Gibson vs. Martin vs. Taylor - Expensive Acoustic Guitar Shootout!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 มี.ค. 2023
- Today we take a look at three of the best acoustic guitars I have EVER played! A Gibson Hummingbird Custom Koa, a Martin D41, and a Taylor 814ce! Which one is your favorite?!?
Check one of these beauties out for yourself at Front Street Music!
2735 Front Street Cuyahoga Falls, OH 44221
Personal Instagram:
/ christian_j_baker
Website:
frontstmusic.com/
Facebook:
frontstreetm...
Front Street Instagram:
/ frontst.music - เพลง
Video corrections!
It is a D41 not a D42, they are very similar but have different inlay work around the guitar.
And I failed to mention that scale length also affects the playability of a guitar.
Furthermore the D41 has more Sustain than the D42 wihile the D42 is more percussive.
Also: Fingerboards are not necks, they are part of the neck. None of those have an Ebony neck. You got the Gibson right having a Mahogany neck, and it too has an Ebony fingerboard.
The martin then Gibson and Taylor. I wouldn't kick either one out of bed for eating crackers.
Question:
You are the only one who can inform us about the playability...
Please what's your opinion?
Greetz from 🇳🇱
@@fp3359 all were set up perfectly and play beautifully! As I said in the video, the Koa from the Gibson is very stiff and you can feel that against your body, it really makes a difference in how it feels. The necks on both the Martin and Gibson were very similar. Very traditional, chunky and round without being a tree trunk. The Taylor was an odd beast, didn’t resonate all that much but the neck was SO COMFORTABLE! Much smaller than the other two, almost played like and electric guitar neck.
To me, the Gibson sounds like a perfect blend between the Taylor and the Martin. It has the shimmering crystal clear, highs, and the warm, rounded bass with a mid range, and the same or similar, punchiness to the Taylor’s percussion.
LOVE this description!
Perfectly said!
Exactly. The Guild D55 would be a better comparison to the Gibson shown here.
the short scale! It records perfectly.
Playing the Gibby in person will change your view. Trust me. Boomy and jug like. Was very disappointed. I really wanted a humming bird after all these years. Big nope. Eventually, I went Martin D-28 HD MD. Try it. Enough bling, more guitar for the money. Although the D-42 has big eyes!
They all have their own qualities and none is better than the other. It comes down to what tone(s) one likes and how it feels for them to play it.
Also the use of the guitar! I said I loved that Martin, but a Taylor is what I settled on for a full band setting
@Ralph Reilly For clarity, I meant the brands (Martin, Taylor, Gibson) all make great guitars, so it's subjective once one is getting into the better levels of their products. That said, those are amazing brands (especially their custom shops), and there are also amazing boutique custom shops like Bourgeois, Collings, Olson, Greenfield, Santa Cruz, etc
Thank you!
That was a real treat. Thanks for taking the time to share this with us. Obviously, all three guitars sounded great and I would love to have any of them. But, I believe that the Gibson Hummingbird sounded the best and if I was able to buy one based on this comparison test, I would buy the Gibson.
One of the best demos I've ever heard/seen!! I love your playing just the basic chords and then the fingerpicking, which brought out the best in each guitar. The way you held the last note on each to let it ring out showed the sustain capabilities, and I really liked that. I don't own any guitars in this lofty price range, but I have a Martin SP000C-16E which plays great but doesn't have the deep sound of this larger D-45. The Gibson really sounded fabulous to me, but the others were also very nice. I once played an 814CE at a trade show and would have bought it on the spot if I could have afforded it.
Nice review. Martin all the way. I've owned Taylor, Bourgeois, Santa Cruz, Gibson, Collings and a boatload of Martins over the decades, yes I've been fortunate. In retirement all are gone except the Martins. Arthritis and age moved me, and many of my playing friends, to smaller bodies, love dreads but they're gone and I fell in love with OM's. Retired with a first year OM-18 Authentic (Adirondack over Mahogany), a Custom Shop OM-28 (Alpine over Madagascar), a stunning and rare OM-45 (Curly Engelmann over Tasmanian Blackwood), and a Custom Shop 00-42 (Adirondack over Madagascar). Play what makes your ears smile.....................
Have you ever tried Furch/Stonebridge?
@@varkony60 I have not, pretty much out of the loop since I retired in 2015, but I've heard good things.
