"The French Navy operates 240 Rafale Marine..." The French Navy does NOT operate 240 Rafale Marine. Their original intended purchase was for 86 Rafle Ms only and it was cut to only 60. 240 would be the figure for both French Air Force and Navy Rafales of various Marks... and I'm unsure if all of those have been delivered yet.
@@brokenwarrior7007 So? My comment was concerned only with the innaccurate statement that the Marine Nationale operated 240 Rafale Ms. That's all. Whether the French choose to lease some of their Rafale Ms to India to facilitate training is another matter- and it would make sense from their standpoint as one of the ways of sweetening the deal so the Indian Navy chose the Rafale M. and India benefits from early access. So everybody wins.
@@babudominickattappana2355 Given that the French are not DEVELOPING a Rafale M with 5th Generation capabilities, I find your comment a bit puzzling. As for the variant the Indian Navy is purchasing, the F4R, it is the most up to date variant anyway. As such it will be coming close to what you said you wanted the Indian Navy to procure. So I really don't understand your comment.
Within visual range, the Rafale M would be in a very dominant position against a Super Hornet in almost all circumstances. The Super Hornet has low energy retention and acceleration capabilities, and its performance falls off dramatically with external loads and at altitudes above 25,000ft. The Rafale M itself is most at home at altitudes below 35,000ft and can best the Super Hornet in instantaneous and sustained turn rate at all comparable loadings at all altitudes. Jai hind from 🇺🇸
@@vaimurthy logistics, better weapons, commonality with IAF, OEM more reliable and these units can be transferred to IAF once TEDBF joins service. There are more but these are the most prominent ones.
@@userx946 First of all navy and airforce dont have common maintenance. Regarding reliability, if US wants to cripple they can do without F18 with every other local jet is powered by US engine. Purely interms of performance and cost F18 beat Rafale M.
@@vaimurthy they do use common maintenance and source of parts for MiG-29. Bringing in a new jet in limited quantity for 10 to 12 years is absurd and expensive. US can do very little as of now as most indigenous jets are not operational currently and eventually AMCA and TEDBF are scheduled to acquire a new engine other than F-414. Also according to reports Rafale M has met all requirements so all good here. Performance wise Rafale M is good enough as well.
@@userx946 New engine is long way, we are yet to identify partner. Development and testing time will make it available 2035 - 2040. So TEDBF, AMCA and MK2 all will have GE engines for next 15 years. We have many more systems of US origin. Rafale M is more expensive than F18 and F18 has better capability.
Since American weapon comes with conditions and America is known for sanctioning countries. So FA-18 being the best aircraft offered, Ind Navy went ahead with Rafale M. In defence deals best aircraft is not selected but which govt support you on geopolitical/International issues that get the deal.
all our indigenous jets are going to be powered by american engines. Even navy operates P8 and helicopters from USA. If US wants to punish they can punish easily without F18.
@@vishu9254 It does not matter, if US wants to cripple they can do without F18 is the point. When we can buy weapons for US support, what is stopping us from buying them for F18
@@le_ecrivaine what America did with F16 of Pakistan and Turkey is well known.. And recently in Ukraine America provided weapon with condition. Whole world knows how American weapon come.
@@le_ecrivaine already mentioned we have some platform of American origin.. But we don't want to depend on uncle Sam (USA) .. That's why India/Modi ji chose French Rafale for IAF & Navy inspite superior American platform. 🤣
So what ???? The French Navy operates 240 Rafael Maritime which is good enough. IAF is already operating 36 Rafaels so it has the necessary infrastructure and facilities to support Rafaels. The US have behaved treacherously by supplying $ 450 MN Spares and upgrades for the Paki F-16s
A welcome decision by the navy, People can argue if it is a good or a bad decision but I had read somewhere that taking no decision or delays is worce than bad decision, as is evident fron MRFA and 75i, I hope that there will be a Decision on those too, sooner rather than later.
Rafael m should be able to integrated with indigenous weapons by dassault aviation and then certified and transfer or give us the ip rights to integrate ourselves with our latest weapons and future weapons under development..
