Our former prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayeeji wasn't a English speaking technocrat or belonging to any political dynasty. He was one of the best PM and honest politician of our country.
This foreigners doesn't know anything about India it's not their fault. Their mind is fully wased by so called western media, who is always intersted in showing negative side or image of India everytime whether it's relevant or irrelevant news. People like this who create videos always quotes western media reports, which is fully baised and the repoter who's writing article have many stereotypes regarding Sanatan Hindus. This results to Hinduphobia in their article which can clearly identifiable.
Because, What this tldr guy is telling is wrong, -"India's Growth is Average", Really?IMF says India is the World's Fastest Growing Major Economy and Global Economic Bright Spot as did not only had a very Strong Recovery growth of 8.7% in 2021-22, and 7% in 2022-23 despite Global Slowdown and Under Modi since 2014, India's Economy Overtook Russia, Brazil, France,Italy and the UK to become world's 5th Largest Economy and As predicted by 2028 to Overtake Germany and Japan to Join Top-3 Economic Powers of the World and India's Exports are also a Record of $ 770 Billion USD an increase of nearly 100 Billion from 2021 despite Global Slowdown and India is the World's 2nd largest Receiver of Foreign Direct Investments worth $ 83 billion USD only behind China in 2021, And India under Modi became a Digital Powerhouse with 42% of World's Digital Transactions worth $ 1.7 Trillion USD were from India up from Zero 6 years back and And India's Poverty has declined to 6% as reported by IMF which is less than The US or the UK and India has also Become Global Technological Powerhouse with world's 2nd Highest Startups, 3rd Highest Unicorns and Billionaires and 3rd Most leading in Future Critical Technologies including AI, Bio, Space and Quantum Computing as reported by ASPI
Still one can get behind a president that rides a motorcycle and wares leather jackets. It shows that he's more in touch with the world and closer to the every man than those corrupt suit wearing shells that we call career politicians.
4:12 I think it is insane when you realise that the leader of the 🇮🇳 World's Largest Democracy has one of the highest % approval ratings - in a democracy of a massive 1.4 Billion people (that's more than 3 x Triple the population of the next largest democracy of the 🇪🇺EU - and still it is not even a country)!!
@@hrishikeshmohite3602 that's all you have left to say. modi zombies cannot speak on substance just sound like chat GPT bots spouting the same phrases over and over.
I am an India and there are four main reasons for Modi's popularity 1) his no nonsence approach to defence and foreign policy. As you mentioned, the foreign policy of his government is widely loved in the country. It is not that India's foreign policy has changed drastically, we were balancing US and Russia before we are doing it now. But now we feel we have a voice, thanks in big part to our foreign minister S Jaishankar's firey speeches. Fir defence i don't think I need to say something. The two sergical strikes on Pakistan, the stability in Jammu and Kashmir, speak for themselves. 2) His infrastructure building approach. It is well known Indian infrastructure was in a miserable state a few years back. As you mentioned the pace of highway building has nearly tripled. But you did not mention the quality. The new highways are of very high quality challenging some in the western world. Also, the number of airports has nearly doubled, the pace of metro construction has more than tripled. The transformation of railways with new stations and new trains are all happening and everybody and see it. The number of industries is steadily increasing because of this infrastructure push so obviously he is popular because of this. 3) The stupid opposition. I just don't understand why the oppositions parties can't get their act together. Rahul Gandhi can not defeat modi, they need someone else but they somehow don't understand that. They don't talk about actual issues but are stuck on some which don't work. Everytime I think that they have now learnt and this is the step in right direction, they do something and go two step back. Add ti ut Modi's gigantic party machinery which never fails to highlight even the smallest achievement if their governments and you have what you see now. 4) no scams/corruption. The previous government was riddled with scams worth billions. In these nine years Modi has managed to urn the government without a single scam. This aspect is given much less credit than it deserves.
I agree with 1,2,3 point but I disagree with the 4 poin because I think previous congress party good in caching the corrupt people. It can be happening that modi government doing corruption but we did not finding it. On economic modi government did many blunder. Like demonetisation and gst why I saying gst because it's so world bank say that it's world most complicated tax system. Gst hase 5 slab anather country hase only one and two slab. Problem was that first 2 years before demonetisation we seeing higher than 8 percent growth rate and it's increasing but after that over growth rate plummeted to 6% and lower growth rate 2021 groth rate was rebound and it's depressing in 2022 and 2023.
@@alexseguin5245 I mean for a large country with underdeveloped infrastructure, tripling the highway building speed isn't as crazy We're going through what US went through during Eisenhower era
Three things I notice: 1) Almost all these leaders feel like they come from outside of the regular political class. What makes someone a member of the political class is no doubt different in different countries, but it’s still recognisable. 2) There’s a feeling that these leaders cut through bureaucratic obstruction and actually get things done. This is connected to the first point. In many countries, there’s a feeling that the permanent bureaucracy does its own thing, regardless of who’s nominally in charge of the government. If the bureaucrats don’t want a policy to succeed, they’ll throw lots of inertial obstruction in its path until a regular politician just gives up. But these leaders seem to be forcing through popular changes, overcoming that inertia. 3) Voters aren’t really ideological, and these leaders recognise this. They want simple, big things dealt with, like crime or bad infrastructure. They don’t care if that means adopting an apparently right wing approach on one issue and a left wing approach on another.
Yeah I was really surprised Sauli Niinistö wasn't on the list. Do they think that Finnish polling is not reliable, he doesn't have that high approval or they didn't even think about checking Finland?
@@justskip4595 Well the polling was ordered from an independent company by the Finnish state media. HE came in at 92% in December and I do think that is indeed the case. I don't personally know a single person who thinks that Sauli has done a bad job or isn't just overall excellent. They were even talking about allowing him to run for third term couple of years ago because they like him so god daam much.
@Zaydan Alfariz Marin has a bit of a mixed reputation, she's been involved with a quite few controversies as of late with the latest being about the F/A-18 Hornets. With the parliamentary elections under way Petteri Orpo and Riikka Purra have been more popular among voters.
@@priyadarshi8548 so what do you call the ethnicity of native Hindi speakers? Just like… 🇧🇩Bengali speakers = Bengalis 🇮🇳 Telugu speakers = Telugus 🇵🇰Urdu speakers = Urdus etc… so similarly what about Hindi speakers?
put Vajpayee on list of generation of politician that don't speak Hindi is ridiculous when he is very good speaker in Hindi. Also poet and very good by the way.
sadly he ruled only for about 7 years total and yes vajpayee still used english while on foregin visit and was not much of a populist leader. Though i personally consider him better than modi and manmohan singh
@@error144-k9l I talking about Hindi here and Vajpayee is better in Hindi also respect other language. On The Point of modi which is result of better social engineering and such outrage like people think he will eradicate Muslim.
I think atal Bihari Vajpayee is the only Indian leader who isn't hated by anyone, be it conservatives, liberals or centrists. Even pakistanis don't seem to hate him.
I'm surprised that approval rates just above the majority are the highest in the world. But yes, as an Australian I can confirm Albanese is a vast improvement over Scomo
@@artman12 Most people I know support Taiwan, myself included. I'm not sure what we can really do right now, except recognise them (which we should do) without it getting dangerous fast. If war does break out, we should help Taiwan ofc
@@artman12 He is not Pro-China, he is just sensibly not Publicly Anti-China for the political points like Morrison, Behind the Scenes logical moves are taken to ensure that there is as minimal safe risk from China as our country can reasonably achieve, such as continuing the nuclear sub deal. As for Taiwan basically the same, deal sure he could take on China and die on that hill alone, but again logically position is that we have relations with Taiwan whilst not starring the pot and causing backlash like every other country that isn't a military or economic juggernaut, taking on China for a do nothing stance like saying Taiwan is a country is a good way to see sanctions (like we did when Morrison our last one, who said there should be an investigation into the origins of COVID, a fairly benign statement), where they blocked the majority of trade like ore, coal, grain, wine etc, doing something as large as standing up to them on Taiwan you can expect a much harder push back, which would undoubtedly see the largely controlled by opposition news in Australia have a party at the negative press they can generate as they blame the inevitable economic downturn on "War mongering, and poor decision making" etc, likely tipping some people back onto the opposition and potentially costing the next election. So the decision to remain quiet until more than words are actually needed, is by far the sensible one, and continue to provide diplomatic relations through the Australian Office in Taipei (Australia's unofficial embassy in Taiwan) and the The Taipei Economic and Cultural Office (TECO) in Australia, both agree is the best tactic for both countries (With Taiwan not really all that interested in being in the middle of having countries that China can start things over, without them being able to do anything in return, starting anything) But like basically all countries, at least with western ideals all support Taiwan even if their governments are smart enough to not say anything, nobody likes that thats the reality of the day, but it is, reality is the only countries that can publicly fight China without fear of repercussions are few in number. So TLDR (finally appropriate), most Australians are either stupid and listen to the bias media and assume since Labor is technically Left wing, they are commies, therefore support China, with little more thought required or they have some brain cells and understand that its a complex issue that requires nuance and the current stance is about the best we can muster until things change on the geopolitical/global stage.