You are truly blessed, guitar wise. I started playing about the same time you did. I also contend with old arthur. I'm down to a 2010 D-18GE and a custom CEO-7 Rosewood. The D-18GE is the best guitar I have ever played. Compared it against Santa Cruz and Collings when I bought it, Blew everything he had that I tried (and it was a lot) into the weeds, My real forever guitar.
@@LK-oi6bq Hi, the dread I kept until last, when arthritis moved me to smaller bodies, was a first year D-18GE, I loved that guitar. Was afraid of the 1-3/4" nut at first, now all my remaining gits are the wider nut, actually better for my arthritis. The early GE's were the Authentics of their day, wood selection gets worse every year IMO, you have a lifetime keeper, enjoy !!
@@LK-oi6bq Hi, the dread I kept until last, when arthritis moved me to smaller bodies, was a first year D-18GE, I loved that guitar. Was afraid of the 1-3/4" nut at first, now all my remaining gits are the wider nut, actually better for my arthritis. The early GE's were the Authentics of their day, wood selection gets worse every year IMO, you have a lifetime keeper, enjoy !!
Martin, Gibson, Taylor ... IMO : )
I feel the same.
1 Martin
2 Gibson
3 Taylor
One of the best guitar comparisons I've seen! I own a Taylor 314CE and love how easy it is to play. That said, my order of the three showcased guitars would be Martin, Gibson and then Taylor. All three sound and look great but I really like the fullness of the Martin.
So hard to choose because these three guitars are just amazing. I personally prefer the Martin and the Gibson since they are more balanced, but would take
the Taylor any day as well. I presently have a Martin D28 and fall in love with its sound everytime I pick it up lol
I play both a Taylor 814 and a Martin D18. They are both over 20 yrs old. When I bought both guitars, I had to play through several to get the sound that I was looking for. I have found that even the same model of guitars are going to sound and feel just a little different. I have found that the Taylors are more consistant in their sound from one guitar to the next. Martins. I have found, seem to have a wider variety of sound quality from one guitar to the next. So, I had to play through several more Martins than Taylors to get the sound and the feel that I was looking for. And, both have improved with age. So, if you are thinking about buying a guitar, take your time and play several even of the same model. I have also played several Gibsons, and I find that I actually like these best when I am singing. They just seem to be a bit more rounded or mellow or less punchy than either the Taylor or the Martin. So, the guitar that you end up purchasing should be the one that best compliments your own voice or style of playing. The right guitar for you just depends upon what you want to do with it.
They all sound great. But the Martin sounds so incredibly warm and rich. Martin for me all the way! Thanks for sharing!!
I agree. The bass is so good on the Martin.
@@AJXOXO-vz1pn so rich.
Very nice demo,and beautiful guitars, I like them all and noticed the difference with the smaller bodied Taylor in loudness, obviously! But the Martin and Gibson stood out, with great low end and projection, but the Taylor's chimmy rosewood sound is beautiful. Thanks for really nice tunes.
Nice video! And three stunning guitars, that hummingbird is out of this world beautiful, both visually and aurally. I'm curious which one felt easiest to play.
My dad used to own Lefty Frizzel’s D29 Martin. He bought it off Lefty one night for $200 while Lefty was a little inebriated. My dad had it for about 40 years. He sold it to a friend.
I’d give anything to have that guitar! I did learn to play on it though. It was amazing!
One reason so many people are liking the Gibson and Martin more than the Taylor is because you have the Taylor'sm sound hole facing away from the microphone and have the mic located up the neck a ways. When you are playing the other two their sound holes are faced directly at the camera and the mic is in line with the body, not the neck.
I went back and checked. You are absolutely correct. That said, Taylors are generally known for their brightness, which works better in a group or recording mix. The Martin is great for solo work and imo, the Gibson is somewhere in between. -Just my two cents worth.
@@rosewoodsteel6656 right, I think it’s just one reason people in comments are overwhelmingly preferring the Gibson and Martin. Also listening through a cellphone highlights the lower bass that Taylors tend to have, and through a cellphone speaker that’s probably magnified
@@rosewoodsteel6656. I agree. To my ears, quickly, the Martin sounds warmest, the Taylor sounds brighter (thin?), and the Gibson is somewhere in-between. The Taylor would play well with either of the other two - perhaps best with the Martin, as they are most different/can balance each other best.
