I have been using the -18 db rms a while back and the vocals are night and day. the noise floor is low, no strange cable or PC hum. The levels are easy to work with. Thanks for sharing this back in 2017.
This is definitely one of the more beneficial audio videos out there. Calibration is hardly ever mentioned when talking about creating a good mix. Forget putting a Limiter (Or anything for that matter) in your master chain! This will allow you to have all the head room you need.
You gave the most important secret away Graham! I know how important is the diffrence between dbfs and rms or lufs in digital domain which I learned 2 year ago and my mixes sounded night and day after that especially when I learned how to sit low-end well which made all the diffrence!.Everyone should giveaway $1 to Graham for this tip! Most valuable tip ever! You rock man you are really robin hood of youtube audio world
@@AceDeclan on the pre-plugin input, just remember the difference of 18 dB. but some other tutorial says you should switch from RMS/VU to LUFS for final metering because "this is better post-plugin". I'm not sure who said that, maybe Rob, maybe Dylan, because I watched around 200 of those videos and memories start to blur... but I also haven't seen any material going into details about why LUFS would be superior for post-plugin work, so maybe a video explaining that would be needed
i know im randomly asking but does anyone know of a method to get back into an instagram account?? I stupidly forgot my password. I would appreciate any tips you can give me.
@Tucker Ezekiel I really appreciate your reply. I got to the site through google and im trying it out atm. I see it takes a while so I will get back to you later with my results.
For those interested, the song is "Sinking like a Stone" by Jameson Elder. Because it sounded cool and I had to look for it. :) (Although I feel like Graham's version sounds a little nicer than the official one I found on TH-cam.)
Thank you for this! So helpful. Every time I start a self-recording project I forget everything and need it re-explained to me in detail like a sweet little dumdum.
Graham, again, you nail it. All your knowledge is priceless but the best, it's your approach: Don't keep to your self, share to the world. Thank you. Keep doing your work. You're amazing.
I knew clipping was a huge "NO-NO", but I never brought a single track down to an average of -18db. I'm going to try this on my next track for sure. Thanks, Graham.
This is the only video that explains properly and thanks to pro tools displaying peak and RMS signals finally gives the full picture. Bravo! So many other videos not clear and confusing
Graham- Thank you sooooo much for this video. This was a light bulb moment. Thank you for explaining verbally and visually 0 db on a VU meter and 0 dB on the track level. I’m just starting out and I just couldn’t understand this concept. Of course I’m just using GarageBand right now so I don’t have the faders and meters with dB numbers so I think that was part of it. Thanks again. Learning so much from your videos.
Good topic. I put a VU meter on every plugin to clip gain to -18 dbu, during my mix prep. It would be cool for plugins to have VU meters 1st in the signal flow as a standard. That and a mix/blend knob. Maybe one day.
@@kagi2807 i understood from the video that the use of the VU meter was before any plugins, or if you have already inserted a plug in click it off then adjust the in coming volume, am i right or not?
Stephen Fell yes, you can put a vu meter on the end of the FX chain or master. but be sure that the plugins are off first. and if you put on the master, also be sure the faders are at 0db. badically, anything which acts before the vu meter does can change the value you see. i prefer to put vu meters before the plugin for simplicity but if you're using a poor computer, the other method is better.
Thanks very much. This helps me a lot for leveling my audio/plugins for my gigs. (tomorrow performing at the North Sea Jazz Festival so it has to be spot on!!!) Appreciate it tremendously!
Hi, (sorry for this question), but do you mean that you first set your gain (in my case, in Utility, in Ableton) to -18db, and then secondly you adjust volume slider until the peaks are at -18db, and then adjust vu meter, set at -18db, until the needle hits 0? I guess my real question is, do we start at 0db with the gain, or at -18db and go from there? Please respond...I'm very confused about that. Thanks. Chris in Montreal, Canada.
@@flungjung Generally you want the gain of your recorded tracks to be at -18, or in that ballpark. Your volume faders can be at 0db more or less. Basically agreeing with Graham's teaching on this video. Just continue to study proper gain staging for digital recordings, and it will start to make sense. Hope this helps.
Yay! That's (finally) the exact information I was looking for and exactly how I've done it to my project, yesterday and today. I start with turning the gain to -18db, and then go from there. Correct? And yes, I do take the time to do video research and I will continue to 'cause it does pay off. I sincerely appreciate your quick response. Chris.
Let's say I set up the gain knob on my audio interface so that my electric guitar's DI signal lands on -18db, then I put it through some amp simulation and the track's output sits at -10db. Is my goal to: - Turn down the gain knob on my audio interface and record again so after the effects, the track stays at -18? - Turn the gain down on the waveform inside my DAW so after the effects, the track stays at -18? - Reduce the track's output volume down to -18?
This is a good question, I was thinking the exact same thing. Not an expert, but after watching the video, I would interpret it like this. 1. Do the gain staging of your direct input normally, that is, adjust your preamp gain until the peak indicator on your interface or mixer flashes occasionally. 2. You should now see a level of maybe -6db to -12db in your DAW with the fader set to 0. 3. Adjust the level of the DI waveform to -18db or -16db, ready for sending into your virtual amplifier. (Edit: apparently this results in a very low volume, instead use a VU meter plugin and aim for around 0db) 4. Now use the fader normally and adjust the track volume to whatever you think suits the mix best.
