The 2.7% Rule for Retirement Spending

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 พ.ค. 2024
  • Meet with PWL Capital: calendly.com/d/3vm-t2j-h3p
    Is the 4% rule really 2-3%?
    Referenced in this video:
    - Determining Withdrawal Rates Using Historical Data: www.financialplanningassociat...
    - The equity premium: A puzzle: www.sciencedirect.com/science...
    - Is The United States A Lucky Survivor: A Hierarchical Bayesian Approach: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.c...
    - The Safe Withdrawal Rate: Evidence from a Broad Sample of Developed Markets: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.c...
    - Episode 224: Prof. Scott Cederburg: Long-Horizon Losses in Stocks, Bonds, and Bills: rationalreminder.ca/podcast/224
    ------------------
    Follow Ben Felix on
    - Twitter: / benjaminwfelix
    Visit Rational Reminder: rationalreminder.ca/
    Join the Rational Reminder Community: community.rationalreminder.ca/
    Follow the Rational Reminder on:
    - Twitter: / rationalremind
    - Instagram: / rationalreminder
    Visit PWL Capital: www.pwlcapital.com/
    Follow PWL Capital on:
    - Twitter: / pwlcapital
    - LinkedIn: / pwl-capital
    You can find the Rational Reminder podcast on
    Google Podcasts:
    www.google.com/podcasts?feed=...
    Apple Podcasts:
    itunes.apple.com/ca/podcast/t...
    Spotify Podcasts:
    open.spotify.com/show/6RHWTH9...
    ------------------

ความคิดเห็น • 577

  • @EthanMaloney-qp4lh
    @EthanMaloney-qp4lh 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +372

    Retirement is now more difficult than it was in the past. I've been saving for a long time instead of investing, and right now I only have about $400K. considering all the inflation, i'm thinking of investing in stocks, i dont just have idea on market strategieS.

    • @Mckennie61751
      @Mckennie61751 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      At a point like this, when the pressure is already on you to retire, its best recommended you seek the services of an advisor, as this allows you make smarter investing decisions.

    • @WestonScally7614
      @WestonScally7614 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      It's unfortunate most people don't have such information. I don't really blame people who panic. Lack of information can be a big hurdle. I've been making more than $30k passively by just investing through an advisor, and I don't have to do much work. Doesn't matter if the economy is misbehaving; great wealth managers will always make returns.

    • @JordanReam8186
      @JordanReam8186 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      Your advisor appears skilled. How can I contact them? I've recently sold property and aim to invest in stocks, seeking guidance.

    • @WestonScally7614
      @WestonScally7614 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      *Jennifer Leigh Hickman* is the licensed advisor I use. Just search the name. You’d find necessary details to work with to set up an appointment.

    • @louis71350
      @louis71350 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      Thank you for the lead. I searched her up, and I have sent her an email. I hope she gets back to me soon.

  • @jellovendigar
    @jellovendigar ปีที่แล้ว +582

    Thank you Ben for making me fearful of my own longevity risk

    • @DavidYoung81
      @DavidYoung81 ปีที่แล้ว +86

      I'm immediately taking up smoking to reduce that risk!

    • @Omar-et7sb
      @Omar-et7sb ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@DavidYoung81 Same... and edibles.
      Wait, when you said smoking you meant... nevermind. :P

    • @Andrew21882
      @Andrew21882 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@DavidYoung81 McDonald’s would help with that too.

    • @DavidYoung81
      @DavidYoung81 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Andrew21882 Excellent idea, I'll look into that as well! 😜

    • @swaggery
      @swaggery ปีที่แล้ว

      Thankfully in Canada you can get euthanasia easily.

  • @cat-.-
    @cat-.- ปีที่แล้ว +331

    Instead of letting your lifespan, an unknowable, influence your withdraw rate, we might also consider a novel approach where you let your portfolio depletion event inform your end-of-life timing. This eliminates all risks and is a favorable strategy.

    • @NitinPatelIndia
      @NitinPatelIndia ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Love this! 😂

    • @fredatlas4396
      @fredatlas4396 ปีที่แล้ว

      @cat..
      So when you run out of money you just commit suicide!

    • @alansach8437
      @alansach8437 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Yes. Just spend your retirement as you did your life! Make money decisions based on what you have, how much you've been spending and what's coming in.