I’m Australian, and that’s how I think about our most popular acoustic brands - Maton is warm and full, like the Martin; Cole Clark are brighter (thinner?), more like the Taylor here. Paired up in a duet, they compliment each other very well. I have always played (and love) Matons (solo).
Hummingbird sounds beautiful.. but I have to go with the Martin
The Martin by far is my favorite with Gibson #2 and Taylor #3. All three are beautiful and useful in different recording situations.
I have a D28 which is the holy grail of acoustic guitars
No way lol Taylor lack low notes, they sound too boxy
Don’t really like the Taylor at all which surprises me… but the Gibson and Martin seem a whole class above it in sound and sustain … I like Taylors no doubt but wow… I could hear quite a difference especially when you picked out Amazing Grace on it. I’d have to hear the other two several times to decide and it’s very hard trying to compare Koa and Rosewood…. Very hard but that is definitely the best sounding Koa that I have every heard. I’d have to weigh the costs of the Gibson and Martin but I think I’m ending up with the Martin unless it’s a whole lot different in cost. Thanks for the shoot out. I have a nice little martin now and have seriously been thinking about stepping up and getting a super nice guitar and now I know two I’ll be trying out. Thanks again.
I purchased a Taylor 814ce a few months ago. Beautiful tone and craftsmanship, but the tone reminded me of a 314ce I used to own. I returned it and ordered a 614ce WHB Builders Edition. Torrified Spruce top, Big Leaf Flamed Maple sides/back. It has amazing projection, a well balanced tone, and warmth from the Maple sides/back that isn't dark compared when to my cedar top.
Fair winds and following seas to all.
I had a similar experience years ago. I wanted a Taylor. I travelled to several shops to try as many as I could. And I tried out pretty much every model in Taylor’s lineup. Of all of them the 314CE sounded best! So that is what I bought. And several Taylor dealers have told me that many of their customers have come to the same conclusion. 😊.
@@rogersonger4454 👍
Great video - I closed my eyes when I listened and, without a question, the Martin sounded the best with the Gibson being a close second.
I own 2 Taylor acoustic guitars and they are the best sounding guitar out there and the easiest to play. I purchased a "Brand New" Gibson Hummingbird and when I got it home I noticed that part of the guitar finish was missing on the front of the instrument and the high E string did not work through the amp! When I brought it back the salesman asked if I had ever played a Taylor and I have been hooked ever since! Martin guitars do sound awesome but most are difficult to play!
Like trying to compare a Lambo and a Ferrari they are totally different but both Super Cars.The best one is the one you like and like to play.
Would have nice to add a Guild D-55 to the mix. Often overlooked vs the big 3 tested in this video. The guild I ended up buying a few years ago beat out Gibsons, Taylor’s and Martins that cost as much as $1500 more. Now I didn’t have a budget for the very top of the line guitars like these but Guild makes some fantastic instruments
Killer demo! Thanks for posting. 👍
It all depends on your intended use. The Martin and Gibson have more bass, for sure. I would say Martin, Gibson, then Taylor for bass and volume. But here is the deal, I am a finger stylist and do not play with a band. And for that, the Taylor is amazing and literally "sings". It's mid range is wonderful, and the feel of the neck and how the guitar melts into your body makes it a dream to play. Personally I wanted to love Martins since they were the dream or ideal, but then I played them.... and then I played Taylors. It wasn't even close for me. My go to is a Taylor. This is not saying the others are bad, because they are not. But I find that for me, the ease of playing, how they feel, etc. I am a Taylor guy. I would not pass up any other guitar that felt right though.... but as I said... there you have it. Cheers.
I am a long time Martin and Gibson owner. Mostly Martins .. 15 of them since 1961. I have not warmed up to Taylor as they are the result of physical and social engineering.
However, over the past few years Martin quality has diminished greatly. I do have two now, 0000-1 (one of 370 made) and a 2015 00-18V with famed mahogany backs and sides.
Both are very good guitars, to a point. The newer Martin is exhibiting a common material failing which annoys me greatly. This would not have happened Pre CFM IV. This adds to
a great disappointment in 2 customs made for me in 2010 and 2011.. and the reason I will never buy another new Martin. Not only a manufacturing blunder but substandard customer service.
I am trimming down to three guitars, I will keep my custom flamenco guitar, and my 2003 Hiway 1 Tele.. that leaves a decision about an acoustic (perhaps acoustic electric).