Adjusting the gain back to -18db, after a plugin has altered the waveform, is good because it sets you up for any 'next plugins' you might add. If the 1st plugin doesn't have an output gain that you can adjust, you can always add a separate gain plugin to bring it back to -18db before handing the signal off to the next plugin.
Thats my favorite vu meter plug in, a few years ago you did a video using it, i bought it and have used it evet since, thankx graham. You da' Man ! 🎵🎸🔊🙏
That's absolutely make sense, I was wondering for long time, how to get that dynamic sound and this trick with VU meter before plugs -18 just works great..! Thanks for the knowledge, keep up with the great job!
I use trim in as the very first plugin in the chain, if i am the recording eng, I adjust the level to that. The main message here, is to use lower volume, and having headroom.
Hi, nu outdoor, when i put vu meter in my fx bin it hardly touch 0 db, so i turn up the gain knob ( using cakewalk sonar ) and then adjust the fader .Is that right ? Or i am doing wrong ? Thanks
The plugin lets you type in the track name for example, so that if you have multiple vu meters open, you know which one shows what. Wonderful little plugin, and dirt cheap (holds for all Klanghelm stuff btw -- no brainer purchases). The inclusion of a trimmer pot saves having to use a separate gain plugin, calibration makes it usable in different scenarios, comes with different skins... Very versatile for a simple vu meter.
The "sweet spot for plugins" totally depends on the particular plugin. Some plugins are designed to be hit with -18. Some perform more properly with other target levels.
VERY clear! Thank you! I feel like such a noob just learning this stuff now, but you pointed it out early, so many of us were simply taught wrong! Recording, FOH, even just playing music, basically EVERYTHING I've ever done sound-wise teaches the same analogue-based signal-to-noise-ratio philosophy!... Hm, a VU meter plugin is in my near future, I think :P lol Thanks again!
There are some styles of music that actually rely on saturation, hence you often have to push a quite hot signal into the plugin (unless it has it's own input and output gain stage)
I had to calibrate like this when I was experimenting with "Brauer-izing" In the box (which would be a great tutorial video btw may I recommend) and I did notice the tracks sounding much better. I attributed that to the "Braurer-izing" but now I think it was really the calibration all along.
Thank you for the video! However, many guys here in the comments including me have the same issue which gets adressed very rarely: When setting the average level to -18dbfs (0 on a -18db calibrated VU), applied to very dynamic instruments, like kick, snare, claps etc... the actual peak goes over 0dbfs very quickly! There wouldn't be a way for those type of instruments to set an average -18dbfs. In this case i always peak normalize them to max -6dbfs. Even when it is showing -20db on the VU meter and it is peaking at about -6dbfs it is the closest i can get. Is that correct? How are you doing it, Graham?
Its ok to do this in that way for Stuff like Percussion , Drums or very attacky Dynamicly Sounds .Because those Sounds don't have an Average . -10 to -6 dBFS Peak is a good Place to be for that Kind of Sounds :)
two days of looking for at vids that adds up to reality on vu at last, your my 1st person ive ever give a thumbs up to mate ! this vid dispelled all the conflicting information 100% and put sht straight, do you have a full tutorial on how you mix from midi to the end . from bounce down to actual mixing? id like to see you work
As someone said below -18dbfs is ideal for a large number of plugins, however; there are a fair amount of plugins that are -14dbfs, there are a few UA, (some may even be other levels). I also know Black rooster audio modeled the actual hardware and many of the units run at -14dbfs as well. This is great advice, just making sure people look up the plugins they are using. To my knowledge most Softube and Acustica Audio run @-18 reference as well.
@@Ninja-pc3gd Yes, this can work for some plugins that have built in VU meters and allow you to see I/O gain and not simply gain reduction levels. It's not an insurmountable task, just making people aware. Some plugins such as pultec style EQs and the like do not have a VU meter on them, so knowing the internal reference level is important as the level of boost or cut will not be uniform to other models (not that they are identical anyways...).
Hi Graham ! and Thank you for this Superb text on "Gain Staging" ! 👌🏿 Tell me, why don't you adjust the "Gain" with the "Trim" of the "VUMT" plugin but rather directly on the audio waveform !? is it not the same ? 🤔🤔 Thank you and again BRAVO for this Excellent work of explanations. Thank you. 🙏🏾
Hey Graham! Big question here, I recently made the move from Studio One to Cubase, I've been religiously following the digital audio sweet spot rule since you released this video and I thank you for that! I do it on my tracks, and also on my buses! My problem is that while you can select a gain plugin in Studio One (like Mixtool), that changes the actual input volume which is very useful on buses since many sources of audio are going into the same channel, there is no way to do that in Cubase! I do my gain staging, I set up my tracks around -16db RMS, I group them to different buses, which are obviously (like for my Drum Bus) hitting higher than -16RMS, but there is no way to actually lower the input volume of that bus so it's inevitably hitting higher that I'd like to. I know there is a Pre-Gain available on any tracks on Cubase but it actually operates AFTER the Vu Meter of the console, I've noticed that by switching the mode of the Vu. If I lower the pre-gain, the Input gain on my buses remains the same... And I've also noticed that all the plugin chain is also hitting AFTER the Vu Meter. So I'm really confused now since I've been using this technique since a while now and I'm now very enthusiast about seing my buses hitting volumes around 0dB. Have you ever heard something about this ? Could you give me any advice ? Thank you for all the great content over the years. Bastien
Still in digital world there is an advantage in recording the highest possible level before distorsion, and the reason is that a higher signal will have a better signal to error ratio after dithering.
