I was recently loaned one of these, and it's one of the most amazing lenses I've ever used. After a career spanning over 40 years, I discovered M43, but I'd already wrecked my back by then! Now officially retired, I'm enjoying my photography more than ever, thanks to olympus and lumix
I absolutely agree, and am planning on getting this lens soon. Last night I took some amazing pictures of my nephew at a midnight track meet with my 45mm f1.8. The guy next to me had a huge canon setup and was so frustrated with the lighting, I put my Olympus in shutter mode and snapped away. We compared photos and he couldn’t believe that my little sensor took much better photos than his full frame canon. Stick to what works and thanks for the great videos robin. You make me try to be a better photographer
The 45mm f/1.8 is a small telephoto in disguise. So unobtrusive. I took shots at a wedding party with it two weeks ago. Indoors and it worked very well in that situation. Some of the lenses seem to be discounted quite heavily right now. The 75mm 17mm and 25mm f/1.8 as well as the 45mm/1.8 and the old 12-40mm f/2.8 too. I'm wondering if old Olympus branded stock is being offloaded before they change the branding to OM System.
Absolutely my go-to lens for small stage photography. I recently was able to take great images in a very poorly lit and cramped venue, which I don’t believe I could’ve done with any other lens and camera set-up. I wish the focusing ring had a little more resistance, but I have no complaints about this lens. it is truly a marvel - even so many years after it was introduced.
Robin，I love your passionate explanation. It was your article from many years ago that made me get this lens, and I'm still using it. It has captured countless wonderful photos of me and my family, and because of it, I will always stay with the M43 system. Thank you so much!
I just bought a second hand 75mm about 3 weeks ago. Together with EM5 Mark3, Pro Capture and Aperture mode wide open, I managed to get shots of pigeons taking off in the town of Ipoh and storks gliding over Bandar Tasik Permaisuri, KL. Lens was based on recommendation of your prior video - no regrets at all ! I saw a fellow photographer that day in Permaisuri though. The lens he carried was almost as long as half the length the tripod and he was lugging it around. I get what you meant about heavy gears when shooting, it's not Aperture Priority, not Shutter Priority, it's Health Priority ! 😅
I recently bought a Nikon Z7 and I thought I would ditch my Olympus OM I mark II. However to my surprise I still use my Olympus at least 50% of the time and in particular, the 75 mil 1.8 lens. A truly remarkable lens that produces brilliant results and as you commented, I don’t have to suffer back strain carrying heavy lenses around for the Z7.
Same here. EXCEEDED MY EXPECTATIONS. I’ve used Various camera systems ( Leica and MEDIUM Format) in combination with pro lenses. For professional work. THIS LENS is by far the SHARPEST LENS I’VE EVER USED. ABSOLUTELY INCREDIBLE!
This lens is so pleasing both in IQ but also in how it feels. I used to own one of those big 70-200 2.8 (Nikon DSLR) and it produced beautiful images but it was way too big to carry around and cost way too much money (then it broke and cost me another huge chunk of money). I am so happy to have switched to Olympus and that switched was totally influenced by you. Thank you! Keep up the great work!
Definitely agree. This lens is pretty much a must-have if you're trying to do any serious low-light event work with m43. It's been essential for me for the last few years.
Got one of the these packaged in with a Pen-F I bought on discount. Its sat their sealed as I didn't really think it was for me, I even considered selling. My Dad linked me to Robin's TH-cam... now I've broken that seal and am going to take this lens with me on holiday very soon. Thanks for your passion Robin!
I’m with you. The fast, super-high-quality prime lenses for MFT negate nearly every advantage of FF. And being able to get the depth of field you need at f1.8 is a huge advantage in low light. Long live MFT!
Shallow depth of field in normal and wide angle shots is the main reason we choose FF. You can achieve this telephoto bokeh regardless of the sensor size, including 1 inch.
It's a double edged sword. If you want LESS depth of field to blur the background and isolate the subject FF obviously wins, if you want MORE depth of field in order to help nail your shot better then MFT has an advantage there. Theoretically. There's no free lunch in photography, everything's a tradeoff.
@@ryankwan1934 yep. telephoto shots is the area where smaller sensor shines. To exaggerate my point: imagine something equivalent to FF's 150-600 on medium format world. Bigger image sensor = bigger lens, we can't avoid physics.
@@sheldonspock5566 for sure. I find the fast MFT primes give me adequately shallow DOF when I want it, too. But, it takes a little different technique and planning of the shot.
I crushed a few vertebrae in my back and that’s what drove me to M4/3. People tend to ignore the lens size, especially on the telephoto end, when they compare camera bodies and declare there is no size advantage to M4/3. For someone that likes to photograph birds, that size advantage is huge. Yes, you can probably get a higher resolution full frame, use a shorter lens and crop. But why pay for the larger sensor and glass and for the extra megapixels and glass if you are only going to use a portion of them? Thanks for continuing to show people that there is life beyond full frame. We need to ensure the format survives so folks like us continue to have options.
@@WOLFTICKVIDEOS i do also, but I would prefer an option like a twin lens, square sensored medium format. Something like a digital Rolleiflex or Yashica Mat. It would be great for portraits and landscapes. Too bad they don’t make something like that. I would still use M4/3 for birds or sports. One thing I also noticed is that the m4/3 lenses are sharper than even the Nikon Pro lenses I had in the past. You can never have too many cameras or lenses as a photographer.
You enthusiasm is just awesome Robin! You remain an excellent source of energy and technical expertise!! OMD has missed out on an immense flow of positive and beneficial influence!!!
Hi Robin I love your enthusiasm for photography and micro 4/3. I too have considered full frame but cannot justify the extra size, weight and cost. I believe that as sensor technology gets better and better, the issues of smaller sensors will become less and less of a problem. Best wishes. Paul
I have and still use my original Zuiko 4/3 50mm f/2.0 Macro lens with an m4/3 adapter on my micro 4/3 cameras. This lens is slightly somewhat large by today's m4/3 standards, but it's still one of the sharpest and most perfect lenses I've ever owned. If you read any legitimate review of this lens, you will see what I am saying is completely true. I paid $399 for it somewhere around 2009 (on sale from $499) and I will never part with it. It truly is essentially a perfect lens with all aberrations and/or distortions totally corrected by its original design. I mention this for those photographers who have never had the opportunity to use a virtually perfect lens. If you can find one still in excellent condition, I would strongly suggest you buy it. I guarantee it will amaze it you as an alternative to the fine m.Zuiko 75mm f/1.8 lens, but they are definitely in two different categories, the 50mm Macro falling into the simply "incredible" category. I've seen them for sale on eBay from $300 to about $600, and if you can find one in excellent condition, I guarantee you will not be disappointed - it's simply such an awesome lens for portraits, Macro and short telephoto images. As you can see, I'm still in love with mine even after all the years I've had it!
This was one of the first lenses I tried when I started using Olympus great. I used it extensively for my trips to Thailand and Cambodia back then, it's an absolutely fantastic lens... It's funny how some FF guys say, 135 f/2 is not enough, we need 135 f/1.8 even 1.4, bright as much as possible... Oly 75mm it's such a gem, small, portable, light and very very good, it has so pleasing aesthetics... Often I use 40-150 f/2.8 PRO for convenience, but 75mm is in a league of its own. If they're making a Mark II version just please add weather sealing, manual clutch and coating on the front lens, everything else is perfect at the moment!
