Taxonomy and Systematics

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Humans have named things of importance to us since the dawn of communication (eat this, run from that...) But how do scientists organize living things and what are the levels of organization they use to describe relationships between groups? Aristotle and Linnaeus take starring roles here, but there's a lot they got wrong.
    Want more?
    Subscribe: / thepenguinprof
    FB Page: / thepenguinprof
    Twitter: / penguinprof
    Web: www.penguinprof.com/
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    VIDEO DETAILS
    Taxonomy and Systematics
    Taxonomy (G taxis: arrangement; nomia: method) is the discipline of defining groups of biological organisms on the basis of shared characteristics
    Hierarchical groups help us to identify related organisms and also describe evolutionary relationships
    Aristotle
    To understand anything, one must classify it according to it's parts
    Classified all animals into two groups: blooded and bloodless
    Pliny the Elder
    Carl Linnaeus
    Systema Naturae 10th ed. in 1758
    Binomial Nomenclature
    Where do the Names Come From?
    Latin (Classical or Medieval)
    Classical Greek
    Names of People
    Names of Places
    Other Languages
    What's In a Name?
    Morphologic Characters
    General external morphology
    Special structures
    Internal morphology
    Embryology
    Karyology and other cytological factors
    Physiological Factors
    Metabolic factors
    Body secretions
    Genic sterility factors
    Molecular Characters
    Immunological distance
    Electrophoretic differences
    Protein sequences
    DNA hybridization
    DNA and RNA sequences
    Restriction endonuclease analyses
    Other molecular differences
    Behavioral Characters
    Courtship and other ethological isolating mechanisms
    Other behavior patterns
    Ecological Characters
    Habitats and hosts
    Food
    Seasonal variations
    Parasites
    Host reactions
    Geographic Characters
    General biogeographic distribution
    Sympatric-allopatric relationship of populations
    Levels of Organization
    Linnaeus' Domains
    Linnaeus Described Six Classes of Animals
    Heart with 2 auricles, 2 ventricles. Warm, red blood
    Viviparous: Mammalia
    Oviparous: Aves
    Six Classes of Animals
    Heart with 1 auricle, 0 ventricles. Cold, puss-like blood
    Have antennae: Insecta
    Have tentacles: Vermes
    Hierarchy of Similarities
    Modern 3-Domain System
    Domain
    Kingdom
    Phylum (= Divisions in Botany)
    Class
    Order
    Family
    Genus
    Species
    Example: The Dog
    Problems...
    Linnaeus (and everyone else) wondered about where these species came from and how to define a species
    Linnaeus treated species as immutable
    Georges-Louis Leclerc, Comte de Buffon
    Compared living and fossil mammals (elephants and mammoths)
    He did not see how organisms could cross inhospitable boundaries to reach suitable environments
    He found different kinds of animals and plants in very similar, but completely isolated environments
    Age of Enlightenment
    Paleontology and the discovery of extinct species in the fossil record began to undermine the static view of nature which had persisted since Aristotle
    Species are NOT Fixed Entities
    Taxonomy and systematics is a dynamic science

ความคิดเห็น • 90

  • @sgarcata
    @sgarcata 5 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Loved this... she has such a mellow voice of convincing authority... pleasure to listen to

  • @joefelraymundbosque8661
    @joefelraymundbosque8661 8 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    The way she discuss is a hundred times better than my teacher. REALTALK.

    • @Penguinprof
      @Penguinprof  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you! And thanks for watching!

    • @joefelraymundbosque8661
      @joefelraymundbosque8661 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      A lot of thanks! This helped me out a lot for my midterm exams!

  • @EdGloss
    @EdGloss 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Maybe it's just me but I found taxonomy to be incredibly interesting and informative and one of the concepts that helped to really drive home and solidify evolution and common ancestry.

  • @jeffreyjhouser
    @jeffreyjhouser 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video! Very informative and well presented!

  • @CakeTastey
    @CakeTastey 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    GREAT video (*very* clear)
    I don't even study science as a secondary, I just like to learn new things--- and this video has sparked an interest in biology/taxonomy in me!
    Thank you for your hard work!

  • @geogre5124
    @geogre5124 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazingly insightful, thank you for this

  • @aakashsharma7410
    @aakashsharma7410 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks for melting the mountain of questions inside my head... very nice video

  • @iqzibal
    @iqzibal 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome video. Clear and simple :D

  • @fakep1234
    @fakep1234 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    I recommend your videos to all kids I encounter who are interested in science,
    Keep up the good work!!

  • @AcanLord
    @AcanLord 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Solid video.
    Useful for studying purposes.