It seems like now that I'm using this that the compressors are requiring a whole lot more. if I'm at -18 i'm using the MGUC for example; I've got the compression up all the way and i'm getting like 2-3 DB of compression. For some things that's not enough.. I've decided to go to -12 instead but now i'm not in this "sweet spot" so i don't know. This type of calibrations is probably great when doing parallel compression or maybe "Braurerizing" and have multiple instances of compression to where it adds up. I'd like to be able to stay at -18 and still slam a compressor on drums though..? Why so much headroom for pre master? (-14dbFS (PEAK?)) A mastering engineer can simply turn the track down with no sonic implications. This seems incredible tediously especially considering that if you want to do this right, you must check the dB of every single plugin in the chain! literally. You CANNOT stare at the meters when mixing... If you are mixing with your eyes and not your ears you will get a crappy mix... I'm all for gain staging but as Graham says, do not overthink this. This "Sweetspot" is not going to make your mix sound "warmer" or better. It's just insuring that you have some headroom at the end of the day.
Some of what you are saying is incorrect. For example, @8:32 you talk about how you can use the fader to choose a good level for the plugin. That's simply not the case since plugin inserts are pre-fader (the plugin inserts are not affected by the fader level). You can however control plugin gain between plugins. Long story short, I really love your channel and have learned a ton, but I think you need to revisit the subject of prefader/postfader more because I saw some inconsistencies on this subject in your submix/submaster video as well (which someone pointed out).
Hey Graham, thanks for the video! When should we use gain to boost the signal and when should we use the faders? Is the gain used to get the audio level in the general ballpark and the faders for fine-tuning?
It's very important to point out that if you're using a compressor inserted on a channel, and using a gain plugin to trim back to -18dB, that the compressor must go IN FRONT of the gain plugin. Otherwise you''ll be pumping -18db of signal into the compressor and it won't do anything like you'd like it to.
Just watched a video by Sean Devine and he shows how digital clipping on individual channels doesn't really matter and it doesn't distort as long as it's taken care of before hitting the mixbus/stereo bus. As long as our output is not clipping, it doesn't distort. He actually export an audio file and shows it. As far as hitting the sweet spot of analog modelled plugins on the way in, Yes it might be right. But is digital clipping on individual channels really a bad thing? As long as you put a VCA before the main out and control it? Appreciate if someone could clarify. Cheers!
this is only true on 32bit floating point sound engines. the sound engine will take your clipping track and allocate it more bandwidth so that it can go louder without clipping but it will turn DOWN all other tracks to give you this headroom. in other words its a pain in the ass to mixdown on because you focus on a snare going yeah it sounds better louder, louder louder all the while the rest of your mixdown is losing energy without you noticing, then you export at 24bit and wonder why you kick sounds like shit all of a sudden.
@@WillyJunior if you work on a 24bit channel it will clip in line with he 24bit master bus. If you work on a 32bit channel it will clip the master bus (24bit) before it's own channel clips. Just like you said there is no clipping in modern daes except. On the master. All I'm saying is if your mixing with 32bit floating point channels you will be able to raise the volume ALOT at the expense of the master bus' 24bit fixed point bandwidth. The channels will all show not clipping but to accommodate that very loud 32bits bandwidth the other channels will have to scale Down to accommodate the scaling up of the 32bit channel so they can all fit inside the headroom of 24bits. I will try to find an article, but it's quite easily replicated by just overloading a channel and listening to the mix even though nothing is clipping the surrounding mix elements lose volume, Whereas on 24bit channels eats headroom like analog (fixed point) I'm not explaining it well but I preferred working in the same bit depth of the master bus : it's just easier to see where the bandwidth is being consumed.
@@raedius_music Sure, that's true. The part I wasn't sure about was the rest of the mixdown losing power and the kick sounding bad. I don't know how that could happen under normal circumstances.
Thanks for the great video as always, Graham, thanks. I do have a question though, what about the quiet track? How to do the gain staging on the quiet tracks, for example, shaker, .... etc?
So to sum it all up... make sure all of your recorded tracks in your DAW are hitting the sweet spot which is 0 dB VU/- 18 dbfs before adding any plugins right???
Ah thank you, first time using digital and I am wondering if something is wrong with my interface or mic Steinberg ur22c/ Audio technica at2035 because I really have to pump the gain, but it seems more reasonable if I'm going for -18
There are a few problems with your understanding of DAW sound processing engines. Channels and buses don't clip at 0dB. Clipping only happens when the signal goes to an output device or to file. All modern DAWs use floating point values, 64bit and in practice, it's impossible to clip them. There was (is?) a version of Pro Tools that still used integer based values so they may clip. How plugins work is a case by case situation.
spoddie i hope people read your comment. and even more important, graham does! cause he has so many people following and believing him. but in this case he himself is wrong..
Indeed it's not the DAW that has a sweet spot, it's the plugins, and for those it's not guaranteed to be -18dB RMS. More people should read your comment and Graham should probably clear things up in a new video.
Great explanation. Just one question, what about very percussive sound waves like kick drum or snare? What is the optimum peak level en digital world? I guess -18DbFS RMS doesn't account for this kind of instruments. Thank you! Cheers from Argentina.
