Hello,that's how life is supposed to be....helping each other and make a great day of it!! Wonderful images and wish you all the best in life....Greetings from the Netherlands😊😊
Hi Scott, Your Wildlife videos really inspire me to get out with my camera, i've even purchased a Nikon 180-600mm Lens after watching your reviews on it. Stay safe and keep well. Best Wishes from UK
Hi Scott i am glad you able to carry on with you passion me and Dave in our wetland centre in south wales always talk about your videos when we meet every Friday Dave has purchased the 200-800 " loves it " but looks forward videos regarding this lens good or bad "glad to see you back" glenn
Big shout out to Cassie, not just for helping you but her photojournalistic capabilities, as well as her photos and being pretty never hurts. You are correct do not go out alone, that would be a fools errand and may not end as intended. Keep up the great work. Take care of yourself.
Hey Scott! Great to see you out in your happy place, some superb video footage and photos as well, like Cassie you need to be patient as well I suspect, small steps my friend, stay safe and take care 👍📷🦅 Terry
Super glad to see you out shooting!!!!! Thanks as usual for the showing us what lenses can do for us. Keep getting better and will catch you in the next one.
Great to see you out again. And thank you for putting the distance to the subject. I've often thought I have something wrong in settings or the camera is just not getting the focus right. Now I understand the results I get are typical for the distances.
Very much so about distance. I plan to do a video about teleconverters and distance to subject is a HUGE factor. Anything past 50 or 75 years depending on size of subject will denote if you get any detail in the subject.
Hi Scott great to see you back in action, you don’t seem to have lost your photo “nouse”. Enjoyed the shots. Glad you can get out with Cassie and anyone else to do some photography hope that raises your spirits to keep you going. All the best S
Nice images. Good to see you out and on your belly getting it done. :) I have had wonderful experiences with the 180 -600. I am truly surprised at the AF speed and VR with my Z9. It has become my go-to wildlife lens.
Love this one! Awesome that you have such a good friend! I’ve never been to Alaska, it just looks amazing. Thanks for sharing the scenery. I appreciate your reviews and love your teaching style. Thanks for sharing your adventures!
Really great footage/photographs by you. You certainly are very skilled wildlife photographers. Also very interesting to see the distances to your birds. Your yards-to-meter conversion needs a little focus, but it’s very good information to us the wannabes. Thanks for sharing your outdoor experience. /Per, Denmark.
Thanks Scott,I shoot these sooty oyster catchers in Sydney Australia there an interesting bird,most of us will never meet but it feels like a big family,stay well,cheers.
Scott, it’s so wonderful to see you outside in nature where your soul is so happy! What a beautiful location! I love the low camera angle views of the Black oystercatchers! Both of the lens-camera combinations you used produced fine images! I would imagine the Canon R7 and 200-800 combination was a lot lighter to carry in the field, even if the ergonomics of holding the camera were not as good as the Nikon Z9. I would really like to see a Canon R7 II with much more of a professional body, improved sensor resolution, subject recognition, AF speed, tracking, and accuracy, and a much larger buffer! A CF Express Type B card would also be a great addition! I would also like to see Nikon make a true mirrorless successor to the highly acclaimed D500!
Thanks Vaughn. The r7 combo was almost same weight as I had the 1.4 tc on it, but it was a touch lighter. Yeah be nice to see those things in the next r7. probably couple years out on that camera though
Great to see you out again. Take care, step by step, day by day. If have some sharpness issues (photo) with the R200-800 at my R7 (when too much sun, it seems). Still figuring out. Who's Catty, with you... ? :)
Beautiful shots!! the 200-800mm was on my bucket list but recent events destroyed my project on saving for it,I crossed it off the list as I won't recover financially ,retirement is coming so I gotta be careful with my pennies.
