911 EVERLASTING GOSPEL, Thank you for the encouragement. Hope you are well and serving the One True God. The end times are upon us and we must be strong together.
dougdelt, thank you for commenting. Paul represents so many things that counter the power of God, which is why I don't believe one man could have written all that is attributed to Paul.
@@hughwhitmore-author2031 Scholars concur. I tend to see the same voice yet regardless, the opus under "Paul" is not for God-fearers to listen to as "Paul" is so destructive of God's aim in our lives if we just follow Him.
@@douglasdeltondo7852, I agree. The line of truth comes from the Father through the son. God's truth is eternal and no matter how many times someone repeats Paul's false testimony, it will never be true. Thank you for contributing here. The seeds you have sown in the past have taken root in many places.
Luke Ng, that's a good suggestion! I always talk about the compilation of the bible briefly and in relation to Paul's false testimony being added, but the topic does go beyond that. I'll see if I can get around to it.
I have come to this conclusion a few months ago. I have tried to share this with others but have been rejected. Your videos on this topic are spot on and efficient. Try reading the apocryphal text called the testament of Benjamin whom Paul or Saul otherwise known as sheol is of the tribe of Benjamin known as the ravening wolf. In the Testament of Benjamin you will find verse 24 and 25 particularly interesting.
@brianmacuska7256, It's wonderful to hear that you love the Father and the son so much that you could sense the danger from Paul. God is rejoicing over your soul! I've read some first century Christian literature, but I have not heard of the testament of Benjamin, so thank you for bringing it to my attention. Thank you also for the offer of a blessing. We are a growing group of God's elect. We will often be rejected when spreading the truth because Paul represents a lie, and people in our age prefer to be lied to for their comfort. Keep moving toward the Father and the son and all things will be revealed to you. Check in here any time you like.
Broad or popular is the path to destruction. I verily enjoyed your reasoning of the falling away would be from Paul and the end would come when the WORD is shared sans paul. I always thought the falling away would be the ecclesia realizing a pre-trib Rapture wasn't in the cards. Your explanation hit home instead of guessing. You are truly a watchmen doing YAHs work. Thank you.
@@forYAHSglory, I'm happy to hear that you have turned from the false prophet and false apostle, Paul. Also, thank you for your kind words of support. It's always nice to hear positive things from God's elect. Regarding the falling away, Paul's false version of the trigger for the end times being his fake "man of perdition" is designed to keep believers looking for some evil world leader in our time when in fact it is the discovery of Paul's false writings and the return to the kingdom gospel that will drive us deeper into the end times. Jesus said in Matthew 15:16: " “Therefore when you see the ‘abomination of desolation,’ spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place” (whoever reads, let him understand), “then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains." Paul's false testimony is that abomination of desolation standing in the holy place, because since Jesus left the earth and God's tabernacle is now in heaven, the holy place is the bible, and Paul's lies are the abomination in this holy place. Our savior and protector, Jesus of Nazareth, said in Matthew 24:14 the trigger for the end times would be: "And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in all the world as a witness to all the nations, and then the end will come." Thank you again for writing. Keep moving toward the Father and the son and all things will be revealed to you.
This channel is good for correction, reproof, and enlightenment. I will consume your content as swiftly as life will allow. Are you sharing the word of YAH anywhere else? Thank you YAH bless.
Excellent work Hugh. I haven't seen all your videos about Paul except for part 1 and part 2. Hugh there is even a stronger case against Paul which Jesus himself prophesied about to his disciples of Paul. With this you can solidify your argument against Paul.....
Khaled T, thank you for your support and for watching my presentations. If you would like to explain your assertion that Jesus prophesied about Paul, please comment here again.
@@hughwhitmore-author2031 no problem Hugh as a Muslim I do also disregard Paul over Jesus. (I'm not here to debate but provide you with further evidence) In that regard ill continue God Willing.... We do know Paul was a Pharisee. Acts 23:6, Acts 26:5 & Phillipians 3:5. Jesus throughout his ministry rebukes and condemns the Pharisees to Hell. One Famous quote comes to mind. The beloved Jesus warns his Disciples. "Beware of the yeast of the Pharisees" This is only the tip of the iceberg My brother Hugh. There is huge explicit direct specific evidences in the Gospels themselves. You gave it from the Disciples now we can turn to our beloved Jesus.
@@Khal999, that is a good point because Paul brags about being a Pharisee, and a Roman citizen as well. This high rank in the ruling Satanic society is how Paul was able to arrange and supervise the public murder of the disciple Stephen in Acts 7 without fear of punishment from either the Jews or the Romans. And further to your point, in Revelation 2:2 Jesus says to the church at Ephesus: "“I know your works, your labor, your [b]patience, and that you cannot [c]bear those who are evil. And you have tested those who say they are apostles and are not, and have found them liars; " This liar is Paul. Thanks for the reminder that studious Muslims are aware that Paul is a false prophet.
@@hughwhitmore-author2031 Paul clearly tells us he is from the tribe of Benjamin Philippians 3:5. Benjamin is described as a Ravenous Wolf. Genesis 49:27 Jesus warnes his disciples of Paul in Gospel of Mathew 17:15-20. Not only Paul is a Ravenous Wolf in sheeps clothing. He is also from a bad tree which cannot bear good fruits. A Pharisee and a son of a Pharisee
I forgot to share something else with you the last time I commented. It's an encyclopedia-style description of Saul from a now defunct website called "One-Evil". Whomever operated the website created lists of the "Most Evil" people from every century dating back to the 1st which is the list which includes Saul of Tarsus. I don't know who authored the entry and what's even stranger is there is not a single source for any of the information pertaining to Saul or his background, but when you peruse it you will note how it reads as if it was written by a scholar specializing on Saul himself. Conducting further research into the names of the other people, places, and groups mentioned in the article does lead to information concerning Saul which I don't believe many people outside of very specific scholarly circles are even aware of. Here's the entry: Saul (Roman cognomen was Paul), whose real name was probably Nethanel (Dositheus) was born to the wealthy Jewish Sarmatian High Priest line in exile of the Tribe of Menasheh (Manasseh) living in Tarsus in Cilicia (Turkey) -born a year after the birth of John the Baptist. The ancestors of Saul included several infamous High Priests and claimed royal heritage to the Messiah line as a sub-branch of the House of Joseph. As part of the Kingdom of Israel, the territory of Menasheh was conquered by the Great Assyrian King Solomon Šulmanu-ašarid V (727 -722 BCE) and many were killed, taken as slaves or exiled. During this period, the ancestors of Saul developed a unique version of Judaism, which blended the occult and demonic gods of the Assyrians and Judaic beliefs to form the basis of the duality of Sadduceean mind. During the Hellenistic period following Alexander the Great, the ancestors of Saul helped form the Sebastaea faction in favour of Greek customs. Around 245-240 the High Priest of Israel was Manasseh- a name clearly identifying the tribe in opposition to the Egyptian High Priests of Yeb (Elephantine Island)- the Onias Line. When Manasseh was deposed, he built the Sarmatian Temple at Mount Gerizim, replacing the previous Temple, presumably with some of fortune generated whilst High Priest of Israel. Saul is also related through to the Manasseh (known as Menelaus), High Priest of Mount Gerizim (Samaritans) and High Priest of Israel 172-162 BCE who is infamously supposed to have alerted the Assyrians to the wealth hidden in the bowels of the Temple. This event has enormous political and social implications both for the priestly family of Saul (Paul of Tarsus) and the Sarmatians for when John Hyrcanus was in power, he beseiged Mount Gerizim and utterly destroyed the Temple and township of Shechem of 15,000 people to the ground. To add insult to injury in 31 BCE, the Roman commander Octavian gave Sarmara to the new king of Judaea, Herod the Great. When Octavian changed his name into Augustus, Herod changed Sarmara 's name into Sebaste (the Greek form of Augustus). The refugee High Priests of Sarmara first went first to Antioch and then further north into Turkey as the bitterness and hatred between the Sarmatian Jews and the Babylonian Yehudim (mainstream Jews) continued. These events explain why the priestly family of Saul found themselves exiled from their Sarmatian lands during the reign of the Hasmoneans and Herods, only returning