To be fair tho that's like saying you prefer pineapple pizza to rat poison. All Albanese has to do to be better than Morrison is not be openly corrupt and to somewhat know what he's doing.
At first I honestly thought he would dismiss modi as a hindu populist in a hindu majority country but I'm pleasantly surprised he did a fair job on why modi is popular, for doing things!
Honestly, what does he even do to be a 'Hindu populist', feels like the names being thrown around to discredit him, it's not like he's withholding any welfare from other minorities, nor giving his own group any extra benefits, he just develops the country. No one's perfect but can we focus on actual places of criticism
@@tourmelion9221 If Trump didn't actually withold welfare on a basis or race or give white people extra rights, he'd still be a white nationalist. I don't think describing Modi as a "Hindu populist" is necessarily wrong, but you're right that it's thrown around to discredit him instead of being examined critically.
@@tourmelion9221 It's all about switching the names. If you aren't a part of their ideology, you get attached with words like '_____ nationalist', 'regime' etc Rahul Gandhi being indicted is the death of democracy but Trump getting indicted is a victory of democracy.
@雷 I feel context really makes the label here, for indians they're made to feel ashamed of their culture, they have been historically and it persists now, so bigging up India and it's cultures is to remedy that But america is known historically for violence and white supremacist rhetoric, so nationalism will just reference and emulate that. Modi acts more like a cheer leader, I personally haven't found anything very scary about any of the things he's said, nothing that feels like it oversteps another groups boundries
Finnish presidents currently have barely any more power than European Monarchs. Kings and Queens often also have high approval ratings because they do not make any political decisions and instead mostly do ceremonial duties and soft-power advertising to foreign politicians and domestic citizens.
@@ilesalmo7724 Most presidents aren't able to do shit without backing of a political party. There are some exceptions though, like Putin since he has such strong grip on his country. Even US president can hardly change anything important without backing of a party.
@@spugelo359 US presidents can change a lot on their own while some countries president have mainly representative purpose and not really any real decision capabilities. I don't know about Finland in particular though. If a president is able to just do whatever they want then that would just be a dictatorship
@@tomlxyz finnish presidents don't have particularly strict roles but the agreement is that they are more outward facing and diplomatic, leaving the internal and day to day government decisions to the PM. The president is supposed to leave their party affiliations behind upon assuming office, and so the role is much more about being a representative than a ruler
@@greg_mca Still, the president is the head of the government and not the PM. (S)he is also the head of the military and no new law passes without presidential approval.
I can't speak for the rest of the politicians and nations mentioned on the list. But your segment of Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi and India seem poorly researched. Calling erstwhile Prime Minister Late Mr. Atal Bihari Vajpayee as a western educated technocrat is just false. He was a grassroot politician (meaning he rose through the ranks and was popular amongst the party workers) and was educated in India. Also, the current Prime Minister is not the only one to speak in Hindi. In fact a majority of Indian leaders on the national stage speak Hindi. Sure, a lot of regional leaders prefer addressing the public in the local language but those vary by region. Vajpayee was a poet and a writer who wrote in his native tongue Hindi and was an eloquent and impressive orator known for his unique delivery style. Modi on the other hand speaks Hindi with native proficiency but is from the region of Gujarat and his mother tongue is Gujarati. I understand that a lot of things can be lost in translation and cultural references do not travel well. But these are pretty well known facts that can be researched with relative ease. Therefore, it's slightly disappointing to see that your research team has let you down.
This TLDR fool thinks Manmohan Singh and Vajpayee are from political dynasties, while he doesn’t even mention or show an image of of any of “Gandhis” when talking about political dynasties. He and many other TH-camrs know as much about the nuances in India, as we know of Mexican politics.
@@VMRDY That is true. In fact, India is so large and varied that even for an Indian to understand the political intricacies is a big ask. Politics in West Bengal and Tamil Nadu is so radically different in nature from that in Uttar Pradesh or Maharashtra. Similarly, the parliamentary system also throws up interesting variables into the equation. This video, however, gets the basic things wrong. Which is confusing. If anyone needs a reason that they should take all the information on TH-cam with a grain of salt, this is it.
@@Maratha382 I would like to hear more from you on that. Like what are your reasons for believing that the current Prime Minister is destroying democracy?
AMLO is usually pronounced "ahm-loh" :) Also, is Mexico really running on a deficit? I was under the impression that the current government was actually close to a 0% yearly budget deficit?
The payments for the debt are close to 3.4% of the GDP, those levels hasn't been seen since 1996. The money is going mainly to white elephant proyects so there won't be any returns.
4:18 Any Hindu(incliding sikhs ,buddhists and jains) who love this nation are Hindu Nationalists❤🚩🕉 We are a great civilisation and people have just started to realise it Hope we'll regain our powerful position on world stage
Cool video, would love for this to be an annual thing! 🎉 It would be good to mention how long each person has been in power. As Patel was very recently elected but Modi has been in power for years, making it all the more impressive. Now about Patel's hotness, since politicians always screw us at least let it be a hot one ha!
In my opinion the red thread is: People want to feel safe and prosperous. Fighting crime, reducing wealth inequality, standing up to foreign aggressors, etc. all make people feel/be safer and more prosperous.
Petr Pavel is such a Gigachad! He really says and does what he thinks is right no matter what ruling coallition nor opposition says. May he be our president for 9 more years 🫡
@@rizkyadiyanto7922 President in Czech republic has almost no real power, he has basically representational and influential role in politics. He has been iniciating a law to lower wages of polititians after he signed a law that lowers wages of retired people, as their wage was too high due to previous ruling parties, he also declared he doesn't need the full amount of presidential wage. Apart from this he has already visited Slovakia, Poland and Germany, where he showed great diplomatic skills. All of this aside he is leaning towards west and EU and heavily supports Ukraine. Long live our president!
wait, India's GDP is avg? growth hasn't been great? US GDP for 2022 is 2.8%, China is 3% while India stood a towering 7% GDP in the midst of sinking World's economy. Such an amateur research from this channel
I see the common tread being government investment rather the 3rd party investment. When Rishi/Tory party dicuss investment they mean foreign money or big industry.
To clarify, as a swiss person, the position of president in Switzerland is mostly ceremonial, the president holds very little power of internal affairs, which makes ot easy to think positively of them considering they can't do much harm. Also, the president changes every year, so most of the time your average swiss person doesn't even know who they are. Berset's popularity comes from the pandemic, during which he wasn't president but the health minister. He's generally seen as having handled the pandemic well, but a big part of his popularity is also superficial. He had memorable speeches and is seen as a friendly figure.
Was wondering if Albanese would be mentioned. A big part of Albo’s popularity is the comparison between him and ex-PM Scomo (Scott Morrison). Also cool to see they mentioned the recent state election in NSW, but there was also a by-election in the state of Victoria that handed Albanese’s Labor party victory in a traditionally Liberal seat (the first time in over a hundred years the government’s won a by-election against the opposition). It just goes to show most Aussies don’t approve of all the negativity the Libs spread, and continues to provide Albanese and Labor endorsement from the voters
Mr Modi and its cabinet ministry is popular because of their work, though you’re welcome to skepticate. I mean there is a reason for them being elected in majority in world’s largest democracy.
When authoritarian governments release fake poll numbers, be it election results or leader popularity, they should at least try to make it realistic. 71% would seem more realistic to an outsider than 99% for leader popularity or a rigged election results. I don't know why can't they use some common sense even when faking it.