Well done robin you made the right choice. I have a Nikon d700 full frame it kills me to Carry around and I'm only 48. My omd em5 in mkiii is a joy to use . Light good lens like the 75mm are the way to go.
The 75mm 1.8 is my favorite lens of all. It’s so beautiful. I often find myself lingering in the viewfinder just enjoying the beauty and perfection of the frame. I really, really, really love my 60mm macro lens and have so much fun with it but, if I had to choose only one lens to shoot with, it would definitely be the 75mm.
been lusting after this for years, a couple months ago I finally found a mint condition one at a very reasonable price.... and all I can say is it exceed my expectations... love it while I have a fair fortune invested in Canon gear shooting mostly MFT these days due to ongoing cancer treatment leaving me unable to lug about anything other than a Canon FF body and 24-105 lens.... or a MFT camera and 5 lenses
I was so excited about this lens but for $900 US, I couldn't buy it immediately but heard so many good things. A couple months ago OM did a lens discount on some of their lenses and the 75mm 1.8 dropped down to $600 and had to get it cause I didn't know if they were going to do a discount like this again! I'm living abroad and because this was from the North American market, it could only ship to U.S. so I'm really looking forward to going back to the states to use it and do pet portraits! Great video, Robin!
I wonder if they are clearing the existing Olympus branded stock. Price has dropped at a time of rampant inflation. It's a little strange. I grabbed one brand new for under 500 GBP just last week. Plus the "old" first version of the 12-40mm f/2.8 is discounted quite heavily and it's not old really. It's only just been updated to the Mark ii. Other lenses have been marked down too, like the 60mm f/2.8 Macro.
@@davebellamy4867 That’s what I was thinking, they only promoted this sales through email so it seemed to me they are trying to cash out on theses lenses. Cause they had the $300 off the 75mm 1.8 twice within two months within each other. Some people were hoping to update the 1.8 lenses into a version 2.0. Hopefully they still have silver options
It is my favourite lens really. Not versatile, but for the right uses, it is absolutely perfect. It doesn't hurt that it looks so classy with the compact size and huge front element :)
The fact the thing looks and feels so awesome makes me want to use it and find ways to use it. Got one last week, took it out in the garden, sent the photos to a friend and he just said wow.
The old Olympus 85mm f/2 and 100mm f/2 lenses were drop dead gorgeous but this 75mm f/1.8 is off the scale. One weird thing is that the old 85mm f/2 is even smaller, has only a 49mm filter thread and fits in the old Olympus standard camera cases! This shows how ahead of their time the Olympus designers were in the 1980s.
thanks for this video. you just described why this lens is so perfect. Instead of music gigs I often fotograph other events. Knowing to keep the necessary distance and to be still close enough because of the fact, to hold a tele lens in hand, is a big benefit. And man, this lens is sharp!!!
Yes, it’s a gem! I completely agree with your thoughts on this lens! After renting one, I was hooked ! Frankly, it mounts & works beautifully on my Pen-f as well as the larger bodies. As a geezer, the extra focal length & compact nature of the lens is very convenient. Consider school performance venues & ice rinks etc where grandchildren play & compete, and lighting can be tricky, and the M43 combo really shines! Nice concert photos and good tips, Robin! Thx!
I used to use this so much until I bought the 45 f1.2, now it stays on my camera most the time and I zoom with my feet. 75 still has its place, but the 45 just adds another level of beauty to photos :-)
Thank you Robin. I've just invested in the OM-D E-5 Mark III, mainly for it's stabilisation and phase autofocus. Now looking at this lens as I'm taking photos for my niece's wedding soon and will mainly be shooting indoors and discreetly.
I have to admit that even if I went to medium format or FF, I would still keep at least one M43 body just so I could continue to use this lens. It's that good.
You are completely right. I own the 75mm 1.8 for some years now and made a lot of amazing shots with it. It's maybe my favourite lens. Nevertheless I notice a small drop in sharpness, comparing f1.8 to f2.0 - at least with my copy of the lens. So I close to f2.0 whenever possible.
Thank you Robin, for your great work. I follow you now at least some years and you have been and still are a absolute amazing and sympathic inspiration. While I had a few big lenses like the 12-100pro or the Pana Leica 100-400 and still have the 40-150 2.8 and I miss the former two for some reason I really do unterstand what you are telling with my own experience led to same conclusions. Honestly it is pretty lovely how we still can move level ups in skills after shooting some years. As I shot some weddings with the 40-150mm and the 25mm 1.2 (almost not used the 12-40 2.8) I really would have loved the 75mm 1.8 instead the Tele-Zoom. I loved the Frames it gave me, but struggled with lights inside church p.e. just for the best possible constant picture quality. So, thanks again for your Sharing and I love that you keep going with mft, I really was a littled afraid, you could let the system down and I enjoy now this awesome system ongoing hopefully with much more from you. :) Thank you, Robin.
I’ve been shooting my friends’ jazz-fusion band in concerts for years, starting w my Canon FF bodies and L lenses. So I know full well about the cumbersome weight AND bulkiness. I sold 90% of it after deciding that Olympus’ MFT was the best system for my new bird and wildlife focus. Now that their band is preparing for their farewell concert in LA, I’m thinking that I should add the 75mm f/1.8 to my bag, because my 40-150 f/2.8 won’t be bright enough. I just bought the 17 f/1.2 and 25 f/1.2 (used) but now you’ve got me sniffing around for the 75.
I just came back to do photography after a 15 years break, i sold my APSC and full frame Nikon and discovered the MFT. I like your videos and your enthusiasm. Keep going!
Extra tip: wear ear-plugs. Not just for your hearing sake, but open areas near the stage are usually near the speakers because people without ear plugs cant get comfortably close. But if you have ear-plugs, you can be right next to the speaker with no discomfort, and get some great shots.
I did have people gushing over my Olympus 75mm photos unlike any other lens I used. The contrast between the butter smooth out-of-focus backgrounds and ultra sharp focus on the subject, really give the images a 3D look.
The 75mm and 12mm are on my lens bucket list. So of course I bought the 8-18 when my local camera store had a sale. But I WILL get this lens at some point. Great overview of why this has a such a cool lens. I keep an old Nikon 135mm f/2.8 for similar reasons.
The 75mm will SHOCK a you. I remember looking at the images after the using the Olympus 75mm for the very first time.I looked at all my pro full frame portrait lenses and said NO MORE. IT’S ONE OF these “ aha” moments that we get photography that literally changes EVERYTHING.
Couldn't agree with you more Robin.. Even the great M43 detractor Tony Northrup said he used a 75 1.8 over a Full frame in the mid 2010s. I remember saving to buy a Nikon Mount 135mm 1.8 in the 70s ..it was 4 times larger than this lens. I have regretted not buying the Olympus instead of buying things like gimballs and external recorders that I almost never use. Originally, I was trying to get the insanely expensive 42.5mm 1.2 Pana Leica, but just couldn't justify the cost. Then I got caught up in the bokeh hoopla and got the Sigma 56mm 1.4 for the bigger aperture. The Sigma has never let me down for sharpness,, but nothing matches the Olympus colors. A true perfect lens.