under the later Roman reign of the Iudea province. The acceptance of Saul as a student of Gamaliel the Elder at his famous school in Jerusalem indicates two things: (1) Firstly, that the name Saul is not his true birthname, but a title he applied to himself later. Such a name midst the Pharisees, especially Gamaliel would have automatically disqualified him from entry as such a name was reserved for the first Messiah King and no priestly families, nor royal families had ever named their children Saul as a result; and (2) Some alliance between the Sarmatian High Priests in exile and the Pharisee movement of the House of Hillel must have occurred for Saul to have been accepted- a significant event considering the past hundred years of conflict and the fundamental antipathy between the Pharisee position and the Sarmatian position. Since the destruction of the Sarmatian temple on Mount Gerizim, the Sarmatians priests had prophecized of a coming messiah that would save them, rebuilt the temple and restrore their "rightful place" as spiritual leaders of the Israelites. Nethanel (Dositheus) took up this prophecy and started to claim himself as the not only the messiah foretold of the Sarmatians, but the messiah of all Jews. There is strong historical evidence to suggest this occured at the same time as the ministry of Jesus. As a full Roman citizen like Jesus, the Jewish authorities were powerless to act against him and in the year 36 CE he was arrested by Pontius Pilate known in history as Barabbus - which simply means "son of the father". In the famous episode with Pontius Pilate and the choosing of Jesus versus "Barabbus"- a choice between two Messiahs, it was Saul (Paul of Tarsus) as Barabbus who was freed and promptly sent into exile in Damascus. Around 43/44, High Priest Ananias travelled to Damascus to see Nethanel (Dositheus) to request his assistance in eliminating the Nazarenes. Nethanel agreed and by 49/50 had changed his name again to "Saul" as the first. As the founder and author of the synoptic gospels, Saul (Paul) synthesized a new religion based on the hatred of the mainstream Jews with himself representing equal status with Jesus as the messenger to the world. He travelled around the ancient world with his son Joseph, also known as Barnabus which means "son of the prophecy". After the public murder of the blood brother of Jesus, James the Just, Saul was arrested and taken to Rome. After deliberately calling for the burning of Rome, he was found guilty for his crimes and executed. His first religion, Dositheus continued within the Sarmatian community for around one hundred years and his second religion Paulinism found safety in England, Spain and the African coast after his execution. 200 years later, his religion of Paulinism was changed to the name Christianity with a merge with the Boethesians (High Priest version). The alliance never fully worked and the two halves have remained largely separate ever since their formation.
Smark Shillington, Thank you for the scholarly, secular, historical narrative on Paul. Reading it is like reading early Christian literature that was not included in the bible, in that it filled in gaps in the bible story with some information that appears to be correct, and some information that doesn't sound correct. I enjoyed what you sent because I'm fascinated with what the bible says, but I'm also fascinated with what is left out of the bible. The way I determine the plausibility of current-day claims about the bible is to use what I know to be true from historical patterns I have witnessed in my own lifetime, and then hold up these patterns against the claims made about the past. For example, I can tell the bible is true because the world is run by evil people who act as a unified group to accomplish one single thing, and that thing is to stop the truth of the bible by denying God's plan of salvation, which when fulfilled, will bring Jesus back to eternally punish the wicked. These evil people use lies to create conditions of Satanic ritual in the world that cause confusion, injury, and death. During this concocted strife, they pretend to be the ones trying to save the suffering, which is a ritual mocking of the Christ. All historical events have followed this pattern, and all events in the future will follow this pattern. The pandemic brought on to the earth by these Satan-worshippers is the current example. So, back to the article and its back-and-forth nature, it says Paul was in the line of Manasseh, but the person to whom Paul's writings are attributed in the bible says Paul was from Benjamin. However, the article does paint a picture of Paul as a high-ranking member of the evil ruling class of his time, which is accurate. Paul was able to publicly murder both men and women with no fear of punishment from either the Romans or the Jews. Also, it is believable that Paul changed his own name to Saul from an earlier given name to project himself as an elevated spiritual being. In the Old Testament Saul was anointed by God, but then he turned on God, (just as Satan turned on God,) and tried to kill David, just as Paul tried to kill the power of the anointed one of God, Jesus of Nazareth. Paul also sold himself to the followers of Jesus by faking his elevated spiritual status by his faked encounter with Jesus on the Damascus road, by his faked trip to the third heaven to receive revelation from God, and by his supposed ability to shake off the severe bite of a highly poisonous asp and suffer no ill effect. This all points to how the Satanists use their physical rituals to create spiritual power, which is a mocking of how God's plan of salvation is fulfilled when the obedient physical acts of His believers (works) turn into something spiritual, which is empowering glory for God. The article then suggests there is strong historical evidence for Paul being alive at the time of Jesus, which would support the position that the Paul of the bible was a real person who lived a real, contemporaneous life with Jesus, which is likely, because Paul is the typical, antithetical response the Satanists would send to respond to the power of the anointed Messiah. In other words, the existence of Paul, and Paul's false arguments against Jesus, prove that Jesus was real and that the spiritual power of Jesus existed and had to be destroyed. One point in the article that I have never heard, and is especially fascinating, is the suggestion that Paul was the Barabbas that Pilate set free so that the Jews could murder Jesus instead. I'm not going to say that this is true, because I can't prove it to be true, but again, it rings true because it falls into the pattern of how the Satanists run the world. A quick analogy is that the Satanists run all the countries in the world, so when a war is started, that war is agreed upon in advance between the leaders of the two countries. The starting and ending dates are set, the false political reasons for armed conflict are concocted, the amount of physical destruction and the number of the dead are agreed upon, and the war is waged as a ritual for Satan's glory. In the case of the murder of Jesus, I am certain that the leaders of the Romans and the Jews were in agreement on the crime prior to its commitment. The possibility that Paul, a prominent Jew of historical lineage, would be saved while Jesus was being murdered, is believable because it metaphorically represents a public correction of God's rejection of the Jews as the chosen people, which God did because of the evil they perpetrated upon His laws by whoring after other Gods. There had just been a huge spiritual shift where truth replaced lies in the world, and this conspiracy to murder brought the perpetration of lies back to its full, oppressive, and prominent place as the main operating principle in the world. At this general point, the article takes a turn away from any possible truth as it says that Paul was found guilty of crimes and executed. While the Satanists occasionally kill their own people to punish them for their misdeeds against Satan and to make an example of them, Paul never hurt the Satanists. What Paul did for the Satanist rulers is the most important event in the history of the secular world. Paul developed and popularized a lie that has smashed the power of the truth Jesus brought, and this lie has been ascendant and effective for nearly two-thousand years. Thus the Satanist retain control of God's earthly kingdom. Finally, the article claims that Paul wrote the Synoptic gospels, but if Jesus was real, and he was, this is not possible. I'm repeating myself, but Paul's writings, which are purely Satanic in nature, are part of the proof that the life and teachings of Jesus are real. Paul's writings represent the antithesis of the truth, so in summary, the article's purpose looks to be one of those scholarly attempts to mislead people who are highly educated and studious by producing a plausible secular background and then injecting lies where the spiritual bible information enters the analysis, which is a place very few people have full knowledge, so they just accept what is said of the bible without mastering the bible text for its spiritual proof. Thank you for the article. You've made my day. I love it when I get the chance to exercise my advanced knowledge of this one topic and appear to be smarter in general than I am on a normal, daily basis.
Can you do a video on Jesus and God? Is He God or just God’s Son? I know the trinity was a term that came up later but where does our worship rightfully go?