I’m using logic , when I use VU meter plugin and gain stage everything instruments/vocals pre fader to -18dbfs on VU meter, then when I look at my master channel it’s clipping every now and then, do I just lower each individual tracks when I’m gain staging until I reach about -6db on the master channel ? If so from there when I start using plug-ins do I just level match it throughout the whole mixing process so when I reach the end of my mixing, my master channel should be about -3 - -6 db ?
So in terms of getting analog signal to digital, would you have your input signal coming in at -18, or would you rather record each track "as loud as possible" and then adjust each take's individual volume to be around -18? In theory you'd still want to record the takes as loud as possible to get a good signal/noise ratio, right? And then bring the volume of the take back down in the daw - which then should bring the noise level down also.
What if you tracked using RMS between 20-15? Using this Klanghelm VUMT has standard -18db and also has RMS Meter +3dB shouldn’t I use the VUMT RMS? But what is the sweet spot on this plugin RMS meter? Is it still 0 where the red is? Or is it around -12 in the black? Ty
what difference is put gain plugin - vu meter - other plugins -gain plugin - chain to track and set volumes DAW track levels 0dBFS then doing rough mix using chain last gain plugin and accurate with daw mixer? Or don´t touch daw mixer at all only set volumes using gain plugin? I´m very interest about this. Tell me please
Thanks Graham, you are a great guy and I love your videos, but some things you said are nothing but myths. I suppose it is just semantics, but let me add that a DAW does not care about our recording levels as long as the signal is not clipped on the converter. There is an infinite headroom in the 64bit floating point environment so this only applies to no linear plugins such as compressors and saturators, and here I believe is the semantics I mentioned earlier. To be completely clear, your advice here is great but it has nothing to do with the DAW, but with the plugins, and only some of the plugins.
Graham, just a quick question: The -18db rule would apply to your busses as well, because when audio is sent to say, your drum buss, it can cumulatively cause that buss to hit levels hotter than -18db. And since the instrument and vocal busses feed into the main master buss, it would make sense to ensure that those busses are also hovering around or a bit more than the -18db mark, otherwise you end up 'crowding' the master buss with hot levels.
Mekaal Hasan -18 is an average source signal level to send to your plugins. The level into the mix bus should be around -6 before processing is added to the mix bus. You can achieve this by adjusting your faders after your plugins have been added.
Microphones aren't digital. It's still imperative you record at a level that there's no noise, too, in that situation. So, using a daw, Noise floor is something else to talk about within digital recording, too, not for digital compnents, but for analog ones.
When I set the average levels of my audio to be at -18dBFS and around 0VU, its peaks are rise above 0dBFS. what should I do? I read some comments that DAW has much more headroom above 0dBFS, should I just ignore that peak in gain staging phase (pre fader)? or should I just lower the gain regardless of the VU meter until my peak in appropriate level ?
How I miss Graham doing these videos. I am happy for him expanding his business. But I tell ya, he is the true Recording revolutionary... 😁
I was totally confused until I watched this video. Thanks for clearing this up for me!
I have been using the -18 db rms a while back and the vocals are night and day. the noise floor is low, no strange cable or PC hum. The levels are easy to work with. Thanks for sharing this back in 2017.
This is definitely one of the more beneficial audio videos out there. Calibration is hardly ever mentioned when talking about creating a good mix. Forget putting a Limiter (Or anything for that matter) in your master chain! This will allow you to have all the head room you need.
You gave the most important secret away Graham! I know how important is the diffrence between dbfs and rms or lufs in digital domain which I learned 2 year ago and my mixes sounded night and day after that especially when I learned how to sit low-end well which made all the diffrence!.Everyone should giveaway $1 to Graham for this tip! Most valuable tip ever! You rock man you are really robin hood of youtube audio world
RMS vs VU? Which one should I mix with?
@@AceDeclan on the pre-plugin input, just remember the difference of 18 dB. but some other tutorial says you should switch from RMS/VU to LUFS for final metering because "this is better post-plugin". I'm not sure who said that, maybe Rob, maybe Dylan, because I watched around 200 of those videos and memories start to blur... but I also haven't seen any material going into details about why LUFS would be superior for post-plugin work, so maybe a video explaining that would be needed
i know im randomly asking but does anyone know of a method to get back into an instagram account??
I stupidly forgot my password. I would appreciate any tips you can give me.
@Alessandro Corey Instablaster ;)
@Tucker Ezekiel I really appreciate your reply. I got to the site through google and im trying it out atm.
I see it takes a while so I will get back to you later with my results.
For a beginner, this is the most helpful video on the internet. Well done.
you have a great skill at describing what is going on. And no fluff. A+
For those interested, the song is "Sinking like a Stone" by Jameson Elder. Because it sounded cool and I had to look for it. :)
(Although I feel like Graham's version sounds a little nicer than the official one I found on TH-cam.)
Thank you for this! So helpful. Every time I start a self-recording project I forget everything and need it re-explained to me in detail like a sweet little dumdum.
You've hit the nail on the head Graham! I was just wondering about VU/FS levels, this is very insightful, thank you.
Graham, again, you nail it. All your knowledge is priceless but the best, it's your approach: Don't keep to your self, share to the world. Thank you. Keep doing your work. You're amazing.
I knew clipping was a huge "NO-NO", but I never brought a single track down to an average of -18db.
I'm going to try this on my next track for sure. Thanks, Graham.