@@seth094978 Hi Seth.. that would be really hard for me to judge since I only had a bit of contact with the 75 mm. No side by side comparisons. I will say that the color on the 56 Sigma is fantastic and I've never been let down by the sharpness that I can tell. Also if you are in say a standard house sized room trying to do portraits the 75 might be too long.. but if you do things like Robin does where he shoots stage presentations the extra telephoto could be an advantage. Keep in mind it's 150 mm equivalent in full frame.
Agree 100%. MFT is the maximum size for a versatile system that can go anywhere, anytime, in all conditions. Now, Robin, someday, please show us what you do in post to overcome the shortcomings of MFT.
Your burst of explosive energy and enthusiasm in your videos never seizes to amuse me :D I'm all for small, light and compact myself, so I stick to the m4/3 system. I had a big bulky FF camera once and was sitting on a shelf collecting dust, so I sold it. Also, what you say about moment vs iso, iq etc is SO TURE! I have university photos of VGA resolution taken from nokia phones of the 2000-2005 era that still bring a smile on my face when i look at them, because I see past the horrible resolution and re-leave the moments. Unfortunately all this pixel-peeping frenziness you get from everywhere these days has us forget what matters most in a photograph, which is, as you very correctly put it, the moment! Great vids btw, keep it up!
There is a lot more to full frame telephotos than the 70-200. 135 prime lenses come to mind. Having said that, I do own the Olympus 75 1.8 and it’s a killer lens, and especially well-suited for live event stage work.
One reason I'm sitting on my gear and haven't jumped to Nikon (until Canon releases the RF line from its lock and key that isn't even an option for me) or Sony is the lens I used the most when out and about, the PanaLeica 12-60, would cost 1000 plus just to replace the lens not even counting the cost of the body to get a 24-120mm. The Nikon S 24-120 is a great lens, but the price and size of the overall kit doesn't really make me want to swap. The a7c almost did tbh, but again 1800 bucks for a body that takes a lot of the parts you would notice immediately from 800-dollar bodies is kind of steep (and the 24-105 is even more expensive than the Nikon, similar used give or take). It doesn't help I was able to snag a collection of PanaLeica lenses from a friend jumping ship (to APS-C lol, he wanted to keep some crop factor while getting the Sony E mount to work with his a7iiis for work, so he got an A6600 and uses it for work and hobby) all in great shape for less than the price of what the Leica 42.5 1.2 goes for on the low end. I like my lenses, I like my GX85 and GX8, I like my results, I'm content.
I love mine. Focuses fast too. Great for kids sports and a lot easier to handle than a big 300mm or longer. Just think the reach of this lens is 150mm which is almost what my wife gets on her FF with a big heavy 200mm which only does 2.8.
The 35-100 f2.8 was my favorite one on m43 but this 75mm was the lens which gave me the most beautiful picts for sure but quite hard to use because of the range.
Other than not being fully weather sealed and a relatively long min focus distance, it’s a remarkable lens. It works well for low light wildlife work from hides and long astrophotography sessions as well.
This is the best Olympus lens and the only lens that comes close to it is the sigma 60 mm 2.8. Not a 1.8 lens, but a very affordable and very sharp lens as an alternative to the 75mm. There is also a newer Sigma portrait lens with 1.4 and that is a real consideration for MFT cameras . Lovely review Robin and and an excellent video
@@qfapodcastabouthowardstern I can understand that . The 60 or 55 sigma are portrait lenses with little advantage for any other use . When I want a portrait lens that does what you classically would do with a lens between 80-135 in 35mm terms delivers , then those sigmas shine ; just as the 75 1.8 . Of course, you can use 35-60 for portraits as well, but you have to watch the distortion at the wide end and the limitation to blur backgrounds at the other . That said , I know many who prefer 35 or 55 for that sort of work where space is restricted to use a lens more traditionally associated with portraiture .
Dang it Robin! You are going to get everyone buying these on Ebay, and I was trying to get a good deal.😆 Such a good and enthusiastic review though👌. Thank You👍
Hey Robin, It's a great lens though it has one issue. AF can struggle in bad light quite a bit. I really wish Olympus releases a PRO update. Something like 75mm 1.4 PRO. Cheers
After 3 years of panasonic G9, I bought a sony a7c with kit zoom and pancake lenses, for shorter focal lengths the size and bulk add is negligible. I recently had a lot of fun shooting a concert with a Canon FD 135mm f2.8 lens which is tiny. Ironically my main argument for the sony was the autofocus, and i chose to shoot with a manual lens that night ;) this 75mm 1.8 sounds quite interesting!
Hi from Italy. I have a friend that was injuried from a full frame sensor camera. He was hit by his girlfriend, in the head, with a 400mm metal telephoto lens. Now he also struggles to speak. The world of micro four thirds would have saved his life. Thank you
I would love to own the Olympus 75mm F1.4 lens but I got a great buy on a Panasonic 56mm F1.4. This Sigma lens is light, smaller than the Olympus 75mm lens, has great clarity and bokeh. The 75mm of course has better reach for your live stage performances.
Robin I love your enthusiasm and excitement, it so great man! 🤩 you video is wonderful 👆 the DOF with MFT or perhaps just with 75mm f/1.8 is not the same for example as the Sony 135 f/1.8 GM - I do prefer the SONY 135mm GM look. ...with that said i still do like the MFT DOF. I have made the jump to full frame from MFT but i still own my GH5 (MFT) & a couple of awesome lenses. A few reasons I jumped in MFT System are: 1⃣ better price point 2⃣ size, the smaller camera & lenses 3⃣ video quality, outstanding I would like the the 135 f/1.8 GM from Sony. A few things are making me pause: 1⃣weight (it is bit heavy but not super heavy). 2⃣size - if it is too big a lens i might not use as much as i would if smaller. 3⃣ price - an expensive lens MFT system a couples of somethings I do not like: 1⃣ not the best in low light (I do not want to add glass as with speed booster) 2⃣ MF is not get especially if filming solo - this was big point for myself, if behind the camera no problem though. 👆 Robin, you concert photos are crazy fantastic, love them. Were those images right from camera or did you touch up in LightRoom? Not totally sure what I will do in terms of MFT or Full Frame lens with 75 or 135 but for sure I am more informed thanks to you Robin!
@@robinwong The focusing precision of this lens makes taking portraits really pleasant, sharpness every time! I've had the 75mm 1.8 and the Nokton 42.5 before. I won't go back for the portraits. It is a photo lens that has gone unnoticed on TH-cam. I don't know why.
Ordered this lens yesterday along with the hood and it will be arriving at my doorstep by this weekend. Can't wait to use it and compare it to my Sony 135mm 2.8 STF lens.
35mm conversion 150mm aperture F3.6 They're really beautiful lenses The minimum focal length is short, and I'm very satisfied with it(In Korea, where I am, Olympus has withdrawn its business, so we cannot buy new products😢)
Kind of agreed with you Robin. I have been bringing a modern full frame with zoom lens on my Europe trip. Overall its still bulky and heavy for me. I'm a bokeh boy, so most street photograph was in 75mm. After watched your videos, I resurrected my 10yrs old EP1, bought a 2nd hand 45mmf1.8. Took a KL street photography trip again, and it's feel fantastic & lightweight! Street people won't scare/aware at all, when I pointing toward them. ( they might thought I'm shooting building since 90mm.equ was far away from ). Thank you Robin! Hope you keep your passion on m43 like I do. Cheers.