The GDP growth rate under Modi has not remained sub standard as you mentioned. India grew at over 6-7% between 2014-18. 19 and 20 were bad years due to US China Trade wars and Covid and since 2021, India is the fastest growing major country on the planet, growing each year at 7+ % PS: Comerades from my country are gonna call it 'WhatsApp university ' immediately (as they are pre programmed like that) so I would request comerades to visit the World Bank website and see for yourself ( I hope you know how to Google though)
Currently the Portuguese President, Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa would be among the most popular world leaders that was missed in this video, if you make a part 2 you should mention him
It was a couple of years ago, but now I don't think so. Recently I saw a pole on which Marcelo has like 35-40% of popularity - it's way more than any other Portuguese politician right now, but it's very far away from his historical popularity during the 2017 fires in Pedrógão Grande and many other places (back then he had a popularity above 85%, if I'm not mistaking).
I have been following Australian politics recently and I can say that Albanese and labor are on cloud nine while the coalition is kinda in mirky waters.
It's always been like that, it's just the Australian people stupidly go into the mirky waters after a small amount of time unless Labor gives massive hand outs to the upper class.
The Finnish president Sauli Niinistö has also something like 92% aproval rating. He is not the leader of the government though but more like a seremonial leader. For the PM there is no such polling because finnish pollitics is mainly leb by a coalition of a few parties. There is not much sense in messuring popularity of single parties in this system.
I'm surprised you didn't mention the Finnish President Sauli Niinistö. Likewise, the Portuguese president Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa is still quite popular.
Marcelo is still quite popular but I don't think he would be in this list any longer. Recent polls say he has now a popularity of 35 to 40%, which is very far away from the historical levels of 2017, when he had a popularity above 85%.
Most people in the donbass are under Russian occupation. Hell, actually Russias mistake started already in 2014 when they took over Crimea and the big cities of Donetsk and Luhansk. That meant that millions of pro-Russian voters were stripped from being able to take part in Ukrainian politics. Before 2014 the country was pretty 50-50 on pro-west and pro-russia. By taking away millions of pro-russian voters from Ukraine, Russia kind of shot themselves in the foot and gave the pro-west side the upper hand.
How Convenient it is to downgrade India and Indians for u guys. So much propaganda. ‘Modi is just a Hindu nationalist’. Well I am a Sikh and I fully support PM MODI. What will u say to that? Do u think I am the only non hindu who admires him??
Even the opposition of Bukele says he has those ratings. Like the other day i was reading a newspaper that openly opposes him and they reported that he had around those numbers... The lowest i have seen they report has been 83 and after that like a month or two later they did another poll and bang back up to 90+.
Few things to point out from the outset: Being popular doesn't automagically mean being fair, competent, or generally a good leader... it can be a positive indicator though, that needs to be considered among a whole list of other things. After all, being extremely unpopular means you just can't do anything in a democracy, so it's best to be around the split or upwards. Impossible to have a common thread there as there are too many variables. Popularity ranges from cult of personality stuff, being the opposite of a very unpopular predecessor, the current state of politics in a nation, being very attuned to mainstream opinions, general charisma stuff, down to minute things like one major recent decision that gets the approval of the majority. People just have to keep in mind that lots of decisions that politicians could make that will affect the future of a nation can be incredibly unpopular because it directly affects citizens... particularly when it comes to either boring stuff like infrastructure reforms, all the way to economic reforms that affects the entire population negatively but might be essencial to avoid a collapse, those leaders will be unpopular even if the measures are necessary. And then there are decisions that needs to be made because of external factors, like being part of an economic block, and stuff like that. The ill effects of some of those could be tackled against a leader simply because he or she would be the convenient target. But we can look at extremes. I'm willing to bet that if an honest non-manipulated survey could be conducted in North Korea, with honest independent opinions not shaped by government, dear leader would still be extremely popular. Not because he's doing a great job as a leader, but because North Koreans grew up conditioned to see him as a living God on Earth. He's divinity to them, much like religious people see their own saints and Gods. That is the extreme of cult of personality of course... people working to death, skin and bones from hunger, watching the country as it trails this route towards total and complete destruction by a future war, will still adore their leader because they don't think they are in a position to judge. Further, they don't even know what having other leaders would be like, there is no basis for comparison, and they usually don't know enough of what happens in leadership, in their own nation, or outside of it, to really tell things apart.
I see a common thread here for sure: populism. Each of those leaders has an "Other" they can rally their base against, and thereby galvanize unprecedented support. Crime (Bukele), Russia (Zelensky/Pavel), Muslims/US/China (Modi), and the rich (Obrador). Sometimes it can work out for the better (like with Zelensky), but most of the time it's a very dangerous precedent.
Modi invited president of USA 🇺🇸 Donald Trump in India by the way 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣, India is not enemy of China we are enemy of Chinese Communist party that's it, And there is no proof that Modi hated Muslims.
Imagine casually dropping that Bukele had made a deal with the gangs, while no one has showed proof of it and was only an Opposition talking point before the large crackdown on the gangs...
@@julioreinaldocastro-palomi2906 No entiendo: ¿Por qué ambos dicen que es sin pruebas? Existen pruebas reunidas por la prensa investigativa, y la única contra argumentación a dichas es el hecho de que el gobierno responsabiliza a la oposición de intentar desestabilizarlo. No existen pruebas de que no lo hicieran, y si de que lo hicieran y rompieran dicho pacto, e inclusive esa explosión de homicidios en marzo de 2022 es un fuerte indicio de que existieron negociaciones que se truncaron porque seguramente las pandillas querían hacerle lo mismo al gobierno que hicieron con el gobierno de Mauricio Funes cuando se le ocurrió la estúpida idea de que pactar era la salida: exigirle más y más al gobierno a medida pasará el tiempo. Lo que fue diferencial fue que este gobierno tiene control absoluto del país, ya no es un gobierno con procesos democráticos así que tiene la ventaja de que pueden saltarse la burocracia y la ley para poder manejar la situación y encubrir el estado de la misma a su antojo. Pero bueno, esas cosas jamás van a poder probarse porque "son inventos de la oposición y si el gobierno dice que buscar la verdad es ser de oposición pues se le cree por ad populum".
whilst he definitely doesn't have as many fans as most world leaders bc most have never heard of him I think proportionately speaking the king of Bhutan probably has one of the highest approval ratings I'd imagine, for the few who know anything about Bhutan it seems to be fairly unanimous that he's very likeable
I couldn't find any polling or survey data but I think Mia Mottley the Prime Minister of Barbados is fairly popular. Mia is seen by most Barbadians as vocal leader, and welcomes her speaking up about important issues across the world stage. Plus in 2022 her political party the Barbados Labour Party retained power, plus won all 30 parliamentary seats.
Australian here, the Labor party these days is more of a centre party than it is centre-left. It has been drifting to the right for decades and their policies don't really match up with what people think of as left wing ideas
@@mrsmith-sh2px I don't know Australian case, but greens are not necessary left, more so in the future with climate change, it will be trasversal issue
@@elRandomTk the australian greens are a fairly broad left party with members ranging from traditional centre-left on one extreme to socialist on the other, so their policies end up being somewhere in between
@@mrsmith-sh2px The greens aren't a far-left party. certainly more left than labor, but not that much. Also Labor only aligns itself with the greens when it has to. often times it is reluctant to cooperate and the two parties frequently fight over policies. take the negotiations over the safeguard mechanism and housing fund as recent examples.
I was expecting Joko Widodo, President of Indonesia, to be included in this list. The pollster Lembaga Survei Indonesia (LSI) has released figures indicating that public satisfaction with the president, widely known as Jokowi, has consistently increased over recent months, reaching 76.2% at the beginning of 2023.
I think the trend in these leaders is that they all get things done and change their countries in ways that are objectively good. Everybody likes better infrastructure like roads and water, everybody likes less crime, everybody likes the deterrence of invaders. And all of these changes are happening quickly and are noticable. Way fewer people care about politicians that spend their time on controversial laws that have uncertain effects in 20 years from now. But Western Europe for example is not (really) at war, has good infrastructure and is pretty safe. So apart from the economy which is tricky to deal with, the most prominent matters are socio-cultural ones. And those usually cause divisions and have smaller and more indirect impacts on (living standards in) a country.
@@bharatyaswaraj5641 😂 I have friends in Karnataka and kerala thry want Yogi. Even bengal and orissa friends want yogi. Yogi is famous every where. There is nothing like cowbelt bimaru at all. Up is a state where investment outshines its GDP. 🥳
Definitely need a least popular and maybe a video highlighting some hopefully positive future candidates. Here in the UK seems like there's no good options or hope when it comes to politicians
While Zelenskyy might indeed have a very high approval rating, I would argue that the data about it is also not very reliable, since a large portion of Ukrainian population has fled the country or has been displaced by the war.