This is the only video that explains properly and thanks to pro tools displaying peak and RMS signals finally gives the full picture. Bravo! So many other videos not clear and confusing
Graham- Thank you sooooo much for this video. This was a light bulb moment. Thank you for explaining verbally and visually 0 db on a VU meter and 0 dB on the track level. I’m just starting out and I just couldn’t understand this concept. Of course I’m just using GarageBand right now so I don’t have the faders and meters with dB numbers so I think that was part of it. Thanks again. Learning so much from your videos.
Good topic. I put a VU meter on every plugin to clip gain to -18 dbu, during my mix prep. It would be cool for plugins to have VU meters 1st in the signal flow as a standard. That and a mix/blend knob. Maybe one day.
@@englerunrlsd1019 he puts a vu meter to make sure the amount of volume going into each plugin is optimal
@@kagi2807 i understood from the video that the use of the VU meter was before any plugins, or if you have already inserted a plug in click it off then adjust the in coming volume, am i right or not?
Stephen Fell yes, you can put a vu meter on the end of the FX chain or master. but be sure that the plugins are off first. and if you put on the master, also be sure the faders are at 0db. badically, anything which acts before the vu meter does can change the value you see. i prefer to put vu meters before the plugin for simplicity but if you're using a poor computer, the other method is better.
Thanks very much. This helps me a lot for leveling my audio/plugins for my gigs. (tomorrow performing at the North Sea Jazz Festival so it has to be spot on!!!) Appreciate it tremendously!
Finally I get the best and most understandable explanation on this topic. BIG thanks.
I have been using about -18 for gain staging for a few years and it seems to work very well.
Angelvox1 in DB ? Actually me too
Hi, (sorry for this question), but do you mean that you first set your gain (in my case, in Utility, in Ableton) to -18db, and then secondly you adjust volume slider until the peaks are at -18db, and then adjust vu meter, set at -18db, until the needle hits 0? I guess my real question is, do we start at 0db with the gain, or at -18db and go from there? Please respond...I'm very confused about that. Thanks. Chris in Montreal, Canada.
@@flungjung Generally you want the gain of your recorded tracks to be at -18, or in that ballpark. Your volume faders can be at 0db more or less. Basically agreeing with Graham's teaching on this video. Just continue to study proper gain staging for digital recordings, and it will start to make sense. Hope this helps.
Yay! That's (finally) the exact information I was looking for and exactly how I've done it to my project, yesterday and today. I start with turning the gain to -18db, and then go from there. Correct? And yes, I do take the time to do video research and I will continue to 'cause it does pay off. I sincerely appreciate your quick response. Chris.
@@flungjung Yes that's correct. About -18 and go from there. Cheers!
Thanks for the tip i was searching all over youtube for this life saver
Graham, I seriously hate your music to death but you the real MVP when it comes to engineering and tutorials for this shit
Thanks??
Let's say I set up the gain knob on my audio interface so that my electric guitar's DI signal lands on -18db, then I put it through some amp simulation and the track's output sits at -10db. Is my goal to:
- Turn down the gain knob on my audio interface and record again so after the effects, the track stays at -18?
- Turn the gain down on the waveform inside my DAW so after the effects, the track stays at -18?
- Reduce the track's output volume down to -18?
This is a good question, I was thinking the exact same thing. Not an expert, but after watching the video, I would interpret it like this.
1. Do the gain staging of your direct input normally, that is, adjust your preamp gain until the peak indicator on your interface or mixer flashes occasionally.
2. You should now see a level of maybe -6db to -12db in your DAW with the fader set to 0.
3. Adjust the level of the DI waveform to -18db or -16db, ready for sending into your virtual amplifier. (Edit: apparently this results in a very low volume, instead use a VU meter plugin and aim for around 0db)
4. Now use the fader normally and adjust the track volume to whatever you think suits the mix best.
Adjusting the gain back to -18db, after a plugin has altered the waveform, is good because it sets you up for any 'next plugins' you might add. If the 1st plugin doesn't have an output gain that you can adjust, you can always add a separate gain plugin to bring it back to -18db before handing the signal off to the next plugin.
Finally someone teaches me this that is so important. Thanks a lot.
Thank you so much this is going to make my mixing A1, May every great thing come your way
Thats my favorite vu meter plug in, a few years ago you did a video using it, i bought it and have used it evet since, thankx graham. You da' Man ! 🎵🎸🔊🙏
That's absolutely make sense, I was wondering for long time, how to get that dynamic sound and this trick with VU meter before plugs -18 just works great..!
Thanks for the knowledge, keep up with the great job!
Thanks for the refresher video. Hello to illfactor your sidekick also. Love his videos.
Great tutorial and teaching Graham, I appreciate it, will definitely put this vital info to use.
Graham, these tutorials are helping me so much! Thank you!
Thanx for the clarification! This is clear now. I working according to this , but now i took the time to think why.
Do i have to put the vu meter in the channel's fx bin and then adjust the trim or gain knob to get the right signal that is 0 is -18 dB ?
I use trim in as the very first plugin in the chain, if i am the recording eng, I adjust the level to that. The main message here, is to use lower volume, and having headroom.
Hi, nu outdoor, when i put vu meter in my fx bin it hardly touch 0 db, so i turn up the gain knob ( using cakewalk sonar ) and then adjust the fader .Is that right ? Or i am doing wrong ? Thanks
I think if it is hardly goes to 0dB it is ok. I use studio one, I am not sure what do you mean gain, if the "gain" is in your trim plugin it is ok.