The old Olympus 85mm f/2 and 100mm f/2 lenses were drop dead gorgeous but this 75mm f/1.8 is off the scale. One weird thing is that the old 85mm f/2 is even smaller, has only a 49mm filter thread and fits in the old Olympus standard camera cases! This shows how ahead of their time the Olympus designers were in the 1970s.
Just took M.Zuiko 75mm F1.8 to studio photoshoot. I pitted it against Lumix Leica Summilux 25mm F1.4 II and M.Zuiko 45mm F1.8. I used combination of studio lights with two of my Olympus flashes over RC, so there was plenty of light and I could shoot at F2,8 at each lens - when they are the sharpest. 75mm F1.8 definitely took the best shot of the evening :) It was little bit impractical to use it inside for studio work on a tripod. 45mm F1.8 was a great all rounder in this type of work. 25mm F1.4 Was a bit of a disappointment at start, but at the end of photoshoot i realized that it works best when i remove the camera from the tripod. Been telling myself to sell it because its not used often, but then I take to a studio and the results are always breathtaking.
This lens has been on my wish list for a few years now. I'm coming into a little bit of extra money in a month or two and I'll be taking the plunge then. It helps that there is an excellent camera shop here in Tokyo with an excellent selection of used gear - Fujiya Camera. I can get this beast for about 54,000 yen which is $400 with extremely minor scratches on the metal casing, but the optics are still perfect.
Do it. I waited for ages. Something made me flip the switch last week: LOWER PRICES!🤣😂😅 It's about the only thing that's cheaper to buy new right now than a couple of years ago. Or secondhand is fine, especially if you can try it out in a shop first.
I've noticed lower prices on some of the nicer lenses and also there seem to be some dealers offloading new old stock. The first version 12-40mm f/2.8 is one example but the 75mm f/1.8 has also come down. I wonder if old OLYMPUS branded lenses are being offloaded to make way for the OM SYSTEM branded lenses like the new 12-40mm f/2.8. Personally I would prefer the Olympus name on it anyway. I just grabbed both lenses and now I'm poor! Really but they are a big step up for me in my photography, which I love. I'm skimping in other areas.
Black or chrome? Not that it matters. I got chrome as Robin said he can distinguish it easily in his camera bag in low light. Plus it's badass. Both are.
@@davebellamy4867 In January, I got the 12-40 f/2.8 with a single cosmetic scratch on the metal exterior, but optically, it's perfect. Honestly, I was tempted to get the 75 instead, since they were nearly the same price. I got the zoom and it's my first Zuiko pro and I'm more than happy with it, but I wish I had enough to get both at the time.
@@davebellamy4867 I don't really care about the color, the camera shop I go to here in Tokyo will usually have used chrome/silver more often than the black. I'll take whichever one is in the best condiction.
Lots of good advice (close, move, emotions, etc.). I once took the Pen F in my jacket pocket, the 75/1.8 in my pant-pocket, and binoculars around my neck -- to a high celebrity concert where photo was banned. The guards were distracted by the binoculars, and didn't check further, so I managed to get the Pen F and the 75/1.8 into the concert hall. Unfortunately, with a distance of some 100 m to the stage, the photos were poor. This summer, I went to a jazz concert. The artist welcomed photos, but the arranger banned photos. The guards didn't check my back pack, and I could bring in my camera + 40-150/2.8. The distance was ca. 50 m, with no possibility to move. Somewhat static pictures, and I wish I had had the TC14 with me. I used spot exposure, with ISO in the range of 200-2000. My examples are meant to illustrate the importance of getting close to the stage. With the distance I had, I couldn't get close-ups, and couldn't change the angle. So OK pictures the 40-150/2.8, but not great. -- A final comment on WB. A couple of weeks ago, I attended a restaurant with live music, and used the 20/1.4 -- ok, because I could get close. The problem was very red color in the lights, which (i) reduced contrast and made it difficult to focus, and (ii) quite difficult to fix colors in post. Question: do you fix colors in post processing, or try to set the WB before taking pictures?
I bought this lens with the originalOMD-EM5 I am surprised at the quality of the lens without stopping down2 to3 stops the out of focus with'bokeh' effects rival the 'doughnuts' of the mirror lenses , which tend to be heavier and donot have auto focussing,& have to be shot on aperture priority. This lens is the ideal portrait lens with 'ambient lighting' and will give pleasing results.
Agree with you. Weight/size are reasons I love MFT so much. This afternoon played with my Nikon full frame dslr and 24-70 2.8. Can’t believe how I used to using them whole day without hurting myself!
Hi Robin, I do have this lens. Great as you said. Olympus is for about one year my backup system only. Because I moved to Canon fullframe. Why not Sony? I first had a used Sony A7 III. The choice of lenses is great. But the handling of Sony ( for example menu) was bad. Canon is simpler in my opinion. So I took the RP. Sympathic in use. You are a much more experienced photographer than I. Canon or Sony are leading in fullframe. So it is a question of money too. I decided only to buy used equipment. One way to go...
I was recently loaned one of these, and it's one of the most amazing lenses I've ever used. After a career spanning over 40 years, I discovered M43, but I'd already wrecked my back by then! Now officially retired, I'm enjoying my photography more than ever, thanks to olympus and lumix
Robin, you are one of the smartest and most accurate photography teachers on youtube, thank you and keep it up.
Amen to that!
I second that!! Helped me with my m4/3 camera tremendously.
I absolutely agree, and am planning on getting this lens soon. Last night I took some amazing pictures of my nephew at a midnight track meet with my 45mm f1.8. The guy next to me had a huge canon setup and was so frustrated with the lighting, I put my Olympus in shutter mode and snapped away. We compared photos and he couldn’t believe that my little sensor took much better photos than his full frame canon. Stick to what works and thanks for the great videos robin. You make me try to be a better photographer
The 45mm f/1.8 is a small telephoto in disguise. So unobtrusive. I took shots at a wedding party with it two weeks ago. Indoors and it worked very well in that situation. Some of the lenses seem to be discounted quite heavily right now. The 75mm 17mm and 25mm f/1.8 as well as the 45mm/1.8 and the old 12-40mm f/2.8 too. I'm wondering if old Olympus branded stock is being offloaded before they change the branding to OM System.
Absolutely my go-to lens for small stage photography. I recently was able to take great images in a very poorly lit and cramped venue, which I don’t believe I could’ve done with any other lens and camera set-up. I wish the focusing ring had a little more resistance, but I have no complaints about this lens. it is truly a marvel - even so many years after it was introduced.
Robin，I love your passionate explanation. It was your article from many years ago that made me get this lens, and I'm still using it. It has captured countless wonderful photos of me and my family, and because of it, I will always stay with the M43 system. Thank you so much!
I just bought a second hand 75mm about 3 weeks ago. Together with EM5 Mark3, Pro Capture and Aperture mode wide open, I managed to get shots of pigeons taking off in the town of Ipoh and storks gliding over Bandar Tasik Permaisuri, KL. Lens was based on recommendation of your prior video - no regrets at all !
