Pete 100% you can win your own tournament. Your participation against the largest volume of players and best competition should not be set aside because your the host. However upon winning, you shouldn’t take a prize and redistribute that to the next 3-5 players below you in either and even or placement specific dispersement.
No, don't distribute Pete's winnings to ranks 2+. That creates an incentive for finalists in losing game positions to attack Pete's opponents so Pete will win. If they think they are losing the final, they would be incentivized to attack Pete's opponents so that Pete wins and distributes money to them.
Pete I got to say I really appreciate you telling me to get off my chair and move a bit. I watch your videos from a bunker I work at. The hours are quite long sitting in this office chair, so when you motivate/remind me to stand up and stretch a bit. I feel a lot better for the rest of the day.
SLEEPING while streaming: You are right Pete the value is your mind set as you play. The way you interact with us make it more engaging and entertaining. But Reggie is still a steam bomber and continues to keep you on top. Remember he has dice. Love you stuff man.
39:00 We watch you because you're entertaining. We watch you for interesting takes on philosophy, we watch you for Risk, but everyone has their own reason. I started playing risk after watching some youtube vids by you that I enjoyed. It aint just for the Risk content, and I'd bet a few people would watch you comment marbles on stream. It's somehow the fact that you're a good showman that makes the content worth watching, not necessarily what the content exactly is, but then again, I'm just a casual risk player, I dabble from time to time, even giving wins away to people who were nice to me. I'm not competitive in Risk and I don't really need to learn it for any reason. I just enjoy the content because it's fun.
11:35 I think playing against you is the biggest appeal of the tournament. Play but make it clear the prize money can’t go to you. However, I think that in the event that you win the finals the finalists play a 5 player game and victor gets the spoils or you split the prize money among the 5.
Pete, if you're NA, you can also help SA out a bit by having a position in Asia (ie Kamchaka and surrounding areas) and leavig lot's of 1s for their Asia exterior to take cards from right? Which preserves good neighbour behaviour.
Hey Pete, or anyone else that might know. How many ranked games do you have to play before you get a rank, I've played about 7-8 games but can't find my rank anywhere.
The original form of the game had progressive cards, not fixed. Fixed cards were introduced less than forty years ago (maybe less than thirty years ago). The original French game had random (card-based) placement and progressive cards. Second edition had the manual placement/random placement option, progressive cards, and standing armies (starting with X number of troops based on the number of players). The original game NEEDED progressive cards. because there were no standing armies. You drew cards, placed one troop on each territory, and went from there. The original game was incredibly slow to play, and it doesn't anticipate ever having a stack much larger than 30 troops. (There just aren't very many troop pieces per color.)
Pete, you can win your own tourney. Brian Shaw won his own strongman competition twice and it's become the biggest competition in the sport. Everyone actually loves when he wins. You'll be the same way
Of course junk in the trunk is lovely, but so is a thinny minnie. Does the fact that the sunset is beautiful make the moonlight less beautiful? No. They are both the great beauty of the sun just in different forms.
I agree with the others, you should be competing in ever facet of your tournament. If you feel dirty about the prize just move everything down 1 peg from where ever you place. People compete in it to play with you and because it's your tournament.
Thanks for the compliment! I don't expect to have or think I deserve to have more subs. I'm just grateful that people enjoy the show and hope I can continue to offer value for the viewer's time.
Pete, given the success of the last KPO, I would almost guarantee you being able to seek sponsorship from SMG or another brand so you could actually win your own tournament
People doing massive push content like Diablo 2 do actually sleep on stream. And sometimes the viewership matches the awake shit. It's nuts. Edit: it's not so much to let people watch you sleep but to keep stream truly running for 48 hours even when most people can't stay awake that long. It's still a 48 hour stream if you sleep.
Challenge Idea: Win a game but you must only attack one player at a time you will pick te first target until they die at that point you pick a new person and can only attact their territory 😊
Not exactly sure why Magenta decided to hit you and blue equally. Especially when it was green who eliminated their Asia position, and then broke their North America. I guess it's a good indicator of how MAD works. "I am losing, so I will drag the world down with me! Allies included!"
Imo if you aren't going to, or feel you're unable to compete at the same level as everyone else for the same thing as everyone else then you shouldn't. Perhaps you should consider getting a few organisers together, people who are community stalwarts that have a good understanding of the game but are not at the level required to compete at the very top. In chess for example low level GMs and IMs (2nd highest title) will organise/commentate on the event while the highest rated players will compete. I get it might be challenging to get that kind of setup but its worth trying and pursuing, you are one of the best players in the world and the most popular character in the community and you not being able to play in any tournament, either at all or to a restricted capacity is a huge loss for that tournament. I think everyone would agree that we'd rather see KP compete in KPO rather than organise it, but its probably one of those have your cake or eat it scenarios unfortunately. That all being said, regardless of whether you organise/commentate, compete or the awkward balance of both, I will be watching and supporting all the same
I think the key difference here between something like Chess and Risk is FFA contains a reputational element and due to the massive success of the show (definitely not something I'm complaining about) I will never be on a level playing field. I could compete as an alt but I feel like that contains with it a whole different set of problems for fairness so I'm fine to play my best, take my wins and losses as they come and be happy that so many enjoy my work!