An exceptional Gibson is difficult to find. Even with the Montana made units, Gibson continues to be consistently inconsistent. In my current hunt a friend/luthier/collector/hustler
with approximately 80 guitars inverted me to go through his stash , they were all remarkable. Archtops, Electrics and the majority acoustic to include Flamenco, Classical and flat tops. My perusal came down to 2 guitars,.. a 1996 Martin Eric Clapton and , surprisingly, a Taylor 712CE ( I think) The Taylor was the slickest playing guitar I have had my hands on in decades. While the tone was subjective ( something Bob Taylor said of his guitars many years ago) it was better I imagined and better than any Taylor I have ever played. The down side, I am not an acoustic electric fan and really don't want to admit I like a Taylor. However, it was a very good guitar. I was impressed.
Then there is the Eric Clapton. In spite of being made in the CFM IV era ( thankfully earlier) this is a remarkable guitar. Near mint and celestial. The design, material and workmanship surpasses anything I have seen from Martin in years.This ;particular guitar is one in a million, well thousands. Any one besides me recall when the Clapton guitar was introduced it was a "limited edition'? Limited by the number they could make. I believe the first year or so were the definition of "limited edition". It is so obvious looking at and playing this guitar ion comparison to what is being built now. I will eat crow in that I vowed to never buy a signature guitar. This guitar would make me get over it.
Dilemma, I'm waffling between the two and find that astonishing. Taylor Vs a Martin. Life could be worse. Good thing, neither guitar is over blinged which I find to be a deterrent to purchase. While the 00-18 V is being Martin material and design flaw corrected by my friend/luthier/hustler I have set a date to pick up the guitar re-examine both. guitars.
Obviously all 3 are amazing guitars but for my money the warm AND very ‘bold’ tone from a Martin make it the best sounding acoustic on the market. I’ve had an HD28 for about 2 years now and I’m still enthralled by its sound. (As an aside, I actually like the understated look of the guitar too. Some of these very expensive guitars with all of the abalone inlay, etc. make them look a little too gaudy and ‘showy’ to me). Great video and great playing. Thanks!
Im with you. I have a old d28 and a early 2000s hd28 and they more than get the job done! I don't care for the bling bindings, the Haring bone on the hd28 is plenty. And they are cannons lol
I had previously thought I liked the tone of Gibson acoustic guitars best. But in this video, I preferred the Martin. It had the exact tone that I always hear in Doc Watson recordings!
In general, I like a more bassy tone from an acoustic guitar, to balance out the brightness of the strings.
I doubt that I'll ever be able to afford any of those top-of-the-line guitars, though. .... But I can always go spend a pleasant couple of hours playing the ones in the music stores! 🙂
Nice shootout! Thanks for the video.
Beautiful playing!!
Very cool comparison. The Martin D41 or the Gibson Hummingbird would be my choices.
I've owned a D-41, a Taylor 914ce and a hummingbird. Still have the hummingbird.
I don know if there is really a best , it depends on what you like how you play and sound your looking for . That’s why guitarists usually have more then one . Thanks for sharing
Got the SJ200, HD35 and a Taylor 818e. In love with em all!
I liked the Taylor out of the 3! You're playing moves me. Thanks for vid!
I suppose it is a matter of personal preference, but I have tried other types and brands of acoustics and found the best for my purposes are Martin’s. I like the feel, the tone, the sound. My two Martin’s tune up very easily and consistently. I am only a self taught finger picker and thumb strummer, not a trained musician, so my opinion has less weight than a pro or an advanced guitarist. I think it is an individual choice based on a lot of factors, and the key is to find a guitar that works best for you and your music.
That Martin sounded like everything you would hope one would sound like and rings just like a bell... Amazing. That Gibson is the better one to sing with though in my opinion. Loud. But wouldn’t over power you. Think vintage James Taylor vibes. All three are super fine.
Wow. Fun comparison. Very good guitar playing. I’m beginning to understand how a fine playing and sounding guitar gets elevated to almost god-like status. The guitar maker adds bling. Gorgeous handcrafted inlays make a highly playable, beautiful sounding guitar into an artpiece. It’s a wonderful way to add value and beauty to essentially an already-beautiful instrument. Thanks for sharing.