I saw a fellow photographer that day in Permaisuri though. The lens he carried was almost as long as half the length the tripod and he was lugging it around. I get what you meant about heavy gears when shooting, it's not Aperture Priority, not Shutter Priority, it's Health Priority ! 😅
I recently bought a Nikon Z7 and I thought I would ditch my Olympus OM I mark II. However to my surprise I still use my Olympus at least 50% of the time and in particular, the 75 mil 1.8 lens. A truly remarkable lens that produces brilliant results and as you commented, I don’t have to suffer back strain carrying heavy lenses around for the Z7.
Same here. EXCEEDED MY EXPECTATIONS. I’ve used Various camera systems ( Leica and MEDIUM Format) in combination with pro lenses. For professional work. THIS LENS is by far the SHARPEST LENS I’VE EVER USED. ABSOLUTELY INCREDIBLE!
This lens is so pleasing both in IQ but also in how it feels. I used to own one of those big 70-200 2.8 (Nikon DSLR) and it produced beautiful images but it was way too big to carry around and cost way too much money (then it broke and cost me another huge chunk of money). I am so happy to have switched to Olympus and that switched was totally influenced by you. Thank you! Keep up the great work!
Definitely agree. This lens is pretty much a must-have if you're trying to do any serious low-light event work with m43. It's been essential for me for the last few years.
Got one of the these packaged in with a Pen-F I bought on discount. Its sat their sealed as I didn't really think it was for me, I even considered selling. My Dad linked me to Robin's TH-cam... now I've broken that seal and am going to take this lens with me on holiday very soon. Thanks for your passion Robin!
Stunning lens, and the more I watch this, the more I agree. Has nailed every indoor stage shot that I have taken. I share your experience, Robin!
Agree completely! The 75 f/1.8 has some magic going on, thanks for spotlighting it, Robin!
I’m with you. The fast, super-high-quality prime lenses for MFT negate nearly every advantage of FF. And being able to get the depth of field you need at f1.8 is a huge advantage in low light. Long live MFT!
Shallow depth of field in normal and wide angle shots is the main reason we choose FF. You can achieve this telephoto bokeh regardless of the sensor size, including 1 inch.
It's a double edged sword. If you want LESS depth of field to blur the background and isolate the subject FF obviously wins, if you want MORE depth of field in order to help nail your shot better then MFT has an advantage there. Theoretically. There's no free lunch in photography, everything's a tradeoff.
@@ryankwan1934 yep. telephoto shots is the area where smaller sensor shines. To exaggerate my point: imagine something equivalent to FF's 150-600 on medium format world. Bigger image sensor = bigger lens, we can't avoid physics.
@@sheldonspock5566 for sure. I find the fast MFT primes give me adequately shallow DOF when I want it, too. But, it takes a little different technique and planning of the shot.
I crushed a few vertebrae in my back and that’s what drove me to M4/3. People tend to ignore the lens size, especially on the telephoto end, when they compare camera bodies and declare there is no size advantage to M4/3. For someone that likes to photograph birds, that size advantage is huge. Yes, you can probably get a higher resolution full frame, use a shorter lens and crop. But why pay for the larger sensor and glass and for the extra megapixels and glass if you are only going to use a portion of them? Thanks for continuing to show people that there is life beyond full frame. We need to ensure the format survives so folks like us continue to have options.
My problem is that I like all of the formats.😉📸
@@WOLFTICKVIDEOS i do also, but I would prefer an option like a twin lens, square sensored medium format. Something like a digital Rolleiflex or Yashica Mat. It would be great for portraits and landscapes. Too bad they don’t make something like that. I would still use M4/3 for birds or sports. One thing I also noticed is that the m4/3 lenses are sharper than even the Nikon Pro lenses I had in the past. You can never have too many cameras or lenses as a photographer.
You enthusiasm is just awesome Robin! You remain an excellent source of energy and technical expertise!! OMD has missed out on an immense flow of positive and beneficial influence!!!
Hi Robin
I love your enthusiasm for photography and micro 4/3. I too have considered full frame but cannot justify the extra size, weight and cost. I believe that as sensor technology gets better and better, the issues of smaller sensors will become less and less of a problem.
Best wishes.
Paul
I have and still use my original Zuiko 4/3 50mm f/2.0 Macro lens with an m4/3 adapter on my micro 4/3 cameras. This lens is slightly somewhat large by today's m4/3 standards, but it's still one of the sharpest and most perfect lenses I've ever owned. If you read any legitimate review of this lens, you will see what I am saying is completely true. I paid $399 for it somewhere around 2009 (on sale from $499) and I will never part with it. It truly is essentially a perfect lens with all aberrations and/or distortions totally corrected by its original design.
I mention this for those photographers who have never had the opportunity to use a virtually perfect lens. If you can find one still in excellent condition, I would strongly suggest you buy it. I guarantee it will amaze it you as an alternative to the fine m.Zuiko 75mm f/1.8 lens, but they are definitely in two different categories, the 50mm Macro falling into the simply "incredible" category.
I've seen them for sale on eBay from $300 to about $600, and if you can find one in excellent condition, I guarantee you will not be disappointed - it's simply such an awesome lens for portraits, Macro and short telephoto images. As you can see, I'm still in love with mine even after all the years I've had it!
The 75mm f/1.8 is my all-time favourite lens. It's magical, it feels like the lens is doing the composition for me!
You are a gem Robin. So enthusiastic and fun. I am so glad you are still giving us Olympus tips.
This was one of the first lenses I tried when I started using Olympus great. I used it extensively for my trips to Thailand and Cambodia back then, it's an absolutely fantastic lens...
It's funny how some FF guys say, 135 f/2 is not enough, we need 135 f/1.8 even 1.4, bright as much as possible...
Oly 75mm it's such a gem, small, portable, light and very very good, it has so pleasing aesthetics...
Often I use 40-150 f/2.8 PRO for convenience, but 75mm is in a league of its own.
If they're making a Mark II version just please add weather sealing, manual clutch and coating on the front lens, everything else is perfect at the moment!
Nearly got this lens but went for the Sigma 56 mm F1.4 both are great lenses. Lovely photos Robin
Well done robin you made the right choice. I have a Nikon d700 full frame it kills me to Carry around and I'm only 48. My omd em5 in mkiii is a joy to use . Light good lens like the 75mm are the way to go.
The 75mm 1.8 is my favorite lens of all. It’s so beautiful. I often find myself lingering in the viewfinder just enjoying the beauty and perfection of the frame. I really, really, really love my 60mm macro lens and have so much fun with it but, if I had to choose only one lens to shoot with, it would definitely be the 75mm.
been lusting after this for years, a couple months ago I finally found a mint condition one at a very reasonable price.... and all I can say is it exceed my expectations... love it while I have a fair fortune invested in Canon gear shooting mostly MFT these days due to ongoing cancer treatment leaving me unable to lug about anything other than a Canon FF body and 24-105 lens.... or a MFT camera and 5 lenses
I was so excited about this lens but for $900 US, I couldn't buy it immediately but heard so many good things. A couple months ago OM did a lens discount on some of their lenses and the 75mm 1.8 dropped down to $600 and had to get it cause I didn't know if they were going to do a discount like this again! I'm living abroad and because this was from the North American market, it could only ship to U.S. so I'm really looking forward to going back to the states to use it and do pet portraits! Great video, Robin!
I wonder if they are clearing the existing Olympus branded stock. Price has dropped at a time of rampant inflation. It's a little strange. I grabbed one brand new for under 500 GBP just last week. Plus the "old" first version of the 12-40mm f/2.8 is discounted quite heavily and it's not old really. It's only just been updated to the Mark ii. Other lenses have been marked down too, like the 60mm f/2.8 Macro.