    • @negativegains4883
      @negativegains4883 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Ah, it appears I have found my GF's yt acc

    • @jakeoswald8017
      @jakeoswald8017 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      Ah, it appears my retirement account has reached $0! Time to end-of-life event

  • @JerryLuca-nm9ru55
    @JerryLuca-nm9ru55 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +159

    For me, I believe retirees who struggle to meet their basic needs are the ones who could not accumulate enough money during their active years to meet their needs. Retirement choices determine a lot of things. My wife and I both spent same number of years in the civil service, she invested through a wealth manager and myself through the 401k. We both still earning after our retirement.........

    • @LarryAnthony-ut8ok44
      @LarryAnthony-ut8ok44 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is true. I'm in my mid 50's now. My wife and I were following this same trajectory. Last two years, I pulled out my money and invested with her wealth manager. Not catching up with her profits over the years, but at least I earn more. I'm making money even before retiring, and my retirement fund has grown way more than it would have with just the 401(k). Haha.

  • @davec3974
    @davec3974 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    But this information makes me angry, so it must be wrong.

  • @Zhenzengjunliao
    @Zhenzengjunliao ปีที่แล้ว +3

    These videos are high quality with many research data supported, which requiring a lot of time to prepare and to produce. It is one of the best learning sources for DIY investors, as the channel names it, Common Sense! Thank you

  • @tubaherogaming631
    @tubaherogaming631 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I just watched my first episode of the Rational Reminder podcast the other day and it made me want to watch several more immediately after. Thanks for putting out all this good TH-cam content!

  • @denisgurbuz4186
    @denisgurbuz4186 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Always perfect content with more references than we can ever want! One of the few channels one can trust nowadays! Thanks so much Ben 👏

  • @mattlm64
    @mattlm64 ปีที่แล้ว +176

    "Wow, you're a millionaire? You are rich!"
    "Yes, I'm off to enjoy my 27k a year"

    • @johnurban7333
      @johnurban7333 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Great family and support system is what makes you rich

    • @coyrex1250
      @coyrex1250 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      For a person who has their kids moved out (if they had them) and house paid off, which I'd hope someone would if they were looking at retiring, that seems pretty doable. Depends on where you live too, and definitely wouldn't be luxurious in most places, but doable in most places I'd assume.

    • @novakd1530
      @novakd1530 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      only for 30 years? don't forget longevity risk!

    • @ukzjwri
      @ukzjwri ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@novakd1530 who cares if longevity comes with senility…

    • @tanzeemali6450
      @tanzeemali6450 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@novakd1530 There is always the option to mitigate that risk...

  • @saladin_r
    @saladin_r ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I listened to your whole rational reminder episode on this topic and really appreciate how you make these videos accessible so I can flip them to people who can't go down the rabbit hole. Am in Ottawa as well and will refer folks to PWL as long as you're there. Keep up the great work

  • @nathanmcguire1449
    @nathanmcguire1449 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Always such great research, references, and unbiased info. Your vidoes are extremely informative and I really enjoy the content! Merry Christmas!!!

  • @thomas6502
    @thomas6502 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you Ben! We appreciate your channel. Happy holidays sir.

  • @yaafl817
    @yaafl817 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ben thank you for the informative video, I'd love to hear more on variable spending rules, I know you mentioned them during past videos but a deep dive would be great

  • @MrJozefP
    @MrJozefP ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Ben, I cannot thank you enough for the value your channel provides. My favorites videos are 'picking stocks' and 'bear markets'. Remind me of how I used not to unserstand the absolute basics :) You most probably saved my retirement, and definitely saved the present me a lot of doubts and time. Greetings from Poland, Merry Christmas!

    • @andreameteau1839
      @andreameteau1839 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Do what everybody else is doing if you are okay with only having what everybody else has.Information that will pay you everyday, you've got to stop saving all your money.
      Venture into investing some, if you really want financial stability.
      Choose to grow and elevate your mind by studying audios, videos, attending conferences that will give you the edge!

  • @elfrey902
    @elfrey902 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That channel is amazing. Best one by far.

  • @livelucky74
    @livelucky74 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How did I just now find out you have a podcast... 200+ episodes for me to catch up on at work. Hell yeah!

  • @PapaCharlie9
    @PapaCharlie9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Easily one of the most important videos on this channel. Thank you!