All three sound great for sure but for me, the interweb is a tough place to really appreciate the sound of high end acoustic guitars because of the huge differences in mic and speaker setups for the recorder and the listener. Live is the only way to really know IMO with acoustic guitars but it is always nice to hear sweet tones. I got my dream Ambertone D41 this year and it is just the most amazing guitar I've ever held. I haven't spent a lot of time with top end guitars, but have played some very nice Taylors and Takimines along with a few Ovation and my PRS Angelus. This makes them all sound like plywood guitars. I played a D18, D28, HD35 and a John Mayer OM locally while searching for the Martin of my dreams but the D41 is just a different level of instrument IMO. I don't play out now without getting compliments on how beautiful it looks and sounds.
Nice job on presenting these three great guitars. I own a Taylor 514 ce and was taken by the sound quality when I bought it. That was nearly a decade ago and I have come to appreciate the high levels of craftsmanship that go into high end guitars. I am now old enough that I would like to add the Gibson and Martin guitars to my collection.
The 14 series from Taylor is the go to for my live playing. Have had the pleasure to use anything from a 214 all the way through an 814! Loved every one of them that I’ve played!
I have the 2005 514ce . Nothing compares to the sound of that Taylor .❤
Taylor has a subtle sound compared to other two. The other two sounds vibrant. The Martin guitar will always be the holy grail.
For years I played different acoustics at the guitar store. Picked up this Taylor brand and was shocked on how easy the neck was to play. Bought it.
Gibson, Taylor, Martin. I like the brighter and deeper tones together. Great comparison. Thanks!
Of all the people in this video you, Christian, are my favorite! As far as the guitars? For me, hands down, the Martin. Great presentation and playing.
😂 thank you!
Martin!! I have one and I LOVE it LOL!! Great Video Brother!! 👍👍
The Martin and Gibson were my definite favorites, but would go with the Gibson. As you said, it has not even begun to open up yet!
Gibson has the most balanced sound of them all. The Martin has that typical martin sound lacking mids. While the Taylor is bright with no bottom and weak mids.
My thoughts exactly.
And mine too!
Try a martin d 18. It's not lacking mids
Taylors benefit greatly from a mahogany top, back, and sides.
814 is probably the cheapest Taylor that sounds decent. I think most of them sound too modern and thin. I own a CEO7 and a Songwriter Deluxe. I’d consider buying an L-00 or J45 as well as almost any Martin. D18 OM28 HD28 or even a Guild D50. Taylor wouldn’t make the list.
I loved hearing them all. What a treat! My final vote goes with Martin. It took my breath away when you started to play. Big WOW! Itreasured your enthusiasm for that instrument.
The Gibson a close second, and I like the cutaway.
The Taylor was sweet, but thinner sound, and that's saying a lot because it still sounded so good.
You didn't mention the electronics in the Martin or Gibson, if any. Thanks agsin.
Martin and Gibson had no stock pickup.
Just ran across this and I have to say, all of those guitars were exceptional. I have to pick the Martin since I own one just like it (that I spec'ed out and got from the custom shop). I have Taylor acoustics and they are well made and sound/play great. I don't have Gibson acoustics, but my electric choice is my Les Paul so they already won that round with me.
Wow , Beautiful guitars.
Hard to pick a favorite as they all sound amazing in their own unique way. I also am a Taylor fan and think the 814 sounds as good or better than many high end manufactured or boutique guitars, but with that said, I too would love to own that Martin.
The Gibson is probably the prettiest work of art with all that beautiful inlay on the fretboard. I love the sound of the 814 probably the most but I don’t love the fretboard inlay on the 814’s. I already own two Taylor’s so I think my pick would be the Martin because I don’t own a rosewood guitar and already have a Taylor Koa and Taylor Mahogany.
I sold my Martin HD-28 and bought a Taylor Builders Edition 816ce ... never looked back. Taylor has the playability (that neck is outstanding) and the tonality I needed.
I went to the guitar store with no limit, cool salesman, told me to slose my eyes as he handed me guitars. worst to best (for me): gibson, martin, yamaha ac5r and taylor 814ce. i spent the 3 g's on the taylor, never looked back.
Good call!
@@moreygloss9248
@@moreygloss9248
Glad to hear that. I have an early '90s 810 Dreadnaught and half the venues I don't even need to plug in though it has the Fishman under saddle pu. Just bought a Gibson Les Paul Studio Wine Red, awesome guitar.🎸 Also picked up a Taylor GS Mini Mahoghany as I travel and wanted a smaller axe for that. Also have a 710 that I got about 10 years ago.