Thanks for your time. I like that you said learn first, education. I will watch all your videos!
"type in some naughty stuff here" wth? LOL
Klanghelm for the win lol
The plugin lets you type in the track name for example, so that if you have multiple vu meters open, you know which one shows what. Wonderful little plugin, and dirt cheap (holds for all Klanghelm stuff btw -- no brainer purchases). The inclusion of a trimmer pot saves having to use a separate gain plugin, calibration makes it usable in different scenarios, comes with different skins... Very versatile for a simple vu meter.
The "sweet spot for plugins" totally depends on the particular plugin. Some plugins are designed to be hit with -18. Some perform more properly with other target levels.
Most plugins that are modeled after analog gear operate with a -18 sweet spot
VERY clear! Thank you! I feel like such a noob just learning this stuff now, but you pointed it out early, so many of us were simply taught wrong! Recording, FOH, even just playing music, basically EVERYTHING I've ever done sound-wise teaches the same analogue-based signal-to-noise-ratio philosophy!... Hm, a VU meter plugin is in my near future, I think :P lol Thanks again!
I did not know that the vu 0 was -18db. Thanks you since I just downloaded the Klangheim pro VU plugin. Timely info!
Dude thank you for explaining vu full scale!!! I was going nuts with this today!
This video is on the money for the info I was looking for. Thanks man
There are some styles of music that actually rely on saturation, hence you often have to push a quite hot signal into the plugin (unless it has it's own input and output gain stage)
I had to calibrate like this when I was experimenting with "Brauer-izing" In the box (which would be a great tutorial video btw may I recommend) and I did notice the tracks sounding much better. I attributed that to the "Braurer-izing" but now I think it was really the calibration all along.
This was a great video.. thank you!
Thanks Graham!! This is really useful and helpful info, and so well explained!
This is very well done and helpful..
This one was great, my friend! Thank you so much!!!
Thank you for the video! However, many guys here in the comments including me have the same issue which gets adressed very rarely:
When setting the average level to -18dbfs (0 on a -18db calibrated VU), applied to very dynamic instruments, like kick, snare, claps etc... the actual peak goes over 0dbfs very quickly!
There wouldn't be a way for those type of instruments to set an average -18dbfs. In this case i always peak normalize them to max -6dbfs. Even when it is showing -20db on the VU meter and it is peaking at about -6dbfs it is the closest i can get. Is that correct? How are you doing it, Graham?
Its ok to do this in that way for Stuff like Percussion , Drums or very attacky Dynamicly Sounds .Because those Sounds don't have an Average . -10 to -6 dBFS Peak is a good Place to be for that Kind of Sounds :)
This is exactly what I needed! Thanks graham. You are awesome my friend.
two days of looking for at vids that adds up to reality on vu at last,
your my 1st person ive ever give a thumbs up to mate !
this vid dispelled all the conflicting information 100% and put sht straight,
do you have a full tutorial on how you mix from midi to the end .
from bounce down to actual mixing?
id like to see you work
As someone said below -18dbfs is ideal for a large number of plugins, however; there are a fair amount of plugins that are -14dbfs, there are a few UA, (some may even be other levels). I also know Black rooster audio modeled the actual hardware and many of the units run at -14dbfs as well. This is great advice, just making sure people look up the plugins they are using. To my knowledge most Softube and Acustica Audio run @-18 reference as well.
People must read the manuals first but most of them really sounds good when you used -18dbFS.
@@Ninja-pc3gd not all the manuals will inform you of the correct level, you often times have to contact the developers
@@DMarlow83 it's easy, just change the Gain Reduction in the VU Meter to INPUT, if the Needle move/reacts in -20dbFS it's the right gain.
@@DMarlow83 it's easy, just change the Gain Reduction in the VU Meter to 'INPUT', if the Needle move/reacts in -20dbFS then it's the right gain/level.
@@Ninja-pc3gd Yes, this can work for some plugins that have built in VU meters and allow you to see I/O gain and not simply gain reduction levels. It's not an insurmountable task, just making people aware. Some plugins such as pultec style EQs and the like do not have a VU meter on them, so knowing the internal reference level is important as the level of boost or cut will not be uniform to other models (not that they are identical anyways...).
Dude. I learned so much here with this video. Thanks!
Thank you soooo much, I’ve always misunderstood how to use a vu meter, and your explanation is excellent
so its all instruments? highhats, kick drum, vocals piano, bass/808
that has to be in that erea?
Congratulations Graham. Nice explanation. Célio Brasil.
Hi Graham ! and Thank you for this Superb text on "Gain Staging" ! 👌🏿 Tell me, why don't you adjust the "Gain" with the "Trim" of the "VUMT" plugin but rather directly on the audio waveform !? is it not the same ? 🤔🤔 Thank you and again BRAVO for this Excellent work of explanations. Thank you. 🙏🏾
Hey Graham! Big question here,
I recently made the move from Studio One to Cubase, I've been religiously following the digital audio sweet spot rule since you released this video and I thank you for that! I do it on my tracks, and also on my buses! My problem is that while you can select a gain plugin in Studio One (like Mixtool), that changes the actual input volume which is very useful on buses since many sources of audio are going into the same channel, there is no way to do that in Cubase! I do my gain staging, I set up my tracks around -16db RMS, I group them to different buses, which are obviously (like for my Drum Bus) hitting higher than -16RMS, but there is no way to actually lower the input volume of that bus so it's inevitably hitting higher that I'd like to. I know there is a Pre-Gain available on any tracks on Cubase but it actually operates AFTER the Vu Meter of the console, I've noticed that by switching the mode of the Vu. If I lower the pre-gain, the Input gain on my buses remains the same... And I've also noticed that all the plugin chain is also hitting AFTER the Vu Meter. So I'm really confused now since I've been using this technique since a while now and I'm now very enthusiast about seing my buses hitting volumes around 0dB.