@@TheKillPeteStrategyWhat if you get 6 accounts, loaded with all the map packs courtesy of smg that you could give the details out to players, anonymous accounts so that nobody knows who is who, except for stylistic clues etc. Might be complicated in terms of the stream as you'd likely have to say who is who but I guess there always has to be an element of trust, as two players could message each other to see who is who etc but they could message each other to collaborate now anyway. Its a complicated one for sure but we are all very grateful for your efforts, all the best Pete 👍
Just make it so top 6/7 split prize if you don’t make the final top 6 get paid if you make the fine it’s top 7 but you don’t get paid but still get to play for the win
I think the mood runs the gamut I think the thing that is changed is after experiencing the same scenario over and over again I find myself less tolerant and patient to terrible play which is not good strategically for a patience mode like this one
Pete 100% you can win your own tournament. Your participation against the largest volume of players and best competition should not be set aside because your the host. However upon winning, you shouldn’t take a prize and redistribute that to the next 3-5 players below you in either and even or placement specific dispersement.
Yah Pete should totally be allowed to win it!
I say donate the money to charity if he wins
@@ilb9387 was about to comment this! Sounds like a good idea
No, don't distribute Pete's winnings to ranks 2+. That creates an incentive for finalists in losing game positions to attack Pete's opponents so Pete will win. If they think they are losing the final, they would be incentivized to attack Pete's opponents so that Pete wins and distributes money to them.
Pete I got to say I really appreciate you telling me to get off my chair and move a bit. I watch your videos from a bunker I work at. The hours are quite long sitting in this office chair, so when you motivate/remind me to stand up and stretch a bit. I feel a lot better for the rest of the day.
SLEEPING while streaming: You are right Pete the value is your mind set as you play. The way you interact with us make it more engaging and entertaining. But Reggie is still a steam bomber and continues to keep you on top. Remember he has dice. Love you stuff man.
33:19 I’ve never seen every bonus in classic fixed been claimed before
Well played. Good game.
16:27 Interesting glitch
43:21 Kyle already made the best Reggie clip. I think about that every now and then and it still makes me chuckle😆
I've watched quite a few of these that I need to predict and repeat how Pete says "What is up Risk Takers?"
39:00
We watch you because you're entertaining. We watch you for interesting takes on philosophy, we watch you for Risk, but everyone has their own reason. I started playing risk after watching some youtube vids by you that I enjoyed. It aint just for the Risk content, and I'd bet a few people would watch you comment marbles on stream. It's somehow the fact that you're a good showman that makes the content worth watching, not necessarily what the content exactly is, but then again, I'm just a casual risk player, I dabble from time to time, even giving wins away to people who were nice to me. I'm not competitive in Risk and I don't really need to learn it for any reason. I just enjoy the content because it's fun.
@38:50 You are the value Pete. ❤
❤️❤️❤️
11:35
I think playing against you is the biggest appeal of the tournament. Play but make it clear the prize money can’t go to you.
However, I think that in the event that you win the finals the finalists play a 5 player game and victor gets the spoils or you split the prize money among the 5.
Hey Pete. What* would you say to a competition for just one particular map and setting? e.g. becoming The META Champion?
As long as it's not caps...
Pete, if you're NA, you can also help SA out a bit by having a position in Asia (ie Kamchaka and surrounding areas) and leavig lot's of 1s for their Asia exterior to take cards from right? Which preserves good neighbour behaviour.
Hey Pete, or anyone else that might know. How many ranked games do you have to play before you get a rank, I've played about 7-8 games but can't find my rank anywhere.
Are you playing ranked or casual public?
@@TheKillPeteStrategy FFA ranked
49:00 I think they might have been trying to bully both you and blue out of your bonuses so they could have all four and you two would fight in Asia
Pete what do you think if us players dedicated using one of the emotes in game as a universal way to communicate deadliest trap to eachother?
The original form of the game had progressive cards, not fixed. Fixed cards were introduced less than forty years ago (maybe less than thirty years ago). The original French game had random (card-based) placement and progressive cards. Second edition had the manual placement/random placement option, progressive cards, and standing armies (starting with X number of troops based on the number of players). The original game NEEDED progressive cards. because there were no standing armies. You drew cards, placed one troop on each territory, and went from there. The original game was incredibly slow to play, and it doesn't anticipate ever having a stack much larger than 30 troops. (There just aren't very many troop pieces per color.)