Looking to get another Taylor and it's a toss-up between a '23 Taylor 814ce Acoustic-Electric Guitar - Natural with V-Class Bracing and Radiused Armrest or a '23 Taylor 816ce Builder's Edition Acoustic-electric Guitar - Natural. BE is supposed to be better quality and tuners, etc?? but no armrest. 814 though, I really like the idea of the radiused armrest. Not a BE still beautiful guitar. Prob go somewhere and play them just to hear differences and the extra sound port on 816.
How do you like your 814?🎻
@@twobrotherskayaking4736 A guitar, a trusted friend, deserves probably better player than me, but patient ally and sound supporter. A good old dog that'll never die. I'll never regret buying this guitar if I live to be 100 ( Iwon't :-))
Your enthusiasm is great and you obviously respect those three superb guitars/manufacturers. I didn't have a favourite, I own a 000-28 and a D-28 but satisfaction, like beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I love my Martins but in your review I thought ALL the guitars sounded sublime.
Also, I've found over the years Elixir Nanowebs give ME the best sound, the one that 'speaks' to me. I have no interest in saying to anybody that they 'must', or 'should' try them.
Many of us are in the position where we have a 'free' choice between absolutely superb offerings from great manufacturers. Long may it continue.
Thanks for the review, I enjoyed it.
Thank you so much! And the Elixer’s are my personal string of choice!
Put Elixers on a Taylor.
Martins deserve better.
Three beautiful guitars with distinctive sounds. One if each pls.😊
The Gibson sounds like a Gibson, the Martin like a Martin, and the Taylor like a Taylor. The Gibson seems nice, and somewhat balanced. The Taylor is also balanced favoring a brighter sound that can easily cut through a mix and not get in the way of a vocalist. With good speakers, I can feel the Martin "punch". The notes are present, loud, and punchy. I would choose the Martin, then the Gibso, then lastly the Taylor. Thank you for posting this.
I like all three. The Taylor is brighter with less overtones but will shine when plugged in. The Martin has an opened up big sound with beautiful overtones and a nice balanced, full tone. The Gibson has a nice ring and will improve as it opens up. Very beautiful Guitar.
Nice playing!
There's not a bad one in the bunch. I have a Taylor 410ce that i've played for many years and it plays like a dream still. Actually it seems to sound better with age. Comparing the three guitars chosen for the video really comes down to brand loyalty. Great video!
Get your hearing checked.
That Martin was the best, coming from a Gibson LG-2 owner.
That Hummingbird is absolutely gorgeous. OMG.! The Taylor just rings like a bell, and the Martin has a great balanced sound. If I had to pick, I think I would take the Gibson, if nothing else just to look at!
All is gorgeous and perfect sound!!! Try and the larivve!! We want video!! Thank you!
I must admit the Gibson sounded way better than expected against the Martin D42. The Taylor was last for strum tone, but outstanding for fingerstlye. Think Its a tie between the M and the G to my ears and eyes.
Exquisite! The finest materials and craftsmanship! Superb tonality, etc... The only reasonable or rational decision is to buy all three cause I'd never be able to winnow them down to one. The perfect demo song selection was very appropo! I listened over and over and over...
Incredible sustain for all three; wow!
I've got a Taylor 714 CE, and it plays and sounds like a dream.
The Gibson is such an amazing guitar, no wonder more Artists endorse them more than any other brand. I own a song writer myself, and wouldn’t trade it for anything.
Saaame! Love the songwriter. Traded a les paul studio for it, best trade I've ever made.
Particularly when they're paid
In my order it was Gibson, Martin and last Taylor. I’d like to have heard more back to back comparison though.
They are all Beautiful Guitars.
3 great guitars!
I have had a Taylor DN8, which is way above my abilities, but at the price I was able to get it for... it is essentially an 800 series without the "baubles" which I think makes it prettier. Not even a pick guard.
One thing you might consider including in a vid like this is the list price for each.
I love Martins and would always go for the D-41. Not sure what impact koa back and sides has on the Hummingbird, the standard model has mahogany. Taylors have their own unique sound, less bass but clearly defined. Overall it's just not a fair comparison as each guitar is fundamentally different.
Just happened to be the three nice guitars that walked into our shop. I hope to do a similar video sometime in the future with guitars that have much more similar specs!
3 different guitars, 3 beautiful guitars!