  • @insomniacsupremacy
    @insomniacsupremacy ปีที่แล้ว +63

    As an aspiring Pl. Fin. , your videos and investing philosophy are THE most helpful on TH-cam

    • @BenFelixCSI
      @BenFelixCSI  ปีที่แล้ว +29

      I just wrote the final exam for that. It was tough. I hope I passed!

    • @vonb2792
      @vonb2792 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BenFelixCSI PL.Fin in Quebec ;) congrats to you both

    • @jmc8076
      @jmc8076 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@vonb2792
      Quebec? Congrats! You must be fluent in French w/new language laws.

  • @bmahoney1568
    @bmahoney1568 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video, glad your back!!

  • @nerdistry
    @nerdistry ปีที่แล้ว +4

    10:30 Love the bullet-riddled bomber pop-up on survivorship bias.

  • @ronaldcurrent8923
    @ronaldcurrent8923 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    So weird to see you with so much hair😄! Great stuff though. love your channel and your takes are some of the takes I currently hold in the highest esteem on financial matters. Keep it up, please!

  • @chrisclayton2727
    @chrisclayton2727 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yet another amazing video, Ben!

  • @wilwazka2957
    @wilwazka2957 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for another year of perspective. Happy season, Ben.

  • @sharvo6
    @sharvo6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for being Canadian and including a Canadian view to your analysis!

  • @JosiahTaschuk
    @JosiahTaschuk ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Ben, your content is excellent as always.
    You also look like a different person with the change in hair.
    Looks good man!

  • @JosepPi
    @JosepPi ปีที่แล้ว +24

    I love to get my dreams shattered. Nothing better than a good dose of reality check to finish off the day.
    Jokes aside, I really appreciate this. With the FIRE movement on fire these days (no pun intended) I hope this video gets the recognition you have been deserving for so many years.
    Nice hair!

    • @tomlxyz
      @tomlxyz ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Every time I see a "successful" story of someone doing FIRE it's someone who had a really well paying job (something barely anyone can achieve) and later severly cut down expenses to a degree that's sometimes below middle class.
      I'm not sure what the point of struggling through life is just so you're "independant"

    • @BTrain-is8ch
      @BTrain-is8ch ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@tomlxyz Define "really well paying". Something like a third of American households bring in six figures and a quarter of individuals do. I think most people believe a six figure income amounts to being pretty well paid.

    • @strider3164
      @strider3164 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@tomlxyz of course not everyone can achieve retirement by 45 or something crazy. But the core aspects of the FIRE movement (be responsible, live frugally, save aggressively so you can spend less time working) can apply to a lot, if not the majority of working Americans.

  • @MrBigWig
    @MrBigWig ปีที่แล้ว +225

    A video about the superior variable spending rules would be great 😇

    • @SuperFlamethrower
      @SuperFlamethrower ปีที่แล้ว +6

      That video about intl diversification would be good too.

    • @jamesandersonwalsh
      @jamesandersonwalsh ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I think this is what Paul Merriman teaches, right? In bull years you could pull more, and in bear years you spend less and hunker down. Sounds good in theory, but I just wonder how many folks have the proper financial situation to be able to under spend in those down years.

    • @tb13493
      @tb13493 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@jamesandersonwalsh Good point. Take this year for example, markets are down but CPI is way up. I don't think most people would succeed in reducing spending this year by much.

    • @geramer
      @geramer ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Rebalancing portfolio based on asset allocation (say 60:40) shall achieve this automatically. Plus we only make equity withdraw to fund debt and debt withdraw to fund life.

    • @adamfirynowicz689
      @adamfirynowicz689 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Exactly! Ben spoke multiple times about the variable spending and it really seems like a smart thing to do. Too bad there is no video about it, I'd love to find out more. What I'm especially curious about is how it affects failure rate and how much less capital does one need comparing to constant spending.

  • @jsmith108
    @jsmith108 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent video, glad to have found your channel

  • @jayhawk09
    @jayhawk09 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    you're such a good presenter! great speaking voice too

  • @sagarshah4214
    @sagarshah4214 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much for sharing this!

  • @TheSteinbitt
    @TheSteinbitt ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I love the term “longevity risk” :)

  • @FR-nc3vb
    @FR-nc3vb ปีที่แล้ว +107

    Hi Ben, I just wanted to say that your videos are outstanding and you deserve more recognition. Your videos made a huge difference in my view on investing and I sincerely want to thank you for providing all this information. Wishing you the best!

  • @jeffmiller1140
    @jeffmiller1140 ปีที่แล้ว

    Subscribed! Thank you, Ben!

