been useful as older DIN cannot...

  • @trentspencer7991
    @trentspencer7991 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video thanks

  • @Laterider4
    @Laterider4 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ah, I just had my new 1st stage converted to YOKE as it came with a DIN as standard.
    My thinking was that every boat I went on in Egypt all used YOKE on Ali cylinders so the cylinders I'm guessing would only be filled near 232 bar anyways.
    So if I ever come across a DIN cylinder valve .... Id check pressure inside was suitable for YOKE and put my own YOKE insert into the DIN threaded opening .
    All I need to carry is the little DIN to YOKE adapter and an Allen key , which is smaller than carrying the bigger converter to go on a DIN first stage to make it YOKE compatible .
    The Yoke fitting has been around for years so until I feel I need more pressure ... jobs a gooden right ?
    thanks for the vid !

  • @iranicus
    @iranicus 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Got me one of the Apeks DIN to Yoke adapters for my Apeks DIN reg to use for the cylinders of the scuba club I'm part of which have DIN cylinders but they have the Yoke converter installed. Works a treat :>

  • @charleslagerbom8055
    @charleslagerbom8055 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks, good video!

  • @saadsalem4146
    @saadsalem4146 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the info

  • @JMKWORLDWIDE
    @JMKWORLDWIDE 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love your videos! Qucik question, we are pretty new to diving and go your new DIN regulators (MK25) and wanted to be clear on something. If it can handle more BARs of pressure, that would mean more air capaicity in the tank correct? If not what is the difference between lower and higher pressures?

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      DIN regs are rated for 200 and 300 bar or standard vs high pressure tanks. Higher pressure may mean more capacity but also depends on tank size (eg a 12L vs 15L tank). Hope this helps John.

  • @azymasger9088
    @azymasger9088 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Scuba Genius @Alec

  • @fiona4777
    @fiona4777 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like the idea that putting insert in to make din valve to yoke valve. Sees cheaper and easier ?

  • @laminar0886
    @laminar0886 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi Alec.. we’re currently on a dive trip with our new DIN regulators. We chose DIN as the basis for the first stage for several reasons, but we do have yoke adaptors. We’ve found that it’s very difficult to screw the DIN fitting into the rental tanks they have here (they are very well used for sure). Maybe one out of three to four tanks attach well. What advice do you have to help us fit the DIN regulators? I don’t think lubricants are the answer, but appreciate any advice. Worst case, we can abandon DIN while here and just switch to yoke with our adaptors. But we’d like to make the DIN work if able. Thanks!

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Hard turning a DIN means the tank threads have likely been bashed around (sorry, aggressively handled). It's the one negative with rental tanks and DIN's I know of. As long as you can hand tighten the DIN fully into the tank, its OK to use as the o-ring is in the end of the tank. If no air leaks, should be good. Never use a tool to force a DIN onto a tank, that's when your good gear gets damaged by the bad rental gear. Should the threading be more than hand tight, skip DIN and go yoke for the trip. Saves damaging your threads and you're there for fun not stress. Take care and thanks for watching.
      A

  • @pricediver
    @pricediver 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great explanation Alec!! There is something I found very interesting, maybe it will help some others divers too!! So, I have a 300 bar din reg, and one time I tried to screw into a 232 bar tank valve, but I couldn’t screw all the way, I was very confused. It turns out that if you have a 300 bar din reg, you can use it with a 232 din valve or a 300 din tank valve. BUT it is not safe to use a 232 din reg with a 300 din tank valve. It turns out the best way to do it, is to use a din to yoke adaptor(232 bar) and use on any yoke valve, plus use it with din value( without the adapter of course), best travel friendly option. My only concern is that, when I use my 300 bar reg with a 232 bar tank valve, the threads that doesn’t screw all the way in really bothers me, and it seems like it is not very secure. Can you address this issue ? Thank you :)