@@davebellamy4867 That’s what I was thinking, they only promoted this sales through email so it seemed to me they are trying to cash out on theses lenses. Cause they had the $300 off the 75mm 1.8 twice within two months within each other. Some people were hoping to update the 1.8 lenses into a version 2.0. Hopefully they still have silver options
It is my favourite lens really. Not versatile, but for the right uses, it is absolutely perfect. It doesn't hurt that it looks so classy with the compact size and huge front element :)
The fact the thing looks and feels so awesome makes me want to use it and find ways to use it. Got one last week, took it out in the garden, sent the photos to a friend and he just said wow.
The old Olympus 85mm f/2 and 100mm f/2 lenses were drop dead gorgeous but this 75mm f/1.8 is off the scale. One weird thing is that the old 85mm f/2 is even smaller, has only a 49mm filter thread and fits in the old Olympus standard camera cases! This shows how ahead of their time the Olympus designers were in the 1980s.
thanks for this video. you just described why this lens is so perfect. Instead of music gigs I often fotograph other events. Knowing to keep the necessary distance and to be still close enough because of the fact, to hold a tele lens in hand, is a big benefit. And man, this lens is sharp!!!
Yes, it’s a gem! I completely agree with your thoughts on this lens! After renting one, I was hooked ! Frankly, it mounts & works beautifully on my Pen-f as well as the larger bodies. As a geezer, the extra focal length & compact nature of the lens is very convenient. Consider school performance venues & ice rinks etc where grandchildren play & compete, and lighting can be tricky, and the M43 combo really shines! Nice concert photos and good tips, Robin! Thx!
Ironic that I shot an event about an hour ago with this lens. The images it delivers are amazing! Thank you Robin.
Thank you, Robin, for reminding me of how much I love shooting events with this lens! It's truly a gem.
I used to use this so much until I bought the 45 f1.2, now it stays on my camera most the time and I zoom with my feet. 75 still has its place, but the 45 just adds another level of beauty to photos :-)
You zoom with your feet, LOL.
The Oly 75mm f/1.8 has always been awesome. The focal length isn't for everyone and I hardly used mine. But it is a great lens.
I think we have to thank the 75 mm lens that it preserved Robin for us, to our side of fence, thank God for that!
Thank you Robin. I've just invested in the OM-D E-5 Mark III, mainly for it's stabilisation and phase autofocus. Now looking at this lens as I'm taking photos for my niece's wedding soon and will mainly be shooting indoors and discreetly.
Hi Robin, i just got the 75mm... it is truely a gem. First portraits i made with it are immediately winners. You have to have it in your quiver... :-)
Great vidoes, thank you for your enthousiasm!
I use the 75 on a Pen E-PL8. Great looking combo with very nice results!
I'm still a 43 user for the 75mm f1.8 and the 12-100mm F4, those lenses are amazing.
I have to admit that even if I went to medium format or FF, I would still keep at least one M43 body just so I could continue to use this lens. It's that good.
You are completely right. I own the 75mm 1.8 for some years now and made a lot of amazing shots with it. It's maybe my favourite lens. Nevertheless I notice a small drop in sharpness, comparing f1.8 to f2.0 - at least with my copy of the lens. So I close to f2.0 whenever possible.
Thank you Robin, for your great work. I follow you now at least some years and you have been and still are a absolute amazing and sympathic inspiration. While I had a few big lenses like the 12-100pro or the Pana Leica 100-400 and still have the 40-150 2.8 and I miss the former two for some reason I really do unterstand what you are telling with my own experience led to same conclusions. Honestly it is pretty lovely how we still can move level ups in skills after shooting some years. As I shot some weddings with the 40-150mm and the 25mm 1.2 (almost not used the 12-40 2.8) I really would have loved the 75mm 1.8 instead the Tele-Zoom. I loved the Frames it gave me, but struggled with lights inside church p.e. just for the best possible constant picture quality. So, thanks again for your Sharing and I love that you keep going with mft, I really was a littled afraid, you could let the system down and I enjoy now this awesome system ongoing hopefully with much more from you. :) Thank you, Robin.
I’ve been shooting my friends’ jazz-fusion band in concerts for years, starting w my Canon FF bodies and L lenses. So I know full well about the cumbersome weight AND bulkiness. I sold 90% of it after deciding that Olympus’ MFT was the best system for my new bird and wildlife focus. Now that their band is preparing for their farewell concert in LA, I’m thinking that I should add the 75mm f/1.8 to my bag, because my 40-150 f/2.8 won’t be bright enough. I just bought the 17 f/1.2 and 25 f/1.2 (used) but now you’ve got me sniffing around for the 75.
I just came back to do photography after a 15 years break, i sold my APSC and full frame Nikon and discovered the MFT. I like your videos and your enthusiasm. Keep going!
Extra tip: wear ear-plugs. Not just for your hearing sake, but open areas near the stage are usually near the speakers because people without ear plugs cant get comfortably close. But if you have ear-plugs, you can be right next to the speaker with no discomfort, and get some great shots.
Good call! Protect your own health and get better shots. Win win!
I cherish this lens for my black and white photos as well as for street.
Even though gear does not matter, this lens makes any photographer better. My favorite Olympus lens.
I did have people gushing over my Olympus 75mm photos unlike any other lens I used. The contrast between the butter smooth out-of-focus backgrounds and ultra sharp focus on the subject, really give the images a 3D look.
Didn't stop me from going full frame, but did stop me from offloading all my M43 gear. 75mm is one of 4 lenses I kept and still use on my GX85.
The 75mm and 12mm are on my lens bucket list. So of course I bought the 8-18 when my local camera store had a sale. But I WILL get this lens at some point. Great overview of why this has a such a cool lens. I keep an old Nikon 135mm f/2.8 for similar reasons.
The 75mm will SHOCK a you. I remember looking at the images after the using the Olympus 75mm for the very first time.I looked at all my pro full frame portrait lenses and said NO MORE. IT’S ONE OF these “ aha” moments that we get photography that literally changes EVERYTHING.
Couldn't agree with you more Robin.. Even the great M43 detractor Tony Northrup said he used a 75 1.8 over a Full frame in the mid 2010s. I remember saving to buy a Nikon Mount 135mm 1.8 in the 70s ..it was 4 times larger than this lens. I have regretted not buying the Olympus instead of buying things like gimballs and external recorders that I almost never use. Originally, I was trying to get the insanely expensive 42.5mm 1.2 Pana Leica, but just couldn't justify the cost. Then I got caught up in the bokeh hoopla and got the Sigma 56mm 1.4 for the bigger aperture. The Sigma has never let me down for sharpness,, but nothing matches the Olympus colors. A true perfect lens.
I have been considering getting that Sigma 56/1.4 to complement my 75/1.8. Does it just not have quite the same "pop" and magic as the 75?
@@seth094978 Hi Seth.. that would be really hard for me to judge since I only had a bit of contact with the 75 mm. No side by side comparisons. I will say that the color on the 56 Sigma is fantastic and I've never been let down by the sharpness that I can tell. Also if you are in say a standard house sized room trying to do portraits the 75 might be too long.. but if you do things like Robin does where he shoots stage presentations the extra telephoto could be an advantage. Keep in mind it's 150 mm equivalent in full frame.