Nice to see you’re able to get out again 👍 In the UK the Canon 200-800 is non existent, local camera store saying may not be available at all this year 🙁
The kens is VERY rare right now. Stewarts Photo here in Anchorage has so far only gotten 1 copy and that's the one I have. Hopefully Canon will get more of them out soon.
Awesome footage Scott ! I mostly loved the duo opening their mouth like a mirror at 4:20 🤩 Before that shot, all other Nikon images were @560 mm and also several Canon shots were @900 mm. Do you shoot on purpose a little shorter than the maximum focal length because of sharpness ?? or was it mainly because of the composition ? So far, I didn't yet pop a 1.4x between my R5 and the 200-800. Doing that on the R7 yields you nearly 3x the reach (although you don't factor in the crop ration in the focal length info, and I do get why) of how you were using the Nikon combo. I'm amazed that on youtube and after your processing, these R7 images are nearly the same IQ as your Z9. I bet in full resolution you'll notice the difference ;-) Good to see you're able to get really low again. Take it step by step, but I'm sure being out with our feathered friends gives you the extra energy to recover man !
Any chance you can do a vs between the AFS 180-400 f4 and the Z mount 400 f.4.5? That would be awesome. I'm wondering how the olde 180-400 f4 would do with the Z8? It's supposed to have excellent optics and has the built in 1.4 TC. Thank you!!
@@WILDALASKA No problem my friend! Just thought that would make a really interesting video since they both seems to have great optics. Maybe even included the 100-400 S lens too in the comparison. Anyways, thanks for all your amazing content you bring to us!! Super cool stuff!
I was wondering you have considered doing a video on Nikon’s new 28-400 mm z lens on a Z8. Is it a wildlife lens or just a gimmick? The light weight has some advantages, but the lens has a lot of disadvantages.
That's an interesting lens. I think they priced it too high for the folks that would be interested in. If I can get a copy of it, I will test it out and see.
@@WILDALASKA Hope you can. I am interested in it. My 180-600 on my Z9 comes in at eight pounds. Too much for my 78-year-old querpo to hike around with for any distance.
If you had a budget of $4500 USD for a body and lens setup what would you chose? I only shoot wildlife still and video. I am leaning towards Sony A7iv and 200-600mm, but I see nothing comparable with Canon. The canon R6mii and RF 200-800mm is decent but you can't buy one currently as the lens is on backorder.Any advice?
Invest in the Glass. Get the best lens you can get and the bodies are all great in the mirrorless world for subject detection. End goal is to work up to a 400 f/2.8, 500/600 f/4, but that gets you into the $5k+ range in the used market. The separation, low light capability, colors etc are much superior to all the other glass. The front glass crystals take 18 months to grow alone, hence the big price tags. The best for wildlife as of current date is the Z8 and the Z 180-600 in the price range you are kicking around. This hits at $5.2K though, but it is the king as of today from everything I have tested used.
One of your best vids to date. I have to say, the Nikon photos look sharper on my screen. Did you have back surgery or ??? Whatever take care & hope you are feeling better.
No surgery so far. Both lenses are very sharp. Just had really different light conditions from the oystercatchers vs the small birds. plus I had the 1.4 TC on the 200-800 lens. During the oystercatchers we had full light cloud cover which is the best lighting conditions for not shadows etc. The small birds the sun was peeking out and tossing some mid day harsh light out.
Which lens/setup do you prefer? I'm still on the fence with the 200-800mm (haven't shot it yet). I have an R5 with 100-500mm which I love. I plan to get the R5II unless they don't update enough. I have also recently been using a Nikon ZF + 200-600mm with plans to try out the Z8. The stabilization for video seems far better on Nikon than Canon (or Sony). Plus the lack of external zoom and shorter throw seem nice on the Nikon 180-600mm although I haven't yet used the 200-800mm.