Rahul Gandhi is more popular than Modi in India. Each one of Rahul Gandhi' s comments become viral and instrumental in facilitating more votes for Modi.
@@mrinalkumar-wu8vs Whenever Rahul Gandhi opens his mouth, he utters something stupid, it beci viral and more votes go to Modi since people understand the consequence if they don't.
Narendra Modi has highest approval ratings among the leaders of all major countries. He will be elected as Indian prime minister for the third time in 2024
His party received about 50% in the last 2 elections which is pretty low for most countries but just enough for India. Because India is a multi-party democracy and most ministers need just 30% of the votes to get elected.
Albo (Anthony Albanese-Australia) just had another win. There was a by-election on the weekend of a former Liberal minister and Labor won it, which was the first time a sitting government has won a seat off the opposition in a by-election in over 100 years (people nearly always use by-elections here to tell the government they suck, but this time we told the opposition they suck).
They did say Bukeles methods are problematic. Strangely there hasn't been that much outcry compared for example to what Dutertes regime in The Philippines got. Mostly Bukele is internationally known for his bitcoin shenanigans
I am from Mexico and I expected Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador to be in here, since most polling shows him above 55%, and that is remarcably worse than his previous 70% approval ratings he had in previous years. The reality is that he is far from being an extraordinary leader, and is more of a mid president in decisions, but his image for many mexicans it's the light at the end of the tunnel, since he really shines compared to the decades of corruption and sellouts.
El Salvador's methods of reducing crime is not problematic at all. It mostly involves arresting anyone with gang tattoos and has been a pretty simple but very effective way of reducing crime!
@@Wfalen Not just a tattoo, a gang tattoo. People who have gang tattoos, are in gangs. Gang violence is the reason for the massive amount of crime and murder that has been happening El Salvador. So, you lock them up, there is much less violence. Not sure why you're complaining about a policy that has quite literally worked and Salvadorians are in massive approval of it ?
As an Aussie can confirm our Prime minster Albo, is very popular over here and is currently pushing for a constitutionally enshrined voice for our first nations people to parliament, through a referendum!
Modi is Hindu nationalist, so christians ruling christian countries must also be Christian Nationalists. Similarly, Muslim leaders like Erdogan or MBS and all 50 others must also be Muslim Nationalists. . Anyways nothing wrong in being a Hindu nationalist. Our culture is under threat, it's important to be Hindu Nationalists in India.
@@DarthVader-ei3juif majority is resorting to extremism, then trust me, I think the "peaceful" minority must have atleast some sort of problem, if not a LOT of problems
Our former prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayeeji wasn't a English speaking technocrat or belonging to any political dynasty. He was one of the best PM and honest politician of our country.
Yes he was very wrong there, he also missed Lal Bahadur Shastri ji
And now modani is something
@@nightking2182 stfu and cope
This foreigners doesn't know anything about India it's not their fault. Their mind is fully wased by so called western media, who is always intersted in showing negative side or image of India everytime whether it's relevant or irrelevant news. People like this who create videos always quotes western media reports, which is fully baised and the repoter who's writing article have many stereotypes regarding Sanatan Hindus. This results to Hinduphobia in their article which can clearly identifiable.
@@nightking2182 Adani is India's asset
Adani ambani and tata only ones competing with china.
Adani is defeating china in overtaking ports
78% popularity in 1.4 billion people is actually impressive
Because, What this tldr guy is telling is wrong, -"India's Growth is Average", Really?IMF says India is the World's Fastest Growing Major Economy and Global Economic Bright Spot as did not only had a very Strong Recovery growth of 8.7% in 2021-22, and 7% in 2022-23 despite Global Slowdown and Under Modi since 2014, India's Economy Overtook Russia, Brazil, France,Italy and the UK to become world's 5th Largest Economy and As predicted by 2028 to Overtake Germany and Japan to Join Top-3 Economic Powers of the World and India's Exports are also a Record of $ 770 Billion USD an increase of nearly 100 Billion from 2021 despite Global Slowdown and India is the World's 2nd largest Receiver of Foreign Direct Investments worth $ 83 billion USD only behind China in 2021, And India under Modi became a Digital Powerhouse with 42% of World's Digital Transactions worth $ 1.7 Trillion USD were from India up from Zero 6 years back and And India's Poverty has declined to 6% as reported by IMF which is less than The US or the UK and India has also Become Global Technological Powerhouse with world's 2nd Highest Startups, 3rd Highest Unicorns and Billionaires and 3rd Most leading in Future Critical Technologies including AI, Bio, Space and Quantum Computing as reported by ASPI
I don't live in India, but as an ethnic Indian I meet a ton of people who like him
@@osheridan Who are you by the way?
An Indian immigrant?
By the way I am an Indian.
@@krishnkant9477 My father is Bangladeshi-Indian, I live in Australia but still follow Indian politics and am trying to learn Bengali :)
@@osheridan Thanks bro.
I am from state of Bihar in Eastern India which borders the state of West Bengal.
Where is the beloved supreme leader Kim Jong un? He's been governing for years and I never saw anyone complaining
😂😂😂
this channel is western propaganda.
Unfortunately his approval has waned in recent years and currently only stands at about 120% from its peak of nearly 200% back in 2016
@@rizkyadiyanto7922 is that why most on the list aren't western leaders?
He has a 100% approval rate
Would be interesting to see the list of the most unpopular leaders.
Africa lol
macron
sunak
biden
@@rizkyadiyanto7922 and trump
Ah fuck, that's me
@@aaroncousins4750 Trump wouldn't count since he isn't a leader anymore, and if we count old leaders, it wouldn't be anyone alive today
I think the most uniting theme connecting these most popular leaders is contrast with their predecessors
As an Aussie who's mum voted for Labor on the condition that "they're not Scott f-cking Morrison", this is very true.
@@schad1738 I hope you’re happy with Albanese’s plan to spend up to $368 billion for the purchase and maintenance of only eight submarines.
@@VMRDYthere's a reason they're only shit-lite
@@VMRDY implying Dutton doesn't also want to do that?
@@Cassandra03 Na, he'll spend $368 Trillion for four submarines
I saw Modi at COP26 and it makes sense now why he dressed differently to the other politicians in the room who were all in formal suits.
And I never seen (except social media or tv) her even though I am indian
He was in formal attire too. It was just Indian formal attire 😊
I’m sure you meant formal western suits.
@@kc4276 Ah I see. I interpreted it as populist attire. I stand corrected!
@Unreal_jon i like it more than the suits
He don't forget his roots
I think with Pavel it should have been noted that he‘s just been recently elected. I think that influences the approval ratings to some degree
Still one can get behind a president that rides a motorcycle and wares leather jackets. It shows that he's more in touch with the world and closer to the every man than those corrupt suit wearing shells that we call career politicians.
same here in France, it always happens that way
Considering Zeman was before him, no surprise! And Babis was an alternative in the polls, so I bet many are just happy for what they got
that's actually a common theme of high popularity. many elected leaders start popular, those who stay popular during their term are the notable thing.
Good point.
4:12 I think it is insane when you realise that the leader of the 🇮🇳 World's Largest Democracy has one of the highest % approval ratings - in a democracy of a massive 1.4 Billion people (that's more than 3 x Triple the population of the next largest democracy of the 🇪🇺EU - and still it is not even a country)!!
That’s because it a pretence of a democracy,all the media an bilinonaires are members an supporters of bjp
@@dilonkumar4960 cry more 😂
@@hrishikeshmohite3602 still the truth his a nazi
@@hrishikeshmohite3602 that's all you have left to say. modi zombies cannot speak on substance just sound like chat GPT bots spouting the same phrases over and over.
@@kunaljain1986 before him you don't even have a toil€t😂
Look how foreign is laughing at our toilet problem 😂
I am an India and there are four main reasons for Modi's popularity
1) his no nonsence approach to defence and foreign policy. As you mentioned, the foreign policy of his government is widely loved in the country. It is not that India's foreign policy has changed drastically, we were balancing US and Russia before we are doing it now. But now we feel we have a voice, thanks in big part to our foreign minister S Jaishankar's firey speeches.
Fir defence i don't think I need to say something. The two sergical strikes on Pakistan, the stability in Jammu and Kashmir, speak for themselves.
2) His infrastructure building approach. It is well known Indian infrastructure was in a miserable state a few years back. As you mentioned the pace of highway building has nearly tripled. But you did not mention the quality. The new highways are of very high quality challenging some in the western world. Also, the number of airports has nearly doubled, the pace of metro construction has more than tripled. The transformation of railways with new stations and new trains are all happening and everybody and see it. The number of industries is steadily increasing because of this infrastructure push so obviously he is popular because of this.