Agree 100%. MFT is the maximum size for a versatile system that can go anywhere, anytime, in all conditions.
Now, Robin, someday, please show us what you do in post to overcome the shortcomings of MFT.
Your burst of explosive energy and enthusiasm in your videos never seizes to amuse me :D I'm all for small, light and compact myself, so I stick to the m4/3 system. I had a big bulky FF camera once and was sitting on a shelf collecting dust, so I sold it. Also, what you say about moment vs iso, iq etc is SO TURE! I have university photos of VGA resolution taken from nokia phones of the 2000-2005 era that still bring a smile on my face when i look at them, because I see past the horrible resolution and re-leave the moments. Unfortunately all this pixel-peeping frenziness you get from everywhere these days has us forget what matters most in a photograph, which is, as you very correctly put it, the moment!
Great vids btw, keep it up!
YES, agreed! One of the best lenses EVER made! Right on!
There is a lot more to full frame telephotos than the 70-200. 135 prime lenses come to mind. Having said that, I do own the Olympus 75 1.8 and it’s a killer lens, and especially well-suited for live event stage work.
One reason I'm sitting on my gear and haven't jumped to Nikon (until Canon releases the RF line from its lock and key that isn't even an option for me) or Sony is the lens I used the most when out and about, the PanaLeica 12-60, would cost 1000 plus just to replace the lens not even counting the cost of the body to get a 24-120mm. The Nikon S 24-120 is a great lens, but the price and size of the overall kit doesn't really make me want to swap. The a7c almost did tbh, but again 1800 bucks for a body that takes a lot of the parts you would notice immediately from 800-dollar bodies is kind of steep (and the 24-105 is even more expensive than the Nikon, similar used give or take).
It doesn't help I was able to snag a collection of PanaLeica lenses from a friend jumping ship (to APS-C lol, he wanted to keep some crop factor while getting the Sony E mount to work with his a7iiis for work, so he got an A6600 and uses it for work and hobby) all in great shape for less than the price of what the Leica 42.5 1.2 goes for on the low end. I like my lenses, I like my GX85 and GX8, I like my results, I'm content.
I love mine. Focuses fast too. Great for kids sports and a lot easier to handle than a big 300mm or longer. Just think the reach of this lens is 150mm which is almost what my wife gets on her FF with a big heavy 200mm which only does 2.8.
Thank you for inspiring us. I learned a new perspective to taking photos. It's about the moment, not the lowest iso used.
I sold my 75mm and felt regret. I will buy it back soon.
The 35-100 f2.8 was my favorite one on m43 but this 75mm was the lens which gave me the most beautiful picts for sure but quite hard to use because of the range.
Other than not being fully weather sealed and a relatively long min focus distance, it’s a remarkable lens. It works well for low light wildlife work from hides and long astrophotography sessions as well.
This is the best Olympus lens and the only lens that comes close to it is the sigma 60 mm 2.8. Not a 1.8 lens, but a very affordable and very sharp lens as an alternative to the 75mm. There is also a newer Sigma portrait lens with 1.4 and that is a real consideration for MFT cameras .
Lovely review Robin and and an excellent video
I agree that with both lenses at f2.8 the Sigma might even be sharper, but when I got this lens I found I wasn't using the Sigma that much anymore.
@@qfapodcastabouthowardstern
I can understand that . The 60 or 55 sigma are portrait lenses with little advantage for any other use . When I want a portrait lens that does what you classically would do with a lens between 80-135 in 35mm terms delivers , then those sigmas shine ; just as the 75 1.8 .
Of course, you can use 35-60 for portraits as well, but you have to watch the distortion at the wide end and the limitation to blur backgrounds at the other . That said , I know many who prefer 35 or 55 for that sort of work where space is restricted to use a lens more traditionally associated with portraiture .
Why i choose MFT system.. cuz i love this system.. more light and more tiny lens.. love it much 😍😍
Dang it Robin! You are going to get everyone buying these on Ebay, and I was trying to get a good deal.😆 Such a good and enthusiastic review though👌. Thank You👍
Holy crap Robin, those shots of the band look fantastic!
I get more keepers with this lens than any other of my 4/3 lenses. Has a little magic to it.
Hey Robin,
It's a great lens though it has one issue. AF can struggle in bad light quite a bit. I really wish Olympus releases a PRO update. Something like 75mm 1.4 PRO.
Cheers
After 3 years of panasonic G9, I bought a sony a7c with kit zoom and pancake lenses, for shorter focal lengths the size and bulk add is negligible. I recently had a lot of fun shooting a concert with a Canon FD 135mm f2.8 lens which is tiny. Ironically my main argument for the sony was the autofocus, and i chose to shoot with a manual lens that night ;) this 75mm 1.8 sounds quite interesting!
Your Olympus photos are great. Modern cameras have great dynamic range these days whether it is crop or 4/3's. Great little lens too
I just got me the 42.5 1.2 (equiv 85 2.4). I really consider the 75 1.8 (equiv 150 3.6), great pictures!
Equivalent only in Depth of Field!!!!
Maybe I'll get this at some point. For now I'm in love with my 40-150 2.8 - its versatility is unparalleled.
The 75 is a increadabile sharp lens. I am using it much more than the 40-150 2.8 which is an excellent lens as well.
Robin! I just got one of these, this lens should almost be illegal 😂😂 holy moly it's sharp
Give me the 15, 42.5, and 75 and it doesn’t matter what FF does, these three deliver beautiful images every time at a price and weight unmatched.
Hi from Italy.
I have a friend that was injuried from a full frame sensor camera.
He was hit by his girlfriend, in the head, with a 400mm metal telephoto lens. Now he also struggles to speak. The world of micro four thirds would have saved his life. Thank you
😂
😂
I would love to own the Olympus 75mm F1.4 lens but I got a great buy on a Panasonic 56mm F1.4.
This Sigma lens is light, smaller than the Olympus 75mm lens, has great clarity and bokeh.
The 75mm of course has better reach for your live stage performances.
Robin I love your enthusiasm and excitement, it so great man!
🤩 you video is wonderful
👆 the DOF with MFT or perhaps just with 75mm f/1.8 is not the same for example as the Sony 135 f/1.8 GM - I do prefer the SONY 135mm GM look. ...with that said i still do like the MFT DOF.
I have made the jump to full frame from MFT but i still own my GH5 (MFT) & a couple of awesome lenses.
A few reasons I jumped in MFT System are:
1⃣ better price point
2⃣ size, the smaller camera & lenses
3⃣ video quality, outstanding
I would like the the 135 f/1.8 GM from Sony. A few things are making me pause:
1⃣weight (it is bit heavy but not super heavy).
2⃣size - if it is too big a lens i might not use as much as i would if smaller.
3⃣ price - an expensive lens
MFT system a couples of somethings I do not like:
1⃣ not the best in low light (I do not want to add glass as with speed booster)
2⃣ MF is not get especially if filming solo - this was big point for myself, if behind the camera no problem though.
👆 Robin, you concert photos are crazy fantastic, love them. Were those images right from camera or did you touch up in LightRoom?
Not totally sure what I will do in terms of MFT or Full Frame lens with 75 or 135 but for sure I am more informed thanks to you Robin!