Selection took months and then price negotiation will take few more months , some objects from other vendors might be , may be opposition will jump due to various factors.. we are seeing delays in each and every steps
Happy 😊 😃 😀 To see 👀 Robots 🤖 in Indian 🇮🇳 Army !!! Will be happy 😊 😃 😀 if Robots 🤖 are soon made 👌 😀 😄 to do our House 🏠 Hold Works 💪 👷♂️ 😄 and Services also 😄 😀 😉 😊 😆
Right decision. France is historically much reliable country for India and india is familiar with French defence equipments since last 40-50 year s .so selection is right.
"Rafale Marine met all criteria" wow what a joke, 1. There is no video of Rafale M doing the ski jump take off at INS Hansa, only the video after it had taken off, F/A-18 E/F has done the test 2. the Navy required both single seat and twin seat version, Does Rafale have a twin seat carrier version? They dont, there are Rafale M twin seat in operation but they are not carrier based, they are operated from Air strip, 3. Indian navy required the plane to have folding wings so that more planes can be used and storage will be better, Rafale M does not have folding wings, India should just inform that this is political deal or that we dont have confidence to buy F/A-18 from USA. Also one of the advantage of F/A-18 E/F is that it has more powerful engine, hence it can take off from our ski jump carrier with more optimum load than Rafale, French navy operates 240 Rafale M? I dont know who wrote it, but total Rafale produced is 240, these include 100 for French air force 46 for French Marine, 36 for IAF , 24 with Egypt, You need someone who has better research skills
@@coolkal7590 1. Rafale M, less powerful engine, will have reduced warload when taking off from Ski jump carrier, F/A-18 E/F comes with powerful engine, GE-F414 is more powerful engine than M-88 engine on Rafale, If India insists on the EPE version, then it would have far better thrust thus, F/A-18 can take off with full load from carrier. 2. Rafale and F-18 have the same generation, try not to get into the marketing sense, any company can give you crap that their plane is 5th Gen, even F-35 is not truly 5th gen, 3. F/A-18 comes with better avionics, and more dedicated GROWLER version which can conduct Electronic warfare, also since its engine generate more power, it will be able to use more power than what Rafale can. 4. Since Rafale does not have folding wings, hence the wingtip rails have to be removed MANUALLY each time the plane has to be sent down the lift to the hangar, also before the take off, the rails have to be installed on the wingtips & then the missile has to be put on these rails, its crucial time. On a carrier, time and space are premium which we shall be failing to consider if we go for Rafale. 4. What about the Indian navy wanting Twin seater carrier based plane? Rafale M does not have that, thus the Navy has to take single seat version, thus it might seem that the Navy can change its "tough" requirement, if right hands in navy are greased.
Rafale-M met all criteria, while the F/A-18 EXCEEDED most criteria. Ok... I know it's being blamed on Anerica being less preferred than France, but I wonder if this isn't another example if India having a "Good enough" mindset that leaves them perpetually behind?
Slowly but surely, the right decisions are being made (far too slow by my standards but oh well). Inducting high quality equipment, standardization (fewer platforms to complete the same task), increased indigenization, reforms..... Modi is getting the job done.
Good decision the rafale is more capable in electronic warfare and networking. The F15 is bigger can carry bigger loads but is an old plane renewed but the 1st one flew in 1971 i believe; is a end of 60:s design.
1. Rafale M, less powerful engine, will have reduced warload when taking off from Ski jump carrier, F/A-18 E/F comes with powerful engine, GE-F414 is more powerful engine than M-88 engine on Rafale, If India insists on the EPE version, then it would have far better thrust thus, F/A-18 can take off with full load from carrier. 2. Rafale and F-18 have the same generation, try not to get into the marketing sense, any company can give you crap that their plane is 5th Gen, even F-35 is not truly 5th gen, 3. F/A-18 comes with better avionics, and more dedicated GROWLER version which can conduct Electronic warfare, also since its engine generate more power, it will be able to use more power than what Rafale can. 4. Since Rafale does not have folding wings, hence the wingtip rails have to be removed MANUALLY each time the plane has to be sent down the lift to the hangar, also before the take off, the rails have to be installed on the wingtips & then the missile has to be put on these rails, its crucial time. On a carrier, time and space are premium which we shall be failing to consider if we go for Rafale. 4. What about the Indian navy wanting Twin seater carrier based plane? Rafale M does not have that, thus the Navy has to take single seat version, thus it might seem that the Navy can change its "tough" requirement, if right hands in navy are greased.