@@bladerealm124 200-800 I prefer over the 100-500. that 600-800 range and DoF is fun. Now the z8 and the 180-600 is very very good combo. I love the sensor on the z8/z9
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 89 | คู่เอก "ยอดไอคิว vs คิริลล์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Z3vYkHJ_5Ig/mqdefault.jpg)
Hello,that's how life is supposed to be....helping each other and make a great day of it!! Wonderful images and wish you all the best in life....Greetings from the Netherlands😊😊
Yes, thank you
It's great to see you doing what makes you happy and feel most alive.
thx
Hi Scott, Your Wildlife videos really inspire me to get out with my camera, i've even purchased a Nikon 180-600mm Lens after watching your reviews on it. Stay safe and keep well. Best Wishes from UK
Great to hear!
Hi Scott i am glad you able to carry on with you passion me and Dave in our wetland centre in south wales always talk about your videos when we
meet every Friday Dave has purchased the 200-800 " loves it " but looks forward videos regarding this lens good or bad "glad to see you back" glenn
Thanks 👍
This video makes me more than happy one of my favourite birds and photographers back running his shutter.
thanks
Great videos and photos, but above all it is fantastic to see you are out there and recovering well =)
Thank you very much!
Great to see you out and about again. Thank you for sharing!
thx
Great to see you out, Man! Love those Black Oystercatchers!
They are special
Big shout out to Cassie, not just for helping you but her photojournalistic capabilities, as well as her photos and being pretty never hurts. You are correct do not go out alone, that would be a fools errand and may not end as intended. Keep up the great work. Take care of yourself.
👍
Done Well Wild Alaska! Huge shoutout to Cassie.
So great to see you back out and about! : )
Thank you!
Hey Scott! Great to see you out in your happy place, some superb video footage and photos as well, like Cassie you need to be patient as well I suspect, small steps my friend, stay safe and take care 👍📷🦅 Terry
Thanks
Wonderful to see you back out there Scott and thanks to Cassie. Film footage of those Oystercatchers was magic. Take care 🇬🇧🇦🇺
thx
Great job, good to see you out and thanks to Cassie for looking out for you.
👍
Super glad to see you out shooting!!!!! Thanks as usual for the showing us what lenses can do for us. Keep getting better and will catch you in the next one.
👍
Me alegra ver nuevamente un video tuyo, seguro te ayudan esas cortas salidas acompañado a recuperarte 😃
thanks. Very much so
Always good to see you out and about brother. And thank you Cassie for being there for him.
👍
Damn. Absolutely fantastic video of Cassie and you together. Brought tears to my eyes. Take it easy though.
👍
Wow Scott, what a comeback! A fantastic wildlife video production... you are The Master! A big thanks to Cassie!
thanks
Thanks for the video. Please take good care of yourselves.
Thank you, I will
Good to see you back at it! Take care..
Thanks 👍
Great to see you out again. And thank you for putting the distance to the subject. I've often thought I have something wrong in settings or the camera is just not getting the focus right. Now I understand the results I get are typical for the distances.
Very much so about distance. I plan to do a video about teleconverters and distance to subject is a HUGE factor. Anything past 50 or 75 years depending on size of subject will denote if you get any detail in the subject.
Glad to see you out in the wild again!
👍
What a fabulous video. Thanks so much for bringing it to us, Scott. Really great to see you going out more often now and doing what you love.
Glad you enjoyed it
Hi Scott great to see you back in action, you don’t seem to have lost your photo “nouse”. Enjoyed the shots. Glad you can get out with Cassie and anyone else to do some photography hope that raises your spirits to keep you going. All the best S
Thanks 👍
Great video. Glad to see you doing what you love to do the most. The eyes on those BOCs are amazing.
They are one of my favorite birds. Expect to see more of them in the next few videos lol
Awesome so lovely capture
thx
Thumbs up, thanks for sharing, and good to see you out and about !!!!!
Thanks 👍
Nice images. Good to see you out and on your belly getting it done. :) I have had wonderful experiences with the 180 -600. I am truly surprised at the AF speed and VR with my Z9. It has become my go-to wildlife lens.