Have you ever heard something about this ? Could you give me any advice ?
Thank you for all the great content over the years.
Bastien
Great video & explanation, I remember Kenny Gioia talking about this a while back.
Great information, thanks SO much Graham!
Great explanation on this concept!!!! Thanks million
Hi there, great tutorial, thanks for posting it.
I'd like to ask you, how to gain stage after my song is recorded.
Thanks a lot.
You are the best Graham! Thanks
Still in digital world there is an advantage in recording the highest possible level before distorsion, and the reason is that a higher signal will have a better signal to error ratio after dithering.
Excellent video...thanks for sharing !!!
so I should mix my tracks to roughly -16dbfs to -23dbfs? and master up to -14lufs??
If an instrument is to low on a VU meter do you use a trim plugin to bring it up so it is hitting the 0/ -18 before a waves plugin for example?
Yes.
It seems like now that I'm using this that the compressors are requiring a whole lot more. if I'm at -18 i'm using the MGUC for example; I've got the compression up all the way and i'm getting like 2-3 DB of compression. For some things that's not enough.. I've decided to go to -12 instead but now i'm not in this "sweet spot" so i don't know. This type of calibrations is probably great when doing parallel compression or maybe "Braurerizing" and have multiple instances of compression to where it adds up. I'd like to be able to stay at -18 and still slam a compressor on drums though..?
Why so much headroom for pre master? (-14dbFS (PEAK?)) A mastering engineer can simply turn the track down with no sonic implications. This seems incredible tediously especially considering that if you want to do this right, you must check the dB of every single plugin in the chain! literally. You CANNOT stare at the meters when mixing... If you are mixing with your eyes and not your ears you will get a crappy mix... I'm all for gain staging but as Graham says, do not overthink this. This "Sweetspot" is not going to make your mix sound "warmer" or better. It's just insuring that you have some headroom at the end of the day.
So how do we deal with tracks like tambourines and snares etc? They don't seem to work well with the -18 settings. Thanks
well explain ......thats how it goes indeed ...great teacher big up
Some of what you are saying is incorrect. For example, @8:32 you talk about how you can use the fader to choose a good level for the plugin. That's simply not the case since plugin inserts are pre-fader (the plugin inserts are not affected by the fader level). You can however control plugin gain between plugins. Long story short, I really love your channel and have learned a ton, but I think you need to revisit the subject of prefader/postfader more because I saw some inconsistencies on this subject in your submix/submaster video as well (which someone pointed out).
How about the Re-Amping? What should be the level of the raw guitar DI before the distortion?
Hey Graham, thanks for the video! When should we use gain to boost the signal and when should we use the faders? Is the gain used to get the audio level in the general ballpark and the faders for fine-tuning?
Thanks a lot for this video
It's very important to point out that if you're using a compressor inserted on a channel, and using a gain plugin to trim back to -18dB, that the compressor must go IN FRONT of the gain plugin. Otherwise you''ll be pumping -18db of signal into the compressor and it won't do anything like you'd like it to.
Wow, that leads to more questions than answers... :-O
Great tutorial as expected! :D
Just watched a video by Sean Devine and he shows how digital clipping on individual channels doesn't really matter and it doesn't distort as long as it's taken care of before hitting the mixbus/stereo bus. As long as our output is not clipping, it doesn't distort. He actually export an audio file and shows it. As far as hitting the sweet spot of analog modelled plugins on the way in, Yes it might be right. But is digital clipping on individual channels really a bad thing? As long as you put a VCA before the main out and control it? Appreciate if someone could clarify. Cheers!
There is no clipping in modern DAWs, except usually on the master.
this is only true on 32bit floating point sound engines. the sound engine will take your clipping track and allocate it more bandwidth so that it can go louder without clipping but it will turn DOWN all other tracks to give you this headroom. in other words its a pain in the ass to mixdown on because you focus on a snare going yeah it sounds better louder, louder louder all the while the rest of your mixdown is losing energy without you noticing, then you export at 24bit and wonder why you kick sounds like shit all of a sudden.
@@raedius_music Not true. Post proof if you can find it.
@@WillyJunior if you work on a 24bit channel it will clip in line with he 24bit master bus. If you work on a 32bit channel it will clip the master bus (24bit) before it's own channel clips. Just like you said there is no clipping in modern daes except. On the master. All I'm saying is if your mixing with 32bit floating point channels you will be able to raise the volume ALOT at the expense of the master bus' 24bit fixed point bandwidth. The channels will all show not clipping but to accommodate that very loud 32bits bandwidth the other channels will have to scale Down to accommodate the scaling up of the 32bit channel so they can all fit inside the headroom of 24bits. I will try to find an article, but it's quite easily replicated by just overloading a channel and listening to the mix even though nothing is clipping the surrounding mix elements lose volume, Whereas on 24bit channels eats headroom like analog (fixed point) I'm not explaining it well but I preferred working in the same bit depth of the master bus : it's just easier to see where the bandwidth is being consumed.