Only 18 f18 can fit in aircraft carriers avaialble in indiawhere as 24 rafael aircraft can fit in further france has its offered its own twin seat aircraft for training and if our TEDBF becomes reality, these assets can be moved to off shore or IAF. Rafael has great payload and higher flying ceiling, the amount of misinformation carried out by you tube defense channels against rafael M regarding lift size shows that these channels are also suspectable to greasing, so take everthing with a bit of salt
@@jaswa0073 its not about being Advanced but having knowledge about the products that are being evaluated and also the requirements, Have been following the developments very closely, hence this advance knowledge, further there is no official news about this yet,
@@vaimurthy I think f18 has arnd 17.7kpounds and Rafal can carry 20kpounds. Further Rafal has stealth features, higher & faster speed, better BVR ordinace + Importantly no US attached strings & Tantrums + one more vendor...so on. Both r good but i feel Rafal has edge due above points but yes F18 gas better Radar, but if India goes with Rafal M4 series than its super dupet for India
26 naval carrier borne Dassault Rafale M4-R multi role fighter interceptor is just isn't enough for the Indian Navy . . . as it is the navy is suffering from under capacity, why create more compromises . . . this is exactly why private sector equity participation in future naval acquisitions is so very very necessary . . . a fleet of 53 brand new carrier borne Dassault Rafale M4-R multi role fighter interceptor is more appropriate than just 26 units . . . it'll complement the (yet to be ordered) 26 carrier borne Dassault Rafale M4-R multi role fighter interceptor that are already on the shopping list as in this video . . .
My opinion is that we should go with the FA 18 Hornets It will help in the interoperability between the USA 🇺🇸 And enhance the upcoming nuclear submarine project we might have their Assistance
Navy should go for fa18 which is cheaper and with latest systems and more combat proven times with a better technology n systems it comes along...i think the only reason is rafale offer more transfer of technology
@@le_ecrivaine i didn’t say we don’t use any of their aircrafts or equipments. We must avoid what we can. The more we depend on someone the worse it is for us when situations change.
So IAF asked for 90 Rafales Got 26 (deferred) Need another 64 Think we should settle for 54 more Rafales & keep rest of the powder dry for something better (5th gen) 😉 But the engine deal needs to be settled first
@@No_One_0912 BJP did that out of party fund and state funded ads were about schemes and benefits promotion. Eg jan dhan account Rather than AAP which every month brings different ad on same topic of education and self promotion (eg during covid many ads were launched across India by a state pol part I.e. asking to refrain and protect against covid.... didnt the nation knew about that ??) Perhaps u Pakistani heart "kom" can't understand as u r real enemy of India like ur ancestors who voted for pak but stayed back.
What's Your Opinion : "26 Rafale-M Deal By March" ?
ＬＩＫＥ | ＣＯＭＭＥＮＴ | ＳＨＡＲＥ | ＳＵＢＳＣＲＩＢE
Good but what about the lift size?
bhai lift me nahi aa raha to sign kese ho rahi hai deal 😐
Welcome move
Rafale M is a better choice in the long run.
Great Will come to IAF ultimately ;) A separate (& inferior) platform for just 26 aircraft was absurd
"The French Navy operates 240 Rafale Marine..."
The French Navy does NOT operate 240 Rafale Marine. Their original intended purchase was for 86 Rafle Ms only and it was cut to only 60.
240 would be the figure for both French Air Force and Navy Rafales of various Marks... and I'm unsure if all of those have been delivered yet.
Yes and we will receive 6-7 of em for training and testing, rest will be recieved in span of 3 years
@@brokenwarrior7007 So?
My comment was concerned only with the innaccurate statement that the Marine Nationale operated 240 Rafale Ms. That's all.
Whether the French choose to lease some of their Rafale Ms to India to facilitate training is another matter- and it would make sense from their standpoint as one of the ways of sweetening the deal so the Indian Navy chose the Rafale M. and India benefits from early access. So everybody wins.
True, france dont even have that much carriers to operate Rafale M
Instead of F3 varient we .must buy RAFALE - M with 5th generation capanabilities
@@babudominickattappana2355 Given that the French are not DEVELOPING a Rafale M with 5th Generation capabilities, I find your comment a bit puzzling.
As for the variant the Indian Navy is purchasing, the F4R, it is the most up to date variant anyway. As such it will be coming close to what you said you wanted the Indian Navy to procure.
So I really don't understand your comment.
Rafale M was the obvious Choice....