It's a great combo. I use it a lot filming wildlife
Hi Cassie! Awesome vid, and wow you have so much snow still!
It's leaving pretty fast but ya we got a lot this year. Ping me if you get around Anchorage. I may be over in Kodiak in Sept.
So glad to see you out running the shutter. Just take it easy I had heart surgery back in January 2020 it takes a while
Thanks. Its a journey lol
Love this one! Awesome that you have such a good friend! I’ve never been to Alaska, it just looks amazing. Thanks for sharing the scenery. I appreciate your reviews and love your teaching style. Thanks for sharing your adventures!
Thanks for watching!
Good to see you brother 🙏🙏
thx
How wonderful 😊thank you so much.
Glad you enjoyed it!
Enjoyed your video, and like everyone else, good to see you out. Take care!
Thanks 👍
Great video!!b It is good to see you out and about!
Thank you!
Great Job, loved it, duke from Philly
thanks
Really great footage/photographs by you. You certainly are very skilled wildlife photographers. Also very interesting to see the distances to your birds. Your yards-to-meter conversion needs a little focus, but it’s very good information to us the wannabes. Thanks for sharing your outdoor experience. /Per, Denmark.
Glad you enjoyed it
Thanks Scott,I shoot these sooty oyster catchers in Sydney Australia there an interesting bird,most of us will never meet but it feels like a big family,stay well,cheers.
very cool
Nice to see you up and about
Thanks
Great to see you out and about again, Scott. Beautiful video. Thanks for joining, Cassie. I gave you a follow on IG.
Thanks for following Cassie. She's a great photographer.
Scott, it’s so wonderful to see you outside in nature where your soul is so happy! What a beautiful location! I love the low camera angle views of the Black oystercatchers! Both of the lens-camera combinations you used produced fine images! I would imagine the Canon R7 and 200-800 combination was a lot lighter to carry in the field, even if the ergonomics of holding the camera were not as good as the Nikon Z9.
I would really like to see a Canon R7 II with much more of a professional body, improved sensor resolution, subject recognition, AF speed, tracking, and accuracy, and a much larger buffer! A CF Express Type B card would also be a great addition! I would also like to see Nikon make a true mirrorless successor to the highly acclaimed D500!
Thanks Vaughn. The r7 combo was almost same weight as I had the 1.4 tc on it, but it was a touch lighter. Yeah be nice to see those things in the next r7. probably couple years out on that camera though
Excellent video and great photos 👏good to see you out and about doing wildlife photography 👍📸
Thanks 👍
Great to see you out take care
thanks
Great to see you out again. Take care, step by step, day by day. If have some sharpness issues (photo) with the R200-800 at my R7 (when too much sun, it seems). Still figuring out. Who's Catty, with you... ? :)
Cassie is one of my photography buddies I shoot with a lot. I haven't had any swipes with the 200-800 myself.
Great to see you able to get out. Love your videos. Do you mean the 180-600 lens? Hope your recovery continues well for you.
Thank you!
Beautiful shots!! the 200-800mm was on my bucket list but recent events destroyed my project on saving for it,I crossed it off the list as I won't recover financially ,retirement is coming so I gotta be careful with my pennies.
👍
Nice to see you’re able to get out again 👍
In the UK the Canon 200-800 is non existent, local camera store saying may not be available at all this year 🙁
The kens is VERY rare right now. Stewarts Photo here in Anchorage has so far only gotten 1 copy and that's the one I have. Hopefully Canon will get more of them out soon.
❤
👍
Awesome footage Scott ! I mostly loved the duo opening their mouth like a mirror at 4:20 🤩
Before that shot, all other Nikon images were @560 mm and also several Canon shots were @900 mm. Do you shoot on purpose a little shorter than the maximum focal length because of sharpness ?? or was it mainly because of the composition ?