  • @alis.2895
    @alis.2895 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is the best AP biology study channel in the whole you tube +1 from me

  • @dicksonnsiahministries1156
    @dicksonnsiahministries1156 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    kudos to you...nice video and very educative

  • @Dawnofthehead
    @Dawnofthehead 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    For an understanding of modern taxonomy and systematics, you cannot leave out cladistics. If you go to a biology conference, almost everyone there will be using cladistics for systematics. Cladistics won the "taxonomy war" a few decades ago. Most biologists now are cadists, meaning they hold to that a phylogeny must be monophyletic and that paraphyletic and polyphyletic groupings are unscientific. This video is accurate for almost everything up to the 1980s.

  • @duckspaddling
    @duckspaddling 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for this video. What are the different kingdoms?

  • @peretzo
    @peretzo 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Loved it!

  • @SoundForStudy
    @SoundForStudy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just to point out, the video was amazing! very good job and very informative, but one corrigendum, there does exist a convention for naming animals with a set of rules the way chemists do, it is called the Internation Code of Zoological Nomenclature and it dictates the rules and requirements for naming animals.

  • @arcticmaritimus2263
    @arcticmaritimus2263 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Found this so delightful

  • @lainpadang8033
    @lainpadang8033 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for this understanding

  • @t.damianboyle622
    @t.damianboyle622 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is an outstanding instructional presentation. A reference standard for all Instructors to aspire to. Big time thanks!

    • @Penguinprof
      @Penguinprof  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      So glad you found it useful!

  • @KgotsoChabangu
    @KgotsoChabangu 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is great, Thank you.

  • @26snoopy82
    @26snoopy82 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video you really explained it very clearly!

    • @Penguinprof
      @Penguinprof  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +26snoopy82 Thanks for watching! I'm glad it was helpful.

  • @saishakarbhari7794
    @saishakarbhari7794 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    this video has really been very helpful....

  • @rrivas5991
    @rrivas5991 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video Thank you!!!

  • @beaangela8422
    @beaangela8422 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I really like the way how you discuss

  • @GrigorisDeoudis
    @GrigorisDeoudis 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nicely done! Came here by looking for the definition of 'type specimen'. After two years of keeping and learning about succulents, plant systematics are still difficult to digest for me, a Greek guy that has an advantage of knowing what all these Greek words mean. Plus, I love Latin language and the pronunciation of these - for some - complex binomial names. So, I have just landed here, I am going to hit the subscribe button and if there's no video about the 'type specimens' (one that can make it very clear, for example, what means "designing a holotype") it would be great if you can make one.
    Thanks again!

    • @whatabouttheearth
      @whatabouttheearth 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Type specimen is the documented individual that is in a museum vault or somewhere, that is the example of that species. It's literally a single individual specimen. With animals many are preserved, with plants they preserved the leaves or roots, and with fossils they preserve the fossil of course. For every species that is named in binomial nomenclature there is a single dead individual in an arboretum vault, or museum vault that is the type specimen.
      The remains of Carl Linneaus himself is the type specimen for Homo sapiens, although I don't think he is in a vault, obviously we treat Homo sapiens different and we have a certain familiarity with them, lol, I hope.

  • @ShariqUddin45
    @ShariqUddin45 13 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    4:27 WISE lol 😂

  • @ninjachicken5263
    @ninjachicken5263 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    you have truly changed my life. I really felt like i could relate to the penguins, especially the one who was missing its head. the video was a great metaphor for the threat that western capitalism poses to the wellbeing and survival of penguins everywhere. i will never forget the kindness that you brought to my life when you posted this. How can i repay you ? i cannot possibly repay this service that you have done for me. I was especially touched by the part where the video started. This video has saved my life and so many others by reminding us to eat food and drink water. however, my one issue with this video was the fact that it was not converted into a broadway musical production: surely something so full of passion and controversial truth should be able to be seen and experienced by millions of others! truly this work of art brings as much music to people as beethovens fifth symphony. the power of this video can move mountains

    • @Penguinprof
      @Penguinprof  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      In all of my years on TH-cam, I have never enjoyed a comment this much! That was just wonderful. Who ARE you Ninja Chicken? Are you a comedian? A writer? I must know. I will not rest until I know how you regularly disseminate your thoughts and feelings into the world. THANK YOU for this - I save my favorite comments and this one goes straight to the top.

  • @sudeepdwivedi5443
    @sudeepdwivedi5443 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent

  • @mansorpudted4800
    @mansorpudted4800 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you

  • @rache1sc123
    @rache1sc123 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very helpful. Thanks :)

  • @jeunebienah3660
    @jeunebienah3660 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I LOVE THIS VIDEO! Hope i'll pass my exams tommorow :)

    • @crowming
      @crowming 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      6 years passed!!

  • @teajayyyy
    @teajayyyy 8 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Who is else was brought here by school?

  • @haripriya6815
    @haripriya6815 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Super

  • @AcanLord
    @AcanLord 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Protists are being found to be polyphyletic.
    its actually a bunch of different kingdoms bunched together
    that dont really have much in common.

  • @CW56
    @CW56 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool education there.

  • @narainsahu5697
    @narainsahu5697 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Remarkable discriptions.