Danielle DiCianni, All glory must go to the Father because only He can store glory and use it to overcome Satan. This is why Jesus said of the end of the world in Matthew 24:36: "“But of that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, but My Father only." Only the Father can know how much glory He possesses. This is not to diminish the power of Jesus. In the end, as shown in the book of Revelation, once the Father becomes fully glorified, Jesus also is glorified by the church and becomes more like the Father. Prior to this future event, you have to keep in mind that there is only one God. Allow me to give you what I have said to others on this topic so you can consider it thoroughly and pray on it. You can always ask me more questions also. Here you go: When you look at the concept of a trinity, that is, three parts of God, there are a few things in the bible that could lead one to take the position of a trinity, but the evidence is overwhelming that there is only one God, and that He is the Father. The issue is a sensitive one, because it requires someone to state that Jesus is not God, and that bothers most Christians. God is the only one who is eternal backward and forward in time. God preceded creation, He transcends time, and He made all things. Supporters of the trinity point to John 1:2-3, which says of Jesus: "He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made." This is quoted to prove that Jesus is God, but actually shows that Jesus was present at the beginning of creation, but not before the beginning. John says, "all things were made through him," but things were not made by him. Jesus is the light of life, and God made things by sending glory through Jesus, but Jesus is not the creator. Jesus made nothing by himself. Jesus was given great power by the Father, but Jesus is not God. In Revelation 3:14, Jesus says: “These things says the Amen, the Faithful and True Witness, the Beginning of the creation of God,” showing again that Jesus was present at the beginning of creation but with no mention of his presence prior to creation. John 17:5 says: "And now, O Father, glorify Me together with Yourself, with the glory which I had with You before the world was." This again points to Jesus being the path for the glory of the Father to build creation, and being present at the moment of creation, but not being present before creation. There was time before creation, and only the Father existed in that time. There was only one who preceded time, as in Isaiah 43:10: “Before Me there was no God formed, Nor shall there be after Me,” Another indicator that God stands alone as the power behind creation is in Revelation 4:11: “You are worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honor and power; For You created all things.” That’s all things, including Jesus. Only God can offer eternal salvation, because only God created salvation as a way to earn back His stolen kingdom. Isaiah said in Isaiah 43:11: “I, even I, am the Lord, And besides Me there is no savior.” The Father made the son eternal into the future, as he will make us eternal when salvation is fulfilled and the eternal kingdom returns, but only the Father is eternal both in the past and into the future. Regarding the holy spirit, I believe it’s a power of the Father, but not a separate being. One problem with the holy spirit is that Jesus used the pronoun “he” for it, so that leads people to believe it is a part of God: “And I will pray the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He may abide with you forever- the Spirit of truth.” (John 14:16-17) However, all angels are referred to as male in the bible, and angles are made up purely of spiritual power, so I think this again leads to the holy spirit being a power available to God. Finally, to say that Jesus is not God does not diminish the position of Jesus. Jesus is the son of God. The messiah. The anointed one. The only one through whom we can reach the Father. Without the sacrifice of Jesus, we would not enjoy the ability to access the kingdom by repentance and baptism. However, Jesus never said to worship him, and to the contrary, he said to worship God, as in Matthew 6:6: "when you pray, go into your room, and when you have shut your door, pray to your Father who is in the secret place; and your Father who sees in secret will reward you openly."
Jeff Davis, I never said that. You did. You have obviously fallen for the false prophet, false apostle, and serial killer, Saul of Tarsus. You also obviously did not listen to my presentation, so there is no value in entering a dialogue with you.
Jeff Davis: Here are some questions you can ask yourself about your serial killer, Paul. Paul says in 1 Timothy 2:12: "I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man, but to be in silence." Also Paul said in 1 Corinthians 14: 34: "Let your women keep silent in the churches, for they are not permitted to speak; but they are to be submissive, as the law also says." The law never ordered women to be silent in church, and Jesus never said women should not speak up in the faith, so is Paul lying to keep women from serving God? If you are a woman do you shut up and keep your Christian opinions to yourself? This would mean that women can’t even teach Sunday school. If you are a man do you require Christian women to keep quiet about God and not teach you anything in any manner? You should if you believe in Paul. 2 John 1:1 refers to a woman as in the elect: “To the elect lady and her children, whom I love in truth, and not only I, but also all those who have known the truth.” John accepts a women as in God’s elect. So who is lying, Paul or John? Paul said in Ephesians 2:8-9 For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, 9 not of works, lest anyone should boast.” Jesus never mentioned the word “grace” one time and Jesus taught that salvation is earned by works. Jesus use the word “works” when describing salvation over fifty times. Who is telling the truth? Jesus or Paul? Revelation 20:12 says: “And I saw the dead, small and great, standing before God, and books were opened. And another book was opened, which is the Book of Life. And the dead were judged according to their works, by the things which were written in the books.” So is it Paul’s grace or Jesus’ works? James, the brother of Jesus, said in James 2:24: "You see then that a man is justified by works, and not by faith only," and Paul says we are justified by grace through faith. Who is telling the truth? What type of character does Paul have? In Acts 7:58, Paul is introduced to the bible story while supervising the public murder of the disciple, Stephen. In Acts 9:1 Paul is “breathing threats and murder against the disciples of the lord.” In Acts 22: 4, Paul admits he is a serial killer of both men and women: “I persecuted the followers of this way to their death, arresting both men and women, and throwing them into prison. In Acts 26:10 Paul says: “When they were put to death, I cast my vote against them.” Do you believe God would choose such an evil person? Paul admits he is a liar. Paul said he lied to spread the gospel in Romans 3:7: “ For if the truth of God has increased through my lie to His glory, why am I also still judged as a sinner?” Do God or Jesus allow us to lie to spread the gospel? Do you lie to spread the gospel? Paul lied about his supposed, miracle conversion. Paul told his conversion story three times in three different ways, in Acts 9, Acts 22 and Acts 26. Which story is correct and which did Paul lie about? Peter said in Acts 15:7 that he was sent by Jesus to bring the gospel to the Gentiles. Paul said in Acts 22:21 that he was sent by Jesus to bring the gospel to the Gentiles. Who is telling the truth? Jesus says in Revelation 2:2 to the church at Ephesus: "I know your works, your labor, your patience, and that you cannot bear those who are evil. And you have tested those who say they are apostles and are not, and have found them liars;" This church Jesus is speaking to is the church to whom Paul wrote that we are saved by grace and not by works, even though Jesus praised their works, so which lying apostle is Jesus speaking of? Do you think Paul is this liar Jesus speaks of? Jude, another brother of Jesus, said in Jude 1:4: " For certain men have crept in unnoticed, who long ago were marked out for this condemnation, ungodly men, who turn the grace of our God into lewdness and deny the only Lord God and our Lord Jesus Christ." Which person who changed the meaning of grace from its prior use do you think Jude was talking about? Jesus said the last thing that had to happen before the end time comes is: "And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in all the world as a witness to all the nations, and then the end will come." Paul said in 2 Thessalonians 2:3 that the last thing that had to happen before the end times comes is "Let no one deceive you by any means; for that Day will not come unless the falling away comes first, and the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition." Who is telling the truth, Paul or Jesus? And who is this man of perdition? Jesus named a man of perdition in John 17:12 when he spoke to the Father about the apostles: “While I was with them in the world, I kept them in Your name. Those whom You gave Me I have kept; and none of them is lost except the son of perdition, that the Scripture might be fulfilled.” Jesus says that Judas Iscariot is the man of perdition. Who is telling the truth? Jesus or Paul? Related to the preceding question, Jesus said, “the gospel of the kingdom,” and not the gospel of grace, so which gospel will commence the end times and bring Jesus back? All of the apostles chosen by Jesus were with him from the baptism of John until the ascension, and when Judas was replaced with Matthias, the same rules were used by the real apostles. Paul had none of these qualifications. How can Paul then call himself an apostle? Jesus promised the real apostles a reward in heaven in Matthew 19:28: "Assuredly I say to you, that in the regeneration, when the Son of Man sits on the throne of His glory, you who have followed Me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel." In Revelation, the real apostles are shown receiving a reward in the new kingdom. Paul is not shown as receiving a reward in the new kingdom. If Paul was chosen directly by Jesus to bring a new method of salvation and lead the entire church, why isn't Paul given a reward in heaven? In Matthew 23:9, Jesus said: "Do not call anyone on earth your father; for One is your Father, He who is in heaven." In 1 Corinthians 4:15, Paul said: "For though you might have ten thousand instructors in Christ, yet you do not have many fathers; for in Christ Jesus I have begotten you through the gospel." Is it OK that Paul disobeyed this command of Jesus? Jesus confirmed all of the ten commandments were required for salvation when he was teaching, except possibly Sabbath keeping. In 2 Corinthians 3:7 Paul called the ten commandments: "the ministry of death, written and engraved on stones." Why did Paul deny God's original laws?