  • @essenceofsias
    @essenceofsias ปีที่แล้ว

    Great value here, thanks Ben!

  • @holdencawffle626
    @holdencawffle626 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ben you're the best. I could pull that trigger right now (and still work pt). I'm scared to though!!

  • @lorenAmabile
    @lorenAmabile ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you. Just what I needed to watch. My hubby and I are directors of our farm business and own property, plus small pensions. I am nearly 62, hubby is 65. We have started to save to retire from the farm, and possibly live on rental income, I'd really appreciate you go LIVE and talk about how to earn passive income online and retire comfortably, let’s say $1M consider financial planning.
    It really isn’t about how much you save, it’s about how you manage your money. Whether you work to earn income or invest, it still boils down to income vs expenses, so yeah you may look into financial advisors for a strategy that suits your timing

    • @jmc8076
      @jmc8076 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Love our Canadian farmers! Thank you. Not easy. Agree not what you earn it’s what you keep. Wealth is also about good health. It can cost a lot as you get over 65 yo incl Canada (search longterm care costs) and w/o it you can’t enjoy life nor can those who love you and worry. Best of luck.

  • @Moochie79
    @Moochie79 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Another great video! Thanks Ben.

  • @lucasvasconcelos9156
    @lucasvasconcelos9156 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Ben, amazing video! Nice haircut!

  • @fsmoura
    @fsmoura 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The two papers mentioned in the video, but not listed in the video description:
    Choi, James J. "Popular personal financial advice versus the professors." Journal of Economic Perspectives 36.4 (2022): 167-192.
    David Blanchett, C. F. P. "Exploring the retirement consumption puzzle." Journal of Financial Planning 27.5 (2014): 34.

  • @TheSteezyCheese
    @TheSteezyCheese ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing content!
    Thanks

  • @fredatlas4396
    @fredatlas4396 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    At the moment here in the UK, Legal & General are offering a 6% annuity for 65yrs or older. Of course I do realise there are other factors that may make someone want to do a drawdown. But a 6% annuity sounds like a very good deal to me and you won't need to worry about investments, or stock markets anymore, sleep soundly

  • @lubokanev7436
    @lubokanev7436 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    A video on variable withdrawal rates would be greatly appreciated.

  • @schajaffar5792
    @schajaffar5792 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Yes can you do a video on international diversification? Thanks, very informative video.👍😊

  • @FreckleFinance
    @FreckleFinance ปีที่แล้ว

    I just finished the CIFP Retirement planning course and I loved learning about the assumptions used and not what I keep hearing online LOL

  • @mattjaco81
    @mattjaco81 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I plan on using financial guardrails which adjust spending based on market returns along with having a cash buffer for down years. Couple that with a well diversified portfolio including value, blend, growth, reits and bonds and a 4-5% withdrawal rate for 40 years is doable. Then throw some part time work in and you are golden. Many different models show this is possible. Of course we cannot predict the future but don’t be afraid to spend money in retirement. Much more than 2.7%

    • @andrewb9595
      @andrewb9595 ปีที่แล้ว

      No gold? I know it seems like a waste but it actually helps a lot in bringing up withdrawal rates by smoothing out the volatility of a portfolio and reducing drawdowns. Read up on PortfolioCharts "Three Secret Ingredients of the Most Efficient Portfolios"

  • @KBXen
    @KBXen ปีที่แล้ว

    Ben, hope you’re keeping well. Thank you for all the information.

  • @thankunext1625
    @thankunext1625 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    Ben.. with hair? I'm shook. 😱 It looks so good though!

    • @BenFelixCSI
      @BenFelixCSI  ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Thank you!

    • @Omar-et7sb
      @Omar-et7sb ปีที่แล้ว +7

      That's not Ben. Clearly... That's his evil hairy twin who comes to crush our Safe Withdrawal Rate dreams!

  • @BillyHarvey
    @BillyHarvey ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I found the thinking interesting about why older data is surprisingly just as useful given modern technology, but maybe could be simplified to the musing that technology doesn't make any given investment more valuable than any other since all investors are basically competing with the same edge (better information). e.g. Biff's future stock price book was only useful in the past - if everyone'd had it, then not so much

  • @bc41
    @bc41 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Ben, Thanks for another great video. Does the life expectancy of a couple mean at least one lasts 25 years, or do both last that long?