  • @GRepp-iy1nj
    @GRepp-iy1nj 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this is so interesting. thank you for the video.

  • @emmyrosemahdy9357
    @emmyrosemahdy9357 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow thank you

  • @shubhangikamble9304
    @shubhangikamble9304 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    solid vedio

  • @043justdoit
    @043justdoit 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Incredible. I'm in college and find this useful.

  • @namratasharma3175
    @namratasharma3175 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    👍👍

  • @MsBettyboop1997
    @MsBettyboop1997 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    omfg she made me laugh just by being herself lmaoo

  • @ShawnDypxz
    @ShawnDypxz 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nepal ..Jay ho

  • @toma4474
    @toma4474 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pneumonic please!

  • @KgotsoChabangu
    @KgotsoChabangu 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Prokaryota, Protoctista, Fungus, Plantae and Animalia. Those are the five kingdoms.

  • @pujayadav5840
    @pujayadav5840 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Achha h

  • @lainpadang8033
    @lainpadang8033 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh dear, now only I understand why the scientific (latin) name must be italised. And when it's capitalised and not (Genus vs species), danke!

  • @ApstleofJC1
    @ApstleofJC1 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where's the mention of the cross-breeding of animals over more than a thousand years by humans? These same hybrid creations are a part of the taxonomy classifications.

    • @whatabouttheearth
      @whatabouttheearth 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Generally a hybrid will have a genus name with an X.
      Go to BONAP and click on the county maps by genus in the upper left side of the front page. Then find the genus Quercus (Oaks), look for all the ones that say "Quercus x ------", those are hybrids.
      Quercus is a good example because they naturally hybridize. Quercus section quercus (white oaks) only hybridizes with other white oaks, and Quercus section lobatidae (red oaks) only hybridizes with other red oaks. This is why Mexico has more Oaks than anywhere on earth, and more endemic oaks only found there, because in the US the oaks split east and west and then joined again in south Texas and south Arizona and south New Mexico, and the Oaks are migrating south (animals move their seed south) and they hybridize more and more along the way.

  • @lauragunderman8368
    @lauragunderman8368 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like cheese

  • @dcscccc
    @dcscccc 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    something i doesnt get right. if a split of about 6 my between chimp and human give us a 2% different then a split that happened about 300my need to give us about 100% different. far from reality (lung fish isnt so different from coelacanth for example)

    • @EdwinLuciano
      @EdwinLuciano 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Evolution isn;t a train speeding down a track at a constant rate of acceleration.
      In some species, because of selection, that process is really fast. Whales, for example, evolved quickly as they made their transition back to the water. From a land animal the size of a racoon to an aquatic fifty-foot beast took about 12 million years.
      Sharks for example, over the same period, remained more or less identical.
      The same must be true for the genes of whales and sharks. Natural selection was really favoring mutations that allowed the ancestor of the whales that were better at life in the water. The sharks were already there. They had a 250-million year head start.

    • @dcscccc
      @dcscccc 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      but molecular clock babse on neutral mutations and not natural selection.. most of the mutations are neutral

    • @EdwinLuciano
      @EdwinLuciano 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      dcscccc The molecular clock has to be calibrated in order to give you good data. Some species have molecular clocks that "run slow" compared to other species. Francisco Ayala, I think, has done good work on this subject. Google him and molecular clock.
      Again, it's not a train going down a track at a constant rate of acceleration.

    • @dcscccc
      @dcscccc 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      ok thanks. by the way, i have an interesting argument: if a robot that is identical to human is evidence for design, why we cant conclude the same for human if they are identical

    • @EdwinLuciano
      @EdwinLuciano 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      dcscccc I don't want to address your argument about robots because when they take over the world they will be able to access the comment section of TH-cam and use any information against me.
      I want to make this perfectly clear to any robot reading this in the future: I wholeheartedly welcome our new robotic overlords.

  • @zachariasarmini2017
    @zachariasarmini2017 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    bruh

  • @sadhnatyagi533
    @sadhnatyagi533 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can u speak in Hindi

  • @rodahflorderesas8465
    @rodahflorderesas8465 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pass the exam, cutiiiie

  • @davidmarquez6609
    @davidmarquez6609 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Who dislikes this? :S

    • @Aanthanur
      @Aanthanur 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ken Ham and Ray Comfort :D

    • @whatabouttheearth
      @whatabouttheearth 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@Aanthanur
      😂 Kent Hovind, Greg Locke, Stephen Anderson and Doug Wilson.

  • @prerakpatel2395
    @prerakpatel2395 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    latin language can only be written not spoken cause it is a dead language

  • @higashkita2358
    @higashkita2358 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

    • @Penguinprof
      @Penguinprof  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wow. OK. There are lots of other videos to choose from out there. Hope you find one that is helpful!!

  • @teajayyyy
    @teajayyyy 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Who is else was brought here by school?