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Actually Price, it's pretty simple. Clear your mind of all the confusing details and start over.
      DIN tank valves come in 2 versions - 200bar or 300bar.
      The reason for the difference is obvious - the 200bar valve is for a tank with a pressure rating of 200bar while the 300bar valve is for the higher pressure 300bar tanks.
      Now, most late model regulators will come equipped with a 300bar DIN fitting. Earlier models came with a 200bar fitting. It's really academic since all regulator made in the last 25 years regulators will easily handle 300bar.
      So, to your dilemma, your 300bar regulator fitting will fit into either a 200bar or 300bar tank valve. That makes sense since a regulator designed for 300bar can safely be used in a 200bar tank.
      You've already noticed that a 200bar fitting will not screw into a 300bar valve and again the reason is sensible. You would not want a device that that is rated for 200bar to fit into a 300bar tank.
      The valves and valves are easy to tell apart. The 300bar has a longer thread so the shorter 200bar reg fitting will not bottom out and seal. The exposed threads are not an issue. The O-Ring on the bottom seals and at 200bar the threads that are inserted into the vale are more than enough to make it safe.
      I hope that clears it up. It's a good system and quite safe.
      Take care.
      Alec

    • @pricediver
      @pricediver 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Alec Peirce Scuba that make so much sense, tbh!! Thank you Alec ;)))

    • @bloodymarvelous4790
      @bloodymarvelous4790 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@pricediver There are no 232 bar DIN regulators. All DIN regulators can handle, and will fit a 300 bar DIN valve. The only difference is that you DIN regulator will screw all the way into a 300 bar DIN valve, and will stick out a little more on a 232 bar DIN valve.
      Only ring inserts will not fit a 300 bar DIN valve. They screw in too deep, and you can't clamp a Yoke connector to it, or you don't screw it in deep enough, and the valve will leak like an SOB.

  • @deecee3573
    @deecee3573 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    DIN stands for Duetsche Industrie Norm ,greets Dirk

  • @alaind831
    @alaind831 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I recall you talking about DIN200 vs DIN300 during some episode (side note) but I can't find it now... this should have really be mentioned here as it's so as simple as you make it sound, unless you have a modern valve and

  • @wallybrown9509
    @wallybrown9509 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    You know your stuff Alec

  • @yamatomusashi1412
    @yamatomusashi1412 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    very wise man

  • @theveryfirst
    @theveryfirst 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I would say most use din and din is standard. Deutsche Institut Norm. Din is safer and can handle more pressure. Europe, Asia and middle east use din. From experience I have seen a few people have issues with their leaky yoke setup. I for one prefer to bring my own o ring. Fresh and serviced. Accept your argument about "better" though. Having said that, for cold water diving here in Switzerland, yokes are banned. We need two valves for safety incase one freezes. No one here uses yokes here because they are not allowed.

  • @mdovideo1414
    @mdovideo1414 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    When I took my advanced open water course in the Florida keys I used a yoke valve with a 3500 psi 100cf aluminum tank

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Technically, the tank pressure was 3500psi, it ought to have been a DIN. But no harm done obviously.
      Alec

  • @oceanpacific886
    @oceanpacific886 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    DIN all the way baby!!

  • @johnthomas2070
    @johnthomas2070 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    You’re awesome thank you

  • @luismesagrave
    @luismesagrave 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the great videos with such a fresh style, and for sharing your experience! It's like having a nice relaxed chat with someone that knows A LOT :)). Nice! By the way, in Europe, at least in Spain, I've seen both DIN and yoke ("international" is what yoke's called in Spain/Spanish) when renting tanks, probably even more yoke than DIN I'd say... except when the business is run by Germans ;P.
    Also, even when yoke is good enough, I think it's fair to say that DIN system is probably safer, plus it's much easier to change to yoke in case of need. So, getting a DIN+adapter seems to be a safer, more flexible choice when considering to buy a 1st stage... so I wouldn't consider getting a yoke reg anyway... Keep going with the videos! They are awesome!!

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks for your comments Luis.
      I suppose I agree with your sentiments about DIN vs yoke (and about Germans! I can say that since my mom was German).
      In North America and most areas (hence International??) the yoke is all you see so despite the possible advantages of DIN, the yoke is not about to disappear.
      Alec

    • @luismesagrave
      @luismesagrave 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter Yes, international as it's more widely spread... and DIN stands for Deutsche Industrie Norm, the german national standard organization... that's why germans do use it all the time :))

  • @schizer
    @schizer 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    "DIN stands for ... douche.." I LOLed. That's why you're awesome Mr Peirce! Greetings from Singapore =)

  • @amcaesar
    @amcaesar 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is deep! Inside baseball!

  • @kroiii2665
    @kroiii2665 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you !

  • @Owen9975
    @Owen9975 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi - what is your view of the latest regulators which automatically seal themselves when not under pressure ? Is the sealing reliable ?

