Brother Jason, you are awesome. Thank you for pointing out, emphasizing the importance of Genesis. So many today are trying to "go on" without it, accepting the lie that it is outmoded, passe. It's always refreshing to hear you speak. Thank you my brother.
Lisle is a con man lying for Jesus. That is it. He does no research whatsoever on his claims and submits nothing to the scientific community for critical review. He presents his nonsense to fundamentalist churches who subscribe to this ridiculous literalism. Even other Christian denominations distance themselves from this bs.
It isn't a "claim". It is fact. It is Lisle who makes claims. Claims that he does not offer up any evidence or calculations for other than his interpretation of a compilation of myth stories and faith stories written by goat herders and religious leaders. If Lisle was confident in his claims, he would follow through and offer all his data, analysis, calculations and experiments to the scientific community for review. He does not. Instead he goes on his little lecture circuit for a fee to fundamentalist churches and summer camps. Because he knows that audience is gullible and willing to "give" to his ministry. It is you who is pathetic for believing his drivel.
Macroevolution describes major evolutionary change. The term applies mainly to the evolution of whole taxonomic groups over long periods of time. It is well understood and we know this through both the fossil records and DNA analysis. Yes it is part of the scientific theory of evolution. Specifically in scientific terms, a Scientific Theory is an explanation of the facts. Learn some basic science instead of watch dimwits like this guy.
How can God be glorified by saving me from my self destructive sin, freeing me from enslavement to my own desires for soul destroying sin, if I had never been enslaved to myself. I would have never understood the power of His grace and what a gift faith really is.
I love how trolls come on here and assert creation is not true with no evidence. They just demonstrate their ignorance and lack of logic. Proving that it is hatred of God that lies underneath their objection. It is not reason that turns men to evolution.
While you're praising Jesus, ask him to explain how the light from a galaxy 13.4 BILLION light years away can reach the Earth if the Earth and Universe are only 5000 years old. That light would take 13.4 BILLION YEARS to reach Earth. If the Universe is only 5000 years old, this is an IMPOSSIBILITY. If you read Creation, "the stars" (aka the Universe) were supposedly created the same week that the Earth was created. So....nothing in the Universe can be older than 5000 years....which is CLEARLY INCORRECT, as proven by 13.4 BILLION YEAR OLD photons. I predict stony silence from the Man from Nazareth when you ask him THIS question :)
easy god made things that way. he didnt put baby animals and plants first. he added full grown things. he made the light from stars close enuff for us to see it and enjoy. no one knows the speed the light much less how its affected in space. 13.4 billion year old photon hahahaha wow and you think i'm taking a giant leap. Evolution has been debunked so hard it's unreal. Academia no longer believes in it either.
Dr. Jason Lisle has actually done significant work on this alleged problem of distant light. Here's an astronomy talk of his that starts talking about that question at 44:44 : th-cam.com/video/bEejUyEyhhg/w-d-xo.html . He has defended this view in debate with Dr. Hugh Ross at Southern Evangelical's Seminary at their 2013 National Conference on Christian Apologetics as well, and there used to be a TH-cam video of it. However, I currently cannot find it.
Zac Story No he hasn't. He makes crap up to sell to the scientifically illiterate at fundamentalist churches through the con game ministry he is associated with. He runs a convincing con to someone who doesn't understand BASIC science. He has NEVER submitted anything EVER to the scientific community in terms of analysis, experiment, data, calculations supporting his claims. EVER! People also have "youtube" videos about shape shifting aliens controlling the government, flat earth, expanding earth and all kinds of other nonsense. That is the only audience they have since they cannot support their claims with evidence and subject their work to the scrutiny of others who are actually experts in the various fields.
lol NO HE HASNT durrrrrr. He (Zac) proved you wrong and your still in denial and lazy. Where's your evidence? Have you ever submitted anything to the scientific community? Are you a christian scholar? If not then how can you comment on it by your logic? Again where's your proof of your claims? To lazy to provide anything. Hardened your heart to the point you lost logic. Stop the hate and try Jesus.