    • @Krashoan
      @Krashoan ปีที่แล้ว +4

      If you look into the header of the on-screen table being referenced at the time (onscreen around 5:28), it states that the life expectancy is "in years of the last survivor from a ... heterosexual couple". So that would mean at least one lasts 25 years.

    • @bc41
      @bc41 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Krashoan cool thanks. I missed it!

  • @BrendanGreenwood-sy6un
    @BrendanGreenwood-sy6un ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Ben, your videos are great! I was wondering what software you use to create them and do the images? Many thanks in advance.

  • @yomama005
    @yomama005 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you Ben!

  • @marianahenriquez7003
    @marianahenriquez7003 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    This is a good example as to why rules in finance need to be analyzed, and considered in the present time, rather than blindly followed. Thank you Ben for your thorough analysis

    • @Deltron6060
      @Deltron6060 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      They should be labeled as Guidelines, not Rules.

    • @jmc8076
      @jmc8076 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agreed. Also always DYOR, critically/ independently and do what’s best and right for you. Be a student not a follower esp a blind one. Cheers

  • @theoisme
    @theoisme 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks, ive adjusted my calculations and now retire comfortably at 106 👍

  • @Ateszika
    @Ateszika ปีที่แล้ว +27

    is there a Hair Growth ETF - looks promising

  • @fib6156
    @fib6156 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Would be interesting to do more of pwr as it takes out the question of when to retire. Then also compare to practice at endowments. This is much more relevant to people that have higher absolute spending and can easily adjust annual spending by just reducing eg travel. Then also compare to buying direct inflation-adjusted annuities in the market. Thanks

  • @DavidS-iy8bb
    @DavidS-iy8bb ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video particularly the variability of draw down which warrants much greater exploration.

  • @neilcook1652
    @neilcook1652 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very helpful, thank you....

  • @djpuplex
    @djpuplex ปีที่แล้ว +46

    Holy hair growth 💇💇🙆🙅

    • @wcg66
      @wcg66 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      6.8% hair growth to keep pace with inflation.

    • @caniggiaful
      @caniggiaful 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He has since returned to primarily investing in hair value.

    • @KrishnanV9
      @KrishnanV9 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@wcg66😂😂

  • @Rekke_yt
    @Rekke_yt ปีที่แล้ว

    Hair looking good on you Ben!

  • @emilinhocorneta
    @emilinhocorneta ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video, thought-provoking insights galore! I'm seconding what another commenter said about variable spending rate, not so much taking the markets into consideration but taking the age of the retiree instead. Meaning, a 65 year old will be healthier than an 85 one to do more fun (ie: expensive) things! And can't insurances help to reduce the risks elaborate on the video?

  • @Moms58
    @Moms58 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well done 👏

  • @jsurette7521
    @jsurette7521 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I always enjoy these objective analyses. I'm glad you mentioned SWR is theoretical and probably irrelevant to most people. In the real world, let's face it - the vast majority of people don't save remotely "enough" by any measure - and yet are somehow fine.

    • @briandbeaudin9166
      @briandbeaudin9166 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Depends upon your definition of fine. Having to work as a greeter at Wal mart when you are 85 isn't my idea of fine.

  • @MrJoaopaulofurtado
    @MrJoaopaulofurtado 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you Ben for letting me know that I will work until I die

  • @money3ss
    @money3ss ปีที่แล้ว

    Good Job Ben. Besides using life expectancy is also flawed as 50% will outlived pass that age. Inflation is also a killer.

  • @thelouderyouscream
    @thelouderyouscream ปีที่แล้ว

    Rigorous, thank you.

  • @southernc4919
    @southernc4919 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    If you ditch your financial advisor, you can add 1-2% or more

  • @red149
    @red149 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    we are at the end of a long time debt cycle, do you think the same rule applied to the last 70-80 years will apply in the next 10-20 years ?
    to be clear, I am referring to the bond market .

  • @rzqletum
    @rzqletum ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for the great video!

  • @ldg1414
    @ldg1414 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Factoring japan into investment decisions always strikes me as sanitizing expectations a bit too much. When the PE ratios were like in the 60's, yeah that's gonna take a good few decades to straighten out.
    And the chances of the U.S. being invaded is so much lower than a lot of other countries east of it. I think that's a solid reason why the US stock market has performed so well.