WOMEN HEAD COVERINGS: 1 Corinthians chapter 11:4-15 4 Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head. +++HAVING LONG HAIR+++ 5 But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven. +++ HAVING SHORT HAIR +++ 6 For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered. +++ HAVING LONG HAIR +++ a woman who prayed or prophesied with her head uncovered it was the equivalent to her head being shaven.+++ 7 For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and esteem of Yahweh: but the woman is the esteem of the man. +++ HAVE LONG HAIR +++ 8 For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man. 9 Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man. 10 For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the Messengers. +++ MEN WERE TRYING TO USURP AUTHORITY OVER THE WOMAN +++ 11 Nevertheless neither is the man without the woman, neither the woman without the man, in Yahweh. 12 For as the woman is of the man, even so is the man also by the woman; but all things of Yahweh. 13 Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto YAHWEH uncovered? +++ WITH SHORT HAIR +++ 14 Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, IF A MAN HAVE LONG HAIR, IT IS A SHAME TO HIM? 15 But if a woman have long hair, it is a esteem to her: FOR HER HAIR IS GIVEN HER FOR A COVERING. +++ THIS VERSE 15 SAYS IT ALL +++ 16 But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the assemblies of Yahweh. BECAUSE THEY BELIEVED WOMEN SHOULD HAVE A HEAD COVERING TO WEAR. This was and is a man-made belief. Let your women keep silent in the assemblies for they have no permission to teach, but to be in subjection. 1 Corinthians 14 6. Now, brethren, if I come unto you speaking with tongues, what shall I profit you, except I shall speak to you either by revelation, or by knowledge, or by PROPHECYING, or by doctrine? 1 Corinthians 11:6 For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered. +++ HAVING LONG HAIR +++ a woman who prayed or PROPHESIED with her head uncovered it was the equivalent to her head being shaven.+++ 1 Corinthians 14:23 If therefore the whole assembly be come together into one place, and all speak with tongues, and there come in those that are unlearned, or unbelievers, will they not say that ye are mad? Scriptures prove you must have Yahweh’s Spirit infilling to be His. Men and Women alike. They all had the gifts of the Spirit, Men and Women. They did what the Spirit had them to do, Men and Women. They took the Word to the world doing miracles and healings with Yahweh working with them, male and female alike. 1 Corinthians 14:34-40 34. Let your women keep silence in the ASSEMBLIES: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. 35. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the assembly. 36. WHAT? came the word of Yahweh out from you? or came it unto you only?
Gary Stanfield, I just received this comment. TH-cam does not always alert me of all comments in a timely manner. Thank you for the significant amount of work it took to put together this long string of Paul's contradictions on this topic. That's an interesting point you make that true believers were possibly being set up to be poisoned. It's possible.
In Rev 2:2, Jesus must have been speaking of Paul as false apostle because Paul admits all Asia has left him. Church of Ephesians was Asia yes? Regarding Fathers... this concept was of course adopted by RCC, and probably why Paul is crucial to their doctrines of Constantine. The sabbath is counted... why would you think otherwise? Careful, dont use the same straw-man Paul uses lol. One thing bothers me though; you said to study GODS WORD at the end... but how could it be if Paul is a false apostle. We cant believe him right?
Mikey Strikey, thank you for your continuing comments. I agree with your analysis that in Rev 2:2 Jesus is speaking directly about Paul, and that Paul's admission that the churches in Asia have left him confirms it. Also, if you look at what Jesus says to each of the churches in chapters two and three of Revelation, they all point to Paul as false. Revelation as a book is a complete repudiation of Paul. Each admonition Jesus gives to the seven churches starts with "I know your works," which destroys Paul's lie of Ephesians 2:8-9 that we are saved by grace through faith and not by works. Regarding the Sabbath, after being corrected on this topic by several knowledgable believers, including you, I have stopped waffling and now I fully believe and practice that God still requires us to observe the Sabbath, but not in the Old Testament way. Now we observe Sabbath how Jesus observed it. Finally, regarding my request for all believers to study God's word, Paul is not God's word. The writings attributed to Saul of Tarsus are insertions by the Satanists to deny God's plan of eternal salvation. The Satanists use the method of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil by taking the truth and then offsetting and overcoming that truth with lies. You see this method in every aspect of daily life on the earth. Thanks again.
@@hughwhitmore-author2031 Well thank you Hugh... thats a relief to hear about the Sabbath. "My sheep hear my voice" and you just showed proof you are such. Congratulations and welcome to the fold. Your work here is awesome and I so much enjoy your videos. I agree totally about your version of Gods word... trouble is, 2 billion Christians believe ALL the Bible is Gods word, and so the point I try to make was that while Pauls apostasy remains in the bible... we really cannot regard it as all "Gods Word". Sure you and me and a few others can now discern and separate the WORD from the LIES, but others cannot. I know I am getting technical here, but the truth is, Christians in general will see you being hypocritical, if you speak against Paul, and yet at the same time call it Gods word,. Get my point friend? You know the kind; the simple minded who really love Paul and relegate Jesus to the rear suggesting Jesus is not our teacher but Paul is. It is these who need to know that Gods word is only what Jesus say... not Paul. You are doing Jesus a great service mate... all the best in your journey of truth. Love you brother. Like Jesus said... it is those who do the will of my father who are my brother sister and mother. Amen. One question... how do you keep your office so darn clean and tidy man?
@Mikey Strikey, I'm glad to be back in the fold on the Sabbath, so thanks for being a part of what brought me back. It wasn't that I was against the Sabbath, I was just trying to figure out what Jesus meant. As you say, Jesus is our teacher, but he's also our protector. Its Jesus who leads us to the truth. Thank you for your kindness. I feel the same way. The fellowship of those few of us who possess the whole truth of the Father is very rewarding. Regarding my neat office, my habit is that area of life is a bit over the top. I am fastidious to a fault, so if you come to stay with me sometime, which would be nice, you better make your bed each day. Hope to hear from you soon.
@@hughwhitmore-author2031 Hahaha... love your humour about the office mate. Will check out more of your videos in the future as time permits, so no doubt there will be some questions along the way. Take care. Peace and love from Oz.
"The Son of Man will send his angels and they will gather out of his kingdom all causes of sin and all law-breakers and throw them into the fiery furnace. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth." Matthew 13:41-42 I hope you repent Richard. Paul is a very very dangerous man.
@@richardfairweather2312 are you a demon possessed man? Is that why you're quoting the demon that attacked the 7 Sons of Sceva when "the Jesus Paul proclaims" had no effect over him?!
![Wolfram Physics Project: Working Session Wednesday, May 6, 2020 [Finding Black Hole Structures]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/qdVSOLL1mls/mqdefault.jpg)
![คบซ้อน - วงL.กฮ. [ Official MV ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/5MtesqJ0I1c/mqdefault.jpg)
so happy to see you back in full effect.. May YHVH bless you and your wife w/ all ur hearts desires
911 EVERLASTING GOSPEL, Thank you for the encouragement. Hope you are well and serving the One True God. The end times are upon us and we must be strong together.
Very good Hugh in son of perdition. New one.
dougdelt, thank you for commenting. Paul represents so many things that counter the power of God, which is why I don't believe one man could have written all that is attributed to Paul.