3) The stupid opposition. I just don't understand why the oppositions parties can't get their act together. Rahul Gandhi can not defeat modi, they need someone else but they somehow don't understand that. They don't talk about actual issues but are stuck on some which don't work. Everytime I think that they have now learnt and this is the step in right direction, they do something and go two step back. Add ti ut Modi's gigantic party machinery which never fails to highlight even the smallest achievement if their governments and you have what you see now.
4) no scams/corruption. The previous government was riddled with scams worth billions. In these nine years Modi has managed to urn the government without a single scam. This aspect is given much less credit than it deserves.
I agree with 1,2,3 point but I disagree with the 4 poin because I think previous congress party good in caching the corrupt people. It can be happening that modi government doing corruption but we did not finding it. On economic modi government did many blunder. Like demonetisation and gst why I saying gst because it's so world bank say that it's world most complicated tax system. Gst hase 5 slab anather country hase only one and two slab. Problem was that first 2 years before demonetisation we seeing higher than 8 percent growth rate and it's increasing but after that over growth rate plummeted to 6% and lower growth rate 2021 groth rate was rebound and it's depressing in 2022 and 2023.
Good points, except for the tripling the highway being built one. That's terrible policy lol.
@@alexseguin5245 railways infrastructure is also being built faster than before , its currently 83% electrified
@@alexseguin5245 I mean for a large country with underdeveloped infrastructure, tripling the highway building speed isn't as crazy
We're going through what US went through during Eisenhower era
@@shadowpat810 I have a question what you think about india economic policy.
Three things I notice:
1) Almost all these leaders feel like they come from outside of the regular political class. What makes someone a member of the political class is no doubt different in different countries, but it’s still recognisable.
2) There’s a feeling that these leaders cut through bureaucratic obstruction and actually get things done. This is connected to the first point. In many countries, there’s a feeling that the permanent bureaucracy does its own thing, regardless of who’s nominally in charge of the government. If the bureaucrats don’t want a policy to succeed, they’ll throw lots of inertial obstruction in its path until a regular politician just gives up. But these leaders seem to be forcing through popular changes, overcoming that inertia.
3) Voters aren’t really ideological, and these leaders recognise this. They want simple, big things dealt with, like crime or bad infrastructure. They don’t care if that means adopting an apparently right wing approach on one issue and a left wing approach on another.
Well said
Really good observations
Nice observations
Shit Jingping no.1❤
Sauli Niinistö whit 99% approval rate😐
Yes make a video of the most unpopular leaders.
Macron?
@@miguelgameiro8063 maybe
Czech Prime minister Fiala has between 18-25% approval rate.
@@miguelgameiro8063 the Tory leaders
You missed the Finnish president who has a 94% approval rating right now. The polling is reliable as well.
Yeah I was really surprised Sauli Niinistö wasn't on the list. Do they think that Finnish polling is not reliable, he doesn't have that high approval or they didn't even think about checking Finland?
@@justskip4595 Well the polling was ordered from an independent company by the Finnish state media. HE came in at 92% in December and I do think that is indeed the case. I don't personally know a single person who thinks that Sauli has done a bad job or isn't just overall excellent. They were even talking about allowing him to run for third term couple of years ago because they like him so god daam much.
Finland is an irrelevant country
He hadn't been there for long. The others on the list are there for quite sometime.
Niinistö has been the president for like 10 years, while the Czech president has been there for like a month
Gallup by Finnish newspaper in July 2022: 92 % of Finns appreciate that president *Sauli Niinistö* has succeeded in his job very well or pretty well.
@Zaydan Alfariz Marin has a bit of a mixed reputation, she's been involved with a quite few controversies as of late with the latest being about the F/A-18 Hornets. With the parliamentary elections under way Petteri Orpo and Riikka Purra have been more popular among voters.
@@TechWithVille what about electing centre right Conservative party and hard right finns party?
As Ville said, we have in Finland today election day for parlament. The result gives measure of the popularity of Sanna Marin and many others.
Because the real power is in the PM? The President is a figure head
@@mikahamari6420 which alliance will win?
4:40 irnonically, Modi himself is a 🇮🇳Gujarati (ગુજરાતી) and not a Hindi (हिन्दी) himself!
@NV ...just like a Gujarati, Arab, German or Urdu guy (I'm also an ethnic Hindi myself).
@@AchyutChaudhary 'Hindi' is not an ethnicity
@@AchyutChaudhary bhopali? 😂😂
@@priyadarshi8548 so what do you call the ethnicity of native Hindi speakers?
Just like…
🇧🇩Bengali speakers = Bengalis
🇮🇳 Telugu speakers = Telugus
🇵🇰Urdu speakers = Urdus
etc… so similarly what about Hindi speakers?
@@AchyutChaudhary ethnic hindi?? 😂😂 lol
put Vajpayee on list of generation of politician that don't speak Hindi is ridiculous when he is very good speaker in Hindi. Also poet and very good by the way.
sadly he ruled only for about 7 years total and yes vajpayee still used english while on foregin visit and was not much of a populist leader. Though i personally consider him better than modi and manmohan singh
@@error144-k9l I talking about Hindi here and Vajpayee is better in Hindi also respect other language.
On The Point of modi which is result of better social engineering and such outrage like people think he will eradicate Muslim.
@@error144-k9l vajpayee was probably the best pm of india ever on par with LB Shastri
I think atal Bihari Vajpayee is the only Indian leader who isn't hated by anyone, be it conservatives, liberals or centrists. Even pakistanis don't seem to hate him.
@@farukhsheikh5790 you forget Lal Bahadur Shastri
I'm surprised that approval rates just above the majority are the highest in the world. But yes, as an Australian I can confirm Albanese is a vast improvement over Scomo
The coalition was so corrupt that the bar for being a good politician in Australia is just not to be corrupt or kill koalas. What a low bar Scomo set.
What do Australians think about his pro-China stance and why won’t he defend Taiwan?
@@artman12 Most people I know support Taiwan, myself included. I'm not sure what we can really do right now, except recognise them (which we should do) without it getting dangerous fast. If war does break out, we should help Taiwan ofc
@@artman12 He is not Pro-China, he is just sensibly not Publicly Anti-China for the political points like Morrison,
Behind the Scenes logical moves are taken to ensure that there is as minimal safe risk from China as our country can reasonably achieve, such as continuing the nuclear sub deal.
As for Taiwan basically the same, deal sure he could take on China and die on that hill alone, but again logically position is that we have relations with Taiwan whilst not starring the pot and causing backlash like every other country that isn't a military or economic juggernaut, taking on China for a do nothing stance like saying Taiwan is a country is a good way to see sanctions (like we did when Morrison our last one, who said there should be an investigation into the origins of COVID, a fairly benign statement), where they blocked the majority of trade like ore, coal, grain, wine etc, doing something as large as standing up to them on Taiwan you can expect a much harder push back, which would undoubtedly see the largely controlled by opposition news in Australia have a party at the negative press they can generate as they blame the inevitable economic downturn on "War mongering, and poor decision making" etc, likely tipping some people back onto the opposition and potentially costing the next election.
So the decision to remain quiet until more than words are actually needed, is by far the sensible one, and continue to provide diplomatic relations through the Australian Office in Taipei (Australia's unofficial embassy in Taiwan) and the The Taipei Economic and Cultural Office (TECO) in Australia, both agree is the best tactic for both countries (With Taiwan not really all that interested in being in the middle of having countries that China can start things over, without them being able to do anything in return, starting anything)
But like basically all countries, at least with western ideals all support Taiwan even if their governments are smart enough to not say anything, nobody likes that thats the reality of the day, but it is, reality is the only countries that can publicly fight China without fear of repercussions are few in number.
So TLDR (finally appropriate), most Australians are either stupid and listen to the bias media and assume since Labor is technically Left wing, they are commies, therefore support China, with little more thought required or they have some brain cells and understand that its a complex issue that requires nuance and the current stance is about the best we can muster until things change on the geopolitical/global stage.
To be fair tho that's like saying you prefer pineapple pizza to rat poison. All Albanese has to do to be better than Morrison is not be openly corrupt and to somewhat know what he's doing.
At first I honestly thought he would dismiss modi as a hindu populist in a hindu majority country but I'm pleasantly surprised he did a fair job on why modi is popular, for doing things!