@@raedius_music Sure, that's true. The part I wasn't sure about was the rest of the mixdown losing power and the kick sounding bad. I don't know how that could happen under normal circumstances.
So should you put the VU meter in the beginning of the plugin chain or at the end or should you put one in the master mixbus and just run on that?
Thanks for the great video as always, Graham, thanks. I do have a question though, what about the quiet track? How to do the gain staging on the quiet tracks, for example, shaker, .... etc?
So to sum it all up... make sure all of your recorded tracks in your DAW are hitting the sweet spot which is 0 dB VU/- 18 dbfs before adding any plugins right???
I feel like a lot of that extra analog noise has turned into somewhat of an aesthetic touch to some modern music.
Hi, thank you for the great tutorial. Can we use this vu meter on fast transient sounds, how about kick or snares? Thanks!
Thanks a lot mate!
Helpful! Thanks, bro! 🎶🎶
Wow! This video changed my life! lol thank you!
Ah thank you, first time using digital and I am wondering if something is wrong with my interface or mic Steinberg ur22c/ Audio technica at2035 because I really have to pump the gain, but it seems more reasonable if I'm going for -18
Thanks for the tip I will try this on my next songs to mix
There are a few problems with your understanding of DAW sound processing engines. Channels and buses don't clip at 0dB. Clipping only happens when the signal goes to an output device or to file. All modern DAWs use floating point values, 64bit and in practice, it's impossible to clip them. There was (is?) a version of Pro Tools that still used integer based values so they may clip. How plugins work is a case by case situation.
spoddie i hope people read your comment. and even more important, graham does! cause he has so many people following and believing him. but in this case he himself is wrong..
Indeed it's not the DAW that has a sweet spot, it's the plugins, and for those it's not guaranteed to be -18dB RMS. More people should read your comment and Graham should probably clear things up in a new video.
Fantastic advice, Graham!
Great explanation. Just one question, what about very percussive sound waves like kick drum or snare? What is the optimum peak level en digital world? I guess -18DbFS RMS doesn't account for this kind of instruments. Thank you! Cheers from Argentina.
I’m using logic , when I use VU meter plugin and gain stage everything instruments/vocals pre fader to -18dbfs on VU meter, then when I look at my master channel it’s clipping every now and then, do I just lower each individual tracks when I’m gain staging until I reach about -6db on the master channel ?
If so from there when I start using plug-ins do I just level match it throughout the whole mixing process so when I reach the end of my mixing, my master channel should be about -3 - -6 db ?
So in terms of getting analog signal to digital, would you have your input signal coming in at -18, or would you rather record each track "as loud as possible" and then adjust each take's individual volume to be around -18?
In theory you'd still want to record the takes as loud as possible to get a good signal/noise ratio, right?
And then bring the volume of the take back down in the daw - which then should bring the noise level down also.
What if you tracked using RMS between 20-15? Using this Klanghelm VUMT has standard -18db and also has RMS Meter +3dB shouldn’t I use the VUMT RMS? But what is the sweet spot on this plugin RMS meter? Is it still 0 where the red is? Or is it around -12 in the black? Ty
what difference is put gain plugin - vu meter - other plugins -gain plugin - chain to track and set volumes DAW track levels 0dBFS then doing rough mix using chain last gain plugin and accurate with daw mixer? Or don´t touch daw mixer at all only set volumes using gain plugin? I´m very interest about this. Tell me please
Excellent Video 🙌🏾
Thanks Graham, you are a great guy and I love your videos, but some things you said are nothing but myths. I suppose it is just semantics, but let me add that a DAW does not care about our recording levels as long as the signal is not clipped on the converter. There is an infinite headroom in the 64bit floating point environment so this only applies to no linear plugins such as compressors and saturators, and here I believe is the semantics I mentioned earlier.
To be completely clear, your advice here is great but it has nothing to do with the DAW, but with the plugins, and only some of the plugins.
7:56 answered my question . thank u Graham !!! sweetspot
@recordingrevolution I record with low signals and then i trim with VUMT meter to trim up for the sweet spot, is ok this process?
4:39 Those bouncing needles!! 😂😂😂😂
very useful and well explained
Graham, just a quick question: The -18db rule would apply to your busses as well, because when audio is sent to say, your drum buss, it can cumulatively cause that buss to hit levels hotter than -18db. And since the instrument and vocal busses feed into the main master buss, it would make sense to ensure that those busses are also hovering around or a bit more than the -18db mark, otherwise you end up 'crowding' the master buss with hot levels.
Mekaal Hasan -18 is an average source signal level to send to your plugins. The level into the mix bus should be around -6 before processing is added to the mix bus. You can achieve this by adjusting your faders after your plugins have been added.
Microphones aren't digital. It's still imperative you record at a level that there's no noise, too, in that situation. So, using a daw, Noise floor is something else to talk about within digital recording, too, not for digital compnents, but for analog ones.
So is there a sweet spot for the post effects audio? Like what should the ideal level be?
When I set the average levels of my audio to be at -18dBFS and around 0VU, its peaks are rise above 0dBFS. what should I do? I read some comments that DAW has much more headroom above 0dBFS, should I just ignore that peak in gain staging phase (pre fader)? or should I just lower the gain regardless of the VU meter until my peak in appropriate level ?
Use a limiter.
Thanks, Graham, you help me so much!!!