@@hughwhitmore-author2031 Scholars concur. I tend to see the same voice yet regardless, the opus under "Paul" is not for God-fearers to listen to as "Paul" is so destructive of God's aim in our lives if we just follow Him.
@@douglasdeltondo7852, I agree. The line of truth comes from the Father through the son. God's truth is eternal and no matter how many times someone repeats Paul's false testimony, it will never be true. Thank you for contributing here. The seeds you have sown in the past have taken root in many places.
Would like to hear a lesson on "How the Bible is compiled". Would appreciate if you can do one.
Luke Ng, that's a good suggestion! I always talk about the compilation of the bible briefly and in relation to Paul's false testimony being added, but the topic does go beyond that. I'll see if I can get around to it.
I have come to this conclusion a few months ago. I have tried to share this with others but have been rejected. Your videos on this topic are spot on and efficient. Try reading the apocryphal text called the testament of Benjamin whom Paul or Saul otherwise known as sheol is of the tribe of Benjamin known as the ravening wolf. In the Testament of Benjamin you will find verse 24 and 25 particularly interesting.
Also Isaiah 28 verse 15-19 is where you find Saul who's name is spelled Sheol in the old testament. YAH bless this ministry.
@brianmacuska7256, It's wonderful to hear that you love the Father and the son so much that you could sense the danger from Paul. God is rejoicing over your soul! I've read some first century Christian literature, but I have not heard of the testament of Benjamin, so thank you for bringing it to my attention. Thank you also for the offer of a blessing. We are a growing group of God's elect. We will often be rejected when spreading the truth because Paul represents a lie, and people in our age prefer to be lied to for their comfort. Keep moving toward the Father and the son and all things will be revealed to you. Check in here any time you like.
Broad or popular is the path to destruction. I verily enjoyed your reasoning of the falling away would be from Paul and the end would come when the WORD is shared sans paul. I always thought the falling away would be the ecclesia realizing a pre-trib Rapture wasn't in the cards. Your explanation hit home instead of guessing. You are truly a watchmen doing YAHs work. Thank you.
@@forYAHSglory, I'm happy to hear that you have turned from the false prophet and false apostle, Paul. Also, thank you for your kind words of support. It's always nice to hear positive things from God's elect. Regarding the falling away, Paul's false version of the trigger for the end times being his fake "man of perdition" is designed to keep believers looking for some evil world leader in our time when in fact it is the discovery of Paul's false writings and the return to the kingdom gospel that will drive us deeper into the end times.
Jesus said in Matthew 15:16: " “Therefore when you see the ‘abomination of desolation,’ spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place” (whoever reads, let him understand), “then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains." Paul's false testimony is that abomination of desolation standing in the holy place, because since Jesus left the earth and God's tabernacle is now in heaven, the holy place is the bible, and Paul's lies are the abomination in this holy place.
Our savior and protector, Jesus of Nazareth, said in Matthew 24:14 the trigger for the end times would be: "And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in all the world as a witness to all the nations, and then the end will come."
Thank you again for writing. Keep moving toward the Father and the son and all things will be revealed to you.
This channel is good for correction, reproof, and enlightenment. I will consume your content as swiftly as life will allow. Are you sharing the word of YAH anywhere else? Thank you YAH bless.
Excellent work Hugh. I haven't seen all your videos about Paul except for part 1 and part 2.
Hugh there is even a stronger case against Paul which Jesus himself prophesied about to his disciples of Paul. With this you can solidify your argument against Paul.....
Khaled T, thank you for your support and for watching my presentations. If you would like to explain your assertion that Jesus prophesied about Paul, please comment here again.
@@hughwhitmore-author2031 no problem Hugh as a Muslim I do also disregard Paul over Jesus. (I'm not here to debate but provide you with further evidence) In that regard ill continue God Willing....
We do know Paul was a Pharisee. Acts 23:6, Acts 26:5 & Phillipians 3:5.
Jesus throughout his ministry rebukes and condemns the Pharisees to Hell.
One Famous quote comes to mind. The beloved Jesus warns his Disciples. "Beware of the yeast of the Pharisees"
This is only the tip of the iceberg My brother Hugh. There is huge explicit direct specific evidences in the Gospels themselves. You gave it from the Disciples now we can turn to our beloved Jesus.
@@Khal999, that is a good point because Paul brags about being a Pharisee, and a Roman citizen as well. This high rank in the ruling Satanic society is how Paul was able to arrange and supervise the public murder of the disciple Stephen in Acts 7 without fear of punishment from either the Jews or the Romans. And further to your point, in Revelation 2:2 Jesus says to the church at Ephesus: "“I know your works, your labor, your [b]patience, and that you cannot [c]bear those who are evil. And you have tested those who say they are apostles and are not, and have found them liars; " This liar is Paul.
Thanks for the reminder that studious Muslims are aware that Paul is a false prophet.
@@hughwhitmore-author2031
Paul clearly tells us he is from the tribe of Benjamin Philippians 3:5.
Benjamin is described as a Ravenous Wolf. Genesis 49:27
Jesus warnes his disciples of Paul in Gospel of Mathew 17:15-20.
Not only Paul is a Ravenous Wolf in sheeps clothing. He is also from a bad tree which cannot bear good fruits. A Pharisee and a son of a Pharisee
@@Khal999, Well done on explaining Paul. Thanks for adding to the evidence here.
I forgot to share something else with you the last time I commented. It's an encyclopedia-style description of Saul from a now defunct website called "One-Evil". Whomever operated the website created lists of the "Most Evil" people from every century dating back to the 1st which is the list which includes Saul of Tarsus. I don't know who authored the entry and what's even stranger is there is not a single source for any of the information pertaining to Saul or his background, but when you peruse it you will note how it reads as if it was written by a scholar specializing on Saul himself. Conducting further research into the names of the other people, places, and groups mentioned in the article does lead to information concerning Saul which I don't believe many people outside of very specific scholarly circles are even aware of.
Here's the entry:
Saul (Roman cognomen was Paul), whose real name was probably Nethanel (Dositheus) was born to the wealthy Jewish Sarmatian High Priest line in exile of the Tribe of Menasheh (Manasseh) living in Tarsus in Cilicia (Turkey) -born a year after the birth of John the Baptist. The ancestors of Saul included several infamous High Priests and claimed royal heritage to the Messiah line as a sub-branch of the House of Joseph. As part of the Kingdom of Israel, the territory of Menasheh was conquered by the Great Assyrian King Solomon Šulmanu-ašarid V (727 -722 BCE) and many were killed, taken as slaves or exiled. During this period, the ancestors of Saul developed a unique version of Judaism, which blended the occult and demonic gods of the Assyrians and Judaic beliefs to form the basis of the duality of Sadduceean mind.
During the Hellenistic period following Alexander the Great, the ancestors of Saul helped form the Sebastaea faction in favour of Greek customs. Around 245-240 the High Priest of Israel was Manasseh- a name clearly identifying the tribe in opposition to the Egyptian High Priests of Yeb (Elephantine Island)- the Onias Line. When Manasseh was deposed, he built the Sarmatian Temple at Mount Gerizim, replacing the previous Temple, presumably with some of fortune generated whilst High Priest of Israel.
Saul is also related through to the Manasseh (known as Menelaus), High Priest of Mount Gerizim (Samaritans) and High Priest of Israel 172-162 BCE who is infamously supposed to have alerted the Assyrians to the wealth hidden in the bowels of the Temple. This event has enormous political and social implications both for the priestly family of Saul (Paul of Tarsus) and the Sarmatians for when John Hyrcanus was in power, he beseiged Mount Gerizim and utterly destroyed the Temple and township of Shechem of 15,000 people to the ground. To add insult to injury in 31 BCE, the Roman commander Octavian gave Sarmara to the new king of Judaea, Herod the Great. When Octavian changed his name into Augustus, Herod changed Sarmara 's name into Sebaste (the Greek form of Augustus).