So far, I didn't yet pop a 1.4x between my R5 and the 200-800. Doing that on the R7 yields you nearly 3x the reach (although you don't factor in the crop ration in the focal length info, and I do get why) of how you were using the Nikon combo. I'm amazed that on youtube and after your processing, these R7 images are nearly the same IQ as your Z9. I bet in full resolution you'll notice the difference ;-)
Good to see you're able to get really low again. Take it step by step, but I'm sure being out with our feathered friends gives you the extra energy to recover man !
Just comp really.
Any chance you can do a vs between the AFS 180-400 f4 and the Z mount 400 f.4.5? That would be awesome. I'm wondering how the olde 180-400 f4 would do with the Z8? It's supposed to have excellent optics and has the built in 1.4 TC. Thank you!!
If I can get hold of the lens, but it's doubtful. Pretty hard one to get a hold of to test out.
@@WILDALASKA No problem my friend! Just thought that would make a really interesting video since they both seems to have great optics. Maybe even included the 100-400 S lens too in the comparison.
Anyways, thanks for all your amazing content you bring to us!! Super cool stuff!
Welcome back!
Do you think the 200-800 is as sharp as the 100-500?
yes
Hope you're doing much better
thx
I was wondering you have considered doing a video on Nikon’s new 28-400 mm z lens on a Z8. Is it a wildlife lens or just a gimmick? The light weight has some advantages, but the lens has a lot of disadvantages.
That's an interesting lens. I think they priced it too high for the folks that would be interested in. If I can get a copy of it, I will test it out and see.
@@WILDALASKA Hope you can. I am interested in it. My 180-600 on my Z9 comes in at eight pounds. Too much for my 78-year-old querpo to hike around with for any distance.
If you had a budget of $4500 USD for a body and lens setup what would you chose? I only shoot wildlife still and video. I am leaning towards Sony A7iv and 200-600mm, but I see nothing comparable with Canon. The canon R6mii and RF 200-800mm is decent but you can't buy one currently as the lens is on backorder.Any advice?
Invest in the Glass. Get the best lens you can get and the bodies are all great in the mirrorless world for subject detection. End goal is to work up to a 400 f/2.8, 500/600 f/4, but that gets you into the $5k+ range in the used market. The separation, low light capability, colors etc are much superior to all the other glass. The front glass crystals take 18 months to grow alone, hence the big price tags.
The best for wildlife as of current date is the Z8 and the Z 180-600 in the price range you are kicking around. This hits at $5.2K though, but it is the king as of today from everything I have tested used.
@@WILDALASKAI appreciate you my friend, and I hope you are feeling well.
One of your best vids to date. I have to say, the Nikon photos look sharper on my screen. Did you have back surgery or ??? Whatever take care & hope you are feeling better.
No surgery so far. Both lenses are very sharp. Just had really different light conditions from the oystercatchers vs the small birds. plus I had the 1.4 TC on the 200-800 lens. During the oystercatchers we had full light cloud cover which is the best lighting conditions for not shadows etc. The small birds the sun was peeking out and tossing some mid day harsh light out.
Which lens/setup do you prefer? I'm still on the fence with the 200-800mm (haven't shot it yet). I have an R5 with 100-500mm which I love. I plan to get the R5II unless they don't update enough. I have also recently been using a Nikon ZF + 200-600mm with plans to try out the Z8. The stabilization for video seems far better on Nikon than Canon (or Sony). Plus the lack of external zoom and shorter throw seem nice on the Nikon 180-600mm although I haven't yet used the 200-800mm.
@@bladerealm124 200-800 I prefer over the 100-500. that 600-800 range and DoF is fun. Now the z8 and the 180-600 is very very good combo. I love the sensor on the z8/z9
@@WILDALASKA how is the 180-600mm + 1.4x vs 200-800mm bare? If you could only own one combo which would it be?
@@bladerealm124 I have a video on the 180-600 with the TC. like the 180-600 better just due to its design