Long-Term Compounding w/ Chris Mayer | Constellation Software, Topicus, & Lumine (TIP608)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 60

  • @WeStudyBillionaires
    @WeStudyBillionaires  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    📌 Check out this video next: th-cam.com/video/gPJ78EQSsOg/w-d-xo.html
    ⚠ IMPORTANT: Please beware of cyber scams and phishing attacks. We will never ask for your contact info in the comments section. Kindly report suspicious accounts you see below. Thank you!

  • @greg7811
    @greg7811 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Chris just seems like he's totally content on sharing just about anything, doesn't want or need your business, but does want to help you. Family office guys are my favorite.

    • @WeStudyBillionaires
      @WeStudyBillionaires  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We agree, he's incredible! Thanks so much for watching. 🙌

  • @investclubbg
    @investclubbg 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Chris is a Genius as per usual

  • @gmgabrielmoura
    @gmgabrielmoura 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    When Chris appears, we watch.

  • @FoodForestBrad
    @FoodForestBrad 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Attention is a scarce resource, focus it wisely. Great advice!

  • @Hawking1969
    @Hawking1969 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Mid-50s here....I've never sold a stock or ETF. Served me well.

    • @WeStudyBillionaires
      @WeStudyBillionaires  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks so much for sharing your experience. Best of luck to you! 🙌

    • @brianbirnbaum9760
      @brianbirnbaum9760 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Wow so even something that’s down a lot?

    • @Hawking1969
      @Hawking1969 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@brianbirnbaum9760 yes....some are down 70%

    • @lisbethsalander1723
      @lisbethsalander1723 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for sharing. Gives us courage to hold on. How long have you been investing?

    • @Hawking1969
      @Hawking1969 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lisbethsalander1723 20 years

  • @ElLotdog
    @ElLotdog 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Constellation is starting to feel a lot like Liberty Media, one of the great compounders of the last 50 years

  • @WilliamBrown-e3t
    @WilliamBrown-e3t 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great interview and investor. Please bring back Chris again and perhaps talk about his other holdings. Can you do a timestamp please? I've listened to this interview all through but sometimes don't have the time to listen to all your podcasts. Being able to focus in on a particular section of the interview about a specific stock or viewpoint would make it much more accessible.

  • @davidwilson9976
    @davidwilson9976 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Hold onto your winners and trim your losers.

    • @WeStudyBillionaires
      @WeStudyBillionaires  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Preach! 💰

    • @jonl9192
      @jonl9192 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Losers should only be defined by fundamentals not stock price

  • @MrMowww1
    @MrMowww1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Another home run podcast and I own all three of Mark Leonards companies! I also learn a lot from these podcasts!

    • @WeStudyBillionaires
      @WeStudyBillionaires  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Awesome! Thanks so much for the support! 🙏

  • @ElLotdog
    @ElLotdog 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great interview! Thanks Chris!!!

  • @InvestingWithAdamK
    @InvestingWithAdamK 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great interview and couldn’t agree more. I try to stick to under 30 stocks in my portfolio and believe in buy and own. Unless something fundamentally changes in the companies i choose I expect and hope to own then for 20 years. I also do not rebalance if something starts running. If something becomes more than 25% of my total wealth then I’ll consider rebalancing a bit.

  • @personalfinance2000
    @personalfinance2000 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Anyone know which friend released the 300 page serial acquirer manual?? Did he say RAQ or REQ capital??

    • @JPX-7
      @JPX-7 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It was REQ Capital

  • @silentnature977
    @silentnature977 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you very much for creating and uploading this video!

  • @every_day_dad_1550
    @every_day_dad_1550 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think people hear and see chris Mayer and immediately hear and expect 100x because of his book. I'd be more than happy with some 10xs , a couple 5xs, the odd 15x and 20x. Anything more is just gravy. Yes depending on timelines. Ofcourse

    • @earlyretirement1459
      @earlyretirement1459 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The way I think about it is a 15% long term CAGR goal. Or doubling every 5 years. That makes you very rich over time.