The refugee High Priests of Sarmara first went first to Antioch and then further north into Turkey as the bitterness and hatred between the Sarmatian Jews and the Babylonian Yehudim (mainstream Jews) continued. These events explain why the priestly family of Saul found themselves exiled from their Sarmatian lands during the reign of the Hasmoneans and Herods, only returning under the later Roman reign of the Iudea province.
The acceptance of Saul as a student of Gamaliel the Elder at his famous school in Jerusalem indicates two things:
(1) Firstly, that the name Saul is not his true birthname, but a title he applied to himself later. Such a name midst the Pharisees, especially Gamaliel would have automatically disqualified him from entry as such a name was reserved for the first Messiah King and no priestly families, nor royal families had ever named their children Saul as a result; and
(2) Some alliance between the Sarmatian High Priests in exile and the Pharisee movement of the House of Hillel must have occurred for Saul to have been accepted- a significant event considering the past hundred years of conflict and the fundamental antipathy between the Pharisee position and the Sarmatian position.
Since the destruction of the Sarmatian temple on Mount Gerizim, the Sarmatians priests had prophecized of a coming messiah that would save them, rebuilt the temple and restrore their "rightful place" as spiritual leaders of the Israelites. Nethanel (Dositheus) took up this prophecy and started to claim himself as the not only the messiah foretold of the Sarmatians, but the messiah of all Jews. There is strong historical evidence to suggest this occured at the same time as the ministry of Jesus. As a full Roman citizen like Jesus, the Jewish authorities were powerless to act against him and in the year 36 CE he was arrested by Pontius Pilate known in history as Barabbus - which simply means "son of the father". In the famous episode with Pontius Pilate and the choosing of Jesus versus "Barabbus"- a choice between two Messiahs, it was Saul (Paul of Tarsus) as Barabbus who was freed and promptly sent into exile in Damascus.
Around 43/44, High Priest Ananias travelled to Damascus to see Nethanel (Dositheus) to request his assistance in eliminating the Nazarenes. Nethanel agreed and by 49/50 had changed his name again to "Saul" as the first. As the founder and author of the synoptic gospels, Saul (Paul) synthesized a new religion based on the hatred of the mainstream Jews with himself representing equal status with Jesus as the messenger to the world. He travelled around the ancient world with his son Joseph, also known as Barnabus which means "son of the prophecy". After the public murder of the blood brother of Jesus, James the Just, Saul was arrested and taken to Rome. After deliberately calling for the burning of Rome, he was found guilty for his crimes and executed.
His first religion, Dositheus continued within the Sarmatian community for around one hundred years and his second religion Paulinism found safety in England, Spain and the African coast after his execution. 200 years later, his religion of Paulinism was changed to the name Christianity with a merge with the Boethesians (High Priest version). The alliance never fully worked and the two halves have remained largely separate ever since their formation.
Smark Shillington, Thank you for the scholarly, secular, historical narrative on Paul. Reading it is like reading early Christian literature that was not included in the bible, in that it filled in gaps in the bible story with some information that appears to be correct, and some information that doesn't sound correct. I enjoyed what you sent because I'm fascinated with what the bible says, but I'm also fascinated with what is left out of the bible.
The way I determine the plausibility of current-day claims about the bible is to use what I know to be true from historical patterns I have witnessed in my own lifetime, and then hold up these patterns against the claims made about the past. For example, I can tell the bible is true because the world is run by evil people who act as a unified group to accomplish one single thing, and that thing is to stop the truth of the bible by denying God's plan of salvation, which when fulfilled, will bring Jesus back to eternally punish the wicked. These evil people use lies to create conditions of Satanic ritual in the world that cause confusion, injury, and death. During this concocted strife, they pretend to be the ones trying to save the suffering, which is a ritual mocking of the Christ. All historical events have followed this pattern, and all events in the future will follow this pattern. The pandemic brought on to the earth by these Satan-worshippers is the current example.
So, back to the article and its back-and-forth nature, it says Paul was in the line of Manasseh, but the person to whom Paul's writings are attributed in the bible says Paul was from Benjamin. However, the article does paint a picture of Paul as a high-ranking member of the evil ruling class of his time, which is accurate. Paul was able to publicly murder both men and women with no fear of punishment from either the Romans or the Jews.
Also, it is believable that Paul changed his own name to Saul from an earlier given name to project himself as an elevated spiritual being. In the Old Testament Saul was anointed by God, but then he turned on God, (just as Satan turned on God,) and tried to kill David, just as Paul tried to kill the power of the anointed one of God, Jesus of Nazareth. Paul also sold himself to the followers of Jesus by faking his elevated spiritual status by his faked encounter with Jesus on the Damascus road, by his faked trip to the third heaven to receive revelation from God, and by his supposed ability to shake off the severe bite of a highly poisonous asp and suffer no ill effect. This all points to how the Satanists use their physical rituals to create spiritual power, which is a mocking of how God's plan of salvation is fulfilled when the obedient physical acts of His believers (works) turn into something spiritual, which is empowering glory for God.
The article then suggests there is strong historical evidence for Paul being alive at the time of Jesus, which would support the position that the Paul of the bible was a real person who lived a real, contemporaneous life with Jesus, which is likely, because Paul is the typical, antithetical response the Satanists would send to respond to the power of the anointed Messiah. In other words, the existence of Paul, and Paul's false arguments against Jesus, prove that Jesus was real and that the spiritual power of Jesus existed and had to be destroyed.
One point in the article that I have never heard, and is especially fascinating, is the suggestion that Paul was the Barabbas that Pilate set free so that the Jews could murder Jesus instead. I'm not going to say that this is true, because I can't prove it to be true, but again, it rings true because it falls into the pattern of how the Satanists run the world. A quick analogy is that the Satanists run all the countries in the world, so when a war is started, that war is agreed upon in advance between the leaders of the two countries. The starting and ending dates are set, the false political reasons for armed conflict are concocted, the amount of physical destruction and the number of the dead are agreed upon, and the war is waged as a ritual for Satan's glory.
In the case of the murder of Jesus, I am certain that the leaders of the Romans and the Jews were in agreement on the crime prior to its commitment. The possibility that Paul, a prominent Jew of historical lineage, would be saved while Jesus was being murdered, is believable because it metaphorically represents a public correction of God's rejection of the Jews as the chosen people, which God did because of the evil they perpetrated upon His laws by whoring after other Gods. There had just been a huge spiritual shift where truth replaced lies in the world, and this conspiracy to murder brought the perpetration of lies back to its full, oppressive, and prominent place as the main operating principle in the world.
At this general point, the article takes a turn away from any possible truth as it says that Paul was found guilty of crimes and executed. While the Satanists occasionally kill their own people to punish them for their misdeeds against Satan and to make an example of them, Paul never hurt the Satanists. What Paul did for the Satanist rulers is the most important event in the history of the secular world. Paul developed and popularized a lie that has smashed the power of the truth Jesus brought, and this lie has been ascendant and effective for nearly two-thousand years. Thus the Satanist retain control of God's earthly kingdom.
Finally, the article claims that Paul wrote the Synoptic gospels, but if Jesus was real, and he was, this is not possible. I'm repeating myself, but Paul's writings, which are purely Satanic in nature, are part of the proof that the life and teachings of Jesus are real. Paul's writings represent the antithesis of the truth, so in summary, the article's purpose looks to be one of those scholarly attempts to mislead people who are highly educated and studious by producing a plausible secular background and then injecting lies where the spiritual bible information enters the analysis, which is a place very few people have full knowledge, so they just accept what is said of the bible without mastering the bible text for its spiritual proof.
Thank you for the article. You've made my day. I love it when I get the chance to exercise my advanced knowledge of this one topic and appear to be smarter in general than I am on a normal, daily basis.
Wish you would give rebuttal scripture of what Jesus says
Timothy Jerrow, Please clarify what you mean by "giving rebuttal scripture of what Jesus says," and I'll be able to answer your question.