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Several big companies have introduced that mechanism over the years, It's not a new nor novel idea at all. So far, no one have found a system that works perfectly. Oceanic had a simple system but it had some reliability problems and has been discontinued. US Divers has a similar system but it's considerably more complicated (more parts). We'll have to wait to see how it measures up.
      There is just no better way to keep water out of your regulator than good diver practices. Even with a sealing system in place, a sloppy diver will have problems so I'm not sure if it's worth pursuing an automatic seal system. I suppose it's like an automatic directional system on a car that will start your turn signals when you decide to turn a corner or maybe when your GPS tells you to turn up ahead. Great idea, not inconceivable, but certainly prone to problems because of sloppy drivers.
      Alec

  • @manolis8636
    @manolis8636 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Alec. You make things look easy. Question, I found a new Scubapro MK21 Regulator at a good price, but it's a DIN. If I put the DIN to TIN Adapter it would be forever since I dive in Cozumel. Wouldn't it damage it? your advice is very important. Thank you.

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Most tanks in Cozumel have convertible tank valves for DIN and yoke as many divers come from North America and Europe. Just ask your diving provider to confirm convertible tanks inserts. Should not need a DIN to yoke converter in Cozumel.
      A.

    • @OnlyKaerius
      @OnlyKaerius ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter True for the most part, but I did get use out of my DIN to yoke converter when I was diving there, not all every tank is convertible, there are indeed yoke tank rentals in Cozumel as well, and most dive shops source their tanks from the same tank rental company(as far as I know only one dive shop on the island actually has its own compressors, and they're the islands' tech dive shop, and even they also use the rental tank company for rec tanks).

  • @convergingsystemsinc.7001
    @convergingsystemsinc.7001 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video on Din. I bought a DIN regulator and am buying a DIN to yoke adapter as recommended by you to use with various K value tanks. As you mention that adapter adds another two inches (toward the back of your head) through the conversion process. What do you think about turning the tank 180 degrees and then mounting the regulator/adapter combination facing away from the head and then re-positioning all the hoses to their appropriate position?

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's a lot of fussing around to eliminate a problem that may not even exist. Do you bang your head on the regulator regularly? If so, give it a try.
      If not, quit worrying and have fun.
      Alec

    • @convergingsystemsinc.7001
      @convergingsystemsinc.7001 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Only occasionally. Maybe I will re-position the tank a bit. But conceptually there is nothing wrong with this approach, is there?

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nope. You can mount the reg any way you want, whatever works for you.
      You might get some funny looks but maybe, like me, you get funny looks anyway.
      Alec

  • @kornkitkitsomsub2283
    @kornkitkitsomsub2283 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Alec :) Thank you for all the vids! I'm looking to purchase a regulator with a first stage. I plan to be diving either in Asia or in North America, but might occasionally be diving in Europe. Would you recommend a DIN first stage + converter? I've heard that there may be problems using a converter. Also saw a comment about different DIN first stages. Could you possibly make a video about it in the future? Thanks!

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      I did a video about the DIN converter.
      If you plan to dive where DIN is common I suggest you convert your reg to a DIN fitting.
      Then get a spin-on converter for when you're diving in yoke country.
      I know of no problems with this setup, a DIN reg with a yoke converter, if the components are in good shape and the installation is proper.
      Good luck.
      Alec

    • @kornkitkitsomsub2283
      @kornkitkitsomsub2283 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you, Alec! Appreciate the comment! :) Have a wonderful day!!

  • @Laterider4
    @Laterider4 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm currently working on a screw on yoke .... I got this ! Haha

  • @chrishiggins8875
    @chrishiggins8875 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am learning tec and side mount so I am going to DIN. For me it is not just about the high pressure but about knobs and entanglements.
    The DIN takes up less space and when searching for shutoff it much simpler in stressful situations also there is nothing protruding on the yoke side of the tank. In side-mount if you go valves up there is nothing to scrape or get caught if a line runs across the bottom of tank.

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Good thoughts Chris. Any equipment configuration must be suited to the dive and diver.
      Alec

  • @fin313
    @fin313 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nicely done, sir. Very informative & frankly highly entertaining!
    So, to be clear--DIN to yoke conversion on 1st stage can be performed by diver, whereas you suggest a first-stage yoke to DIN conversion be performed by a dive equipment technician? (Generally speaking, of course. All for entertainment purposes).