Does anyone know how old Dr. Lisle is? I've searched repeatedly and cannot find anything. I've read many sites stating that he received his PHD from Ohio Wesleyan University but they don't give a graduation date. I would like to attend one of his seminars but it seems most creation science speakers are concentrated in the west. His Christmas star seminars are awesome.
@@joeiiiful Actually I found it. Seems he was born in 1950. That sounds about right because I noticed that in many of his videos he looks extremely young then I saw some where he looked much older even though he is a young-looking guy. Thanks anyway.
7:00 - "And that's a GREAT HONOR." - Jason Lisle th-cam.com/video/1nWOa-n5lK4/w-d-xo.htmlm00s 0:00 - Creation Evangelism - Discussing the importance of Genesis in evangelism. - Jason Lisle th-cam.com/video/1nWOa-n5lK4/w-d-xo.html 11/30/18 #Netfriending SHOW TOPIC:
He's an Astrophysicist by education, via secular colleges. He's not stupid....his adherents are. He preys upon you because he's a con-man more interested in selling you his books and video discs than anything. Watch this guy. He relentlessly peddles his wares on his little speaking tours because it pays his bills.
Uh I think he could be making far more $$$ doing something else. He's doing this because he sincerely believes in it, and he believes he is being obedient to God.
DISCOVER and understand the DIFFERENCE between "LIFE The Real Self", and the human PRIMATE. "LIFE The Real Self" is "The LIGHT of MAN", which is "The LIFE of GOD" ! Period. Read "The Gospel According to John", Chapter 1 Verses 1 to 13....
Enjoy most your videos, BUT not everyone was lucky/blessed enough to be raised in a loving Christian home. Also you too have sinned, even if you come across as though you haven't...
Unfortunately, his peers subscribe to the religion of naturalism and are unwilling to look at the scientific evidence as it is. Almost all the "Theories" we are taught in school have huge errors in them that we are never taught, we are given the theories as proven fact. The omission of facts is a lie. Great example, and you can research this for yourself, accretion of planets from dust, but physics says that once you get to the size of small pebbles that instead of clumping together, they have to much mass and speed and will actually hit each other and be destroyed in the process. So no matter how much time you have, planets should never have formed, and that his Physics 101. And those that propose the theory of accretion of planets from dust, even admit that they can not find a way past this issue and that they have faith one day someone will find the answer. But it would be a violation of Newton's first law. This single issue kills the theory of accretion of planets from dust. So now what?
vol man isn't helping with his reply, but your initial comment is still fallacious, as is your reply. He is not "attempting to say that all of his peers are deluded morons". He is simply stating that their INTERPRETATIONS of the data are based on presupposed axioms based on their worldview. You can learn facts at university, but a fact being true doesn't mean the interpretation is true. Evolutionists and creationists both have the same facts. Dr. Lisle is taking the facts, and pointing out the problems and fallacies in evolutionary interpretations.
Unfortunately it doesn't work that way. A 'worldview' falls apart when one has to perform applied science. Any dumbshit can look at a book or a scientific paper and say 'nuh uh'. But ultimately when you have to refine oil into gas or start your car, it's only going to work one way. You certainly aren't going to get that with prayer. The entire 'worldview' argument relies on the LACK of application of science. It means that you guys want to armchair quarterback how the world works, and not actually 'do' anything.
5 ปีที่แล้ว
The lie of creationism including Intelligent Design, cannot be asserted or defended honestly
His only "intolerance" is to illogical, irrational, fallacious arguments, and that is something EVERYONE should be intolerant of. If everyone understood laws of logic, they'd see that 90% of political debates are all fallacies. But since you are guilty of an ad hominem attack following that, you must not. You are attacking him as being "uneducated". Well, as you pointed out, he earned his Ph.D from a secular university, so you can't claim they are biased towards his views, and you don't earn a Ph.D from being "uneducated". So, your argument is really arguing not that he is uneducated, but that he isn't indoctrinated by evolutionary theory. But, not only IS he educated enough to fully understand it, he is educated AND logical/rational enough to see and acknowledge all of the flaws. This is unlike evolutionists such as Richard Lewontin, who said: "Our willingness to accept scientific claims that are AGAINST COMMON SENSE is the key to an understanding of the real struggle between science and the supernatural. We take the side of science IN SPITE of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, IN SPITE of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, IN SPITE of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our A PRIORI adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is absolute, for we cannot ALLOW a Divine Foot in the door." Or, how about Dr. Todd Scott: "Even if ALL the data point to an intelligent designer, such an hypothesis is excluded from science because it is not naturalistic." They aren't trying to educate; they're trying to indoctrinate. So who is really being intolerant and uneducated?