I loved the thumbnail 😂😂
RIIIIIIIIIIIISK TEKÖÖÖÖÖÖÖRS 0:03
Pete, you can win your own tourney. Brian Shaw won his own strongman competition twice and it's become the biggest competition in the sport. Everyone actually loves when he wins. You'll be the same way
Of course junk in the trunk is lovely, but so is a thinny minnie. Does the fact that the sunset is beautiful make the moonlight less beautiful? No. They are both the great beauty of the sun just in different forms.
It's been forever since the last fixed Friday on friday feels odd now. Bring back the fixed Mondays lol.
7 days = forever when you love Fixed Friday
I agree with the others, you should be competing in ever facet of your tournament. If you feel dirty about the prize just move everything down 1 peg from where ever you place. People compete in it to play with you and because it's your tournament.
Pete, you're not gonna kick a thicc out of the bed. 😂
Honest question? Why don't you have more subscribers? You are a great entertainer!!
Thanks for the compliment! I don't expect to have or think I deserve to have more subs. I'm just grateful that people enjoy the show and hope I can continue to offer value for the viewer's time.
Pete, given the success of the last KPO, I would almost guarantee you being able to seek sponsorship from SMG or another brand so you could actually win your own tournament
How did blue not kill you is beyond me. In all of my games my opponent will slam me if I sit next to them and I have fewer troops
i haven't finished, but why not switch to NA here 14:46. Purple just got deleted on the rest of the map.
cuz no-one would let him hold
28:50 Bruh blue puts troops into Europe instead of Africa, says to attack black, and doesn't even at least break green, wtf is that turn?
The Sleepeteman!!!
People doing massive push content like Diablo 2 do actually sleep on stream. And sometimes the viewership matches the awake shit. It's nuts.
Edit: it's not so much to let people watch you sleep but to keep stream truly running for 48 hours even when most people can't stay awake that long. It's still a 48 hour stream if you sleep.
Challenge Idea: Win a game but you must only attack one player at a time you will pick te first target until they die at that point you pick a new person and can only attact their territory 😊
If you win; you should roll the prize money forward to the next one.
Not exactly sure why Magenta decided to hit you and blue equally. Especially when it was green who eliminated their Asia position, and then broke their North America. I guess it's a good indicator of how MAD works. "I am losing, so I will drag the world down with me! Allies included!"
Great game pete as always 👍❤️❤️🔥🔥❤️🔥🗿🗿🗿
Imo if you aren't going to, or feel you're unable to compete at the same level as everyone else for the same thing as everyone else then you shouldn't. Perhaps you should consider getting a few organisers together, people who are community stalwarts that have a good understanding of the game but are not at the level required to compete at the very top. In chess for example low level GMs and IMs (2nd highest title) will organise/commentate on the event while the highest rated players will compete. I get it might be challenging to get that kind of setup but its worth trying and pursuing, you are one of the best players in the world and the most popular character in the community and you not being able to play in any tournament, either at all or to a restricted capacity is a huge loss for that tournament. I think everyone would agree that we'd rather see KP compete in KPO rather than organise it, but its probably one of those have your cake or eat it scenarios unfortunately. That all being said, regardless of whether you organise/commentate, compete or the awkward balance of both, I will be watching and supporting all the same
I think the key difference here between something like Chess and Risk is FFA contains a reputational element and due to the massive success of the show (definitely not something I'm complaining about) I will never be on a level playing field.
I could compete as an alt but I feel like that contains with it a whole different set of problems for fairness so I'm fine to play my best, take my wins and losses as they come and be happy that so many enjoy my work!
@@TheKillPeteStrategyWhat if you get 6 accounts, loaded with all the map packs courtesy of smg that you could give the details out to players, anonymous accounts so that nobody knows who is who, except for stylistic clues etc. Might be complicated in terms of the stream as you'd likely have to say who is who but I guess there always has to be an element of trust, as two players could message each other to see who is who etc but they could message each other to collaborate now anyway. Its a complicated one for sure but we are all very grateful for your efforts, all the best Pete 👍
Just make it so top 6/7 split prize if you don’t make the final top 6 get paid if you make the fine it’s top 7 but you don’t get paid but still get to play for the win
Spoiler block
Edit the comment later on to indeed spoil it 😈
Spoiler Block❤
holy shit that card luck
Great Risk playing to watch, but giving airtime to some of the ridiculous comments is quite annoying tbh.
If it makes you feel better, I would not watch you sleep. I very much enjoy your content on though. Lol
However folks want to enjoy the show is just fine by me
This Thumbnail hahahahah
Spoiler block ❤
I wanna like but it’s on 420
Algorithm boost 🔥
I hour
You’re kind of mean to people these days. You had a lot more grace in your previous fixed Fridays. It comes off as jerky when you blast beginners.
I think the mood runs the gamut
I think the thing that is changed is after experiencing the same scenario over and over again I find myself less tolerant and patient to terrible play which is not good strategically for a patience mode like this one
I would like to see my girlfriend sleeping next to me.. if I will have one. That's only good sleeping content for me
haha what happens next in this story?