So he was Right every time he Exposed
Modi in his Videos. 😂
Honestly, what does he even do to be a 'Hindu populist', feels like the names being thrown around to discredit him, it's not like he's withholding any welfare from other minorities, nor giving his own group any extra benefits, he just develops the country. No one's perfect but can we focus on actual places of criticism
@@tourmelion9221 If Trump didn't actually withold welfare on a basis or race or give white people extra rights, he'd still be a white nationalist. I don't think describing Modi as a "Hindu populist" is necessarily wrong, but you're right that it's thrown around to discredit him instead of being examined critically.
@@tourmelion9221 It's all about switching the names. If you aren't a part of their ideology, you get attached with words like '_____ nationalist', 'regime' etc
Rahul Gandhi being indicted is the death of democracy but Trump getting indicted is a victory of democracy.
@雷 I feel context really makes the label here, for indians they're made to feel ashamed of their culture, they have been historically and it persists now, so bigging up India and it's cultures is to remedy that
But america is known historically for violence and white supremacist rhetoric, so nationalism will just reference and emulate that.
Modi acts more like a cheer leader, I personally haven't found anything very scary about any of the things he's said, nothing that feels like it oversteps another groups boundries
Mr Modi is very charismatic he is loved by everyone the most beloved prime minister in India's history.
Modi has 78% mandate he is no 1 according to recent polling around globe if am not wrong.
I know he's not really the "top dog" but Sauli Niinistö had an approval rating of 92% last summer.
Finnish presidents currently have barely any more power than European Monarchs. Kings and Queens often also have high approval ratings because they do not make any political decisions and instead mostly do ceremonial duties and soft-power advertising to foreign politicians and domestic citizens.
@@ilesalmo7724 Most presidents aren't able to do shit without backing of a political party. There are some exceptions though, like Putin since he has such strong grip on his country. Even US president can hardly change anything important without backing of a party.
@@spugelo359 US presidents can change a lot on their own while some countries president have mainly representative purpose and not really any real decision capabilities. I don't know about Finland in particular though. If a president is able to just do whatever they want then that would just be a dictatorship
@@tomlxyz finnish presidents don't have particularly strict roles but the agreement is that they are more outward facing and diplomatic, leaving the internal and day to day government decisions to the PM. The president is supposed to leave their party affiliations behind upon assuming office, and so the role is much more about being a representative than a ruler
@@greg_mca Still, the president is the head of the government and not the PM. (S)he is also the head of the military and no new law passes without presidential approval.
at 4:30 you showed pics of 3 Indian PMs who were NOT scions of political dynasties!
I can't speak for the rest of the politicians and nations mentioned on the list.
But your segment of Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi and India seem poorly researched.
Calling erstwhile Prime Minister Late Mr. Atal Bihari Vajpayee as a western educated technocrat is just false. He was a grassroot politician (meaning he rose through the ranks and was popular amongst the party workers) and was educated in India.
Also, the current Prime Minister is not the only one to speak in Hindi. In fact a majority of Indian leaders on the national stage speak Hindi. Sure, a lot of regional leaders prefer addressing the public in the local language but those vary by region. Vajpayee was a poet and a writer who wrote in his native tongue Hindi and was an eloquent and impressive orator known for his unique delivery style. Modi on the other hand speaks Hindi with native proficiency but is from the region of Gujarat and his mother tongue is Gujarati.
I understand that a lot of things can be lost in translation and cultural references do not travel well. But these are pretty well known facts that can be researched with relative ease. Therefore, it's slightly disappointing to see that your research team has let you down.
This TLDR fool thinks Manmohan Singh and Vajpayee are from political dynasties, while he doesn’t even mention or show an image of of any of “Gandhis” when talking about political dynasties. He and many other TH-camrs know as much about the nuances in India, as we know of Mexican politics.
@@VMRDY That is true. In fact, India is so large and varied that even for an Indian to understand the political intricacies is a big ask. Politics in West Bengal and Tamil Nadu is so radically different in nature from that in Uttar Pradesh or Maharashtra. Similarly, the parliamentary system also throws up interesting variables into the equation.
This video, however, gets the basic things wrong. Which is confusing.
If anyone needs a reason that they should take all the information on TH-cam with a grain of salt, this is it.
@@UtkarshKaushikfelix A grain of salt is insufficient, only bags of salt would suffice.
Modi is ending democracy
@@Maratha382 I would like to hear more from you on that. Like what are your reasons for believing that the current Prime Minister is destroying democracy?
Glad to see Australia's Anthony Albanese as an honourable mention. What a breath of fresh air he is
China feels the same way about him 😅😂
He has agreed $300 billion for some US subs that Oz doesn't need. Total waste. China is no threat to Oz. It's all about US hegemony, at your expense.
@@Jay...777 thank god you're in no position of power and never will be😂
@@Jay...777 China is a threat to just about every country in Asia-Pacific, Australia is no exception
so in this thread we have people saying he's too pro-China and people saying he's too anti. He can't win!
AMLO is usually pronounced "ahm-loh" :) Also, is Mexico really running on a deficit? I was under the impression that the current government was actually close to a 0% yearly budget deficit?
yeah, they took that one out from their asses.
All I could find was that the deficit is around 3 % but that's lower than the deficit of the US or the UK that year
The payments for the debt are close to 3.4% of the GDP, those levels hasn't been seen since 1996. The money is going mainly to white elephant proyects so there won't be any returns.
He's trying to get it close to zero, but not sure if he's actually gotten it there.
4:18 Any Hindu(incliding sikhs ,buddhists and jains) who love this nation are Hindu Nationalists❤🚩🕉
We are a great civilisation and people have just started to realise it
Hope we'll regain our powerful position on world stage
More Christans vote for BJP than Buddhists
Cool video, would love for this to be an annual thing! 🎉
It would be good to mention how long each person has been in power. As Patel was very recently elected but Modi has been in power for years, making it all the more impressive.
Now about Patel's hotness, since politicians always screw us at least let it be a hot one ha!
Pavel*
In my opinion the red thread is: People want to feel safe and prosperous. Fighting crime, reducing wealth inequality, standing up to foreign aggressors, etc. all make people feel/be safer and more prosperous.
Petr Pavel is such a Gigachad! He really says and does what he thinks is right no matter what ruling coallition nor opposition says. May he be our president for 9 more years 🫡
what has he done after just months of his term?
@@rizkyadiyanto7922 President in Czech republic has almost no real power, he has basically representational and influential role in politics. He has been iniciating a law to lower wages of polititians after he signed a law that lowers wages of retired people, as their wage was too high due to previous ruling parties, he also declared he doesn't need the full amount of presidential wage. Apart from this he has already visited Slovakia, Poland and Germany, where he showed great diplomatic skills. All of this aside he is leaning towards west and EU and heavily supports Ukraine. Long live our president!
wait, India's GDP is avg? growth hasn't been great? US GDP for 2022 is 2.8%, China is 3% while India stood a towering 7% GDP in the midst of sinking World's economy. Such an amateur research from this channel
Never thought I'd see the day that TLDR News puts an amongus in one of their videos
Turns out getting rid of criminals makes you popular huh maybe are politicians should try that
Great work as always. One thing to note - AMLO is pronounced as a word ("ahm-low").
I see the common tread being government investment rather the 3rd party investment. When Rishi/Tory party dicuss investment they mean foreign money or big industry.
This guy just spoke such incorrect statements about Vajpayee, that I am astonished how a person can be so wrong.
The hint is in their name.
(TLDR - Too Long; Didn’t Read)
Finland's president Sauli Niinistö had approval rating of 92% in last July and likely hasn't changed since.
@elfrjz Nope
To clarify, as a swiss person, the position of president in Switzerland is mostly ceremonial, the president holds very little power of internal affairs, which makes ot easy to think positively of them considering they can't do much harm. Also, the president changes every year, so most of the time your average swiss person doesn't even know who they are. Berset's popularity comes from the pandemic, during which he wasn't president but the health minister. He's generally seen as having handled the pandemic well, but a big part of his popularity is also superficial. He had memorable speeches and is seen as a friendly figure.
Same for Pavel. The Czech president is mostly a ceremonial position.
Was wondering if Albanese would be mentioned. A big part of Albo’s popularity is the comparison between him and ex-PM Scomo (Scott Morrison).
Also cool to see they mentioned the recent state election in NSW, but there was also a by-election in the state of Victoria that handed Albanese’s Labor party victory in a traditionally Liberal seat (the first time in over a hundred years the government’s won a by-election against the opposition).