I want one of each!
thank you for a very good comparison...
I'll stick with my D-18. It just turned 50. I bought it new for $325. It has served me well since 1973. I hope my son doesn't put it on Ebay when I play my last song.
D18’s are incredible! Would LOVE to hear that beautifully aged guitar and hear any stories you have with it!
My mother bought a Guild D40C in 77 and gifted it to me last year. I would NEVER give it up. Iv played it and my mother has played it at church with other High end Taylor's and Martin's and it outshines both in almost all categories. It is a monster of a guitar.
$325 was some serious bucks in those days. I've got a D35 but it's only 12 years old.
Nothing can match the Martin sound, but if I were to shell out $$$ these days, I'd go with a J45.
Really nice reviews. When I was looking for a professional level guitar I had a hard time deciding between a Martin and a Taylor. After playing both a choose a Taylor 814ce. Living only 2 miles from the Taylor factory and doing the factory tour influenced me for sure. I got an 814CE-N as well but haven't been impressed with it. My other "professional" guitar is an Ovation Custom Legend (Al DiMeola model) and it sounds great. Getting a guitar is such a personal thing so I think you should just get the guitar that sounds good to you and makes you love playing it.
Love your passion. If I could afford it, I would buy them all 3 for you.
I have a Taylor 914. As I listened to the three choices I felt the Martin was the most deep and mellow. I felt the Taylor was the most crisp and sharp. I felt the Gibson was in between the two. All three were great, but I prefer the crispness of the Taylor! Thanks for the comparison!
the martin is by far the best sounding.
When you talk specs it's worth mentioning scale length. I moved from Taylor's to Gibsons. Just bought a Martin HD28E and if it weren't for the longer scale length it would be my favorite.
Thank you for calling me out on this! Completely escaped my mind while filming! They all play VERY different because of the scale length!
Hard to compare when the Gibson is koa vs The rosewood. Different woods have very different characteristics as you know. I have 2 martins. hd 28 and the 00028 EC. That said I’d gladly add any of those to my collection ....
@danmule2250 I agree, I've had a couple beautiful Koa guitars in the past but they never seemed to come into their own and ended up trading for more traditional woods which to me anyway sounded better.
@@danmule2250 I love the EC model! Easily the best 000 I’ve ever played!
@@mikedaniels4638 As much as I like the sound of koa guitars, the way the resonate and feel just isn’t familiar to me, so I also go with more “normal” wood choices.
I have a mid 90s Gibson Hummingbird, a 73 Martin D 35 and an early 2000s Taylor 314ce, they are all great, the Taylor is very user friendly, plays effortlessly, nice tone throughout the range. The Martin has been played a lot, great sound but could play better and could if I invested a few bucks on its setup. I bought the Humingbird when I went to by an HD 28 Martin but I picked that Hummingbird up and couldn't put it down. It has the best tone throughout the range of any guitar I have played the neck isn't slim but has great action still, it is my favorite, though I love them all. Great review, they are all very different but well constructed guitars.
Yes, they all make great guitars, but i once played a Cole Clark and was truly mesmerized by the warmth and resonance.
I once bought a porn magazine way warmer and more resonant than Playboy or Penthouse. Never even heard of the mag before and no one else had. But, damn, was that some fine pornography!
Damn! That Gibson actually sounded really good!!!
The dreadnought Taylor in the 800 series may have been a better comparison. The Grand Auditorium Taylor fills a duel purpose role in acoustic guitar world. Not really a flat picking guitar but it'll do in a pinch. IMO. All beautiful guitars.
Amazing Grace sounds so good on guitar!
Never owned a gibson acoustic, the closest I have is an epiphone ej200. I absolutely love that guitar. Ive played Martin's before I wasn't a huge fan of their playability. Two years ago i got a Taylor and absolutely love it, I like the brightness of it and the feel. But I did like the warmth of that jumbo Epiphone. Yes it really all depends on personal preference and what you're trying to go for, they're all good sounding guitars. It's almost like purchasing a new car you got to take it for a test drive to see if you like it.
In my opinion the D42 Martin sounds the best.
Looks like D41.
Your right no abalone down from the neck and sound hole. I use to own one I just took his word on it.
I love the Martin D42 and would choose it over either the Taylor or the Gibson.
Direto ao ponto! se eu pudesse teria os três! mas o meu preferido é o Martin! sendo o Gbson o mais bonito! agora me diga, qual dos três é mais gostoso de tocar? parabéns pelo vídeo! saúde! e som na caixa!