  • @dforrest4503
    @dforrest4503 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I think if you use some guardrails, your withdrawal rate could be about double that. Use it during the “go-go” years when you can enjoy it!

  • @Doso777
    @Doso777 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sounds like the yield of a large cap dividend stock portfolio. All that research and we've come full circle.

  • @lloydusdavies
    @lloydusdavies ปีที่แล้ว

    @BenFelixCSI Have you ever discussed how currency exposure should be used in a portfolio? What % of your portfolio should be in assets listed in your "home" country? Should you consider whether any international ETF exposure is hedged to your home country currency or not? Should your come country portfolio as a % of total portfolio be different depending on which country you live in? Should it be different depending on how you expect to use the portfolio i.e. if you expect to spend it down to zero or close to zero before you die should the home country currency % be higher than a situation where Monte Carlo simulations would suggest you will always pass on a portfolio to your next of kin and perhaps increasing international exposure will increase overall return in the long term. Would love it you could cover this in a video or podcast.

  • @ST-xc3qw
    @ST-xc3qw ปีที่แล้ว

    Great advise
    Thank you

  • @randolphh8005
    @randolphh8005 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The assumptions on age are wrong for the elderly! I agree on the need to consider a slightly lower withdrawal rate to make it 30 years. BUT, he minimizes the fact that he is talking ONLY about the portfolio. There are other sources of income outside the portfolio primarily Social Security and hard assets such as your home.
    Planning for the 95th percentile of longevity is folly. 65 plus 30 is 95! For older folks be aware that life expectancy has been declining not increasing. I don’t know anybody that is 95 years old. When I was working in geriatrics till last year, meeting a 100 year old was as frequent as meeting a celebrity. I know lots of people in my circle dead by 75 and 80. How many homeless people do you know who are 90? They don’t exist.
    The reality is that for almost all couples one person will be dead by 85 which is a 20 year horizon, then spending drops a lot due to age and being single. Sure healthcare can rise at the end of life, but it does not need to be self funded, so it is often not relevant, in fact those without a surviving portfolio will receive care for “free” while those with a portfolio will be asked to self fund!. Most seniors live on only Social Security when they are old, so any portfolio balance is nice, but not necessary when very old.
    I’m not advocating for not having savings, just for keeping it real and not scaring people so that they die with large portfolios because they were too afraid to enjoy their money while they were alive! You don’t need a 100% chance of success. 80% is probably fine for most.

  • @ianauandrei
    @ianauandrei ปีที่แล้ว

    I would love a channel like you for EU person.

  • @michalzuk1705
    @michalzuk1705 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great video, as usual. I do find the inclusion of the Cuban Missile Crisis a bit bizarre, however. If things had gone wrong, it wouldn't have just been a catastrophic outcome like the other example you used, but the whole world would have been destroyed. So, it's not like you would gain anything from not taking on the risk. Either your assets appreciate in value if the crisis is averted or you and everyone else is dead anyway. Asset allocation choices don't matter when it comes to the end of the world.

    • @cornoc
      @cornoc 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      you're assuming that if things had gone worse, it would have led to all-out nuclear war, which is just an assumption.

    • @patriciabarnhart1886
      @patriciabarnhart1886 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My husband was on the ground there during the Cuban Missile Crises, straight out of Marine Corp Paris Island Boot Camp….

  • @DanieleO.
    @DanieleO. ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I bet the most frequent comment down here won't be about personal finance..

  • @Ev1dnce
    @Ev1dnce ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am invested in a market cap weighted global tracker ETF, currently all in equities (at least 20-25 years till (early) retirement)
    Is the mentioned 2-3% SWR applicable for someone who „buys the haystack“? Or is it made with an investor in mind investing only domestically with some exposure to international developed markets (as mentioned in the video).
    I assume emerging markets were also not part of the analysis.
    Also which duration were the bonds used in the sample? (Short term, thus more cash equivalent, or mid-/long-term)?
    Love your videos and podcast!!!

  • @michaelbundy5623
    @michaelbundy5623 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Does the 2.7% include "dividends".
    I.e if im in vt or s and p 500. And get the 2-3% annual dividend should that be included in the 2.7% safe withdrawl rate or no.
    It was confusing thanks

  • @sleepless2541
    @sleepless2541 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hey ben, what do you think of the book a non-random walk down wall street by andrew lo? i heard the book shows evidence of 2/3 of actively managed funds out performing the market for some 30 years ending in the 1990s, might be good for you to look at it ben

  • @djfoo000
    @djfoo000 ปีที่แล้ว

    The podcast segment at the end has lower volume than the main video. Would be great to equalize the volume for future videos.