🇮🇳🇨🇵💖
JAI HIND 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Within visual range, the Rafale M would be in a very dominant position against a Super Hornet in almost all circumstances. The Super Hornet has low energy retention and acceleration capabilities, and its performance falls off dramatically with external loads and at altitudes above 25,000ft. The Rafale M itself is most at home at altitudes below 35,000ft and can best the Super Hornet in instantaneous and sustained turn rate at all comparable loadings at all altitudes.
Jai hind from 🇺🇸
But Super Hornet is a legend and has proven itself in numerous conflicts.
@@caelum2185 well a jet Is purchased based on its performance not by a legend tag
@@Sonia_Godfray_Hindu no, experience matters a lot miss sherni.
@@Sonia_Godfray_Hindu do you have any idea how Israeli Air Force used Mirages to defeat better “performance” soviet jets.
@@caelum2185 can't have a jet that uncle sam can stop sending Spares for whenever they wish rafael is way better choice
No Official report has come that F 18 is rejected or that deal will be signed by march.
Rafale M is a better choice in the long run for various reasons.
what are those?
@@vaimurthy logistics, better weapons, commonality with IAF, OEM more reliable and these units can be transferred to IAF once TEDBF joins service. There are more but these are the most prominent ones.
@@userx946 First of all navy and airforce dont have common maintenance. Regarding reliability, if US wants to cripple they can do without F18 with every other local jet is powered by US engine. Purely interms of performance and cost F18 beat Rafale M.
@@vaimurthy they do use common maintenance and source of parts for MiG-29. Bringing in a new jet in limited quantity for 10 to 12 years is absurd and expensive. US can do very little as of now as most indigenous jets are not operational currently and eventually AMCA and TEDBF are scheduled to acquire a new engine other than F-414. Also according to reports Rafale M has met all requirements so all good here. Performance wise Rafale M is good enough as well.
@@userx946 New engine is long way, we are yet to identify partner. Development and testing time will make it available 2035 - 2040. So TEDBF, AMCA and MK2 all will have GE engines for next 15 years. We have many more systems of US origin. Rafale M is more expensive than F18 and F18 has better capability.
So all that talk of "Wing fold", "Small lift" falls by the wayside. The Best fighter jet selected. WTG!
Since American weapon comes with conditions and America is known for sanctioning countries. So FA-18 being the best aircraft offered, Ind Navy went ahead with Rafale M. In defence deals best aircraft is not selected but which govt support you on geopolitical/International issues that get the deal.
all our indigenous jets are going to be powered by american engines. Even navy operates P8 and helicopters from USA. If US wants to punish they can punish easily without F18.
@@vaimurthy engines came without any condition.. We need support of US also.. So India bought some platform from US.
@@vishu9254 It does not matter, if US wants to cripple they can do without F18 is the point. When we can buy weapons for US support, what is stopping us from buying them for F18
@@le_ecrivaine what America did with F16 of Pakistan and Turkey is well known.. And recently in Ukraine America provided weapon with condition. Whole world knows how American weapon come.
@@le_ecrivaine already mentioned we have some platform of American origin.. But we don't want to depend on uncle Sam (USA) .. That's why India/Modi ji chose French Rafale for IAF & Navy inspite superior American platform. 🤣
Please note, French nevy doesn't have that many Rafale M. At the end they have only one career.
So what ???? The French Navy operates 240 Rafael Maritime which is good enough.
IAF is already operating 36 Rafaels so it has the necessary infrastructure and facilities to support Rafaels.
The US have behaved treacherously by supplying $ 450 MN Spares and upgrades for the Paki F-16s
Yes its a false information
French army operate 240 rafael
Not Navy
@@sureshrao2695 only spares no upgrades
@@techeves6024 not a great relief for us
@@sureshrao2695 mates it's just fixes and spares that's all nothing new us just wants to fix paks aging f 16 jets
For BEL just for information the lithium ion batteries works average in winter season or where the temperature drops in minus.
A welcome decision by the navy,
People can argue if it is a good or a bad decision but I had read somewhere that taking no decision or delays is worce than bad decision, as is evident fron MRFA and 75i,
I hope that there will be a Decision on those too, sooner rather than later.
Jai Hind 😻🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳😻
0:18 😂 good timing ⏱
2:15...that robot running like a real dog..🤣🤣🤣
Jai Hind🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Bharat Mata ki Jai
Jai Hind 🇮🇳
Rafael m should be able to integrated with indigenous weapons by dassault aviation and then certified and transfer or
give us the ip rights to integrate ourselves with our latest weapons and future weapons under development..
