Thank you for this video. I needed this to learn the disciplinary practices and grow to become someone I would desire to be. After my adv. dip. in arch tech, I have not pursued a job relating to arch. Now that it has been three years since I am ready to go back to architecture school and continue to finish my undergrad. Again thank you!!!
@@architech.network Yeah now that you say it, the last time we had issues with model groups for a multistory in revit coming across, we stopped using it due to the lighting. Have tried on other buildings types and has worked well.
Great summary. Which schools do any of this? Many don't let you see any software before 3rd year, as they want you to "focus" on the basics. I would do Python since year 1, why not?. Also why not just start practicing all of these softwares since the beginning of your "career" /studies. Oh wait, you just don't have time with all of the school work load.
Ramiro, totally appreciate what your saying! I don't agree to withholding students from technology during the first year, a huge mistake in my opinion! But also get your view on the workload, possibly we need to combine learning new technology skills with the delivery of assignments so your developing both your design and technology skillset simultaneously.
I feel you. But if you can't design your way out of a paper bag, what's the pt? None of these platforms will teach someone how to design. They're just tools.
@@HippieP629 True but the issue we are finding is students spend 90% of time in university being taught how to design and very little time actually being equipped with the critical tools you need as an architect to design with. And whilst yes a lot of these can be classed as tools at the moment, this phrase is setting us back as an industry as these 'tools' are about to become way more than that, your computer will be a key design collaborator, for a lot of people it already is.
@@architech.network Being taught to design the majority of the time is how it should be. Students of all ages... take it upon YOU to improve yourself. Coursera, youtube, tiktok, udemy, linkedin learning, meetups, hackathons and on and on. If you're asked to go on site for CA and talk with the GC or structural engineer, do you think they're going to care how well you know dynamo? My advice: soak up as much info about design, supplement that with software knowledge but most importantly spend time on jobsites doing ACTUAL construction. You'll get way more respect from your boss and your trade partners that way. The problem with thinking software will design it for you is that there's always new software to not be reliant on.
At no point are we saying students should only learn software, of course its important to become a complete architect. But I don't agree that students should go though architecture school.... pay thousands of dollars and get into debt and then be told you have to learn all the other stuff in order to actually get a job on TH-cam. Secondly the idea that software's change all the time is not really true, Revit is 20 years old..... yet still many architects down even know how to use it, Rhino is almost 20 years old also, Grasshopper is 14 years old.... by understanding the technologies we have now also means you can very quickly pick up new ones. Lastly the most innovative designers, contractors engineers all have one thing in common, they all have gravitated to adopting technology. I don't disagree that your point above are all valid but in an industry that is becoming more and more antiquated and moving backwards in efficacy to build. We believe technology is a key component in doing that.
Please don't stop posting this type of content. It is desperately needed from industry pros such as yourselves. *SUBSCRIBED!*
This is an amazingly structured presentation! thank you for this kind of content !
Thank you for this video. I needed this to learn the disciplinary practices and grow to become someone I would desire to be. After my adv. dip. in arch tech, I have not pursued a job relating to arch. Now that it has been three years since I am ready to go back to architecture school and continue to finish my undergrad. Again thank you!!!
Thank you, it's quite informative
Glad it was helpful!
Heard you say luminon a few times, it's lum-ion,
thanks for the vid very interesting to know whats going on behind the scenes
Great video, very rich.
So cool! Keep up the good work
Thanks!
Great overview👌 twinmotion 2022 seems to be 10x better than 2020 with the path tracing. Def one to watch too.
How is the importing? That seemed to be a massive barrier to using it last time we tested it?
@@architech.network Yeah now that you say it, the last time we had issues with model groups for a multistory in revit coming across, we stopped using it due to the lighting. Have tried on other buildings types and has worked well.
Obrigado.
#TeamATN Report! 🙌
Started here #TeamATN
@@architech.network Boom! 🔥
Great summary. Which schools do any of this? Many don't let you see any software before 3rd year, as they want you to "focus" on the basics. I would do Python since year 1, why not?. Also why not just start practicing all of these softwares since the beginning of your "career" /studies. Oh wait, you just don't have time with all of the school work load.
Ramiro, totally appreciate what your saying! I don't agree to withholding students from technology during the first year, a huge mistake in my opinion! But also get your view on the workload, possibly we need to combine learning new technology skills with the delivery of assignments so your developing both your design and technology skillset simultaneously.
I feel you. But if you can't design your way out of a paper bag, what's the pt? None of these platforms will teach someone how to design. They're just tools.
@@HippieP629 True but the issue we are finding is students spend 90% of time in university being taught how to design and very little time actually being equipped with the critical tools you need as an architect to design with. And whilst yes a lot of these can be classed as tools at the moment, this phrase is setting us back as an industry as these 'tools' are about to become way more than that, your computer will be a key design collaborator, for a lot of people it already is.
@@architech.network Being taught to design the majority of the time is how it should be. Students of all ages... take it upon YOU to improve yourself. Coursera, youtube, tiktok, udemy, linkedin learning, meetups, hackathons and on and on. If you're asked to go on site for CA and talk with the GC or structural engineer, do you think they're going to care how well you know dynamo? My advice: soak up as much info about design, supplement that with software knowledge but most importantly spend time on jobsites doing ACTUAL construction. You'll get way more respect from your boss and your trade partners that way. The problem with thinking software will design it for you is that there's always new software to not be reliant on.
At no point are we saying students should only learn software, of course its important to become a complete architect. But I don't agree that students should go though architecture school.... pay thousands of dollars and get into debt and then be told you have to learn all the other stuff in order to actually get a job on TH-cam. Secondly the idea that software's change all the time is not really true, Revit is 20 years old..... yet still many architects down even know how to use it, Rhino is almost 20 years old also, Grasshopper is 14 years old.... by understanding the technologies we have now also means you can very quickly pick up new ones. Lastly the most innovative designers, contractors engineers all have one thing in common, they all have gravitated to adopting technology. I don't disagree that your point above are all valid but in an industry that is becoming more and more antiquated and moving backwards in efficacy to build. We believe technology is a key component in doing that.