  • @jmnthe3rd
    @jmnthe3rd 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That's a big difference!

  • @albertorodriguez4619
    @albertorodriguez4619 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In this case, I see many advantages of having a high dividend ETF (distributing). Every year you get whatever the distribution is while the principal remains always untouched.

  • @rod9829
    @rod9829 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ben when are you making a video on “investing in art”, have seen adds for it everywhere and I can only roll my eyes

  • @jb_makesgames2264
    @jb_makesgames2264 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great Video - Have a look at the retirement research of Wade Pfau and he came up with very much of the same numbers re drawdown rates and outliving one's capital..

  • @marcpernia8487
    @marcpernia8487 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Ben, are you guys selling that beanie in the Rational Reminder store?

  • @mr.forever677
    @mr.forever677 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    @ben Felix - I followed him at less than 10K subs, now almost 300K. keep us informed.

  • @PapaCharlie9
    @PapaCharlie9 ปีที่แล้ว

    How did the paper address inflation? Assume a constant average inflation? Or did the bootstrap include inflation data?

  • @rodipit2680
    @rodipit2680 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for content, I have a question, is it your investing decision to have four children? Or just parenting is your passion? If you have already created such video, sorry, I'm new to this channel

  • @michaelmahoney1829
    @michaelmahoney1829 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you use a modeling software for plans ; like Money Guide?

  • @PH-dm8ew
    @PH-dm8ew ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Love your channel. I am thinking as an American at least i Wont live as long and will need less- lol. Sometimes you are a bit over my head though. Can you explain what a block bootstrap methodology is?

    • @BenFelixCSI
      @BenFelixCSI  ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Bootstrap is randomly sampling with replacement from existing data. Say you have 150 years of stock returns. In chronological order that is the historical data. You can create a “new” data series by randomly pulling returns out of that sample until you have 150 years of returns. Bootstrap typically does this 1,000+ times and then you have whole bunch of different possible outcomes stemming from the historical return series. Block bootstrap is the same thing but instead of 1 year at a time, you randomly sample blocks of years, like 10 years.

    • @PH-dm8ew
      @PH-dm8ew ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@BenFelixCSI Thank you

  • @jsmith108
    @jsmith108 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I would like to hear your thoughts on international diversification. Warren Buffett suggests SP500. Also, isnt SP500 companies exposed to international markets, since many large companies have international presence?

  • @geerakindeathrider5693
    @geerakindeathrider5693 ปีที่แล้ว

    do u have a beginners play list for someone who is interested in learning about finances and stocks?

  • @lovethomassowell
    @lovethomassowell 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Did Professor Scott say in your interview that his data on the 30/70 domestic/foreign equity asset allocation indicated 3.4%?

  • @PH-dm8ew
    @PH-dm8ew ปีที่แล้ว

    I would love to see and in depth review of inflation causes. I know Milton Friedman was a big proponent of all inflation being monetary in nature. Yet both the inflation of the 70's (oil supply shock) and the 2022's (covid supply shock) were supply side in nature and not really purely monetary causes. The US has been trying to create inflation for decades with no luck. It took a supply shortage to materially change the inflation curve. Thoughts?

  • @RaMpAgE6607
    @RaMpAgE6607 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please make a video on stock options. I’ve often heard selling put contracts on the market has outperformed the market

  • @spacejesus570
    @spacejesus570 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How do I buy nuclear winter options?

  • @27k76
    @27k76 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hair growing nicely brother

  • @happycampers6592
    @happycampers6592 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Ben, new subscriber. Do you have any content on income stream investing? I plan on retiring in about a year, at age 60, with a moderate pension and a decent portfolio of dividend stocks/ETFs. Hoping to get consistent income from the portfolio via dividends and options trading.

    • @russellsawatsky167
      @russellsawatsky167 ปีที่แล้ว

      In the TH-cam search field, enter the terms: Ben Felix Dividends. Ben has a lot to say about dividends and income investing. I don't think he has every commented on options trading.

  • @DBCOOPER888
    @DBCOOPER888 ปีที่แล้ว

    US not facing huge economic downturns could be the case of good governance and monetary policy, with a healthy entrepreneurial environment compared to other countries. This doesn't need to be random chance.