Dear Robin, If you really want to forget about full frame, try the Nokton 60mm 0.95. Amazing.
No AF, no go.
@@robinwong The focusing precision of this lens makes taking portraits really pleasant, sharpness every time! I've had the 75mm 1.8 and the Nokton 42.5 before. I won't go back for the portraits. It is a photo lens that has gone unnoticed on TH-cam. I don't know why.
My FF bag rarely gets taken out on hikes or rides these days, where my MFT bag is alway there.
Ordered this lens yesterday along with the hood and it will be arriving at my doorstep by this weekend. Can't wait to use it and compare it to my Sony 135mm 2.8 STF lens.
You are an inspiration Robin. Thank you and keep it up
35mm conversion 150mm aperture F3.6
They're really beautiful lenses The minimum focal length is short, and I'm very satisfied with it(In Korea, where I am, Olympus has withdrawn its business, so we cannot buy new products😢)
Great pictures! Thanks for sharing!
Kind of agreed with you Robin. I have been bringing a modern full frame with zoom lens on my Europe trip. Overall its still bulky and heavy for me. I'm a bokeh boy, so most street photograph was in 75mm. After watched your videos, I resurrected my 10yrs old EP1, bought a 2nd hand 45mmf1.8. Took a KL street photography trip again, and it's feel fantastic & lightweight! Street people won't scare/aware at all, when I pointing toward them. ( they might thought I'm shooting building since 90mm.equ was far away from ). Thank you Robin! Hope you keep your passion on m43 like I do. Cheers.
The old Olympus 85mm f/2 and 100mm f/2 lenses were drop dead gorgeous but this 75mm f/1.8 is off the scale. One weird thing is that the old 85mm f/2 is even smaller, has only a 49mm filter thread and fits in the old Olympus standard camera cases! This shows how ahead of their time the Olympus designers were in the 1970s.
Have both and hands down 100mm f2 is my favourite lens, 👌🏻
I definitely need this but at a bargain used price 😂
The 45mm is a great little lens and it makes sense to have this with it
Just took M.Zuiko 75mm F1.8 to studio photoshoot. I pitted it against Lumix Leica Summilux 25mm F1.4 II and M.Zuiko 45mm F1.8.
I used combination of studio lights with two of my Olympus flashes over RC, so there was plenty of light and I could shoot at F2,8 at each lens - when they are the sharpest.
75mm F1.8 definitely took the best shot of the evening :) It was little bit impractical to use it inside for studio work on a tripod.
45mm F1.8 was a great all rounder in this type of work.
25mm F1.4 Was a bit of a disappointment at start, but at the end of photoshoot i realized that it works best when i remove the camera from the tripod.
Been telling myself to sell it because its not used often, but then I take to a studio and the results are always breathtaking.
This lens has been on my wish list for a few years now. I'm coming into a little bit of extra money in a month or two and I'll be taking the plunge then. It helps that there is an excellent camera shop here in Tokyo with an excellent selection of used gear - Fujiya Camera. I can get this beast for about 54,000 yen which is $400 with extremely minor scratches on the metal casing, but the optics are still perfect.
Do it. I waited for ages. Something made me flip the switch last week: LOWER PRICES!🤣😂😅 It's about the only thing that's cheaper to buy new right now than a couple of years ago. Or secondhand is fine, especially if you can try it out in a shop first.
I've noticed lower prices on some of the nicer lenses and also there seem to be some dealers offloading new old stock. The first version 12-40mm f/2.8 is one example but the 75mm f/1.8 has also come down. I wonder if old OLYMPUS branded lenses are being offloaded to make way for the OM SYSTEM branded lenses like the new 12-40mm f/2.8. Personally I would prefer the Olympus name on it anyway. I just grabbed both lenses and now I'm poor! Really but they are a big step up for me in my photography, which I love. I'm skimping in other areas.
Black or chrome? Not that it matters. I got chrome as Robin said he can distinguish it easily in his camera bag in low light. Plus it's badass. Both are.
@@davebellamy4867 In January, I got the 12-40 f/2.8 with a single cosmetic scratch on the metal exterior, but optically, it's perfect. Honestly, I was tempted to get the 75 instead, since they were nearly the same price. I got the zoom and it's my first Zuiko pro and I'm more than happy with it, but I wish I had enough to get both at the time.
@@davebellamy4867 I don't really care about the color, the camera shop I go to here in Tokyo will usually have used chrome/silver more often than the black. I'll take whichever one is in the best condiction.
Great job Robin! I’m with You .
With you… stunning lens.. my favourite!
Nicely done Robin!
You make me want to buy one now.
It's a banger. My stage kit is the Olympus 75/1.8 and a PanaLeica Nocticron 42.5/1.2 even though I have MF, FF, and APS-C gear too.
Your enthusiasm is so wonderful!! Thank you for all the great videos for us M4/3 shooters :)
Lots of good advice (close, move, emotions, etc.).
I once took the Pen F in my jacket pocket, the 75/1.8 in my pant-pocket, and binoculars around my neck -- to a high celebrity concert where photo was banned. The guards were distracted by the binoculars, and didn't check further, so I managed to get the Pen F and the 75/1.8 into the concert hall. Unfortunately, with a distance of some 100 m to the stage, the photos were poor.
This summer, I went to a jazz concert. The artist welcomed photos, but the arranger banned photos. The guards didn't check my back pack, and I could bring in my camera + 40-150/2.8. The distance was ca. 50 m, with no possibility to move. Somewhat static pictures, and I wish I had had the TC14 with me. I used spot exposure, with ISO in the range of 200-2000.
My examples are meant to illustrate the importance of getting close to the stage. With the distance I had, I couldn't get close-ups, and couldn't change the angle. So OK pictures the 40-150/2.8, but not great.
--
A final comment on WB. A couple of weeks ago, I attended a restaurant with live music, and used the 20/1.4 -- ok, because I could get close. The problem was very red color in the lights, which (i) reduced contrast and made it difficult to focus, and (ii) quite difficult to fix colors in post.
Question: do you fix colors in post processing, or try to set the WB before taking pictures?
I bought this lens with the originalOMD-EM5
I am surprised at the quality of the lens without stopping down2 to3 stops the out of focus with'bokeh' effects rival the 'doughnuts' of the mirror lenses , which tend to be heavier and donot have auto focussing,& have to be shot on aperture priority. This lens is the ideal portrait lens with 'ambient lighting' and will give pleasing results.
I like it very much!
A very timely and helpful video. I am going to a concert tomorrow night and hope to be able to take my camera. This will be the lens.
thanks for the tips on shooting concerts Robin.
Agree with you. Weight/size are reasons I love MFT so much. This afternoon played with my Nikon full frame dslr and 24-70 2.8. Can’t believe how I used to using them whole day without hurting myself!
Just looking at one now.
i used 135 f2.8 m42 on apsc, it was great, small, did the job
Hi Robin, I do have this lens. Great as you said. Olympus is for about one year my backup system only. Because I moved to Canon fullframe. Why not Sony? I first had a used Sony A7 III. The choice of lenses is great. But the handling of Sony ( for example menu) was bad. Canon is simpler in my opinion. So I took the RP.
Sympathic in use.
You are a much more experienced photographer than I. Canon or Sony are leading in fullframe. So it is a question of money too. I decided only to buy used equipment. One way to go...