Nonsense. Jason Lisle, barring a few isolated arguments relating to his expertise, continually speaks on topics he is NOT educated about. Biology, Geology, Biochemistry, Chemistry, etc etc. 'Uneducated'. Trust me, when someone like Lisle goes through an undergrad and then later a graduate program in Astrophysics, there's little or no time to even self-educate on these other areas. His focus is primarily on mechanics of stellar bodies, cosmology, and so on. He's functionally an idiot when it comes to anything else. The LAST person you'd want to have doing speaking tours about Evolution or Geology.
Truth is truth, and wisdom is the logical use of right knowledge. You're a functional idiot for not recognizing it when it right in front of your eyes.
In the many years since he received his PhD in Astrophysics Dr Lisle has had plenty of time to read deeply in the areas of biology, geology, chemistry, et al, and to discuss issues related to them with fellow scientists who are degreed in those fields, so he is quite knowledgeable in those areas. Are you critical of evolutionists who speak outside of their degree field? Many of them make pronouncements in areas they have not formally studied.
Yes i notice this too, that satan is the "god" of this fallen world. But Jason meant something else in his context :) He meant that Jesus is King of Earth.
The Law is a curse and was introduced so that sin would increased. We, the Body of Christ, are not saved by observing the Law. On the contrary...if we attempt to earn our salvation by observing the Law, we make void the power of the cross. Jesus was sent ONLY to the house of Israel and the Twelve were instructed to do the same. Our gospel was delivered to the apostle Paul on the road to Damascus by the already-murdered Jesus Christ. This gospel is quite contrary to the kingdom gospel preached by the earthly Jesus and the Twelve. Th e kigdom gospel, where Jews were saved by keepjng the Law and over 600 precepts, including water baptism, was rejected by the Jews and now Israel's promises are held in abbeyance until the fullness of the Gentles comes in. Love you Jason but you allowed school to get in the way of your education.
@@gregb6469 You are very kind and gracious. Dispensationalism in any of its forms is pure and simple Heresy. It is a system that was invented by JN Darby and popularized by CI Schofield and his garbage reference Bible.
![ตีสิบเดย์ [FULL] | ครอบครัวสะท้านทุ่ง "นางบี & อ้ายสติ๊ก"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/A1rhYcxxNtA/mqdefault.jpg)
Thank you for your right teaching Dr. Lisle!
Brother Jason, you are awesome. Thank you for pointing out, emphasizing the importance of Genesis. So many today are trying to "go on" without it, accepting the lie that it is outmoded, passe. It's always refreshing to hear you speak. Thank you my brother.
Lisle is a con man lying for Jesus. That is it. He does no research whatsoever on his claims and submits nothing to the scientific community for critical review. He presents his nonsense to fundamentalist churches who subscribe to this ridiculous literalism. Even other Christian denominations distance themselves from this bs.
Your claims are so ridiculous it's pathetic.
It isn't a "claim". It is fact. It is Lisle who makes claims. Claims that he does not offer up any evidence or calculations for other than his interpretation of a compilation of myth stories and faith stories written by goat herders and religious leaders.
If Lisle was confident in his claims, he would follow through and offer all his data, analysis, calculations and experiments to the scientific community for review. He does not. Instead he goes on his little lecture circuit for a fee to fundamentalist churches and summer camps. Because he knows that audience is gullible and willing to "give" to his ministry.
It is you who is pathetic for believing his drivel.
At best, macro evolution is a theory; a model. Macro evolution cannot be proven scientifically; therefore it remains a theory; nothing more.