Can you do a video on Jesus and God? Is He God or just God’s Son? I know the trinity was a term that came up later but where does our worship rightfully go?
Danielle DiCianni, All glory must go to the Father because only He can store glory and use it to overcome Satan. This is why Jesus said of the end of the world in Matthew 24:36: "“But of that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, but My Father only." Only the Father can know how much glory He possesses. This is not to diminish the power of Jesus. In the end, as shown in the book of Revelation, once the Father becomes fully glorified, Jesus also is glorified by the church and becomes more like the Father. Prior to this future event, you have to keep in mind that there is only one God. Allow me to give you what I have said to others on this topic so you can consider it thoroughly and pray on it. You can always ask me more questions also. Here you go:
When you look at the concept of a trinity, that is, three parts of God, there are a few things in the bible that could lead one to take the position of a trinity, but the evidence is overwhelming that there is only one God, and that He is the Father. The issue is a sensitive one, because it requires someone to state that Jesus is not God, and that bothers most Christians.
God is the only one who is eternal backward and forward in time. God preceded creation, He transcends time, and He made all things. Supporters of the trinity point to John 1:2-3, which says of Jesus: "He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made." This is quoted to prove that Jesus is God, but actually shows that Jesus was present at the beginning of creation, but not before the beginning. John says, "all things were made through him," but things were not made by him. Jesus is the light of life, and God made things by sending glory through Jesus, but Jesus is not the creator. Jesus made nothing by himself. Jesus was given great power by the Father, but Jesus is not God.
In Revelation 3:14, Jesus says: “These things says the Amen, the Faithful and True Witness, the Beginning of the creation of God,” showing again that Jesus was present at the beginning of creation but with no mention of his presence prior to creation. John 17:5 says: "And now, O Father, glorify Me together with Yourself, with the glory which I had with You before the world was." This again points to Jesus being the path for the glory of the Father to build creation, and being present at the moment of creation, but not being present before creation. There was time before creation, and only the Father existed in that time. There was only one who preceded time, as in Isaiah 43:10: “Before Me there was no God formed, Nor shall there be after Me,”
Another indicator that God stands alone as the power behind creation is in Revelation 4:11: “You are worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honor and power; For You created all things.” That’s all things, including Jesus.
Only God can offer eternal salvation, because only God created salvation as a way to earn back His stolen kingdom. Isaiah said in Isaiah 43:11: “I, even I, am the Lord, And besides Me there is no savior.” The Father made the son eternal into the future, as he will make us eternal when salvation is fulfilled and the eternal kingdom returns, but only the Father is eternal both in the past and into the future.
Regarding the holy spirit, I believe it’s a power of the Father, but not a separate being. One problem with the holy spirit is that Jesus used the pronoun “he” for it, so that leads people to believe it is a part of God: “And I will pray the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He may abide with you forever- the Spirit of truth.” (John 14:16-17) However, all angels are referred to as male in the bible, and angles are made up purely of spiritual power, so I think this again leads to the holy spirit being a power available to God.
Finally, to say that Jesus is not God does not diminish the position of Jesus. Jesus is the son of God. The messiah. The anointed one. The only one through whom we can reach the Father. Without the sacrifice of Jesus, we would not enjoy the ability to access the kingdom by repentance and baptism. However, Jesus never said to worship him, and to the contrary, he said to worship God, as in Matthew 6:6: "when you pray, go into your room, and when you have shut your door, pray to your Father who is in the secret place; and your Father who sees in secret will reward you openly."
So none of the Apostles can’t be trusted correct?
Jeff Davis, I never said that. You did. You have obviously fallen for the false prophet, false apostle, and serial killer, Saul of Tarsus. You also obviously did not listen to my presentation, so there is no value in entering a dialogue with you.
Jeff Davis: Here are some questions you can ask yourself about your serial killer, Paul.
Paul says in 1 Timothy 2:12: "I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man, but to be in silence." Also Paul said in 1 Corinthians 14: 34: "Let your women keep silent in the churches, for they are not permitted to speak; but they are to be submissive, as the law also says."
The law never ordered women to be silent in church, and Jesus never said women should not speak up in the faith, so is Paul lying to keep women from serving God?
If you are a woman do you shut up and keep your Christian opinions to yourself? This would mean that women can’t even teach Sunday school. If you are a man do you require Christian women to keep quiet about God and not teach you anything in any manner? You should if you believe in Paul.
2 John 1:1 refers to a woman as in the elect: “To the elect lady and her children, whom I love in truth, and not only I, but also all those who have known the truth.” John accepts a women as in God’s elect. So who is lying, Paul or John?
Paul said in Ephesians 2:8-9 For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, 9 not of works, lest anyone should boast.” Jesus never mentioned the word “grace” one time and Jesus taught that salvation is earned by works. Jesus use the word “works” when describing salvation over fifty times. Who is telling the truth? Jesus or Paul?
Revelation 20:12 says: “And I saw the dead, small and great, standing before God, and books were opened. And another book was opened, which is the Book of Life. And the dead were judged according to their works, by the things which were written in the books.” So is it Paul’s grace or Jesus’ works?
James, the brother of Jesus, said in James 2:24: "You see then that a man is justified by works, and not by faith only," and Paul says we are justified by grace through faith. Who is telling the truth?
What type of character does Paul have? In Acts 7:58, Paul is introduced to the bible story while supervising the public murder of the disciple, Stephen. In Acts 9:1 Paul is “breathing threats and murder against the disciples of the lord.” In Acts 22: 4, Paul admits he is a serial killer of both men and women: “I persecuted the followers of this way to their death, arresting both men and women, and throwing them into prison. In Acts 26:10 Paul says: “When they were put to death, I cast my vote against them.” Do you believe God would choose such an evil person?
Paul admits he is a liar. Paul said he lied to spread the gospel in Romans 3:7: “ For if the truth of God has increased through my lie to His glory, why am I also still judged as a sinner?” Do God or Jesus allow us to lie to spread the gospel? Do you lie to spread the gospel?
Paul lied about his supposed, miracle conversion. Paul told his conversion story three times in three different ways, in Acts 9, Acts 22 and Acts 26. Which story is correct and which did Paul lie about?
Peter said in Acts 15:7 that he was sent by Jesus to bring the gospel to the Gentiles. Paul said in Acts 22:21 that he was sent by Jesus to bring the gospel to the Gentiles. Who is telling the truth?
Jesus says in Revelation 2:2 to the church at Ephesus: "I know your works, your labor, your patience, and that you cannot bear those who are evil. And you have tested those who say they are apostles and are not, and have found them liars;" This church Jesus is speaking to is the church to whom Paul wrote that we are saved by grace and not by works, even though Jesus praised their works, so which lying apostle is Jesus speaking of? Do you think Paul is this liar Jesus speaks of?
Jude, another brother of Jesus, said in Jude 1:4: " For certain men have crept in unnoticed, who long ago were marked out for this condemnation, ungodly men, who turn the grace of our God into lewdness and deny the only Lord God and our Lord Jesus Christ." Which person who changed the meaning of grace from its prior use do you think Jude was talking about?
Jesus said the last thing that had to happen before the end time comes is: "And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in all the world as a witness to all the nations, and then the end will come." Paul said in 2 Thessalonians 2:3 that the last thing that had to happen before the end times comes is "Let no one deceive you by any means; for that Day will not come unless the falling away comes first, and the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition." Who is telling the truth, Paul or Jesus?
And who is this man of perdition? Jesus named a man of perdition in John 17:12 when he spoke to the Father about the apostles: “While I was with them in the world, I kept them in Your name. Those whom You gave Me I have kept; and none of them is lost except the son of perdition, that the Scripture might be fulfilled.” Jesus says that Judas Iscariot is the man of perdition. Who is telling the truth? Jesus or Paul?
Related to the preceding question, Jesus said, “the gospel of the kingdom,” and not the gospel of grace, so which gospel will commence the end times and bring Jesus back?