HAL should also provide naval version of tejas mk1a till the time TEDBF is launched.
It is better for the HAL to increase the quantity of manufacturing the TEJAS MK1A , than trying Naval version of TEJASs .
Great news...first comment..love ur channel
Jai Hind Vande Mataram 🧡 🤍 💚
Great info as always.👍
Any updates on accident in Andaman and Nicobar command.
Selection took months and then price negotiation will take few more months , some objects from other vendors might be , may be opposition will jump due to various factors.. we are seeing delays in each and every steps
Happy 😊 😃 😀 To see 👀 Robots 🤖 in Indian 🇮🇳 Army !!! Will be happy 😊 😃 😀 if Robots 🤖 are soon made 👌 😀 😄 to do our House 🏠 Hold Works 💪 👷♂️ 😄 and Services also 😄 😀 😉 😊 😆
Happy 😊 😃 😀 to see our Honourable Minister Mr. Piyush Goyal Minister of Industries receiving Files for Narine Rafale Fighter Jets 👏 💪 😀
Jai Hind 🇮🇳❤️
Jai Hind!
JAI HIND
Please let me know if indian navy is buy new or used rafale jets
By the way what happened to the test which has to be done between 4 and 6 January.
Right decision. France is historically much reliable country for India
and india is familiar with French defence equipments since last 40-50 year s .so selection is right.
Mr . Macron what about SsNs
Please add time stamps in your videos.
Did navy announced this news 📰?
News reports are breaking in france.
Same few news agencies from France reported last time, there are kick backs in 36 Rafael deal.. 😎🙄
Good decision. Will save costs as many parts will be similar to that fighter used by airforce.
Thank you, you have enabled English subtitle.....
Good decission on rafale marine. france should set up a factory in india to build rafales
It would be better if we say India selected Rafale over FA-18 instead of rejected. The aircraft is excellent but India has political compulsions.
Guys is rafale m for navy is it officially confirmed or not confirmed yet
Fast autonomous unmanned swarm boats DRDO-Sagar Defence venture Kal ka news aj 😊
Jai hind🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
"Rafale Marine met all criteria" wow what a joke,
1. There is no video of Rafale M doing the ski jump take off at INS Hansa, only the video after it had taken off, F/A-18 E/F has done the test
2. the Navy required both single seat and twin seat version, Does Rafale have a twin seat carrier version? They dont, there are Rafale M twin seat in operation but they are not carrier based, they are operated from Air strip,
3. Indian navy required the plane to have folding wings so that more planes can be used and storage will be better, Rafale M does not have folding wings,
India should just inform that this is political deal or that we dont have confidence to buy F/A-18 from USA.
Also one of the advantage of F/A-18 E/F is that it has more powerful engine, hence it can take off from our ski jump carrier with more optimum load than Rafale,
French navy operates 240 Rafale M? I dont know who wrote it, but total Rafale produced is 240, these include 100 for French air force 46 for French Marine, 36 for IAF , 24 with Egypt,
You need someone who has better research skills
Rafales are the next best thing to 5th gen F-18s are outdated dumps
@@coolkal7590 1. Rafale M, less powerful engine, will have reduced warload when taking off from Ski jump carrier, F/A-18 E/F comes with powerful engine, GE-F414 is more powerful engine than M-88 engine on Rafale, If India insists on the EPE version, then it would have far better thrust thus, F/A-18 can take off with full load from carrier.
2. Rafale and F-18 have the same generation, try not to get into the marketing sense, any company can give you crap that their plane is 5th Gen, even F-35 is not truly 5th gen,
3. F/A-18 comes with better avionics, and more dedicated GROWLER version which can conduct Electronic warfare, also since its engine generate more power, it will be able to use more power than what Rafale can.
4. Since Rafale does not have folding wings, hence the wingtip rails have to be removed MANUALLY each time the plane has to be sent down the lift to the hangar, also before the take off, the rails have to be installed on the wingtips & then the missile has to be put on these rails, its crucial time. On a carrier, time and space are premium which we shall be failing to consider if we go for Rafale.
4. What about the Indian navy wanting Twin seater carrier based plane? Rafale M does not have that, thus the Navy has to take single seat version, thus it might seem that the Navy can change its "tough" requirement, if right hands in navy are greased.