Lovely playing, and I love all three. To my ears, with my cheapo ear buds, the Gibson and the Martin sound pretty similar. The Koa has a slight edge over the Indian Rosewood.
I am spoiled however, because I grew up listening to a Brazilian Rosewood Martin, and it now resides with me. My opinion of the sound of the three is skewed by listening to my dream guitar my whole life, and now having it.
The other thing that sways me toward the Gibson, besides the Koa, which has a tremendous sound, is probably my own dislike of brand new Martins. I love the lived in ones, but to me the brand new ones lack something.
Again, I am spoiled, and my opinion is intended with a grain of salt.
Koa is really unique - only in Hawai'i
Hi Christian, I think the better way to compare all these guitars is a same body, because with the diferents body the sound change, more bass, more trebble, things like that
This specific video wasn’t made to be a scientific analysis over the build styles of the brands, just wanted to show off some cool guitars from cool brands 👍🏻
@@christianjbakermusic thats ok. I understand now. Thank you for reply me.
Love them all. They're actually pretty different guitars so it's kind of like comparing apples to oranges. The Taylor is a cutaway Grand Auditorium size with Taylor's V Bracing. The Martin is a dread with spruce and rosewood (classic pairing) and the Gibson is spruce and Koa (which I find more articulating than rosewood). Just goes to show that you need to play and hear a guitar before picking the one that's best for you. That Hummingbird is a beauty though...
This Taylor 814 doesn’t seem to have V brace (no black nut). And I agree with you about the comparisons.
The Taylor guitars come with Elixar strings which make them pitchy. I quickly changed the strings to medium Martin's and wala the perfect sound.
AMAZING BROTHER!!!!!! BRAVO ❤️🙏❤️🙏
Dreadnought Martins have a bell-like top and a rich, but not boomy bottom, especially when strung with an.011 Martin Monel set which I prefer. They are not extremely mid-pushed like a Gibson. I like a Martin's balance. They ring forever with complex harmonic detail. Their slightly high action likely accounts for this.
Gibsons sound like Gibsons. More mid than either top or bottom, they don't ring out like a Martin or as complexly, but feel a little lighter to play. Perhaps the 24 3/4" Gibson scale length compared to the Martin's 25 1/4" makes the difference. Gibsons have a definite character that instantly reveals what it is, which is very good.
I'm not a fan of the sound of Taylor guitars. To my ears they have little soul or substance. They feel and sound like acoustic guitars made for primarily electric players. I do not appreciate the compromise.
Taylor 814 is a completely different body style than the Gibson or Martin! It's gonna sound different...
I own a Custom Shop Taylor and I am purchasing a 1942 Martin 000-18 right now and I used to own a 1972 Martin D12-18 - I have to agree that you can not compare those Brands at all with each other. They sound completely different but both amazingly good!
Love that "Amazing Grace." :)
The Gibson sounded great and it will just get better with the wood ageing. I wish he would have told us the difference in the price of each guitar.....
It was very close between the Martin and the Gibson. The Gibson is a bit too ornate for my tastes so I'd choose the Martin.
Would love to see a comparison like this with a high end Yamaha guitar too, I truly think they deserve a spot in the big three, or four!
I had an Alvarez Yari that resembles the Gibson. All the markings and sound
The Hummingbird hands down in my humble opinion
Sound would have me taking home the Taylor. Looks category, I Lean towards the Taylor. Playability? I can only imagine since I can't play what is on the PC monitor. Great video. Thank you..
Got a Bird Custom 2012 in my 14 guitar collection….coco old back and sides. Buy and sell from time to time but the Bird is for keeps!!
Martin, hands down. All day, every day. The tone is heads and shoulders above the others. Those mids and lows. To die for. That's why I own a D-35.
I own a 1974 D12-35 Wonderful guitar. I remember walking into the music store in Great Falls, MT when I was an airman and picking up a D12-35. I took one strum and knew I had to have it.
Gibson and Martin have the best overall BALANCED tone and projection. The 00 and Dreadnaught models from both companies are iconic for a reason. I own one of each and hopefully will acquire another couple in my lifetime. I wouldn’t throw an 814 in the trash but Jerry Reed or Chet Atkins probably would. It’s the perfect skewed tone for a modern church player with more flash and money than substance and tradition.