  • @zahirulhafiz8065
    @zahirulhafiz8065 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good day Mr. Alec. On the case where i want to buy the din to yoke adaptor, can i buy any brand of adaptor or do i stick with same the brand as my regulator? Will there be any compatibility issues? Thank you sir

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      In North America, the yoke is standard (meaning no variations). The DIN has 2 options, normal and high pressure tanks. Normal DIN have 5 threads and the High Pressure DIN tanks have 7 threads. So a yoke to DIN is very common with no compatibility issues for regular tanks. Your store should confirm the DIN threads for the type of tanks your using. Good luck.

    • @bloodymarvelous4790
      @bloodymarvelous4790 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A DIN to Yoke adapter is just a hunk of metal. There are no compatibility issues. The adapter screws on to your DIN regulator, and you then clamp it over a Yoke valve. Any brand adapter will fit any brand DIN regulator.

  • @matijakovacic1730
    @matijakovacic1730 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Interesting - one would argue DIN actually IS better in every way then International. Its more compact, lighter, supports more pressure and probably most importantly - its much more sturdy - drop the bottle on a DIN 1st stage, no worries - drop it on the yoke valve, you might have trouble.

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You list valid considerations but the #1 reason is higher tank pressures. Both work well so it's up to the diver what works better for them. Thanks for sharing Matija.

    • @matijakovacic1730
      @matijakovacic1730 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter Thank you for providing heaps of great SCUBA information to the wide world! Your knowledge and manner of sharing are both much appreciated!
      Concerning DIN/international - one could argue yoke types big advantage is just how widespread it is. One would be better of counting on it beeing used wherever he goes diving.

  • @miigwi
    @miigwi 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Isn't DIN also more safe when it comes to diving cold water (due to possible air leakage caused by o-rings of the yoke valve)? At least that was what we were told when diving in Iceland's 1°C water. And out of curiosity: are there tec divers with yoke regulators?

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      A poorly maintained O-Ring will breakdown and leak. That's for sure.
      However, to compare a DIN valve to a poorly maintained yoke valve is hardly fair.
      A yoke valve in good condition with a fresh O-Ring is no more likely to leak that a DIN valve.
      A DIN valve is much more susceptible to permanent damage from even a light hit on the top. It crushes very easily. I've seen many of them. But I wouldn't say that DINs are bad because of that.
      ALL tech divers started on yoke (in North America anyway). Most use DIN but for a variety of reasons - not necessarily safety.
      Alec

  • @DB-yj3qc
    @DB-yj3qc 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I only had DIN valve tanks other than my pony tank. I liked that I'd only take 1 on 2 tank dive boat trip and still have more air left when I was actively diving. 😒 I sold off my 2 hi pressure steel tanks and just kept my AL tanks. I'll miss having them no weight belt needed most of the time. I was able to dive with my drysuit without any lead. Probably not now.
    I'm trying to get back diving now.... Many life changes.

  • @MrRagool
    @MrRagool 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just saw another video that mentioned 300bar DIN valves have 7 threads vs 5 on those limited to 230 bar… so if I buy a 300bar rated DIN regulator will ai be able to use it with a regular tank after the yoke adapter is removed?

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If the tank valve is also rated at 300 bar, then it should mate properly to a 300 bar reg.
      A.

    • @OnlyKaerius
      @OnlyKaerius ปีที่แล้ว +2

      300 Bar DIN regulators will fit on all* DIN valves.
      The limited 232 bar DIN regulators won't fit on 300 bar DIN valves, but 300 bar DIN regulators will fit on 232 bar DIN valves.
      *scuba diving. There's another DIN threading type that is only for medical oxygen tanks, and won't fit a scuba regulator.

  • @griffinharris2319
    @griffinharris2319 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have the Scuba Pro MK25. Does it matter which way I have it oriented on the tank such as the low pressure tubes above the high pressure tubes for performance wise?

    • @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter
      @AlecPeirceScuba_SeaHunter  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Look at my video S03E12, 1st Stage Hose Setup, to see the pro/cons of mounting the 1st stage normal or reversed (hint, not a problem).
      Alec

    • @bloodymarvelous4790
      @bloodymarvelous4790 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can even have the valve point sideways, mount the regulator at 90 degrees, and use it as spoke. Not sure why you would want to, but you can. Regulator orientation doesn't hinder its performance. There's pressure on all sides of the regulator, not just the top or bottom.