Macroevolution describes major evolutionary change. The term applies mainly to the evolution of whole taxonomic groups over long periods of time. It is well understood and we know this through both the fossil records and DNA analysis.
Yes it is part of the scientific theory of evolution. Specifically in scientific terms, a Scientific Theory is an explanation of the facts. Learn some basic science instead of watch dimwits like this guy.
How can God be glorified by saving me from my self destructive sin, freeing me from enslavement to my own desires for soul destroying sin, if I had never been enslaved to myself.
I would have never understood the power of His grace and what a gift faith really is.
Keep up the good work, Jason.
I love how trolls come on here and assert creation is not true with no evidence. They just demonstrate their ignorance and lack of logic.
Proving that it is hatred of God that lies underneath their objection. It is not reason that turns men to evolution.
God bless Jason! We have God’s word we need to stand on its authority and preach it to everyone.
Thanks Dr Lisle it seems as though you have a nice following all ready..
Dr Jason Lisle is the 🐐
Thank you for making it so easy for the rest of us to understand how to help God save others. 🙏
I’ll likely watch this one more than once. 😊
great video with some great points,thx Praise Jesus!
While you're praising Jesus, ask him to explain how the light from a galaxy 13.4 BILLION light years away can reach the Earth if the Earth and Universe are only 5000 years old. That light would take 13.4 BILLION YEARS to reach Earth. If the Universe is only 5000 years old, this is an IMPOSSIBILITY. If you read Creation, "the stars" (aka the Universe) were supposedly created the same week that the Earth was created. So....nothing in the Universe can be older than 5000 years....which is CLEARLY INCORRECT, as proven by 13.4 BILLION YEAR OLD photons. I predict stony silence from the Man from Nazareth when you ask him THIS question :)
easy god made things that way. he didnt put baby animals and plants first. he added full grown things. he made the light from stars close enuff for us to see it and enjoy. no one knows the speed the light much less how its affected in space. 13.4 billion year old photon hahahaha wow and you think i'm taking a giant leap. Evolution has been debunked so hard it's unreal. Academia no longer believes in it either.
Dr. Jason Lisle has actually done significant work on this alleged problem of distant light. Here's an astronomy talk of his that starts talking about that question at 44:44 : th-cam.com/video/bEejUyEyhhg/w-d-xo.html . He has defended this view in debate with Dr. Hugh Ross at Southern Evangelical's Seminary at their 2013 National Conference on Christian Apologetics as well, and there used to be a TH-cam video of it. However, I currently cannot find it.
Zac Story No he hasn't. He makes crap up to sell to the scientifically illiterate at fundamentalist churches through the con game ministry he is associated with. He runs a convincing con to someone who doesn't understand BASIC science. He has NEVER submitted anything EVER to the scientific community in terms of analysis, experiment, data, calculations supporting his claims. EVER! People also have "youtube" videos about shape shifting aliens controlling the government, flat earth, expanding earth and all kinds of other nonsense. That is the only audience they have since they cannot support their claims with evidence and subject their work to the scrutiny of others who are actually experts in the various fields.
lol NO HE HASNT durrrrrr. He (Zac) proved you wrong and your still in denial and lazy. Where's your evidence? Have you ever submitted anything to the scientific community? Are you a christian scholar? If not then how can you comment on it by your logic? Again where's your proof of your claims? To lazy to provide anything. Hardened your heart to the point you lost logic. Stop the hate and try Jesus.
thank you
Awesome
I do love how he occasionally lets slip that other Christians disagree with him....
Does anyone know how old Dr. Lisle is? I've searched repeatedly and cannot find anything. I've read many sites stating that he received his PHD from Ohio Wesleyan University but they don't give a graduation date.
I would like to attend one of his seminars but it seems most creation science speakers are concentrated in the west. His Christmas star seminars are awesome.
How is it that Dr Lisle is perhaps the only public figure in the world without a wikipedia page?
Rational-Wiki has an article on him. Apparently he was born in 1950, although he looks much younger.