All of the apostles chosen by Jesus were with him from the baptism of John until the ascension, and when Judas was replaced with Matthias, the same rules were used by the real apostles. Paul had none of these qualifications. How can Paul then call himself an apostle?
Jesus promised the real apostles a reward in heaven in Matthew 19:28: "Assuredly I say to you, that in the regeneration, when the Son of Man sits on the throne of His glory, you who have followed Me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel." In Revelation, the real apostles are shown receiving a reward in the new kingdom. Paul is not shown as receiving a reward in the new kingdom. If Paul was chosen directly by Jesus to bring a new method of salvation and lead the entire church, why isn't Paul given a reward in heaven?
In Matthew 23:9, Jesus said: "Do not call anyone on earth your father; for One is your Father, He who is in heaven." In 1 Corinthians 4:15, Paul said: "For though you might have ten thousand instructors in Christ, yet you do not have many fathers; for in Christ Jesus I have begotten you through the gospel." Is it OK that Paul disobeyed this command of Jesus?
Jesus confirmed all of the ten commandments were required for salvation when he was teaching, except possibly Sabbath keeping. In 2 Corinthians 3:7 Paul called the ten commandments: "the ministry of death, written and engraved on stones." Why did Paul deny God's original laws?
WOMEN HEAD COVERINGS:
1 Corinthians chapter 11:4-15
4 Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head.
+++HAVING LONG HAIR+++
5 But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.
+++ HAVING SHORT HAIR +++
6 For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.
+++ HAVING LONG HAIR +++ a woman who prayed or prophesied with her head uncovered it was the equivalent to her head being shaven.+++
7 For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and esteem of Yahweh: but the woman is the esteem of the man.
+++ HAVE LONG HAIR +++
8 For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man.
9 Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.
10 For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the Messengers.
+++ MEN WERE TRYING TO USURP AUTHORITY OVER THE WOMAN +++
11 Nevertheless neither is the man without the woman, neither the woman without the man, in Yahweh.
12 For as the woman is of the man, even so is the man also by the woman; but all things of Yahweh.
13 Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto YAHWEH uncovered?
+++ WITH SHORT HAIR +++
14 Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, IF A MAN HAVE LONG HAIR, IT IS A SHAME TO HIM?
15 But if a woman have long hair, it is a esteem to her: FOR HER HAIR IS GIVEN HER FOR A COVERING.
+++ THIS VERSE 15 SAYS IT ALL +++
16 But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the assemblies of Yahweh.
BECAUSE THEY BELIEVED WOMEN SHOULD HAVE A HEAD COVERING TO WEAR. This was and is a man-made belief.
Let your women keep silent in the assemblies for they have no permission to teach, but to be in subjection.
1 Corinthians 14
6. Now, brethren, if I come unto you speaking with tongues, what shall I profit you, except I shall speak to you either by revelation, or by knowledge, or by PROPHECYING, or by doctrine?
1 Corinthians 11:6 For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.
+++ HAVING LONG HAIR +++ a woman who prayed or PROPHESIED with her head uncovered it was the equivalent to her head being shaven.+++
1 Corinthians 14:23 If therefore the whole assembly be come together into one place, and all speak with tongues, and there come in those that are unlearned, or unbelievers, will they not say that ye are mad?
Scriptures prove you must have Yahweh’s Spirit infilling to be His. Men and Women alike. They all had the gifts of the Spirit, Men and Women. They did what the Spirit had them to do, Men and Women. They took the Word to the world doing miracles and healings with Yahweh working with them, male and female alike.
1 Corinthians 14:34-40
34. Let your women keep silence in the ASSEMBLIES: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law.
35. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the assembly.
36. WHAT? came the word of Yahweh out from you? or came it unto you only?
Gary Stanfield, I just received this comment. TH-cam does not always alert me of all comments in a timely manner. Thank you for the significant amount of work it took to put together this long string of Paul's contradictions on this topic. That's an interesting point you make that true believers were possibly being set up to be poisoned. It's possible.
In Rev 2:2, Jesus must have been speaking of Paul as false apostle because Paul admits all Asia has left him. Church of Ephesians was Asia yes? Regarding Fathers... this concept was of course adopted by RCC, and probably why Paul is crucial to their doctrines of Constantine. The sabbath is counted... why would you think otherwise? Careful, dont use the same straw-man Paul uses lol.
One thing bothers me though; you said to study GODS WORD at the end... but how could it be if Paul is a false apostle. We cant believe him right?
Mikey Strikey, thank you for your continuing comments. I agree with your analysis that in Rev 2:2 Jesus is speaking directly about Paul, and that Paul's admission that the churches in Asia have left him confirms it. Also, if you look at what Jesus says to each of the churches in chapters two and three of Revelation, they all point to Paul as false. Revelation as a book is a complete repudiation of Paul. Each admonition Jesus gives to the seven churches starts with "I know your works," which destroys Paul's lie of Ephesians 2:8-9 that we are saved by grace through faith and not by works.
Regarding the Sabbath, after being corrected on this topic by several knowledgable believers, including you, I have stopped waffling and now I fully believe and practice that God still requires us to observe the Sabbath, but not in the Old Testament way. Now we observe Sabbath how Jesus observed it.
Finally, regarding my request for all believers to study God's word, Paul is not God's word. The writings attributed to Saul of Tarsus are insertions by the Satanists to deny God's plan of eternal salvation. The Satanists use the method of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil by taking the truth and then offsetting and overcoming that truth with lies. You see this method in every aspect of daily life on the earth. Thanks again.
@@hughwhitmore-author2031 Well thank you Hugh... thats a relief to hear about the Sabbath. "My sheep hear my voice" and you just showed proof you are such. Congratulations and welcome to the fold. Your work here is awesome and I so much enjoy your videos. I agree totally about your version of Gods word... trouble is, 2 billion Christians believe ALL the Bible is Gods word, and so the point I try to make was that while Pauls apostasy remains in the bible... we really cannot regard it as all "Gods Word". Sure you and me and a few others can now discern and separate the WORD from the LIES, but others cannot. I know I am getting technical here, but the truth is, Christians in general will see you being hypocritical, if you speak against Paul, and yet at the same time call it Gods word,. Get my point friend? You know the kind; the simple minded who really love Paul and relegate Jesus to the rear suggesting Jesus is not our teacher but Paul is. It is these who need to know that Gods word is only what Jesus say... not Paul. You are doing Jesus a great service mate... all the best in your journey of truth. Love you brother. Like Jesus said... it is those who do the will of my father who are my brother sister and mother. Amen.
One question... how do you keep your office so darn clean and tidy man?
@Mikey Strikey, I'm glad to be back in the fold on the Sabbath, so thanks for being a part of what brought me back. It wasn't that I was against the Sabbath, I was just trying to figure out what Jesus meant. As you say, Jesus is our teacher, but he's also our protector. Its Jesus who leads us to the truth. Thank you for your kindness. I feel the same way. The fellowship of those few of us who possess the whole truth of the Father is very rewarding. Regarding my neat office, my habit is that area of life is a bit over the top. I am fastidious to a fault, so if you come to stay with me sometime, which would be nice, you better make your bed each day. Hope to hear from you soon.
@@hughwhitmore-author2031 Hahaha... love your humour about the office mate. Will check out more of your videos in the future as time permits, so no doubt there will be some questions along the way. Take care. Peace and love from Oz.
🧐
Richard Fairweather, I have no idea what you are indicating. Emojis are no replacement for the articulation of ideas.
For God’s sake, don’t give up your day job, whatever that may be🧐
"The Son of Man will send his angels and they will gather out of his kingdom all causes of sin and all law-breakers and throw them into the fiery furnace. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth." Matthew 13:41-42
I hope you repent Richard. Paul is a very very dangerous man.
@@ChristinaFromTH-cam Jesus I know, Paul I know but who are you?🧐
@@richardfairweather2312 are you a demon possessed man? Is that why you're quoting the demon that attacked the 7 Sons of Sceva when "the Jesus Paul proclaims" had no effect over him?!