I'm not sure British law on Copy Right, but in the United States, you can NOT copyright anything written by AI. There must be an actual artist involved, and by involved I mean creating the actual work of art. Simply typing a prompt does not give you copy right.
Just listened to some Beatles AI music on youtube, John Winston Lennon is name of channel. Not sure if AI adapted the sound of a recording by other artists or if it was trained with Beatles and ELO... creepy though
the problem is AI only knows what has come before because it has to be trained on existing data, if the data doesn't exist for a concept then it can't.
It's not about originality or quality whatever that is in any given context, but it's a matter of urge, expression, anger, libido, fear, happiness. Therefor music will be one of the last areas AI will get any good at. And don't get me wrong, I've just brushed up my web design and database knowledge with the help of chatGPT and if you steer it with a firm hand and never trust it it's amazing. At the same time it's sooo happily mindless and confident at squirting the most realitybending nonsense with a straight face you're gasping for air haha! Then it appologizes and ... do the same thing in another direction like a round bottomed toy bouncing back up when you know it over. But damn it's unbeatable at writing the boring part of code fast!
"If people can work faster they will" Tell that to the guy using the modular rig lol.
I'm not sure British law on Copy Right, but in the United States, you can NOT copyright anything written by AI. There must be an actual artist involved, and by involved I mean creating the actual work of art. Simply typing a prompt does not give you copy right.
It's called a Neural Network. Let's keep the language to "super-intelligence"
Just listened to some Beatles AI music on youtube, John Winston Lennon is name of channel. Not sure if AI adapted the sound of a recording by other artists or if it was trained with Beatles and ELO... creepy though
could it have the opposite effect and make real musicians playing live more appreciated
AI can’t compete with human composers. But it will.
the problem is AI only knows what has come before because it has to be trained on existing data, if the data doesn't exist for a concept then it can't.
Then you don’t understand AI.
@@slaphappyduplenty2436 no actually the problem is that I do.
Music is about 'emotion', AI fails in that...
It would have to be worth a shot for the UK's future entries to Eurovision. The results couldn't get any worse!
It's not about originality or quality whatever that is in any given context, but it's a matter of urge, expression, anger, libido, fear, happiness. Therefor music will be one of the last areas AI will get any good at. And don't get me wrong, I've just brushed up my web design and database knowledge with the help of chatGPT and if you steer it with a firm hand and never trust it it's amazing. At the same time it's sooo happily mindless and confident at squirting the most realitybending nonsense with a straight face you're gasping for air haha! Then it appologizes and ... do the same thing in another direction like a round bottomed toy bouncing back up when you know it over. But damn it's unbeatable at writing the boring part of code fast!
With so much bad music humans "composers" make, there's plenty of room for AI. And before long, AI will be better than most of today's "composers".