@@coolkal7590 you are wrong and be civilized in debate
Nice
Rafale M report has been shared by French media as per sources. Not confirmed by GoI.
Jai hind
France is a more reliable partner in long term
Rafale-M met all criteria, while the F/A-18 EXCEEDED most criteria. Ok...
I know it's being blamed on Anerica being less preferred than France, but I wonder if this isn't another example if India having a "Good enough" mindset that leaves them perpetually behind?
Weapons purchases are not just about the numbers. Geopolitics plays a significant part in it. Rafael-M will probably slightly more expensive .
Geo-politics apart we also chose the better aircraft
@@coolkal7590 personally, I just disagree on that point from a matter of performance. At least the stuff I'm aware of.
Rafale M is better at air to air while F/A-18E/F is better at air to ground. And since it's for Navy, I guess the Navy did a right thing?
We need full technology transfer, it should not be continued imports and imports
Jai Hind
I think India should stick to One type of aircraft and that is Rafael
Slowly but surely, the right decisions are being made (far too slow by my standards but oh well). Inducting high quality equipment, standardization (fewer platforms to complete the same task), increased indigenization, reforms..... Modi is getting the job done.
First view 🙏🏻👍
Nice video
🤣👍👍👍Rafale Marine...!
Now that's a 3 x 6-pack news for the evening !
Leed-acid ?
It's Lead - pronounced 'Let'... sh.t happens.😊
India must expedite these orders. Must also give orders for another atleast 72 rafales soonest.
Good decision the rafale is more capable in electronic warfare and networking. The F15 is bigger can carry bigger loads but is an old plane renewed but the 1st one flew in 1971 i believe; is a end of 60:s design.
This Time we need TOT of engine.
1. Rafale M, less powerful engine, will have reduced warload when taking off from Ski jump carrier, F/A-18 E/F comes with powerful engine, GE-F414 is more powerful engine than M-88 engine on Rafale, If India insists on the EPE version, then it would have far better thrust thus, F/A-18 can take off with full load from carrier.
2. Rafale and F-18 have the same generation, try not to get into the marketing sense, any company can give you crap that their plane is 5th Gen, even F-35 is not truly 5th gen,
3. F/A-18 comes with better avionics, and more dedicated GROWLER version which can conduct Electronic warfare, also since its engine generate more power, it will be able to use more power than what Rafale can.
4. Since Rafale does not have folding wings, hence the wingtip rails have to be removed MANUALLY each time the plane has to be sent down the lift to the hangar, also before the take off, the rails have to be installed on the wingtips & then the missile has to be put on these rails, its crucial time. On a carrier, time and space are premium which we shall be failing to consider if we go for Rafale.
4. What about the Indian navy wanting Twin seater carrier based plane? Rafale M does not have that, thus the Navy has to take single seat version, thus it might seem that the Navy can change its "tough" requirement, if right hands in navy are greased.
Then tell to modi n rajnath,, 😂😂😂
Think that ur far more advance thinking then our defence think tank n defence advisers of govt
Only 18 f18 can fit in aircraft carriers avaialble in indiawhere as 24 rafael aircraft can fit in further france has its offered its own twin seat aircraft for training and if our TEDBF becomes reality, these assets can be moved to off shore or IAF. Rafael has great payload and higher flying ceiling, the amount of misinformation carried out by you tube defense channels against rafael M regarding lift size shows that these channels are also suspectable to greasing, so take everthing with a bit of salt
@@jaswa0073 its not about being Advanced but having knowledge about the products that are being evaluated and also the requirements, Have been following the developments very closely, hence this advance knowledge, further there is no official news about this yet,
Corruption
I think an American Aircraft will win 114 MRFA contract.That’s why Rafael-M has been awarded navy contract.
May be f15ex
India will never go with American aircraft due to geopolitical situation in the comming future
@@hindidefence you mean P8, howitzer, engines for all indigenous jets, Apache, Chinook all these are russian origin?
@@harikumaran1981 f15 ex is a heavy fighter like su 30 🚫
@@le_ecrivaine i just put the sample not full list to make the point
French airforce operates 240 rafales not the French navy , kindly rectify the datas
Great..Rafael is much superior fighter than Bulkier/Heaviear/slower/older Super Hornet
are you serious? F18 has more powerful engine than Rafale and it has more payload carrying capacity.