@@rebekahloe1677 He does not look like a 70 year old man.
Thewordkeeper: Dr Lisle was born on December 10, 1974. He looks young because he is young.
@@joeiiiful Actually I found it. Seems he was born in 1950. That sounds about right because I noticed that in many of his videos he looks extremely young then I saw some where he looked much older even though he is a young-looking guy. Thanks anyway.
7:00 - "And that's a GREAT HONOR." - Jason Lisle
th-cam.com/video/1nWOa-n5lK4/w-d-xo.htmlm00s
0:00 - Creation Evangelism - Discussing the importance of Genesis in evangelism. -
Jason Lisle
th-cam.com/video/1nWOa-n5lK4/w-d-xo.html
11/30/18
#Netfriending SHOW TOPIC:
I love when people call Dr. Lisle stupid..hes an Astrologist. God forbid they open they're blind eyes
I think you mean 'Astronomer.' Astrology deals with signs in the stars, fortune telling, and the like.
He's an Astrophysicist by education, via secular colleges. He's not stupid....his adherents are. He preys upon you because he's a con-man more interested in selling you his books and video discs than anything. Watch this guy. He relentlessly peddles his wares on his little speaking tours because it pays his bills.
Uh I think he could be making far more $$$ doing something else. He's doing this because he sincerely believes in it, and he believes he is being obedient to God.
So does Dawkins.
Dawkins is being obedient to his own ego.
the Jews believed that messiah is political not spiritual. Ancient Greeks believed that gods punished humanity with death for disobedience
DISCOVER and understand the DIFFERENCE between "LIFE The Real Self", and the human PRIMATE.
"LIFE The Real Self" is "The LIGHT of MAN", which is "The LIFE of GOD" ! Period.
Read "The Gospel According to John", Chapter 1 Verses 1 to 13....
Cant you even see this is the wrong place for your silly pagan nonsense? 😑
Thank you, i am now an atheist
That'll happen when you're a moron.
Enjoy most your videos, BUT not everyone was lucky/blessed enough to be raised in a loving Christian home. Also you too have sinned, even if you come across as though you haven't...
We as humans are all born into sin. Accept your station in life and make the best of it.
Can't help the irony at 14:50 of that picture, because 'Dr' Lisle obtained his entire education at secular institutions, to include his PhD.
are you really this ignorant?
Not at all. While your reply isn't clarified, Lisle in the video is attempting to say that all of his peers are deluded morons. They aren't.
Unfortunately, his peers subscribe to the religion of naturalism and are unwilling to look at the scientific evidence as it is. Almost all the "Theories" we are taught in school have huge errors in them that we are never taught, we are given the theories as proven fact. The omission of facts is a lie. Great example, and you can research this for yourself, accretion of planets from dust, but physics says that once you get to the size of small pebbles that instead of clumping together, they have to much mass and speed and will actually hit each other and be destroyed in the process. So no matter how much time you have, planets should never have formed, and that his Physics 101. And those that propose the theory of accretion of planets from dust, even admit that they can not find a way past this issue and that they have faith one day someone will find the answer. But it would be a violation of Newton's first law. This single issue kills the theory of accretion of planets from dust. So now what?
vol man isn't helping with his reply, but your initial comment is still fallacious, as is your reply. He is not "attempting to say that all of his peers are deluded morons". He is simply stating that their INTERPRETATIONS of the data are based on presupposed axioms based on their worldview. You can learn facts at university, but a fact being true doesn't mean the interpretation is true. Evolutionists and creationists both have the same facts. Dr. Lisle is taking the facts, and pointing out the problems and fallacies in evolutionary interpretations.
Unfortunately it doesn't work that way. A 'worldview' falls apart when one has to perform applied science. Any dumbshit can look at a book or a scientific paper and say 'nuh uh'. But ultimately when you have to refine oil into gas or start your car, it's only going to work one way. You certainly aren't going to get that with prayer. The entire 'worldview' argument relies on the LACK of application of science. It means that you guys want to armchair quarterback how the world works, and not actually 'do' anything.