It just goes to show most Aussies don’t approve of all the negativity the Libs spread, and continues to provide Albanese and Labor endorsement from the voters
Mr Modi and its cabinet ministry is popular because of their work, though you’re welcome to skepticate. I mean there is a reason for them being elected in majority in world’s largest democracy.
I love that Albo is getting recognised!!
So 100% of the north korean support kim according to the north korean government 😂
Really?
Last time I check it was about 120% or so (source: trust me bro)
When authoritarian governments release fake poll numbers, be it election results or leader popularity, they should at least try to make it realistic. 71% would seem more realistic to an outsider than 99% for leader popularity or a rigged election results. I don't know why can't they use some common sense even when faking it.
I am from north Korea and i approve this message
India Is Fastest Economy In The World And This Anchor Is Saying It's Average. 😂
The GDP growth rate under Modi has not remained sub standard as you mentioned.
India grew at over 6-7% between 2014-18. 19 and 20 were bad years due to US China Trade wars and Covid and since 2021, India is the fastest growing major country on the planet, growing each year at 7+ %
PS: Comerades from my country are gonna call it 'WhatsApp university ' immediately (as they are pre programmed like that) so I would request comerades to visit the World Bank website and see for yourself ( I hope you know how to Google though)
Currently the Portuguese President, Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa would be among the most popular world leaders that was missed in this video, if you make a part 2 you should mention him
His popularity was much Higher a couple years ago...
I'm sick of him already. The guy can go rest.
It was a couple of years ago, but now I don't think so. Recently I saw a pole on which Marcelo has like 35-40% of popularity - it's way more than any other Portuguese politician right now, but it's very far away from his historical popularity during the 2017 fires in Pedrógão Grande and many other places (back then he had a popularity above 85%, if I'm not mistaking).
Since you included Pavel, the Finnish president Sauli Niinistö enjoys over 90% approval rating
I have been following Australian politics recently and I can say that Albanese and labor are on cloud nine while the coalition is kinda in mirky waters.
It's always been like that, it's just the Australian people stupidly go into the mirky waters after a small amount of time unless Labor gives massive hand outs to the upper class.
1:04 even if there was accurate polling, the question would be whether people appreciate these leaders out of fear, or out of their merit.
I was focussing on the phrases:
“Hindu nationalist”
“Hawkish India first policy”
“Unimpressive india’s gdp growth”
Typical.
Looks like this guy has watched some BBC and NYT videos and thinks he is a geopolitical champion... 🤣🤣🤣
President of Indonesia has 76% approval rating based on poll results back in January 2023 🤷♀️
The Finnish president Sauli Niinistö has also something like 92% aproval rating. He is not the leader of the government though but more like a seremonial leader. For the PM there is no such polling because finnish pollitics is mainly leb by a coalition of a few parties. There is not much sense in messuring popularity of single parties in this system.
I'm surprised you didn't mention the Finnish President Sauli Niinistö. Likewise, the Portuguese president Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa is still quite popular.
Marcelo is still quite popular but I don't think he would be in this list any longer. Recent polls say he has now a popularity of 35 to 40%, which is very far away from the historical levels of 2017, when he had a popularity above 85%.
You dismiss Russian polls but you accept one from the Kyiv Institute of Sociology. I wonder if it included the people of the Donbass.
lib left channel
He would probably score a higher rating if Donbass people were excluded.
Most people in the donbass are under Russian occupation.
Hell, actually Russias mistake started already in 2014 when they took over Crimea and the big cities of Donetsk and Luhansk. That meant that millions of pro-Russian voters were stripped from being able to take part in Ukrainian politics. Before 2014 the country was pretty 50-50 on pro-west and pro-russia. By taking away millions of pro-russian voters from Ukraine, Russia kind of shot themselves in the foot and gave the pro-west side the upper hand.
How Convenient it is to downgrade India and Indians for u guys. So much propaganda.
‘Modi is just a Hindu nationalist’. Well I am a Sikh and I fully support PM MODI. What will u say to that?
Do u think I am the only non hindu who admires him??
“Not using dodgy polls or covering autocrats who might inflate those through fear of arrest” 1. Bukele 🤨🤨🤨🤨
Even the opposition of Bukele says he has those ratings. Like the other day i was reading a newspaper that openly opposes him and they reported that he had around those numbers... The lowest i have seen they report has been 83 and after that like a month or two later they did another poll and bang back up to 90+.
Few things to point out from the outset:
Being popular doesn't automagically mean being fair, competent, or generally a good leader... it can be a positive indicator though, that needs to be considered among a whole list of other things. After all, being extremely unpopular means you just can't do anything in a democracy, so it's best to be around the split or upwards.
Impossible to have a common thread there as there are too many variables. Popularity ranges from cult of personality stuff, being the opposite of a very unpopular predecessor, the current state of politics in a nation, being very attuned to mainstream opinions, general charisma stuff, down to minute things like one major recent decision that gets the approval of the majority.
People just have to keep in mind that lots of decisions that politicians could make that will affect the future of a nation can be incredibly unpopular because it directly affects citizens... particularly when it comes to either boring stuff like infrastructure reforms, all the way to economic reforms that affects the entire population negatively but might be essencial to avoid a collapse, those leaders will be unpopular even if the measures are necessary. And then there are decisions that needs to be made because of external factors, like being part of an economic block, and stuff like that. The ill effects of some of those could be tackled against a leader simply because he or she would be the convenient target.
But we can look at extremes. I'm willing to bet that if an honest non-manipulated survey could be conducted in North Korea, with honest independent opinions not shaped by government, dear leader would still be extremely popular. Not because he's doing a great job as a leader, but because North Koreans grew up conditioned to see him as a living God on Earth. He's divinity to them, much like religious people see their own saints and Gods.
That is the extreme of cult of personality of course... people working to death, skin and bones from hunger, watching the country as it trails this route towards total and complete destruction by a future war, will still adore their leader because they don't think they are in a position to judge. Further, they don't even know what having other leaders would be like, there is no basis for comparison, and they usually don't know enough of what happens in leadership, in their own nation, or outside of it, to really tell things apart.
I see a common thread here for sure: populism. Each of those leaders has an "Other" they can rally their base against, and thereby galvanize unprecedented support. Crime (Bukele), Russia (Zelensky/Pavel), Muslims/US/China (Modi), and the rich (Obrador). Sometimes it can work out for the better (like with Zelensky), but most of the time it's a very dangerous precedent.
Every civilization needs an enemy to unite against.
Modi invited president of USA 🇺🇸 Donald Trump in India by the way 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣,
India is not enemy of China we are enemy of Chinese Communist party that's it,
And there is no proof that Modi hated Muslims.
All these leaders see a problem, then fix the problem
Imagine casually dropping that Bukele had made a deal with the gangs, while no one has showed proof of it and was only an Opposition talking point before the large crackdown on the gangs...
Yeah when TLDR talk about topics outside of their weelhouse they are very prone to repeating propaganda.
@@julioreinaldocastro-palomi2906 No entiendo: ¿Por qué ambos dicen que es sin pruebas? Existen pruebas reunidas por la prensa investigativa, y la única contra argumentación a dichas es el hecho de que el gobierno responsabiliza a la oposición de intentar desestabilizarlo.
No existen pruebas de que no lo hicieran, y si de que lo hicieran y rompieran dicho pacto, e inclusive esa explosión de homicidios en marzo de 2022 es un fuerte indicio de que existieron negociaciones que se truncaron porque seguramente las pandillas querían hacerle lo mismo al gobierno que hicieron con el gobierno de Mauricio Funes cuando se le ocurrió la estúpida idea de que pactar era la salida: exigirle más y más al gobierno a medida pasará el tiempo.
Lo que fue diferencial fue que este gobierno tiene control absoluto del país, ya no es un gobierno con procesos democráticos así que tiene la ventaja de que pueden saltarse la burocracia y la ley para poder manejar la situación y encubrir el estado de la misma a su antojo.
Pero bueno, esas cosas jamás van a poder probarse porque "son inventos de la oposición y si el gobierno dice que buscar la verdad es ser de oposición pues se le cree por ad populum".
Kim Jong Un has 100% approval ratings😂
whilst he definitely doesn't have as many fans as most world leaders bc most have never heard of him I think proportionately speaking the king of Bhutan probably has one of the highest approval ratings I'd imagine, for the few who know anything about Bhutan it seems to be fairly unanimous that he's very likeable
You missed one of most liked presidents in the world, Sauli Niinistö from Finland. He has approval rate of 92%
I couldn't find any polling or survey data but I think Mia Mottley the Prime Minister of Barbados is fairly popular.