@@arealist8565 he..he..Bhawna ko samjo bhai..spelling ko nahi
@@vaimurthy Yes it has more powerful engine bcoz it weighs more and it has low Power/weight ration in compariuosn to rafale
@@sidhupaji9038 No, F18 has better payload capacity than Rafale M.
@@vaimurthy I think f18 has arnd 17.7kpounds and Rafal can carry 20kpounds. Further Rafal has stealth features, higher & faster speed, better BVR ordinace + Importantly no US attached strings & Tantrums + one more vendor...so on. Both r good but i feel Rafal has edge due above points but yes F18 gas better Radar, but if India goes with Rafal M4 series than its super dupet for India
26 naval carrier borne Dassault Rafale M4-R multi role fighter interceptor is just isn't enough for the Indian Navy . . . as it is the navy is suffering from under capacity, why create more compromises . . . this is exactly why private sector equity participation in future naval acquisitions is so very very necessary . . . a fleet of 53 brand new carrier borne Dassault Rafale M4-R multi role fighter interceptor is more appropriate than just 26 units . . . it'll complement the (yet to be ordered) 26 carrier borne Dassault Rafale M4-R multi role fighter interceptor that are already on the shopping list as in this video . . .
In new systems procurement, indian navy is way faster than airforce and army.
Invitation to " yuan wang 5 bullock cart "
My opinion is that we should go with the FA 18 Hornets It will help in the interoperability between the USA 🇺🇸 And enhance the upcoming nuclear submarine project we might have their Assistance
@@le_ecrivaine He is only stating his opinion, no need to dash him about it. India is a democratic country afterall, isn't it?
French Navy operate 46 Rafael m not 240.
India super power in future 🇮🇳💪
Navy should go for fa18 which is cheaper and with latest systems and more combat proven times with a better technology n systems it comes along...i think the only reason is rafale offer more transfer of technology
who said that Rafale is offering ToT? They did not even meet offset condition for original Rafale deal and you expect them to ToT?
It is skrap. Whatrt happen to the nuklear power
Honestly I’m against American aircrafts at this point. They can put pressure on us through that. French is much more reliable.
Among western nations France is going to be the strategic partner Rest are for tidbits
@@le_ecrivaine i didn’t say we don’t use any of their aircrafts or equipments. We must avoid what we can. The more we depend on someone the worse it is for us when situations change.
Rafal
First of all French Air Force operates 240 Rafael not french nevy, please verify first the article that you are taking 🙏.
So IAF asked for 90 Rafales Got 26 (deferred) Need another 64 Think we should settle for 54 more Rafales & keep rest of the powder dry for something better (5th gen) 😉 But the engine deal needs to be settled first
IAF have 36 Raffles, while Navy will get 26 Raffles from France, in total there are 62 Raffles in India.
Hello bro
MRFA bhi karlo unke sath sath ye bhi thi bna lena
BMKJ
Now everyone know who will win mmrca 2
1st view and like
Opting Rafale could be due to the fact that US has now started donating to P@K in a big way!
INDIA LOST 70000 CR ON PAID PROTESTS AND RIOTS BY AAP POLITICAL WORKER TAHIR HUSSAIN. WE COULD HAVE USED SUCH MONEY FOR DEFENCE MODERNISATION
hr bar ek hi msg ..lg rha h nafrat faila rhe ho
bjp ne 6500 crore advertisement me kharch kr diye .. usko bhi use kiya ja sktatha
Fraud
Kejriwal seems to me like a tout.
@@No_One_0912 BJP did that out of party fund and state funded ads were about schemes and benefits promotion.
Eg jan dhan account
Rather than AAP which every month brings different ad on same topic of education and self promotion (eg during covid many ads were launched across India by a state pol part I.e. asking to refrain and protect against covid.... didnt the nation knew about that ??)
Perhaps u Pakistani heart "kom" can't understand as u r real enemy of India like ur ancestors who voted for pak but stayed back.
😎
hello
JH.....
1st view
Big mistake by Navy ..they should have selected F/A 18
Jai Hind Jai Modiji 🙏
100 like
Jay shree ram
F-18 will be a good choice for Aircraft Carrier because it has foldable wings
pirated videos.....should be reported
Only 26 aircraft ? That's not enough to country like India to counter enemies.
Jai hind
First view