  • @Dividendflywheel
    @Dividendflywheel 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Brilliant simply BRILLIANT Interview. I am taking notes.

  • @theenglishpaper3448
    @theenglishpaper3448 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Berkshire should give Chris Mayer 2 billion dollars to manage

  • @faw1998ss
    @faw1998ss 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    really enjoyed this conservation. really like Chris a lot. A question: with all the AI capablity improving, how AI will impact CSU, TOI and Lumeine? I bought many Chris's picks, but I am hesitant here with these three great companies.

    • @Dividendflywheel
      @Dividendflywheel 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A 1% stake in each won’t hurt much😊😊. But if they grow 10x or 20x you’d be in a good place. Best wishes

  • @lunchinvesting
    @lunchinvesting 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That was incredible! Thank you for sharing :)

  • @HepCatJack
    @HepCatJack 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The difficulty is being to differentiate a serial acquirer from what Peter Lynch called a de-worsifier.

    • @Anton-eh6jw
      @Anton-eh6jw 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What did Peter Lynch mean by deworsifier?

    • @HepCatJack
      @HepCatJack 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Anton-eh6jw It was initially used to describe the over-expansion of a company into new growth projects and businesses that they do not fully understand and which do not align with the company’s core competencies. When Sam Zell purchased troubled companies he tried to repackaged them in a way that there was some synergies between them. In the context of portfolio management, “diworsification” refers to the practice of owning an excessive number of stock positions for the sake of diversification. This can lead to suboptimal investment decisions being made which lower the expected return of the portfolio.

    • @HepCatJack
      @HepCatJack 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Anton-eh6jw one fictitious example of a deworsifier would be a conglomerate that owns a sugar factory and one that makes airplane parts. There is no synergy between them. Contrast this with the Ford Motor factory which originally vertically integrated owning mines to supply the iron and coal for the steel it needed. Subdiaries to manufacture the rubber and glass needed for their cars, freighters to bring ores from the mines.

  • @davorsostaric
    @davorsostaric 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for episode

  • @blaquiere141
    @blaquiere141 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for interviewing the very best ! The last people you interviewed where really disappointing, their lists and portfolios where full of trash companies on the way to bankruptcy... I've said it all along : Chris Mayer is the GOAT.

    • @Wrex327
      @Wrex327 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Who do you mean?

  • @NicE-jq3wv
    @NicE-jq3wv 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Agreed…I would never punish my winners for doing well.

  • @bradleyhope3652
    @bradleyhope3652 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Another one

  • @youtubeaccount137
    @youtubeaccount137 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @clay you love copart more than copart

  • @ValueHunt1
    @ValueHunt1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

  • @DM-bn6bf
    @DM-bn6bf 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Topicus seems very expensive, even with my good growth expectations. Book value is expensive, cash flow seems expensive with growth rates. Am I missing something? If someone could explain pls. I understand great companies demand higher multiples, just seems very high

    • @Dr.Dumpnpump
      @Dr.Dumpnpump 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What your missing is what’s priced into their future. Past performance doesn’t equal future results. Just because it’s technically expensive today, doesn’t mean it won’t or can’t grow into that valuation or higher.

    • @brianbirnbaum9760
      @brianbirnbaum9760 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Book value is completely meaningless when analyzing 99% of businesses.

  • @KamilMauel
    @KamilMauel 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Constellation Software S3E27 😏

    • @brianbirnbaum9760
      @brianbirnbaum9760 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah the comments here aren’t helping this channel. This isn’t a good episode. I really like Chris but they provide very little value and entertainment.

  • @piedfpiper6965
    @piedfpiper6965 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    terrible. no value added.

  • @cheesy132
    @cheesy132 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the implication here is he was smart enough never to sell. When will you guys interview the investors who held onto Cisco, Nokia, BlackBerry… and Never sold. He’s just one investor out of thousands who flipped a coin 10 times and kept getting heads.

    • @Dividendflywheel
      @Dividendflywheel 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think he owns about 15 or 20 compounders.

    • @georgepolski9771
      @georgepolski9771 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      😂😂😂 at some point you gotta admit that there's some skill involved