Mia is seen by most Barbadians as vocal leader, and welcomes her speaking up about important issues across the world stage.
Plus in 2022 her political party the Barbados Labour Party retained power, plus won all 30 parliamentary seats.
Do you think being a small country helps her popularity? Just asking
Bukele has a 95% approval. Going after crime pays.
Australian here, the Labor party these days is more of a centre party than it is centre-left. It has been drifting to the right for decades and their policies don't really match up with what people think of as left wing ideas
Nah, it's more far left than it's centre right
Cause it's aligned itself with the Greens in recent times
@@mrsmith-sh2px I don't know Australian case, but greens are not necessary left, more so in the future with climate change, it will be trasversal issue
@@elRandomTk the australian greens are a fairly broad left party with members ranging from traditional centre-left on one extreme to socialist on the other, so their policies end up being somewhere in between
@@mrsmith-sh2px The greens aren't a far-left party. certainly more left than labor, but not that much. Also Labor only aligns itself with the greens when it has to. often times it is reluctant to cooperate and the two parties frequently fight over policies. take the negotiations over the safeguard mechanism and housing fund as recent examples.
@@mrsmith-sh2px not centre right but centre-centre.
I was expecting Joko Widodo, President of Indonesia, to be included in this list. The pollster Lembaga Survei Indonesia (LSI) has released figures indicating that public satisfaction with the president, widely known as Jokowi, has consistently increased over recent months, reaching 76.2% at the beginning of 2023.
I think the trend in these leaders is that they all get things done and change their countries in ways that are objectively good. Everybody likes better infrastructure like roads and water, everybody likes less crime, everybody likes the deterrence of invaders. And all of these changes are happening quickly and are noticable. Way fewer people care about politicians that spend their time on controversial laws that have uncertain effects in 20 years from now. But Western Europe for example is not (really) at war, has good infrastructure and is pretty safe. So apart from the economy which is tricky to deal with, the most prominent matters are socio-cultural ones. And those usually cause divisions and have smaller and more indirect impacts on (living standards in) a country.
"seems a bit sus" 💀
Maturity is when you realise that Yogi Adityanath has more approval rating then all of them combined 😂😂..
Fr🗿
Yogi is only popular in Cowbelt bimaru states
@@bharatyaswaraj5641 You're ignorant.
@@bharatyaswaraj5641 😂 I have friends in Karnataka and kerala thry want Yogi. Even bengal and orissa friends want yogi. Yogi is famous every where.
There is nothing like cowbelt bimaru at all. Up is a state where investment outshines its GDP. 🥳
@@Jambudwipvasi investment outshines its gdp😂😂 bro needs some facts
The re-occuring theme here is the amount of cuts in the audio.
The differences in production quality of your videos is almost staggering.
Definitely need a least popular and maybe a video highlighting some hopefully positive future candidates. Here in the UK seems like there's no good options or hope when it comes to politicians
Why does the graphic say March 2015 at 2:38 when Jack says last year?
Narendra Modi 😊😊😊❤❤
you forgot about 4th largest population with the leader approval rating above 80%
Modi is not a hindu nationalist .....he is nationalist hindu.... Why u dont use christian nationlist.
President Sauli Niinistö from Finland, if you count voting as reliable info, when he got elected 2nd term, he won like 84% of votes
Our Modi is the best🇮🇳❤ Even you need him for your Thumbnail 😅
9:05 though we were about to transition into a Brilliant ad
If Macron had been an accomplished general, he would be very popular and could become the Senate himself.
I Agree With You Sire
A popular president in France? I don't think that is possible.
There is one common thread. These leaders listen to the people they are governing. They try to protect them and try to do what is best for them.
You forgot the most popular Leader with 100% approval rating KIM JONG UN
"dangerously good looking" LMAOOO
While Zelenskyy might indeed have a very high approval rating, I would argue that the data about it is also not very reliable, since a large portion of Ukrainian population has fled the country or has been displaced by the war.
Online polls,okay
@@rhea7756 that is even less reliable lmao
At least in 2022 the approval rating of Sauli Niinistö hit 92%.
Charisma is way too important in politics sadly
Sauli Niinistö of Finland had 92% approval last year.
Rahul Gandhi is more popular than Modi in India. Each one of Rahul Gandhi' s comments become viral and instrumental in facilitating more votes for Modi.
What.
he is comedian
@@mrinalkumar-wu8vs Whenever Rahul Gandhi opens his mouth, he utters something stupid, it beci viral and more votes go to Modi since people understand the consequence if they don't.
he is star campaigner of Modi and Biggest ever Planted spy in any opposition party ever in the world
At a glance it almost looked like a chubby characature of Kim Jong Il on the 500 peso note...
Narendra Modi has highest approval ratings among the leaders of all major countries.
He will be elected as Indian prime minister for the third time in 2024
End of democracy in India
@@GeoGlobeEditz Modi haters will keep on coping like this but we will continue to support him.
His party received about 50% in the last 2 elections which is pretty low for most countries but just enough for India. Because India is a multi-party democracy and most ministers need just 30% of the votes to get elected.
@@GeoGlobeEditz In your dreams perhaps.
@@flowzeta5412 Yes, you are correct.
Albo (Anthony Albanese-Australia) just had another win. There was a by-election on the weekend of a former Liberal minister and Labor won it, which was the first time a sitting government has won a seat off the opposition in a by-election in over 100 years (people nearly always use by-elections here to tell the government they suck, but this time we told the opposition they suck).
Modi is a most popular leader in the World 🌎🌎
You forgot to tell about UPI and RuPay
left wing है ब्रो
@@Sumitkumaar0999 lol UPI rupay is made by manmohan singh
showing proper map of INDIA is appreciated
But Approval rating is rater questionable when all media is godi media.
Best Prime Minister is Vajpayee. That all.
@@puneetsharma1437 grass is greener on the other side.
@@puneetsharma1437 yes. Modi is ending indian democracy
@@Maratha382 shut up and stop using my casts name.
@@puneetsharma1437
Most of the servey agency of approval rating are global firms
Nothing on how human rights watch consistently calls out El Salvador for human rights abuses?
They did say Bukeles methods are problematic. Strangely there hasn't been that much outcry compared for example to what Dutertes regime in The Philippines got. Mostly Bukele is internationally known for his bitcoin shenanigans
Yeah Albo!!!!! With the honourable mention
I am from Mexico and I expected Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador to be in here, since most polling shows him above 55%, and that is remarcably worse than his previous 70% approval ratings he had in previous years.
The reality is that he is far from being an extraordinary leader, and is more of a mid president in decisions, but his image for many mexicans it's the light at the end of the tunnel, since he really shines compared to the decades of corruption and sellouts.
El Salvador's methods of reducing crime is not problematic at all. It mostly involves arresting anyone with gang tattoos and has been a pretty simple but very effective way of reducing crime!
So a tattoo is enough to jail someone?
I hear this usually from some very conservative religious nuts.
@@Wfalen Not just a tattoo, a gang tattoo. People who have gang tattoos, are in gangs. Gang violence is the reason for the massive amount of crime and murder that has been happening El Salvador. So, you lock them up, there is much less violence. Not sure why you're complaining about a policy that has quite literally worked and Salvadorians are in massive approval of it ?
@@Wfalen mS16 literally have a motto that goes "Rape and control" and what you know they love to do the former.
As an Aussie can confirm our Prime minster Albo, is very popular over here and is currently pushing for a constitutionally enshrined voice for our first nations people to parliament, through a referendum!
Modi 🗿
??
He is popular
@@mrinalkumar-wu8vs I'm from the non Hindi heartland. He's very popular here too. Also the opposition is brainless which makes him even more popular.
2:37 oh to be back in 2016
Modi is Hindu nationalist, so christians ruling christian countries must also be Christian Nationalists. Similarly, Muslim leaders like Erdogan or MBS and all 50 others must also be Muslim Nationalists.
.
Anyways nothing wrong in being a Hindu nationalist. Our culture is under threat, it's important to be Hindu Nationalists in India.
There is a thin line between culture protection and Extremism
@@DarthVader-ei3juif majority is resorting to extremism, then trust me, I think the "peaceful" minority must have atleast some sort of problem, if not a LOT of problems
Where is Sauli Niinistö?