The lie of creationism including Intelligent Design, cannot be asserted or defended honestly
8:50 Could it be that your intolerance and uneducated views don't find wide acceptance? Like at 14:30?
His only "intolerance" is to illogical, irrational, fallacious arguments, and that is something EVERYONE should be intolerant of. If everyone understood laws of logic, they'd see that 90% of political debates are all fallacies. But since you are guilty of an ad hominem attack following that, you must not. You are attacking him as being "uneducated". Well, as you pointed out, he earned his Ph.D from a secular university, so you can't claim they are biased towards his views, and you don't earn a Ph.D from being "uneducated". So, your argument is really arguing not that he is uneducated, but that he isn't indoctrinated by evolutionary theory. But, not only IS he educated enough to fully understand it, he is educated AND logical/rational enough to see and acknowledge all of the flaws. This is unlike evolutionists such as Richard Lewontin, who said:
"Our willingness to accept scientific claims that are AGAINST COMMON SENSE is the key to an understanding of the real struggle between science and the supernatural. We take the side of science IN SPITE of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, IN SPITE of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, IN SPITE of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our A PRIORI adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is absolute, for we cannot ALLOW a Divine Foot in the door."
Or, how about Dr. Todd Scott:
"Even if ALL the data point to an intelligent designer, such an hypothesis is excluded from science because it is not naturalistic."
They aren't trying to educate; they're trying to indoctrinate. So who is really being intolerant and uneducated?
Nonsense. Jason Lisle, barring a few isolated arguments relating to his expertise, continually speaks on topics he is NOT educated about. Biology, Geology, Biochemistry, Chemistry, etc etc. 'Uneducated'. Trust me, when someone like Lisle goes through an undergrad and then later a graduate program in Astrophysics, there's little or no time to even self-educate on these other areas. His focus is primarily on mechanics of stellar bodies, cosmology, and so on. He's functionally an idiot when it comes to anything else. The LAST person you'd want to have doing speaking tours about Evolution or Geology.
Truth is truth, and wisdom is the logical use of right knowledge. You're a functional idiot for not recognizing it when it right in front of your eyes.
In the many years since he received his PhD in Astrophysics Dr Lisle has had plenty of time to read deeply in the areas of biology, geology, chemistry, et al, and to discuss issues related to them with fellow scientists who are degreed in those fields, so he is quite knowledgeable in those areas. Are you critical of evolutionists who speak outside of their degree field? Many of them make pronouncements in areas they have not formally studied.
@@davidbutler1857 Which one of these fields are you qualified to defend?
Jason Lisle...............FACEPALM!!
Completely wrong! Jesus is King of the new earth!
Yes i notice this too, that satan is the "god" of this fallen world. But Jason meant something else in his context :) He meant that Jesus is King of Earth.
Biblical Science.......an oxymoron if ever there was one.
The lie of creationism cannot be asserted or defended with honesty.
Gary the real troll! Ignore this dude, folks..He's just making his rounds...
I will correct your statement-- The lie of evolutionism cannot be asserted or defended with honesty.
No need to thank me.
The Law is a curse and was introduced so that sin would increased. We, the Body of Christ, are not saved by observing the Law. On the contrary...if we attempt to earn our salvation by observing the Law, we make void the power of the cross. Jesus was sent ONLY to the house of Israel and the Twelve were instructed to do the same. Our gospel was delivered to the apostle Paul on the road to Damascus by the already-murdered Jesus Christ. This gospel is quite contrary to the kingdom gospel preached by the earthly Jesus and the Twelve. Th e kigdom gospel, where Jews were saved by keepjng the Law and over 600 precepts, including water baptism, was rejected by the Jews and now Israel's promises are held in abbeyance until the fullness of the Gentles comes in.
Love you Jason but you allowed school to get in the way of your education.
Hyper-dispensationalism is an erroneous understanding of the Bible. I speak as a former hyper-dispensationalist.
@@gregb6469 You are very kind and gracious. Dispensationalism in any of its forms is pure and simple Heresy. It is a system that was invented by JN Darby and popularized by CI Schofield and his garbage reference Bible.